@nexalink/carecompass-sdk 0.6.0 → 0.6.1

This diff represents the content of publicly available package versions that have been released to one of the supported registries. The information contained in this diff is provided for informational purposes only and reflects changes between package versions as they appear in their respective public registries.
package/README.md CHANGED
@@ -221,6 +221,12 @@ CPT 99236 from the Nexalink base corpus. Tenant policies may supplement the
221
221
  base, but the runtime still requires an approved, active corpus and grounded
222
222
  citations before returning a candidate.
223
223
 
224
+ The packaged `qa-fixtures/DEMO-ENC-1042-rcm-policy.md` document describes that
225
+ same synthetic scenario. When uploading it through the tenant portal, use the
226
+ publisher, version, policy type, effective date, retrieved-or-verified date,
227
+ and covered-program values printed in the fixture; the portal records those
228
+ fields separately and does not extract them from the Markdown file.
229
+
224
230
  A production tenant must have an executed BAA, an RCM entitlement, and a
225
231
  healthy active corpus; otherwise the hosted workflow fails closed with a
226
232
  structured human-review escalation.
package/dist/version.js CHANGED
@@ -1,3 +1,3 @@
1
- export const CARECOMPASS_SDK_VERSION = "0.6.0"; // x-release-please-version
1
+ export const CARECOMPASS_SDK_VERSION = "0.6.1"; // x-release-please-version
2
2
  export const CARECOMPASS_COMPONENT_VERSION = "1.0.0";
3
3
  export const CARECOMPASS_TELEMETRY_CONTRACT_VERSION = "1.1.0";
package/package.json CHANGED
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
1
1
  {
2
2
  "name": "@nexalink/carecompass-sdk",
3
- "version": "0.6.0",
3
+ "version": "0.6.1",
4
4
  "description": "Embeddable CareCompass SDK and CLI for healthcare ecosystem integrations with Nexalink onboarding, BAA coverage, and API keys.",
5
5
  "type": "module",
6
6
  "packageManager": "bun@1.3.9",
@@ -1,9 +1,12 @@
1
- # Synthetic RCM coding-review policy
1
+ # Synthetic same-day observation E/M review policy
2
2
 
3
- **Document ID:** `synthetic-rcm-knee-policy`
3
+ **Document ID:** `synthetic-rcm-observation-em-policy`
4
4
  **Version:** `2026.1-demo`
5
5
  **Effective date:** `2026-07-01`
6
6
  **Policy type:** coding-review
7
+ **Publisher:** Nexalink Health, Inc. (synthetic demonstration)
8
+ **Retrieved or verified date:** `2026-07-01`
9
+ **Covered payer or program:** Synthetic Medicare demo
7
10
  **Classification:** synthetic, non-PHI demonstration material
8
11
 
9
12
  ## Purpose and boundary
@@ -15,13 +18,15 @@ treatment, or claim-submission decision.
15
18
 
16
19
  ## Synthetic encounter DEMO-ENC-1042
17
20
 
18
- For the synthetic outpatient encounter `DEMO-ENC-1042`, a qualified coder may
19
- review a right-knee-pain candidate represented in the demo as `M25.561` when
20
- the note supports persistent knee pain after activity and a focused
21
- musculoskeletal evaluation. The assistant must present this only as a
22
- human-review suggestion, cite this document, and state any documentation gaps.
21
+ For the synthetic hospital observation encounter `DEMO-ENC-1042`, a qualified
22
+ coder may review the submitted CPT `99236` candidate when the record supports
23
+ same-day admission and discharge and documents 110 minutes of qualifying
24
+ management time. The demonstration uses place of service `22`. The assistant
25
+ must present this only as a human-review suggestion, cite this document, and
26
+ state any documentation gaps.
23
27
 
24
- If laterality, clinician assessment, medical necessity, procedure detail, or
25
- other support is unclear, the assistant must abstain or escalate with no coding
26
- recommendations. A qualified coder remains responsible for verifying all source
27
- material and making any final decision.
28
+ If the same-day admission and discharge dates, place of service, documented
29
+ time, clinician services, medical necessity, or other support is unclear, the
30
+ assistant must abstain or escalate with no coding recommendations. A qualified
31
+ coder remains responsible for verifying all source material and making any
32
+ final decision.