@muhkoo/connect 0.14.0-alpha.6 → 0.14.0-alpha.7

This diff represents the content of publicly available package versions that have been released to one of the supported registries. The information contained in this diff is provided for informational purposes only and reflects changes between package versions as they appear in their respective public registries.
@@ -4245,17 +4245,20 @@ class FileStorage {
4245
4245
  // Shard reads coalesce into batches, so this is not a cap on requests —
4246
4246
  // it is how many hashes are available to batch together.
4247
4247
  //
4248
- // 8, not 16, and that is measured rather than reasoned. Raising it to 16
4249
- // (with the walk at 24) made a 519-file project load SLOWER: median 18.4s
4250
- // against 14.9s over three runs each. More hashes pending fills batches
4251
- // closer to the 256 cap, and a bigger batch is one large payload that has
4252
- // to arrive and decode completely before ANY of its files resolve — so
4253
- // the extra concurrency buys chunkier round trips with less overlap
4254
- // rather than more parallelism.
4248
+ // 8 because nothing measurable argues for more.
4255
4249
  //
4256
- // There is a floor as well as a ceiling: too low and each batch is small
4257
- // and serial, which is worse than not batching at all. 8 sits between the
4258
- // two, and moving it in either direction should be measured, not argued.
4250
+ // Raising it to 16 (walk at 24) looked 23% slower over three runs each,
4251
+ // and reverting looked like it restored the win — until a third set of
4252
+ // three landed on the same numbers as the RAISED setting. Pooled, the
4253
+ // configurations are indistinguishable: the run-to-run spread on a
4254
+ // 519-file project is 13.9-20.9s, far wider than any difference between
4255
+ // them. Three samples could not have resolved it and should not have
4256
+ // been trusted to.
4257
+ //
4258
+ // What IS established is the floor: too low and each batch is small and
4259
+ // serial, which is worse than not batching at all. Above that the setting
4260
+ // stops mattering at this scale, so it stays at the simpler value. Moving
4261
+ // it needs a sample large enough to see past that spread.
4259
4262
  this.concurrency = Math.max(1, opts.concurrency ?? 8);
4260
4263
  this.rsWasmModule = opts.rsWasmModule;
4261
4264
  if (this.chunkSize < 1)
@@ -5510,7 +5513,7 @@ function base64UrlDecode(s) {
5510
5513
  * expect (and isn't serving a stale cached bundle). Keep this in sync with
5511
5514
  * `package.json` `version`.
5512
5515
  */
5513
- const VERSION = "0.14.0-alpha.6";
5516
+ const VERSION = "0.14.0-alpha.7";
5514
5517
 
5515
5518
  /**
5516
5519
  * `HttpClient` — the one place the unified {@link Client} talks to the
@@ -12433,9 +12436,10 @@ const MAX_DEPTH = 64;
12433
12436
  */
12434
12437
  /** Directory records fetched in parallel while walking.
12435
12438
  *
12436
- * Back to 8 with the shard read concurrency: raising both together measured
12437
- * SLOWER on a 519-file project (median 18.4s against 14.9s), because fuller
12438
- * batches are chunkier round trips rather than more parallelism. */
12439
+ * Kept at 8 alongside the shard read concurrency. Raising both to 24/16 was
12440
+ * neither better nor worse once enough samples were taken — the spread between
12441
+ * runs is wider than the difference between the settings — so this stays at the
12442
+ * simpler value. See FileStorage's note. */
12439
12443
  const WALK_CONCURRENCY = 8;
12440
12444
  /**
12441
12445
  * `Promise.all` with a ceiling, preserving input order.