@nano-step/skill-manager 5.6.0 → 5.6.2

package/skills/rri-t-testing/assets/rri-t-coverage-dashboard.md

@@ -0,0 +1,138 @@
+# RRI-T Coverage Dashboard — {feature_name}
+
+Feature: {feature_name}
+Date: {date}
+Release Gate Status: {release_gate_status}
+Release Version: {release_version}
+Owner: {owner}
+Prepared By: {prepared_by}
+
+## Release Gate Criteria
+
+| Rule | Criteria | Status |
+| --- | --- | --- |
+| RG-1 | All 7 dimensions >= 70% coverage | PASS / CONCERNS / FAIL / WAIVED |
+| RG-2 | At least 5/7 dimensions >= 85% coverage | PASS / CONCERNS / FAIL / WAIVED |
+| RG-3 | Zero P0 items in FAIL state | PASS / CONCERNS / FAIL / WAIVED |
+| RG-4 | P0 coverage = 100% | PASS / CONCERNS / FAIL / WAIVED |
+| RG-5 | P1 coverage >= 90% | PASS / CONCERNS / FAIL / WAIVED |
+
+### Gate Status Definitions
+
+| Status | Definition |
+| --- | --- |
+| PASS | Criteria fully met |
+| CONCERNS | Criteria partially met with documented mitigations |
+| FAIL | Criteria not met |
+| WAIVED | Criteria not met but approved with owner, expiry, remediation |
+
+## Dimension Coverage
+
+| Dimension | Total | PASS | FAIL | PAINFUL | MISSING | Coverage % | Risk Score | Gate |
+| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
+| D1: UI/UX | {d1_total} | {d1_pass} | {d1_fail} | {d1_painful} | {d1_missing} | {d1_coverage} | {d1_risk} | PASS / CONCERNS / FAIL / WAIVED |
+| D2: API | {d2_total} | {d2_pass} | {d2_fail} | {d2_painful} | {d2_missing} | {d2_coverage} | {d2_risk} | PASS / CONCERNS / FAIL / WAIVED |
+| D3: Performance | {d3_total} | {d3_pass} | {d3_fail} | {d3_painful} | {d3_missing} | {d3_coverage} | {d3_risk} | PASS / CONCERNS / FAIL / WAIVED |
+| D4: Security | {d4_total} | {d4_pass} | {d4_fail} | {d4_painful} | {d4_missing} | {d4_coverage} | {d4_risk} | PASS / CONCERNS / FAIL / WAIVED |
+| D5: Data Integrity | {d5_total} | {d5_pass} | {d5_fail} | {d5_painful} | {d5_missing} | {d5_coverage} | {d5_risk} | PASS / CONCERNS / FAIL / WAIVED |
+| D6: Infrastructure | {d6_total} | {d6_pass} | {d6_fail} | {d6_painful} | {d6_missing} | {d6_coverage} | {d6_risk} | PASS / CONCERNS / FAIL / WAIVED |
+| D7: Edge Cases | {d7_total} | {d7_pass} | {d7_fail} | {d7_painful} | {d7_missing} | {d7_coverage} | {d7_risk} | PASS / CONCERNS / FAIL / WAIVED |
+
+Legend: PASS | FAIL | PAINFUL | MISSING
+
+## Priority Breakdown
+
+| Priority | Total | PASS | FAIL | PAINFUL | MISSING | Coverage % | Gate |
+| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
+| P0 | {p0_total} | {p0_pass} | {p0_fail} | {p0_painful} | {p0_missing} | {p0_coverage} | PASS / CONCERNS / FAIL / WAIVED |
+| P1 | {p1_total} | {p1_pass} | {p1_fail} | {p1_painful} | {p1_missing} | {p1_coverage} | PASS / CONCERNS / FAIL / WAIVED |
+| P2 | {p2_total} | {p2_pass} | {p2_fail} | {p2_painful} | {p2_missing} | {p2_coverage} | PASS / CONCERNS / FAIL / WAIVED |
+| P3 | {p3_total} | {p3_pass} | {p3_fail} | {p3_painful} | {p3_missing} | {p3_coverage} | PASS / CONCERNS / FAIL / WAIVED |
+
+## Summary Metrics
+
+- Total Test Cases: {total_tc}
+- Overall Coverage %: {overall_coverage}
+- Dimensions Passing Gate: {dimensions_passing_gate}
+- P0 FAIL Count: {p0_fail_count}
+- P0 PAINFUL Count: {p0_painful_count}
+- MISSING Count: {missing_count}
+- Quality Score: {quality_score} (Grade: {grade})
+- Latest Update: {latest_update}
+- Notes: {summary_notes}
+- Risks: {summary_risks}
+
+## Trend Tracking
+
+| Metric | This Release | Last Release | Delta |
+| --- | --- | --- | --- |
+| Overall Coverage | {this_coverage}% | {last_coverage}% | {delta}% |
+| P0 Pass Rate | {this_p0}% | {last_p0}% | {delta}% |
+| P1 Pass Rate | {this_p1}% | {last_p1}% | {delta}% |
+| Quality Score | {this_quality} | {last_quality} | {delta} |
+| FAIL Count | {this_fail} | {last_fail} | {delta} |
+| PAINFUL Count | {this_painful} | {last_painful} | {delta} |
+
+## Waiver Log
+
+| Waiver ID | Item | Reason | Owner | Approved By | Expiry | Remediation Plan |
+| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
+| W-001 | | | | | | |
+| W-002 | | | | | | |
+| W-003 | | | | | | |
+
+## FAIL Items
+
+| TC ID | Priority | Dimension | Description | Assigned To |
+| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
+| {fail_tc_id_1} | {fail_priority_1} | {fail_dimension_1} | {fail_description_1} | {fail_assigned_to_1} |
+| {fail_tc_id_2} | {fail_priority_2} | {fail_dimension_2} | {fail_description_2} | {fail_assigned_to_2} |
+| {fail_tc_id_3} | {fail_priority_3} | {fail_dimension_3} | {fail_description_3} | {fail_assigned_to_3} |
+| {fail_tc_id_4} | {fail_priority_4} | {fail_dimension_4} | {fail_description_4} | {fail_assigned_to_4} |
+| {fail_tc_id_5} | {fail_priority_5} | {fail_dimension_5} | {fail_description_5} | {fail_assigned_to_5} |
+
+## PAINFUL Items
+
+| TC ID | Priority | Dimension | Description | UX Impact |
+| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
+| {painful_tc_id_1} | {painful_priority_1} | {painful_dimension_1} | {painful_description_1} | {painful_ux_impact_1} |
+| {painful_tc_id_2} | {painful_priority_2} | {painful_dimension_2} | {painful_description_2} | {painful_ux_impact_2} |
+| {painful_tc_id_3} | {painful_priority_3} | {painful_dimension_3} | {painful_description_3} | {painful_ux_impact_3} |
+| {painful_tc_id_4} | {painful_priority_4} | {painful_dimension_4} | {painful_description_4} | {painful_ux_impact_4} |
+| {painful_tc_id_5} | {painful_priority_5} | {painful_dimension_5} | {painful_description_5} | {painful_ux_impact_5} |
+
+## MISSING Items
+
+| TC ID | Priority | Dimension | Description | User Need |
+| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
+| {missing_tc_id_1} | {missing_priority_1} | {missing_dimension_1} | {missing_description_1} | {missing_user_need_1} |
+| {missing_tc_id_2} | {missing_priority_2} | {missing_dimension_2} | {missing_description_2} | {missing_user_need_2} |
+| {missing_tc_id_3} | {missing_priority_3} | {missing_dimension_3} | {missing_description_3} | {missing_user_need_3} |
+| {missing_tc_id_4} | {missing_priority_4} | {missing_dimension_4} | {missing_description_4} | {missing_user_need_4} |
+| {missing_tc_id_5} | {missing_priority_5} | {missing_dimension_5} | {missing_description_5} | {missing_user_need_5} |
+
+## Regression Test List
+
+| Test ID | Title | Dimension | Priority | Status |
+| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
+| {regression_id_1} | {regression_title_1} | {regression_dimension_1} | {regression_priority_1} | {regression_status_1} |
+| {regression_id_2} | {regression_title_2} | {regression_dimension_2} | {regression_priority_2} | {regression_status_2} |
+| {regression_id_3} | {regression_title_3} | {regression_dimension_3} | {regression_priority_3} | {regression_status_3} |
+| {regression_id_4} | {regression_title_4} | {regression_dimension_4} | {regression_priority_4} | {regression_status_4} |
+| {regression_id_5} | {regression_title_5} | {regression_dimension_5} | {regression_priority_5} | {regression_status_5} |
+
+## Sign-off
+
+| Role | Name | Decision | Notes |
+| --- | --- | --- | --- |
+| QA Lead | {qa_lead_name} | APPROVE / REJECT / WAIVE | {qa_lead_notes} |
+| Dev Lead | {dev_lead_name} | APPROVE / REJECT / WAIVE | {dev_lead_notes} |
+| Product | {product_name} | APPROVE / REJECT / WAIVE | {product_notes} |
+
+## Final Gate Decision
+
+**Decision:** PASS / CONCERNS / FAIL / WAIVED
+
+**Rationale:** {rationale}
+
+**Next Steps:** {next_steps}

package/skills/rri-t-testing/assets/rri-t-memory-protocol.md

@@ -0,0 +1,271 @@
+# RRI-T Memory Protocol
+
+## Purpose
+
+This protocol defines how RRI-T testing sessions persist state to nano-brain for cross-session continuity. Every phase saves its outputs, enabling resume from any point and cross-feature learning.
+
+## Save Format
+
+### Tag Convention
+
+```
+rri-t/{feature-slug}/{phase}
+```
+
+Examples:
+- `rri-t/checkout-flow/assess`
+- `rri-t/user-registration/discover`
+- `rri-t/inventory-sync/execute`
+
+### Content Structure
+
+```markdown
+## RRI-T {Phase} Complete: {Feature}
+
+- **Phase:** {0-5}
+- **Date:** {ISO-8601}
+- **Status:** COMPLETE / PARTIAL / BLOCKED
+- **Tier:** Full / Standard / Minimal
+- **Risk Score:** {1-9}
+
+### Key Outputs
+{phase-specific data}
+
+### Decisions Made
+{rationale for key decisions}
+
+### Next Phase
+{what the next phase needs from this phase}
+
+### Risks Identified
+{new or updated risks}
+```
+
+---
+
+## Phase-Specific Outputs
+
+### Phase 0: ASSESS
+
+Save after completing testability gate and risk assessment.
+
+```markdown
+### Key Outputs
+- Testability: {count}/5 prerequisites, {count}/5 testability criteria
+- Risk Score: {P} x {I} = {score} ({level})
+- Category: {CODE}
+- Tier: {Full/Standard/Minimal}
+- Decision: {PROCEED/CONCERNS/BLOCK}
+
+### Decisions Made
+- Selected {tier} tier because {rationale}
+- Primary risk category is {CODE} because {rationale}
+
+### Next Phase
+- Personas to assign: {count}
+- Dimensions to cover: {count}
+- Blockers to address: {list or "none"}
+
+### Risks Identified
+- R-001: {description} (Score: {score})
+- R-002: {description} (Score: {score})
+```
+
+### Phase 1: PREPARE
+
+Save after defining scope and assignments.
+
+```markdown
+### Key Outputs
+- Personas: {list of assigned personas}
+- Dimensions: {list of selected dimensions}
+- Coverage targets: P0={pct}%, P1={pct}%, Overall={pct}%
+
+### Decisions Made
+- Excluded {persona/dimension} because {rationale}
+- Prioritized {dimension} because {rationale}
+
+### Next Phase
+- Interview {count} personas
+- Focus on {key areas}
+```
+
+### Phase 2: DISCOVER
+
+Save after completing persona interviews.
+
+```markdown
+### Key Outputs
+- Questions generated: {count}
+- Test ideas: {count}
+- Key concerns: {list}
+
+### Decisions Made
+- Prioritized {concern} because {rationale}
+- Deprioritized {area} because {rationale}
+
+### Next Phase
+- Create {count} test cases
+- Focus stress axes: {list}
+
+### Risks Identified
+- R-003: {new risk from interviews}
+```
+
+### Phase 3: STRUCTURE
+
+Save after creating test cases and traceability.
+
+```markdown
+### Key Outputs
+- Test cases: {count} (P0: {n}, P1: {n}, P2: {n}, P3: {n})
+- Traceability: {count} requirements mapped
+- Coverage gaps: {count}
+- Stress axes selected: {list}
+
+### Decisions Made
+- Prioritized {test case} because {rationale}
+- Deferred {test case} because {rationale}
+
+### Next Phase
+- Execute {count} test cases
+- Focus on {priority areas}
+```
+
+### Phase 4: EXECUTE
+
+Save after executing tests and calculating quality score.
+
+```markdown
+### Key Outputs
+- Results: PASS={n}, FAIL={n}, PAINFUL={n}, MISSING={n}
+- Quality Score: {score} (Grade: {grade})
+- Bugs found: {count}
+- Evidence captured: {count} screenshots, {count} logs
+
+### Decisions Made
+- Marked {test} as PAINFUL because {rationale}
+- Skipped {test} because {rationale}
+
+### Next Phase
+- Analyze {count} results
+- Address {count} failures
+- Fill coverage dashboard
+
+### Risks Identified
+- R-004: {new risk from execution}
+```
+
+### Phase 5: ANALYZE
+
+Save after completing analysis and gate decision.
+
+```markdown
+### Key Outputs
+- Gate Decision: {PASS/CONCERNS/FAIL/WAIVED}
+- Coverage: P0={pct}%, P1={pct}%, Overall={pct}%
+- Dimensions passing: {count}/7
+- Waivers: {count}
+
+### Decisions Made
+- Gate decision is {decision} because {rationale}
+- Waived {item} because {rationale}
+
+### Lessons Learned
+- {lesson 1}
+- {lesson 2}
+
+### Reusable Patterns
+- {pattern for future features}
+```
+
+---
+
+## Resume Protocol
+
+When resuming an interrupted session:
+
+1. **Query memory:**
+   ```
+   memory_query("rri-t {feature-name}")
+   ```
+
+2. **Find latest completed phase:**
+   Look for most recent phase with Status: COMPLETE
+
+3. **Load outputs as context:**
+   Read Key Outputs and Next Phase sections
+
+4. **Continue from next phase:**
+   Start the phase indicated in Next Phase
+
+---
+
+## Cross-Feature Learning
+
+Save reusable patterns for future features:
+
+### Tag Convention
+
+```
+rri-t/patterns/{category}
+```
+
+Examples:
+- `rri-t/patterns/auth-testing`
+- `rri-t/patterns/offline-sync`
+- `rri-t/patterns/vietnamese-locale`
+
+### Content Structure
+
+```markdown
+## RRI-T Pattern: {Pattern Name}
+
+- **Category:** {category}
+- **Discovered:** {date}
+- **Source Feature:** {feature-name}
+
+### Pattern
+{description of reusable approach}
+
+### When to Apply
+{conditions when this pattern is useful}
+
+### Example
+{concrete example from source feature}
+```
+
+---
+
+## Example: Phase 0 ASSESS Memory Save
+
+```
+memory_write("## RRI-T ASSESS Complete: checkout-flow
+
+- **Phase:** 0
+- **Date:** 2025-03-08T10:30:00Z
+- **Status:** COMPLETE
+- **Tier:** Full
+- **Risk Score:** 6
+
+### Key Outputs
+- Testability: 5/5 prerequisites, 4/5 testability criteria
+- Risk Score: 2 x 3 = 6 (HIGH)
+- Category: DATA
+- Tier: Full
+- Decision: PROCEED
+
+### Decisions Made
+- Selected Full tier because risk score 6 requires comprehensive coverage
+- Primary risk category is DATA because checkout involves payment transactions
+
+### Next Phase
+- Personas to assign: 5 (all)
+- Dimensions to cover: 7 (all)
+- Blockers to address: none
+
+### Risks Identified
+- R-001: Payment state inconsistent on network failure (Score: 6)
+- R-002: Cart not cleared after successful checkout (Score: 4)
+")
+```

package/skills/rri-t-testing/assets/rri-t-persona-interview.md

@@ -0,0 +1,249 @@
+# RRI-T Persona Interview — {Feature Name}
+
+**Feature:** {feature-name}
+**Date:** {YYYY-MM-DD}
+**Interviewer:** {agent/person}
+
+## Interview Summary
+| Persona | Questions Generated | Key Concerns |
+|---------|-------------------|--------------|
+| End User | 0/25 | |
+| Business Analyst | 0/25 | |
+| QA Destroyer | 0/25 | |
+| DevOps Tester | 0/25 | |
+| Security Auditor | 0/25 | |
+| **Total** | **0/125** | |
+
+---
+
+## Persona 1: End User (Nguoi dung cuoi)
+
+### Context
+As a household member using {feature-name} daily to manage my family's shared resources, I need the feature to work reliably across different devices, network conditions, and usage patterns. I care about speed, clarity, and not losing my work.
+
+### Questions
+1. What happens when I add an inventory item while my phone has weak 3G signal? `[PERF]` `[D3: Performance]`
+2. What happens when I start editing a shopping list on mobile, then switch to desktop mid-task? `[DATA]` `[D5: Data Integrity]`
+3. What happens when I search for "nguyen" but the item name is "Nguyen Van A"? `[DATA]` `[D1: UI/UX]`
+4. What happens when I accidentally navigate away from a half-filled form? `[DATA]` `[D1: UI/UX]`
+5. What happens when I try to delete an item that another household member is currently editing? `[DATA]` `[D5: Data Integrity]`
+6. What happens when I upload a photo of a receipt and the file is 10MB? `[PERF]` `[D3: Performance]`
+7. What happens when I filter 500+ inventory items by expiration date on a mid-range phone? `[PERF]` `[D3: Performance]`
+8. What happens when I receive a phone call while recording a voice note for a meal plan? `[TECH]` `[D7: Edge Cases]`
+9. What happens when the app shows "1,000,000d" instead of "1.000.000d" for Vietnamese currency? `[BUS]` `[D1: UI/UX]`
+10. What happens when I'm offline for 2 days and then reconnect with 50 pending changes? `[DATA]` `[D6: Infrastructure]`
+11. 
+12. 
+13. 
+14. 
+15. 
+16. 
+17. 
+18. 
+19. 
+20. 
+21. 
+22. 
+23. 
+24. 
+25. 
+
+### Key Concerns
+- {list concerns discovered}
+
+---
+
+## Persona 2: Business Analyst (Phan tich nghiep vu)
+
+### Context
+As someone responsible for ensuring business rules are correctly implemented, I need to verify that household permissions, data ownership, financial calculations, and multi-household scenarios work as specified. I care about data consistency and rule enforcement.
+
+### Questions
+1. What happens when a household member with "viewer" role tries to delete an inventory item? `[SEC]` `[D4: Security]`
+2. What happens when a user belongs to 3 households and switches between them rapidly? `[DATA]` `[D5: Data Integrity]`
+3. What happens when two members simultaneously mark the same shopping list item as "purchased"? `[DATA]` `[D5: Data Integrity]`
+4. What happens when a household admin removes a member who has pending edits? `[BUS]` `[D4: Security]`
+5. What happens when the total expense calculation includes items in different currencies (VND and USD)? `[BUS]` `[D5: Data Integrity]`
+6. What happens when a recurring meal plan conflicts with a one-time event on the same date? `[BUS]` `[D7: Edge Cases]`
+7. What happens when a user tries to share an inventory item with a household they don't belong to? `[SEC]` `[D4: Security]`
+8. What happens when the system calculates "items expiring in 3 days" across different timezones? `[BUS]` `[D7: Edge Cases]`
+9. What happens when a household reaches the maximum allowed inventory items (if there's a limit)? `[BUS]` `[D7: Edge Cases]`
+10. What happens when a deleted household still has active shopping lists in other members' offline caches? `[DATA]` `[D6: Infrastructure]`
+11. 
+12. 
+13. 
+14. 
+15. 
+16. 
+17. 
+18. 
+19. 
+20. 
+21. 
+22. 
+23. 
+24. 
+25. 
+
+### Key Concerns
+- {list concerns discovered}
+
+---
+
+## Persona 3: QA Destroyer (Pha hoai vien QA)
+
+### Context
+As someone whose job is to break things, I need to find every edge case, race condition, and unexpected input that could crash the system or corrupt data. I care about boundary conditions, malformed inputs, and timing attacks.
+
+### Questions
+1. What happens when I paste 50,000 characters into the "item name" field? `[DATA]` `[D7: Edge Cases]`
+2. What happens when I rapidly click "save" 20 times in 1 second? `[PERF]` `[D7: Edge Cases]`
+3. What happens when I set my device date to 2099 and create an inventory item? `[DATA]` `[D7: Edge Cases]`
+4. What happens when I upload a file named `"; DROP TABLE inventory; --"` as an item photo? `[SEC]` `[D4: Security]`
+5. What happens when I create an item with expiration date "yesterday" and quantity "-5"? `[DATA]` `[D7: Edge Cases]`
+6. What happens when I open the app in 10 browser tabs and edit the same item in all of them? `[DATA]` `[D5: Data Integrity]`
+7. What happens when I force-kill the app during a GraphQL mutation? `[DATA]` `[D6: Infrastructure]`
+8. What happens when I inject `<script>alert('xss')</script>` into a meal plan description? `[SEC]` `[D4: Security]`
+9. What happens when I create a circular dependency (Item A requires Item B, Item B requires Item A)? `[BUS]` `[D7: Edge Cases]`
+10. What happens when I change my device timezone mid-session and create a timestamped event? `[DATA]` `[D7: Edge Cases]`
+11. 
+12. 
+13. 
+14. 
+15. 
+16. 
+17. 
+18. 
+19. 
+20. 
+21. 
+22. 
+23. 
+24. 
+25. 
+
+### Key Concerns
+- {list concerns discovered}
+
+---
+
+## Persona 4: DevOps Tester (Kiem thu ha tang)
+
+### Context
+As someone responsible for deployment, monitoring, and infrastructure reliability, I need to verify that the feature works under load, handles server restarts gracefully, and doesn't leak resources. I care about scalability, observability, and recovery.
+
+### Questions
+1. What happens when the GraphQL server restarts while a user is mid-sync? `[OPS]` `[D6: Infrastructure]`
+2. What happens when 100 users simultaneously bulk-import 500 inventory items each? `[PERF]` `[D3: Performance]`
+3. What happens when the database connection pool is exhausted during peak usage? `[OPS]` `[D6: Infrastructure]`
+4. What happens when the CDN serving item photos goes down? `[OPS]` `[D6: Infrastructure]`
+5. What happens when a GraphQL query takes longer than the 30-second timeout? `[PERF]` `[D3: Performance]`
+6. What happens when the Redis cache is cleared while users have active sessions? `[OPS]` `[D6: Infrastructure]`
+7. What happens when a deployment rolls out a new schema version while old clients are still connected? `[OPS]` `[D2: API]`
+8. What happens when disk space runs out during a photo upload? `[OPS]` `[D6: Infrastructure]`
+9. What happens when the monitoring system detects 500 errors but the app still appears functional? `[OPS]` `[D6: Infrastructure]`
+10. What happens when a user's offline queue grows to 1000+ pending mutations? `[PERF]` `[D3: Performance]`
+11. 
+12. 
+13. 
+14. 
+15. 
+16. 
+17. 
+18. 
+19. 
+20. 
+21. 
+22. 
+23. 
+24. 
+25. 
+
+### Key Concerns
+- {list concerns discovered}
+
+---
+
+## Persona 5: Security Auditor (Kiem toan bao mat)
+
+### Context
+As someone responsible for security compliance, I need to verify that authentication, authorization, data exposure, and audit trails are properly implemented. I care about access control, data leakage, and attack surface.
+
+### Questions
+1. What happens when a user's JWT token expires mid-session? `[SEC]` `[D4: Security]`
+2. What happens when a user tries to access another household's data by guessing the household ID? `[SEC]` `[D4: Security]`
+3. What happens when a removed household member still has cached data on their device? `[SEC]` `[D4: Security]`
+4. What happens when someone intercepts the GraphQL request and replays it with modified variables? `[SEC]` `[D4: Security]`
+5. What happens when a user tries to upload a malicious file disguised as an image? `[SEC]` `[D4: Security]`
+6. What happens when the audit log shows who deleted an item, but the user claims they didn't? `[SEC]` `[D4: Security]`
+7. What happens when a user shares their session token with someone outside the household? `[SEC]` `[D4: Security]`
+8. What happens when someone uses SQL injection in a search query (even though it's GraphQL)? `[SEC]` `[D4: Security]`
+9. What happens when a user's password is compromised and they don't realize it for 3 days? `[SEC]` `[D4: Security]`
+10. What happens when the system logs sensitive data (like financial amounts) in plain text? `[SEC]` `[D4: Security]`
+11. 
+12. 
+13. 
+14. 
+15. 
+16. 
+17. 
+18. 
+19. 
+20. 
+21. 
+22. 
+23. 
+24. 
+25. 
+
+### Key Concerns
+- {list concerns discovered}
+
+---
+
+## Consolidation Method
+
+After completing all persona interviews, consolidate findings into the risk register:
+
+1. **Group by Category:** Organize questions by risk category (TECH, SEC, PERF, DATA, BUS, OPS)
+2. **Identify Patterns:** Look for concerns raised by multiple personas
+3. **Score Risks:** For each unique risk, assign Probability (1-3) x Impact (1-3)
+4. **Prioritize:** Sort by risk score descending
+5. **Map to Dimensions:** Ensure each risk maps to at least one dimension (D1-D7)
+6. **Create Test Cases:** Convert high-priority risks into test cases using Q-A-R-P-T format
+
+### Consolidation Table
+
+| Risk ID | Description | Raised By | Category | Dimension | P | I | Score |
+|---------|-------------|-----------|----------|-----------|---|---|-------|
+| R-001 | | | | | | | |
+| R-002 | | | | | | | |
+| R-003 | | | | | | | |
+| R-004 | | | | | | | |
+| R-005 | | | | | | | |
+
+---
+
+## Raw Test Ideas (Consolidated)
+| # | Idea | Source Persona | Potential Dimension | Priority Estimate |
+|---|------|---------------|--------------------|--------------------|
+| 1 | | | | |
+| 2 | | | | |
+| 3 | | | | |
+| 4 | | | | |
+| 5 | | | | |
+| 6 | | | | |
+| 7 | | | | |
+| 8 | | | | |
+| 9 | | | | |
+| 10 | | | | |
+| 11 | | | | |
+| 12 | | | | |
+| 13 | | | | |
+| 14 | | | | |
+| 15 | | | | |
+| 16 | | | | |
+| 17 | | | | |
+| 18 | | | | |
+| 19 | | | | |
+| 20 | | | | |