@noresponse/mcp 0.11.7 → 0.11.9

This diff represents the content of publicly available package versions that have been released to one of the supported registries. The information contained in this diff is provided for informational purposes only and reflects changes between package versions as they appear in their respective public registries.
package/CHANGELOG.md CHANGED
@@ -1,5 +1,27 @@
1
1
  # Changelog
2
2
 
3
+ ## 0.11.9
4
+
5
+ * `SDK.assessments.create()`: `response.detail.risk.details.breaches[].conduct` **Added**
6
+ * `SDK.assessments.get()`: `response.detail.risk.details.breaches[].conduct` **Added**
7
+ * `SDK.assessments.query()`: `response.items[].risk.details.breaches[].conduct` **Added**
8
+ * `SDK.assessments.search()`: `response.items[].detail.risk.details.breaches[].conduct` **Added**
9
+ * `SDK.assessments.retrieveVersion()`: `response.detail.risk.details.breaches[].conduct` **Added**
10
+ * `SDK.accounts.listAssessments()`: `response.items[].risk.details.breaches[].conduct` **Added**
11
+ * `SDK.accounts.export()`: `response.assessments[].detail.risk.details.breaches[].conduct` **Added**
12
+ * `SDK.accounts.search()`: `response.items[].latest.detail.risk.details.breaches[].conduct` **Added**
13
+
14
+ ## 0.11.8
15
+
16
+ * `SDK.assessments.create()`: `response.detail.risk` **Changed**
17
+ * `SDK.assessments.get()`: `response.detail.risk` **Changed**
18
+ * `SDK.assessments.query()`: `response.items[].risk` **Changed**
19
+ * `SDK.assessments.search()`: `response.items[].detail.risk` **Changed**
20
+ * `SDK.assessments.retrieveVersion()`: `response.detail.risk` **Changed**
21
+ * `SDK.accounts.listAssessments()`: `response.items[].risk` **Changed**
22
+ * `SDK.accounts.export()`: `response.assessments[].detail.risk` **Changed**
23
+ * `SDK.accounts.search()`: `response.items[].latest.detail.risk` **Changed**
24
+
3
25
  ## 0.11.7
4
26
 
5
27
  No changes detected.
package/bin/mcp-server.js CHANGED
@@ -48136,9 +48136,9 @@ var init_config = __esm(() => {
48136
48136
  SDK_METADATA = {
48137
48137
  language: "typescript",
48138
48138
  openapiDocVersion: "1",
48139
- sdkVersion: "0.11.7",
48139
+ sdkVersion: "0.11.9",
48140
48140
  genVersion: "internal",
48141
- userAgent: "noresponse-sdk/mcp-typescript 0.11.7 internal 1 @noresponse/mcp"
48141
+ userAgent: "noresponse-sdk/mcp-typescript 0.11.9 internal 1 @noresponse/mcp"
48142
48142
  };
48143
48143
  });
48144
48144
 
@@ -50603,6 +50603,17 @@ var init_riskcoverage = __esm(() => {
50603
50603
  }).describe("Counts of planned source-identifier pairs by evidence outcome, deduplicated across signals and incomplete entries. These counts do not measure identity agreement or prove that processing is still running. A lane that was not searched is not an answered source.");
50604
50604
  });
50605
50605
 
50606
+ // src/models/breachconduct.ts
50607
+ var BreachConduct$zodSchema;
50608
+ var init_breachconduct = __esm(() => {
50609
+ init_zod();
50610
+ BreachConduct$zodSchema = _enum([
50611
+ "chargeback",
50612
+ "declined_payment",
50613
+ "forum_sanction"
50614
+ ]).describe("What a breach table's rows record against the identifier: chargeback, one or more chargebacks; declined_payment, one or more declined payments; forum_sanction, a forum ban, warning or infraction. A category and not a value: the schema has no member for one.");
50615
+ });
50616
+
50606
50617
  // src/models/breachexposed.ts
50607
50618
  var BreachExposed$zodSchema;
50608
50619
  var init_breachexposed = __esm(() => {
@@ -50652,11 +50663,13 @@ var init_breachselector = __esm(() => {
50652
50663
  var Breach$zodSchema;
50653
50664
  var init_breach = __esm(() => {
50654
50665
  init_zod();
50666
+ init_breachconduct();
50655
50667
  init_breachexposed();
50656
50668
  init_breachkind();
50657
50669
  init_breachselector();
50658
50670
  Breach$zodSchema = object({
50659
50671
  category: string2().optional().describe("The table's category from its name, lower case (social, gaming, combolist, ...)."),
50672
+ conduct: array(BreachConduct$zodSchema).optional().describe("What this table's rows record against the matched email or username: the tables behind the forum_sanctioned and prior_payment_abuse reasons. Absent when the rows record none, for a table matched on an IP address, and from an answer stored before it was recorded."),
50660
50673
  domain: string2().optional().describe("The breached site's domain, lower case. Absent when the table has none (a credential list, for example)."),
50661
50674
  exposed: array(BreachExposed$zodSchema).optional(),
50662
50675
  kind: BreachKind$zodSchema.describe("Who is in the table: site_breach, a site's own users; credential_list, a combolist or compilation; stealer_log, malware or botnet victims; scrape; hacking_forum, a criminal hacking, cracking or carding community; abuse_service, the customers of DDoS-for-hire, account generators, dump or card shops, darknet markets, stalkerware or breach-lookup services; darkweb_site, an onion site of unknown purpose."),
@@ -50747,6 +50760,30 @@ var init_onlineaccount = __esm(() => {
50747
50760
  }).describe("One online-account search of the signup's email or username, detailed view only. name and domain name the platform searched, not a provider. outcome is the search's signal outcome: found, not_found, or a failure (blocked, unavailable, inconclusive) with its reason; a failure is not reported as not_found. The members after reason are what the platform returned beside an account it found, each absent when it did not say.");
50748
50761
  });
50749
50762
 
50763
+ // src/models/attribute.ts
50764
+ var Attribute$zodSchema;
50765
+ var init_attribute = __esm(() => {
50766
+ init_zod();
50767
+ Attribute$zodSchema = _enum([
50768
+ "birth_date",
50769
+ "gender",
50770
+ "nationality",
50771
+ "name_gender"
50772
+ ]).describe("name_gender is the records' gender against the submitted first name's usual one.");
50773
+ });
50774
+
50775
+ // src/models/riskdetailsattributeconflict.ts
50776
+ var RiskDetailsAttributeConflict$zodSchema;
50777
+ var init_riskdetailsattributeconflict = __esm(() => {
50778
+ init_zod();
50779
+ init_attribute();
50780
+ RiskDetailsAttributeConflict$zodSchema = object({
50781
+ attribute: Attribute$zodSchema.describe("name_gender is the records' gender against the submitted first name's usual one."),
50782
+ sites: array(string2()).optional().describe("The domains of the breached sites whose tables report the attribute, newest breach first, at most 32. Absent when none of the tables has a site."),
50783
+ unsited: int().optional().describe("How many of the tables reporting the attribute have no site, such as a credential list or a stealer log. Absent when none.")
50784
+ });
50785
+ });
50786
+
50750
50787
  // src/models/riskdetailsbreachname.ts
50751
50788
  var RiskDetailsBreachName$zodSchema;
50752
50789
  var init_riskdetailsbreachname = __esm(() => {
@@ -50817,11 +50854,13 @@ var init_riskdetails = __esm(() => {
50817
50854
  init_zod();
50818
50855
  init_breach();
50819
50856
  init_onlineaccount();
50857
+ init_riskdetailsattributeconflict();
50820
50858
  init_riskdetailsbreachname();
50821
50859
  init_riskdetailsevent();
50822
50860
  init_riskdetailsphonename();
50823
50861
  RiskDetails$zodSchema = object({
50824
50862
  accounts: array(OnlineAccount$zodSchema).optional().describe("Every online-account search of the email or username: the platform, what the search came to and, for an account found, what the platform returned beside it. Found first, then not found, then searches that failed or are still running, each by platform name; at most 64. A failed or running search keeps its own outcome and is not reported as not_found."),
50863
+ attribute_conflicts: array(RiskDetailsAttributeConflict$zodSchema).optional().describe("What an identity_attribute_conflict reason weighed: each attribute the records disagree on and the sites reporting it. Absent when the reason did not fire, and on an answer stored before conflicts were recorded. No value is served."),
50825
50864
  breach_names: array(RiskDetailsBreachName$zodSchema).optional().describe("Names found next to the identifiers in breach records, merged, with the number of distinct tables each was seen in and the sites of those tables."),
50826
50865
  breaches: array(Breach$zodSchema).optional().describe("The matching breach tables, newest first, at most 100."),
50827
50866
  events: array(RiskDetailsEvent$zodSchema).optional().describe("The identity's dated footprint events, newest first, at most 300: the year and month, what happened (created, last_active, breached), the site, its category, the kind of evidence and the identifier it belongs to. No breach value: dates are coarsened to the month."),
@@ -51091,7 +51130,9 @@ var init_risk = __esm(() => {
51091
51130
  policy_version: string2().describe("Version of the hand-authored heuristic policy that produced the recommendation, for example 'risk-2026-10.7'. A workspace threshold override adds a +t<N> suffix, e.g. 'risk-2026-10.7+t3'."),
51092
51131
  reasons: array(RiskReason$zodSchema).describe("Every reason that fired: risk-raising reasons first, then neutral, then risk-lowering, each strongest impact band first and then by code. The policy's numeric weights are kept private, so a reason carries only its direction and impact band."),
51093
51132
  recommendation: Recommendation$zodSchema.describe("The recommended action: allow, step_up or review. Your application applies it."),
51133
+ review_threshold: int().optional().describe("The score at which this answer's flow starts to recommend review. An answer nothing answered recommends review below it, with confidence unavailable. Absent from an answer stored before it was recorded."),
51094
51134
  score: int(),
51135
+ step_up_threshold: int().optional().describe("The score at which this answer's flow starts to recommend step_up. Absent from an answer stored before it was recorded."),
51095
51136
  summary: RiskSummary$zodSchema.optional().describe("A few typed facts per identifier. Every fact is optional: absent means the evidence did not answer and makes no claim, while false or 0 is a definite answer. Lanes that do not exist yet leave their members absent.")
51096
51137
  }).describe("The one risk decision for this event. score is 0 (safe) to 100 (risky), set by the reasons that fired under a hand-set, versioned heuristic policy. Each reason carries its direction and impact band; the policy's weights are not published. Every answer with a recommendation carries it, and the top-level recommendation equals risk.recommendation. It names no source or provider.");
51097
51138
  });
@@ -70292,7 +70333,7 @@ endpoint.verification sends a signed challenge now and answers whether the endpo
70292
70333
  function createMCPServer(deps) {
70293
70334
  const server = new McpServer({
70294
70335
  name: "NoResponse",
70295
- version: "0.11.7"
70336
+ version: "0.11.9"
70296
70337
  });
70297
70338
  const getClient = deps.getSDK || (() => new NoResponseCore({
70298
70339
  security: deps.security,
@@ -79597,7 +79638,7 @@ var routes = buildRouteMap({
79597
79638
  var app = buildApplication(routes, {
79598
79639
  name: "mcp",
79599
79640
  versionInfo: {
79600
- currentVersion: "0.11.7"
79641
+ currentVersion: "0.11.9"
79601
79642
  }
79602
79643
  });
79603
79644
  run(app, process3.argv.slice(2), buildContext(process3));
@@ -79605,5 +79646,5 @@ export {
79605
79646
  app
79606
79647
  };
79607
79648
 
79608
- //# debugId=43D4E9E3152AA8F864756E2164756E21
79649
+ //# debugId=704B341DEB5F9FF064756E2164756E21
79609
79650
  //# sourceMappingURL=mcp-server.js.map