@mutmutco/codex-plugin 4.3.14 → 4.3.15

This diff represents the content of publicly available package versions that have been released to one of the supported registries. The information contained in this diff is provided for informational purposes only and reflects changes between package versions as they appear in their respective public registries.
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
1
1
  {
2
2
  "name": "mmi",
3
- "version": "4.3.14",
3
+ "version": "4.3.15",
4
4
  "mmiCompat": "4.x",
5
5
  "description": "MMI workflow skills and org gates delivery.",
6
6
  "author": {
package/package.json CHANGED
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
1
1
  {
2
2
  "name": "@mutmutco/codex-plugin",
3
- "version": "4.3.14",
3
+ "version": "4.3.15",
4
4
  "description": "MMI workflow skills and org gates delivery.",
5
5
  "author": {
6
6
  "name": "MMI Future",
@@ -550,6 +550,7 @@ Before your final report, answer one question honestly: did **this skill's own i
550
550
  this run — ambiguous wording, a misleading message, or an environment failure it should have warned
551
551
  about? (Process only — never the user's code or task; e.g. an ambiguous seed, registry, or OIDC step, or
552
552
  a guard that fired on a healthy repo.) If yes, file **one** lesson and move on; a clean run is silent
553
- (hard cap: one per run). It lands on the Hub board (deduped) and is fixed only via a reviewed PR — never
554
- edit the skill live; the retro is advisory, so if the call fails, note it and continue:
555
- `mmi-cli learning skill-lesson --skill bootstrap --title "<what misfired>" --body "<what; evidence; proposed amendment>"`
553
+ (hard cap: one per run). It lands on the owning board (deduped) and is fixed only via a reviewed PR — never
554
+ edit the skill live; the retro is advisory, so if the call fails, note it and continue. In-session, call the
555
+ `jerv_learning_note` tool with origin retro; the machine fallback is:
556
+ `jervcode learn --origin retro --surface skills --title "bootstrap: <what misfired>" --body "<what; evidence; proposed amendment>"`
@@ -123,6 +123,7 @@ Before your final report, answer one question honestly: did **this skill's own i
123
123
  this run — ambiguous wording, a misleading message, or an environment failure it should have warned
124
124
  about? (Process only — never the user's code or task; e.g. a batch schema that rejected a valid row, or a
125
125
  link that attached to the wrong parent.) If yes, file **one** lesson and move on; a clean run is silent
126
- (hard cap: one per run). It lands on the Hub board (deduped) and is fixed only via a reviewed PR — never
127
- edit the skill live; the retro is advisory, so if the call fails, note it and continue:
128
- `mmi-cli learning skill-lesson --skill epic --title "<what misfired>" --body "<what; evidence; proposed amendment>"`
126
+ (hard cap: one per run). It lands on the owning board (deduped) and is fixed only via a reviewed PR — never
127
+ edit the skill live; the retro is advisory, so if the call fails, note it and continue. In-session, call the
128
+ `jerv_learning_note` tool with origin retro; the machine fallback is:
129
+ `jervcode learn --origin retro --surface skills --title "epic: <what misfired>" --body "<what; evidence; proposed amendment>"`
@@ -95,8 +95,8 @@ Title first, verdict first. Name the resolved tag (never a placeholder like `vX.
95
95
 
96
96
  ## Retro
97
97
 
98
- Before the final report, answer one question honestly: did this skill's own instructions misfire this run — ambiguous wording, a misleading message, or an environment failure it should have warned about? Process only, never the user's code or task. If yes, file one lesson and move on; a clean run is silent (hard cap: one per run). It lands on the Hub board, deduplicated, and is fixed only through a reviewed PR — never edit the skill live. The retro is advisory: if the call fails, note it and continue. The amendment itself stays reference-free: the skill-drift gate rejects issue references in any section outside Merge floor, so carry the evidence in words or point at the guide entry — never inline reference markers.
98
+ Before the final report, answer one question honestly: did this skill's own instructions misfire this run — ambiguous wording, a misleading message, or an environment failure it should have warned about? Process only, never the user's code or task. If yes, file one lesson and move on; a clean run is silent (hard cap: one per run). It lands on the owning board, deduplicated, and is fixed only through a reviewed PR — never edit the skill live. The retro is advisory: if the call fails, note it and continue. In-session, call the `jerv_learning_note` tool with origin retro and let it queue the lesson; the command below is the machine fallback. The amendment itself stays reference-free: the skill-drift gate rejects issue references in any section outside Merge floor, so carry the evidence in words or point at the guide entry — never inline reference markers.
99
99
 
100
100
  ```bash
101
- mmi-cli learning skill-lesson --skill hotfix --title "<what misfired>" --body "<what; evidence; proposed amendment>"
101
+ jervcode learn --origin retro --surface skills --title "hotfix: <what misfired>" --body "<what; evidence; proposed amendment>"
102
102
  ```
@@ -73,8 +73,8 @@ Title first, verdict first. Name the resolved tag (never a placeholder like `vX.
73
73
 
74
74
  ## Retro
75
75
 
76
- Before the final report, answer one question honestly: did this skill's own instructions misfire this run — ambiguous wording, a misleading message, or an environment failure it should have warned about? Process only, never the user's code or task. If yes, file one lesson and move on; a clean run is silent (hard cap: one per run). It lands on the Hub board, deduplicated, and is fixed only through a reviewed PR — never edit the skill live. The retro is advisory: if the call fails, note it and continue. The amendment itself stays reference-free: the skill-drift gate rejects issue references in any section outside Merge floor, so carry the evidence in words or point at the guide entry — never inline reference markers.
76
+ Before the final report, answer one question honestly: did this skill's own instructions misfire this run — ambiguous wording, a misleading message, or an environment failure it should have warned about? Process only, never the user's code or task. If yes, file one lesson and move on; a clean run is silent (hard cap: one per run). It lands on the owning board, deduplicated, and is fixed only through a reviewed PR — never edit the skill live. The retro is advisory: if the call fails, note it and continue. In-session, call the `jerv_learning_note` tool with origin retro and let it queue the lesson; the command below is the machine fallback. The amendment itself stays reference-free: the skill-drift gate rejects issue references in any section outside Merge floor, so carry the evidence in words or point at the guide entry — never inline reference markers.
77
77
 
78
78
  ```bash
79
- mmi-cli learning skill-lesson --skill rcand --title "<what misfired>" --body "<what; evidence; proposed amendment>"
79
+ jervcode learn --origin retro --surface skills --title "rcand: <what misfired>" --body "<what; evidence; proposed amendment>"
80
80
  ```
@@ -82,8 +82,8 @@ Title first, verdict first. Name the resolved tag (never a placeholder like `vX.
82
82
 
83
83
  ## Retro
84
84
 
85
- Before the final report, answer one question honestly: did this skill's own instructions misfire this run — ambiguous wording, a misleading message, or an environment failure it should have warned about? Process only, never the user's code or task. If yes, file one lesson and move on; a clean run is silent (hard cap: one per run). It lands on the Hub board, deduplicated, and is fixed only through a reviewed PR — never edit the skill live. The retro is advisory: if the call fails, note it and continue. The amendment itself stays reference-free: the skill-drift gate rejects issue references in any section outside Merge floor, so carry the evidence in words or point at the guide entry — never inline reference markers.
85
+ Before the final report, answer one question honestly: did this skill's own instructions misfire this run — ambiguous wording, a misleading message, or an environment failure it should have warned about? Process only, never the user's code or task. If yes, file one lesson and move on; a clean run is silent (hard cap: one per run). It lands on the owning board, deduplicated, and is fixed only through a reviewed PR — never edit the skill live. The retro is advisory: if the call fails, note it and continue. In-session, call the `jerv_learning_note` tool with origin retro and let it queue the lesson; the command below is the machine fallback. The amendment itself stays reference-free: the skill-drift gate rejects issue references in any section outside Merge floor, so carry the evidence in words or point at the guide entry — never inline reference markers.
86
86
 
87
87
  ```bash
88
- mmi-cli learning skill-lesson --skill release --title "<what misfired>" --body "<what; evidence; proposed amendment>"
88
+ jervcode learn --origin retro --surface skills --title "release: <what misfired>" --body "<what; evidence; proposed amendment>"
89
89
  ```
@@ -163,6 +163,7 @@ Before your final report, answer one question honestly: did **this skill's own i
163
163
  this run — ambiguous wording, a misleading message, or an environment failure it should have warned
164
164
  about? (Process only — never the user's code or task; e.g. a canonical-name or tier mix-up, or a step
165
165
  that risked echoing a value.) If yes, file **one** lesson and move on; a clean run is silent (hard cap:
166
- one per run). It lands on the Hub board (deduped) and is fixed only via a reviewed PR — never edit the
167
- skill live; the retro is advisory, so if the call fails, note it and continue:
168
- `mmi-cli learning skill-lesson --skill secrets --title "<what misfired>" --body "<what; evidence; proposed amendment>"`
166
+ one per run). It lands on the owning board (deduped) and is fixed only via a reviewed PR — never edit the
167
+ skill live; the retro is advisory, so if the call fails, note it and continue. In-session, call the
168
+ `jerv_learning_note` tool with origin retro; the machine fallback is:
169
+ `jervcode learn --origin retro --surface skills --title "secrets: <what misfired>" --body "<what; evidence; proposed amendment>"`
@@ -173,6 +173,7 @@ Before your final report, answer one question honestly: did **this skill's own i
173
173
  this run — ambiguous wording, a misleading message, or an environment failure it should have warned
174
174
  about? (Process only — never the user's code or task; e.g. a teardown that left a port bound, or a
175
175
  Playwright output path aimed at the repo root.) If yes, file **one** lesson and move on; a clean run is
176
- silent (hard cap: one per run). It lands on the Hub board (deduped) and is fixed only via a reviewed PR —
177
- never edit the skill live; the retro is advisory, so if the call fails, note it and continue:
178
- `mmi-cli learning skill-lesson --skill stage --title "<what misfired>" --body "<what; evidence; proposed amendment>"`
176
+ silent (hard cap: one per run). It lands on the owning board (deduped) and is fixed only via a reviewed PR —
177
+ never edit the skill live; the retro is advisory, so if the call fails, note it and continue. In-session, call the
178
+ `jerv_learning_note` tool with origin retro; the machine fallback is:
179
+ `jervcode learn --origin retro --surface skills --title "stage: <what misfired>" --body "<what; evidence; proposed amendment>"`