@nexalink/carecompass-sdk 0.7.0 → 0.7.1
This diff represents the content of publicly available package versions that have been released to one of the supported registries. The information contained in this diff is provided for informational purposes only and reflects changes between package versions as they appear in their respective public registries.
- package/README.md +16 -18
- package/dist/version.js +1 -1
- package/package.json +2 -2
package/README.md
CHANGED
|
@@ -1,17 +1,19 @@
|
|
|
1
1
|
# CareCompass SDK
|
|
2
2
|
|
|
3
|
-
CareCompass is embeddable
|
|
3
|
+
CareCompass by Nexalink is an embeddable SDK for AI-assisted medical-coding review, built for behavioral-health EHR and RCM platforms.
|
|
4
4
|
|
|
5
|
-
It
|
|
5
|
+
It brings coding suggestions, references from the payer policies your team supplies and approves, and missing-documentation flags into your existing product. A qualified human reviewer makes the final coding decision, and that decision is recorded.
|
|
6
6
|
|
|
7
|
-
|
|
7
|
+
Your team can add coding review without building and maintaining the supporting AI runtime and policy-research tools itself. Your team remains responsible for approved policies, its integration, and qualified review. Pilot scope, goals, and pricing are agreed with your team before starting; real patient data requires security review and a signed BAA.
|
|
8
8
|
|
|
9
9
|
The SDK gives teams two integration paths:
|
|
10
10
|
|
|
11
11
|
- **Headless core** for product teams that want full control over their own UI, workflow, state management, and rendering.
|
|
12
|
-
- **Optional UI kit** for teams that want
|
|
12
|
+
- **Optional UI kit** for teams that want embedded review components and a branded experience they can customize over time.
|
|
13
13
|
|
|
14
|
-
CareCompass
|
|
14
|
+
CareCompass supports coding review; it does not submit claims, bill payers, diagnose, or replace qualified reviewers. Prior authorization and patient navigation are future directions, not the current product. Generic chat APIs described below are integration primitives, not a promise of those workflows.
|
|
15
|
+
|
|
16
|
+
See the [CareCompass product overview](https://www.nexalink.care/carecompass), [public developer documentation](https://www.nexalink.care/developer/documentation), and [pilot contact page](https://www.nexalink.care/enterprise/signup).
|
|
15
17
|
|
|
16
18
|
## Customer Documentation
|
|
17
19
|
|
|
@@ -34,9 +36,9 @@ the SDK surface.
|
|
|
34
36
|
|
|
35
37
|
## Why Teams Choose CareCompass
|
|
36
38
|
|
|
37
|
-
|
|
39
|
+
Getting an AI prototype working is only the beginning. A coding-review feature also needs approved policy evidence, data handling, and a reliable human review process.
|
|
38
40
|
|
|
39
|
-
CareCompass
|
|
41
|
+
CareCompass supplies supporting components your team would otherwise need to build and maintain:
|
|
40
42
|
|
|
41
43
|
- secure hosted runtime APIs
|
|
42
44
|
- tenant and environment routing
|
|
@@ -48,22 +50,18 @@ CareCompass packages the healthcare-specific infrastructure layer that most team
|
|
|
48
50
|
- white-label UI support
|
|
49
51
|
- operational onboarding for healthcare use cases
|
|
50
52
|
|
|
51
|
-
|
|
53
|
+
Product teams can focus on their own product while qualified reviewers assess suggestions alongside the approved evidence.
|
|
52
54
|
|
|
53
55
|
## What You Can Build
|
|
54
56
|
|
|
55
|
-
|
|
57
|
+
The current product supports a defined medical-coding review workflow inside your existing healthcare software:
|
|
56
58
|
|
|
57
|
-
-
|
|
58
|
-
-
|
|
59
|
-
-
|
|
60
|
-
-
|
|
61
|
-
- RCM and prior authorization support tools
|
|
62
|
-
- onboarding and support flows for digital health products
|
|
63
|
-
- internal operations copilots for healthcare teams
|
|
64
|
-
- white-labeled AI assistants inside existing healthcare applications
|
|
59
|
+
- Submit structured encounter information for an authorized coding workflow.
|
|
60
|
+
- Show suggested codes with supporting policy references and documentation gaps.
|
|
61
|
+
- Route unsupported or uncertain cases for qualified review.
|
|
62
|
+
- Record a qualified reviewer's approval, edits, rejection, or escalation.
|
|
65
63
|
|
|
66
|
-
|
|
64
|
+
Your team owns the product experience, supplies and approves the policies, and keeps the final coding decision with a qualified reviewer.
|
|
67
65
|
|
|
68
66
|
## What You Avoid Building
|
|
69
67
|
|
package/dist/version.js
CHANGED
|
@@ -1,3 +1,3 @@
|
|
|
1
|
-
export const CARECOMPASS_SDK_VERSION = "0.7.
|
|
1
|
+
export const CARECOMPASS_SDK_VERSION = "0.7.1"; // x-release-please-version
|
|
2
2
|
export const CARECOMPASS_COMPONENT_VERSION = "1.0.0";
|
|
3
3
|
export const CARECOMPASS_TELEMETRY_CONTRACT_VERSION = "1.1.0";
|
package/package.json
CHANGED
|
@@ -1,7 +1,7 @@
|
|
|
1
1
|
{
|
|
2
2
|
"name": "@nexalink/carecompass-sdk",
|
|
3
|
-
"version": "0.7.
|
|
4
|
-
"description": "
|
|
3
|
+
"version": "0.7.1",
|
|
4
|
+
"description": "CareCompass by Nexalink: embeddable SDK for AI-assisted medical-coding review with payer-policy references and a qualified human reviewer's final decision.",
|
|
5
5
|
"type": "module",
|
|
6
6
|
"packageManager": "bun@1.3.9",
|
|
7
7
|
"homepage": "https://nexalink.care",
|