@modusensus/dsh-mneme 0.9.3 → 0.9.5

This diff represents the content of publicly available package versions that have been released to one of the supported registries. The information contained in this diff is provided for informational purposes only and reflects changes between package versions as they appear in their respective public registries.
Files changed (102) hide show
  1. package/README.md +56 -10
  2. package/bin/cli.mjs +215 -2
  3. package/docs/CONFIGURATION.md +10 -2
  4. package/docs/DAEMON.md +9 -2
  5. package/docs/DISTILL.md +66 -4
  6. package/docs/SHARE.md +552 -0
  7. package/docs/SLEEP.md +1 -1
  8. package/docs/STORAGE.md +1 -1
  9. package/lib/api-standalone.js +286 -8
  10. package/lib/api.js +254 -3
  11. package/lib/client.js +1000 -50
  12. package/lib/config.js +50 -1
  13. package/lib/document.js +15 -2
  14. package/lib/dream/decisions.js +88 -3
  15. package/lib/dream/sleep.js +63 -13
  16. package/lib/dream.js +66 -10
  17. package/lib/index.js +6 -1
  18. package/lib/inject.js +10 -25
  19. package/lib/lang.js +48 -6
  20. package/lib/memory-source.js +9 -0
  21. package/lib/organize.js +9 -3
  22. package/lib/pipeline.js +62 -1
  23. package/lib/profile-extract.js +161 -0
  24. package/lib/provenance-http.js +126 -0
  25. package/lib/serve.js +13 -0
  26. package/lib/service.js +70 -6
  27. package/lib/settings.js +17 -13
  28. package/lib/share-http.js +281 -0
  29. package/lib/share-import.js +234 -0
  30. package/lib/share.js +335 -0
  31. package/lib/store.js +272 -11
  32. package/lib/summarize.js +118 -8
  33. package/lib/tools.js +240 -1
  34. package/lib/user-settings.js +78 -0
  35. package/package.json +1 -1
  36. package/src/api-standalone.js +286 -8
  37. package/src/api.js +254 -3
  38. package/src/config.js +50 -1
  39. package/src/document.js +15 -2
  40. package/src/dream/decisions.js +88 -3
  41. package/src/dream/sleep.js +63 -13
  42. package/src/dream.js +66 -10
  43. package/src/index.js +6 -1
  44. package/src/inject.js +10 -25
  45. package/src/lang.js +48 -6
  46. package/src/memory-source.js +9 -0
  47. package/src/organize.js +9 -3
  48. package/src/pipeline.js +62 -1
  49. package/src/profile-extract.js +161 -0
  50. package/src/provenance-http.js +126 -0
  51. package/src/serve.js +13 -0
  52. package/src/service.js +70 -6
  53. package/src/settings.js +17 -13
  54. package/src/share-http.js +281 -0
  55. package/src/share-import.js +234 -0
  56. package/src/share.js +335 -0
  57. package/src/store.js +272 -11
  58. package/src/summarize.js +118 -8
  59. package/src/tools.js +240 -1
  60. package/src/user-settings.js +78 -0
  61. package/test/api.test.js +384 -3
  62. package/test/audit.test.js +2 -2
  63. package/test/cli-receive.test.js +390 -0
  64. package/test/cli-share.test.js +437 -0
  65. package/test/client-share.test.js +225 -0
  66. package/test/client.test.js +215 -6
  67. package/test/dedupe-candidate-window.test.js +180 -0
  68. package/test/dream-candidate-hybrid.test.js +2 -2
  69. package/test/dream-fence.test.js +164 -0
  70. package/test/dream.test.js +87 -5
  71. package/test/helpers/dream-mock.js +6 -2
  72. package/test/lang.test.js +11 -0
  73. package/test/llm-message-source.test.js +1 -1
  74. package/test/mint-source.test.js +1 -1
  75. package/test/organize-tool.test.js +232 -0
  76. package/test/persona-addressing.test.js +83 -0
  77. package/test/persona-settings.test.js +30 -8
  78. package/test/pipeline-r1r2.test.js +129 -0
  79. package/test/policy-epoch.test.js +2 -2
  80. package/test/profile-extract.test.js +269 -0
  81. package/test/provenance-http.test.js +184 -0
  82. package/test/readme-claims.test.js +45 -0
  83. package/test/reasoning-effort.test.js +10 -10
  84. package/test/scope-candidates.test.js +7 -4
  85. package/test/scope-state.test.js +130 -1
  86. package/test/serve.test.js +62 -0
  87. package/test/share-foreign-rows.test.js +144 -0
  88. package/test/share-http.test.js +144 -0
  89. package/test/share-import.test.js +577 -0
  90. package/test/share-imported-guard.test.js +311 -0
  91. package/test/share-imported-identity.test.js +111 -0
  92. package/test/share-pack.test.js +511 -0
  93. package/test/share-receive-http.test.js +756 -0
  94. package/test/share-routes.test.js +337 -0
  95. package/test/share-store.test.js +133 -0
  96. package/test/share-validate.test.js +101 -0
  97. package/test/standalone-api.test.js +524 -5
  98. package/test/summarize-parse-diagnostics.test.js +75 -0
  99. package/test/summarize.test.js +240 -2
  100. package/test/tools-dto-schema-matrix.test.js +48 -5
  101. package/test/tools.test.js +6 -1
  102. package/test/user-settings-preview.test.js +127 -0
@@ -1,18 +1,22 @@
1
1
  import test from "node:test";
2
2
  import assert from "node:assert/strict";
3
+ import { readFileSync } from "node:fs";
3
4
  import { createStore } from "../src/store.js";
4
5
  import { createService } from "../src/service.js";
5
6
  import { createSettings } from "../src/settings.js";
6
- import { createStandaloneApi } from "../src/api-standalone.js";
7
+ import { createStandaloneApi, CONTEXT_DEGRADE_REASONS } from "../src/api-standalone.js";
7
8
  import { PACKAGE_VERSION } from "../src/version-check.js";
8
9
  import { Config, applyLightModePreset } from "../src/config.js";
9
10
 
10
11
  // Real HTTP server on an OS-assigned port (port: 0), driven with fetch.
11
- async function setup({ config = {}, embedder = null, embedTimeoutMs } = {}) {
12
+ // `logger` 可传(默认 null):#383 的降级原因只进 daemon stderr 那行 warn、不进响应体,
13
+ // 不接住 logger 就观测不到它——而「日志值 ∈ 枚举」正是 #508 Minor 唯一的可观测效应,
14
+ // 也是它当初能溜进来的原因(没有任何测试看过那行日志)。
15
+ async function setup({ config = {}, embedder = null, embedTimeoutMs, logger = null } = {}) {
12
16
  const store = createStore(":memory:");
13
17
  const service = createService({ store, mirror: null, config });
14
18
  const settings = createSettings(store.db);
15
- const api = createStandaloneApi({ service, store, config, settings, logger: null, port: 0, embedder, embedTimeoutMs });
19
+ const api = createStandaloneApi({ service, store, config, settings, logger, port: 0, embedder, embedTimeoutMs });
16
20
  await api.ready;
17
21
  const base = `http://127.0.0.1:${api.port}`;
18
22
  const auth = { authorization: `Bearer ${api.token}` };
@@ -588,8 +592,13 @@ test("GET /context returns the injection-shaped aggregate; empty q still serves
588
592
  const res = await fetch(`${base}/context`, { headers: auth });
589
593
  assert.equal(res.status, 200);
590
594
  const body = await res.json();
591
- // 形状锁:四键响应——bridge 等调用方按这四个键渲染,漂移(加塞/漏带)在此变红。
592
- assert.deepEqual(Object.keys(body).sort(), ["items", "pinnedCount", "profile", "rules"]);
595
+ // 形状锁:五键响应——bridge 等调用方按这些键渲染,漂移(加塞/漏带)在此变红。
596
+ // #383 新增 tier(档位信号);空 q 时语义路未启用,报 unknown 而不是 full。
597
+ // 注意 unknown **不只**是空 q:#508 之后「维度探针没跑成」与「有行但一条向量都读
598
+ // 不出来」也落这里(判不出来就不宣称 full)——三态不变,unknown 的生产者多了两个。
599
+ assert.deepEqual(Object.keys(body).sort(), ["items", "pinnedCount", "profile", "rules", "tier"]);
600
+ assert.equal(typeof body.tier, "string", "tier 必填");
601
+ assert.equal(body.tier, "unknown", "空 q = 语义路未启用,不宣称档位(fail-closed,不报 full)");
593
602
  assert.equal(body.profile, "我是后端工程师");
594
603
  assert.deepEqual(body.rules, ["先验证再修改"]);
595
604
  assert.equal(body.pinnedCount, 0, "pinnedInjectBudget 默认 0(opt-in 纪律,issue #370 取舍 3)");
@@ -749,3 +758,513 @@ test("strictPort: busy port rejects instead of hopping; default path still hops"
749
758
  store.close();
750
759
  }
751
760
  });
761
+
762
+ // --- GET /context 的档位信号(issue #383)---------------------------------------
763
+ // 嵌入降级在调用方视角是完全静默的:items 看起来正常,只是召回质量悄悄变差。
764
+ // 外部集成方(Mneme Bridge 的 remote 模式)无法据此降级自己的期望或打日志。
765
+ // 三态 fail-closed:判不出来报 unknown,不报 full。
766
+
767
+ /** 可用的 embedder:任何查询都回一个固定向量。 */
768
+ const okEmbedder = { embedSingle: async () => [1, 0, 0], embed: async () => [1, 0, 0] };
769
+
770
+ test("GET /context tier=full when the query embedding succeeds", async () => {
771
+ const { base, auth, close } = await setup({ embedder: okEmbedder });
772
+ try {
773
+ await saveMemory(base, auth, { type: "decision", title: "核心决策", content: "选定 SQLite 单文件库", importance: 5 });
774
+ const body = await (await fetch(`${base}/context?q=${encodeURIComponent("数据库选型")}`, { headers: auth })).json();
775
+ assert.equal(body.tier, "full", "嵌入成功 → 语义档");
776
+ } finally {
777
+ close();
778
+ }
779
+ });
780
+
781
+ test("GET /context tier=degraded when no embedder is injected", async () => {
782
+ // 缺省(不传 embedder):daemon 与宿主都可能走到这条——embedder 未装配。
783
+ const { base, auth, close } = await setup();
784
+ try {
785
+ await saveMemory(base, auth, { type: "decision", title: "核心决策", content: "选定 SQLite 单文件库", importance: 5 });
786
+ const body = await (await fetch(`${base}/context?q=${encodeURIComponent("数据库选型")}`, { headers: auth })).json();
787
+ assert.equal(body.tier, "degraded", "无 embedder → 降级到规则档,且必须说出来");
788
+ } finally {
789
+ close();
790
+ }
791
+ });
792
+
793
+ test("GET /context tier=degraded when the query embedding times out", async () => {
794
+ // embedder 挂起(不抛错)时由 withEmbedTimeout 兜底——这是最难自查的一种降级,
795
+ // 因为接口是好的、只是没有响应。
796
+ const hanging = { embedSingle: () => new Promise(() => {}), embed: () => new Promise(() => {}) };
797
+ const { base, auth, close } = await setup({ embedder: hanging, embedTimeoutMs: 30 });
798
+ try {
799
+ await saveMemory(base, auth, { type: "decision", title: "核心决策", content: "选定 SQLite 单文件库", importance: 5 });
800
+ const body = await (await fetch(`${base}/context?q=${encodeURIComponent("数据库选型")}`, { headers: auth })).json();
801
+ assert.equal(body.tier, "degraded", "嵌入超时 → 降级到规则档");
802
+ } finally {
803
+ close();
804
+ }
805
+ });
806
+
807
+ test("GET /context tier=degraded when the embedder returns an unusable vector", async () => {
808
+ // 空数组 / 非数组同样让语义路走不通(embedQueryVector 的既有兜底),一并报降级。
809
+ const empty = { embedSingle: async () => [], embed: async () => [] };
810
+ const { base, auth, close } = await setup({ embedder: empty });
811
+ try {
812
+ await saveMemory(base, auth, { type: "decision", title: "核心决策", content: "选定 SQLite 单文件库", importance: 5 });
813
+ const body = await (await fetch(`${base}/context?q=${encodeURIComponent("数据库选型")}`, { headers: auth })).json();
814
+ assert.equal(body.tier, "degraded", "不可用向量 → 降级到规则档");
815
+ } finally {
816
+ close();
817
+ }
818
+ });
819
+
820
+ test("GET /context tier=degraded when the query vector's dimension differs from the stored one", async () => {
821
+ // #383 点名的那一种「悄悄退化」,也是 #508 评审里问「维度不符去哪了」的那一档:
822
+ // 嵌入接口一切正常(真的返回了向量),但库里躺着旧维度的向量——searchVector 对
823
+ // `v.length !== vector.length` 的行直接跳过,不抛错、只是命中为零,于是召回静默
824
+ // 退回 BM25/规则档。没有这个读数时,调用方看到的是 tier=full 加一份看着正常的
825
+ // items,而语义召回其实整条是死的。
826
+ const { base, auth, close, store, service } = await setup({ embedder: okEmbedder });
827
+ try {
828
+ await saveMemory(base, auth, { type: "decision", title: "核心决策", content: "选定 SQLite 单文件库", importance: 5 });
829
+ // 手工塞一个 4 维向量:模拟「换了嵌入模型,旧向量还没重建索引」。okEmbedder 出
830
+ // 来的是 3 维,所以这一行的维度与查询向量不可比。
831
+ const memory = service.all().find((m) => m.title === "核心决策");
832
+ store.setEmbedding(memory.id, [1, 0, 0, 0]);
833
+ assert.deepEqual(store.vectorDimensionState(3), { state: "mismatch" }, "夹具前置:库里有向量,但没有一条与 3 维查询同维");
834
+
835
+ const body = await (await fetch(`${base}/context?q=${encodeURIComponent("数据库选型")}`, { headers: auth })).json();
836
+ assert.equal(body.tier, "degraded", "维度不符 → 语义召回实际不可用,报降级而不是 full");
837
+ } finally {
838
+ close();
839
+ }
840
+ });
841
+
842
+ test("GET /context:库里还没有向量时不算维度不符(两种空的读数必须分开)", async () => {
843
+ // 「没有东西可比」与「维度对不上」是两件事:前者是全新库(或还没建索引),
844
+ // 语义路只是还没有内容,不是坏了。探针回 none 时必须继续报 full,否则每个新装
845
+ // 用户的第一次 /context 都是 degraded。
846
+ const { base, auth, close, store } = await setup({ embedder: okEmbedder });
847
+ try {
848
+ assert.deepEqual(store.vectorDimensionState(3), { state: "none" }, "夹具前置:行集为空,库里没有任何向量");
849
+ const body = await (await fetch(`${base}/context?q=${encodeURIComponent("数据库选型")}`, { headers: auth })).json();
850
+ assert.equal(body.tier, "full", "没有已存向量 → 不是维度不符");
851
+ } finally {
852
+ close();
853
+ }
854
+ });
855
+
856
+ // --- 降级原因契约(issue #508 Minor #1)----------------------------------------
857
+ // 缺陷本身:非空 q 但没有装配 embedder 时 diag.reason 不赋值,日志靠兜底表达式拼出
858
+ // `no-embedder`,而文档声明的枚举里没有这个值;同一表达式里还躺着第二个越界字面量
859
+ // `embed-failed`。按枚举解析日志的运维程序会整条漏掉这一种**已测试**的降级路径。
860
+ // 根因是「日志契约没有测试锁」:setup() 曾把 logger 硬编码成 null,全仓没有任何一条
861
+ // 测试观测过那行 warn 的内容。下面把三侧钉在一起——代码导出的枚举、六条降级路径的实吐
862
+ // 值、两份文档声明的集合。
863
+
864
+ const DEGRADE_LOG_PREFIX = "dsh-mneme: /context degraded to the rule tier (";
865
+
866
+ /** 从抓到的 warn 行里抽出括号内的 reason 令牌,顺带锁前缀字面量(两份文档都写了它)。 */
867
+ function degradedReason(logs) {
868
+ const line = logs.find((l) => l.startsWith(DEGRADE_LOG_PREFIX));
869
+ assert.ok(line, `必须打出降级 warn(前缀 ${DEGRADE_LOG_PREFIX}),实际:${JSON.stringify(logs)}`);
870
+ const token = line.slice(DEGRADE_LOG_PREFIX.length, -1);
871
+ assert.ok(token.length > 0, "reason 令牌不许为空(兜底默认值已删,漏记账会在这里露出 (undefined))");
872
+ return token;
873
+ }
874
+
875
+ test("降级原因枚举:代码导出、README、docs/DAEMON 三侧同一个集合", () => {
876
+ // 枚举从常量派生,不把字符串再抄一遍——新增第七个值时必须改这一个常量 + 两份文档,
877
+ // 漏一边这里就红。
878
+ assert.ok(Object.isFrozen(CONTEXT_DEGRADE_REASONS), "枚举必须是 frozen 常量");
879
+ const docTokens = new Set();
880
+ for (const file of ["README.md", "docs/DAEMON.md"]) {
881
+ const text = readFileSync(new URL(`../${file}`, import.meta.url), "utf8");
882
+ // 只收降级原因形状的反引号令牌:`embed-<suffix>` 或 `no-embedder`。bare `embed`、
883
+ // `--embed off` 不是枚举成员,别收进来。注意「embedder」是一个词,所以匹配必须是
884
+ // `^(?:embed-|no-embed)`——写成 `embed-[a-z]+` 会把 no-embedder 整条漏掉,而那正是
885
+ // #508 Minor 漏掉它的同一种手法。
886
+ for (const m of text.matchAll(/`([a-z][a-z-]*)`/g)) {
887
+ if (/^(?:embed-|no-embed)/.test(m[1])) docTokens.add(m[1]);
888
+ }
889
+ }
890
+ assert.deepEqual(
891
+ [...docTokens].sort(),
892
+ [...CONTEXT_DEGRADE_REASONS].sort(),
893
+ "两份文档声明的降级原因必须与代码导出的枚举同集合(改一边忘另一边会红)"
894
+ );
895
+ });
896
+
897
+ test("每条降级路径写进日志的 reason 都是枚举成员(#508 的日志契约)", async () => {
898
+ // 六条路径逐个抓 warn 行抽 reason。embed-dimension 那条要夹具(库里得有旧维度向量),
899
+ // 其余五条纯 embedder 形状。每条都断言令牌 ∈ CONTEXT_DEGRADE_REASONS——枚举外的值
900
+ // 在这里变红,这正是当初漏掉 no-embedder 的那道门。
901
+ const paths = [
902
+ {
903
+ name: "没装配 embedder(daemon --embed off / lightMode)",
904
+ embedder: null,
905
+ reason: "no-embedder",
906
+ note: "预期态不是故障,所以它必须是枚举里一个有自己的名字,而不是并进 embed-unavailable"
907
+ },
908
+ {
909
+ name: "embedder 对象上没有 embedSingle / embed",
910
+ embedder: {},
911
+ reason: "embed-unavailable"
912
+ },
913
+ {
914
+ name: "接口返回空数组",
915
+ embedder: { embedSingle: async () => [], embed: async () => [] },
916
+ reason: "embed-empty"
917
+ },
918
+ {
919
+ name: "接口挂起,被超时护栏按缺失处理",
920
+ embedder: { embedSingle: () => new Promise(() => {}), embed: () => new Promise(() => {}) },
921
+ embedTimeoutMs: 30,
922
+ reason: "embed-timeout"
923
+ },
924
+ {
925
+ name: "接口抛错",
926
+ embedder: { embedSingle: async () => { throw new Error("model offline"); } },
927
+ reason: "embed-error"
928
+ }
929
+ ];
930
+ for (const path of paths) {
931
+ const logs = [];
932
+ const { base, auth, close } = await setup({
933
+ embedder: path.embedder,
934
+ embedTimeoutMs: path.embedTimeoutMs,
935
+ logger: { info: () => {}, warn: (m) => logs.push(String(m)) }
936
+ });
937
+ try {
938
+ await saveMemory(base, auth, { type: "decision", title: "核心决策", content: "选定 SQLite 单文件库", importance: 5 });
939
+ const body = await (await fetch(`${base}/context?q=${encodeURIComponent("数据库选型")}`, { headers: auth })).json();
940
+ assert.equal(body.tier, "degraded", `${path.name} → 降级档`);
941
+ const reason = degradedReason(logs);
942
+ assert.equal(reason, path.reason, `${path.name} → reason${path.note ? `(${path.note})` : ""}`);
943
+ assert.ok(CONTEXT_DEGRADE_REASONS.includes(reason), `${reason} 必须 ∈ 导出的枚举`);
944
+ } finally {
945
+ close();
946
+ }
947
+ }
948
+ });
949
+
950
+ test("维度不符写进日志的 reason 是 embed-dimension(枚举成员)", async () => {
951
+ const logs = [];
952
+ const { base, auth, close, store, service } = await setup({
953
+ embedder: okEmbedder,
954
+ logger: { info: () => {}, warn: (m) => logs.push(String(m)) }
955
+ });
956
+ try {
957
+ await saveMemory(base, auth, { type: "decision", title: "核心决策", content: "选定 SQLite 单文件库", importance: 5 });
958
+ const memory = service.all().find((m) => m.title === "核心决策");
959
+ store.setEmbedding(memory.id, [1, 0, 0, 0]);
960
+ const body = await (await fetch(`${base}/context?q=${encodeURIComponent("数据库选型")}`, { headers: auth })).json();
961
+ assert.equal(body.tier, "degraded");
962
+ assert.equal(degradedReason(logs), "embed-dimension");
963
+ } finally {
964
+ close();
965
+ }
966
+ });
967
+
968
+ // --- 维度探针(issue #508 Major + Minor #2)------------------------------------
969
+ // Major:LIMIT 1 拿任意一条向量代表全库,混合维度库里两个方向都错。抽到与查询不符的那条
970
+ // → 明明有可比的向量却误报 degraded;首条恰好解析失败 → 其余有效向量都不匹配时又漏报成
971
+ // full。判据换成存在性:有没有一条活跃向量的维度等于查询维度。
972
+ // Minor #2:探针自身抛异常(库被锁 / 半开)会掉进最终 .catch(),把已经算好的 items 丢掉
973
+ // 并回 500——违反 fail-closed。隔离在调用侧,tier 留 unknown。
974
+
975
+ /** 库内插入序的 id(探针的行集顺序即插入序,无 ORDER BY 的全表扫)。 */
976
+ function insertedIds(store) {
977
+ return store.db.prepare("SELECT id FROM memories ORDER BY rowid").all().map((r) => r.id);
978
+ }
979
+
980
+ test("混合维度库:有一条与查询同维的活跃向量 → full,不误报 degraded(#508 Major 场景一)", async () => {
981
+ // LIMIT 1 时代这条是红的:先插入的旧维度行被抽中 → 判「维度不符」,而库里明明躺着
982
+ // 一条可比的 3 维向量,语义召回并没有死。
983
+ const { base, auth, close, store } = await setup({ embedder: okEmbedder });
984
+ try {
985
+ await saveMemory(base, auth, { type: "decision", title: "旧维度行", content: "四维向量", importance: 5 });
986
+ await saveMemory(base, auth, { type: "decision", title: "新维度行", content: "三维向量", importance: 5 });
987
+ const [oldId, newId] = insertedIds(store);
988
+ store.setEmbedding(oldId, [1, 0, 0, 0]); // 先插入 = 旧维度
989
+ store.setEmbedding(newId, [1, 0, 0]); // 后插入 = 与查询同维
990
+ assert.deepEqual(store.vectorDimensionState(3), { state: "match" }, "夹具前置:库里有一条 3 维活跃向量");
991
+
992
+ const body = await (await fetch(`${base}/context?q=${encodeURIComponent("数据库选型")}`, { headers: auth })).json();
993
+ assert.equal(body.tier, "full", "有可比向量 → 语义路通,不能因为抽到 4 维那条就误报降级");
994
+ } finally {
995
+ close();
996
+ }
997
+ });
998
+
999
+ test("首条向量损坏、其余有效向量都不匹配 → degraded,不误报 full(#508 Major 场景二)", async () => {
1000
+ // LIMIT 1 时代这条也是红的:首条解析失败 → 探针回 null → 走「库里没有向量」分支 → full,
1001
+ // 而语义召回其实整条是死的。
1002
+ const { base, auth, close, store } = await setup({ embedder: okEmbedder });
1003
+ try {
1004
+ await saveMemory(base, auth, { type: "decision", title: "损坏行", content: "向量文本损坏", importance: 5 });
1005
+ await saveMemory(base, auth, { type: "decision", title: "旧维度行", content: "四维向量", importance: 5 });
1006
+ const [brokenId, oldDimId] = insertedIds(store);
1007
+ // 直接改列,不走 setEmbedding(那条路会归一成 JSON.stringify(array),造不出损坏文本)。
1008
+ store.db.prepare("UPDATE memories SET embedding = ? WHERE id = ?").run("{not json", brokenId);
1009
+ store.setEmbedding(oldDimId, [1, 0, 0, 0]);
1010
+ assert.deepEqual(store.vectorDimensionState(3), { state: "mismatch" }, "夹具前置:有向量、没有一条与 3 维查询同维");
1011
+
1012
+ const body = await (await fetch(`${base}/context?q=${encodeURIComponent("数据库选型")}`, { headers: auth })).json();
1013
+ assert.equal(body.tier, "degraded", "首条损坏不该把 mismatch 洗成 full");
1014
+ } finally {
1015
+ close();
1016
+ }
1017
+ });
1018
+
1019
+ test("有行但一条向量都读不出来 → unknown,不是 full(两种空必须分开)", async () => {
1020
+ // 「还没有内容」(none → full)与「内容在那儿却读不出来」(unreadable)是两种空。
1021
+ // 后者判不出来,按 fail-closed 报 unknown,绝不因为读不到就宣称 full。
1022
+ const logs = [];
1023
+ const { base, auth, close, store } = await setup({
1024
+ embedder: okEmbedder,
1025
+ logger: { info: () => {}, warn: (m) => logs.push(String(m)) }
1026
+ });
1027
+ try {
1028
+ await saveMemory(base, auth, { type: "decision", title: "损坏行", content: "向量文本损坏", importance: 5 });
1029
+ const [brokenId] = insertedIds(store);
1030
+ store.db.prepare("UPDATE memories SET embedding = ? WHERE id = ?").run("{not json", brokenId);
1031
+ assert.deepEqual(store.vectorDimensionState(3), { state: "unreadable" }, "夹具前置:行集非空但零条可解析");
1032
+
1033
+ const body = await (await fetch(`${base}/context?q=${encodeURIComponent("数据库选型")}`, { headers: auth })).json();
1034
+ assert.equal(body.tier, "unknown", "读不出任何向量 → 判不出来,不宣称 full");
1035
+ assert.ok(body.items.length > 0, "items 照常返回");
1036
+ // unknown 在响应体里只有一个键,分不出「空 q」与「判不出来」;留痕只能走日志,
1037
+ // 否则调用方对 unknown 的策略是「不告警」时,这条故障就从运维面上整个消失。
1038
+ assert.ok(
1039
+ logs.some((l) => l.startsWith("dsh-mneme: /context tier left unknown: no comparable vector readable (unreadable)")),
1040
+ `判不出来必须留痕(不是降级原因枚举的一员),实际:${JSON.stringify(logs)}`
1041
+ );
1042
+ } finally {
1043
+ close();
1044
+ }
1045
+ });
1046
+
1047
+ test("维度探针抛异常 → tier=unknown 且 items 不丢,绝不 500(#508 Minor #2)", async () => {
1048
+ const logs = [];
1049
+ const { base, auth, close, service } = await setup({
1050
+ embedder: okEmbedder,
1051
+ logger: { info: () => {}, warn: (m) => logs.push(String(m)) }
1052
+ });
1053
+ try {
1054
+ await saveMemory(base, auth, { type: "decision", title: "核心决策", content: "选定 SQLite 单文件库", importance: 5 });
1055
+ // 仓内惯用的故障注入(同 test/audit.test.js / test/conflict-freeze.test.js)。
1056
+ service.vectorDimensionState = () => { throw new Error("database is locked"); };
1057
+
1058
+ const res = await fetch(`${base}/context?q=${encodeURIComponent("数据库选型")}`, { headers: auth });
1059
+ assert.equal(res.status, 200, "探针异常不许把已经算好的 items 变成 500");
1060
+ const body = await res.json();
1061
+ assert.equal(body.tier, "unknown", "判不出来 → unknown,不宣称 full");
1062
+ assert.ok(body.items.length > 0, "已经算好的 items 不许被丢掉");
1063
+ assert.ok(
1064
+ logs.some((l) => l.startsWith("dsh-mneme: /context tier left unknown: dimension probe failed (Error: database is locked)")),
1065
+ `探针故障必须留痕,实际:${JSON.stringify(logs)}`
1066
+ );
1067
+ assert.ok(!logs.some((l) => l.startsWith(DEGRADE_LOG_PREFIX)), "tier 不是 degraded,不该打降级 warn");
1068
+ } finally {
1069
+ close();
1070
+ }
1071
+ });
1072
+
1073
+ test("探针没跑成(方法缺失 / 返回垃圾 / 异步漂移)一律 unknown,不宣称 full", async () => {
1074
+ // typeof 守卫与 sentinel 都要 fail-closed:旧实现里这三种都落到「不是 number」分支
1075
+ // 报 full。异步漂移那条是纪律锁——try/catch 只能同步包住一个同步调用,探针一旦被
1076
+ // 改成异步,抛错就重新变成 rejection 落回最终 .catch()。
1077
+ const shapes = [
1078
+ { name: "方法缺失(旧装配)", patch: (s) => { delete s.vectorDimensionState; } },
1079
+ { name: "返回字符串", patch: (s) => { s.vectorDimensionState = () => "3"; } },
1080
+ { name: "返回 undefined", patch: (s) => { s.vectorDimensionState = () => undefined; } },
1081
+ { name: "返回 Promise(异步漂移)", patch: (s) => { s.vectorDimensionState = () => Promise.resolve({ state: "match" }); } }
1082
+ ];
1083
+ for (const shape of shapes) {
1084
+ const { base, auth, close, service } = await setup({ embedder: okEmbedder });
1085
+ try {
1086
+ await saveMemory(base, auth, { type: "decision", title: "核心决策", content: "选定 SQLite 单文件库", importance: 5 });
1087
+ shape.patch(service);
1088
+ const body = await (await fetch(`${base}/context?q=${encodeURIComponent("数据库选型")}`, { headers: auth })).json();
1089
+ assert.equal(body.tier, "unknown", `${shape.name} → 判不出来,不宣称 full`);
1090
+ } finally {
1091
+ close();
1092
+ }
1093
+ }
1094
+ });
1095
+
1096
+ test("探针失败与降级 warn 自身抛错也不许把响应变成 500(logger 来自宿主,warn 会抛)", async () => {
1097
+ // `logger?.warn?.()` 只防 logger 缺失,防不了 warn 自己抛错(宿主 stdout 管道断裂时
1098
+ // 真实可发生)。items 算好之后,日志通道坏了不是丢掉它的理由。
1099
+ const logs = [];
1100
+ const logger = { info: () => {}, warn: (m) => { logs.push(String(m)); throw new Error("stderr broken"); } };
1101
+ const { base, auth, close, service } = await setup({ embedder: okEmbedder, logger });
1102
+ try {
1103
+ await saveMemory(base, auth, { type: "decision", title: "核心决策", content: "选定 SQLite 单文件库", importance: 5 });
1104
+ service.vectorDimensionState = () => { throw new Error("boom"); };
1105
+ const res = await fetch(`${base}/context?q=${encodeURIComponent("数据库选型")}`, { headers: auth });
1106
+ assert.equal(res.status, 200, "warn 自身抛错 + 探针抛错 → 仍然 200");
1107
+ assert.equal((await res.json()).tier, "unknown");
1108
+
1109
+ // 降级路径同样:warn 抛错被自己的 try/catch 吃掉,tier 与 items 不受影响。
1110
+ service.vectorDimensionState = () => ({ state: "mismatch" });
1111
+ const degraded = await fetch(`${base}/context?q=${encodeURIComponent("数据库选型")}`, { headers: auth });
1112
+ assert.equal(degraded.status, 200, "降级 warn 抛错也不许 500");
1113
+ assert.equal((await degraded.json()).tier, "degraded");
1114
+ } finally {
1115
+ close();
1116
+ }
1117
+ });
1118
+
1119
+ test("维度探针状态机:五种读数各自归位(含 invalid 的 fail-closed 兜底)", async () => {
1120
+ // 直接锁 store 的状态机:match / mismatch / none / unreadable / invalid。
1121
+ // invalid 当前 /context 不可达(embedQueryVector 保证返回非空数组),但它不许落到
1122
+ // full 上——「判不了」与「没有东西可比」不是同一个读数。
1123
+ const { store, close } = await setup();
1124
+ try {
1125
+ assert.deepEqual(store.vectorDimensionState(3), { state: "none" }, "空库 → 行集为空");
1126
+ assert.deepEqual(store.vectorDimensionState(0), { state: "invalid" });
1127
+ assert.deepEqual(store.vectorDimensionState(-1), { state: "invalid" });
1128
+ assert.deepEqual(store.vectorDimensionState(2.5), { state: "invalid" });
1129
+ assert.deepEqual(store.vectorDimensionState("3"), { state: "invalid" });
1130
+
1131
+ const a = store.save({ type: "decision", title: "同维", content: "c", importance: 4 });
1132
+ const b = store.save({ type: "decision", title: "异维", content: "c", importance: 4 });
1133
+ store.setEmbedding(a.id, [1, 0, 0]);
1134
+ store.setEmbedding(b.id, [1, 0, 0, 0]);
1135
+ assert.deepEqual(store.vectorDimensionState(3), { state: "match" }, "有一条同维 → match(短路,不看完)");
1136
+ assert.deepEqual(store.vectorDimensionState(5), { state: "mismatch" }, "有向量但没有一条同维 → mismatch");
1137
+
1138
+ // 清掉解析缓存再写坏列(getParsedEmbedding 只缓存成功解析,缓存在的话直接改列看不见)。
1139
+ store.setEmbedding(a.id, null);
1140
+ store.setEmbedding(b.id, null);
1141
+ store.db.prepare("UPDATE memories SET embedding = ? WHERE id = ?").run("{oops", a.id);
1142
+ store.db.prepare("UPDATE memories SET embedding = ? WHERE id = ?").run("[]", b.id);
1143
+ assert.deepEqual(store.vectorDimensionState(3), { state: "unreadable" }, "有行但零条可解析 → unreadable(不是 none)");
1144
+ } finally {
1145
+ close();
1146
+ }
1147
+ });
1148
+
1149
+ // --- GET /memory/provenance:记忆级溯源读出口(#399 写、#421 读)-------------
1150
+ // daemon 侧此前和宿主内 API 一样只有写入路径:库里有答案,外部拿不到。
1151
+ //
1152
+ // #509 评审整改:这个面吃 distillRecords.enabled(与写侧同一个开关、同一个判据),
1153
+ // 关着时 409 {error:"distill-records-disabled"}。createStandaloneApi 的 config 缺省
1154
+ // {},而 {} 在这道门上的含义就是「关」(fail-closed)——所以下面的用例必须显式把
1155
+ // 开关打开,没有一个「默认开」的路径。
1156
+ const RECORDS_ON = { distillRecords: { enabled: true } };
1157
+
1158
+ test("GET /memory/provenance returns windows with their original rows", async () => {
1159
+ const { base, auth, store, close } = await setup({ config: RECORDS_ON });
1160
+ try {
1161
+ const saved = await saveMemory(base, auth, { type: "decision", title: "核心决策", content: "选定 SQLite 单文件库", importance: 5 });
1162
+ const memoryId = saved.memory?.id ?? saved.id;
1163
+ store.saveMemoryProvenance({
1164
+ memoryId, sessionId: "s1", seqStart: 10, seqEnd: 11, createdAt: "2026-10-23T00:00:00Z"
1165
+ });
1166
+ store.saveDistillRecords([
1167
+ { sessionId: "s1", seq: 10, role: "user", text: "第一句原文", windowId: "w1", distilledAt: "2026-10-23T00:00:00Z" },
1168
+ { sessionId: "s1", seq: 11, role: "assistant", text: "第二句原文", windowId: "w1", distilledAt: "2026-10-23T00:00:00Z" }
1169
+ ]);
1170
+
1171
+ const res = await fetch(`${base}/memory/provenance?id=${encodeURIComponent(memoryId)}`, { headers: auth });
1172
+ assert.equal(res.status, 200);
1173
+ const body = await res.json();
1174
+ assert.equal(body.memoryId, memoryId);
1175
+ assert.equal(body.windows.length, 1);
1176
+ assert.equal(body.windows[0].session_id, "s1");
1177
+ assert.deepEqual(body.windows[0].records.map((r) => r.text), ["第一句原文", "第二句原文"], "原文按 seq 升序");
1178
+ } finally {
1179
+ close();
1180
+ }
1181
+ });
1182
+
1183
+ test("GET /memory/provenance: a memory with no link answers with empty windows, not an error", async () => {
1184
+ const { base, auth, close } = await setup({ config: RECORDS_ON });
1185
+ try {
1186
+ const saved = await saveMemory(base, auth, { type: "preference", title: "语言", content: "中文" });
1187
+ const memoryId = saved.memory?.id ?? saved.id;
1188
+ const res = await fetch(`${base}/memory/provenance?id=${encodeURIComponent(memoryId)}`, { headers: auth });
1189
+ assert.equal(res.status, 200);
1190
+ assert.deepEqual((await res.json()).windows, [], "「不是蒸馏来的」是有效答案,不是错误");
1191
+ } finally {
1192
+ close();
1193
+ }
1194
+ });
1195
+
1196
+ test("GET /memory/provenance is auth-gated and 400s on a missing id", async () => {
1197
+ const { base, auth, close } = await setup({ config: RECORDS_ON });
1198
+ try {
1199
+ const noToken = await fetch(`${base}/memory/provenance?id=x`);
1200
+ assert.equal(noToken.status, 401, "只读端点也在 apiToken 之下(与 /memories 同口径)");
1201
+
1202
+ const missing = await fetch(`${base}/memory/provenance`, { headers: auth });
1203
+ assert.equal(missing.status, 400);
1204
+ } finally {
1205
+ close();
1206
+ }
1207
+ });
1208
+
1209
+ test("GET /memory/provenance: distillRecords.enabled off answers 409, not 404 and not empty windows", async () => {
1210
+ // #509 评审整改。四个刻度必须分开:401 没鉴权 / 400 缺 id / 409 用户关了 /
1211
+ // 503 装配没接线 / 200 空 windows = 「这条记忆不是蒸馏来的」。把「关了」报成 404,
1212
+ // 调用方会按本仓既有的「404 = 命名的东西不存在」(/memories/:id)读成「这条记忆
1213
+ // 不存在」——而这两种误读的后续动作完全不同(一个去开开关,一个去查这条记忆)。
1214
+ const { base, auth, close } = await setup({ config: { distillRecords: { enabled: false } } });
1215
+ try {
1216
+ const saved = await saveMemory(base, auth, { type: "decision", title: "核心决策", content: "选定 SQLite 单文件库", importance: 5 });
1217
+ const memoryId = saved.memory?.id ?? saved.id;
1218
+ const res = await fetch(`${base}/memory/provenance?id=${encodeURIComponent(memoryId)}`, { headers: auth });
1219
+ assert.equal(res.status, 409);
1220
+ assert.deepEqual(await res.json(), { error: "distill-records-disabled" }, "body 只准 error 一个键");
1221
+ } finally {
1222
+ close();
1223
+ }
1224
+ });
1225
+
1226
+ test("GET /memory/provenance: no config at all is fail-closed (409)", async () => {
1227
+ // 构造时不传 config(createStandaloneApi 的默认 {}):这个端点返回逐字原文,
1228
+ // 默认方向必须是「不读」。别把 409 当 bug 修成默认开。
1229
+ const { base, auth, close } = await setup();
1230
+ try {
1231
+ const res = await fetch(`${base}/memory/provenance?id=m1`, { headers: auth });
1232
+ assert.equal(res.status, 409);
1233
+ assert.deepEqual(await res.json(), { error: "distill-records-disabled" });
1234
+ } finally {
1235
+ close();
1236
+ }
1237
+ });
1238
+
1239
+ test("GET /memory/provenance: 400 beats 409 and 409 is not an existence oracle", async () => {
1240
+ const { base, auth, close } = await setup({ config: { distillRecords: { enabled: false } } });
1241
+ try {
1242
+ const missing = await fetch(`${base}/memory/provenance`, { headers: auth });
1243
+ assert.equal(missing.status, 400, "缺 id 是语法畸形,排在功能开关之前");
1244
+
1245
+ // 关着时已知 id 与未知 id 同一个答案,否则这个端点能用来枚举「哪些记忆有原文」。
1246
+ const saved = await saveMemory(base, auth, { type: "preference", title: "语言", content: "中文" });
1247
+ const known = saved.memory?.id ?? saved.id;
1248
+ for (const id of [known, "nope"]) {
1249
+ const res = await fetch(`${base}/memory/provenance?id=${encodeURIComponent(id)}`, { headers: auth });
1250
+ assert.equal(res.status, 409, `${id} → 409`);
1251
+ assert.deepEqual(await res.json(), { error: "distill-records-disabled" });
1252
+ }
1253
+ } finally {
1254
+ close();
1255
+ }
1256
+ });
1257
+
1258
+ test("GET /memory/provenance: 409 beats 503 — feature off is more specific than unwired", async () => {
1259
+ // 关着 + service 上连 distillRecordsFor 都没有(旧装配 / headless):报 503 会让人
1260
+ // 去查一个没坏的部署。与 api.js:525-526 立的两段式同构。
1261
+ const { base, auth, service, close } = await setup({ config: { distillRecords: { enabled: false } } });
1262
+ try {
1263
+ delete service.distillRecordsFor;
1264
+ const res = await fetch(`${base}/memory/provenance?id=x`, { headers: auth });
1265
+ assert.equal(res.status, 409);
1266
+ assert.equal((await res.json()).error, "distill-records-disabled");
1267
+ } finally {
1268
+ close();
1269
+ }
1270
+ });
@@ -0,0 +1,75 @@
1
+ // issue #502:#493 的第二种形态。JSON 是合法的,条目却被 `VALID` 全部滤掉——过去这
2
+ // 和「模型压根没写数组」共用一句 `invalid summary JSON`,而两者要修的地方完全不同,
3
+ // 更要命的是失败路径游标不推进:同一个窗口会被一遍遍重放(社区报告的实测:0.9.4 装上
4
+ // 之后 summarize 解冻了,隔 19 秒又来一条 invalid,输入 2711→输出 2047)。
5
+ // 本文件锁三层:判据分得开、读数说得出是哪一种、以及 prompt 与枚举从此一致(中英两份)。
6
+ import test from "node:test";
7
+ import assert from "node:assert/strict";
8
+ import { parseSummaryJsonResult, summarizeParseFailureAudit } from "../src/summarize.js";
9
+ import { STR } from "../src/lang.js";
10
+
11
+ const GOOD = { type: "project", title: "发布只在包目录内", content: "根目录发过坏包。" };
12
+ // 报告现场的原样形状:自造中文分类 + 多带 id/source 键
13
+ const BOGUS = [
14
+ { id: 1, type: "环境/版本", content: "本地安装的 @modusensus/dsh-mneme 版本为 0.9.4", source: "工具结果:版本确认" },
15
+ { id: "user_intent", type: "用户需求", content: "希望插件不再重复询问", source: "用户输入" }
16
+ ];
17
+
18
+ test("filtered-empty:JSON 合法、条目全被枚举滤掉,要能报出 arr/valid 两个数", () => {
19
+ const r = parseSummaryJsonResult(JSON.stringify(BOGUS));
20
+ assert.equal(r.ok, false, "全被滤掉的窗口不能算成功(否则会永久推进游标)");
21
+ assert.equal(r.failure.kind, "filtered-empty");
22
+ assert.equal(r.failure.arrCount, 2);
23
+ assert.deepEqual(r.failure.sampleTypes, ["环境/版本", "用户需求"],
24
+ "把模型实际用的分类词原样带出来——不看这一眼就得去猜");
25
+
26
+ const audit = summarizeParseFailureAudit(JSON.stringify(BOGUS), r.failure);
27
+ assert.equal(audit.errorMessage, "no valid summary entries (arr=2, valid=0)");
28
+ assert.equal(audit.metadata.failure_kind, "filtered-empty");
29
+ assert.equal(audit.metadata.arr_count, 2);
30
+ assert.equal(audit.metadata.invalid_entries, 2);
31
+ assert.equal(audit.metadata.raw_has_bracket, true, "有方括号正是这一型的特征:它不是「没写格式」");
32
+ assert.equal(audit.metadata.parse_failure, true);
33
+ });
34
+
35
+ test("no-array:模型在说话而不是在输出,判据与 filtered-empty 必须分开", () => {
36
+ const raw = "我觉得这批内容挺有意思,我来点评一下:第一,版本确认很重要……";
37
+ const r = parseSummaryJsonResult(raw);
38
+ assert.equal(r.ok, false);
39
+ assert.equal(r.failure.kind, "no-array");
40
+ const audit = summarizeParseFailureAudit(raw, r.failure);
41
+ assert.equal(audit.errorMessage, "invalid summary JSON", "这一型才该用原来那句话");
42
+ assert.equal(audit.metadata.raw_has_bracket, false);
43
+ assert.equal(audit.metadata.sample_types, undefined, "没有数组可言,不许编出 arr_count");
44
+ assert.equal(audit.metadata.arr_count, undefined);
45
+ });
46
+
47
+ test("有合法条目时不产出 failure(成功路径不被诊断字段污染)", () => {
48
+ const r = parseSummaryJsonResult(JSON.stringify([GOOD]));
49
+ assert.equal(r.ok, true);
50
+ assert.equal(r.failure, undefined);
51
+ assert.equal(r.entries.length, 1);
52
+ });
53
+
54
+ test("raw_tail 只在正文确实长于头部窗口时给(短输出不重复贴一遍)", () => {
55
+ const short = JSON.stringify(BOGUS);
56
+ assert.equal(summarizeParseFailureAudit(short, { kind: "filtered-empty", arrCount: 2, sampleTypes: [] }).metadata.raw_tail, undefined);
57
+ const long = JSON.stringify(BOGUS) + " ".repeat(600) + "尾巴在这里:后面其实还有半段点评";
58
+ const meta = summarizeParseFailureAudit(long, { kind: "filtered-empty", arrCount: 2, sampleTypes: [] }).metadata;
59
+ assert.ok(meta.raw_tail.includes("尾巴在这里"), "「先写几条合法再跑偏」的输出,只有尾巴能看出来");
60
+ assert.ok(meta.raw_head.length <= 300);
61
+ });
62
+
63
+ // prompt 与闸门对齐(报告者的第 3 条,零行为变更):菜单给全 7 个值、并写明不许自造。
64
+ // 中英两份都要锁——只改一种语言,另一种语言的窗口照样被滤空,而守卫看不见「两边一起过期」。
65
+ test("summary 提示词的枚举与 VALID 对齐,且中英两份都写明不许自造分类", () => {
66
+ const all = ["preference", "project", "decision", "history", "rejected_solution", "pitfall", "constraint"];
67
+ for (const lang of ["zh", "en"]) {
68
+ const p = STR.prompts.summary[lang];
69
+ for (const t of all) assert.ok(p.includes(t), `summary(${lang}) 枚举缺 ${t}`);
70
+ assert.match(lang === "zh" ? p : p, /只能取上面枚举|must be one of the enumerated/, `summary(${lang}) 缺「不许自造分类」的约束`);
71
+ assert.match(p, /id、source|id, source/, `summary(${lang}) 要写明不许附加 id/source 等额外键`);
72
+ }
73
+ // codingSummary 本来就列全了,确认没被这次批量替换改坏(它多出的说明句还在)
74
+ assert.ok(STR.prompts.codingSummary.zh.includes("rejected_solution") && STR.prompts.codingSummary.zh.includes("pitfall"));
75
+ });