@minniexcode/codex-switch 0.0.4 → 0.0.6
This diff represents the content of publicly available package versions that have been released to one of the supported registries. The information contained in this diff is provided for informational purposes only and reflects changes between package versions as they appear in their respective public registries.
- package/README.md +35 -97
- package/dist/app/add-provider.js +40 -3
- package/dist/app/edit-provider.js +76 -3
- package/dist/app/export-providers.js +2 -2
- package/dist/app/get-current-profile.js +1 -1
- package/dist/app/get-status.js +10 -3
- package/dist/app/import-providers.js +47 -3
- package/dist/app/list-backups.js +1 -1
- package/dist/app/list-config-profiles.js +30 -0
- package/dist/app/list-providers.js +1 -1
- package/dist/app/remove-provider.js +35 -3
- package/dist/app/rollback-backup.js +1 -1
- package/dist/app/rollback-latest.js +1 -1
- package/dist/app/run-doctor.js +44 -26
- package/dist/app/run-mutation.js +2 -2
- package/dist/app/setup-codex.js +37 -20
- package/dist/app/show-config.js +34 -0
- package/dist/app/show-provider.js +1 -1
- package/dist/app/switch-provider.js +8 -5
- package/dist/cli/add-interactive.js +7 -106
- package/dist/cli/args.js +5 -126
- package/dist/cli/help.js +5 -276
- package/dist/cli/interactive.js +16 -171
- package/dist/cli/output.js +23 -1
- package/dist/cli/prompt.js +3 -108
- package/dist/cli.js +10 -315
- package/dist/commands/args.js +132 -0
- package/dist/commands/dispatch.js +16 -0
- package/dist/commands/handlers.js +391 -0
- package/dist/commands/help.js +119 -0
- package/dist/commands/registry.js +291 -0
- package/dist/commands/types.js +2 -0
- package/dist/domain/config.js +548 -39
- package/dist/infra/backup-repo.js +8 -208
- package/dist/infra/codex-cli.js +8 -113
- package/dist/infra/codex-discovery.js +3 -41
- package/dist/infra/codex-paths.js +5 -69
- package/dist/infra/config-repo.js +161 -9
- package/dist/infra/fs-utils.js +7 -95
- package/dist/infra/lock-repo.js +3 -97
- package/dist/infra/providers-repo.js +7 -96
- package/dist/interaction/add-interactive.js +108 -0
- package/dist/interaction/interactive.js +216 -0
- package/dist/interaction/prompt.js +110 -0
- package/dist/runtime/codex-cli.js +130 -0
- package/dist/runtime/codex-probe.js +50 -0
- package/dist/runtime/types.js +2 -0
- package/dist/storage/backup-repo.js +210 -0
- package/dist/storage/codex-paths.js +71 -0
- package/dist/storage/config-repo.js +208 -0
- package/dist/storage/fs-utils.js +97 -0
- package/dist/storage/lock-repo.js +99 -0
- package/dist/storage/providers-repo.js +98 -0
- package/docs/Design/codex-switch-v0.0.5-design.md +932 -0
- package/docs/Design/codex-switch-v0.0.6-design.md +708 -0
- package/docs/PRD/codex-switch-prd-v0.0.5-to-v0.1.0.md +340 -0
- package/docs/PRD/codex-switch-prd-v0.1.0.md +215 -291
- package/docs/PRD/codex-switch-prd.md +1 -1
- package/docs/cli-usage.md +2 -1
- package/docs/codex-switch-technical-architecture.md +73 -4
- package/docs/test-report-0.0.5.md +163 -0
- package/docs/testing.md +131 -0
- package/package.json +1 -1
- /package/docs/{codex-switch-v0.0.4-design.md → Design/codex-switch-v0.0.4-design.md} +0 -0
|
@@ -130,6 +130,13 @@ Infrastructure 层
|
|
|
130
130
|
|
|
131
131
|
这意味着未来即使引入 GUI / MCP / HTTP 适配层,核心同步目标仍然是 runtime files,而不是把 runtime files 本身当成长期管理数据库。
|
|
132
132
|
|
|
133
|
+
`0.0.6` 的实现边界还需要区分“逻辑主层”和“兼容层”:
|
|
134
|
+
|
|
135
|
+
- 逻辑主层已经迁移到 `src/commands/`、`src/interaction/`、`src/storage/`、`src/runtime/`
|
|
136
|
+
- `src/cli/` 和 `src/infra/` 当前主要承担兼容 re-export 与入口收敛职责
|
|
137
|
+
- 这意味着 `0.0.6` 的完成标准是“边界和契约已经统一”,而不是“所有旧路径文件都物理删除”
|
|
138
|
+
- 后续版本可以在兼容窗口结束后继续删除旧 facade,但这不属于 `0.0.6` 的必须交付范围
|
|
139
|
+
|
|
133
140
|
### 3.3 模块依赖图
|
|
134
141
|
|
|
135
142
|
当前代码依赖关系可以抽象为:
|
|
@@ -194,10 +201,14 @@ argv
|
|
|
194
201
|
```text
|
|
195
202
|
src/
|
|
196
203
|
cli.ts
|
|
204
|
+
commands/
|
|
205
|
+
interaction/
|
|
197
206
|
app/
|
|
198
207
|
cli/
|
|
199
208
|
domain/
|
|
209
|
+
runtime/
|
|
200
210
|
infra/
|
|
211
|
+
storage/
|
|
201
212
|
|
|
202
213
|
tests/
|
|
203
214
|
app.spec.js
|
|
@@ -220,7 +231,65 @@ scripts/
|
|
|
220
231
|
|
|
221
232
|
它不直接做文件读写,不直接写业务逻辑,也不直接实现备份或校验规则。
|
|
222
233
|
|
|
223
|
-
### 4.2 `src/
|
|
234
|
+
### 4.2 `src/commands/`
|
|
235
|
+
|
|
236
|
+
这一层是 `0.0.6` 新增的命令表面层,负责把“公开 CLI 形态”收敛为单一 registry。
|
|
237
|
+
|
|
238
|
+
它承担的职责是:
|
|
239
|
+
|
|
240
|
+
- 定义每个命令的公开 token 形态,例如 `config show`、`config list-profiles`、`backups list`
|
|
241
|
+
- 统一保存 `summary`、`usage`、`details`、`examples`
|
|
242
|
+
- 绑定 command handler,供 dispatch 直接执行
|
|
243
|
+
- 让 help、解析和 dispatch 共享同一份事实源
|
|
244
|
+
|
|
245
|
+
它不负责:
|
|
246
|
+
|
|
247
|
+
- 具体文件读写
|
|
248
|
+
- prompt 交互细节
|
|
249
|
+
- human output 渲染
|
|
250
|
+
|
|
251
|
+
### 4.3 `src/interaction/`
|
|
252
|
+
|
|
253
|
+
这一层是 `0.0.6` 中显式抽出的交互层,负责所有 CLI 级 prompt 组合逻辑。
|
|
254
|
+
|
|
255
|
+
它承担的职责是:
|
|
256
|
+
|
|
257
|
+
- 判断哪些路径允许交互
|
|
258
|
+
- 组合 provider 选择、确认、rollback 预览等交互动作
|
|
259
|
+
- 组织 add/edit/setup 中的渐进式输入收集
|
|
260
|
+
|
|
261
|
+
它不负责:
|
|
262
|
+
|
|
263
|
+
- 业务状态变更
|
|
264
|
+
- 文件系统写入
|
|
265
|
+
- 运行时探测
|
|
266
|
+
|
|
267
|
+
`setup` 是这一层边界最强的命令之一。在 `0.0.6` 中,它的 adopt profile 选择和 provider 详情输入仍然是交互式 contract,因此非交互路径会显式失败,而不是隐式进入空输入分支。
|
|
268
|
+
|
|
269
|
+
### 4.4 `src/storage/`
|
|
270
|
+
|
|
271
|
+
这一层是 `0.0.6` 的文件和状态访问层,负责把以前分散在 `infra/` 的能力收口成稳定存储边界。
|
|
272
|
+
|
|
273
|
+
它承担的职责是:
|
|
274
|
+
|
|
275
|
+
- `config.toml` / `providers.json` / backup manifest / lock file 的读写
|
|
276
|
+
- Codex home 目录路径展开
|
|
277
|
+
- 原子写入、备份、回滚、锁定
|
|
278
|
+
|
|
279
|
+
`src/infra/` 在当前版本主要保留兼容 re-export,以便逐步迁移,不再作为新的业务入口继续扩张。
|
|
280
|
+
|
|
281
|
+
### 4.5 `src/runtime/`
|
|
282
|
+
|
|
283
|
+
这一层是 `0.0.6` 新增的运行时边界,负责本地 Codex CLI 的外部依赖探测和登录调用。
|
|
284
|
+
|
|
285
|
+
它承担的职责是:
|
|
286
|
+
|
|
287
|
+
- Codex 可用性检查
|
|
288
|
+
- Codex 版本检查
|
|
289
|
+
- Codex login 调用
|
|
290
|
+
- 未来可扩展为第三方 runtime adapter 的能力边界
|
|
291
|
+
|
|
292
|
+
### 4.6 `src/cli/`
|
|
224
293
|
|
|
225
294
|
#### `src/cli/args.ts`
|
|
226
295
|
|
|
@@ -272,7 +341,7 @@ scripts/
|
|
|
272
341
|
|
|
273
342
|
这两个纯渲染入口的作用是让 CLI 层本身也能被测试,而不依赖真实子进程。
|
|
274
343
|
|
|
275
|
-
### 4.
|
|
344
|
+
### 4.7 `src/app/`
|
|
276
345
|
|
|
277
346
|
这一层是应用服务 / 用例编排层。每个文件基本对应一个命令或一个用例:
|
|
278
347
|
|
|
@@ -301,7 +370,7 @@ scripts/
|
|
|
301
370
|
- `stdout` / `stderr` 怎么写
|
|
302
371
|
- argv 怎么解析
|
|
303
372
|
|
|
304
|
-
### 4.
|
|
373
|
+
### 4.8 `src/domain/`
|
|
305
374
|
|
|
306
375
|
#### `errors.ts`
|
|
307
376
|
|
|
@@ -463,7 +532,7 @@ scripts/
|
|
|
463
532
|
- 用于 `codex login --with-api-key`
|
|
464
533
|
- `baseUrl`
|
|
465
534
|
- 选填
|
|
466
|
-
-
|
|
535
|
+
- 当前版本只存储在 `providers.json`;`config show` 中展示的 runtime `baseUrl` 由 `model_provider -> model_providers.*.base_url` 解析
|
|
467
536
|
- `note`
|
|
468
537
|
- 选填
|
|
469
538
|
- 面向人类和 AI 的说明字段
|
|
@@ -0,0 +1,163 @@
|
|
|
1
|
+
# Test Report: 0.0.5
|
|
2
|
+
|
|
3
|
+
Date: 2026-05-13
|
|
4
|
+
|
|
5
|
+
## Environment
|
|
6
|
+
|
|
7
|
+
- Platform: Windows (`win32`)
|
|
8
|
+
- Node.js: `v24.11.1`
|
|
9
|
+
- npm: `11.13.0`
|
|
10
|
+
- Workspace: `C:\Users\A200477427\Developers\Github\codex-switch`
|
|
11
|
+
|
|
12
|
+
## Commands Run
|
|
13
|
+
|
|
14
|
+
```bash
|
|
15
|
+
npm run build
|
|
16
|
+
npm test
|
|
17
|
+
```
|
|
18
|
+
|
|
19
|
+
## Overall Result
|
|
20
|
+
|
|
21
|
+
- Build: PASS
|
|
22
|
+
- Test suites: 5/5 PASS
|
|
23
|
+
|
|
24
|
+
Suite results:
|
|
25
|
+
|
|
26
|
+
- `domain`: PASS
|
|
27
|
+
- `app`: PASS
|
|
28
|
+
- `cli`: PASS
|
|
29
|
+
- `dev-sandbox`: PASS
|
|
30
|
+
- `e2e`: PASS
|
|
31
|
+
|
|
32
|
+
## Coverage Added In This Pass
|
|
33
|
+
|
|
34
|
+
New test assets:
|
|
35
|
+
|
|
36
|
+
- `tests/dev-sandbox.spec.js`
|
|
37
|
+
- `tests/e2e.spec.js`
|
|
38
|
+
- `docs/testing.md`
|
|
39
|
+
|
|
40
|
+
Updated wiring:
|
|
41
|
+
|
|
42
|
+
- `tests/helpers.js`
|
|
43
|
+
- `tests/run-tests.js`
|
|
44
|
+
|
|
45
|
+
## Detailed Results
|
|
46
|
+
|
|
47
|
+
### 1. Domain Suite
|
|
48
|
+
|
|
49
|
+
Status: PASS
|
|
50
|
+
|
|
51
|
+
Focus:
|
|
52
|
+
|
|
53
|
+
- config patch planning
|
|
54
|
+
- managed profile view generation
|
|
55
|
+
- provider normalization and masking
|
|
56
|
+
- runtime drift helpers
|
|
57
|
+
- backup list helpers
|
|
58
|
+
|
|
59
|
+
### 2. App Suite
|
|
60
|
+
|
|
61
|
+
Status: PASS
|
|
62
|
+
|
|
63
|
+
Focus:
|
|
64
|
+
|
|
65
|
+
- list/current/status
|
|
66
|
+
- add/edit/show/remove
|
|
67
|
+
- import/export
|
|
68
|
+
- switch/login/rollback
|
|
69
|
+
- setup
|
|
70
|
+
- doctor
|
|
71
|
+
- lock conflict and rollback behavior
|
|
72
|
+
|
|
73
|
+
### 3. CLI Suite
|
|
74
|
+
|
|
75
|
+
Status: PASS
|
|
76
|
+
|
|
77
|
+
Focus:
|
|
78
|
+
|
|
79
|
+
- arg parsing
|
|
80
|
+
- help rendering
|
|
81
|
+
- JSON success/failure envelopes
|
|
82
|
+
- interactive add/edit/remove/import/export/rollback/setup flows
|
|
83
|
+
- config commands
|
|
84
|
+
|
|
85
|
+
### 4. Dev Sandbox Suite
|
|
86
|
+
|
|
87
|
+
Status: PASS
|
|
88
|
+
|
|
89
|
+
Fixture:
|
|
90
|
+
|
|
91
|
+
- `dev-codex/local-sandbox`
|
|
92
|
+
|
|
93
|
+
Validated with the built CLI command dispatcher against the real development fixture:
|
|
94
|
+
|
|
95
|
+
- `list --json`
|
|
96
|
+
- `current --json`
|
|
97
|
+
- `status --json`
|
|
98
|
+
- `config show --json`
|
|
99
|
+
- `backups list --json`
|
|
100
|
+
- `doctor --json`
|
|
101
|
+
|
|
102
|
+
Observed state during test:
|
|
103
|
+
|
|
104
|
+
- active profile: `packycode`
|
|
105
|
+
- managed providers: `freemodel`, `packycode`
|
|
106
|
+
- status issues: `0`
|
|
107
|
+
- backups found: `>= 1`
|
|
108
|
+
|
|
109
|
+
### 5. End-to-End Suite
|
|
110
|
+
|
|
111
|
+
Status: PASS
|
|
112
|
+
|
|
113
|
+
Fixture strategy:
|
|
114
|
+
|
|
115
|
+
- copy `dev-codex/local-sandbox` into a temp directory
|
|
116
|
+
- run write commands against the temp copy
|
|
117
|
+
- keep the repository fixture unchanged
|
|
118
|
+
|
|
119
|
+
Validated flows:
|
|
120
|
+
|
|
121
|
+
- `switch freemodel` updates active profile and refreshes `auth.json`
|
|
122
|
+
- `rollback` restores `config.toml` and `auth.json`
|
|
123
|
+
- `add` creates a provider in `providers.json`
|
|
124
|
+
- `edit` updates note and tags
|
|
125
|
+
- `remove --force` deletes a non-active provider
|
|
126
|
+
- `add --create-profile` creates a managed profile section in `config.toml` when a same-named `[model_providers.*]` runtime section already exists
|
|
127
|
+
- destructive removal of the active provider fails with `PROFILE_IN_USE`
|
|
128
|
+
- `import --merge` replaces overlapping providers and keeps merged state valid
|
|
129
|
+
- `export` writes a valid providers file
|
|
130
|
+
- `backups list` skips corrupt backup folders with warnings
|
|
131
|
+
- `rollback missing-backup` fails with `BACKUP_NOT_FOUND`
|
|
132
|
+
- corrupt `backups/latest.json` fails with `ROLLBACK_FAILED`
|
|
133
|
+
- `setup` adopt flow works through CLI dispatch with mocked Codex CLI availability
|
|
134
|
+
|
|
135
|
+
Validated mixed workflows:
|
|
136
|
+
|
|
137
|
+
- `add -> switch -> edit -> show -> config show -> export -> rollback`
|
|
138
|
+
- `import --merge -> switch --no-login -> remove -> doctor -> backups list -> rollback <backup-id>`
|
|
139
|
+
|
|
140
|
+
## Release Confidence
|
|
141
|
+
|
|
142
|
+
Current confidence for `0.0.5`: medium-high.
|
|
143
|
+
|
|
144
|
+
Why:
|
|
145
|
+
|
|
146
|
+
- core read and write workflows now have automated coverage
|
|
147
|
+
- the development fixture is exercised directly by the built CLI
|
|
148
|
+
- backup/rollback behavior is covered by both existing and new tests
|
|
149
|
+
|
|
150
|
+
## Residual Risks
|
|
151
|
+
|
|
152
|
+
- `setup` is not yet covered as a true subprocess end-to-end command because it depends on interactive adopt input and external `codex` availability
|
|
153
|
+
- `rollback-latest` still has no direct dedicated test case even though `rollback` coverage is strong
|
|
154
|
+
- `README.md` still shows version `0.0.4` in the documentation text and should be updated separately
|
|
155
|
+
|
|
156
|
+
## Recommended Pre-Release Checklist
|
|
157
|
+
|
|
158
|
+
Before the next publish:
|
|
159
|
+
|
|
160
|
+
- run `npm test`
|
|
161
|
+
- run a manual smoke check of `node dist/cli.js --help`
|
|
162
|
+
- run one real local `switch --no-login` against a temp `--codex-dir`
|
|
163
|
+
- update user-facing docs if the package version changes
|
package/docs/testing.md
ADDED
|
@@ -0,0 +1,131 @@
|
|
|
1
|
+
# Testing Guide
|
|
2
|
+
|
|
3
|
+
`codex-switch` now has four test layers:
|
|
4
|
+
|
|
5
|
+
- `tests/domain.spec.js`: pure domain/unit coverage
|
|
6
|
+
- `tests/app.spec.js`: file-backed application integration coverage
|
|
7
|
+
- `tests/cli.spec.js`: CLI dispatch and prompt simulation coverage
|
|
8
|
+
- `tests/dev-sandbox.spec.js`: real `node dist/cli.js` read-only smoke tests against `dev-codex/local-sandbox`
|
|
9
|
+
- `tests/e2e.spec.js`: write-command regression tests against temporary copies of `dev-codex/local-sandbox`
|
|
10
|
+
|
|
11
|
+
## Commands
|
|
12
|
+
|
|
13
|
+
Build the CLI:
|
|
14
|
+
|
|
15
|
+
```bash
|
|
16
|
+
npm run build
|
|
17
|
+
```
|
|
18
|
+
|
|
19
|
+
Run the full suite:
|
|
20
|
+
|
|
21
|
+
```bash
|
|
22
|
+
npm test
|
|
23
|
+
```
|
|
24
|
+
|
|
25
|
+
Run a single suite manually:
|
|
26
|
+
|
|
27
|
+
```bash
|
|
28
|
+
node -e "require('./tests/dev-sandbox.spec').run()"
|
|
29
|
+
node -e "require('./tests/e2e.spec').run()"
|
|
30
|
+
```
|
|
31
|
+
|
|
32
|
+
## Development Fixture
|
|
33
|
+
|
|
34
|
+
The repository fixture lives at:
|
|
35
|
+
|
|
36
|
+
```text
|
|
37
|
+
dev-codex/local-sandbox/
|
|
38
|
+
```
|
|
39
|
+
|
|
40
|
+
It is used in two different ways:
|
|
41
|
+
|
|
42
|
+
- read-only dispatcher tests point at it directly
|
|
43
|
+
- mutation tests copy it into a temporary directory before running writes
|
|
44
|
+
|
|
45
|
+
Do not point destructive automation directly at `dev-codex/local-sandbox` unless you intentionally want to update the fixture.
|
|
46
|
+
|
|
47
|
+
## Read-Only Smoke Tests
|
|
48
|
+
|
|
49
|
+
`tests/dev-sandbox.spec.js` verifies the built CLI against the real development fixture.
|
|
50
|
+
|
|
51
|
+
Covered commands:
|
|
52
|
+
|
|
53
|
+
- `list --json`
|
|
54
|
+
- `current --json`
|
|
55
|
+
- `status --json`
|
|
56
|
+
- `config show --json`
|
|
57
|
+
- `backups list --json`
|
|
58
|
+
- `doctor --json`
|
|
59
|
+
|
|
60
|
+
These tests check two execution styles:
|
|
61
|
+
|
|
62
|
+
- development default resolution with `NODE_ENV=development`
|
|
63
|
+
- explicit `--codex-dir dev-codex/local-sandbox`
|
|
64
|
+
|
|
65
|
+
This is the fastest way to validate that `0.0.x` builds still read the repo sandbox correctly.
|
|
66
|
+
|
|
67
|
+
## Mutation Regression Tests
|
|
68
|
+
|
|
69
|
+
`tests/e2e.spec.js` uses `fs.cpSync()` to clone `dev-codex/local-sandbox` into a temp directory, then exercises the real CLI command dispatcher against the copy.
|
|
70
|
+
|
|
71
|
+
Covered write scenarios:
|
|
72
|
+
|
|
73
|
+
- `switch` with login and backup creation
|
|
74
|
+
- `rollback` restoring `config.toml` and `auth.json`
|
|
75
|
+
- `add`, `edit`, `remove`
|
|
76
|
+
- `add --create-profile`
|
|
77
|
+
- blocking destructive remove of the active profile provider
|
|
78
|
+
- `import --merge`
|
|
79
|
+
- `export`
|
|
80
|
+
- `backups list` with corrupt backup entries
|
|
81
|
+
- `rollback <missing-id>`
|
|
82
|
+
- corrupt `backups/latest.json`
|
|
83
|
+
|
|
84
|
+
It also includes mixed workflow scenarios where multiple commands operate on the same sandbox copy end-to-end, for example:
|
|
85
|
+
|
|
86
|
+
- `add -> switch -> edit -> show -> config show -> export -> rollback`
|
|
87
|
+
- `import --merge -> switch --no-login -> remove -> doctor -> backups list -> rollback <backup-id>`
|
|
88
|
+
|
|
89
|
+
The setup flow is covered with `executeCommand()` plus mocked Codex CLI checks because `setup` currently depends on external `codex --version` availability and interactive adopt input.
|
|
90
|
+
|
|
91
|
+
## Fixture Rules
|
|
92
|
+
|
|
93
|
+
- Prefer `--codex-dir <temp-copy>` for all write tests.
|
|
94
|
+
- Prefer `--json` when assertions need stable output.
|
|
95
|
+
- Treat `show --json` output as sensitive because it includes unmasked API keys.
|
|
96
|
+
- If a test needs `codex login` or `codex --version`, prefer mocking the spawn layer.
|
|
97
|
+
- Keep fixture assertions focused on stable data such as provider names, active profile, backup count, and typed error codes.
|
|
98
|
+
|
|
99
|
+
## Reporting Template
|
|
100
|
+
|
|
101
|
+
Use this template for release checks:
|
|
102
|
+
|
|
103
|
+
```text
|
|
104
|
+
Version under test: 0.0.x
|
|
105
|
+
Build: PASS/FAIL
|
|
106
|
+
Suite results:
|
|
107
|
+
- domain: PASS/FAIL
|
|
108
|
+
- app: PASS/FAIL
|
|
109
|
+
- cli: PASS/FAIL
|
|
110
|
+
- dev-sandbox: PASS/FAIL
|
|
111
|
+
- e2e: PASS/FAIL
|
|
112
|
+
|
|
113
|
+
Read-only smoke checks:
|
|
114
|
+
- list/current/status/config/backups/doctor
|
|
115
|
+
|
|
116
|
+
Mutation checks:
|
|
117
|
+
- switch/rollback/add/edit/remove/import/export/setup
|
|
118
|
+
|
|
119
|
+
Open risks:
|
|
120
|
+
- <risk 1>
|
|
121
|
+
- <risk 2>
|
|
122
|
+
```
|
|
123
|
+
|
|
124
|
+
## Current Gaps
|
|
125
|
+
|
|
126
|
+
Known areas that still deserve more coverage:
|
|
127
|
+
|
|
128
|
+
- true subprocess coverage for `setup`
|
|
129
|
+
- explicit tests for `rollback-latest`
|
|
130
|
+
- more backup corruption cases inside historical manifests
|
|
131
|
+
- README and release docs should stay in sync with the package version
|
package/package.json
CHANGED
|
File without changes
|