@noresponse/mcp 0.13.29 → 0.13.31

package/CHANGELOG.md

@@ -1,5 +1,13 @@
 # Changelog
 
+## 0.13.31
+
+* `SDK.groups.getPerson()`:  `response.lookup.checks[].unanswered` **Added**
+
+## 0.13.30
+
+No changes detected.
+
 ## 0.13.29
 
 No changes detected.

package/bin/mcp-server.js

@@ -48136,9 +48136,9 @@ var init_config = __esm(() => {
   SDK_METADATA = {
     language: "typescript",
     openapiDocVersion: "1",
-    sdkVersion: "0.13.29",
+    sdkVersion: "0.13.31",
     genVersion: "internal",
-    userAgent: "noresponse-sdk/mcp-typescript 0.13.29 internal 1 @noresponse/mcp"
+    userAgent: "noresponse-sdk/mcp-typescript 0.13.31 internal 1 @noresponse/mcp"
   };
 });
 
@@ -62619,7 +62619,7 @@ var init_record = __esm(() => {
     agreed: array(string2()).optional().describe("The fields of this record whose values agreed with what is known of the person, by their field names, in the record's order. The value that found the record is not among them."),
     clashed: array(string2()).optional().describe("The fields of this record that clashed with what is known of the person: a birth date or a full name that differs from the person's."),
     fields: array(RecordField$zodSchema).describe("Every field the source returned, in the order the source's connector lists them; a breach row's columns in name order. Nothing is withheld: a breach row's passwords, hashes and salts are fields like any other."),
-    id: string2().describe("Made from the source and the fields' names and original values, so the same answer found twice is one record with the same id."),
+    id: string2().describe("Made from the source and the fields' names and original values, so the same answer found twice is one record with the same id. Its fields are typed as its latest finding typed them."),
     joined: boolean2().optional().describe("Whether the record joins the person: its likelihood reached 0.9 or a reviewer joined it, and no reviewer rejected it. A record that does not join stays a lead."),
     likelihood: number2().optional().describe("How likely the record is the person it was found for, from 0.01 to 0.99, to two places. A record found by the person's own email or phone starts as theirs; any other starts lower the more people its search found on its site. Each value it shares with what is known of the person raises it, a rare value more than a common one, and a different birth date or full name lowers it. What is known is what the person's row gives and the values of their own records: those found by their email or phone, and those a reviewer joined. Present on a person's lookup records, with agreed, clashed and joined."),
     matched: array(RecordMatch$zodSchema).describe("Each kind of searched value that found the record."),
@@ -62654,6 +62654,17 @@ var init_screeninglookupcheckstatus = __esm(() => {
   ]).describe("found: a source found the identifier. not_found: every source answered and none found it. partial: the sources that answered found nothing and the others did not answer. not_covered: no source answered. A lookup that failed reads partial or not_covered, not not_found.");
 });
 
+// src/models/screeninglookupcheckunanswereditem.ts
+var ScreeningLookupCheckUnansweredItem$zodSchema;
+var init_screeninglookupcheckunanswereditem = __esm(() => {
+  init_zod();
+  init_failurereason();
+  ScreeningLookupCheckUnansweredItem$zodSchema = object({
+    connector: string2().describe("The id of the connector that did not answer: breach for the breach search."),
+    reason: FailureReason$zodSchema.describe("Why a signal or source did not produce a definite found/not_found. timed_out means the source missed the request deadline; a continuation may still settle it. deferred means the (source, identifier) pair is async-only and was not attempted on the synchronous path; a continuation settles it.")
+  });
+});
+
 // src/models/screeninglookupcheck.ts
 var ScreeningLookupCheck$zodSchema;
 var init_screeninglookupcheck = __esm(() => {
@@ -62662,6 +62673,7 @@ var init_screeninglookupcheck = __esm(() => {
   init_identifiersearchkind();
   init_lane();
   init_screeninglookupcheckstatus();
+  init_screeninglookupcheckunanswereditem();
   ScreeningLookupCheck$zodSchema = object({
     answered: int().describe("Sources that gave a definite answer."),
     found: int().describe("Sources that found the identifier."),
@@ -62669,7 +62681,8 @@ var init_screeninglookupcheck = __esm(() => {
     lane: Lane$zodSchema.describe("An evidence lane: accounts (account presence for email and username), phone, breach, domain (the email domain's registration) and ip."),
     reason: FailureReason$zodSchema.optional().describe("Why a signal or source did not produce a definite found/not_found. timed_out means the source missed the request deadline; a continuation may still settle it. deferred means the (source, identifier) pair is async-only and was not attempted on the synchronous path; a continuation settles it."),
     sources: int().describe("Sources asked: none when no source could be, as when the source is stopped or your workspace refuses it."),
-    status: ScreeningLookupCheckStatus$zodSchema.describe("found: a source found the identifier. not_found: every source answered and none found it. partial: the sources that answered found nothing and the others did not answer. not_covered: no source answered. A lookup that failed reads partial or not_covered, not not_found.")
+    status: ScreeningLookupCheckStatus$zodSchema.describe("found: a source found the identifier. not_found: every source answered and none found it. partial: the sources that answered found nothing and the others did not answer. not_covered: no source answered. A lookup that failed reads partial or not_covered, not not_found."),
+    unanswered: array(ScreeningLookupCheckUnansweredItem$zodSchema).optional().describe("Each source that did not give a definite answer, by connector, with why: the same connector id a record's source names. A source of the lane that no connector covers is counted in sources and not named here.")
   }).describe("What came of one lane of the lookups for one identifier.");
 });
 
@@ -74387,7 +74400,7 @@ endpoint.verification sends a signed challenge now and answers whether the endpo
 function createMCPServer(deps) {
   const server = new McpServer({
     name: "NoResponse",
-    version: "0.13.29"
+    version: "0.13.31"
   });
   const getClient = deps.getSDK || (() => new NoResponseCore({
     security: deps.security,
@@ -83820,7 +83833,7 @@ var routes = buildRouteMap({
 var app = buildApplication(routes, {
   name: "mcp",
   versionInfo: {
-    currentVersion: "0.13.29"
+    currentVersion: "0.13.31"
   }
 });
 run(app, process3.argv.slice(2), buildContext(process3));
@@ -83828,5 +83841,5 @@ export {
   app
 };
 
-//# debugId=AD2B26AF93265DE564756E2164756E21
+//# debugId=E5FC93E168FC37ED64756E2164756E21
 //# sourceMappingURL=mcp-server.js.map