@nano-step/skill-manager 5.1.0 → 5.2.0

package/skills/skill-creator/skill.json

@@ -0,0 +1,14 @@
+{
+    "name": "skill-creator",
+    "version": "1.0.0",
+    "description": "Create and validate AI agent skills with progressive disclosure, bundled scripts, and marketplace packaging",
+    "compatibility": "OpenCode",
+    "agent": null,
+    "commands": [],
+    "tags": [
+        "skill",
+        "creator",
+        "validation",
+        "packaging"
+    ]
+}

package/skills/team-workflow/SKILL.md

@@ -0,0 +1,227 @@
+---
+description: Simulate an autonomous software team analyzing a feature/idea — produces architecture, execution plan, QA strategy, and timeline
+---
+
+Simulate a full autonomous software team discussion and planning session. When invoked, analyze the input as a real engineering team preparing for production deployment.
+
+**Default language**: Vietnamese (output). Switch to English if user explicitly requests.
+
+**Input**: The argument after `/team` is either:
+- A feature idea or requirement from the Product Owner
+- A technical problem or improvement request
+- A free-form description of what needs to be built
+
+If the input is vague, ask ONE clarifying question before proceeding. Do NOT ask multiple rounds of questions.
+
+---
+
+## Team Structure
+
+You simulate ALL roles internally. Each role has a distinct perspective and responsibility:
+
+### Tech Lead (You — final technical authority)
+- Reviews architecture and technical decisions
+- Evaluates output quality from the team
+- Makes the final technical call
+- Ensures engineering standards
+
+### 3 Senior Software Engineers (You — simulated)
+- Design and implement systems
+- Propose **multiple** technical approaches (minimum 2)
+- Analyze trade-offs between options
+- Focus on code quality, performance, architecture
+
+### Senior QA Engineer (You — simulated)
+- Designs test strategy and regression plans
+- Provides **adversarial feedback** — challenges assumptions
+- Identifies edge cases, failure modes, and risks
+- Never rubber-stamps — always finds something to question
+
+### Product Owner (The User)
+- Provides the idea/requirement
+- Defines business direction
+- Sets product goals
+
+### Product Manager (You — dual role with Tech Lead)
+- Creates roadmap from the requirement
+- Manages scope and prioritization
+- Balances business needs vs engineering constraints
+- Estimates timelines realistically
+
+---
+
+## Workflow (executed sequentially)
+
+### PHASE 1 — Requirement Breakdown
+
+**PO Perspective (extract from user input):**
+- Business objective — what problem does this solve?
+- Success metrics — how do we measure it worked?
+- User impact — who benefits and how?
+
+**PM Perspective (you derive):**
+- Scope definition — what's in, what's out
+- Risk level — Low / Medium / High (with reasoning)
+- Complexity estimate — S / M / L / XL (with reasoning)
+
+### PHASE 2 — Technical Analysis (Internal Team Discussion)
+
+**MANDATORY requirements:**
+- **Minimum 2 technical approaches** (Option A, Option B, optionally C)
+- Each option must include: approach description, pros, cons
+- **Trade-off analysis** across these dimensions:
+  - Performance
+  - Scalability
+  - Security
+  - Maintainability
+  - Development speed
+- **QA adversarial review** — the QA Engineer MUST challenge at least 1 assumption or identify at least 2 risks
+- **Tech Lead synthesis** — summarize discussion, select recommended approach with clear reasoning
+
+**TEAM RULES for this phase:**
+- No instant agreement — there must be visible tension/trade-offs between options
+- No vague statements — every claim must have a concrete reason
+- Prioritize: Performance > Security > Maintainability > Speed
+
+### PHASE 3 — Execution Plan
+
+Produce ALL of the following:
+
+**1. Architecture Overview**
+- High-level system flow (use ASCII diagrams when helpful)
+- System components and their responsibilities
+- Integration points with existing systems
+- Data flow
+
+**2. Implementation Plan**
+- Break into Epics (large deliverables)
+- Break Epics into Tasks (actionable work items)
+- Assign each task to a role (Senior Eng 1/2/3, QA, Tech Lead)
+- Mark dependencies between tasks
+
+**3. QA Strategy**
+- Test plan (unit, integration, e2e)
+- Regression strategy
+- Edge case checklist
+- Performance testing approach (if applicable)
+
+**4. Timeline & Sprint Plan**
+- Sprint breakdown (1 sprint = 2 weeks default, adjust if user specifies)
+- Milestones with acceptance criteria
+- Risk buffer allocation (recommend 15-20% buffer)
+
+### PHASE 4 — Final Decision Summary
+
+- **Selected approach** and why (1-3 sentences)
+- **Remaining risks** that the team accepts
+- **Production-readiness conditions** — what must be true before shipping
+- **Open questions** for the PO (if any)
+
+---
+
+## Output Format (MANDATORY — follow exactly)
+
+```
+## Input
+<Requirement from PO — quoted or paraphrased>
+
+---
+
+## Team Analysis
+
+### 1. Product & Business View (PO + PM)
+**Business Objective:** ...
+**Success Metrics:** ...
+**User Impact:** ...
+**Scope:** In: ... | Out: ...
+**Risk Level:** [Low/Medium/High] — ...
+**Complexity:** [S/M/L/XL] — ...
+
+### 2. Engineering Discussion
+
+**Option A: [Name]**
+- Approach: ...
+- Pros: ...
+- Cons: ...
+
+**Option B: [Name]**
+- Approach: ...
+- Pros: ...
+- Cons: ...
+
+**Trade-off Matrix:**
+| Dimension | Option A | Option B |
+|-----------|----------|----------|
+| Performance | ... | ... |
+| Scalability | ... | ... |
+| Security | ... | ... |
+| Maintainability | ... | ... |
+| Dev Speed | ... | ... |
+
+### 3. QA Risk Assessment
+- **Challenged assumption:** ...
+- **Risk 1:** ...
+- **Risk 2:** ...
+- **Edge cases:** ...
+
+### 4. Tech Lead Decision
+**Selected:** [Option X]
+**Reasoning:** ...
+
+---
+
+## Execution Plan
+
+### Architecture
+[ASCII diagram or description]
+
+### Task Breakdown
+| Epic | Task | Owner | Dependency | Estimate |
+|------|------|-------|------------|----------|
+| ... | ... | ... | ... | ... |
+
+### QA Strategy
+- **Unit tests:** ...
+- **Integration tests:** ...
+- **E2E tests:** ...
+- **Regression:** ...
+- **Edge cases:** ...
+
+### Timeline
+| Sprint | Goals | Milestone |
+|--------|-------|-----------|
+| Sprint 1 | ... | ... |
+| Sprint 2 | ... | ... |
+| Buffer | 15-20% | Risk mitigation |
+
+---
+
+## Risk & Mitigation
+| Risk | Impact | Likelihood | Mitigation |
+|------|--------|------------|------------|
+| ... | ... | ... | ... |
+
+---
+
+## Final Recommendation
+**Approach:** ...
+**Production-ready when:** ...
+**Open questions for PO:** ...
+```
+
+---
+
+## Guardrails
+
+- **NEVER** give vague or generic answers — every statement must be grounded in the specific requirement
+- **NEVER** skip the trade-off analysis — minimum 2 options with clear pros/cons
+- **NEVER** let QA rubber-stamp — QA must always challenge something
+- **NEVER** skip any phase or output section
+- **ALWAYS** prioritize: Performance > Security > Maintainability > Speed
+- **ALWAYS** include risk buffer in timeline (15-20%)
+- **ALWAYS** assign tasks to specific roles
+- **ALWAYS** output in the mandatory format above
+- **ALWAYS** use Vietnamese as default output language (switch to English only if user requests)
+- If the requirement is too large, suggest splitting into multiple `/team` sessions by domain
+- If the requirement is too vague, ask ONE clarifying question — then proceed with reasonable assumptions
+- Treat every analysis as if the team is preparing for **real production deployment**

package/skills/team-workflow/skill.json

@@ -0,0 +1,15 @@
+{
+    "name": "team-workflow",
+    "version": "1.0.0",
+    "description": "Simulate an autonomous software team analyzing a feature \u2014 produces architecture, execution plan, QA strategy, and timeline",
+    "compatibility": "OpenCode",
+    "agent": null,
+    "commands": [],
+    "tags": [
+        "team",
+        "planning",
+        "architecture",
+        "qa",
+        "simulation"
+    ]
+}

package/skills/ui-ux-pro-max/SKILL.md

@@ -0,0 +1,292 @@
+---
+name: ui-ux-pro-max
+description: UI/UX design intelligence with searchable database
+---
+# ui-ux-pro-max
+
+Comprehensive design guide for web and mobile applications. Contains 67 styles, 96 color palettes, 57 font pairings, 99 UX guidelines, and 25 chart types across 13 technology stacks. Searchable database with priority-based recommendations.
+
+## Prerequisites
+
+Check if Python is installed:
+
+```bash
+python3 --version || python --version
+```
+
+If Python is not installed, install it based on user's OS:
+
+**macOS:**
+```bash
+brew install python3
+```
+
+**Ubuntu/Debian:**
+```bash
+sudo apt update && sudo apt install python3
+```
+
+**Windows:**
+```powershell
+winget install Python.Python.3.12
+```
+
+---
+
+## How to Use This Skill
+
+When user requests UI/UX work (design, build, create, implement, review, fix, improve), follow this workflow:
+
+### Step 1: Analyze User Requirements
+
+Extract key information from user request:
+- **Product type**: SaaS, e-commerce, portfolio, dashboard, landing page, etc.
+- **Style keywords**: minimal, playful, professional, elegant, dark mode, etc.
+- **Industry**: healthcare, fintech, gaming, education, etc.
+- **Stack**: React, Vue, Next.js, or default to `html-tailwind`
+
+### Step 2: Generate Design System (REQUIRED)
+
+**Always start with `--design-system`** to get comprehensive recommendations with reasoning:
+
+```bash
+python3 skills/ui-ux-pro-max/scripts/search.py "<product_type> <industry> <keywords>" --design-system [-p "Project Name"]
+```
+
+This command:
+1. Searches 5 domains in parallel (product, style, color, landing, typography)
+2. Applies reasoning rules from `ui-reasoning.csv` to select best matches
+3. Returns complete design system: pattern, style, colors, typography, effects
+4. Includes anti-patterns to avoid
+
+**Example:**
+```bash
+python3 skills/ui-ux-pro-max/scripts/search.py "beauty spa wellness service" --design-system -p "Serenity Spa"
+```
+
+### Step 2b: Persist Design System (Master + Overrides Pattern)
+
+To save the design system for hierarchical retrieval across sessions, add `--persist`:
+
+```bash
+python3 skills/ui-ux-pro-max/scripts/search.py "<query>" --design-system --persist -p "Project Name"
+```
+
+This creates:
+- `design-system/MASTER.md` — Global Source of Truth with all design rules
+- `design-system/pages/` — Folder for page-specific overrides
+
+**With page-specific override:**
+```bash
+python3 skills/ui-ux-pro-max/scripts/search.py "<query>" --design-system --persist -p "Project Name" --page "dashboard"
+```
+
+This also creates:
+- `design-system/pages/dashboard.md` — Page-specific deviations from Master
+
+**How hierarchical retrieval works:**
+1. When building a specific page (e.g., "Checkout"), first check `design-system/pages/checkout.md`
+2. If the page file exists, its rules **override** the Master file
+3. If not, use `design-system/MASTER.md` exclusively
+
+### Step 3: Supplement with Detailed Searches (as needed)
+
+After getting the design system, use domain searches to get additional details:
+
+```bash
+python3 skills/ui-ux-pro-max/scripts/search.py "<keyword>" --domain <domain> [-n <max_results>]
+```
+
+**When to use detailed searches:**
+
+| Need | Domain | Example |
+|------|--------|---------|
+| More style options | `style` | `--domain style "glassmorphism dark"` |
+| Chart recommendations | `chart` | `--domain chart "real-time dashboard"` |
+| UX best practices | `ux` | `--domain ux "animation accessibility"` |
+| Alternative fonts | `typography` | `--domain typography "elegant luxury"` |
+| Landing structure | `landing` | `--domain landing "hero social-proof"` |
+
+### Step 4: Stack Guidelines (Default: html-tailwind)
+
+Get implementation-specific best practices. If user doesn't specify a stack, **default to `html-tailwind`**.
+
+```bash
+python3 skills/ui-ux-pro-max/scripts/search.py "<keyword>" --stack html-tailwind
+```
+
+Available stacks: `html-tailwind`, `react`, `nextjs`, `vue`, `svelte`, `swiftui`, `react-native`, `flutter`, `shadcn`, `jetpack-compose`
+
+---
+
+## Search Reference
+
+### Available Domains
+
+| Domain | Use For | Example Keywords |
+|--------|---------|------------------|
+| `product` | Product type recommendations | SaaS, e-commerce, portfolio, healthcare, beauty, service |
+| `style` | UI styles, colors, effects | glassmorphism, minimalism, dark mode, brutalism |
+| `typography` | Font pairings, Google Fonts | elegant, playful, professional, modern |
+| `color` | Color palettes by product type | saas, ecommerce, healthcare, beauty, fintech, service |
+| `landing` | Page structure, CTA strategies | hero, hero-centric, testimonial, pricing, social-proof |
+| `chart` | Chart types, library recommendations | trend, comparison, timeline, funnel, pie |
+| `ux` | Best practices, anti-patterns | animation, accessibility, z-index, loading |
+| `react` | React/Next.js performance | waterfall, bundle, suspense, memo, rerender, cache |
+| `web` | Web interface guidelines | aria, focus, keyboard, semantic, virtualize |
+| `prompt` | AI prompts, CSS keywords | (style name) |
+
+### Available Stacks
+
+| Stack | Focus |
+|-------|-------|
+| `html-tailwind` | Tailwind utilities, responsive, a11y (DEFAULT) |
+| `react` | State, hooks, performance, patterns |
+| `nextjs` | SSR, routing, images, API routes |
+| `vue` | Composition API, Pinia, Vue Router |
+| `svelte` | Runes, stores, SvelteKit |
+| `swiftui` | Views, State, Navigation, Animation |
+| `react-native` | Components, Navigation, Lists |
+| `flutter` | Widgets, State, Layout, Theming |
+| `shadcn` | shadcn/ui components, theming, forms, patterns |
+| `jetpack-compose` | Composables, Modifiers, State Hoisting, Recomposition |
+
+---
+
+## Example Workflow
+
+**User request:** "Làm landing page cho dịch vụ chăm sóc da chuyên nghiệp"
+
+### Step 1: Analyze Requirements
+- Product type: Beauty/Spa service
+- Style keywords: elegant, professional, soft
+- Industry: Beauty/Wellness
+- Stack: html-tailwind (default)
+
+### Step 2: Generate Design System (REQUIRED)
+
+```bash
+python3 skills/ui-ux-pro-max/scripts/search.py "beauty spa wellness service elegant" --design-system -p "Serenity Spa"
+```
+
+**Output:** Complete design system with pattern, style, colors, typography, effects, and anti-patterns.
+
+### Step 3: Supplement with Detailed Searches (as needed)
+
+```bash
+# Get UX guidelines for animation and accessibility
+python3 skills/ui-ux-pro-max/scripts/search.py "animation accessibility" --domain ux
+
+# Get alternative typography options if needed
+python3 skills/ui-ux-pro-max/scripts/search.py "elegant luxury serif" --domain typography
+```
+
+### Step 4: Stack Guidelines
+
+```bash
+python3 skills/ui-ux-pro-max/scripts/search.py "layout responsive form" --stack html-tailwind
+```
+
+**Then:** Synthesize design system + detailed searches and implement the design.
+
+---
+
+## Output Formats
+
+The `--design-system` flag supports two output formats:
+
+```bash
+# ASCII box (default) - best for terminal display
+python3 skills/ui-ux-pro-max/scripts/search.py "fintech crypto" --design-system
+
+# Markdown - best for documentation
+python3 skills/ui-ux-pro-max/scripts/search.py "fintech crypto" --design-system -f markdown
+```
+
+---
+
+## Tips for Better Results
+
+1. **Be specific with keywords** - "healthcare SaaS dashboard" > "app"
+2. **Search multiple times** - Different keywords reveal different insights
+3. **Combine domains** - Style + Typography + Color = Complete design system
+4. **Always check UX** - Search "animation", "z-index", "accessibility" for common issues
+5. **Use stack flag** - Get implementation-specific best practices
+6. **Iterate** - If first search doesn't match, try different keywords
+
+---
+
+## Common Rules for Professional UI
+
+These are frequently overlooked issues that make UI look unprofessional:
+
+### Icons & Visual Elements
+
+| Rule | Do | Don't |
+|------|----|----- |
+| **No emoji icons** | Use SVG icons (Heroicons, Lucide, Simple Icons) | Use emojis like 🎨 🚀 ⚙️ as UI icons |
+| **Stable hover states** | Use color/opacity transitions on hover | Use scale transforms that shift layout |
+| **Correct brand logos** | Research official SVG from Simple Icons | Guess or use incorrect logo paths |
+| **Consistent icon sizing** | Use fixed viewBox (24x24) with w-6 h-6 | Mix different icon sizes randomly |
+
+### Interaction & Cursor
+
+| Rule | Do | Don't |
+|------|----|----- |
+| **Cursor pointer** | Add `cursor-pointer` to all clickable/hoverable cards | Leave default cursor on interactive elements |
+| **Hover feedback** | Provide visual feedback (color, shadow, border) | No indication element is interactive |
+| **Smooth transitions** | Use `transition-colors duration-200` | Instant state changes or too slow (>500ms) |
+
+### Light/Dark Mode Contrast
+
+| Rule | Do | Don't |
+|------|----|----- |
+| **Glass card light mode** | Use `bg-white/80` or higher opacity | Use `bg-white/10` (too transparent) |
+| **Text contrast light** | Use `#0F172A` (slate-900) for text | Use `#94A3B8` (slate-400) for body text |
+| **Muted text light** | Use `#475569` (slate-600) minimum | Use gray-400 or lighter |
+| **Border visibility** | Use `border-gray-200` in light mode | Use `border-white/10` (invisible) |
+
+### Layout & Spacing
+
+| Rule | Do | Don't |
+|------|----|----- |
+| **Floating navbar** | Add `top-4 left-4 right-4` spacing | Stick navbar to `top-0 left-0 right-0` |
+| **Content padding** | Account for fixed navbar height | Let content hide behind fixed elements |
+| **Consistent max-width** | Use same `max-w-6xl` or `max-w-7xl` | Mix different container widths |
+
+---
+
+## Pre-Delivery Checklist
+
+Before delivering UI code, verify these items:
+
+### Visual Quality
+- [ ] No emojis used as icons (use SVG instead)
+- [ ] All icons from consistent icon set (Heroicons/Lucide)
+- [ ] Brand logos are correct (verified from Simple Icons)
+- [ ] Hover states don't cause layout shift
+- [ ] Use theme colors directly (bg-primary) not var() wrapper
+
+### Interaction
+- [ ] All clickable elements have `cursor-pointer`
+- [ ] Hover states provide clear visual feedback
+- [ ] Transitions are smooth (150-300ms)
+- [ ] Focus states visible for keyboard navigation
+
+### Light/Dark Mode
+- [ ] Light mode text has sufficient contrast (4.5:1 minimum)
+- [ ] Glass/transparent elements visible in light mode
+- [ ] Borders visible in both modes
+- [ ] Test both modes before delivery
+
+### Layout
+- [ ] Floating elements have proper spacing from edges
+- [ ] No content hidden behind fixed navbars
+- [ ] Responsive at 375px, 768px, 1024px, 1440px
+- [ ] No horizontal scroll on mobile
+
+### Accessibility
+- [ ] All images have alt text
+- [ ] Form inputs have labels
+- [ ] Color is not the only indicator
+- [ ] `prefers-reduced-motion` respected

package/skills/ui-ux-pro-max/data/charts.csv

@@ -0,0 +1,26 @@
+No,Data Type,Keywords,Best Chart Type,Secondary Options,Color Guidance,Performance Impact,Accessibility Notes,Library Recommendation,Interactive Level
+1,Trend Over Time,"trend, time-series, line, growth, timeline, progress",Line Chart,"Area Chart, Smooth Area",Primary: #0080FF. Multiple series: use distinct colors. Fill: 20% opacity,⚡ Excellent (optimized),✓ Clear line patterns for colorblind users. Add pattern overlays.,"Chart.js, Recharts, ApexCharts",Hover + Zoom
+2,Compare Categories,"compare, categories, bar, comparison, ranking",Bar Chart (Horizontal or Vertical),"Column Chart, Grouped Bar",Each bar: distinct color. Category: grouped same color. Sorted: descending order,⚡ Excellent,✓ Easy to compare. Add value labels on bars for clarity.,"Chart.js, Recharts, D3.js",Hover + Sort
+3,Part-to-Whole,"part-to-whole, pie, donut, percentage, proportion, share",Pie Chart or Donut,"Stacked Bar, Treemap",Colors: 5-6 max. Contrasting palette. Large slices first. Use labels.,⚡ Good (limit 6 slices),⚠ Hard for accessibility. Better: Stacked bar with legend. Avoid pie if >5 items.,"Chart.js, Recharts, D3.js",Hover + Drill
+4,Correlation/Distribution,"correlation, distribution, scatter, relationship, pattern",Scatter Plot or Bubble Chart,"Heat Map, Matrix",Color axis: gradient (blue-red). Size: relative. Opacity: 0.6-0.8 to show density,⚠ Moderate (many points),⚠ Provide data table alternative. Use pattern + color distinction.,"D3.js, Plotly, Recharts",Hover + Brush
+5,Heatmap/Intensity,"heatmap, heat-map, intensity, density, matrix",Heat Map or Choropleth,"Grid Heat Map, Bubble Heat",Gradient: Cool (blue) to Hot (red). Scale: clear legend. Divergent for ±data,⚡ Excellent (color CSS),⚠ Colorblind: Use pattern overlay. Provide numerical legend.,"D3.js, Plotly, ApexCharts",Hover + Zoom
+6,Geographic Data,"geographic, map, location, region, geo, spatial","Choropleth Map, Bubble Map",Geographic Heat Map,Regional: single color gradient or categorized colors. Legend: clear scale,⚠ Moderate (rendering),⚠ Include text labels for regions. Provide data table alternative.,"D3.js, Mapbox, Leaflet",Pan + Zoom + Drill
+7,Funnel/Flow,funnel/flow,"Funnel Chart, Sankey",Waterfall (for flows),Stages: gradient (starting color → ending color). Show conversion %,⚡ Good,✓ Clear stage labels + percentages. Good for accessibility if labeled.,"D3.js, Recharts, Custom SVG",Hover + Drill
+8,Performance vs Target,performance-vs-target,Gauge Chart or Bullet Chart,"Dial, Thermometer",Performance: Red→Yellow→Green gradient. Target: marker line. Threshold colors,⚡ Good,✓ Add numerical value + percentage label beside gauge.,"D3.js, ApexCharts, Custom SVG",Hover
+9,Time-Series Forecast,time-series-forecast,Line with Confidence Band,Ribbon Chart,Actual: solid line #0080FF. Forecast: dashed #FF9500. Band: light shading,⚡ Good,✓ Clearly distinguish actual vs forecast. Add legend.,"Chart.js, ApexCharts, Plotly",Hover + Toggle
+10,Anomaly Detection,anomaly-detection,Line Chart with Highlights,Scatter with Alert,Normal: blue #0080FF. Anomaly: red #FF0000 circle/square marker + alert,⚡ Good,✓ Circle/marker for anomalies. Add text alert annotation.,"D3.js, Plotly, ApexCharts",Hover + Alert
+11,Hierarchical/Nested Data,hierarchical/nested-data,Treemap,"Sunburst, Nested Donut, Icicle",Parent: distinct hues. Children: lighter shades. White borders 2-3px.,⚠ Moderate,⚠ Poor - provide table alternative. Label large areas.,"D3.js, Recharts, ApexCharts",Hover + Drilldown
+12,Flow/Process Data,flow/process-data,Sankey Diagram,"Alluvial, Chord Diagram",Gradient from source to target. Opacity 0.4-0.6 for flows.,⚠ Moderate,⚠ Poor - provide flow table alternative.,"D3.js (d3-sankey), Plotly",Hover + Drilldown
+13,Cumulative Changes,cumulative-changes,Waterfall Chart,"Stacked Bar, Cascade",Increases: #4CAF50. Decreases: #F44336. Start: #2196F3. End: #0D47A1.,⚡ Good,✓ Good - clear directional colors with labels.,"ApexCharts, Highcharts, Plotly",Hover
+14,Multi-Variable Comparison,multi-variable-comparison,Radar/Spider Chart,"Parallel Coordinates, Grouped Bar",Single: #0080FF 20% fill. Multiple: distinct colors per dataset.,⚡ Good,⚠ Moderate - limit 5-8 axes. Add data table.,"Chart.js, Recharts, ApexCharts",Hover + Toggle
+15,Stock/Trading OHLC,stock/trading-ohlc,Candlestick Chart,"OHLC Bar, Heikin-Ashi",Bullish: #26A69A. Bearish: #EF5350. Volume: 40% opacity below.,⚡ Good,⚠ Moderate - provide OHLC data table.,"Lightweight Charts (TradingView), ApexCharts",Real-time + Hover + Zoom
+16,Relationship/Connection Data,relationship/connection-data,Network Graph,"Hierarchical Tree, Adjacency Matrix",Node types: categorical colors. Edges: #90A4AE 60% opacity.,❌ Poor (500+ nodes struggles),❌ Very Poor - provide adjacency list alternative.,"D3.js (d3-force), Vis.js, Cytoscape.js",Drilldown + Hover + Drag
+17,Distribution/Statistical,distribution/statistical,Box Plot,"Violin Plot, Beeswarm",Box: #BBDEFB. Border: #1976D2. Median: #D32F2F. Outliers: #F44336.,⚡ Excellent,"✓ Good - include stats table (min, Q1, median, Q3, max).","Plotly, D3.js, Chart.js (plugin)",Hover
+18,Performance vs Target (Compact),performance-vs-target-(compact),Bullet Chart,"Gauge, Progress Bar","Ranges: #FFCDD2, #FFF9C4, #C8E6C9. Performance: #1976D2. Target: black 3px.",⚡ Excellent,✓ Excellent - compact with clear values.,"D3.js, Plotly, Custom SVG",Hover
+19,Proportional/Percentage,proportional/percentage,Waffle Chart,"Pictogram, Stacked Bar 100%",10x10 grid. 3-5 categories max. 2-3px spacing between squares.,⚡ Good,✓ Good - better than pie for accessibility.,"D3.js, React-Waffle, Custom CSS Grid",Hover
+20,Hierarchical Proportional,hierarchical-proportional,Sunburst Chart,"Treemap, Icicle, Circle Packing",Center to outer: darker to lighter. 15-20% lighter per level.,⚠ Moderate,⚠ Poor - provide hierarchy table alternative.,"D3.js (d3-hierarchy), Recharts, ApexCharts",Drilldown + Hover
+21,Root Cause Analysis,"root cause, decomposition, tree, hierarchy, drill-down, ai-split",Decomposition Tree,"Decision Tree, Flow Chart",Nodes: #2563EB (Primary) vs #EF4444 (Negative impact). Connectors: Neutral grey.,⚠ Moderate (calculation heavy),✓ clear hierarchy. Allow keyboard navigation for nodes.,"Power BI (native), React-Flow, Custom D3.js",Drill + Expand
+22,3D Spatial Data,"3d, spatial, immersive, terrain, molecular, volumetric",3D Scatter/Surface Plot,"Volumetric Rendering, Point Cloud",Depth cues: lighting/shading. Z-axis: color gradient (cool to warm).,❌ Heavy (WebGL required),❌ Poor - requires alternative 2D view or data table.,"Three.js, Deck.gl, Plotly 3D",Rotate + Zoom + VR
+23,Real-Time Streaming,"streaming, real-time, ticker, live, velocity, pulse",Streaming Area Chart,"Ticker Tape, Moving Gauge",Current: Bright Pulse (#00FF00). History: Fading opacity. Grid: Dark.,⚡ Optimized (canvas/webgl),⚠ Flashing elements - provide pause button. High contrast.,Smoothed D3.js, CanvasJS
+24,Sentiment/Emotion,"sentiment, emotion, nlp, opinion, feeling",Word Cloud with Sentiment,"Sentiment Arc, Radar Chart",Positive: #22C55E. Negative: #EF4444. Neutral: #94A3B8. Size = Frequency.,⚡ Good,⚠ Word clouds poor for screen readers. Use list view.,"D3-cloud, Highcharts, Nivo",Hover + Filter
+25,Process Mining,"process, mining, variants, path, bottleneck, log",Process Map / Graph,"Directed Acyclic Graph (DAG), Petri Net",Happy path: #10B981 (Thick). Deviations: #F59E0B (Thin). Bottlenecks: #EF4444.,⚠ Moderate to Heavy,⚠ Complex graphs hard to navigate. Provide path summary.,"React-Flow, Cytoscape.js, Recharts",Drag + Node-Click