@mindstudio-ai/remy 0.1.204 → 0.1.206

package/dist/headless.js

@@ -6894,7 +6894,11 @@ async function runTurn(params) {
             });
             break;
           case "error":
-            onEvent({ type: "error", error: friendlyError(event.error) });
+            onEvent({
+              type: "error",
+              error: friendlyError(event.error),
+              ...event.code ? { code: event.code } : {}
+            });
             return;
         }
       }
@@ -7873,7 +7877,11 @@ var HeadlessSession = class {
         );
         return;
       case "error":
-        this.emit("error", { error: e.error }, rid);
+        this.emit(
+          "error",
+          { error: e.error, ...e.code ? { code: e.code } : {} },
+          rid
+        );
         return;
     }
   };

package/dist/index.js

@@ -7569,7 +7569,11 @@ async function runTurn(params) {
             });
             break;
           case "error":
-            onEvent({ type: "error", error: friendlyError(event.error) });
+            onEvent({
+              type: "error",
+              error: friendlyError(event.error),
+              ...event.code ? { code: event.code } : {}
+            });
             return;
         }
       }
@@ -8699,7 +8703,11 @@ var init_headless = __esm({
             );
             return;
           case "error":
-            this.emit("error", { error: e.error }, rid);
+            this.emit(
+              "error",
+              { error: e.error, ...e.code ? { code: e.code } : {} },
+              rid
+            );
             return;
         }
       };

package/dist/subagents/copyEditor/prompt.md

@@ -42,11 +42,13 @@ The opposite failure is bleaching copy into flat, choppy, personality-free mush
 
 ## How to respond
 
-Before you hand anything back, read it cold, as someone seeing it for the first time: can you scan it once and get the point? Does every line connect and say something real? If not, it isn't done.
+Before you hand anything back, read it cold, as someone seeing it for the first time: can you scan it once and get the point? Does every line connect and say something real? Or is it a bunch of hot air, and you walk away feeling like you obviously just read something but actually have no idea if it said anything meaningful or substanatial at all?
 
-Return the rewritten copy, ready to drop in. Then one line on what you changed and why ("Led with the outcome, cut two filler sentences, swapped 'leverage' → 'use'").
+Think about what the purpose of the text is - what it's trying to communicate, who it's speaking to, why it exists to begin with - and think about what would make it more clear, impactful, and effective in its purpose.
 
-If it's already strong, say so and return it as-is — don't edit for the sake of editing. If you were given several distinct strings, return them in the same structure you received, so they're easy to place back.
+Start by writing a brief blurb about your thinking on these points, and the goal/intention of the edits that follow.
+
+Then, write your edits. You can either return the fully rewritten copy, or, if it's a long piece of prose, targeted edits where necessary.
 
 <voice>
 A great writer with a sharp editor's eye. You can make ordinary copy land, and you can spot generated writing in one read. You change how something is said freely; you never change what's true.

package/package.json

@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
 {
   "name": "@mindstudio-ai/remy",
-  "version": "0.1.204",
+  "version": "0.1.206",
   "description": "Remy coding agent",
   "repository": {
     "type": "git",