@noresponse/mcp 0.11.7 → 0.11.8

package/CHANGELOG.md

@@ -1,5 +1,16 @@
 # Changelog
 
+## 0.11.8
+
+* `SDK.assessments.create()`:  `response.detail.risk` **Changed**
+* `SDK.assessments.get()`:  `response.detail.risk` **Changed**
+* `SDK.assessments.query()`:  `response.items[].risk` **Changed**
+* `SDK.assessments.search()`:  `response.items[].detail.risk` **Changed**
+* `SDK.assessments.retrieveVersion()`:  `response.detail.risk` **Changed**
+* `SDK.accounts.listAssessments()`:  `response.items[].risk` **Changed**
+* `SDK.accounts.export()`:  `response.assessments[].detail.risk` **Changed**
+* `SDK.accounts.search()`:  `response.items[].latest.detail.risk` **Changed**
+
 ## 0.11.7
 
 No changes detected.

package/bin/mcp-server.js

@@ -48136,9 +48136,9 @@ var init_config = __esm(() => {
   SDK_METADATA = {
     language: "typescript",
     openapiDocVersion: "1",
-    sdkVersion: "0.11.7",
+    sdkVersion: "0.11.8",
     genVersion: "internal",
-    userAgent: "noresponse-sdk/mcp-typescript 0.11.7 internal 1 @noresponse/mcp"
+    userAgent: "noresponse-sdk/mcp-typescript 0.11.8 internal 1 @noresponse/mcp"
   };
 });
 
@@ -50747,6 +50747,30 @@ var init_onlineaccount = __esm(() => {
   }).describe("One online-account search of the signup's email or username, detailed view only. name and domain name the platform searched, not a provider. outcome is the search's signal outcome: found, not_found, or a failure (blocked, unavailable, inconclusive) with its reason; a failure is not reported as not_found. The members after reason are what the platform returned beside an account it found, each absent when it did not say.");
 });
 
+// src/models/attribute.ts
+var Attribute$zodSchema;
+var init_attribute = __esm(() => {
+  init_zod();
+  Attribute$zodSchema = _enum([
+    "birth_date",
+    "gender",
+    "nationality",
+    "name_gender"
+  ]).describe("name_gender is the records' gender against the submitted first name's usual one.");
+});
+
+// src/models/riskdetailsattributeconflict.ts
+var RiskDetailsAttributeConflict$zodSchema;
+var init_riskdetailsattributeconflict = __esm(() => {
+  init_zod();
+  init_attribute();
+  RiskDetailsAttributeConflict$zodSchema = object({
+    attribute: Attribute$zodSchema.describe("name_gender is the records' gender against the submitted first name's usual one."),
+    sites: array(string2()).optional().describe("The domains of the breached sites whose tables report the attribute, newest breach first, at most 32. Absent when none of the tables has a site."),
+    unsited: int().optional().describe("How many of the tables reporting the attribute have no site, such as a credential list or a stealer log. Absent when none.")
+  });
+});
+
 // src/models/riskdetailsbreachname.ts
 var RiskDetailsBreachName$zodSchema;
 var init_riskdetailsbreachname = __esm(() => {
@@ -50817,11 +50841,13 @@ var init_riskdetails = __esm(() => {
   init_zod();
   init_breach();
   init_onlineaccount();
+  init_riskdetailsattributeconflict();
   init_riskdetailsbreachname();
   init_riskdetailsevent();
   init_riskdetailsphonename();
   RiskDetails$zodSchema = object({
     accounts: array(OnlineAccount$zodSchema).optional().describe("Every online-account search of the email or username: the platform, what the search came to and, for an account found, what the platform returned beside it. Found first, then not found, then searches that failed or are still running, each by platform name; at most 64. A failed or running search keeps its own outcome and is not reported as not_found."),
+    attribute_conflicts: array(RiskDetailsAttributeConflict$zodSchema).optional().describe("What an identity_attribute_conflict reason weighed: each attribute the records disagree on and the sites reporting it. Absent when the reason did not fire, and on an answer stored before conflicts were recorded. No value is served."),
     breach_names: array(RiskDetailsBreachName$zodSchema).optional().describe("Names found next to the identifiers in breach records, merged, with the number of distinct tables each was seen in and the sites of those tables."),
     breaches: array(Breach$zodSchema).optional().describe("The matching breach tables, newest first, at most 100."),
     events: array(RiskDetailsEvent$zodSchema).optional().describe("The identity's dated footprint events, newest first, at most 300: the year and month, what happened (created, last_active, breached), the site, its category, the kind of evidence and the identifier it belongs to. No breach value: dates are coarsened to the month."),
@@ -51091,7 +51117,9 @@ var init_risk = __esm(() => {
     policy_version: string2().describe("Version of the hand-authored heuristic policy that produced the recommendation, for example 'risk-2026-10.7'. A workspace threshold override adds a +t<N> suffix, e.g. 'risk-2026-10.7+t3'."),
     reasons: array(RiskReason$zodSchema).describe("Every reason that fired: risk-raising reasons first, then neutral, then risk-lowering, each strongest impact band first and then by code. The policy's numeric weights are kept private, so a reason carries only its direction and impact band."),
     recommendation: Recommendation$zodSchema.describe("The recommended action: allow, step_up or review. Your application applies it."),
+    review_threshold: int().optional().describe("The score at which this answer's flow starts to recommend review. An answer nothing answered recommends review below it, with confidence unavailable. Absent from an answer stored before it was recorded."),
     score: int(),
+    step_up_threshold: int().optional().describe("The score at which this answer's flow starts to recommend step_up. Absent from an answer stored before it was recorded."),
     summary: RiskSummary$zodSchema.optional().describe("A few typed facts per identifier. Every fact is optional: absent means the evidence did not answer and makes no claim, while false or 0 is a definite answer. Lanes that do not exist yet leave their members absent.")
   }).describe("The one risk decision for this event. score is 0 (safe) to 100 (risky), set by the reasons that fired under a hand-set, versioned heuristic policy. Each reason carries its direction and impact band; the policy's weights are not published. Every answer with a recommendation carries it, and the top-level recommendation equals risk.recommendation. It names no source or provider.");
 });
@@ -70292,7 +70320,7 @@ endpoint.verification sends a signed challenge now and answers whether the endpo
 function createMCPServer(deps) {
   const server = new McpServer({
     name: "NoResponse",
-    version: "0.11.7"
+    version: "0.11.8"
   });
   const getClient = deps.getSDK || (() => new NoResponseCore({
     security: deps.security,
@@ -79597,7 +79625,7 @@ var routes = buildRouteMap({
 var app = buildApplication(routes, {
   name: "mcp",
   versionInfo: {
-    currentVersion: "0.11.7"
+    currentVersion: "0.11.8"
   }
 });
 run(app, process3.argv.slice(2), buildContext(process3));
@@ -79605,5 +79633,5 @@ export {
   app
 };
 
-//# debugId=43D4E9E3152AA8F864756E2164756E21
+//# debugId=D4A7B1C34D31C42D64756E2164756E21
 //# sourceMappingURL=mcp-server.js.map