@networkpro/blog 1.3.5 → 1.3.6

package/CHANGELOG.md

@@ -16,6 +16,25 @@ formatting may vary.
 
 ---
 
+## [1.3.6] - 2025-07-01
+
+### Added
+
+- New blog post: `2025-07-01-eff-scotus.md` added to `/src/posts`.
+- Included associated promotional images: `eff-scotus-promo.png` and
+  `eff-scotus-promo.webp`.
+
+### Changed
+
+- Bumped version to `1.3.6`.
+- Upgraded dependencies:
+  - `@eslint/js` `^9.29.0` to `^9.30.0`
+  - `browserslist` `^4.25.0` to `^4.25.1`
+  - `eslint` `^9.29.0` to `^9.30.0`
+  - `prettier` `3.6.0` to `3.6.2`
+
+---
+
 ## [1.3.5] - 2025-06-24
 
 ### Changed
@@ -160,7 +179,8 @@ formatting may vary.
 
 <!-- Link references -->
 
-[Unreleased]: https://github.com/netwk-pro/blog/compare/v1.3.5...HEAD
+[Unreleased]: https://github.com/netwk-pro/blog/compare/v1.3.6...HEAD
+[1.3.6]: https://github.com/netwk-pro/blog/releases/tag/v1.3.6
 [1.3.5]: https://github.com/netwk-pro/blog/releases/tag/v1.3.5
 [1.3.4]: https://github.com/netwk-pro/blog/releases/tag/v1.3.4
 [1.3.3]: https://github.com/netwk-pro/blog/releases/tag/v1.3.3

package/cspell.json

@@ -20,12 +20,15 @@
     "msauth",
     "neteng",
     "NETPRO",
+    "netwk",
+    "networkpro",
     "npmjs",
     "NWPRO",
     "pozil",
     "robotstxt",
     "Squircle",
     "srcset",
+    "stylelintignore",
     "stylesheet",
     "Tuta",
     "urlset",

package/package.json

@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
 {
   "name": "@networkpro/blog",
-  "version": "1.3.5",
+  "version": "1.3.6",
   "description": "The official blog of Network Pro Strategies (Network Pro™).",
   "keywords": [
     "advisory",
@@ -49,17 +49,17 @@
     "upgrade": "npx npm-check-updates -u"
   },
   "devDependencies": {
-    "@eslint/js": "^9.29.0",
+    "@eslint/js": "^9.30.0",
     "@eslint/json": "^0.12.0",
     "autoprefixer": "^10.4.21",
-    "browserslist": "^4.25.0",
-    "eslint": "^9.29.0",
+    "browserslist": "^4.25.1",
+    "eslint": "^9.30.0",
     "eslint-config-prettier": "^10.1.5",
     "globals": "^16.2.0",
     "markdownlint": "^0.38.0",
     "markdownlint-cli2": "^0.18.1",
     "postcss": "^8.5.6",
-    "prettier": "3.6.0",
+    "prettier": "3.6.2",
     "stylelint": "^16.21.0",
     "stylelint-config-html": "^1.1.0",
     "stylelint-config-recommended": "^16.0.0",

package/src/posts/2025-07-01-eff-scotus.md

@@ -0,0 +1,87 @@
+---
+date:
+  created: 2025-07-01
+title: 'Supreme Court Upholds Age Verification Law'
+summary:
+  Supreme Court Upholds Age Verification Law — What It Means for Free Speech,
+  Privacy, and the Internet's Future
+authors:
+  - team
+categories:
+  - Privacy
+  - Security
+  - Policy
+tags:
+  - privacy
+  - cybersecurity
+  - mdl
+  - biometrics
+  - eff
+  - policy
+---
+
+# 🔐 Supreme Court Upholds Age Verification Law
+
+## What It Means for Free Speech, Privacy, and the Internet's Future
+
+On **June 27**, the U.S. Supreme Court upheld **Texas’s HB 1181**, mandating
+strict age verification (digital ID or biometric scans) for websites where over
+⅓ of content is deemed "harmful to minors."
+
+This ruling in _Free Speech Coalition v. Paxton_ could reshape the internet as
+we know it.
+
+<!-- more -->
+
+&nbsp;
+
+**🧠 Key Takeaways:**
+
+- **All users—including adults—must now verify their age** through personal IDs
+  or biometric data to access _lawful_ content.
+- The Court applied **intermediate scrutiny**, rejecting decades of precedent
+  that required **strict scrutiny** for restrictions on adult speech.
+- The **privacy and cybersecurity implications** are vast: data collection,
+  storage risks, and potential for misuse.
+- **20+ states** are poised to follow suit with similar legislation.
+
+&nbsp;
+
+**⚠️ Why It Matters:**
+
+This ruling sets a concerning precedent for how digital rights are balanced
+against regulatory goals. It could lead to:
+
+- **Massive privacy intrusions**
+- **Suppression of lawful speech**
+- **Broad government control over digital access**
+
+Organizations like the
+<a rel="noopener noreferrer" href="https://eff.org" target="_blank">EFF</a> and
+<a rel="noopener noreferrer" href="https://www.aclu.org/" target="_blank">ACLU</a>
+warn this could significantly erode First Amendment protections and chill
+innovation in privacy-preserving technologies.
+
+&nbsp;
+
+**💬 We'd like to hear from you:** Do age verification mandates strike the right
+balance between child safety and adult freedoms? Or are we moving toward a
+surveillance-by-default internet? Let us know at `social (at) neteng.pro`!
+
+&nbsp;
+
+Full analysis:  
+🔗 [eff.org/deeplinks/2025/06/todays-supreme-court-decision-age-verification-tramples-free-speech-and-undermines](https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2025/06/todays-supreme-court-decision-age-verification-tramples-free-speech-and-undermines)
+
+---
+
+<figure class="poster-figure">
+  <picture>
+  <source srcset="/img/eff-scotus-promo.webp" type="image/webp" />
+  <img src="/img/eff-scotus-promo.png" alt="Supreme Court Upholds Age Verification Law" style="width: 60%; height: 60%">
+  <figcaption>
+  Supreme Court Upholds Age Verification Law – featured visual
+  </figcaption>
+</figure>
+
+<!-- cspell:ignore deeplinks -->