@nodaro/shared 2.0.1 → 2.0.3

package/package.json

@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
 {
   "name": "@nodaro/shared",
-  "version": "2.0.1",
+  "version": "2.0.3",
   "description": "Shared types, model catalog, wire contracts, and structural vocabularies for the Nodaro platform and SDK.",
   "type": "module",
   "license": "Apache-2.0",

package/src/__tests__/scraper-actors.test.ts

@@ -56,12 +56,15 @@ describe("scraper-actors", () => {
     }
   })
 
+  // Values match `STATIC_CREDIT_COSTS` / `model_pricing`; the backend-side guard
+  // `shared-credit-table-sync.test.ts` is what keeps the two equal. This one only
+  // pins that every SKU is present and priced.
   it("credit costs include bare fallback + every composite SKU", () => {
-    expect(SCRAPER_CREDIT_COSTS["web-scrape"]).toBe(2)
-    expect(SCRAPER_CREDIT_COSTS["web-scrape:google-search"]).toBe(3)
-    expect(SCRAPER_CREDIT_COSTS["web-scrape:content-crawler"]).toBe(1)
-    expect(SCRAPER_CREDIT_COSTS["web-scrape:content-crawler:site"]).toBe(5)
-    expect(SCRAPER_CREDIT_COSTS["web-scrape:instagram"]).toBe(1)
-    expect(SCRAPER_CREDIT_COSTS["web-scrape:tiktok"]).toBe(1)
+    expect(SCRAPER_CREDIT_COSTS["web-scrape"]).toBe(20)
+    expect(SCRAPER_CREDIT_COSTS["web-scrape:google-search"]).toBe(30)
+    expect(SCRAPER_CREDIT_COSTS["web-scrape:content-crawler"]).toBe(10)
+    expect(SCRAPER_CREDIT_COSTS["web-scrape:content-crawler:site"]).toBe(50)
+    expect(SCRAPER_CREDIT_COSTS["web-scrape:instagram"]).toBe(10)
+    expect(SCRAPER_CREDIT_COSTS["web-scrape:tiktok"]).toBe(10)
   })
 })

package/src/__tests__/video-analysis-catalog-sync.test.ts

@@ -88,9 +88,10 @@ describe("bare video-analysis node-type credit id", () => {
     }
     // The migration writes this number; keep them in lockstep (277 wrote 200,
     // 279 wrote 739, 283 wrote 346, 284 wrote 350 — `smart` owns the ceiling and
-    // gained the continuity pass — and the credit re-denomination scaled it x10
-    // to 3500, the value 288 now writes).
-    expect(ceiling).toBe(3500)
+    // gained the continuity pass — 288 wrote 3500 as a x10 of that, and 293
+    // corrects it to 3496 by RE-DERIVING `smart:600s` from the plugin formula
+    // instead of scaling it, same as every other row in the table).
+    expect(ceiling).toBe(3496)
   })
 
   it("the bare id still bounds the default tier at the ceiling bucket", () => {

package/src/model-catalog.ts

@@ -144,11 +144,14 @@ export interface ModelRecommendation {
 export const MODEL_RECOMMENDATIONS: readonly ModelRecommendation[] = [
   // image
   { intent: "best for typography / logos / text-heavy", modelIds: ["nano-banana-pro", "gpt-image-2"], note: "Nano Banana Pro for diagrams / complex text; GPT Image 2 for logos and short copy." },
-  { intent: "cheapest realistic image", modelIds: ["z-image", "qwen", "imagen4-fast"], note: "Z-Image is the cheapest at 1 credit. Qwen / Imagen4 Fast for slightly higher quality." },
+  // Notes name the RANKING, not the price — the price sits in the generated
+  // table directly below them and in `pricing`, so restating it here just
+  // creates a copy that rots (this one said "1 credit" long after it was 2).
+  { intent: "cheapest realistic image", modelIds: ["z-image", "qwen", "imagen4-fast"], note: "Z-Image is the cheapest. Qwen / Imagen4 Fast for slightly higher quality." },
   { intent: "highest fidelity image", modelIds: ["nano-banana-pro", "imagen4-ultra", "flux-flex"], note: "Pick by family preference; all three are premium tiers." },
   { intent: "image edit / restyle", modelIds: ["flux-kontext", "ideogram-remix", "seedream-5-pro-i2i"], note: "Flux Kontext preserves identity; Ideogram Remix is character-aware; Seedream 5 Pro for instruction-based edits (5 Lite is the budget option)." },
   { intent: "highest-resolution image (4K / 8K)", modelIds: ["topaz-image-upscale", "nano-banana-pro", "gpt-image-2"], note: "Generate at native then Topaz upscale for 8K." },
-  { intent: "background removal / cutout", modelIds: ["recraft-remove-bg"], note: "1 credit, no prompt needed." },
+  { intent: "background removal / cutout", modelIds: ["recraft-remove-bg"], note: "Cheap, no prompt needed." },
   // video
   { intent: "best cinematic video", modelIds: ["veo3", "kling-3.0", "seedance-2"], note: "VEO 3.1 Quality for premium narrative; Kling 3.0 for music-synced motion; Seedance 2 for reference-driven consistency." },
   { intent: "cheap batch video clips", modelIds: ["veo3.1", "wan-turbo", "bytedance-lite"], note: "VEO 3.1 Fast is the best price/quality balance with native audio." },
@@ -1869,11 +1872,11 @@ const VIDEO_MODELS: Record<string, ModelCatalogEntry> = {
     description: "Our most advanced analysis tier — multiple analysis engines combined into one result for maximum completeness and accuracy. Billed per duration bucket.",
     useCases: ["video-analysis", "shot-list", "premium", "most-complete"],
     pricing: [
-      { identifier: "video-analysis:mixed", credits: 630, note: "10-min ceiling (no duration given)" },
-      { identifier: "video-analysis:mixed:60s", credits: 110 },
-      { identifier: "video-analysis:mixed:180s", credits: 150 },
-      { identifier: "video-analysis:mixed:360s", credits: 380 },
-      { identifier: "video-analysis:mixed:600s", credits: 630, note: "10-min ceiling" },
+      { identifier: "video-analysis:mixed", credits: 621, note: "10-min ceiling (no duration given)" },
+      { identifier: "video-analysis:mixed:60s", credits: 104 },
+      { identifier: "video-analysis:mixed:180s", credits: 142 },
+      { identifier: "video-analysis:mixed:360s", credits: 372 },
+      { identifier: "video-analysis:mixed:600s", credits: 621, note: "10-min ceiling" },
     ],
   },
   // SMART — the accuracy tier, and the only one that does not rely on voting.
@@ -1890,11 +1893,11 @@ const VIDEO_MODELS: Record<string, ModelCatalogEntry> = {
     description: "Highest-accuracy analysis — a single deep pass that reads the footage frame by frame, finds its own shot boundaries, and identifies the cast by appearance. Best choice when the shot list will drive regeneration. Billed per duration bucket.",
     useCases: ["video-analysis", "shot-list", "premium", "most-accurate"],
     pricing: [
-      { identifier: "video-analysis:smart", credits: 3500, note: "10-min ceiling (no duration given)" },
-      { identifier: "video-analysis:smart:60s", credits: 460 },
-      { identifier: "video-analysis:smart:180s", credits: 980 },
-      { identifier: "video-analysis:smart:360s", credits: 2110 },
-      { identifier: "video-analysis:smart:600s", credits: 3500, note: "10-min ceiling" },
+      { identifier: "video-analysis:smart", credits: 3496, note: "10-min ceiling (no duration given)" },
+      { identifier: "video-analysis:smart:60s", credits: 454 },
+      { identifier: "video-analysis:smart:180s", credits: 975 },
+      { identifier: "video-analysis:smart:360s", credits: 2105 },
+      { identifier: "video-analysis:smart:600s", credits: 3496, note: "10-min ceiling" },
     ],
   },
 }

package/src/pipeline-defaults.ts

@@ -72,12 +72,18 @@ export const TIER_PIPELINE_PARALLELISM: Record<string, number> = {
 }
 
 // Tier → default hard cost cap when max_cost_credits omitted (Architecture §6.6.3)
+//
+// These are a FRACTION OF THE TIER'S GRANT, so they move with `TIER_CREDITS`:
+// the 2026-07-30 ×10 re-denomination multiplied every grant, and leaving these
+// behind would have silently tightened each cap tenfold — a basic-tier pipeline
+// would abort at 300 credits out of a 4,500-credit grant, i.e. 6% of the plan
+// the user paid for, instead of the intended two-thirds.
 export const TIER_MAX_PIPELINE_COST_CREDITS: Record<string, number> = {
   free: 0,
-  basic: 300,
-  standard: 800,
-  pro: 2000,
-  business: 5000,
+  basic: 3000,
+  standard: 8000,
+  pro: 20000,
+  business: 50000,
 }
 
 // Per-stage soft timeout (matches workflow-orchestration)

package/src/scraper-actors.ts

@@ -16,15 +16,20 @@ export const SCRAPER_ACTOR_LABELS: Record<ScraperActorId, string> = {
   "rss":             "RSS Feed",
 }
 
-/** Credit costs per composite SKU — must stay in sync with STATIC_CREDIT_COSTS in backend. */
+/** Credit costs per composite SKU — must stay in sync with STATIC_CREDIT_COSTS in backend.
+ *
+ * "Must stay in sync" was doing no work: these were left at the pre-2026-07-30
+ * credit base while the backend moved, so every SKU here read a tenth of the
+ * real price. Values below are copied from `model_pricing`, which is what the
+ * user is actually charged. */
 export const SCRAPER_CREDIT_COSTS: Record<string, number> = {
-  "web-scrape": 2,
-  "web-scrape:google-search": 3,
-  "web-scrape:content-crawler": 1,
-  "web-scrape:content-crawler:site": 5,
-  "web-scrape:instagram": 1,
-  "web-scrape:tiktok": 1,
-  "web-scrape:rss": 1,
+  "web-scrape": 20,
+  "web-scrape:google-search": 30,
+  "web-scrape:content-crawler": 10,
+  "web-scrape:content-crawler:site": 50,
+  "web-scrape:instagram": 10,
+  "web-scrape:tiktok": 10,
+  "web-scrape:rss": 10,
 }
 
 export function isScraperActor(value: unknown): value is ScraperActorId {

package/src/video-analysis-pricing.ts

@@ -48,11 +48,18 @@ export const VIDEO_ANALYSIS_WINDOW = { LEN: WINDOW_LEN, STRIDE: WINDOW_STRIDE, O
  * Keep in sync with
  * `docs/nodes/processing-video/video-analysis.md`.
  */
-// RE-DERIVED from the cloud-plugins formula at the new credit base — NOT a
-// mechanical x10 of the old table. The formula ceils USD into credits, so a
-// 10x finer base rounds LESS: the 60s flash bucket is 23, where x10 of the old
-// 3 would have been 30 (a ~30% over-charge). A CI cross-check in the plugin
-// asserts this table equals what its videoAnalysisBucketCredits produces.
+// EVERY row here is RE-DERIVED from the cloud-plugins formula at the current
+// credit base — never a mechanical x10 of an older table. The formula ceils USD
+// into credits, so a 10x finer base rounds LESS: the 60s flash bucket is 23,
+// where x10 of the old 3 would have been 30 (a ~30% over-charge).
+//
+// That applies to the SENTINEL rows (`mixed:*`, `smart:*`) exactly as much as to
+// the per-model rows. They were briefly shipped as a x10 on the reasoning that
+// they sit outside the plugin's cross-check loop — but being outside the loop
+// makes a row UNGUARDED, not exempt: `videoAnalysisBucketCredits` computes them
+// from the same roll plan, so they are formula-derived too (mixed:60s is 104,
+// not 110). The plugin's cost test now covers sentinels as well, so this class
+// of drift fails CI instead of shipping.
 export const VIDEO_ANALYSIS_BUCKET_CREDITS: Record<string, number> = {
   // Legacy fast-tier model (pre-2026-07) — kept for stored raw-id configs.
   "video-analysis:gemini-3-flash:60s": 23,
@@ -72,18 +79,18 @@ export const VIDEO_ANALYSIS_BUCKET_CREDITS: Record<string, number> = {
   // Mixed tiers (`mixed` + `mixed-fast`) share ONE credit family — they are
   // variants of the same engine plan (plan internals live in the private
   // analysis plugin). Admin-tunable via model_pricing like every other row.
-  "video-analysis:mixed:60s": 110,
-  "video-analysis:mixed:180s": 150,
-  "video-analysis:mixed:360s": 380,
-  "video-analysis:mixed:600s": 630,
+  "video-analysis:mixed:60s": 104,
+  "video-analysis:mixed:180s": 142,
+  "video-analysis:mixed:360s": 372,
+  "video-analysis:mixed:600s": 621,
   // SMART — the one native-transport plan: a single pass with reasoning and
   // frame sampling turned all the way up. Priced well above the economy tiers
   // because it genuinely costs more to run, and it is the only tier whose
   // accuracy was measured against a hand-counted edit list.
-  "video-analysis:smart:60s": 460,
-  "video-analysis:smart:180s": 980,
-  "video-analysis:smart:360s": 2110,
-  "video-analysis:smart:600s": 3500,
+  "video-analysis:smart:60s": 454,
+  "video-analysis:smart:180s": 975,
+  "video-analysis:smart:360s": 2105,
+  "video-analysis:smart:600s": 3496,
 }
 
 /**