@neat.is/mcp 0.9.2 → 0.9.3

package/dist/index.js

@@ -968,6 +968,11 @@ function formatDivergenceLine(d) {
       return `  \u2022 [${d.type}] ${d.source} \u2192 ${d.target} \u2014 declared host ${d.extractedHost}, observed host ${d.observedHost}`;
     case "compat-violation":
       return `  \u2022 [${d.type}] ${d.source} \u2192 ${d.target} \u2014 ${d.rule.kind}${d.rule.package ? ` (${d.rule.package})` : ""}`;
+    case "observed-symbol-mismatch": {
+      const at = d.location ? ` at ${d.location}` : "";
+      const member = d.symbol ? ` ${d.symbol}` : "";
+      return `  \u2022 [${d.type}] ${d.source}${member}${at} (${d.mismatchKind}) \u2014 confidence ${d.confidence.toFixed(2)}`;
+    }
   }
 }
 async function getDivergences(client2, input) {
@@ -1297,7 +1302,7 @@ registerTool(
   "Returns places where what the code declares (EXTRACTED) doesn't match what production observed (OBSERVED). The single most NEAT-shaped query \u2014 the one that justifies the whole graph. Use when the user asks 'is anything weird?' or 'what does production do that the code doesn't?' or 'find me a bug' on an unfamiliar codebase. Returns divergences ranked by confidence \xD7 severity. Prefer this over `get_root_cause` when no specific node is failing.",
   {
     type: z.array(DivergenceTypeSchema).optional().describe(
-      "Filter by divergence type. One or more of: missing-observed, missing-extracted, version-mismatch, host-mismatch, compat-violation. Omit for all."
+      "Filter by divergence type. One or more of: missing-observed, missing-extracted, version-mismatch, host-mismatch, compat-violation, observed-symbol-mismatch. Omit for all."
     ),
     minConfidence: z.number().min(0).max(1).optional().describe("Drop divergences below this confidence threshold (0.0 - 1.0)."),
     node: z.string().optional().describe("Scope to divergences involving this node id (as source or target)."),