@modusensus/dsh-mneme 0.13.0 → 0.14.0-beta.2

package/test/differentiate-feedback.test.js

@@ -1,248 +1,248 @@
-// Issue #533：differentiate 的正反馈死循环回归护栏。
-//
-// 现象（issue #533 实测）：sleepActionSet="full" 下，一对高相似记忆被判成
-// differentiate，旧实现把**同一段**差异注记同时追加到两侧正文，指望"注记进
-// embedding 后下一轮不再判重复"。离线复现证明恰好相反——两侧共享同一段后缀会让
-// 向量同向靠拢（0.876 → 0.960 只用 5 轮，把注记截到 0 字照样往上爬，因为推高相似
-// 度的是共享前缀本身而不是注记长短），于是下一轮又被判重复、又追加一段，实测单条
-// 堆到 19 段、正文 150 字膨胀到 2200+ 字。
-//
-// 现在的契约：differentiate **不改正文**，裁决落 differentiated_pairs 账本；候选
-// 构造阶段读账本，已裁决且两侧正文未变就不送模型。本文件锁的就是这两件事——
-// 「正文不变」和「第二轮不再花钱」。
-import test from "node:test";
-import assert from "node:assert/strict";
-import { applyDecisions, validateDecisions } from "../src/dream/decisions.js";
-import { createStore } from "../src/store.js";
-import { createService } from "../src/service.js";
-import { createVectorIndex } from "../src/vector-index.js";
-import { runSleep } from "../src/dream/sleep.js";
-
-const embedder = {
-  // 批量接口要按输入条数返回（向量回填走这一条），返回单个向量会让 usable 判空。
-  embedSingle: async () => [1, 0, 0],
-  embed: async (texts) => (Array.isArray(texts) ? texts.map(() => [1, 0, 0]) : [1, 0, 0]),
-  schedule: () => {},
-  modelHash: "mock#1",
-  dimension: 3
-};
-
-function setup() {
-  const store = createStore(":memory:");
-  const service = createService({ store, mirror: null, config: {} });
-  const vectorIndex = createVectorIndex({ store });
-  service.setEmbedder(embedder);
-  service.setVectorIndex(vectorIndex);
-  return { store, service, vectorIndex };
-}
-
-function makeMemory(service, title, content, type = "project") {
-  return service.saveWithDedupe({ type, title, content, importance: 3 }).memory;
-}
-
-function snapshotOf(store, ...mems) {
-  return new Map(mems.map((m) => [m.id, store.getById(m.id)]));
-}
-
-function captureCtx(reply) {
-  const seen = [];
-  return {
-    seen,
-    logger: { warn: () => {}, info: () => {} },
-    agentDefaultModel: { currentSelection: () => ({ provider: "mock", model: "sleep-model" }) },
-    llm: {
-      async *stream(options) {
-        seen.push(options.messages.find((m) => m.system ?? m.role === "system")?.content?.[0]?.text ?? "");
-        yield { type: "text-delta", index: 0, text: typeof reply === "function" ? reply() : reply };
-        yield { type: "finish", reason: { kind: "stop" } };
-      }
-    }
-  };
-}
-
-function baseConfig(overrides = {}) {
-  return {
-    sleepModeEnabled: true,
-    sleepIdleMinutes: 5,
-    sleepMinIntervalHours: 8,
-    sleepConflictStrictness: "normal",
-    sleepArchiveDays: 30,
-    sleepCompressDays: 90,
-    sleepPatternMinMemories: 100,
-    sleepMaxPatternPerRun: 3,
-    ...overrides
-  };
-}
-
-function seedPair(service, vectorIndex, t1, t2, sim = 1.0) {
-  const a = makeMemory(service, t1, `${t1} 的内容`);
-  const b = makeMemory(service, t2, `${t2} 的内容`);
-  const sin = Math.sqrt(Math.max(0, 1 - sim * sim));
-  vectorIndex.saveEmbedding(a.id, [1, 0, 0]);
-  vectorIndex.saveEmbedding(b.id, [sim, sin, 0]);
-  return { a, b };
-}
-
-// ---------------------------------------------------------------- 正文不变
-
-test("issue#533: repeated differentiate with drifting wording never grows the bodies", () => {
-  const { service, store } = setup();
-  const a = makeMemory(service, "内网 SSH 端口", "内网走 22");
-  const b = makeMemory(service, "外网 SSH 端口", "外网映射 2222");
-  const before = { [a.id]: service.getById(a.id).content, [b.id]: service.getById(b.id).content };
-  // 模型每轮换一种说法——这正是字面 includes 幂等失效的场景，也是 issue 里单条堆到
-  // 19 段的真实成因。账本口径下措辞漂移不再产生任何正文副作用。
-  const wordings = [
-    ["内网直连", "外网映射"],
-    ["走内网", "走外网映射"],
-    ["内网那台直连", "外网那台做映射"],
-    ["内网的机器直连", "外网的机器走映射"],
-    ["内网直连（22）", "外网映射（2222）"]
-  ];
-  let appliedRounds = 0;
-  for (const distinctions of wordings) {
-    const snapshot = snapshotOf(store, service.getById(a.id), service.getById(b.id));
-    const { applied } = applyDecisions(
-      [{ action: "differentiate", ids: [a.id, b.id], distinctions }],
-      service, null, snapshot, {}
-    );
-    appliedRounds += applied;
-  }
-  assert.equal(appliedRounds, 1, "only the first round is a real verdict; the rest are idempotent");
-  // 这一条是 #533 的核心断言：无论判多少轮，正文长度一个字节都不许变。
-  assert.equal(service.getById(a.id).content, before[a.id], "side A body is byte-identical");
-  assert.equal(service.getById(b.id).content, before[b.id], "side B body is byte-identical");
-  assert.equal(service.getById(a.id).content.length, "内网走 22".length, "no note accumulates");
-  store.close();
-});
-
-test("issue#533: the ledger keeps one row per pair and refreshes the distinctions", () => {
-  const { service, store } = setup();
-  const a = makeMemory(service, "甲", "内容甲");
-  const b = makeMemory(service, "乙", "内容乙");
-  for (const distinctions of [["第一版"], ["第二版", "补充版"]]) {
-    applyDecisions(
-      [{ action: "differentiate", ids: [a.id, b.id], distinctions }],
-      service, null, snapshotOf(store, service.getById(a.id), service.getById(b.id)), {}
-    );
-  }
-  // 顺序归一：不管送审时谁在前，账本只有一行。
-  assert.equal(store.listDifferentiatedPairs().length, 1, "one pair, one row");
-  const record = service.findDifferentiatedPair(b.id, a.id);
-  assert.deepEqual(record.distinctions, ["第一版"], "an unchanged body keeps the original verdict");
-  store.close();
-});
-
-// -------------------------------------------------------------- 三层幂等
-
-test("issue#533: a body edited after the verdict re-opens the pair", () => {
-  const { service, store } = setup();
-  const a = makeMemory(service, "甲", "内容甲");
-  const b = makeMemory(service, "乙", "内容乙");
-  applyDecisions(
-    [{ action: "differentiate", ids: [a.id, b.id], distinctions: ["甲面", "乙面"] }],
-    service, null, snapshotOf(store, service.getById(a.id), service.getById(b.id)), {}
-  );
-  // 原样重放 → 幂等。
-  const replay = applyDecisions(
-    [{ action: "differentiate", ids: [a.id, b.id], distinctions: ["甲面", "乙面"] }],
-    service, null, snapshotOf(store, service.getById(a.id), service.getById(b.id)), {}
-  );
-  assert.equal(replay.applied, 0, "an unchanged pair is idempotent");
-  // 一侧被改写 → 结论可能不再成立，必须能重新裁决（宁可再判一次，不静音真的演化）。
-  service.update(a.id, { content: "内容甲被改写" });
-  const reopened = applyDecisions(
-    [{ action: "differentiate", ids: [a.id, b.id], distinctions: ["甲面", "乙面", "改写后"] }],
-    service, null, snapshotOf(store, service.getById(a.id), service.getById(b.id)), {}
-  );
-  assert.equal(reopened.applied, 1, "an edited side re-opens the pair");
-  assert.deepEqual(
-    service.findDifferentiatedPair(a.id, b.id).distinctions, ["甲面", "乙面", "改写后"],
-    "the refreshed verdict replaces the stale one"
-  );
-  store.close();
-});
-
-test("issue#533: legacy rows that still carry the old note are treated as adjudicated", () => {
-  const { service, store } = setup();
-  // 旧版本写进正文的注记块原样造出来（升级不清账：这些行没有账本行）。
-  const a = makeMemory(service, "甲", "内容甲\n\n（差异注记：甲面；乙面）");
-  const b = makeMemory(service, "乙", "内容乙\n\n（差异注记：甲面；乙面）");
-  const { applied } = applyDecisions(
-    [{ action: "differentiate", ids: [a.id, b.id], distinctions: ["甲面", "乙面"] }],
-    service, null, snapshotOf(store, service.getById(a.id), service.getById(b.id)), {}
-  );
-  assert.equal(applied, 0, "no ledger row is needed once both sides carry the note");
-  assert.equal(service.getById(a.id).content, "内容甲\n\n（差异注记：甲面；乙面）", "the legacy body is untouched");
-  store.close();
-});
-
-test("issue#533: a bare service without the ledger degrades to skipped, never throws", () => {
-  // 人工确认路径（service.js 的裸 applyService）没有账本透传——此时「正文不变」本身
-  // 就是全部副作用，没有账本就没有可写之处，只能是 skipped，不能算 applied。
-  const mems = new Map();
-  const bare = {
-    getById: (id) => mems.get(id) ?? null,
-    update: (id, patch) => { mems.set(id, { ...mems.get(id), ...patch }); },
-    setArchived: () => {},
-    transaction: (fn) => fn()
-  };
-  mems.set("a", { id: "a", title: "甲", content: "内容甲", archived: false });
-  mems.set("b", { id: "b", title: "乙", content: "内容乙", archived: false });
-  const { applied, failures } = applyDecisions(
-    [{ action: "differentiate", ids: ["a", "b"], distinctions: ["甲面", "乙面"] }],
-    bare, null, null, {}
-  );
-  assert.equal(applied, 0, "nothing to record, nothing applied");
-  assert.equal(failures.length, 0, "degrades cleanly");
-  assert.equal(mems.get("a").content, "内容甲", "still never touches the body");
-});
-
-// ------------------------------------------------------- 候选构造阶段抑制
-
-test("issue#533: a second sleep cycle does not pay for an already-adjudicated pair", async () => {
-  const { service, store, vectorIndex } = setup();
-  const { a, b } = seedPair(service, vectorIndex, "甲端口", "乙端口");
-  const reply = () => JSON.stringify([
-    { action: "differentiate", ids: [a.id, b.id], distinctions: ["甲面", "乙面"] }
-  ]);
-  const ctx1 = captureCtx(reply);
-  const first = await runSleep(ctx1, service, baseConfig({ sleepActionSet: "full" }), ctx1.logger, { embedder, vectorIndex }, null);
-  assert.equal(first.phases.conflicts.applied, 1, "the first cycle adjudicates the pair");
-  const callsAfterFirst = ctx1.seen.length;
-  assert.ok(service.findDifferentiatedPair(a.id, b.id), "the verdict landed in the ledger");
-
-  // 第二轮：同一对、同一相似度，账本命中且两侧正文未变 → 候选在送 LLM 之前就被压掉。
-  const ctx2 = captureCtx(reply);
-  const second = await runSleep(ctx2, service, baseConfig({ sleepActionSet: "full" }), ctx2.logger, { embedder, vectorIndex }, null);
-  assert.equal(second.phases.conflicts.status, "noop", "the phase has nothing left to adjudicate");
-  assert.equal(second.phases.conflicts.suppressed, 1, "the pair is accounted for, not silently dropped");
-  // 只数冲突阶段那次调用：patterns 阶段与本题无关，别把它的调用算进来。
-  assert.equal(ctx2.seen.filter((p) => p.includes("冲突仲裁")).length, 0,
-    "no LLM call is made for a settled pair");
-
-  // 但这不等于「永远不再判」：一侧被改写后必须重新回到候选里。
-  service.update(a.id, { content: "甲端口 的内容被改写" });
-  const ctx3 = captureCtx(reply);
-  const third = await runSleep(ctx3, service, baseConfig({ sleepActionSet: "full" }), ctx3.logger, { embedder, vectorIndex }, null);
-  assert.ok(ctx3.seen.some((p) => p.includes("冲突仲裁")), "an edited pair is re-sent to the model");
-  assert.ok(third.phases.conflicts, "the phase still runs");
-  store.close();
-});
-
-test("issue#533: the audit row reports suppressed separately from 'no conflicts found'", async () => {
-  const { service, store, vectorIndex } = setup();
-  const { a, b } = seedPair(service, vectorIndex, "甲端口", "乙端口");
-  // 先手工记一笔账（正文与相似度都没变），第二轮应报 noop + suppressed。
-  applyDecisions(
-    [{ action: "differentiate", ids: [a.id, b.id], distinctions: ["甲面", "乙面"] }],
-    service, null, snapshotOf(store, service.getById(a.id), service.getById(b.id)), {}
-  );
-  const ctx = captureCtx(JSON.stringify([]));
-  const result = await runSleep(ctx, service, baseConfig({ sleepActionSet: "full" }), ctx.logger, { embedder, vectorIndex }, null);
-  assert.equal(result.phases.conflicts.status, "noop");
-  assert.equal(result.phases.conflicts.reason, "all candidate pairs already differentiated");
-  assert.equal(result.phases.conflicts.suppressed, 1);
-  assert.equal(result.phases.conflicts.pairs, undefined, "no pair is reported as pending work");
-  store.close();
-});
+// Issue #533：differentiate 的正反馈死循环回归护栏。
+//
+// 现象（issue #533 实测）：sleepActionSet="full" 下，一对高相似记忆被判成
+// differentiate，旧实现把**同一段**差异注记同时追加到两侧正文，指望"注记进
+// embedding 后下一轮不再判重复"。离线复现证明恰好相反——两侧共享同一段后缀会让
+// 向量同向靠拢（0.876 → 0.960 只用 5 轮，把注记截到 0 字照样往上爬，因为推高相似
+// 度的是共享前缀本身而不是注记长短），于是下一轮又被判重复、又追加一段，实测单条
+// 堆到 19 段、正文 150 字膨胀到 2200+ 字。
+//
+// 现在的契约：differentiate **不改正文**，裁决落 differentiated_pairs 账本；候选
+// 构造阶段读账本，已裁决且两侧正文未变就不送模型。本文件锁的就是这两件事——
+// 「正文不变」和「第二轮不再花钱」。
+import test from "node:test";
+import assert from "node:assert/strict";
+import { applyDecisions, validateDecisions } from "../src/dream/decisions.js";
+import { createStore } from "../src/store.js";
+import { createService } from "../src/service.js";
+import { createVectorIndex } from "../src/vector-index.js";
+import { runSleep } from "../src/dream/sleep.js";
+
+const embedder = {
+  // 批量接口要按输入条数返回（向量回填走这一条），返回单个向量会让 usable 判空。
+  embedSingle: async () => [1, 0, 0],
+  embed: async (texts) => (Array.isArray(texts) ? texts.map(() => [1, 0, 0]) : [1, 0, 0]),
+  schedule: () => {},
+  modelHash: "mock#1",
+  dimension: 3
+};
+
+function setup() {
+  const store = createStore(":memory:");
+  const service = createService({ store, mirror: null, config: {} });
+  const vectorIndex = createVectorIndex({ store });
+  service.setEmbedder(embedder);
+  service.setVectorIndex(vectorIndex);
+  return { store, service, vectorIndex };
+}
+
+function makeMemory(service, title, content, type = "project") {
+  return service.saveWithDedupe({ type, title, content, importance: 3 }).memory;
+}
+
+function snapshotOf(store, ...mems) {
+  return new Map(mems.map((m) => [m.id, store.getById(m.id)]));
+}
+
+function captureCtx(reply) {
+  const seen = [];
+  return {
+    seen,
+    logger: { warn: () => {}, info: () => {} },
+    agentDefaultModel: { currentSelection: () => ({ provider: "mock", model: "sleep-model" }) },
+    llm: {
+      async *stream(options) {
+        seen.push(options.messages.find((m) => m.system ?? m.role === "system")?.content?.[0]?.text ?? "");
+        yield { type: "text-delta", index: 0, text: typeof reply === "function" ? reply() : reply };
+        yield { type: "finish", reason: { kind: "stop" } };
+      }
+    }
+  };
+}
+
+function baseConfig(overrides = {}) {
+  return {
+    sleepModeEnabled: true,
+    sleepIdleMinutes: 5,
+    sleepMinIntervalHours: 8,
+    sleepConflictStrictness: "normal",
+    sleepArchiveDays: 30,
+    sleepCompressDays: 90,
+    sleepPatternMinMemories: 100,
+    sleepMaxPatternPerRun: 3,
+    ...overrides
+  };
+}
+
+function seedPair(service, vectorIndex, t1, t2, sim = 1.0) {
+  const a = makeMemory(service, t1, `${t1} 的内容`);
+  const b = makeMemory(service, t2, `${t2} 的内容`);
+  const sin = Math.sqrt(Math.max(0, 1 - sim * sim));
+  vectorIndex.saveEmbedding(a.id, [1, 0, 0]);
+  vectorIndex.saveEmbedding(b.id, [sim, sin, 0]);
+  return { a, b };
+}
+
+// ---------------------------------------------------------------- 正文不变
+
+test("issue#533: repeated differentiate with drifting wording never grows the bodies", () => {
+  const { service, store } = setup();
+  const a = makeMemory(service, "内网 SSH 端口", "内网走 22");
+  const b = makeMemory(service, "外网 SSH 端口", "外网映射 2222");
+  const before = { [a.id]: service.getById(a.id).content, [b.id]: service.getById(b.id).content };
+  // 模型每轮换一种说法——这正是字面 includes 幂等失效的场景，也是 issue 里单条堆到
+  // 19 段的真实成因。账本口径下措辞漂移不再产生任何正文副作用。
+  const wordings = [
+    ["内网直连", "外网映射"],
+    ["走内网", "走外网映射"],
+    ["内网那台直连", "外网那台做映射"],
+    ["内网的机器直连", "外网的机器走映射"],
+    ["内网直连（22）", "外网映射（2222）"]
+  ];
+  let appliedRounds = 0;
+  for (const distinctions of wordings) {
+    const snapshot = snapshotOf(store, service.getById(a.id), service.getById(b.id));
+    const { applied } = applyDecisions(
+      [{ action: "differentiate", ids: [a.id, b.id], distinctions }],
+      service, null, snapshot, {}
+    );
+    appliedRounds += applied;
+  }
+  assert.equal(appliedRounds, 1, "only the first round is a real verdict; the rest are idempotent");
+  // 这一条是 #533 的核心断言：无论判多少轮，正文长度一个字节都不许变。
+  assert.equal(service.getById(a.id).content, before[a.id], "side A body is byte-identical");
+  assert.equal(service.getById(b.id).content, before[b.id], "side B body is byte-identical");
+  assert.equal(service.getById(a.id).content.length, "内网走 22".length, "no note accumulates");
+  store.close();
+});
+
+test("issue#533: the ledger keeps one row per pair and refreshes the distinctions", () => {
+  const { service, store } = setup();
+  const a = makeMemory(service, "甲", "内容甲");
+  const b = makeMemory(service, "乙", "内容乙");
+  for (const distinctions of [["第一版"], ["第二版", "补充版"]]) {
+    applyDecisions(
+      [{ action: "differentiate", ids: [a.id, b.id], distinctions }],
+      service, null, snapshotOf(store, service.getById(a.id), service.getById(b.id)), {}
+    );
+  }
+  // 顺序归一：不管送审时谁在前，账本只有一行。
+  assert.equal(store.listDifferentiatedPairs().length, 1, "one pair, one row");
+  const record = service.findDifferentiatedPair(b.id, a.id);
+  assert.deepEqual(record.distinctions, ["第一版"], "an unchanged body keeps the original verdict");
+  store.close();
+});
+
+// -------------------------------------------------------------- 三层幂等
+
+test("issue#533: a body edited after the verdict re-opens the pair", () => {
+  const { service, store } = setup();
+  const a = makeMemory(service, "甲", "内容甲");
+  const b = makeMemory(service, "乙", "内容乙");
+  applyDecisions(
+    [{ action: "differentiate", ids: [a.id, b.id], distinctions: ["甲面", "乙面"] }],
+    service, null, snapshotOf(store, service.getById(a.id), service.getById(b.id)), {}
+  );
+  // 原样重放 → 幂等。
+  const replay = applyDecisions(
+    [{ action: "differentiate", ids: [a.id, b.id], distinctions: ["甲面", "乙面"] }],
+    service, null, snapshotOf(store, service.getById(a.id), service.getById(b.id)), {}
+  );
+  assert.equal(replay.applied, 0, "an unchanged pair is idempotent");
+  // 一侧被改写 → 结论可能不再成立，必须能重新裁决（宁可再判一次，不静音真的演化）。
+  service.update(a.id, { content: "内容甲被改写" });
+  const reopened = applyDecisions(
+    [{ action: "differentiate", ids: [a.id, b.id], distinctions: ["甲面", "乙面", "改写后"] }],
+    service, null, snapshotOf(store, service.getById(a.id), service.getById(b.id)), {}
+  );
+  assert.equal(reopened.applied, 1, "an edited side re-opens the pair");
+  assert.deepEqual(
+    service.findDifferentiatedPair(a.id, b.id).distinctions, ["甲面", "乙面", "改写后"],
+    "the refreshed verdict replaces the stale one"
+  );
+  store.close();
+});
+
+test("issue#533: legacy rows that still carry the old note are treated as adjudicated", () => {
+  const { service, store } = setup();
+  // 旧版本写进正文的注记块原样造出来（升级不清账：这些行没有账本行）。
+  const a = makeMemory(service, "甲", "内容甲\n\n（差异注记：甲面；乙面）");
+  const b = makeMemory(service, "乙", "内容乙\n\n（差异注记：甲面；乙面）");
+  const { applied } = applyDecisions(
+    [{ action: "differentiate", ids: [a.id, b.id], distinctions: ["甲面", "乙面"] }],
+    service, null, snapshotOf(store, service.getById(a.id), service.getById(b.id)), {}
+  );
+  assert.equal(applied, 0, "no ledger row is needed once both sides carry the note");
+  assert.equal(service.getById(a.id).content, "内容甲\n\n（差异注记：甲面；乙面）", "the legacy body is untouched");
+  store.close();
+});
+
+test("issue#533: a bare service without the ledger degrades to skipped, never throws", () => {
+  // 人工确认路径（service.js 的裸 applyService）没有账本透传——此时「正文不变」本身
+  // 就是全部副作用，没有账本就没有可写之处，只能是 skipped，不能算 applied。
+  const mems = new Map();
+  const bare = {
+    getById: (id) => mems.get(id) ?? null,
+    update: (id, patch) => { mems.set(id, { ...mems.get(id), ...patch }); },
+    setArchived: () => {},
+    transaction: (fn) => fn()
+  };
+  mems.set("a", { id: "a", title: "甲", content: "内容甲", archived: false });
+  mems.set("b", { id: "b", title: "乙", content: "内容乙", archived: false });
+  const { applied, failures } = applyDecisions(
+    [{ action: "differentiate", ids: ["a", "b"], distinctions: ["甲面", "乙面"] }],
+    bare, null, null, {}
+  );
+  assert.equal(applied, 0, "nothing to record, nothing applied");
+  assert.equal(failures.length, 0, "degrades cleanly");
+  assert.equal(mems.get("a").content, "内容甲", "still never touches the body");
+});
+
+// ------------------------------------------------------- 候选构造阶段抑制
+
+test("issue#533: a second sleep cycle does not pay for an already-adjudicated pair", async () => {
+  const { service, store, vectorIndex } = setup();
+  const { a, b } = seedPair(service, vectorIndex, "甲端口", "乙端口");
+  const reply = () => JSON.stringify([
+    { action: "differentiate", ids: [a.id, b.id], distinctions: ["甲面", "乙面"] }
+  ]);
+  const ctx1 = captureCtx(reply);
+  const first = await runSleep(ctx1, service, baseConfig({ sleepActionSet: "full" }), ctx1.logger, { embedder, vectorIndex }, null);
+  assert.equal(first.phases.conflicts.applied, 1, "the first cycle adjudicates the pair");
+  const callsAfterFirst = ctx1.seen.length;
+  assert.ok(service.findDifferentiatedPair(a.id, b.id), "the verdict landed in the ledger");
+
+  // 第二轮：同一对、同一相似度，账本命中且两侧正文未变 → 候选在送 LLM 之前就被压掉。
+  const ctx2 = captureCtx(reply);
+  const second = await runSleep(ctx2, service, baseConfig({ sleepActionSet: "full" }), ctx2.logger, { embedder, vectorIndex }, null);
+  assert.equal(second.phases.conflicts.status, "noop", "the phase has nothing left to adjudicate");
+  assert.equal(second.phases.conflicts.suppressed, 1, "the pair is accounted for, not silently dropped");
+  // 只数冲突阶段那次调用：patterns 阶段与本题无关，别把它的调用算进来。
+  assert.equal(ctx2.seen.filter((p) => p.includes("冲突仲裁")).length, 0,
+    "no LLM call is made for a settled pair");
+
+  // 但这不等于「永远不再判」：一侧被改写后必须重新回到候选里。
+  service.update(a.id, { content: "甲端口 的内容被改写" });
+  const ctx3 = captureCtx(reply);
+  const third = await runSleep(ctx3, service, baseConfig({ sleepActionSet: "full" }), ctx3.logger, { embedder, vectorIndex }, null);
+  assert.ok(ctx3.seen.some((p) => p.includes("冲突仲裁")), "an edited pair is re-sent to the model");
+  assert.ok(third.phases.conflicts, "the phase still runs");
+  store.close();
+});
+
+test("issue#533: the audit row reports suppressed separately from 'no conflicts found'", async () => {
+  const { service, store, vectorIndex } = setup();
+  const { a, b } = seedPair(service, vectorIndex, "甲端口", "乙端口");
+  // 先手工记一笔账（正文与相似度都没变），第二轮应报 noop + suppressed。
+  applyDecisions(
+    [{ action: "differentiate", ids: [a.id, b.id], distinctions: ["甲面", "乙面"] }],
+    service, null, snapshotOf(store, service.getById(a.id), service.getById(b.id)), {}
+  );
+  const ctx = captureCtx(JSON.stringify([]));
+  const result = await runSleep(ctx, service, baseConfig({ sleepActionSet: "full" }), ctx.logger, { embedder, vectorIndex }, null);
+  assert.equal(result.phases.conflicts.status, "noop");
+  assert.equal(result.phases.conflicts.reason, "all candidate pairs already differentiated");
+  assert.equal(result.phases.conflicts.suppressed, 1);
+  assert.equal(result.phases.conflicts.pairs, undefined, "no pair is reported as pending work");
+  store.close();
+});