@noresponse/mcp 0.11.23 → 0.11.24

package/CHANGELOG.md

@@ -1,5 +1,9 @@
 # Changelog
 
+## 0.11.24
+
+* `SDK.events.getAttendee()`:  `response.lookup` **Added**
+
 ## 0.11.23
 
 * `SDK.events.listAttendees()`:  `response.items[].coverage.not_searched` **Added**

package/bin/mcp-server.js

@@ -48136,9 +48136,9 @@ var init_config = __esm(() => {
   SDK_METADATA = {
     language: "typescript",
     openapiDocVersion: "1",
-    sdkVersion: "0.11.23",
+    sdkVersion: "0.11.24",
     genVersion: "internal",
-    userAgent: "noresponse-sdk/mcp-typescript 0.11.23 internal 1 @noresponse/mcp"
+    userAgent: "noresponse-sdk/mcp-typescript 0.11.24 internal 1 @noresponse/mcp"
   };
 });
 
@@ -50867,7 +50867,7 @@ var init_riskdetails = __esm(() => {
     breaches: array(Breach$zodSchema).optional().describe("The matching breach tables, newest first, at most 100."),
     events: array(RiskDetailsEvent$zodSchema).optional().describe("The identity's dated footprint events, newest first, at most 300: the year and month, what happened (created, last_active, breached), the site, its category, the kind of evidence and the identifier it belongs to. No breach value: dates are coarsened to the month."),
     phone_names: array(RiskDetailsPhoneName$zodSchema).optional()
-  }).describe("Detailed view only (response_mode=detailed, which needs the detailed scope); a standard answer leaves it out. Merged observations without provider, source, origin, raw breach record, value or score.");
+  }).describe("Merged observations behind the summary, served only to a caller who may read evidence: no provider, source, origin, raw breach record or score.");
 });
 
 // src/models/riskreason.ts
@@ -51107,7 +51107,7 @@ var init_risksummary = __esm(() => {
     ip: IpSummary$zodSchema.optional().describe("Facts about the submitted IP from the offline database and this workspace's own recent assessments. Every member is optional; absent makes no claim."),
     phone: RiskSummaryPhone$zodSchema.optional(),
     username: RiskSummaryUsername$zodSchema.optional()
-  }).describe("A few typed facts per identifier. Every fact is optional: absent means the evidence did not answer and makes no claim, while false or 0 is a definite answer. Lanes that do not exist yet leave their members absent.");
+  }).describe("A few typed facts per identifier: an assessment's risk.summary, and an event screening attendee's lookup summary. Every fact is optional: absent means the evidence did not answer and makes no claim, while false or 0 is a definite answer.");
 });
 
 // src/models/risk.ts
@@ -51127,7 +51127,7 @@ var init_risk = __esm(() => {
     block_threshold: int().optional().describe("The block threshold this answer used: block is true exactly when score is at least this value. Absent while blocking is off. NoResponse sets it per workspace on request, at or above the review threshold."),
     confidence: RiskConfidence$zodSchema.describe("How much of the planned evidence answered; it says nothing about risk."),
     coverage: RiskCoverage$zodSchema.describe("Counts of planned source-identifier pairs by evidence outcome, deduplicated across signals and incomplete entries. These counts do not measure identity agreement or prove that processing is still running. A lane that was not searched is not an answered source."),
-    details: RiskDetails$zodSchema.optional().describe("Detailed view only (response_mode=detailed, which needs the detailed scope); a standard answer leaves it out. Merged observations without provider, source, origin, raw breach record, value or score."),
+    details: RiskDetails$zodSchema.optional().describe("Merged observations behind the summary, served only to a caller who may read evidence: no provider, source, origin, raw breach record or score."),
     policy_basis: literal("heuristic_unvalidated").default("heuristic_unvalidated").optional().describe("Labels the v0 policy as hand-authored and not statistically validated."),
     policy_version: string2().describe("Version of the hand-authored heuristic policy that produced the recommendation, for example 'risk-2026-10.7'. A workspace threshold override adds a +t<N> suffix, e.g. 'risk-2026-10.7+t3'."),
     reasons: array(RiskReason$zodSchema).describe("Every reason that fired: risk-raising reasons first, then neutral, then risk-lowering, each strongest impact band first and then by code. The policy's numeric weights are kept private, so a reason carries only its direction and impact band."),
@@ -51135,7 +51135,7 @@ var init_risk = __esm(() => {
     review_threshold: int().optional().describe("The score at which this answer's flow starts to recommend review. An answer nothing answered recommends review below it, with confidence unavailable. Absent from an answer stored before it was recorded."),
     score: int(),
     step_up_threshold: int().optional().describe("The score at which this answer's flow starts to recommend step_up. Absent from an answer stored before it was recorded."),
-    summary: RiskSummary$zodSchema.optional().describe("A few typed facts per identifier. Every fact is optional: absent means the evidence did not answer and makes no claim, while false or 0 is a definite answer. Lanes that do not exist yet leave their members absent.")
+    summary: RiskSummary$zodSchema.optional().describe("A few typed facts per identifier: an assessment's risk.summary, and an event screening attendee's lookup summary. Every fact is optional: absent means the evidence did not answer and makes no claim, while false or 0 is a definite answer.")
   }).describe("The one risk decision for this event. score is 0 (safe) to 100 (risky), set by the reasons that fired under a hand-set, versioned heuristic policy. Each reason carries its direction and impact band; the policy's weights are not published. Every answer with a recommendation carries it, and the top-level recommendation equals risk.recommendation. It names no source or provider.");
 });
 
@@ -61231,6 +61231,52 @@ var init_screeningfinding = __esm(() => {
   }).describe("Something the analyser flagged. band is capped by the strongest match among the profiles of its evidence: possible at most moderate, probable at most high. capped_from is the band the analyser gave when the cap lowered it.");
 });
 
+// src/models/screeninglookupcheckstatus.ts
+var ScreeningLookupCheckStatus$zodSchema;
+var init_screeninglookupcheckstatus = __esm(() => {
+  init_zod();
+  ScreeningLookupCheckStatus$zodSchema = _enum([
+    "found",
+    "not_found",
+    "partial",
+    "not_covered"
+  ]).describe("found: a source found the identifier. not_found: every source answered and none found it. partial: the sources that answered found nothing and the others did not answer. not_covered: no source answered. A lookup that failed reads partial or not_covered, not not_found.");
+});
+
+// src/models/screeninglookupcheck.ts
+var ScreeningLookupCheck$zodSchema;
+var init_screeninglookupcheck = __esm(() => {
+  init_zod();
+  init_failurereason();
+  init_identifiersearchkind();
+  init_lane();
+  init_screeninglookupcheckstatus();
+  ScreeningLookupCheck$zodSchema = object({
+    answered: int().describe("Sources that gave a definite answer."),
+    found: int().describe("Sources that found the identifier."),
+    identifier: IdentifierSearchKind$zodSchema,
+    lane: Lane$zodSchema.describe("An evidence lane: accounts (account presence for email and username), phone, breach, domain (the email domain's registration) and ip."),
+    reason: FailureReason$zodSchema.optional().describe("Why a signal or source did not produce a definite found/not_found. timed_out means the source missed the request deadline; a continuation may still settle it. deferred means the (source, identifier) pair is async-only and was not attempted on the synchronous path; a continuation settles it."),
+    sources: int().describe("Sources asked: none when no source could be, as when the source is stopped or your workspace refuses it."),
+    status: ScreeningLookupCheckStatus$zodSchema.describe("found: a source found the identifier. not_found: every source answered and none found it. partial: the sources that answered found nothing and the others did not answer. not_covered: no source answered. A lookup that failed reads partial or not_covered, not not_found.")
+  }).describe("What came of one lane of the lookups for one identifier.");
+});
+
+// src/models/screeninglookup.ts
+var ScreeningLookup$zodSchema;
+var init_screeninglookup = __esm(() => {
+  init_zod();
+  init_riskdetails();
+  init_risksummary();
+  init_screeninglookupcheck();
+  ScreeningLookup$zodSchema = object({
+    checks: array(ScreeningLookupCheck$zodSchema).describe("Each lane each identifier was looked up in, identifiers in the order email, phone, username and lanes in the order accounts, phone, breach, domain. Every lane the attendee's identifiers are looked up in is listed: one that no source answered, or that no source could be asked in, is not_covered. Empty when the attendee has no email, phone or handle to look up."),
+    details: RiskDetails$zodSchema.optional().describe("Merged observations behind the summary, served only to a caller who may read evidence: no provider, source, origin, raw breach record or score."),
+    looked_at: string2().describe("When the lookups ran."),
+    summary: RiskSummary$zodSchema.optional().describe("A few typed facts per identifier: an assessment's risk.summary, and an event screening attendee's lookup summary. Every fact is optional: absent means the evidence did not answer and makes no claim, while false or 0 is a definite answer.")
+  }).describe("What the signup check's lookups found for an attendee: account presence for the email, phone and usernames (the attendee's handles), the phone lookup, the email domain's registration and the breach search. Context and coverage for the reviewer, not a finding: nothing here sets a band or a match state.");
+});
+
 // src/models/mediatype.ts
 var MediaType$zodSchema;
 var init_mediatype = __esm(() => {
@@ -61375,12 +61421,14 @@ var init_attendeereport = __esm(() => {
   init_attendeereview();
   init_otherevents();
   init_screeningfinding();
+  init_screeninglookup();
   init_screeningmedia();
   init_screeningpost();
   init_screeningprofile();
   AttendeeReport$zodSchema = object({
     attendee: Attendee$zodSchema.describe("An attendee and where their screening and review stand."),
     findings: array(ScreeningFinding$zodSchema).describe("What the latest screening flagged, most severe first, each citing its evidence."),
+    lookup: ScreeningLookup$zodSchema.optional().describe("What the signup check's lookups found for an attendee: account presence for the email, phone and usernames (the attendee's handles), the phone lookup, the email domain's registration and the breach search. Context and coverage for the reviewer, not a finding: nothing here sets a band or a match state."),
     media: array(ScreeningMedia$zodSchema).describe("The images and videos the findings cite."),
     other_events: OtherEvents$zodSchema.describe("Where else in the environment the attendee appears, read live from those events: deleting one removes it here."),
     posts: array(ScreeningPost$zodSchema).describe("The posts the findings cite."),
@@ -73323,7 +73371,7 @@ endpoint.verification sends a signed challenge now and answers whether the endpo
 function createMCPServer(deps) {
   const server = new McpServer({
     name: "NoResponse",
-    version: "0.11.23"
+    version: "0.11.24"
   });
   const getClient = deps.getSDK || (() => new NoResponseCore({
     security: deps.security,
@@ -82732,7 +82780,7 @@ var routes = buildRouteMap({
 var app = buildApplication(routes, {
   name: "mcp",
   versionInfo: {
-    currentVersion: "0.11.23"
+    currentVersion: "0.11.24"
   }
 });
 run(app, process3.argv.slice(2), buildContext(process3));
@@ -82740,5 +82788,5 @@ export {
   app
 };
 
-//# debugId=9D516E2EFB95691564756E2164756E21
+//# debugId=6C6CAAD99981215E64756E2164756E21
 //# sourceMappingURL=mcp-server.js.map