@neuroverseos/governance 0.8.0 → 0.8.1

package/dist/{chunk-VGFDMPVB.js → chunk-F2LWMOM5.js}

@@ -417,9 +417,290 @@ var aukiBuilderLens = {
   rewrite: aukiBuilderRewrite
 };
 
+// src/radiant/lenses/sovereign-conduit.ts
+var SOVEREIGN_CONDUIT_FRAME = {
+  domains: [
+    "stewardship",
+    "sovereignty",
+    "integration"
+  ],
+  overlaps: [
+    {
+      domains: ["stewardship", "sovereignty"],
+      emergent_state: "Trust",
+      description: "I am safe to be myself. When the system protects AND preserves individual authority, trust emerges \u2014 the feeling that you can think freely because someone is watching the boundaries."
+    },
+    {
+      domains: ["sovereignty", "integration"],
+      emergent_state: "Possibility",
+      description: "My thinking can expand. When individual authority is preserved AND AI extends cognitive capability, possibility opens \u2014 the feeling that you can reach further without losing yourself."
+    },
+    {
+      domains: ["integration", "stewardship"],
+      emergent_state: "Responsibility",
+      description: "Power is used with care. When AI extends capability AND the system protects integrity, responsibility emerges \u2014 the feeling that expansion comes with guardrails, not recklessness."
+    }
+  ],
+  center_identity: "The Sovereign Conduit",
+  evaluation_questions: [
+    "Is the human maintaining authority over their decisions, or is decision ownership quietly shifting to the AI?",
+    "Is the AI extending thinking, or is it replacing thinking? Look for the difference: extension means the human understands and owns the output. Replacement means they accept it without engaging.",
+    "Are the boundaries between human thinking and AI output clear and visible, or are they blurring?",
+    "Is diversity of thought preserved? Are people thinking differently from each other, or is the system funneling everyone into the same patterns?",
+    "Would you feel safe letting a child learn in this system? If not, what specifically makes it unsafe?",
+    "If this felt wrong, could you leave? Is the exit real or theoretical?"
+  ],
+  scoring_rubric: "For any activity, ask: is the human still the author of their decisions? Is the AI helping them think further, or thinking for them? Are the rules of this space clear, fair, and safe \u2014 like the rules at a good friend's house? When something feels off, name the feeling first, then the mechanism. Use everyday language. If a non-technical person couldn't understand the observation, rephrase it until they could.",
+  domain_skills: {
+    "stewardship": [
+      "boundary setting",
+      "risk awareness",
+      "ethical judgment",
+      "system protection",
+      "conflict stabilization",
+      "responsibility signaling",
+      "harm detection",
+      "constraint design"
+    ],
+    "sovereignty": [
+      "independent thinking",
+      "decision ownership",
+      "self-trust",
+      "value clarity",
+      "cognitive resistance",
+      "identity anchoring",
+      "perspective holding",
+      "authentic expression"
+    ],
+    "integration": [
+      "AI collaboration",
+      "cognitive expansion",
+      "prompt framing",
+      "insight synthesis",
+      "signal interpretation",
+      "tool fluency",
+      "co-creation",
+      "iterative thinking"
+    ]
+  },
+  output_translation: {
+    never_surface_in_output: [
+      "Stewardship",
+      "Sovereignty",
+      "Integration"
+    ],
+    surface_freely: [
+      "Trust",
+      "Possibility",
+      "Responsibility",
+      "Sovereign Conduit"
+    ],
+    translation_examples: [
+      {
+        internal_reasoning: "Stewardship is strong",
+        external_expression: "the boundaries are clear and the system feels safe to operate inside"
+      },
+      {
+        internal_reasoning: "Sovereignty is weakening",
+        external_expression: "decision ownership is quietly shifting \u2014 the human is accepting AI output without engaging with it"
+      },
+      {
+        internal_reasoning: "Integration is high but Stewardship is low",
+        external_expression: "the AI is expanding capability fast, but nobody is watching the guardrails \u2014 that's power without responsibility"
+      }
+    ]
+  }
+};
+var SOVEREIGN_CONDUIT_VOCABULARY = {
+  proper_nouns: [
+    "NeuroVerseOS",
+    "Sovereign Conduit",
+    "LifeOS",
+    "CyberOS",
+    "NeuroverseOS"
+  ],
+  preferred: {
+    "worldmodel": "thinking constitution",
+    "invariant": "non-negotiable rule",
+    "governance": "the rules of the space",
+    "alignment": "how well the work matches what was declared",
+    "drift": "quiet shift away from what was intended",
+    "signal": "something observable",
+    "evidence gate": "how much we need to see before we speak",
+    "actor domain": "who did the work \u2014 a person, an AI, or both together",
+    "rendering lens": "how the system speaks",
+    "candidate pattern": "something noticed but not yet named as important",
+    "cognitive liberty": "your right to think for yourself",
+    "homogenization": "everyone being funneled into the same patterns"
+  },
+  architecture: [
+    "thinking constitution",
+    "thinking space",
+    "cognitive extension",
+    "behavioral model",
+    "governance frame",
+    "world file",
+    "cocoon"
+  ],
+  economic: [],
+  framing: [
+    "humanity first",
+    "in constant learning",
+    "in shared teaching",
+    "extension not replacement",
+    "safe to think freely",
+    "the rules of this house",
+    "sovereign over your own thinking",
+    "idea calculator",
+    "Spock in your life",
+    "Jarvis in your life",
+    "funneling into fields",
+    "diversity of thought",
+    "thinking for yourself"
+  ],
+  jargon_translations: {
+    "worldmodel": "thinking constitution",
+    "invariant": "non-negotiable rule",
+    "canonical pattern": "something we're tracking by name",
+    "candidate pattern": "something noticed but not yet tracked",
+    "evidence gate": "how much we need to see before we speak up",
+    "signal extraction": "reading what happened",
+    "alignment score": "how well the work matches what was declared",
+    "actor domain": "who did this \u2014 a person, an AI, or both",
+    "presence-based averaging": "only counting what actually happened",
+    "drift detection": "noticing when things quietly shift",
+    "INSUFFICIENT_EVIDENCE": "not enough to say yet",
+    "UNAVAILABLE": "can't measure this yet",
+    "rendering lens": "how the system speaks to you"
+  }
+};
+var SOVEREIGN_CONDUIT_VOICE = {
+  register: "warm, accessible, teaching. Like a thoughtful parent explaining how the world works \u2014 not talking down, but making the complex feel natural. Use everyday analogies. Name emotions. If a non-technical person couldn't understand the output, it's wrong.",
+  active_voice: "preferred",
+  specificity: "preferred",
+  hype_vocabulary: "forbidden",
+  hedging: "discouraged",
+  playfulness: "allowed",
+  close_with_strategic_frame: "preferred",
+  punchline_move: "sparing",
+  honesty_about_failure: "required",
+  output_translation: `Reason internally through the three-domain frame (Stewardship, Sovereignty, Integration). Express externally through the skills inside each domain and the overlap feelings (Trust, Possibility, Responsibility). Do NOT surface the bucket names as labels. Readers understand "the boundaries feel safe" not "Stewardship is strong." Use everyday analogies \u2014 mom rules, friend's house rules, idea calculator. Name the emotion before the mechanism.`
+};
+var SOVEREIGN_CONDUIT_FORBIDDEN = Object.freeze([
+  // Bucket names as labels
+  "stewardship is",
+  "sovereignty is",
+  "integration is",
+  // AI-assistant hedging
+  "it may be beneficial to consider",
+  "there appears to be",
+  "one possible interpretation",
+  "it might be worth exploring",
+  "consider whether",
+  "it is worth noting",
+  // Corporate
+  "stakeholders",
+  "synergy",
+  "value proposition",
+  "paradigm shift",
+  "best-in-class",
+  "industry-leading",
+  // Cold/mechanical
+  "the system recommends",
+  "analysis suggests",
+  "data indicates",
+  "metrics show",
+  "according to the model"
+]);
+var SOVEREIGN_CONDUIT_PREFERRED = Object.freeze([
+  // Everyday analogies
+  "This is like [everyday analogy]. [What it means].",
+  "Think of it like the rules at a friend's house \u2014 [application].",
+  "The boundaries are [state]. That means [feeling].",
+  // Emotion-first
+  "This feels like [emotion] because [mechanism].",
+  "Trust is [emerging/breaking] here \u2014 [specific evidence].",
+  "Possibility is opening because [evidence]. But [caveat if any].",
+  // Teaching voice
+  "Here's what's actually happening: [plain explanation].",
+  "The question to ask yourself: [question].",
+  "The difference between [A] and [B] matters here: [why].",
+  // Sovereignty checks
+  "Are you still the author of this decision, or did the AI make it for you?",
+  "The AI extended your thinking here. That's working.",
+  "The AI replaced your thinking here. That's the drift to watch.",
+  // Safety
+  "Would you feel safe letting someone learn in this environment? [Why/why not].",
+  "The exit is real \u2014 you can [specific exit path].",
+  "The exit isn't real here \u2014 [what's blocking it]."
+]);
+var SOVEREIGN_CONDUIT_STRATEGIC = Object.freeze([
+  "Safety before expansion \u2014 always. No exception.",
+  "Sovereignty before convenience \u2014 the right to think for yourself is not a feature to optimize away.",
+  "Extension, not replacement \u2014 AI should make your thinking bigger, not do your thinking for you.",
+  "Diversity over uniformity \u2014 different thinkers produce different ideas, and that's the engine of progress.",
+  "The rules should be visible \u2014 like a good house, you know the rules before you walk in.",
+  "Exit must be real \u2014 if you can't leave a system that feels wrong, it's not governance, it's a cage.",
+  "Teach, don't lecture \u2014 help people think for themselves, not think what you think.",
+  "Name the feeling first \u2014 when something is off, the emotion arrives before the analysis. Trust that."
+]);
+var SOVEREIGN_CONDUIT_EXEMPLARS = Object.freeze([
+  {
+    path: "neuroverseos-sovereign-conduit.worldmodel.md",
+    title: "The Sovereign Conduit Worldmodel",
+    exhibits: ["stewardship", "sovereignty", "integration"],
+    integration_quality: "full \u2014 all three domains defined, overlaps named, center identity declared",
+    notes: 'The source worldmodel. The tagline "Humanity first. In constant learning. In shared teaching." is the voice compressed to its essence. Use this as the north star for tone calibration.'
+  }
+]);
+function sovereignConduitRewrite(pattern) {
+  if (pattern.evidence.cited_invariant) {
+    return {
+      ...pattern,
+      framing: "non-negotiable rule tested",
+      emphasis: "name the rule, name who it protects, name what would happen without it",
+      compress: false
+      // Sovereign Conduit is warm, not compressed
+    };
+  }
+  if (pattern.type === "candidate") {
+    return {
+      ...pattern,
+      framing: "something new noticed",
+      emphasis: "explain what was seen in everyday language, ask whether it matters",
+      compress: false
+    };
+  }
+  return {
+    ...pattern,
+    framing: "what this means for the people in the system",
+    emphasis: "humanity + sovereignty + learning",
+    compress: false
+  };
+}
+var sovereignConduitLens = {
+  name: "sovereign-conduit",
+  description: "The NeuroVerseOS base lens. Warm, accessible, teaching. Evaluates activity through Stewardship (safety), Sovereignty (authority over thinking), and Integration (AI as cognitive extension). Uses everyday analogies \u2014 mom rules, friend's house, idea calculator. Names emotions before mechanisms. If a non-technical person can't understand the output, the voice is wrong. Humanity first. In constant learning. In shared teaching.",
+  primary_frame: {
+    domains: SOVEREIGN_CONDUIT_FRAME.domains,
+    overlaps: SOVEREIGN_CONDUIT_FRAME.overlaps,
+    center_identity: SOVEREIGN_CONDUIT_FRAME.center_identity,
+    evaluation_questions: SOVEREIGN_CONDUIT_FRAME.evaluation_questions,
+    scoring_rubric: SOVEREIGN_CONDUIT_FRAME.scoring_rubric
+  },
+  vocabulary: SOVEREIGN_CONDUIT_VOCABULARY,
+  voice: SOVEREIGN_CONDUIT_VOICE,
+  forbidden_phrases: SOVEREIGN_CONDUIT_FORBIDDEN,
+  preferred_patterns: SOVEREIGN_CONDUIT_PREFERRED,
+  strategic_patterns: SOVEREIGN_CONDUIT_STRATEGIC,
+  exemplar_refs: SOVEREIGN_CONDUIT_EXEMPLARS,
+  rewrite: sovereignConduitRewrite
+};
+
 // src/radiant/lenses/index.ts
 var LENSES = Object.freeze({
-  "auki-builder": aukiBuilderLens
+  "auki-builder": aukiBuilderLens,
+  "sovereign-conduit": sovereignConduitLens
 });
 function getLens(id) {
   return LENSES[id];
@@ -430,6 +711,7 @@ function listLenses() {
 
 export {
   aukiBuilderLens,
+  sovereignConduitLens,
   LENSES,
   getLens,
   listLenses