@mrciphersmith/keryx 0.3.113 → 0.3.115
This diff represents the content of publicly available package versions that have been released to one of the supported registries. The information contained in this diff is provided for informational purposes only and reflects changes between package versions as they appear in their respective public registries.
- package/README.md +4 -0
- package/dist/cli.js +414 -143
- package/dist/core.js +3 -1
- package/package.json +1 -1
- package/src/gdskills/bundled/skills/review/review-orchestrator/SKILL.md +8 -8
- package/src/gdskills/bundled/skills/review/review-orchestrator/reviewer-input.schema.json +13 -0
- package/src/gdskills/bundled/skills/review/review-orchestrator/templates/review-report.md +22 -0
package/README.md
CHANGED
|
@@ -1148,6 +1148,10 @@ package. See
|
|
|
1148
1148
|
|
|
1149
1149
|
Every managed review start, attach or ingest (and any `dispatch-check` or `blast-radius` given `--package`) refreshes the graph, the wiki and the memory index for the PR head and writes `layers.json`, with **no model call**; `wiki enrich` is the only model step and is never automatic (`keryx review layers refresh --package <dir> [--write-wiki]`). Blast-radius files beyond the 40-file cap are reviewed in chunks (`keryx review chunks estimate|next|record|merge`; the ceiling is 25 passes of 40 files, `reviewChunks.maxPasses` in `routing.config.json`), `keryx review coverage` counts what is covered, omitted by name, and uncovered, and `keryx review complete` refuses while a file is uncovered unless you pass `--waive-coverage "<your words>"`. `/reviews` and `/review layers` in the shell show it.
|
|
1150
1150
|
|
|
1151
|
+
### Gates that keep a review report honest
|
|
1152
|
+
|
|
1153
|
+
`keryx review complete` on a pull-request package refuses a merged PR or a moved head until the first line of `report.md` names the reviewed SHA and says so, and refuses a report with no `Evidence level:` line (`static only — did not run: <what>` or `ran — <what>`; a package ingested before the field existed only warns). `keryx review ingest` reads each finding's quote at its `path` at the reviewed SHA and refuses one that does not resolve there, adds a `citation not found` line to a rebuttal that cites a rule or document missing from the tree (the finding is never deleted), and a finding can close as `narrowed` only with a "what remains" text. See [review with a record](docs/docs/guides/review-with-a-record.md).
|
|
1154
|
+
|
|
1151
1155
|
### Review bot on pull requests
|
|
1152
1156
|
|
|
1153
1157
|
A GitHub Action reviews each same-repository pull request, has a second model
|