@mriekki/project-forge 4.13.3 → 4.13.5

This diff represents the content of publicly available package versions that have been released to one of the supported registries. The information contained in this diff is provided for informational purposes only and reflects changes between package versions as they appear in their respective public registries.
package/README.md CHANGED
@@ -8,13 +8,13 @@ The Builder brings the idea and makes the material decisions. Project Forge supp
8
8
 
9
9
  ## What it feels like
10
10
 
11
- Start with an idea:
11
+ Start with the one Project-creation prompt:
12
12
 
13
13
  ```text
14
- New Project: I want to build a hiking trail tracker.
14
+ New Project
15
15
  ```
16
16
 
17
- Project Forge guides the Builder through:
17
+ Project Forge presents the currently supported ways to begin, explains each option, and then guides the Builder through the path they select. A greenfield path looks like:
18
18
 
19
19
  ```text
20
20
  idea
@@ -72,7 +72,8 @@ open personal invitation
72
72
  → accept invitation
73
73
  → automatic readiness verification
74
74
  → configure one ChatGPT coding Project
75
- → New Project: <idea>
75
+ → New Project
76
+ → choose a supported start mode
76
77
  ```
77
78
 
78
79
  **Project Forge Builder** is the GitHub App used for Project Forge authorization and project orchestration.
@@ -1,7 +1,7 @@
1
1
  {
2
2
  "schemaVersion": 2,
3
3
  "package": "@mriekki/project-forge",
4
- "version": "4.13.3",
4
+ "version": "4.13.5",
5
5
  "defaultProfile": "greenfield-project",
6
6
  "profiles": {
7
7
  "greenfield-project": {
@@ -13,7 +13,7 @@
13
13
  },
14
14
  "components": {
15
15
  "core": {
16
- "revision": "13efbc5c8e368704a780c88bba6d42165664a74a",
16
+ "revision": "b51cb62bcc9630748168c9fd1900c6109cafb587",
17
17
  "version": "4.0.0",
18
18
  "distribution": "greenfield-workspace",
19
19
  "descriptor": "assets/core/distribution.json",
@@ -1,10 +1,10 @@
1
1
  {
2
2
  "schemaVersion": 2,
3
3
  "package": "@mriekki/project-forge",
4
- "version": "4.13.3",
4
+ "version": "4.13.5",
5
5
  "components": {
6
6
  "core": {
7
- "revision": "13efbc5c8e368704a780c88bba6d42165664a74a",
7
+ "revision": "b51cb62bcc9630748168c9fd1900c6109cafb587",
8
8
  "version": "4.0.0",
9
9
  "distribution": "greenfield-workspace",
10
10
  "files": [
@@ -76,7 +76,7 @@
76
76
  {
77
77
  "source": "core/skills/replatform/SKILL.md",
78
78
  "destination": ".github/skills/replatform/SKILL.md",
79
- "sha256": "f2d7e8d0b940fabeae15150d80a758c8b2980a54b0bc47040d07e9703a4cf044"
79
+ "sha256": "c43896b2b8ec92467769c32bf39de1e9d4f1090cef42005e22126cb2df88af59"
80
80
  },
81
81
  {
82
82
  "source": "core/skills/progress/SKILL.md",
@@ -79,6 +79,24 @@ Re-derive for the requested stack:
79
79
 
80
80
  Do not automatically preserve source Engineering Enabler IDs. Product Feature IDs may remain traceable when the semantic Feature is unchanged; record source IDs even when the new implementation re-slices or renumbers work.
81
81
 
82
+ ## Mandatory target reconciliation before proposal
83
+
84
+ Do not treat portable requirements as permission to silently choose implementation/deployment defaults. Before constructing the review manifest, explicitly reconcile the material target-specific choices needed by this Project.
85
+
86
+ At minimum:
87
+
88
+ 1. propose the V1 Engineering Enablers required by the selected stack and approved cross-cutting requirements;
89
+ 2. distinguish local development/runtime work from remote/Production readiness when both matter;
90
+ 3. reconcile deployment outcome/topology using the normal Bootstrap discovery model instead of defaulting it to deferred;
91
+ 4. account for approved operational success criteria such as backup/restore, public ingress, or Production availability with explicit enabler/deployment scope when they materially affect V1;
92
+ 5. preserve unresolved product decisions as unresolved rather than inventing implementation policy.
93
+
94
+ A replatform proposal must not collapse materially distinct technical readiness responsibilities into one generic Engineering Enabler merely because application scaffolding is deferred.
95
+
96
+ When current Bootstrap replatform tooling requires an explicit reconciliation input, construct it only from the catalog-driven choices and human-approved decisions from this conversation. It must include a non-empty `engineeringEnablers` array and an explicit `deployment` object. Do not synthesize either from stale defaults.
97
+
98
+ If material target-specific choices remain unresolved, keep discovery/reconciliation open and do not manufacture a review-state manifest yet.
99
+
82
100
  ## New-repository rule
83
101
 
84
102
  Replatforming requires a new target repository identity. The source repository is read-only evidence.
@@ -98,6 +116,8 @@ Use the current canonical Bootstrap replatform tooling when available. The expec
98
116
  ```text
99
117
  approved + canonically valid PROJECT_REQUIREMENTS.json
100
118
  + requested current catalog recipe/stack
119
+ + explicit reconciled Engineering Enablers
120
+ + explicit reconciled deployment topology/outcome
101
121
  + target repository identity
102
122
  → PROJECT_BOOTSTRAP.json state=review
103
123
  ```
@@ -120,6 +140,8 @@ roadmap maturity
120
140
 
121
141
  RE-DERIVED
122
142
  stack-specific architecture and Engineering Enablers
143
+ local-development/runtime shape
144
+ deployment outcome/topology and material operational responsibilities
123
145
 
124
146
  TARGET STACK
125
147
  resolved current catalog recipe and support state
package/package.json CHANGED
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
1
1
  {
2
2
  "name": "@mriekki/project-forge",
3
- "version": "4.13.3",
3
+ "version": "4.13.5",
4
4
  "description": "Public consumer distribution and updater for Project Forge engineering assets.",
5
5
  "type": "module",
6
6
  "bin": {