@nahisaho/shikigami 1.44.0 → 1.48.0
This diff represents the content of publicly available package versions that have been released to one of the supported registries. The information contained in this diff is provided for informational purposes only and reflects changes between package versions as they appear in their respective public registries.
- package/AGENTS.md +247 -19
- package/CHANGELOG.md +70 -0
- package/package.json +1 -1
package/AGENTS.md
CHANGED
|
@@ -311,10 +311,11 @@ When user says "project created", "created project", or similar:
|
|
|
311
311
|
2. **(Phase 0)** **Save Original Prompt** → `save_prompt(type: "original")`
|
|
312
312
|
3. **(Phase 1)** **Prompt Optimization** → Structure into 6 elements → Display → **WAIT for user approval**
|
|
313
313
|
4. **(Phase 2)** **Purpose Discovery** → Discover true purpose through 1Q1A dialogue
|
|
314
|
-
5. **(Phase
|
|
315
|
-
6. **(Phase
|
|
316
|
-
7. **(Phase
|
|
317
|
-
8. **(Phase
|
|
314
|
+
5. **(Phase 2.5)** **Knowledge Inheritance** → Search past projects → Inherit if relevant (optional)
|
|
315
|
+
6. **(Phase 3)** **Deep Research** → Think→Search→Report→Action cycle
|
|
316
|
+
7. **(Phase 4)** **Framework Analysis** → Apply SWOT/3C/PEST etc.
|
|
317
|
+
8. **(Phase 5)** **Report Generation** → Select template → Write report → Quality check → **WAIT for approval**
|
|
318
|
+
9. **(Phase 6)** **Complete** → Update manifest.yaml, verify deliverables
|
|
318
319
|
|
|
319
320
|
### Case B: New research request (no project yet)
|
|
320
321
|
|
|
@@ -327,14 +328,16 @@ When receiving a new research request:
|
|
|
327
328
|
5. **(Phase 0)** **Verify Folder** → Confirm `projects/pjXXXXX_<Name>_YYYYMMDD/` exists
|
|
328
329
|
6. **(Phase 1)** **Prompt Optimization** → Structure into 6 elements → Display → **WAIT for user approval**
|
|
329
330
|
7. **(Phase 2)** **Purpose Discovery** → Discover true purpose through 1Q1A dialogue
|
|
330
|
-
8. **(Phase
|
|
331
|
-
9. **(Phase
|
|
332
|
-
10. **(Phase
|
|
333
|
-
11. **(Phase
|
|
331
|
+
8. **(Phase 2.5)** **Knowledge Inheritance** → Search past projects → Inherit if relevant (optional)
|
|
332
|
+
9. **(Phase 3)** **Deep Research** → Think→Search→Report→Action cycle
|
|
333
|
+
10. **(Phase 4)** **Framework Analysis** → Apply SWOT/3C/PEST etc.
|
|
334
|
+
11. **(Phase 5)** **Report Generation** → Select template → Write report → Quality check → **WAIT for approval**
|
|
335
|
+
12. **(Phase 6)** **Complete** → Update manifest.yaml, verify deliverables
|
|
334
336
|
|
|
335
337
|
**MANDATORY APPROVAL POINTS** (must wait for user before proceeding):
|
|
336
338
|
- Case B Step 1: Project name confirmation
|
|
337
339
|
- Phase 1 (both cases): Structured prompt approval
|
|
340
|
+
- Phase 5→6 (both cases): Quality check approval
|
|
338
341
|
|
|
339
342
|
---
|
|
340
343
|
|
|
@@ -454,6 +457,79 @@ OUTPUT: True purpose, research plan, search query list
|
|
|
454
457
|
- CONSTRAINT: Time, budget, scope limitations?
|
|
455
458
|
- SUCCESS: How do you define success?
|
|
456
459
|
|
|
460
|
+
### Phase 2.5: Knowledge Inheritance (Optional)
|
|
461
|
+
|
|
462
|
+
```
|
|
463
|
+
WHEN: Phase 2 completed, before starting Phase 3
|
|
464
|
+
DO:
|
|
465
|
+
1. Search past projects for related topics:
|
|
466
|
+
- Use semantic_search across all projects/*/research/ and projects/*/reports/
|
|
467
|
+
- Query: user's research topic + key concepts from Phase 2
|
|
468
|
+
2. If related projects found (similarity > 0.7):
|
|
469
|
+
- List related projects with summary
|
|
470
|
+
- Ask user: "関連する過去プロジェクトが見つかりました。継承しますか?"
|
|
471
|
+
3. If user approves inheritance:
|
|
472
|
+
- Create research/inherited/ directory
|
|
473
|
+
- Copy relevant files with source tracking
|
|
474
|
+
- Update manifest.yaml with inheritance info
|
|
475
|
+
4. Adjust Phase 3 research plan to focus on:
|
|
476
|
+
- Updates since last research (time-based delta)
|
|
477
|
+
- Gaps not covered in previous research
|
|
478
|
+
- New perspectives requested by user
|
|
479
|
+
OUTPUT: Inherited knowledge list, adjusted research plan
|
|
480
|
+
```
|
|
481
|
+
|
|
482
|
+
**Related Project Display Format**:
|
|
483
|
+
```markdown
|
|
484
|
+
## 関連する過去プロジェクト
|
|
485
|
+
|
|
486
|
+
| Project | Date | Topic | Similarity | Key Findings |
|
|
487
|
+
|---------|------|-------|------------|-------------|
|
|
488
|
+
| pj00001_AIMarket_20251015 | 2025-10-15 | AI市場調査 | 0.85 | 市場規橐500億円, 成長率15% |
|
|
489
|
+
| pj00003_TechTrend_20251201 | 2025-12-01 | 技術トレンド | 0.72 | LLM採用率拡大 |
|
|
490
|
+
|
|
491
|
+
継承しますか? (はい/いいえ/選択して継承)
|
|
492
|
+
```
|
|
493
|
+
|
|
494
|
+
**Inheritance Directory Structure**:
|
|
495
|
+
```
|
|
496
|
+
projects/pjXXXXX_NewProject_YYYYMMDD/
|
|
497
|
+
├── research/
|
|
498
|
+
│ ├── inherited/ # 継承ナレッジ
|
|
499
|
+
│ │ ├── INHERITANCE_LOG.md # 継承元追跡
|
|
500
|
+
│ │ ├── pj00001_market-data.md # 継承ファイル
|
|
501
|
+
│ │ └── pj00003_tech-trends.md # 継承ファイル
|
|
502
|
+
│ └── search_*.md # 新規調査
|
|
503
|
+
```
|
|
504
|
+
|
|
505
|
+
**INHERITANCE_LOG.md Format**:
|
|
506
|
+
```markdown
|
|
507
|
+
# Knowledge Inheritance Log
|
|
508
|
+
|
|
509
|
+
## Inherited From
|
|
510
|
+
| Source Project | Files | Inherited Date | Reason |
|
|
511
|
+
|----------------|-------|----------------|--------|
|
|
512
|
+
| pj00001_AIMarket_20251015 | market-data.md | 2026-01-28 | 市場規模データの再利用 |
|
|
513
|
+
|
|
514
|
+
## Delta Research Focus
|
|
515
|
+
- [ ] 2025年10月以降の市場変化
|
|
516
|
+
- [ ] 新規参入企業の動向
|
|
517
|
+
- [ ] 規制環境の変化
|
|
518
|
+
```
|
|
519
|
+
|
|
520
|
+
**Delta Research Rules**:
|
|
521
|
+
```
|
|
522
|
+
WHEN: Knowledge inherited from past project
|
|
523
|
+
DO:
|
|
524
|
+
1. Check publication dates of inherited data
|
|
525
|
+
2. Focus new searches on:
|
|
526
|
+
- Time period: [inherited_data_date] to [today]
|
|
527
|
+
- Query modifier: "2025年以降" or "latest" or "recent"
|
|
528
|
+
3. Compare new findings with inherited data
|
|
529
|
+
4. Mark changes with (Δ) in report:
|
|
530
|
+
- 市場規模: 500億円 → 580億円 (Δ+16%)
|
|
531
|
+
```
|
|
532
|
+
|
|
457
533
|
### Phase 3: Deep Research
|
|
458
534
|
|
|
459
535
|
```
|
|
@@ -545,16 +621,85 @@ OUTPUT: Completed report (under reports/), reference list
|
|
|
545
621
|
```
|
|
546
622
|
|
|
547
623
|
**Template Selection Criteria**:
|
|
548
|
-
|
|
549
|
-
|
|
550
|
-
|
|
|
551
|
-
|
|
552
|
-
|
|
|
553
|
-
|
|
|
554
|
-
|
|
|
555
|
-
|
|
|
556
|
-
|
|
|
557
|
-
|
|
624
|
+
|
|
625
|
+
**Category 1: Approval & Decision**
|
|
626
|
+
| Purpose Keywords | Template | Use When |
|
|
627
|
+
|------------------|----------|----------|
|
|
628
|
+
| 予算承認、投資申請、コスト承認 | budget-approval | Budget/investment approval requests |
|
|
629
|
+
| 即時承認、緊急承認、迅速決定 | immediate-approval | Time-sensitive approvals |
|
|
630
|
+
| 段階承認、フェーズ承認、マイルストーン | staged-approval | Multi-phase approval processes |
|
|
631
|
+
| パイロット、試験導入、PoC承認 | pilot-approval | Pilot/trial approvals |
|
|
632
|
+
| 変更要求、変更管理、スコープ変更 | change-request | Change requests, scope changes |
|
|
633
|
+
|
|
634
|
+
**Category 2: Analysis & Research**
|
|
635
|
+
| Purpose Keywords | Template | Use When |
|
|
636
|
+
|------------------|----------|----------|
|
|
637
|
+
| 市場調査、市場分析、マーケット | market-analysis | Market research, industry analysis |
|
|
638
|
+
| 競合分析、競合調査、ライバル | competitive-analysis | Competitor landscape analysis |
|
|
639
|
+
| ユーザー調査、UXリサーチ、顧客理解 | user-research | User/customer research |
|
|
640
|
+
| リスク評価、リスク分析、脆弱性 | risk-assessment | Risk assessment, vulnerability analysis |
|
|
641
|
+
| デューデリジェンス、M&A、投資判断 | due-diligence | Due diligence, M&A evaluation |
|
|
642
|
+
| ABテスト、実験結果、比較実験 | ab-test | A/B test results, experiment reports |
|
|
643
|
+
|
|
644
|
+
**Category 3: Vendor & Procurement**
|
|
645
|
+
| Purpose Keywords | Template | Use When |
|
|
646
|
+
|------------------|----------|----------|
|
|
647
|
+
| ベンダー評価、製品選定、ツール選定 | vendor-evaluation | Vendor/product evaluation |
|
|
648
|
+
| RFI、情報提供依頼、事前調査 | rfi | Request for Information |
|
|
649
|
+
| RFP、提案依頼、入札 | rfp | Request for Proposal |
|
|
650
|
+
| SLA、サービスレベル、契約条件 | sla | SLA definition, service contracts |
|
|
651
|
+
|
|
652
|
+
**Category 4: Technical & Security**
|
|
653
|
+
| Purpose Keywords | Template | Use When |
|
|
654
|
+
|------------------|----------|----------|
|
|
655
|
+
| 技術調査、技術評価、アーキテクチャ | technical-report | Deep technical investigation |
|
|
656
|
+
| セキュリティ評価、脆弱性診断、監査 | security-assessment | Security audits, assessments |
|
|
657
|
+
| コンプライアンス、規制対応、法令遵守 | compliance | Compliance reports, regulatory |
|
|
658
|
+
|
|
659
|
+
**Category 5: Business & Strategy**
|
|
660
|
+
| Purpose Keywords | Template | Use When |
|
|
661
|
+
|------------------|----------|----------|
|
|
662
|
+
| ビジネスケース、投資対効果、ROI | business-case | Business case, ROI analysis |
|
|
663
|
+
| エグゼクティブサマリー、経営報告 | executive-summary | Brief overview for executives |
|
|
664
|
+
| ホワイトペーパー、技術解説、啓蒙 | white-paper | Thought leadership, technical papers |
|
|
665
|
+
| 検討資料、比較検討、オプション分析 | consideration | Options analysis, consideration docs |
|
|
666
|
+
|
|
667
|
+
**Category 6: Project & Operations**
|
|
668
|
+
| Purpose Keywords | Template | Use When |
|
|
669
|
+
|------------------|----------|----------|
|
|
670
|
+
| プロジェクト状況、進捗報告、ステータス | project-status | Project status reports |
|
|
671
|
+
| ポストモーテム、振り返り、障害報告 | post-mortem | Incident reviews, retrospectives |
|
|
672
|
+
| ロードマップ、製品計画、開発計画 | product-roadmap | Product/development roadmaps |
|
|
673
|
+
| QBR、四半期レビュー、業績報告 | qbr | Quarterly business reviews |
|
|
674
|
+
|
|
675
|
+
**Category 7: Sales & Customer**
|
|
676
|
+
| Purpose Keywords | Template | Use When |
|
|
677
|
+
|------------------|----------|----------|
|
|
678
|
+
| 営業資料、セールス、提案書 | sales-playbook | Sales enablement materials |
|
|
679
|
+
| 顧客成功事例、ケーススタディ、導入事例 | customer-success | Customer success stories |
|
|
680
|
+
|
|
681
|
+
**Category 8: Learning & Collaboration**
|
|
682
|
+
| Purpose Keywords | Template | Use When |
|
|
683
|
+
|------------------|----------|----------|
|
|
684
|
+
| 研修資料、トレーニング、教育 | training-material | Training/education materials |
|
|
685
|
+
| ワークショップ、ファシリテーション | workshop | Workshop design, facilitation |
|
|
686
|
+
| インタビューガイド、ヒアリング | interview-guide | Interview/hearing guides |
|
|
687
|
+
| 共同研究、産学連携、研究提案 | joint-research-proposal | Joint research proposals |
|
|
688
|
+
| 思考フロー、分析過程、ロジック展開 | thinking-flow-report | Thinking process documentation |
|
|
689
|
+
|
|
690
|
+
**Template Selection Flow**:
|
|
691
|
+
```
|
|
692
|
+
WHEN: Phase 5 starts
|
|
693
|
+
DO:
|
|
694
|
+
1. Extract purpose keywords from user's original request
|
|
695
|
+
2. Match keywords against Template Selection Criteria tables
|
|
696
|
+
3. If multiple matches, prioritize by:
|
|
697
|
+
a. Exact keyword match
|
|
698
|
+
b. Category relevance
|
|
699
|
+
c. User's stated output format
|
|
700
|
+
4. If no match found, use 'consideration' as default
|
|
701
|
+
5. Confirm template selection with user before writing
|
|
702
|
+
```
|
|
558
703
|
|
|
559
704
|
**CRITICAL**: Always use `shikigami-report-template` skill to load the appropriate template BEFORE writing. Template provides:
|
|
560
705
|
- Required sections and structure
|
|
@@ -611,6 +756,89 @@ OUTPUT: Completed report (under reports/), reference list
|
|
|
611
756
|
| 4→5 | 1+ framework applied, numerical verification done | Not required |
|
|
612
757
|
| 5→6 | Report exists, quality check passed, citations complete | **Required** |
|
|
613
758
|
|
|
759
|
+
### Quality Checklist (Phase 5→6 Gate)
|
|
760
|
+
|
|
761
|
+
```
|
|
762
|
+
WHEN: Report draft completed, before Phase 6
|
|
763
|
+
DO: Execute ALL checks below. Report CANNOT proceed to Phase 6 until all items pass.
|
|
764
|
+
```
|
|
765
|
+
|
|
766
|
+
**1. Numerical Consistency Check** ✅
|
|
767
|
+
| Check Item | How to Verify | FAIL Condition |
|
|
768
|
+
|------------|---------------|----------------|
|
|
769
|
+
| Source attribution | Every number has [[n]] citation | Any number without citation |
|
|
770
|
+
| Percentage totals | Sum of percentages = 100% (or explicitly explained) | Silent deviation from 100% |
|
|
771
|
+
| Text-table match | Numbers in body text match tables/charts | Any discrepancy |
|
|
772
|
+
| Unit correctness | 億/万/thousand/million used correctly | Unit mismatch or confusion |
|
|
773
|
+
| Time series order | Chronological data in correct sequence | Year/date ordering errors |
|
|
774
|
+
| Calculation accuracy | Derived numbers (growth rate, averages) are correct | Math errors |
|
|
775
|
+
|
|
776
|
+
**2. Citation Completeness Check** 📚
|
|
777
|
+
| Check Item | How to Verify | FAIL Condition |
|
|
778
|
+
|------------|---------------|----------------|
|
|
779
|
+
| Inline citations | All facts/claims have [[n]] format | Uncited factual statements |
|
|
780
|
+
| References list | All [[n]] appear in References section | Missing reference entries |
|
|
781
|
+
| URL validity | All URLs are accessible | 404 or dead links |
|
|
782
|
+
| No vague sources | No "various sources", "it is said that" | Vague attributions |
|
|
783
|
+
| Date recorded | All references include access date | Missing dates |
|
|
784
|
+
|
|
785
|
+
**3. Content Consistency Check** 🔄
|
|
786
|
+
| Check Item | How to Verify | FAIL Condition |
|
|
787
|
+
|------------|---------------|----------------|
|
|
788
|
+
| Executive summary sync | Summary numbers match body text | Any discrepancy |
|
|
789
|
+
| Conclusion alignment | Conclusions supported by analysis | Unsupported claims |
|
|
790
|
+
| Conflict markers handled | All (?), (⚡), (💭) items addressed | Unresolved conflicts |
|
|
791
|
+
| MECE coverage | No gaps or overlaps in analysis | Logical gaps |
|
|
792
|
+
|
|
793
|
+
**4. Format & Structure Check** 📋
|
|
794
|
+
| Check Item | How to Verify | FAIL Condition |
|
|
795
|
+
|------------|---------------|----------------|
|
|
796
|
+
| Template compliance | All required sections present | Missing sections |
|
|
797
|
+
| Heading hierarchy | Proper H1→H2→H3 structure | Broken hierarchy |
|
|
798
|
+
| Table formatting | Tables render correctly | Malformed tables |
|
|
799
|
+
| Link formatting | All links work correctly | Broken markdown links |
|
|
800
|
+
|
|
801
|
+
**Quality Check Execution Flow**:
|
|
802
|
+
```
|
|
803
|
+
Phase 5 Complete
|
|
804
|
+
↓
|
|
805
|
+
[1] Run Numerical Consistency Check
|
|
806
|
+
↓ (All pass?)
|
|
807
|
+
[2] Run Citation Completeness Check
|
|
808
|
+
↓ (All pass?)
|
|
809
|
+
[3] Run Content Consistency Check
|
|
810
|
+
↓ (All pass?)
|
|
811
|
+
[4] Run Format & Structure Check
|
|
812
|
+
↓ (All pass?)
|
|
813
|
+
Generate Quality Report Summary
|
|
814
|
+
↓
|
|
815
|
+
Request User Approval for Phase 6
|
|
816
|
+
```
|
|
817
|
+
|
|
818
|
+
**Quality Report Format**:
|
|
819
|
+
```markdown
|
|
820
|
+
## Quality Check Results
|
|
821
|
+
|
|
822
|
+
| Category | Status | Issues Found |
|
|
823
|
+
|----------|--------|-------------|
|
|
824
|
+
| Numerical Consistency | ✅ PASS / ❌ FAIL | [count] issues |
|
|
825
|
+
| Citation Completeness | ✅ PASS / ❌ FAIL | [count] issues |
|
|
826
|
+
| Content Consistency | ✅ PASS / ❌ FAIL | [count] issues |
|
|
827
|
+
| Format & Structure | ✅ PASS / ❌ FAIL | [count] issues |
|
|
828
|
+
|
|
829
|
+
### Issues to Address (if any)
|
|
830
|
+
1. [Issue description and location]
|
|
831
|
+
2. [Issue description and location]
|
|
832
|
+
```
|
|
833
|
+
|
|
834
|
+
**Auto-Fix Rules**:
|
|
835
|
+
| Issue Type | Auto-Fix Action |
|
|
836
|
+
|------------|----------------|
|
|
837
|
+
| Missing citation | Flag with ⚠️, request source |
|
|
838
|
+
| Percentage ≠ 100% | Add "(その他: X%)" or note |
|
|
839
|
+
| Unit confusion | Standardize to larger unit |
|
|
840
|
+
| Dead URL | Attempt Wayback Machine recovery |
|
|
841
|
+
|
|
614
842
|
---
|
|
615
843
|
|
|
616
844
|
## File Saving Rules
|
|
@@ -871,4 +1099,4 @@ DO: Auto-detect Shift_JIS/EUC-JP/ISO-2022-JP and convert to UTF-8
|
|
|
871
1099
|
---
|
|
872
1100
|
|
|
873
1101
|
**Last Updated**: 2026-01-28
|
|
874
|
-
**Version**: 1.
|
|
1102
|
+
**Version**: 1.48.0
|
package/CHANGELOG.md
CHANGED
|
@@ -5,6 +5,76 @@ All notable changes to SHIKIGAMI will be documented in this file.
|
|
|
5
5
|
The format is based on [Keep a Changelog](https://keepachangelog.com/en/1.0.0/),
|
|
6
6
|
and this project adheres to [Semantic Versioning](https://semver.org/spec/v2.0.0.html).
|
|
7
7
|
|
|
8
|
+
## [1.48.0] - 2026-01-28
|
|
9
|
+
|
|
10
|
+
### Added
|
|
11
|
+
|
|
12
|
+
- **AGENTS.md: Knowledge Inheritance (Phase 2.5)**
|
|
13
|
+
- New optional phase between Purpose Discovery and Deep Research
|
|
14
|
+
- Semantic search across past projects (research/ and reports/)
|
|
15
|
+
- Related project display with similarity scores
|
|
16
|
+
- User confirmation before inheritance
|
|
17
|
+
- `research/inherited/` directory structure
|
|
18
|
+
- `INHERITANCE_LOG.md` tracking format
|
|
19
|
+
- Delta Research Rules for time-based updates
|
|
20
|
+
- Change markers (Δ) for comparing inherited vs new data
|
|
21
|
+
- Workflow updated: Case A (8→9 steps), Case B (11→12 steps)
|
|
22
|
+
|
|
23
|
+
## [1.47.0] - 2026-01-28
|
|
24
|
+
|
|
25
|
+
### Changed
|
|
26
|
+
|
|
27
|
+
- **AGENTS.md: Integrate template selection & quality check into workflow overview**
|
|
28
|
+
- Case A Phase 5: "Create structured report" → "Select template → Write report → Quality check → **WAIT for approval**"
|
|
29
|
+
- Case B Phase 5: Same update
|
|
30
|
+
- Added Phase 5→6 to MANDATORY APPROVAL POINTS
|
|
31
|
+
- Quality check approval now required before Phase 6
|
|
32
|
+
|
|
33
|
+
## [1.46.0] - 2026-01-28
|
|
34
|
+
|
|
35
|
+
### Added
|
|
36
|
+
|
|
37
|
+
- **AGENTS.md: Detailed Quality Checklist (Phase 5→6 Gate)**
|
|
38
|
+
- **Numerical Consistency Check**: 6 items
|
|
39
|
+
- Source attribution, percentage totals, text-table match
|
|
40
|
+
- Unit correctness, time series order, calculation accuracy
|
|
41
|
+
- **Citation Completeness Check**: 5 items
|
|
42
|
+
- Inline citations, references list, URL validity
|
|
43
|
+
- No vague sources, date recorded
|
|
44
|
+
- **Content Consistency Check**: 4 items
|
|
45
|
+
- Executive summary sync, conclusion alignment
|
|
46
|
+
- Conflict markers handled, MECE coverage
|
|
47
|
+
- **Format & Structure Check**: 4 items
|
|
48
|
+
- Template compliance, heading hierarchy
|
|
49
|
+
- Table formatting, link formatting
|
|
50
|
+
- Quality Check Execution Flow diagram
|
|
51
|
+
- Quality Report Format template
|
|
52
|
+
- Auto-Fix Rules for common issues
|
|
53
|
+
|
|
54
|
+
## [1.45.0] - 2026-01-28
|
|
55
|
+
|
|
56
|
+
### Added
|
|
57
|
+
|
|
58
|
+
- **AGENTS.md: Complete Template Selection Criteria (33 templates)**
|
|
59
|
+
- Category 1: Approval & Decision (5 templates)
|
|
60
|
+
- budget-approval, immediate-approval, staged-approval, pilot-approval, change-request
|
|
61
|
+
- Category 2: Analysis & Research (6 templates)
|
|
62
|
+
- market-analysis, competitive-analysis, user-research, risk-assessment, due-diligence, ab-test
|
|
63
|
+
- Category 3: Vendor & Procurement (4 templates)
|
|
64
|
+
- vendor-evaluation, rfi, rfp, sla
|
|
65
|
+
- Category 4: Technical & Security (3 templates)
|
|
66
|
+
- technical-report, security-assessment, compliance
|
|
67
|
+
- Category 5: Business & Strategy (4 templates)
|
|
68
|
+
- business-case, executive-summary, white-paper, consideration
|
|
69
|
+
- Category 6: Project & Operations (4 templates)
|
|
70
|
+
- project-status, post-mortem, product-roadmap, qbr
|
|
71
|
+
- Category 7: Sales & Customer (2 templates)
|
|
72
|
+
- sales-playbook, customer-success
|
|
73
|
+
- Category 8: Learning & Collaboration (5 templates)
|
|
74
|
+
- training-material, workshop, interview-guide, joint-research-proposal, thinking-flow-report
|
|
75
|
+
- Japanese purpose keywords for each template
|
|
76
|
+
- Template Selection Flow with matching logic
|
|
77
|
+
|
|
8
78
|
## [1.44.0] - 2026-01-28
|
|
9
79
|
|
|
10
80
|
### Added
|
package/package.json
CHANGED