@notambourine/brand-kit 1.4.0 → 1.5.0
This diff represents the content of publicly available package versions that have been released to one of the supported registries. The information contained in this diff is provided for informational purposes only and reflects changes between package versions as they appear in their respective public registries.
- package/package.json +1 -1
- package/references/voice.md +75 -77
package/package.json
CHANGED
package/references/voice.md
CHANGED
|
@@ -1,81 +1,81 @@
|
|
|
1
1
|
# Voice and copy audit
|
|
2
2
|
|
|
3
|
-
Lead public
|
|
3
|
+
Lead public pages and introductions with:
|
|
4
4
|
|
|
5
|
-
>
|
|
5
|
+
> Ship the systems your business needs next.
|
|
6
6
|
|
|
7
|
-
For
|
|
7
|
+
For existing systems, use:
|
|
8
8
|
|
|
9
|
-
>
|
|
9
|
+
> Improve the systems that run your business.
|
|
10
10
|
|
|
11
|
-
Follow
|
|
12
|
-
|
|
11
|
+
Follow with what we will deliver and what the client can do once it ships. Write
|
|
12
|
+
plainly and warmly. Use humor only when it makes the point clearer.
|
|
13
13
|
|
|
14
14
|
## Positioning and offers
|
|
15
15
|
|
|
16
|
-
Position NoTambourine as senior engineers who
|
|
17
|
-
|
|
18
|
-
|
|
19
|
-
|
|
20
|
-
without adding manual steps. AI at the keyboard explains small-team economics;
|
|
21
|
-
it is not the offer.
|
|
16
|
+
Position NoTambourine as senior engineers who join the client's team, use AI
|
|
17
|
+
throughout delivery, and own the work from business goal to shipped system. Name
|
|
18
|
+
the software, data, or infrastructure needed to reach that goal. Keep the time
|
|
19
|
+
between a decision and working software short.
|
|
22
20
|
|
|
23
|
-
|
|
24
|
-
|
|
25
|
-
|
|
21
|
+
Treat AI as a working capability. Explain where it speeds up delivery, automates
|
|
22
|
+
work, improves a product, or helps a team use its information. Name the result,
|
|
23
|
+
not the novelty. Do not make broad claims about transformation or intelligence.
|
|
26
24
|
|
|
27
|
-
|
|
28
|
-
|
|
25
|
+
Show engineers working with product managers, operators, designers, and domain
|
|
26
|
+
experts. Credit clear priorities, sound decisions, and close coordination for
|
|
27
|
+
delivery speed. Never claim that eliminating a role, planning, documentation, or
|
|
28
|
+
meetings makes a team fast.
|
|
29
29
|
|
|
30
|
-
|
|
31
|
-
|
|
30
|
+
Define fit by the result and the responsibility we will take. Mention
|
|
31
|
+
private-equity experience when relevant, but keep general positioning open to
|
|
32
|
+
any ownership structure. The name means no padding.
|
|
33
|
+
|
|
34
|
+
Use this introduction:
|
|
35
|
+
|
|
36
|
+
> Ship the systems your business needs next. NoTambourine brings senior
|
|
37
|
+
> engineers into your team to own delivery and build with AI.
|
|
32
38
|
|
|
33
39
|
For a meta description or short directory listing, use:
|
|
34
40
|
|
|
35
|
-
> Senior engineers
|
|
36
|
-
>
|
|
41
|
+
> Senior engineers using AI inside your team to ship the systems your business
|
|
42
|
+
> needs next.
|
|
37
43
|
|
|
38
|
-
Give
|
|
39
|
-
work, or connecting systems
|
|
40
|
-
|
|
41
|
-
|
|
42
|
-
|
|
43
|
-
engagement. Support claims of growth, time saved, or reliability with client
|
|
44
|
+
Give clear reasons to call: launching a product, improving a core system,
|
|
45
|
+
automating routine work, or connecting systems and data. Describe the shipped
|
|
46
|
+
change in daily terms. A file arrives automatically. An order moves between
|
|
47
|
+
systems. A team releases an update. A customer gets a useful answer. Support
|
|
48
|
+
claims about growth, time saved, reliability, or delivery speed with client
|
|
44
49
|
evidence.
|
|
45
50
|
|
|
46
|
-
Keep public positioning open to
|
|
47
|
-
|
|
48
|
-
|
|
49
|
-
|
|
50
|
-
to its business consequence and the work required.
|
|
51
|
+
Keep public positioning open to a new ambition or an existing constraint. Ask
|
|
52
|
+
what the client wants to accomplish, why now, and what will change after it
|
|
53
|
+
ships. In proposals, connect each constraint to its business consequence and the
|
|
54
|
+
work required.
|
|
51
55
|
|
|
52
|
-
Use these offer names
|
|
56
|
+
Use these offer names:
|
|
53
57
|
|
|
54
|
-
- **Assessment:**
|
|
55
|
-
and
|
|
56
|
-
|
|
57
|
-
|
|
58
|
-
the systems and ways of working your business needs next.
|
|
58
|
+
- **Assessment:** Choose what to build or change next. Review the systems,
|
|
59
|
+
workflows, and priorities, then set the delivery plan.
|
|
60
|
+
- **Embedded:** Add senior engineers who build with AI to your team. We own
|
|
61
|
+
delivery and ship the systems your business needs next.
|
|
59
62
|
|
|
60
63
|
Use "Start a conversation" for the primary invitation. Ask what the reader wants
|
|
61
|
-
to
|
|
64
|
+
to ship and when. Discuss fit before asking them to choose an engagement.
|
|
62
65
|
|
|
63
66
|
## Register and evidence
|
|
64
67
|
|
|
65
68
|
- Address marketing readers as "you". In client deliverables, use "we" for the
|
|
66
69
|
client's organization with us inside it. Name the parties in proposals and
|
|
67
70
|
SOWs. Never use "I" as the author's voice.
|
|
68
|
-
-
|
|
69
|
-
|
|
70
|
-
- Show the
|
|
71
|
-
numbers when available
|
|
72
|
-
delivered work to commercial and operational results when supported. Share
|
|
71
|
+
- Keep sales material out of client deliverables. Explain the client's system,
|
|
72
|
+
the decisions to make, and the work to ship.
|
|
73
|
+
- Show the objective, what shipped, and what the client can now do. Use client
|
|
74
|
+
numbers when available. Otherwise use a verifiable before and after. Share
|
|
73
75
|
client evidence only with permission.
|
|
74
|
-
- Name who joins and
|
|
75
|
-
|
|
76
|
-
|
|
77
|
-
- Describe constraints without blaming the people who built the system. Explain
|
|
78
|
-
coordination without jokes about ceremony.
|
|
76
|
+
- Name who joins and owns delivery. Promise direct access to that person. Cover
|
|
77
|
+
our estimating mistakes within the agreed scope.
|
|
78
|
+
- Describe constraints without blaming the people who built the system.
|
|
79
79
|
|
|
80
80
|
## Names and mechanics
|
|
81
81
|
|
|
@@ -90,24 +90,23 @@ slide, sign-off, or footer. The instrument is lowercase. This is the only
|
|
|
90
90
|
permitted spaced form.
|
|
91
91
|
|
|
92
92
|
Use sentence case for headlines, buttons, navigation, and labels. Reserve
|
|
93
|
-
uppercase for pink eyebrows; decks also use
|
|
94
|
-
|
|
95
|
-
|
|
96
|
-
|
|
93
|
+
uppercase for pink eyebrows; decks also use it for sublabels. Follow deck
|
|
94
|
+
guidance for lowercase display headlines. Vary sentence length. Cut
|
|
95
|
+
throat-clearing, superlatives, exclamation marks, and clever phrasing that
|
|
96
|
+
delays the point.
|
|
97
97
|
|
|
98
|
-
Use ASCII punctuation: hyphens and straight quotes/apostrophes.
|
|
99
|
-
curly quotes, or single-character ellipses.
|
|
100
|
-
|
|
98
|
+
Use ASCII punctuation: hyphens and straight quotes/apostrophes. Do not use em/en
|
|
99
|
+
dashes, curly quotes, or single-character ellipses. The interpunct may separate
|
|
100
|
+
a name, role, and company: `Tom Fuertes · Principal · NoTambourine`.
|
|
101
101
|
|
|
102
102
|
## Audit before shipping
|
|
103
103
|
|
|
104
104
|
Audit anything clients or strangers see: pages, email, decks, proposals, SOWs,
|
|
105
|
-
READMEs, and release notes. Search for candidates, then judge them in context
|
|
105
|
+
READMEs, and release notes. Search for candidates, then judge them in context.
|
|
106
106
|
|
|
107
|
-
|
|
108
|
-
|
|
109
|
-
|
|
110
|
-
decision or result.
|
|
107
|
+
The opening should name the work and our responsibility. Remove assumed pain,
|
|
108
|
+
unearned urgency, decorative language, and claims that could describe any
|
|
109
|
+
agency. Keep technical constraints when they explain a decision or result.
|
|
111
110
|
|
|
112
111
|
```sh
|
|
113
112
|
rg -n 'notambourine|Notambourine|No\s+Tambourine|NoTambourine LLC' <file>
|
|
@@ -119,19 +118,18 @@ rg -n '!(\s|$)|\bI\b' <file>
|
|
|
119
118
|
```
|
|
120
119
|
|
|
121
120
|
Check legal-name occurrences against the contract limit. Ignore technical slugs
|
|
122
|
-
and code when judging wordmark hits
|
|
123
|
-
|
|
124
|
-
|
|
125
|
-
|
|
126
|
-
Cut
|
|
127
|
-
|
|
128
|
-
|
|
129
|
-
|
|
130
|
-
|
|
131
|
-
|
|
132
|
-
|
|
133
|
-
|
|
134
|
-
|
|
135
|
-
|
|
136
|
-
|
|
137
|
-
rendered document after formatting, especially slide breaks and tables.
|
|
121
|
+
and code when judging wordmark hits. Ignore literal technical uses such as "a
|
|
122
|
+
robust error path" and `I` in quotations, identifiers, or names.
|
|
123
|
+
|
|
124
|
+
Cut puffery and keep evidence. Replace claims of importance with the
|
|
125
|
+
consequence. Cut participle tails at the comma. Narrow grand claims to something
|
|
126
|
+
a client can verify. If a sentence keeps its meaning after a phrase is cut, cut
|
|
127
|
+
the phrase.
|
|
128
|
+
|
|
129
|
+
Keep three fixtures even when they match a search flag: the signature, factual
|
|
130
|
+
lines such as "Two engineers, six weeks, one shipped feature", and one pink
|
|
131
|
+
`<em>` in a headline.
|
|
132
|
+
|
|
133
|
+
Format source documents with the repository's pinned Prettier before sharing or
|
|
134
|
+
exporting them. Review the rendered document, especially slide breaks and
|
|
135
|
+
tables.
|