@nebutra/contracts 0.1.0 → 0.1.2

package/.turbo/turbo-build.log

@@ -0,0 +1,37 @@
+
+> @nebutra/contracts@0.1.2 build /Users/tseka_luk/Documents/Nebutra-SaaS-Lab/Nebutra-Sailor/packages/commerce/contracts
+> tsup
+
+CLI Building entry: src/billing.ts, src/events.ts, src/identity.ts, src/index.ts, src/notifications.ts
+CLI Using tsconfig: tsconfig.json
+CLI tsup v8.5.1
+CLI Using tsup config: /Users/tseka_luk/Documents/Nebutra-SaaS-Lab/Nebutra-Sailor/packages/commerce/contracts/tsup.config.ts
+CLI Target: es2022
+CLI Cleaning output folder
+ESM Build start
+ESM dist/index.js              2.01 KB
+ESM dist/billing.js            332.00 B
+ESM dist/chunk-NFJTVIKD.js     1.32 KB
+ESM dist/chunk-2NXI4PJM.js     565.00 B
+ESM dist/chunk-5JNQ2KAT.js     2.07 KB
+ESM dist/notifications.js      1.11 KB
+ESM dist/events.js             173.00 B
+ESM dist/identity.js           563.00 B
+ESM dist/chunk-F4BR76CX.js     2.91 KB
+ESM dist/billing.js.map        71.00 B
+ESM dist/chunk-5JNQ2KAT.js.map 4.47 KB
+ESM dist/index.js.map          71.00 B
+ESM dist/chunk-NFJTVIKD.js.map 2.78 KB
+ESM dist/events.js.map         71.00 B
+ESM dist/identity.js.map       71.00 B
+ESM dist/notifications.js.map  71.00 B
+ESM dist/chunk-2NXI4PJM.js.map 1.16 KB
+ESM dist/chunk-F4BR76CX.js.map 6.05 KB
+ESM ⚡️ Build success in 95ms
+DTS Build start
+DTS ⚡️ Build success in 4639ms
+DTS dist/index.d.ts         1.69 KB
+DTS dist/billing.d.ts       2.11 KB
+DTS dist/events.d.ts        1020.00 B
+DTS dist/identity.d.ts      4.03 KB
+DTS dist/notifications.d.ts 6.09 KB

package/.turbo/turbo-typecheck.log

@@ -0,0 +1,4 @@
+
+> @nebutra/contracts@0.1.2 typecheck /Users/tseka_luk/Documents/Nebutra-SaaS-Lab/Nebutra-Sailor/packages/commerce/contracts
+> tsc --noEmit
+

package/CHANGELOG.md

@@ -0,0 +1,27 @@
+# @nebutra/contracts
+
+## 0.1.2
+
+### Patch Changes
+
+- Ship the MIT LICENSE file these packages have always declared but never included.
+
+  Every one of these declares `"license": "MIT"` in its manifest, and npm shows
+  that on the registry page — but the tarball carried no licence text at all.
+  MIT's own terms require the notice to accompany "all copies or substantial
+  portions of the Software", so a consumer vendoring one of these packages had
+  nothing to comply with.
+
+  No code changes. This is the licence text only, published so the tarballs
+  match what the manifests have been claiming.
+
+  `tests/architecture/release-surface.test.ts` now asserts the LICENSE _file_
+  exists and is MIT, not just the manifest _field_ — the field-only check is how
+  this went unnoticed, and is also how `create-sailor` shipped the full AGPL-3.0
+  text under an MIT declaration for its entire published history.
+
+## 0.1.1
+
+### Patch Changes
+
+- Publish registry package metadata under the MIT license.