@meridiona/meridian-darwin-arm64 1.0.0

package/services/tests/evals/data/seeds/sessions_b_generic.json

@@ -0,0 +1,1319 @@
+{
+  "sessions": [
+    {
+      "id": 1,
+      "app_name": "Google Chrome",
+      "started_at": "2026-05-27T09:02:15+05:30",
+      "ended_at": "2026-05-27T09:09:35+05:30",
+      "duration_s": 440,
+      "category": "planning",
+      "confidence": 0.97,
+      "session_text_source": "ocr",
+      "window_titles": [
+        {
+          "window_name": "Linear -- Zuno team workspace",
+          "count": 10
+        },
+        {
+          "window_name": "GitHub -- notifications",
+          "count": 2
+        },
+        {
+          "window_name": "Gmail -- inbox",
+          "count": 2
+        }
+      ],
+      "session_text": "[09:02:15]\nGoogle Chrome\nLinear -- Zuno team workspace  https://linear.app/zuno\nBrowser tabs:\n  (1) Linear -- My Issues  <- ACTIVE\n  (2) Gmail (unread: 3)\n  (3) Slack (unread: 12)\n  (4) GitHub  (notifications: 4)\n\nLinear left sidebar:\n  Zuno workspace\n  Inbox  (8 unread)\n  My Issues  <- selected\n  All Issues\n  Projects:\n    Backend  (24 open issues)\n    Frontend (18 open issues)\n    Infra (7 open issues)\n    Design (6 open issues)\n  Cycles:\n    May Sprint 2026 (current)\n  Views:\n    Board view\n    My Issues (list)\n    Active  <- last used\n  Members:\n    Zoe Dev (me)\n    Sarah Chen\n    Alex Rodriguez\n    John Smith\n    4 more\n\nTop filter bar:\n  Assignee = @me\n  Status != Done\n  Due Date within 14 days\n  Sort: Due date ascending\n  View: List view  |  Group by: None\n\n============================================================\nMY ISSUES  (6 matching)\n============================================================\n\n[PROJ-210]  🔴 HIGH  ⚠ Due: 2026-05-28  (TOMORROW)\nMigrate auth from JWT to session cookies\n  Status:    In Progress\n  Assignee:  @me (Zoe Dev)\n  Estimate:  13 points\n  Cycle:     May Sprint 2026\n  Labels:    auth, security, full-stack, breaking-change\n  Team:      Backend + Frontend\n  Updated:   2026-05-25 07:45\n  Comments:  5  (3 new since last viewed)\n  Subtasks:  0/0\n  > Last comment (Alex Rodriguez, 07:12 today):\n    'Sounds solid! One thing to note on the frontend: cookies need CSRF\n     protection that JWT didn't require. Since we're using cookies, we need\n     to: 1. Fetch CSRF token from GET /auth/csrf-token on app load...'\n\n[PROJ-201]  🔴 HIGH  Due: 2026-05-30  (3 days)\nImplement webhook retry logic with exponential backoff\n  Status:    In Progress\n  Assignee:  @me (Zoe Dev)\n  Estimate:  8 points\n  Cycle:     May Sprint 2026\n  Labels:    backend, webhook, reliability, observability\n  Team:      Backend\n  Updated:   2026-05-25 10:05\n  Comments:  4  (1 new)\n  Subtasks:  3/5  (60%)\n  ✓ Design retry queue schema\n  ✓ Create webhook event TypeScript model\n  ✓ Implement exponential backoff timer\n  ◯ Write integration test suite\n  ◯ Add Datadog/observability integration\n  > Last comment (Engineering Lead, 09:11 yesterday):\n    'Good progress! A few things to think about: 1) Circuit breaker pattern:\n     if a webhook target is permanently dead (3+ consecutive failures)...'\n\n[PROJ-225]  🟡 MEDIUM  Due: 2026-06-02  (6 days)\nDashboard performance: lazy-load heavy chart components\n  Status:    In Progress\n  Assignee:  @me (Zoe Dev)\n  Estimate:  5 points\n  Cycle:     May Sprint 2026\n  Labels:    frontend, performance, react, dashboard\n  Team:      Frontend\n  Updated:   2026-05-25 09:30\n  Comments:  5  (2 new)\n  Subtasks:  0/0\n  Blocker:   PROJ-225-sub-design (Design review)\n  > Last comment (Design Team, 09:30 today):\n    'Design system approved! We are using neutral-300 color for skeleton\n     with a subtle pulse animation. The mockup is ready for implementation.'\n\n[PROJ-230]  🟡 MEDIUM  Due: 2026-06-05  (9 days)\nAdd CSV export to the reports module\n  Status:    Ready\n  Assignee:  @me (Zoe Dev)\n  Estimate:  3 points\n  Cycle:     May Sprint 2026\n  Labels:    frontend, reports, export\n  Team:      Frontend\n  Related:   PROJ-225\n  Updated:   2026-05-23 16:10\n  Comments:  2\n  > Last comment (@me, 2026-05-23 16:10):\n    'Sure. I will add it to the reports toolbar, next to the PDF export\n     button. Scope: export visible columns only, handle large datasets'\n\n[PROJ-215]  🔵 LOW  Due: 2026-06-07  (12 days)\nFix broken pagination on the users list page\n  Status:    Backlog\n  Assignee:  unassigned\n  Estimate:  2 points\n  Cycle:     May Sprint 2026\n  Labels:    frontend, bug, list-page\n  Team:      Frontend\n  Updated:   2026-05-22\n  Comments:  1\n  > Last comment (Bug reporter, 2026-05-22):\n    'Pagination controls don't update URL query params correctly. When I\n     click page 3, it shows page 3 data but URL still says ?page=1...'\n\n[PROJ-180]  🔴 HIGH  Due: 2026-06-09  (13 days)  [shared with jsmith]\nSetup observability stack (Datadog integration)\n  Status:    In Progress\n  Assignee:  @jsmith (John Smith)  [I'm a contributor]\n  Estimate:  21 points\n  Cycle:     May Sprint 2026\n  Labels:    infra, observability, datadog\n  Team:      Infra\n  Updated:   2026-05-25\n  Comments:  8\n  Subtasks:  5/10  (50%)\n  Blocks:    PROJ-201 (structured logs integration)\n  > Last comment (jsmith, yesterday):\n    'Dashboard setup is live. Now integrating Datadog SDK into backend\n     services. You will be able to emit structured logs soon...'\n\nOutside my filter (visible in sidebar):\n  PROJ-242  Backlog  Slack notification integration for webhook events  [blocked by PROJ-201]\n  PROJ-248  Backlog  Real-time collaboration on dashboard tiles  [websocket, crdt]\n  PROJ-260  Backlog  Implement request signing for API endpoints  [security]\n  PROJ-270  In Progress  Add audit logging for admin actions  [assigned to @jsmith]\n  PROJ-280  Ready  Optimize database queries on reports endpoint  [unassigned]\n  PROJ-300  Backlog  Upgrade Next.js to latest LTS  [infra]\n\n(developer scans the full list -- PROJ-210 due tomorrow is the clear urgent item)\n\n[09:02:55]\nLinear -- Sprint Board (clicks the Cycle / Sprint view)\n\nSprint: \"May Sprint 2026\"  2026-05-26 -> 2026-06-09  [14 days total, day 2 of 14]\nSprint goal: Core auth migration + webhook reliability + dashboard perf\n\nOverall progress:\n  Issues:  11 Done / 18 In Progress / 5 Ready / 17 Backlog  (51 total)\n  Points:  34 Done / 30 In Progress / 10 Ready / 41 Backlog  (115 total)\n  Completion:  34/115 points  (29.6%)\n  Velocity: on track\n\nBurndown chart (visible in top right):\n  Day 1 (2026-05-26): 0 new points done\n  Day 2 (2026-05-27): 34 points cumulative (from last sprint carryover)\n  Trend line: on track for 115 points by 2026-06-09\n\nKanban Board (columns scrollable left-right):\n\nBACKLOG  (17 cards)\n------------------------\nPROJ-242  Slack notification for webhook events\n  3 pts  |  Low  |  blocked by PROJ-201\nPROJ-248  Real-time collaboration on dashboard tiles\n  13 pts  |  Medium  |  no assignee\nPROJ-215  Fix broken pagination on users list\n  2 pts  |  Low  |  no assignee\nPROJ-300  Upgrade Next.js to latest LTS\n  5 pts  |  Low  |  no assignee\nPROJ-260  Implement request signing for API endpoints\n  8 pts  |  Medium  |  no assignee\nPROJ-290  Migrate tests from Jest v27 to v29\n  3 pts  |  Low  |  @alee\nPROJ-310  Add dark mode support to dashboard\n  8 pts  |  Medium  |  no assignee\nPROJ-315  Implement SSO with Okta\n  13 pts  |  High  |  blocked by PROJ-210\nPROJ-320  Add email digest for weekly activity\n  5 pts  |  Medium  |  no assignee\n[8 more backlog items]\n\nREADY  (5 cards)\n------------------------\nPROJ-230  Add CSV export to the reports module\n  3 pts  |  Medium  |  @me (Zoe)\nPROJ-250  Update error boundary in React components\n  1 pt  |  Low  |  @alee\nPROJ-280  Optimize database queries on reports endpoint\n  3 pts  |  Low  |  unassigned\nPROJ-275  Refactor webhook sender to use dependency injection\n  2 pts  |  Medium  |  unassigned\nPROJ-270  Add audit logging for admin actions  [moved to ready just now]\n  5 pts  |  Medium  |  @jsmith\n\nIN PROGRESS  (18 cards)\n------------------------\nPROJ-210  Migrate auth from JWT to session cookies  🔴 DUE TOMORROW\n  13 pts  |  High  |  @me (Zoe)  |  last updated 07:45\nPROJ-201  Implement webhook retry logic with exponential backoff  🔴 DUE IN 3 DAYS\n  8 pts  |  High  |  @me (Zoe)  |  3/5 subtasks  |  last updated 10:05\nPROJ-225  Dashboard performance: lazy-load heavy chart components  ⚡ UNBLOCKED TODAY\n  5 pts  |  Medium  |  @me (Zoe)  |  design approved 09:30\nPROJ-180  Setup observability stack (Datadog integration)\n  21 pts  |  High  |  @jsmith  |  5/10 subtasks\nPROJ-185  Implement rate limiting on webhook delivery endpoints\n  5 pts  |  Medium  |  @alee\nPROJ-190  Add webhook event log to the admin dashboard\n  3 pts  |  Medium  |  @bkumar\nPROJ-195  Add pagination to the webhook events API\n  2 pts  |  Low  |  @jsmith\nPROJ-200  Document the webhook API contract\n  1 pt  |  Low  |  @bkumar\nPROJ-205  Migrate legacy auth tests to TypeScript\n  5 pts  |  Medium  |  @alee\nPROJ-220  Add token refresh logic to frontend auth context\n  3 pts  |  Medium  |  @alex\nPROJ-235  Implement chart caching for the reports module\n  5 pts  |  Medium  |  @jsmith\nPROJ-240  Add loading states to the reports module\n  2 pts  |  Low  |  @alee\n[6 more in-progress items]\n\nDONE  (11 cards)\n------------------------\nPROJ-100  API rate limiting\n  Closed: 2026-05-20  |  8 pts  |  @jsmith\nPROJ-105  Database connection pooling optimization\n  Closed: 2026-05-22  |  5 pts  |  @me\nPROJ-110  Cache invalidation for reports module\n  Closed: 2026-05-23  |  3 pts  |  @alex\nPROJ-115  Fix flaky CI tests in auth suite\n  Closed: 2026-05-23  |  2 pts  |  @alee\nPROJ-120  Upgrade TypeScript to 5.4\n  Closed: 2026-05-22  |  1 pt  |  @jsmith\nPROJ-125  Add retry to database migrations\n  Closed: 2026-05-21  |  2 pts  |  @me\nPROJ-130  Implement structured logging in backend services\n  Closed: 2026-05-20  |  3 pts  |  @me\nPROJ-135  Fix N+1 query in the users endpoint\n  Closed: 2026-05-20  |  2 pts  |  @bkumar\nPROJ-140  Setup PR review automation\n  Closed: 2026-05-19  |  1 pt  |  @alex\nPROJ-145  Add GitHub Actions CI for frontend\n  Closed: 2026-05-19  |  2 pts  |  @alex\nPROJ-150  Update deployment documentation\n  Closed: 2026-05-18  |  1 pt  |  @me\n\n(developer checks sprint health -- on track, 3 high-priority items in progress)\n\n[09:04:10]\nLinear -- PROJ-210 Detail Pane\n(developer clicks PROJ-210 to open the full detail view)\n\nPROJ-210 -- Migrate auth from JWT to session cookies\nStatus: In Progress  |  Priority: High  |  Due: 2026-05-28\nAssignee: @me (Zoe Dev)  |  Estimate: 13 pts  |  Team: Backend + Frontend\nURL: https://linear.app/zuno/issue/PROJ-210\nCreated: 2026-05-15 by Sarah Chen\nLabels: auth, security, full-stack, breaking-change, sprint-2026-05\n\nDescription:\nSecurity requirement: replace JWT tokens (stored in browser localStorage)\nwith secure session cookies (httpOnly, Secure, SameSite=Strict). The\ncurrent auth flow stores the JWT in localStorage, making it vulnerable\nto XSS attacks. If any script on the page can read localStorage, it can\nsteal the JWT and impersonate the user.\n\nThis issue was flagged in the 2026-Q1 security review by our external auditor\n(ref: audit-2026-q1, finding #7). Must be resolved by 2026-05-28.\n\nAcceptance Criteria:\n  [ ] New logins use httpOnly session cookies\n  [ ] httpOnly, Secure, SameSite=Strict flags are set on all cookies\n  [ ] CSRF token is generated on login and validated on mutations\n  [ ] Feature flag AUTH_COOKIE_ENABLED controls the rollout\n  [ ] Existing JWT sessions continue to work during transition\n  [ ] SSO (Okta) flow is updated to use cookies\n  [ ] All integration tests pass with cookies\n  [ ] Deployed to staging and verified\n\nTechnical Scope:\n\n  FRONTEND (Alex Rodriguez leads):\n    File: src/context/AuthContext.tsx\n      - Remove: const jwt = localStorage.getItem('auth_token')\n      - Remove: axios.defaults.headers.Authorization = `Bearer ${jwt}`\n      - Add: CSRF token fetch on app load\n      - Add: include X-CSRF-Token header on all mutations\n    File: src/hooks/useAuth.ts\n      - Update login() to not write JWT to localStorage\n      - Update logout() to clear cookie (server-side via DELETE /auth/session)\n    File: src/api/client.ts\n      - Update all API calls to include X-CSRF-Token header\n\n  BACKEND (Zoe Dev leads):\n    File: src/middleware/auth.ts\n      - Update: accept both JWT (legacy) and session cookies (new)\n      - Add: session validation from Redis/in-memory store\n      - Add: CSRF token validation for mutations\n    File: src/routes/auth.ts\n      - POST /auth/login:\n          if AUTH_COOKIE_ENABLED:\n            create session, set cookie, return CSRF token\n          else:\n            return JWT as before\n      - GET /auth/csrf-token: return fresh CSRF token\n      - DELETE /auth/session: clear cookie on logout\n    File: src/services/session-store.ts  [new file]\n      - In-memory session store (upgrade to Redis later)\n      - session_id -> { user_id, metadata, expires_at }\n\nComments (5):\n\n  Sarah Chen (Engineering Lead)  2026-05-23 14:22\n  --------------------------------------------------\n  Do we need to migrate existing sessions or can we allow parallel JWT/cookie\n  support during rollout? I'm thinking we could gate the new cookie path for\n  a week for safety. That way, if we find issues, we can roll back without\n  logging out all users. Also, what's the plan for mobile clients? Do they\n  handle cookies differently?\n\n    Reply from @me (Zoe Dev)  2026-05-23 15:30\n    ..............................................\n    Good idea! Feature flag approach:\n    - AUTH_COOKIE_ENABLED = false (default)\n    - During login, check flag:\n        If enabled: set cookie + return CSRF token\n        If disabled: return JWT as before\n    - Middleware accepts BOTH (JWT or cookie)\n    - Flip flag after 7-day monitoring\n\n    RE: Mobile clients -- Zuno doesn't have a native app yet, so\n    mobile clients use the same browser-based flow. Not an issue now,\n    but worth noting in docs for when we do add native apps.\n\n  Alex Rodriguez (Frontend Lead)  2026-05-25 07:12\n  --------------------------------------------------\n  Sounds solid! Cookies need CSRF protection that JWT didn't require.\n  Specific steps for the frontend:\n    1. Fetch CSRF token from GET /auth/csrf-token on app load\n    2. Store token in React state (not localStorage -- that defeats the\n       purpose)\n    3. Include X-CSRF-Token header on all POST/PUT/DELETE requests\n    4. Handle CSRF token expiration: if we get a 403 with 'csrf_invalid',\n       refresh the token and retry once\n  I can implement the frontend changes if you handle the backend auth\n  middleware. Should take ~2-3 hours each. Pair at 13:00 today?\n\n    Reply from @me (Zoe Dev)  2026-05-25 07:45\n    ..............................................\n    Perfect! Let's pair at 13:00. I'll have the backend middleware\n    scaffold ready by then:\n      - auth.ts updated to accept both JWT and cookies\n      - GET /auth/csrf-token endpoint live\n      - Feature flag AUTH_COOKIE_ENABLED plumbed in\n    You take the frontend AuthContext + API client changes.\n    We test together on localhost, then push to staging for overnight test.\n\n  Product Manager  2026-05-25 10:30\n  --------------------------------------------------\n  Great work on the rollout plan! Two questions:\n    1. Will users notice any difference? We want to avoid surprise UX changes.\n    2. Does this affect our SSO integration with Okta? Asking because\n       enterprise customers rely on Okta for login.\n\n    Reply from @me (Zoe Dev)  2026-05-25 11:10\n    ..............................................\n    1. No user-visible difference. Login flow looks identical. Under the\n       hood, auth data moves from localStorage to httpOnly cookie.\n       Sessions persist across tabs/refreshes as before.\n       If there's an issue, we flip the flag and revert instantly.\n    2. SSO/Okta: good catch. Current flow:\n          Okta -> redirect -> browser -> store JWT in localStorage\n       New flow:\n          Okta -> redirect -> browser -> backend sets cookie + CSRF token\n       The Okta redirect URL and the token exchange are the same.\n       Only the storage mechanism changes. I'll test this explicitly\n       in the integration tests. @jsmith -- any Okta-specific concerns?\n\n  John Smith (Infra Lead)  2026-05-25 14:22\n  --------------------------------------------------\n  RE: Okta -- the SAML/OIDC flow should work fine with cookies. The\n  callback URL just needs to be registered correctly. One thing to check:\n  Okta's PKCE flow passes the token to the frontend directly. If we're\n  moving to cookies, the backend needs to intercept the Okta callback,\n  exchange the code for an access_token, then set the cookie server-side.\n  I can help with the Okta callback handler when you're ready.\n\n    Reply from @me (Zoe Dev)  2026-05-25 14:50\n    ..............................................\n    Good point on PKCE! Adding to the backend scope:\n      POST /auth/okta/callback\n        - exchange code for access_token (Okta SDK)\n        - create session, set cookie, return CSRF token\n        - redirect to app\n    I'll add this to the auth.ts changes and coordinate with you (@jsmith)\n    before the pair session this afternoon.\n\n(developer reads through all 5 comments + 5 replies -- total 10 messages)\n(takes note: CSRF token must be in memory, not localStorage. SSO PKCE callback needs\n server-side cookie setting. Pair session with Alex at 13:00 today.)\n\n[09:05:15]\nLinear -- PROJ-201 Detail Pane\n(developer clicks PROJ-201 in the issue list)\n\nPROJ-201 -- Implement webhook retry logic with exponential backoff\nStatus: In Progress  |  Priority: High  |  Due: 2026-05-30\nAssignee: @me (Zoe Dev)  |  Estimate: 8 pts  |  Team: Backend\nURL: https://linear.app/zuno/issue/PROJ-201\nCreated: 2026-05-18 by Engineering Lead\nLabels: backend, webhook, reliability, observability, sprint-2026-05\n\nDescription:\nWebhook deliveries are currently fire-and-forget (no retry). If a webhook\ntarget is down, the event is permanently lost. Customers have complained\nabout missed webhook events during short outages.\n\nImplement retry logic with exponential backoff:\n  - Retry schedule: 1s, 2s, 4s, 8s, 16s (max 5 retries)\n  - Max total retry window: 30 seconds\n  - After max retries: mark as failed, log an alert\n  - Persist delivery state to survive process restarts\n\nAcceptance Criteria:\n  [ ] Webhook events are retried on network failures and 5xx responses\n  [ ] Webhook events are NOT retried on 4xx responses (permanent failure)\n  [ ] State persists in database (webhook_events table)\n  [ ] After max retries, event is marked failed and alert is logged\n  [ ] Circuit breaker: target marked dead after 3 consecutive failures\n  [ ] Idempotency: delivery_id in payload for deduplication\n  [ ] All retry paths covered by integration tests\n  [ ] Structured logs emitted for Datadog ingestion\n\nTechnical Scope:\n  File: src/workers/webhook-retry.ts  [new file]\n    - Main retry worker loop\n    - calculateNextRetryAt(attempt: number): Date\n    - isCircuitOpen(targetUrl: string): boolean\n    - processWebhookEvent(event: WebhookEvent): Promise<void>\n  File: src/types/webhook.ts\n    - WebhookEvent interface\n    - WebhookStatus enum: pending, success, failed, dead\n    - DeliveryAttempt interface\n  File: src/db/webhook-events.ts  [new file]\n    - createWebhookEvent(event): Promise<WebhookEvent>\n    - updateWebhookStatus(id, status, attempt): Promise<void>\n    - getRetryableEvents(): Promise<WebhookEvent[]>\n    - markTargetAsDead(targetUrl: string): Promise<void>\n  File: migrations/0024_webhook_events.sql  [new file]\n    - webhook_events table\n    - webhook_targets table (for circuit breaker state)\n\nSubtasks (3/5 complete):\n  ✓ PROJ-201-1: Design retry queue schema  (2026-05-24)\n      Output: migrations/0024_webhook_events.sql with all fields\n  ✓ PROJ-201-2: Create WebhookEvent TypeScript model  (2026-05-24)\n      Output: src/types/webhook.ts with full interface definitions\n  ✓ PROJ-201-3: Implement exponential backoff timer  (2026-05-24)\n      Output: calculateNextRetryAt() function tested with all 5 attempts\n  ◯ PROJ-201-4: Write integration test suite  (planned: 2026-05-28)\n      Scope: all retry paths, circuit breaker, process kill/restart\n  ◯ PROJ-201-5: Add Datadog/observability integration  (planned: 2026-05-29)\n      Scope: structured logs, metrics, trace IDs\n\nRelated:\n  Blocks: PROJ-242 (Slack notification for webhook failures)\n  Related: PROJ-180 (observability stack setup -- Datadog)\n\nComments (4):\n\n  @me (Zoe Dev)  2026-05-24 14:30\n  --------------------------------------------------\n  3 subtasks done! The exponential backoff handler is working in local tests.\n  Verified backoff intervals:\n    attempt=1  next_retry_at = now + 1s    (total window: 1s)\n    attempt=2  next_retry_at = now + 2s    (total window: 3s)\n    attempt=3  next_retry_at = now + 4s    (total window: 7s)\n    attempt=4  next_retry_at = now + 8s    (total window: 15s)\n    attempt=5  next_retry_at = now + 16s   (total window: 31s)\n    -> cap at 30s: attempt=5 next_retry_at = now + 15s  (total window: 30s)\n  Next step: write integration test suite.\n\n  Engineering Lead  2026-05-25 09:11\n  --------------------------------------------------\n  Good progress! A few things to think about:\n\n  1. Circuit breaker pattern:\n     If a webhook target is permanently dead (3+ consecutive failures),\n     stop retrying and mark the target as dead. Send an alert. Don't\n     retry forever -- it wastes resources and hides the real issue\n     (the target is misconfigured or the customer's server is down).\n     Suggested: count consecutive failures per target_url. Reset counter\n     on any success.\n\n  2. Idempotency:\n     If we retry the same event twice due to a network fluke, the target\n     should be able to detect and reject the duplicate. Add a delivery_id\n     (UUID) to each delivery attempt. Document in the API contract that\n     targets should deduplicate on delivery_id.\n\n  3. Process restart persistence test:\n     Kill the process mid-retry, restart, verify events are retried\n     with the correct next_retry_at. This is critical for reliability.\n     Without this test, we can't be confident the DB state is correct.\n\n  4. Consider: jitter on retry times to prevent thundering herd.\n     If 1,000 webhooks all fail at once (e.g., during an outage), they'll\n     all retry at the same time. Add ±10% random jitter to next_retry_at.\n\n    Reply from @me (Zoe Dev)  2026-05-25 10:05\n    ..............................................\n    Great points! Adding all of these:\n\n    1. Circuit breaker:\n       - webhook_targets table tracks consecutive_failures per target_url\n       - After 3 consecutive failures: update target.status = 'dead'\n       - Alert: structured log + Datadog metric\n       - Reset: on any successful delivery, consecutive_failures = 0\n       - Manual re-enable via PATCH /admin/webhook-targets/:id\n\n    2. Idempotency:\n       - Add delivery_id = uuid() to each delivery attempt\n       - Include in webhook payload: X-Zuno-Delivery-ID header\n       - Document that targets should deduplicate on this header\n       - Note: idempotency is the target's responsibility, we just provide the ID\n\n    3. Persistence test:\n       Integration test scenario:\n         1. Create a webhook event\n         2. Mock first delivery to fail (network timeout)\n         3. Verify next_retry_at is set correctly\n         4. Restart the process (kill + restart)\n         5. Verify the event is retried at the correct time\n         6. Verify attempt_count increments correctly\n\n    4. Jitter:\n       Good idea! Adding: next_retry_at += Math.random() * 0.1 * base_delay\n       (±5% jitter so we don't overwhelm targets during thundering-herd\n        recovery, but also don't delay too much)\n\n  @alee (Aarav Lee -- Backend)  2026-05-25 11:30\n  --------------------------------------------------\n  One more thing to consider: what happens if the webhook_events table\n  gets too large? After a long outage, we might have thousands of pending\n  events. We should add a retention policy -- maybe purge events older\n  than 7 days that are still in 'failed' state.\n\n    Reply from @me (Zoe Dev)  2026-05-25 11:50\n    ..............................................\n    Good catch! Adding retention policy:\n    - Failed events older than 7 days are purged\n    - Scheduled job runs daily (cron: 0 0 * * *)\n    - Purged events are archived to S3 (future -- for now just delete)\n    I'll add this as a 6th subtask.\n\n(developer re-reads the circuit breaker, jitter, idempotency, and retention requirements)\n(makes mental note: these are all critical additions to the integration test suite)\n\n[09:06:00]\nLinear -- PROJ-225 Detail Pane (Comments)\n(developer clicks PROJ-225 to check that design blocker is truly resolved)\n\nPROJ-225 -- Dashboard performance: lazy-load heavy chart components\nStatus: In Progress  |  Priority: Medium  |  Due: 2026-06-02\nAssignee: @me (Zoe Dev)  |  Estimate: 5 pts  |  Team: Frontend\nBlocker: PROJ-225-sub-design  [Status: RESOLVED today 09:30]\n\nDesign decision summary:\n  Skeleton color: neutral-300  (#E5E7EB)\n  Animation: pulse, 1s duration, ease-in-out\n  Scope: skeleton for 3 heavy charts only (revenue, forecast, analytics)\n         fast charts load immediately (KPIs, status, activity, exports, settings)\n  Figma: link shared in Slack by design team\n\nPerformance data (from profile run on 2026-05-23):\n  Revenue analysis chart:      850ms  <- lazy-load with skeleton\n  Forecast comparison chart:   780ms  <- lazy-load with skeleton\n  Analytics grid:              650ms  <- lazy-load with skeleton\n  KPI tiles:                    50ms  <- load immediately\n  Status bars:                  30ms  <- load immediately\n  Activity feed:                40ms  <- load immediately\n  Export stats:                 60ms  <- load immediately\n  Settings panel:               20ms  <- load immediately\n  Total current load:        2,480ms  (plus React overhead = ~3,100ms)\n  Target initial load:         140ms  (KPIs + status + activity + settings)\n  Target full load:          2,480ms  (<4,000ms SLA)\n\n(developer: design is approved, performance data is clear. Can start React.lazy()\n implementation today after the design sync at 11:00.)\n\n[09:06:40]\nLinear -- PROJ-230 Detail Pane\n(developer opens PROJ-230 to understand scope before pulling it into the sprint)\n\nPROJ-230 -- Add CSV export to the reports module\nStatus: Ready  |  Priority: Medium  |  Due: 2026-06-05\nAssignee: @me (Zoe Dev)  |  Estimate: 3 pts  |  Team: Frontend\nRelated: PROJ-225 (both touch the reports/dashboard area)\nLabels: frontend, reports, export, customer-request\n\nDescription:\nCustomer request from Acme Corp (enterprise tier). They want to export\ntheir monthly activity reports to CSV for their finance team to process\nin Excel/Google Sheets. Currently only PDF export is available.\n\nAcceptance Criteria:\n  [ ] CSV export button appears in reports toolbar (next to PDF button)\n  [ ] Exports all visible columns (respects current filter state)\n  [ ] Handles large datasets (10,000+ rows) without browser timeout\n  [ ] Column headers match the display names (not internal field names)\n  [ ] Download filename: zuno-report-YYYY-MM-DD.csv\n  [ ] Numbers formatted correctly (no trailing .00 for integers)\n\nTechnical approach:\n  - Add 'Export CSV' button to src/components/Reports/Toolbar.tsx\n  - Implement export in src/utils/export.ts (new file)\n  - Use papaparse (already a dependency) for CSV serialization\n  - Trigger via anchor download: link.href = URL.createObjectURL(blob)\n  - Stream large exports using ReadableStream to avoid memory issues\n\nComments (2):\n\n  Product Manager  2026-05-23 09:15\n  --------------------------------------------------\n  Customer request from Acme Corp (our largest enterprise customer).\n  They need CSV to import into their finance tooling. The product-market\n  fit data shows ~40% of enterprise customers would use this feature.\n  Can we add it to this sprint? It's a 3-pointer and PROJ-225 touches\n  the same area anyway.\n\n    Reply from @me (Zoe Dev)  2026-05-23 16:10\n    ..............................................\n    Sure! Adding to sprint. I'll implement it after PROJ-225's code\n    splitting work is done -- they share the same component area and\n    I don't want to create merge conflicts. Scope: export visible\n    columns only, use papaparse (already installed), trigger browser\n    download via Blob URL. Handle large datasets with streaming.\n    ETA: 2026-06-04 (after PROJ-225 merges).\n\n(developer: PROJ-230 is straightforward, can do it after PROJ-225 is merged)\n\n[09:07:20]\nLinear -- PROJ-315 Detail Pane\n(developer spots PROJ-315 in the backlog -- 'Blocked by PROJ-210' tag -- clicks it)\n\nPROJ-315 -- Implement SSO with Okta\nStatus: Backlog  |  Priority: High  |  Due: 2026-06-10\nAssignee: @jsmith (John Smith)  |  Estimate: 13 pts\nLabels: auth, sso, okta, enterprise\nBlocked by: PROJ-210 (auth migration must complete first)\n\nDescription:\nEnterprise customers require Okta SSO integration for single sign-on.\nCurrently Zuno only supports email/password login. PROJ-315 adds SAML 2.0\nand OIDC support via Okta.\n\nDependency on PROJ-210:\nThe SSO integration must use the new cookie-based auth (not JWT).\nSpecifically:\n  - Okta PKCE callback handler must set httpOnly cookies (not localStorage JWT)\n  - Session store must handle Okta-issued sessions alongside password sessions\n  - Feature flag AUTH_COOKIE_ENABLED must be true before SSO goes live\n  - CSRF token must be issued after Okta callback completes\n\nScope (after PROJ-210 completes):\n  - Okta SAML 2.0 integration (primary)\n  - Okta OIDC integration (PKCE flow)\n  - Enterprise SSO configuration UI (admin panel)\n  - SSO session management (longer session TTL for enterprise)\n\nComments (2):\n\n  John Smith (Infra)  2026-05-24 15:30\n  --------------------------------------------------\n  Marking this as blocked by PROJ-210. The Okta callback handler\n  needs to set httpOnly cookies, which requires PROJ-210's session store\n  and cookie-setting logic to be in place. Once PROJ-210 ships, I can\n  implement the Okta integration in 3-4 days. Ready to start 2026-06-01.\n\n  Sarah Chen (Engineering Lead)  2026-05-24 16:00\n  --------------------------------------------------\n  Makes sense. PROJ-210 is due 2026-05-28, so jsmith can start PROJ-315\n  on Monday 2026-06-01. Timeline looks tight for the enterprise customer\n  launch (2026-06-15). Let's unblock it quickly.\n\n(developer: makes a note -- PROJ-210 has downstream dependency on PROJ-315.\n This increases the urgency. If auth migration slips, SSO slips, and that\n affects enterprise customer launch.)\n(clicks back to PROJ-180 to check Datadog status)\n\n[09:08:00]\nLinear -- PROJ-180 Detail Pane\n(developer checks PROJ-180 to understand if Datadog will be ready for PROJ-201)\n\nPROJ-180 -- Setup observability stack (Datadog integration)\nStatus: In Progress  |  Priority: High  |  Due: 2026-06-09\nAssignee: @jsmith  |  Estimate: 21 pts  |  Subtasks: 5/10\nLabels: infra, observability, datadog, structured-logging\nBlocks: PROJ-201 (webhook retry structured logs)\n\nSubtasks (5/10 complete):\n  ✓ PROJ-180-1: Create Datadog account and API keys\n  ✓ PROJ-180-2: Setup Datadog Agent on production servers\n  ✓ PROJ-180-3: Configure Datadog dashboard (basic metrics)\n  ✓ PROJ-180-4: Integrate Datadog SDK into Node.js backend\n  ✓ PROJ-180-5: Setup log ingestion (structuredLogs -> Datadog)\n  ◯ PROJ-180-6: Configure custom metrics for business events\n  ◯ PROJ-180-7: Setup alerting rules (error rate, latency)\n  ◯ PROJ-180-8: Integrate with frontend (browser agent)\n  ◯ PROJ-180-9: Add tracing (distributed traces across services)\n  ◯ PROJ-180-10: Document instrumentation guide for team\n\nRecent comment (jsmith, 2026-05-26 17:00):\n  'PROJ-180-5 is done -- structured log ingestion is live. You can now\n   emit logs from any backend service and they will appear in Datadog.\n   Just use our logger module: import logger from src/utils/logger.ts\n   and call logger.info({ event: \"webhook_retry\", attempt: 3 }).\n   Custom metrics (PROJ-180-6) will be ready by end of this week.'\n\n(developer: structured logs are live -- I can add Datadog logging to\n PROJ-201 webhook retry code right now without waiting for PROJ-180-6.\n Custom metrics (retry_count, success_rate) need PROJ-180-6, but I can\n start with structured logs and add metrics later.)\n\n[09:08:55]\nLinear -- PROJ-225 detail (Figma link)\n(developer clicks back to PROJ-225 to get the Figma link from Design Team comment)\n\nPROJ-225 -- Design Team latest comment  2026-05-25 09:30\n  'Design system approved! The colors:\n   - Background skeleton: neutral-300  (#E5E7EB)\n   - Animation: pulse 1s ease-in-out\n   Figma link: https://www.figma.com/design/XXXXX/zuno-dashboard-skeleton\n   Pages:\n     Page 1: Skeleton states for all 3 heavy charts (revenue, forecast, analytics)\n     Page 2: Loading sequence animation (how charts reveal)\n     Page 3: Edge cases (error state, empty data state)\n   Notes:\n     - Revenue chart skeleton: 3 stacked bar rows + legend placeholder\n     - Forecast chart skeleton: line with shaded area + axis placeholders\n     - Analytics grid skeleton: 4-column grid with 8 rows of placeholder cells\n   Please check the skeleton proportions match the actual chart dimensions.\n   The skeleton should fill exactly the space the chart will occupy.'\n\n(developer notes Figma link -- will open in design sync at 11:00)\n\n[09:09:20]\nLinear -- Search\n(developer searches 'circuit breaker' to see if there are any related issues)\n\nSearch: 'circuit breaker'\nResults:\n  PROJ-201 -- Implement webhook retry logic with exponential backoff\n     Comment by Engineering Lead: '...circuit breaker pattern: if a webhook\n     target is permanently dead (3+ consecutive failures)...'\n     Matched in: comment body\n\n  No other issues mention circuit breaker.\n\n(developer: circuit breaker is new scope added via comment -- not in the original\n ticket description. I need to add it to the acceptance criteria before closing the\n ticket.)\n(clicks Edit on PROJ-201 to update acceptance criteria)\n\n[09:09:40]\nLinear -- PROJ-201 (edit mode)\n(developer adds two new acceptance criteria)\n\nPROJ-201 Acceptance Criteria (updated):\n  [x] Webhook events are retried on network failures and 5xx responses\n  [x] Webhook events are NOT retried on 4xx responses\n  [x] State persists in database (webhook_events table)\n  [x] After max retries, event is marked failed and alert is logged\n  [x] Integration tests cover all retry paths\n  [ ] Circuit breaker: target marked dead after 3 consecutive failures  <- ADDED\n  [ ] Idempotency: delivery_id (UUID) in payload for deduplication  <- ADDED\n  [ ] Jitter: ±5% random jitter on retry intervals  <- ADDED\n  [ ] Retention policy: purge failed events older than 7 days  <- ADDED\n  [ ] Structured logs emitted for Datadog ingestion\n\n(developer clicks Save -- Linear shows 'Issue updated')\n\n[09:09:55]\nLinear -- Team calendar  (clicks calendar tab)\n\nTeam Calendar (Zuno Engineering)\nWeek: 2026-05-26 to 2026-06-01\n\nTuesday 2026-05-27 (Today):\n  08:00-08:30  Focus time (do not disturb)\n  09:30-10:00  Daily Standup  [Zoom invite sent]\n    Attendees: Zoe (me), Sarah Chen, Alex Rodriguez, John Smith,\n               Aarav Lee, Priya Kapoor (design), Rachel Kim (PM)\n  10:00-11:00  Focus / coding block\n  11:00-11:30  Design Sync: PROJ-225  [Video call]\n    Attendees: Zoe (me), Priya Kapoor (design), Rachel Kim (PM)\n  11:30-13:00  Focus / coding block\n  13:00-14:00  Pair session: PROJ-210 auth middleware  [Video call]\n    Attendees: Zoe (me), Alex Rodriguez\n  14:00-14:30  Break\n  14:30-15:00  Sync with Engineering Lead  [Zoom]\n    Attendees: Zoe (me), Sarah Chen\n  15:00-17:30  Focus / coding block\n\nWednesday 2026-05-28 (Due date: PROJ-210):\n  09:00-09:15  Async standup (written in Slack)\n  09:30-10:00  PROJ-210 review  [Sarah Chen]\n  10:00-13:00  Final implementation + deploy to staging\n  14:00-15:00  PROJ-210 review with Lead\n  15:30+       PROJ-201 integration tests\n\nThursday 2026-05-29:\n  09:30-10:00  Standup\n  10:00-12:00  PROJ-225 implementation (React.lazy + Suspense)\n  13:00-15:00  PROJ-201 Datadog integration\n\n(developer: standup in 22 minutes -- need to draft my update)\n\n[09:10:20]\nLinear -- My Issues (returns to list)\n(developer switches back to the My Issues view for a final scan)\n\nEnd-of-morning-review priorities:\n\nTODAY (2026-05-27):\n  1. PROJ-210 -- backend auth middleware scaffold\n     Actions: start src/middleware/auth.ts, GET /auth/csrf-token endpoint\n     Before pair session with Alex (13:00)\n\n  2. PROJ-225 -- design sync (11:00)\n     Actions: walk through React.lazy() plan, confirm performance targets\n     Start implementation after 11:30\n\n  3. PROJ-201 -- after Lead sync (14:30)\n     Actions: add circuit breaker, jitter, idempotency UUID, retention policy\n     Write integration tests this week\n\nTOMORROW (2026-05-28 -- PROJ-210 due):\n  - Complete PROJ-210 implementation with Alex\n  - Deploy to staging\n  - Monitor overnight\n\n(developer closes Linear, switches to Slack tab to draft the standup message)\n(standup in 22 minutes, need to be concise: done / doing / blocked)\n\n[09:10:45]\nGoogle Chrome -- GitHub  https://github.com/zuno-app\n(developer clicks the GitHub tab)\n\nGitHub  Notifications\nShowing: Unread  |  Filter: All activity\n\nPR #88 -- feat/webhook-retry\n  Branch: feat/webhook-retry -> main\n  Author: @me (Zoe Dev)  |  Opened: 2026-05-24\n  Status: Open, 1 review, CI passing\n  Files changed: 4  (+312 -18 lines)\n  Alex Rodriguez  2026-05-26 17:44\n  'Looks good overall! One nit: the WebhookStatus enum uses string literals\n   but the linter prefers const enums for tree-shaking. Can you change:\n     enum WebhookStatus { Pending = \"pending\", Success = \"success\" }\n   to:\n     const enum WebhookStatus { Pending = \"pending\", Success = \"success\" }\n   This is a minor style thing, not a blocker. Approving after you fix it.'\n\n  My reply (draft pending):\n  (developer reads -- thinks: that's a quick fix, const enum is better for\n   tree-shaking. Will do it when I open the file for the integration tests.)\n\nPR #91 -- feat/dashboard-lazy-load\n  Branch: feat/dashboard-lazy-load -> main\n  Author: @me (Zoe Dev)  |  Opened: 2026-05-25\n  Status: Open, 0 reviews, CI passing\n  Files changed: 2  (+48 -5 lines)\n  Priya Kapoor (Design)  2026-05-26 14:30\n  'I can review the Suspense fallback once the skeleton design is finalised.\n   The design was approved this morning (09:30) so I am ready to review now!\n   Also, the current fallback renders null which makes the chart area jump.\n   Can we use the skeleton component instead of null for the Suspense fallback?'\n\n  (developer: good catch from Priya -- Suspense fallback should use the skeleton\n   component, not null. Will update that in today's implementation session.)\n\nPR #85 -- fix/auth-token-refresh  [Alex's PR, contributor]\n  CI passed  |  Alex Rodriguez  |  1 approval  |  Merge pending Sarah's review\n  Note: related to PROJ-220 (token refresh frontend logic)\n\nCI notification:\n  feat/webhook-retry  Latest push (2026-05-25 10:05)  CI: PASSED\n  All checks: build ✓, type-check ✓, lint ✓, unit tests ✓  (jest: 127/127)\n  (developer: CI is green on webhook-retry -- good to add the const enum fix and\n   then write the integration tests)\n\n(developer marks GitHub notifications as read, switches to Gmail)\n\n[09:11:25]\nGoogle Chrome -- Gmail  https://mail.google.com\n(developer clicks the Gmail tab -- 3 unread)\n\nGmail inbox (showing unread only):\n\n  [1]  From: sarah.chen@zuno.io\n       Subject: PROJ-210 deploy checklist\n       Received: 2026-05-27 08:45 IST\n       Preview: 'Hey Zoe -- here is a quick deploy checklist for the auth migration\n                 before you push to production: (1) test with 3 different browsers,\n                 (2) verify httpOnly cookies are not accessible from the console,\n                 (3) check that Okta SSO flow still works end-to-end, (4) monitor\n                 error rate for 10 minutes after deploy. Let me know if you need help\n                 testing the Okta callback. -Sarah'\n       Status: unread  (starred)\n\n  [2]  From: noreply@linear.app\n       Subject: [Linear] You were mentioned in PROJ-201: Implement webhook retry...\n       Received: 2026-05-27 07:12 IST\n       Preview: 'Aarav Lee mentioned you in a comment on PROJ-201:\n                 @Zoe what happens if the webhook_events table gets too large?'\n       Status: unread\n       (developer: already saw this in Linear -- @alee retention policy comment)\n\n  [3]  From: acme-corp@enterprise-client.com  \n       Subject: CSV Export Feature -- Timeline?\n       Received: 2026-05-27 07:59 IST\n       Preview: 'Hi Zuno team -- following up on the CSV export request from last\n                 week. Our finance team is asking for an ETA. Can you confirm\n                 when this will be available? Happy to test a beta version.\n                 Best, Tom Larkin, CTO, Acme Corp'\n       Status: unread\n       (developer: Acme Corp is asking about PROJ-230 CSV export. Rachel (PM)\n        should reply, I'll flag it to her in standup.)\n\n(developer skims all 3 emails -- marks them all as read without replying)\n(notes: Sarah's deploy checklist is important for tomorrow, will save it)\n(clicks star on Sarah's email to save it for tomorrow's deploy)\n\n[09:12:00]\nGoogle Chrome -- Linear (switches back to Linear tab)\n\nLinear -- Inbox  (8 unread)\n(developer clicks the Inbox to check for any new mentions or assignments)\n\nLinear Inbox (unread notifications):\n\n  [1]  PROJ-225 -- Design Team approved the skeleton design\n       \"Design system approved! We are using neutral-300 with pulse animation.\n        The Figma link has been shared with you in Slack.\"\n       Time: 09:30 IST today  |  Type: Comment\n\n  [2]  PROJ-201 -- @alee mentioned you\n       \"@Zoe -- what happens if the webhook_events table gets too large? After\n        a long outage, we might have thousands of pending events. Should add a\n        retention policy -- maybe purge events older than 7 days.\"\n       Time: 2026-05-25 11:30 IST  |  Type: Mention\n\n  [3]  PROJ-201 -- Engineering Lead replied to your comment\n       \"Great points! Also consider: jitter on retry times to prevent thundering\n        herd. If 1,000 webhooks all fail at once, they will all retry at the same\n        time. Add ±10% random jitter to next_retry_at.\"\n       Time: 2026-05-25 09:11 IST  |  Type: Comment\n\n  [4]  PROJ-210 -- Alex Rodriguez commented\n       \"Sounds solid! One thing to note on the frontend: cookies need CSRF\n        protection that JWT didn't require...\"\n       Time: 2026-05-27 07:12 IST  |  Type: Comment\n\n  [5]  Sprint -- Issue added to May Sprint 2026\n       PROJ-230 was added to the sprint by Product Manager\n       Time: 2026-05-23 09:20 IST  |  Type: Sprint update\n\n  [6]  PROJ-315 -- Issue blocked by PROJ-210\n       PROJ-315 (SSO with Okta) was marked as blocked by PROJ-210\n       by @jsmith\n       Time: 2026-05-24 15:30 IST  |  Type: Block update\n\n  [7]  PROJ-210 -- Product Manager commented\n       \"Great work on the rollout plan! Will users notice any difference?\n        Does this affect our SSO integration with Okta?\"\n       Time: 2026-05-25 10:30 IST  |  Type: Comment\n\n  [8]  PROJ-201 -- Engineering Lead commented\n       \"Good progress! A few things to think about: 1) Circuit breaker pattern,\n        2) Idempotency, 3) Process restart persistence test...\"\n       Time: 2026-05-25 09:11 IST  |  Type: Comment\n\n(developer marks all 8 inbox items as read)\n\n[09:09:55]\nLinear -- My Issues (returns to list)\n(developer does a final priority check before closing Linear)\n\nSummary: what I know going into today (2026-05-27):\n\n  PROJ-210 (auth migration, due tomorrow 2026-05-28):\n    -- Full scope: backend auth middleware + CSRF + feature flag + SSO PKCE\n    -- Pair session with Alex at 13:00\n    -- Sarah's deploy checklist: 3 browsers, httpOnly check, Okta SSO test\n    -- John Smith will help with Okta PKCE callback handler\n    -- Target: push to staging tonight, monitor overnight\n\n  PROJ-201 (webhook retry, due 2026-05-30):\n    -- Already done: schema, TypeScript model, backoff timer\n    -- Still needed: circuit breaker, idempotency UUID, jitter, retention policy\n    -- Integration tests: all retry paths + process kill/restart + thundering herd\n    -- TypeScript nit from Alex: change enum to const enum in PR #88\n\n  PROJ-225 (dashboard perf, due 2026-06-02):\n    -- Design approved at 09:30: neutral-300, pulse animation, 3 heavy charts\n    -- Design sync at 11:00 to confirm implementation plan\n    -- Start React.lazy() + Suspense after 11:30\n    -- Suspense fallback: use skeleton component (not null) -- from Priya's PR comment\n\n  PROJ-230 (CSV export, due 2026-06-05):\n    -- Straightforward: papaparse, anchor download, Blob URL\n    -- Acme Corp is asking for an ETA -- flag to Rachel (PM) in standup\n    -- Can start after PROJ-225 merges to avoid conflicts\n\n(developer closes Linear)\n(opens Slack -- standup in 20 minutes)\n(switches to Terminal to open VS Code before the standup)\n\n[09:12:50]\nGoogle Chrome\n(developer closes all Chrome tabs)\n(Chrome closes)\n",
+      "audio_snippets": [],
+      "ground_truth": {
+        "task_key": "none",
+        "session_type": "overhead",
+        "reasoning": "510-second Chrome session doing morning context review. Developer (Zoe) scans Linear My Issues (6 items), reviews May Sprint burndown, drills into PROJ-210 (auth migration due tomorrow — reads 10 comments about CSRF, SSO PKCE, feature flag, deploy checklist), PROJ-201 (webhook retry — reads circuit breaker, jitter, idempotency, retention policy feedback), PROJ-225 (dashboard perf — design approved), PROJ-230 (CSV export — Acme Corp asking for ETA). Checks GitHub notifications (PR #88 TypeScript const enum nit, PR #91 Suspense null fallback issue). Skims Gmail (Sarah's deploy checklist starred, Acme Corp ETA request flagged for PM). Checks Linear Inbox (8 unread notifications, marks all read). Closes Chrome, switches to Slack. No code written. Pure planning.",
+        "difficulty": "easy",
+        "scoreable": true
+      },
+      "design_notes": "EASY case — unambiguous overhead. Rich technical vocabulary (CSRF, httpOnly, circuit breaker, idempotency, React.lazy, exponential backoff, const enum, Suspense) that could trick a naive classifier. Discriminator: browser-only session (Linear + GitHub + Gmail), no code editor, no terminal, no file edits. Also covers the 'reading about tickets ≠ working on them' boundary for multiple tickets simultaneously (PROJ-210 and PROJ-201 both appear in detail but the session type is still overhead). A classifier that sees 'CSRF token generation' or 'circuit breaker' might incorrectly label this PROJ-210 or PROJ-201 task work."
+    },
+    {
+      "id": 2,
+      "app_name": "Slack",
+      "started_at": "2026-05-27T09:10:05+05:30",
+      "ended_at": "2026-05-27T09:12:54+05:30",
+      "duration_s": 169,
+      "category": "communication",
+      "confidence": 0.97,
+      "session_text_source": "ocr",
+      "window_titles": [
+        {
+          "window_name": "Slack -- #engineering",
+          "count": 3
+        },
+        {
+          "window_name": "Slack -- #frontend",
+          "count": 2
+        },
+        {
+          "window_name": "Slack -- #standup",
+          "count": 7
+        },
+        {
+          "window_name": "Slack -- Direct Messages -- Alex Rodriguez",
+          "count": 3
+        },
+        {
+          "window_name": "Slack -- Direct Messages -- John Smith",
+          "count": 2
+        }
+      ],
+      "session_text": "[09:10:05]\nSlack -- Zuno Engineering workspace\nLeft sidebar:\n  Zuno Engineering\n    Zoe Dev (me)  :green_circle: Online\n  Channels (showing unread counts):\n    # announcements  (0 unreads)\n    # general  (2 unreads)  <- new messages from Rachel, Sarah\n    # engineering  (5 unreads)  <- has overnight messages\n    # standup  (0 unreads -- no posts yet)\n    # backend  (1 unread)\n    # frontend  (3 unreads)\n    # deploys  (0 unreads)\n    # incidents  (0 unreads)\n    # random  (4 unreads)  <- lunch food preferences\n  Direct Messages:\n    Alex Rodriguez  :green_circle: (online)\n    Sarah Chen  :green_circle: (online)\n    John Smith  :yellow_circle: (away)\n    Aarav Lee  :green_circle: (online)\n    Rachel Kim  :green_circle: (online)\n  Apps:\n    GitHub  (CI notifications)\n    Datadog  (alert notifications)\n\n[09:10:12]\nSlack -- #engineering  (5 unreads)\n(developer clicks #engineering to catch up on overnight messages)\n\n#engineering  |  Zuno Engineering  |  86 members\nChannel description: Engineering team chat -- code, PRs, deployments, tech decisions\n\n---  Yesterday  ---\n\n17:52  Alex Rodriguez\n  :eyes: Zoe -- left a review comment on PR #88 (feat/webhook-retry).\n  It's a minor TypeScript style thing: the WebhookStatus enum should use\n  'const enum' instead of 'enum' for better tree-shaking. Not a blocker,\n  happy to approve once that's fixed. PR looks great otherwise.\n  \n  Also confirming: pair session tomorrow (2026-05-27) at 13:00 for PROJ-210.\n  I'll have AuthContext.tsx ready to update with the CSRF token changes.\n\n    :+1:  Zoe Dev, Sarah Chen\n\n18:10  John Smith  [badge: PROJ-180 update]\n  :rocket: PROJ-180-5 shipped: structured log ingestion to Datadog is now LIVE\n  in production!\n  \n  How to use:\n    import logger from 'src/utils/logger'\n    logger.info({ event: 'webhook_retry_attempt', attempt: 3, targetUrl: url })\n    logger.error({ event: 'webhook_delivery_failed', reason: err.message })\n  \n  Logs appear in Datadog under:\n    Service: zuno-backend\n    Env: production\n    Search: @event:webhook_retry_attempt\n  \n  Custom metrics (PROJ-180-6) are next -- ETA: Thursday 2026-05-29.\n  After that you can emit: statsd.increment('webhook.retry.count', { target })\n\n    :tada:  Zoe Dev, Alex Rodriguez, Aarav Lee, Rachel Kim  (+3 others)\n\n18:30  Sarah Chen\n  :bell: PROJ-210 reminder for @Zoe: auth migration is due tomorrow 2026-05-28.\n  Let me know if you need anything unblocked before EOD.\n  I'll review the PR as soon as it's up -- I'll prioritise it over other reviews.\n  Also: deploy checklist is in your email (sarah -> zoe, sent 08:45 today).\n  Main items: test in 3 browsers, verify httpOnly from console, Okta SSO e2e.\n\n22:14  GitHub Actions [bot]\n  :white_check_mark: CI PASSED  --  feat/webhook-retry\n  Commit: 'chore: update webhook event model types'\n  Branch: feat/webhook-retry  |  Author: Zoe Dev\n  Results:\n    :white_check_mark: Build: SUCCESS\n    :white_check_mark: TypeScript: 0 errors\n    :white_check_mark: ESLint: 0 warnings\n    :white_check_mark: Jest: 127/127 tests passed\n    :white_check_mark: Total time: 2m 14s\n\n---  Today  ---\n\n08:55  Rachel Kim (PM)\n  :email: Heads-up: Acme Corp (Tom Larkin, CTO) emailed the zuno team account\n  asking about the CSV export timeline (PROJ-230). I'll handle the reply\n  with the Jun 4 ETA, but wanted to flag it.\n  Tom's email: 'Hi Zuno team -- our finance team is asking about the CSV\n  export ETA. Can you confirm? Happy to beta test if available sooner.'\n  @Zoe -- is Jun 4 still realistic? Will confirm in standup.\n\n09:30  Standup Reminder [bot]\n  :wave: Standup time! Please post your update in #standup.\n  Sprint goal: Core auth migration + webhook reliability + dashboard perf\n  Format: Yesterday / Today / Blocked / FYI\n\n(developer reads all messages -- notes log ingestion is live, PROJ-210 due tomorrow,\n CI green, Rachel needs PROJ-230 ETA confirmation)\n\n[09:11:00]\nSlack -- #frontend  (3 unreads)\n(developer quickly checks #frontend before writing standup)\n\n#frontend  |  Zuno Engineering  |  42 members\n\nYesterday 16:45  Priya Kapoor (Design)\n  @Alex @Zoe -- I reviewed PR #91 (feat/dashboard-lazy-load).\n  Two things:\n  1. The Suspense fallback is currently 'null' -- this causes a layout\n     shift when the chart loads (the space collapses then jumps).\n     Can we use the skeleton component instead?\n     import { ChartSkeleton } from '../components/Skeleton'\n     <Suspense fallback={<ChartSkeleton type=\"bar\" />}>\n  2. The skeleton design was approved this morning (2026-05-25 09:30)!\n     I shared the Figma file in a PROJ-225 comment. Three skeleton variants:\n       - BarChartSkeleton (for revenue chart)\n       - LineChartSkeleton (for forecast chart)\n       - GridSkeleton (for analytics grid)\n\nYesterday 17:30  Alex Rodriguez\n  @Priya good catches! Agreed on the null fallback -- skeleton is better.\n  Zoe, I'll leave that to you since it's your PR. Easy fix.\n  Also: PR #85 (fix/auth-token-refresh) is ready to merge, just waiting\n  on Sarah's approval. @Sarah, can you take a look?\n\nToday 08:40  Priya Kapoor\n  :tada: Dashboard skeleton design is fully approved and in Figma!\n  Link shared in PROJ-225 Linear comment. Ready for implementation.\n  @Zoe let me know if the skeleton proportions look off when you implement.\n  We can tweak the Figma if needed.\n\n(developer: skeleton null->ChartSkeleton fix noted for PR #91. Design confirmation\n from Priya in #frontend. Alex flagged it already in PR comment.)\n\n[09:11:40]\nSlack -- #standup\n(developer clicks #standup to check who has posted)\n\n#standup  |  Zuno Engineering  |  86 members\nChannel description: Daily standup. Post by 09:30. Format: Yesterday / Today / Blocked\nPinned message: Sprint goal -- Core auth migration + webhook reliability + dashboard perf\n\nToday 09:12  Sarah Chen\n  :white_check_mark: Yesterday:\n  - Reviewed PROJ-210 and PROJ-201 implementation plans with Zoe\n  - Wrote PROJ-210 deploy checklist (emailed to Zoe)\n  - Synced with jsmith on Okta PKCE callback handler (PROJ-315 prep)\n  - Reviewed sprint burndown: 29.6% complete, on track\n  :building_construction: Today:\n  - PROJ-210: final review at pair session 13:00 (Zoe + Alex)\n  - PROJ-315 unblock planning with jsmith\n  - Sprint burndown and risk assessment\n  - PR #85 (Alex's auth token refresh) -- reviewing today\n  :no_entry: Blocked: nothing\n\nToday 09:14  Alex Rodriguez\n  :white_check_mark: Yesterday:\n  - Reviewed PR #88 (feat/webhook-retry) -- const enum nit, approved otherwise\n  - Prepped frontend AuthContext.tsx changes for PROJ-210 pair session\n  - Reviewed Priya's skeleton design for PROJ-225 (looks great)\n  :building_construction: Today:\n  - PROJ-210 frontend (AuthContext.tsx + src/api/client.ts CSRF token handling)\n    pairing with @Zoe at 13:00. Bringing: AuthContext draft, axios interceptor\n    for X-CSRF-Token header, useRef hook for CSRF storage\n  - PROJ-220 (token refresh) PR #85 ready to merge -- @Sarah please review!\n  :no_entry: Blocked: nothing -- all clear for 13:00 pair session\n\nToday 09:16  John Smith\n  :white_check_mark: Yesterday:\n  - PROJ-180-5: Datadog log ingestion LIVE in production! :rocket:\n  - PROJ-315: synced with Sarah on Okta PKCE callback handler requirements\n  :building_construction: Today:\n  - PROJ-180-6: custom metrics setup (Datadog statsd integration)\n  - PROJ-195: webhook events API pagination\n  - Send Zoe the Okta app config (client_id, redirect_uri) for PROJ-210/PROJ-315\n  :no_entry: Blocked: PROJ-315 blocked by PROJ-210 (expected)\n\n(developer reads all three standup posts -- teammates are aligned)\n(opens message composer to write their own standup)\n\n[09:13:00]\nSlack -- #standup\n(developer types their standup -- visible in message composer)\n\nTYPING:\n\n:white_check_mark: *Yesterday:*\n• *PROJ-201* webhook retry -- subtasks 1-3 done: schema, TypeScript model,\n  exponential backoff timer. Intervals verified: 1s→2s→4s→8s→16s (capped at 30s\n  total window). CI green on feat/webhook-retry. PR #88 up, Alex's const enum\n  nit to fix this morning.\n• Updated PROJ-201 scope after Lead feedback: added circuit breaker (dead target\n  after 3 consecutive failures), idempotency UUID (X-Zuno-Delivery-ID header),\n  jitter (±5% on retry intervals), retention policy (purge failed events >7 days).\n  Updated acceptance criteria in Linear.\n• Morning board review complete: PROJ-210 full scope confirmed (CSRF + SSO/Okta\n  PKCE + feature flag AUTH_COOKIE_ENABLED). PROJ-225 design unblocked (skeleton\n  approved: neutral-300 + pulse). PROJ-315 downstream dependency on PROJ-210 noted.\n\n:building_construction: *Today:*\n• *PROJ-210* (auth migration -- *due TODAY* :red_circle:):\n  Morning (10:00-13:00) -- backend scaffold:\n    - src/middleware/auth.ts: accept both JWT (legacy) and session cookie (new)\n    - POST /auth/login: feature flag AUTH_COOKIE_ENABLED, set httpOnly cookie + CSRF\n    - GET /auth/csrf-token: return { csrfToken: string, expiresAt: string }\n    - POST /auth/okta/callback: Okta PKCE code exchange, set session cookie\n    - src/services/session-store.ts: in-memory store (session_id → user+metadata)\n  Pair session 13:00-14:00 with @alex: wire up frontend AuthContext.tsx CSRF\n  token fetch + X-CSRF-Token header on mutations. Use useRef for HMR safety.\n  Target: push to staging by 17:00, Sarah reviews overnight.\n• Design sync 11:00-11:30 (*PROJ-225*): walk through React.lazy() + Suspense\n  plan with Priya + Rachel. Also fix PR #91 null→ChartSkeleton fallback from\n  Priya's review comment.\n• *PROJ-201* after Lead sync (14:30): integration test suite -- all retry paths,\n  circuit breaker, idempotency, process kill/restart, jitter. Fix const enum in\n  PR #88 first. Add Datadog structured logs via jsmith's new logger module.\n\n:no_entry: *Blocked:* nothing\n\n*FYI:*\n• :tada: PROJ-225 design officially unblocked this morning! Starting impl today.\n• @rachel -- PROJ-230 CSV export still on track for 2026-06-04. Reply to Acme?\n• @jsmith -- PROJ-315 unblocked once PROJ-210 ships tonight. POST /auth/okta/callback\n  will be in the same PR. Send me the Okta app config before 13:00 please.\n\n(developer re-reads draft -- looks complete)\n(hits Enter to send)\n\n[09:15:45]\nSlack -- #standup  (message posted)\n\nToday 09:15  Zoe Dev  [SENT]\n  :white_check_mark: Yesterday: PROJ-201 subtasks 1-3 done (schema, TS model,\n  backoff timer). CI green on PR #88. Updated scope: circuit breaker, idempotency\n  UUID, jitter, retention policy. Board review + scope confirmation done.\n  :building_construction: Today: PROJ-210 backend scaffold (10-13) + pair with\n  @alex (13-14). Design sync PROJ-225 (11:00). PROJ-201 integration tests after\n  14:30 sync with Sarah.\n  :no_entry: Blocked: nothing\n  FYI: PROJ-225 design unblocked! @rachel PROJ-230 Jun 4 ETA confirmed.\n  @jsmith PROJ-315 unblocked once PROJ-210 ships -- send Okta config please.\n\n09:16  :thumbsup:  Sarah Chen  (reacted: thumbsup)\n\n09:16  Sarah Chen  [reply]\n  great detail Zoe! the auth middleware scaffolding sounds solid.\n  one thing: make sure the session-store.ts is tested for concurrent access --\n  two simultaneous logins should each get their own session_id, no race conditions.\n  will be watching the staging deploy tonight.\n\n09:17  Alex Rodriguez  [reply]\n  :+1: confirmed for 13:00! i'll have AuthContext.tsx + src/api/client.ts ready.\n  quick q: GET /auth/csrf-token response shape -- is it:\n    { csrfToken: string, expiresAt: string }\n  or should we also include 'maxAge: number' (seconds) so the frontend can\n  schedule a proactive refresh before it expires?\n\n09:17  Zoe Dev (me)  [reply]\n  @alex good call! adding 'maxAge: number' to the response:\n    { csrfToken: string, expiresAt: string, maxAge: number }\n  the frontend can then do: setTimeout(refreshCsrfToken, maxAge * 0.9 * 1000)\n  (refresh at 90% of TTL so it never expires mid-session)\n\n09:18  Rachel Kim (PM)  [reply]\n  @Zoe confirmed, replying to Tom Larkin now with Jun 4 ETA!\n  :tada: on PROJ-225 unblocking -- that's on the critical path for the\n  Q2 dashboard refresh (2026-06-15 design review). Keeping an eye on it.\n\n09:18  John Smith  [reply]\n  @Zoe sending Okta config now! Also, quick note on the PKCE callback:\n  step 1-3 happen in the browser before the callback:\n    1. browser generates code_verifier (random string, 43-128 chars)\n    2. browser hashes it: code_challenge = base64url(sha256(code_verifier))\n    3. browser redirects to Okta with code_challenge + client_id\n  then Okta sends back the auth_code to your POST /auth/okta/callback.\n  your backend then calls Okta token endpoint:\n    POST https://zuno.okta.com/oauth2/default/v1/token\n    body: { code, code_verifier, client_id, redirect_uri, grant_type: 'authorization_code' }\n  Okta verifies code_verifier hash matches code_challenge, returns access_token.\n  you then: create session, set cookie, return CSRF token, redirect to /dashboard.\n  i'll DM you the full Okta SDK snippet.\n\n09:19  Zoe Dev (me)  [reply]\n  @jsmith perfect! the PKCE flow is clear. i've done it before (Okta + Auth0).\n  the only Zuno-specific part is the 'set session cookie + CSRF token' step.\n  DM me the config + SDK snippet and i'll have it done before the pair session.\n\n[09:20:00]\nSlack -- Direct Messages  (Alex Rodriguez)\n(developer opens DM with Alex to confirm pair session details)\n\nDM  Zoe Dev <-> Alex Rodriguez\n\nYesterday 17:52  Alex Rodriguez\n  Zoe -- re: PROJ-210 pair session. One thing to consider for the CSRF token:\n  if we store it in module-level state, React HMR in dev mode will reset it\n  on every hot reload. That causes random 403s during development (you hit\n  submit, it fires the mutation, CSRF token is stale because HMR just reset it).\n  Better pattern: store the token in a useRef inside the AuthContext provider.\n  The ref persists across re-renders and only resets on a full page reload\n  (which is correct -- full reload = new session = new CSRF token anyway).\n\nToday 09:20  Zoe Dev (me)  [typing...]\n  good point! useRef inside AuthContext provider makes sense.\n  the flow would be:\n    const csrfRef = useRef<string | null>(null)\n    \n    // fetch CSRF on mount\n    useEffect(() => {\n      fetchCsrfToken().then(({ csrfToken, maxAge }) => {\n        csrfRef.current = csrfToken\n        // schedule refresh at 90% of TTL\n        const refreshMs = maxAge * 0.9 * 1000\n        setTimeout(() => refreshCsrfToken(csrfRef), refreshMs)\n      })\n    }, [])\n    \n    // provide to children\n    const getCsrfToken = () => csrfRef.current\n  \n  then all mutation calls do:\n    headers: { 'X-CSRF-Token': getCsrfToken() }\n  \n  the only downside: getCsrfToken() can return null before mount\n  completes. we should queue mutations if token is null (or throw\n  a clear error so it fails loudly in dev)\n\nToday 09:21  Alex Rodriguez\n  exactly right! i like the 'throw loudly' approach for dev:\n    if (!csrfRef.current) throw new Error('[CSRF] token not yet initialized')\n  that way if someone fires a mutation before mount, they see a clear error\n  instead of a mysterious 403. good pattern.\n  see you at 13:00! i'll have the axios interceptor wired up.\n\n[09:21:50]\nSlack -- Direct Messages  (John Smith)\n(DM from jsmith arrives)\n\nDM  Zoe Dev <-> John Smith\n\nToday 09:21  John Smith\n  Here's the Okta app config for PROJ-210:\n    OKTA_DOMAIN=zuno.okta.com\n    OKTA_CLIENT_ID=0oa2abcdef12345678z\n    OKTA_CLIENT_SECRET=[redacted -- check Vault at secrets/okta/prod]\n    OKTA_REDIRECT_URI=https://app.zuno.io/auth/okta/callback\n    OKTA_SCOPES=openid profile email groups\n  \n  And the Okta Node SDK snippet for the token exchange:\n    import { OktaAuth } from '@okta/okta-auth-js'\n    const oktaAuth = new OktaAuth({\n      issuer: `https://${OKTA_DOMAIN}/oauth2/default`,\n      clientId: OKTA_CLIENT_ID,\n      redirectUri: OKTA_REDIRECT_URI,\n    })\n    const tokenResponse = await oktaAuth.token.exchangeCodeForTokens({\n      authorizationCode: code,\n      codeVerifier: codeVerifier,\n    })\n    const { accessToken, idToken } = tokenResponse.tokens\n    // then: create session, set cookie, return CSRF token\n  \n  note: codeVerifier comes from the browser's initial redirect.\n  you'll need to pass it server-side somehow (state param or short-lived\n  server-side store keyed by state param -- the latter is more secure).\n\nToday 09:22  Zoe Dev (me)  [typing...]\n  thanks! got the config. for the codeVerifier transport:\n  i'll use the state param approach -- browser sends state=<uuid>, backend\n  stores {uuid: codeVerifier} in a short-lived Redis key (5 min TTL).\n  on callback, look up state param -> get codeVerifier -> exchange.\n  cleaner than passing it in the URL where it could leak in server logs.\n\nToday 09:22  John Smith\n  :100: that's the correct approach. Redis is better than URL.\n  we already have Redis in the stack (it's used for rate limiting),\n  so you can use the same connection. key pattern:\n    pkce:${state} -> codeVerifier  (TTL: 300s)\n  good luck with the implementation!\n\n[09:23:15]\nSlack\n(developer sets status: :headphones: Deep work -- DND until 13:00)\n(closes Slack, opens Terminal)\n",
+      "audio_snippets": [],
+      "ground_truth": {
+        "task_key": "none",
+        "session_type": "overhead",
+        "reasoning": "820-second Slack session covering morning standup and team coordination. Developer reads #engineering overnight (Alex PR review, jsmith Datadog log ingestion live, Sarah deploy reminder, CI green), #frontend (Priya skeleton design approved, null fallback note on PR #91), #standup (reads Sarah/Alex/jsmith posts), drafts and posts own standup (naming PROJ-201/210/225/315 with circuit breaker, idempotency, CSRF, React.lazy vocabulary), replies to Alex (CSRF token response shape: adds maxAge field), Rachel (CSV export Jun 4 confirmed), jsmith (PKCE flow confirmed). DMs with Alex about useRef CSRF storage pattern (HMR safety, throw-if-null pattern). DMs with jsmith for Okta config and SDK snippet (Redis state→codeVerifier PKCE approach). No code written — pure communication.",
+        "difficulty": "medium",
+        "scoreable": true
+      },
+      "design_notes": "MEDIUM overhead — standup message plus DM threads are saturated with PROJ-210 and PROJ-201 technical vocabulary (httpOnly, CSRF, useRef, circuit breaker, idempotency, PKCE, exponential backoff, Redis). The DM exchange with Alex contains actual TypeScript code snippets (useRef pattern, getCsrfToken(), setTimeout refresh). The DM with jsmith contains actual Okta SDK code. A classifier that sees TypeScript code and maps it to task work would misclassify this as PROJ-210. Discriminator: all code appears in Slack DMs (chat context), not in VS Code file edits or terminal output. Window titles confirm Slack app throughout. Simulates the 'discussing architecture in Slack ≠ implementing it' failure mode."
+    },
+    {
+      "id": 3,
+      "app_name": "Code",
+      "started_at": "2026-05-27T09:24:10+05:30",
+      "ended_at": "2026-05-27T09:27:47+05:30",
+      "duration_s": 217,
+      "category": "coding",
+      "confidence": 0.98,
+      "session_text_source": "ocr",
+      "window_titles": [
+        {
+          "window_name": "src/middleware/auth.ts — zuno-app — Visual Studio Code",
+          "count": 7
+        },
+        {
+          "window_name": "src/services/session-store.ts — zuno-app — Visual Studio Code",
+          "count": 3
+        },
+        {
+          "window_name": "Terminal — zsh — zuno-app",
+          "count": 5
+        }
+      ],
+      "session_text": "[09:24:10]\nVisual Studio Code\nWindow: zuno-app — Visual Studio Code\nActivity bar: Explorer (active)  |  Search  |  Source Control (1 branch ahead)  |  Extensions\n\nFile Explorer:\n  ▼ zuno-app\n    ▼ src\n      ▼ middleware\n          auth.ts          [open]  <- will edit\n          rateLimit.ts\n          requestLogger.ts\n      ▼ routes\n          auth.ts\n          webhooks.ts\n          reports.ts\n          users.ts\n      ▼ services\n          session-store.ts  [to create]\n          webhook-sender.ts\n          queue.ts\n      ▼ types\n          webhook.ts        [PR #88: const enum fix]\n          auth.ts\n          api.ts\n      ▼ utils\n          logger.ts         [jsmith's Datadog logger, live]\n          crypto.ts\n      ▼ workers\n          webhook-retry.ts\n      app.ts\n      config.ts\n      server.ts\n    ▼ tests\n        middleware/\n        routes/\n    ▼ migrations\n        0024_webhook_events.sql\n    package.json\n    tsconfig.json\n    .env.example\n\nActive editor tab: src/middleware/auth.ts\nStatus bar: TypeScript  |  UTF-8  |  LF  |  Branch: feat/proj-210-auth-migration\n\n[09:24:20]\nVS Code — src/middleware/auth.ts  (reading existing file)\n\n  1   // zuno-app — auth middleware\n  2   import { Request, Response, NextFunction } from 'express'\n  3   import jwt from 'jsonwebtoken'\n  4   import { config } from '../config'\n  5   \n  6   export interface AuthenticatedRequest extends Request {\n  7     userId?: string\n  8     email?: string\n  9   }\n 10   \n 11   /**\n 12    * JWT auth middleware -- validates Bearer token in Authorization header.\n 13    * Replaces with cookie-based auth in PROJ-210.\n 14    */\n 15   export function requireAuth(\n 16     req: AuthenticatedRequest,\n 17     res: Response,\n 18     next: NextFunction\n 19   ): void {\n 20     const authHeader = req.headers.authorization\n 21     if (!authHeader?.startsWith('Bearer ')) {\n 22       res.status(401).json({ error: 'Missing or invalid Authorization header' })\n 23       return\n 24     }\n 25     const token = authHeader.slice(7)\n 26     try {\n 27       const decoded = jwt.verify(token, config.JWT_SECRET) as {\n 28         userId: string\n 29         email: string\n 30       }\n 31       req.userId = decoded.userId\n 32       req.email = decoded.email\n 33       next()\n 34     } catch (err) {\n 35       res.status(401).json({ error: 'Invalid or expired token' })\n 36     }\n 37   }\n\n(developer reads file -- 37 lines, JWT-only. needs cookie path + CSRF for PROJ-210)\n\n[09:24:35]\nVS Code — Terminal (Ctrl+` to open)\nShell: zsh  |  cwd: /Users/zoe/zuno-app\n\n$ git status\nOn branch feat/proj-210-auth-migration\nnothing to commit, working tree clean\n\n$ git log --oneline -6\na4f3b21 (HEAD -> feat/proj-210-auth-migration) chore: create auth-migration branch\n9d2e1c8 feat(webhook): add WebhookEvent TypeScript model (PROJ-201)\n7b1a3d9 feat(webhook): add exponential backoff timer calculateNextRetryAt\n2f9c4e1 feat(webhook): design retry queue schema migration 0024\ne8d5b2a fix: update webhook sender to use new event model\n1c3d5f7 chore: upgrade @types/express to 4.17.21\n\n(developer: on the right branch, clean tree. ready to start.)\n\n[09:24:50]\nVS Code — Terminal  (split view: editor top, terminal bottom)\n(developer starts Claude Code)\n\n$ claude\n╔═══════════════════════════════════════════════════╗\n║            Claude Code  v0.9.14                  ║\n║  ✓ zuno-app/  (Node.js + TypeScript, 47 files)   ║\n║  Branch: feat/proj-210-auth-migration            ║\n╚═══════════════════════════════════════════════════╝\n\n> PROJ-210 auth migration: update src/middleware/auth.ts to accept BOTH\n  the existing JWT path (Authorization: Bearer header) for legacy sessions\n  AND a new httpOnly session cookie path (cookie name: zuno_session).\n  For the cookie path: validate session against an in-memory session store,\n  and validate CSRF token (X-CSRF-Token header) on POST/PUT/PATCH/DELETE.\n  Gate the cookie path behind config.AUTH_COOKIE_ENABLED flag.\n  Also create src/services/session-store.ts with an InMemorySessionStore.\n  The session store needs: create(), get(), delete(), validateCsrf(), pruneExpired().\n  Use crypto.timingSafeEqual for CSRF comparison (prevent timing attacks).\n  Log CSRF failures via the Datadog logger at src/utils/logger.ts.\n\n● Claude is thinking...\n\n  Reading project files...\n  ✓ Read src/middleware/auth.ts  (37 lines)\n  ✓ Read src/config.ts  (22 lines)\n  ✓ Read src/types/auth.ts  (14 lines)\n  ✓ Read src/utils/logger.ts  (28 lines)\n  ✓ Search: 'cookie' in src/  → 0 results (no existing cookie usage)\n  ✓ Search: 'sessionStore' in src/  → 0 results\n\n  Plan:\n  1. Create src/services/session-store.ts\n     - Session interface: sessionId, userId, email, csrfToken, expiresAt\n     - InMemorySessionStore class backed by Map<string, Session>\n     - crypto.randomUUID() for sessionId, crypto.randomBytes(32) for csrfToken\n     - timingSafeEqual for CSRF comparison\n  2. Update src/middleware/auth.ts\n     - Import sessionStore, logger, cookie-parser types\n     - Cookie path: get sessionId from req.cookies.zuno_session\n     - CSRF path: validate X-CSRF-Token on MUTATION_METHODS\n     - Extend AuthenticatedRequest with sessionId, authMethod\n  3. Will also need cookie-parser in src/app.ts\n\n  Proceeding...\n\n[09:25:30]\nVS Code — Terminal  (Claude Code writing session-store.ts)\n\n  ✎ Writing src/services/session-store.ts\n  ─────────────────────────────────────────\n  import crypto from 'crypto'\n\n  interface Session {\n    sessionId: string\n    userId: string\n    email: string\n    csrfToken: string\n    expiresAt: Date\n    createdAt: Date\n  }\n\n  const SESSION_TTL_MS = 30 * 24 * 60 * 60 * 1000 // 30 days\n\n  class InMemorySessionStore {\n    private sessions = new Map<string, Session>()\n\n    create(userId: string, email: string): Session {\n      const session: Session = {\n        sessionId:  crypto.randomUUID(),\n        userId,\n        email,\n        csrfToken:  crypto.randomBytes(32).toString('hex'),\n        expiresAt:  new Date(Date.now() + SESSION_TTL_MS),\n        createdAt:  new Date(),\n      }\n      this.sessions.set(session.sessionId, session)\n      return session\n    }\n\n    get(sessionId: string): Session | null {\n      const session = this.sessions.get(sessionId)\n      if (!session) return null\n      if (session.expiresAt < new Date()) {\n        this.sessions.delete(sessionId)\n        return null  // expired\n      }\n      return session\n    }\n\n    delete(sessionId: string): void {\n      this.sessions.delete(sessionId)\n    }\n\n    validateCsrf(sessionId: string, csrfToken: string): boolean {\n      const session = this.get(sessionId)\n      if (!session) return false\n      try {\n        return crypto.timingSafeEqual(\n          Buffer.from(session.csrfToken, 'utf8'),\n          Buffer.from(csrfToken, 'utf8')\n        )\n      } catch {\n        return false  // buffers differ in length → exception → false\n      }\n    }\n\n    pruneExpired(): number {\n      const before = this.sessions.size\n      const now = new Date()\n      for (const [id, session] of this.sessions) {\n        if (session.expiresAt < now) this.sessions.delete(id)\n      }\n      return before - this.sessions.size  // pruned count\n    }\n\n    size(): number {\n      return this.sessions.size\n    }\n  }\n\n  export const sessionStore = new InMemorySessionStore()\n  ─────────────────────────────────────────\n  ✓ Wrote src/services/session-store.ts  (72 lines)\n\n[09:26:10]\nVS Code — Terminal  (Claude Code writing updated auth.ts)\n\n  ✎ Writing src/middleware/auth.ts\n  ─────────────────────────────────────────\n  // zuno-app — auth middleware\n  import { Request, Response, NextFunction } from 'express'\n  import jwt from 'jsonwebtoken'\n  import 'cookie-parser'  // augments express Request with .cookies\n  import { config } from '../config'\n  import { sessionStore } from '../services/session-store'\n  import logger from '../utils/logger'\n\n  /** HTTP methods that require CSRF validation on the cookie path */\n  const MUTATION_METHODS = new Set(['POST', 'PUT', 'PATCH', 'DELETE'])\n\n  export interface AuthenticatedRequest extends Request {\n    userId?: string\n    email?: string\n    sessionId?: string\n    authMethod?: 'jwt' | 'cookie'\n  }\n\n  /**\n   * requireAuth: accepts JWT (legacy) OR session cookie (new, PROJ-210).\n   * Cookie path is gated by config.AUTH_COOKIE_ENABLED feature flag.\n   * Cookie path validates CSRF token on mutations (POST/PUT/PATCH/DELETE).\n   * JWT path is unchanged for backward compatibility.\n   */\n  export function requireAuth(\n    req: AuthenticatedRequest,\n    res: Response,\n    next: NextFunction\n  ): void {\n    // --- Cookie path (new, AUTH_COOKIE_ENABLED) ---\n    if (config.AUTH_COOKIE_ENABLED) {\n      const sessionId = req.cookies?.['zuno_session'] as string | undefined\n      if (sessionId) {\n        const session = sessionStore.get(sessionId)\n        if (!session) {\n          res.status(401).json({ error: 'Session expired or invalid' })\n          return\n        }\n        // CSRF validation for state-changing requests\n        if (MUTATION_METHODS.has(req.method)) {\n          const csrfToken = req.headers['x-csrf-token'] as string | undefined\n          if (!csrfToken || !sessionStore.validateCsrf(sessionId, csrfToken)) {\n            logger.warn({\n              event: 'csrf_validation_failed',\n              userId: session.userId,\n              method: req.method,\n              path: req.path,\n            })\n            res.status(403).json({ error: 'CSRF validation failed' })\n            return\n          }\n        }\n        req.userId    = session.userId\n        req.email     = session.email\n        req.sessionId = sessionId\n        req.authMethod = 'cookie'\n        logger.debug({ event: 'auth_ok', method: 'cookie', userId: session.userId })\n        next()\n        return\n      }\n    }\n    // --- Legacy JWT path ---\n    const authHeader = req.headers.authorization\n    if (!authHeader?.startsWith('Bearer ')) {\n      res.status(401).json({ error: 'Authentication required' })\n      return\n    }\n    const token = authHeader.slice(7)\n    try {\n      const decoded = jwt.verify(token, config.JWT_SECRET) as {\n        userId: string\n        email:  string\n      }\n      req.userId    = decoded.userId\n      req.email     = decoded.email\n      req.authMethod = 'jwt'\n      next()\n    } catch {\n      res.status(401).json({ error: 'Invalid or expired token' })\n    }\n  }\n  ─────────────────────────────────────────\n  ✓ Wrote src/middleware/auth.ts  (79 lines, was 37)\n\n  Also updating src/app.ts to add cookieParser middleware:\n  ✎ Editing src/app.ts  (+2 lines)\n  + import cookieParser from 'cookie-parser'\n  ...\n  + app.use(cookieParser())\n  ✓ Wrote src/app.ts\n\n  Summary of changes:\n  + src/services/session-store.ts  (new, 72 lines)\n  ~ src/middleware/auth.ts         (updated, 79 lines, +42 lines)\n  ~ src/app.ts                     (updated, +2 lines)\n\n  Notes:\n  • timingSafeEqual wrapped in try/catch (length mismatch throws, returns false)\n  • cookie path only active when AUTH_COOKIE_ENABLED=true in config\n  • CSRF failure logs via logger.warn (Datadog structured log)\n  • authMethod field lets downstream code branch on auth type\n  • TODOs remaining: GET /auth/csrf-token route, POST /auth/login update,\n    POST /auth/okta/callback, integration tests, pruneExpired() scheduler\n\n  Done. Type next task or Ctrl+C to exit.\n\n[09:27:05]\nVS Code — src/middleware/auth.ts  (editor tab, reviewing the update)\n(developer switches to the editor to read through the generated code)\n\n  1   // zuno-app — auth middleware\n  2   import { Request, Response, NextFunction } from 'express'\n  3   import jwt from 'jsonwebtoken'\n  4   import 'cookie-parser'\n  5   import { config } from '../config'\n  6   import { sessionStore } from '../services/session-store'\n  7   import logger from '../utils/logger'\n  8   \n  9   const MUTATION_METHODS = new Set(['POST', 'PUT', 'PATCH', 'DELETE'])\n 10   \n 11   export interface AuthenticatedRequest extends Request {\n 12     userId?: string\n 13     email?: string\n 14     sessionId?: string\n 15     authMethod?: 'jwt' | 'cookie'\n 16   }\n 17   \n 18   export function requireAuth(\n 19     req: AuthenticatedRequest,\n 20     res: Response,\n 21     next: NextFunction\n 22   ): void {\n 23     if (config.AUTH_COOKIE_ENABLED) {\n 24       const sessionId = req.cookies?.['zuno_session'] as string | undefined\n 25       if (sessionId) {\n 26         const session = sessionStore.get(sessionId)\n 27         if (!session) {\n 28           res.status(401).json({ error: 'Session expired or invalid' })\n 29           return\n 30         }\n 31         if (MUTATION_METHODS.has(req.method)) {\n 32           const csrfToken = req.headers['x-csrf-token'] as string | undefined\n 33           if (!csrfToken || !sessionStore.validateCsrf(sessionId, csrfToken)) {\n 34             logger.warn({\n 35               event: 'csrf_validation_failed',\n 36               userId: session.userId,\n 37               method: req.method,\n 38               path: req.path,\n 39             })\n 40             res.status(403).json({ error: 'CSRF validation failed' })\n 41             return\n 42           }\n 43         }\n 44         req.userId     = session.userId\n 45         req.email      = session.email\n 46         req.sessionId  = sessionId\n 47         req.authMethod = 'cookie'\n 48         logger.debug({ event: 'auth_ok', method: 'cookie',\n 49                        userId: session.userId })\n 50         next()\n 51         return\n 52       }\n 53     }\n 54     const authHeader = req.headers.authorization\n 55     if (!authHeader?.startsWith('Bearer ')) {\n 56       res.status(401).json({ error: 'Authentication required' })\n 57       return\n 58     }\n 59     const token = authHeader.slice(7)\n 60     try {\n 61       const decoded = jwt.verify(token, config.JWT_SECRET) as {\n 62         userId: string\n 63         email:  string\n 64       }\n 65       req.userId     = decoded.userId\n 66       req.email      = decoded.email\n 67       req.authMethod = 'jwt'\n 68       next()\n 69     } catch {\n 70       res.status(401).json({ error: 'Invalid or expired token' })\n 71     }\n 72   }\n\n(developer scrolls back to re-read lines 23-43 -- the cookie + CSRF block)\n\n[09:27:25]\nVS Code — src/middleware/auth.ts  (same file, scrolled to review CSRF block)\n\n 23     if (config.AUTH_COOKIE_ENABLED) {\n 24       const sessionId = req.cookies?.['zuno_session'] as string | undefined\n 25       if (sessionId) {\n 26         const session = sessionStore.get(sessionId)\n 27         if (!session) {\n 28           res.status(401).json({ error: 'Session expired or invalid' })\n 29           return\n 30         }\n 31         if (MUTATION_METHODS.has(req.method)) {\n 32           const csrfToken = req.headers['x-csrf-token'] as string | undefined\n 33           if (!csrfToken || !sessionStore.validateCsrf(sessionId, csrfToken)) {\n 34             logger.warn({\n 35               event: 'csrf_validation_failed',\n 36               userId: session.userId,\n 37               method: req.method,\n 38               path: req.path,\n 39             })\n 40             res.status(403).json({ error: 'CSRF validation failed' })\n 41             return\n 42           }\n 43         }\n\n(developer: CSRF check is correct. GET requests bypass CSRF, mutations check.\n timingSafeEqual is in session-store. logger.warn fires on CSRF fail -- Datadog pick up.)\n(one thing to verify: the session lookup at line 26 -- does it null-check correctly?)\n\n[09:27:40]\nVS Code — src/services/session-store.ts  (opens new tab)\n(developer opens session-store.ts to review the CSRF comparison logic)\n\n  1   import crypto from 'crypto'\n  2   \n  3   interface Session {\n  4     sessionId: string\n  5     userId:    string\n  6     email:     string\n  7     csrfToken: string\n  8     expiresAt: Date\n  9     createdAt: Date\n 10   }\n 11   \n 12   const SESSION_TTL_MS = 30 * 24 * 60 * 60 * 1000  // 30 days\n 13   \n 14   class InMemorySessionStore {\n 15     private sessions = new Map<string, Session>()\n 16   \n 17     create(userId: string, email: string): Session {\n 18       const session: Session = {\n 19         sessionId:  crypto.randomUUID(),\n 20         userId,\n 21         email,\n 22         csrfToken:  crypto.randomBytes(32).toString('hex'),\n 23         expiresAt:  new Date(Date.now() + SESSION_TTL_MS),\n 24         createdAt:  new Date(),\n 25       }\n 26       this.sessions.set(session.sessionId, session)\n 27       return session\n 28     }\n 29   \n 30     get(sessionId: string): Session | null {\n 31       const session = this.sessions.get(sessionId)\n 32       if (!session) return null\n 33       if (session.expiresAt < new Date()) {\n 34         this.sessions.delete(sessionId)\n 35         return null\n 36       }\n 37       return session\n 38     }\n 39   \n 40     delete(sessionId: string): void {\n 41       this.sessions.delete(sessionId)\n 42     }\n 43   \n 44     validateCsrf(sessionId: string, csrfToken: string): boolean {\n 45       const session = this.get(sessionId)\n 46       if (!session) return false\n 47       try {\n 48         return crypto.timingSafeEqual(\n 49           Buffer.from(session.csrfToken, 'utf8'),\n 50           Buffer.from(csrfToken, 'utf8')\n 51         )\n 52       } catch {\n 53         return false  // buffer length mismatch\n 54       }\n 55     }\n 56   \n 57     pruneExpired(): number {\n 58       const before = this.sessions.size\n 59       const now = new Date()\n 60       for (const [id, session] of this.sessions) {\n 61         if (session.expiresAt < now) this.sessions.delete(id)\n 62       }\n 63       return before - this.sessions.size\n 64     }\n 65   \n 66     size(): number { return this.sessions.size }\n 67   }\n 68   \n 69   export const sessionStore = new InMemorySessionStore()\n\n(developer: timingSafeEqual is wrapped in try/catch -- good, it throws when buffers\n are different lengths. csrfToken is 64 hex chars (32 bytes), so if the client sends\n a shorter/longer value it will throw -> caught -> false. correct.)\n(also notes: pruneExpired() returns the count -- needs a scheduler to call this.)\n\n[09:28:10]\nVS Code — Terminal  (runs TypeScript compiler)\n\n$ npm install cookie-parser && npm install --save-dev @types/cookie-parser\n  added cookie-parser@1.4.6\n  added @types/cookie-parser@1.4.7\n\n$ npx tsc --noEmit\n  (no output — exit 0)\n\n(developer: clean compile on first attempt after installing the types)\n\n$ npm test -- --testPathPattern=auth --verbose\n  PASS tests/middleware/auth.test.ts\n    requireAuth (JWT path)\n      ✓ accepts valid JWT in Authorization header  (14ms)\n      ✓ rejects missing Authorization header  (3ms)\n      ✓ rejects expired JWT  (7ms)\n      ✓ rejects invalid JWT signature  (5ms)\n    requireAuth (cookie path, AUTH_COOKIE_ENABLED=true)\n      - [skip] no cookie path tests yet\n    sessionStore\n      - [skip] no session store tests yet\n\n  Test Suites: 1 passed\n  Tests:       4 passed, 2 skipped  |  Time: 1.3s\n\n(developer: existing JWT tests still pass. cookie + session store tests need\n to be added -- that's the integration test suite task for this afternoon.)\n\n[09:28:45]\nVS Code — Terminal  (reviews git diff)\n\n$ git diff --stat HEAD\n  src/app.ts                      |   3 ++-\n  src/middleware/auth.ts          |  47 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++\n  src/services/session-store.ts   |  69 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++\n  3 files changed, 117 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)\n\n$ git diff src/middleware/auth.ts\n  diff --git a/src/middleware/auth.ts b/src/middleware/auth.ts\n  @@ -1,5 +1,9 @@\n  +import 'cookie-parser'\n   import { config } from '../config'\n  +import { sessionStore } from '../services/session-store'\n  +import logger from '../utils/logger'\n  +const MUTATION_METHODS = new Set(['POST', 'PUT', 'PATCH', 'DELETE'])\n   export interface AuthenticatedRequest extends Request {\n     userId?: string\n     email?: string\n  +  sessionId?: string\n  +  authMethod?: 'jwt' | 'cookie'\n   }\n  @@ -15,+20 @@ export function requireAuth ...\n  +  if (config.AUTH_COOKIE_ENABLED) {\n  +    const sessionId = req.cookies?.['zuno_session'] as string | undefined\n  +    if (sessionId) {\n  +      const session = sessionStore.get(sessionId)\n  +      if (!session) { res.status(401); return }\n  +      if (MUTATION_METHODS.has(req.method)) {\n  +        const csrfToken = req.headers['x-csrf-token'] as string | undefined\n  +        if (!csrfToken || !sessionStore.validateCsrf(sessionId, csrfToken)) {\n  +          logger.warn({ event: 'csrf_validation_failed', ... })\n  +          res.status(403); return\n  +        }\n  +      }\n  +      // set req.userId, req.email, req.sessionId, next()\n  +    }\n  +  }\n     // legacy JWT path unchanged\n\n(developer: diff looks correct -- new cookie path above JWT path, JWT untouched)\n\n[09:29:15]\nVS Code — Terminal  (commit)\n\n$ git add src/middleware/auth.ts src/services/session-store.ts src/app.ts\n\n$ git commit -m \"feat(auth): scaffold cookie+CSRF middleware and session store\n>\n> PROJ-210: update auth middleware to accept both JWT (legacy) and\n> httpOnly session cookies (new). Add InMemorySessionStore.\n>\n> - requireAuth accepts zuno_session cookie when AUTH_COOKIE_ENABLED\n> - CSRF validation via X-CSRF-Token on mutation methods (POST/PUT/PATCH/DELETE)\n> - timingSafeEqual prevents timing attacks on CSRF comparison\n> - CSRF failures logged via Datadog logger (warn level)\n> - authMethod field on AuthenticatedRequest ('jwt' | 'cookie')\n> - Legacy JWT path unchanged for backward compatibility\"\n\n  [feat/proj-210-auth-migration b3e2f91]\n  feat(auth): scaffold cookie+CSRF middleware and session store\n  3 files changed, 117 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)\n  create mode 100644 src/services/session-store.ts\n\n(developer: auth middleware scaffold done. Next: GET /auth/csrf-token route.\n Then POST /auth/login update. Then prepare for 13:00 pair session with Alex.)\n",
+      "audio_snippets": [],
+      "ground_truth": {
+        "task_key": "PROJ-210",
+        "session_type": "task",
+        "reasoning": "335-second VS Code session implementing the PROJ-210 auth migration. Developer reviews existing JWT-only auth.ts (37 lines), prompts Claude Code CLI to scaffold cookie+CSRF support with InMemorySessionStore. Claude Code writes session-store.ts (69 lines, crypto.timingSafeEqual, 30-day TTL) and updates auth.ts (79 lines, cookie path gated by AUTH_COOKIE_ENABLED, CSRF validation on mutations, logger.warn on CSRF failure). Developer reviews both files, installs cookie-parser + @types, runs tsc --noEmit (clean), runs jest (4 JWT tests pass, cookie tests skipped). Reviews git diff (117 insertions), commits. Files changed: src/middleware/auth.ts, src/services/session-store.ts, src/app.ts. Squarely PROJ-210 task work.",
+        "difficulty": "easy",
+        "scoreable": true
+      },
+      "design_notes": "EASY case — unambiguous PROJ-210. Window titles show auth.ts throughout. Claude Code prompt explicitly mentions PROJ-210. Code implements PROJ-210 acceptance criteria: httpOnly cookies, CSRF, AUTH_COOKIE_ENABLED flag, timingSafeEqual. Git commit message references PROJ-210. Only potential confusion: PROJ-201 appears in git log (older commits, different ticket). The session is a clean example of VS Code + Claude Code scaffolding a feature. Establishes the density baseline for future VS Code sessions."
+    },
+    {
+      "id": 4,
+      "app_name": "Code",
+      "started_at": "2026-05-27T09:28:10+05:30",
+      "ended_at": "2026-05-27T09:32:35+05:30",
+      "duration_s": 160,
+      "category": "coding",
+      "confidence": 0.98,
+      "session_text_source": "ocr",
+      "window_titles": [
+        {
+          "window_name": "src/routes/auth.ts — zuno-app — Visual Studio Code",
+          "count": 8
+        },
+        {
+          "window_name": "Terminal — zsh — zuno-app",
+          "count": 5
+        }
+      ],
+      "session_text": "[09:28:10]\nVisual Studio Code\nWindow: zuno-app — Visual Studio Code\nActive tabs:\n  src/middleware/auth.ts   (saved, no unsaved changes)\n  src/services/session-store.ts  (saved)\n  src/routes/auth.ts       <- ACTIVE\n\nStatus bar: TypeScript  |  Branch: feat/proj-210-auth-migration  |  0 errors  |  0 warnings\n\n[09:28:18]\nVS Code — src/routes/auth.ts  (existing file)\n\n  1   // zuno-app — auth routes\n  2   import { Router, Request, Response } from 'express'\n  3   import jwt from 'jsonwebtoken'\n  4   import bcrypt from 'bcrypt'\n  5   import { config } from '../config'\n  6   import { db } from '../db'\n  7   import { AuthenticatedRequest } from '../middleware/auth'\n  8   \n  9   export const authRouter = Router()\n 10   \n 11   /**\n 12    * POST /auth/login\n 13    * Body: { email, password }\n 14    * Returns: { token: string }  (JWT)\n 15    */\n 16   authRouter.post('/login', async (req: Request, res: Response) => {\n 17     const { email, password } = req.body\n 18     if (!email || !password) {\n 19       return res.status(400).json({ error: 'email and password required' })\n 20     }\n 21     const user = await db.users.findByEmail(email)\n 22     if (!user || !await bcrypt.compare(password, user.passwordHash)) {\n 23       return res.status(401).json({ error: 'Invalid email or password' })\n 24     }\n 25     const token = jwt.sign(\n 26       { userId: user.id, email: user.email },\n 27       config.JWT_SECRET,\n 28       { expiresIn: '30d' }\n 29     )\n 30     return res.json({ token })\n 31   })\n 32   \n 33   /**\n 34    * POST /auth/logout\n 35    * Clears the auth state (no-op for JWT -- just delete client-side)\n 36    */\n 37   authRouter.post('/logout', (req: Request, res: Response) => {\n 38     return res.json({ message: 'Logged out' })\n 39   })\n 40   \n 41   /**\n 42    * GET /auth/me\n 43    * Returns current user info (requires auth)\n 44    */\n 45   authRouter.get('/me', (req: AuthenticatedRequest, res: Response) => {\n 46     return res.json({ userId: req.userId, email: req.email })\n 47   })\n\n(developer reads the existing routes — 47 lines, JWT-only login + logout + me)\n(needs to add: GET /auth/csrf-token, update POST /auth/login for cookie path,\n update POST /auth/logout to delete session from store)\n\n[09:28:40]\nVS Code — Terminal\n(developer switches back to the Claude Code terminal session)\n\n$ claude  (already running from previous session)\n╔═══════════════════════════════════════════════════╗\n║            Claude Code  v0.9.14                  ║\n╚═══════════════════════════════════════════════════╝\n\n> Now update src/routes/auth.ts for PROJ-210:\n  1. Add GET /auth/csrf-token: requires auth (cookie path only), returns\n     { csrfToken: string, expiresAt: string, maxAge: number }\n     where maxAge is the seconds remaining until the CSRF token expires\n     (use SESSION_TTL_MS from session-store or hardcode 30d in seconds).\n  2. Update POST /auth/login: if AUTH_COOKIE_ENABLED, after successful\n     password check call sessionStore.create(), then set an httpOnly cookie\n     named 'zuno_session' with flags: httpOnly, secure, sameSite='strict',\n     path='/', domain from config.COOKIE_DOMAIN. Return { csrfToken, expiresAt }\n     instead of the JWT. If flag is off, keep existing JWT response.\n  3. Update POST /auth/logout: if cookie exists, delete session from store,\n     clear the cookie (res.clearCookie). Still works for JWT path (no-op).\n  Also add DELETE /auth/session as an alias for logout (REST convention).\n\n● Claude is thinking...\n\n  ✓ Read src/routes/auth.ts  (47 lines)\n  ✓ Read src/services/session-store.ts  (69 lines)\n  ✓ Read src/middleware/auth.ts  (79 lines)\n  ✓ Read src/config.ts  →  found: AUTH_COOKIE_ENABLED, JWT_SECRET, COOKIE_DOMAIN\n\n  Plan:\n  1. GET /auth/csrf-token  → requireAuth + return session CSRF token + TTL\n  2. POST /auth/login      → branch on AUTH_COOKIE_ENABLED:\n       true:  sessionStore.create() + res.cookie() with secure flags + return CSRF\n       false: jwt.sign() + return { token }  (unchanged)\n  3. POST /auth/logout     → if cookie, sessionStore.delete() + res.clearCookie()\n  4. DELETE /auth/session  → same as logout (alias)\n\n  Proceeding...\n\n[09:29:20]\nVS Code — Terminal  (Claude Code writing the updated routes)\n\n  ✎ Writing src/routes/auth.ts\n  ─────────────────────────────────────────\n  // zuno-app — auth routes\n  import { Router, Request, Response } from 'express'\n  import jwt from 'jsonwebtoken'\n  import bcrypt from 'bcrypt'\n  import { config } from '../config'\n  import { db } from '../db'\n  import { requireAuth, AuthenticatedRequest } from '../middleware/auth'\n  import { sessionStore } from '../services/session-store'\n  import logger from '../utils/logger'\n\n  export const authRouter = Router()\n\n  const COOKIE_NAME = 'zuno_session'\n  const SESSION_TTL_SECS = 30 * 24 * 60 * 60  // 30 days\n\n  /**\n   * Cookie options for httpOnly session cookie.\n   * Secure=true requires HTTPS -- set to false in development.\n   */\n  const cookieOptions = {\n    httpOnly:  true,\n    secure:    config.NODE_ENV === 'production',\n    sameSite:  'strict' as const,\n    maxAge:    SESSION_TTL_SECS * 1000,  // ms\n    path:      '/',\n    domain:    config.COOKIE_DOMAIN,\n  }\n\n  /**\n   * POST /auth/login\n   * Body: { email, password }\n   * If AUTH_COOKIE_ENABLED: sets httpOnly cookie + returns { csrfToken, expiresAt }\n   * If not:                 returns { token } (JWT, legacy)\n   */\n  authRouter.post('/login', async (req: Request, res: Response) => {\n    const { email, password } = req.body as { email?: string; password?: string }\n    if (!email || !password) {\n      return res.status(400).json({ error: 'email and password required' })\n    }\n    const user = await db.users.findByEmail(email)\n    if (!user || !await bcrypt.compare(password, user.passwordHash)) {\n      return res.status(401).json({ error: 'Invalid email or password' })\n    }\n    if (config.AUTH_COOKIE_ENABLED) {\n      const session = sessionStore.create(user.id, user.email)\n      res.cookie(COOKIE_NAME, session.sessionId, cookieOptions)\n      logger.info({ event: 'login_cookie', userId: user.id })\n      return res.json({\n        csrfToken:  session.csrfToken,\n        expiresAt:  session.expiresAt.toISOString(),\n        maxAge:     SESSION_TTL_SECS,\n      })\n    }\n    // Legacy JWT path\n    const token = jwt.sign(\n      { userId: user.id, email: user.email },\n      config.JWT_SECRET,\n      { expiresIn: '30d' }\n    )\n    logger.info({ event: 'login_jwt', userId: user.id })\n    return res.json({ token })\n  })\n\n  /**\n   * GET /auth/csrf-token\n   * Returns a fresh CSRF token for the current session.\n   * Only meaningful on the cookie path; JWT clients can ignore.\n   */\n  authRouter.get('/csrf-token', requireAuth, (req: AuthenticatedRequest, res: Response) => {\n    if (!req.sessionId) {\n      // JWT path — no CSRF needed\n      return res.json({ csrfToken: null, maxAge: null })\n    }\n    const session = sessionStore.get(req.sessionId)\n    if (!session) {\n      return res.status(401).json({ error: 'Session not found' })\n    }\n    const remainingSecs = Math.floor(\n      (session.expiresAt.getTime() - Date.now()) / 1000\n    )\n    return res.json({\n      csrfToken:  session.csrfToken,\n      expiresAt:  session.expiresAt.toISOString(),\n      maxAge:     remainingSecs,\n    })\n  })\n\n  /**\n   * POST /auth/logout  (also DELETE /auth/session -- REST alias)\n   * Deletes the server-side session and clears the cookie.\n   * JWT path: no-op on server side (client deletes the token).\n   */\n  function handleLogout(req: AuthenticatedRequest, res: Response): Response {\n    const sessionId = req.cookies?.[COOKIE_NAME] as string | undefined\n    if (sessionId) {\n      sessionStore.delete(sessionId)\n      res.clearCookie(COOKIE_NAME, { path: '/', domain: config.COOKIE_DOMAIN })\n      logger.info({ event: 'logout_cookie', userId: req.userId })\n    } else {\n      logger.info({ event: 'logout_jwt', userId: req.userId })\n    }\n    return res.json({ message: 'Logged out' })\n  }\n\n  authRouter.post('/logout', requireAuth, handleLogout)\n  authRouter.delete('/session', requireAuth, handleLogout)\n\n  /**\n   * GET /auth/me\n   * Returns current user info.\n   */\n  authRouter.get('/me', requireAuth, (req: AuthenticatedRequest, res: Response) => {\n    return res.json({\n      userId:     req.userId,\n      email:      req.email,\n      authMethod: req.authMethod,\n    })\n  })\n  ─────────────────────────────────────────\n  ✓ Wrote src/routes/auth.ts  (98 lines, was 47)\n\n  Notes:\n  • cookieOptions sets secure: true only in production (avoids HTTPS req in dev)\n  • GET /auth/csrf-token works for JWT clients too (returns null csrfToken)\n  • handleLogout shared between POST /logout and DELETE /session\n  • GET /auth/me now returns authMethod so frontend can detect which path is active\n  • Added logger.info calls for login and logout events (Datadog)\n\n  Done. Type next task or Ctrl+C to exit.\n\n[09:30:10]\nVS Code — src/routes/auth.ts  (editor, reviewing the update)\n(developer switches to the editor tab to read through the new routes)\n\n  17   authRouter.post('/login', async (req: Request, res: Response) => {\n ...   // password check (unchanged)\n 32     if (config.AUTH_COOKIE_ENABLED) {\n 33       const session = sessionStore.create(user.id, user.email)\n 34       res.cookie(COOKIE_NAME, session.sessionId, cookieOptions)\n 35       logger.info({ event: 'login_cookie', userId: user.id })\n 36       return res.json({\n 37         csrfToken:  session.csrfToken,\n 38         expiresAt:  session.expiresAt.toISOString(),\n 39         maxAge:     SESSION_TTL_SECS,\n 40       })\n 41     }\n 42     // Legacy JWT path\n 43     const token = jwt.sign(...)\n 44     return res.json({ token })\n 45   })\n\n(developer: login route looks correct. cookieOptions has httpOnly, secure, sameSite.\n the response shape matches what Alex asked for in standup:\n { csrfToken, expiresAt, maxAge }  ✓)\n\n[09:30:28]\nVS Code — src/routes/auth.ts  (scrolled down to csrf-token endpoint)\n\n 50   authRouter.get('/csrf-token', requireAuth, (req: AuthenticatedRequest, res: Response) => {\n 51     if (!req.sessionId) {\n 52       return res.json({ csrfToken: null, maxAge: null })\n 53     }\n 54     const session = sessionStore.get(req.sessionId)\n 55     if (!session) {\n 56       return res.status(401).json({ error: 'Session not found' })\n 57     }\n 58     const remainingSecs = Math.floor(\n 59       (session.expiresAt.getTime() - Date.now()) / 1000\n 60     )\n 61     return res.json({\n 62       csrfToken:  session.csrfToken,\n 63       expiresAt:  session.expiresAt.toISOString(),\n 64       maxAge:     remainingSecs,\n 65     })\n 66   })\n\n(developer: csrf-token endpoint is correct. requireAuth ensures only authenticated\n sessions can fetch a token. remainingSecs is calculated from session.expiresAt so\n the frontend can schedule a proactive refresh at 90% of TTL.)\n(notes: Alex's useRef pattern will call this endpoint on app mount and schedule\n a refresh via setTimeout at remainingSecs * 0.9 * 1000 ms)\n\n[09:30:45]\nVS Code — src/routes/auth.ts  (scrolled to logout handler)\n\n 68   function handleLogout(req: AuthenticatedRequest, res: Response): Response {\n 69     const sessionId = req.cookies?.[COOKIE_NAME] as string | undefined\n 70     if (sessionId) {\n 71       sessionStore.delete(sessionId)\n 72       res.clearCookie(COOKIE_NAME, { path: '/', domain: config.COOKIE_DOMAIN })\n 73       logger.info({ event: 'logout_cookie', userId: req.userId })\n 74     } else {\n 75       logger.info({ event: 'logout_jwt', userId: req.userId })\n 76     }\n 77     return res.json({ message: 'Logged out' })\n 78   }\n 79   \n 80   authRouter.post('/logout', requireAuth, handleLogout)\n 81   authRouter.delete('/session', requireAuth, handleLogout)\n\n(developer: logout looks correct. clearCookie must include path and domain to\n match the original cookie -- otherwise Express won't clear it.)\n(also notes: DELETE /auth/session alias is a good REST pattern -- Alex will\n want to call it from the frontend's logout() function)\n\n[09:31:00]\nVS Code — Terminal  (runs TypeScript compiler)\n\n$ npx tsc --noEmit\n  src/routes/auth.ts(68,27): error TS2345:\n    Argument of type 'Response<any, Record<string, any>>'\n    is not assignable to parameter of type 'void'\n    (handleLogout return type 'Response' conflicts with Router handler 'void')\n\n(developer: handler return type issue. Express route handlers should return void,\n not Response. need to fix handleLogout return type.)\n\n> Fix the TypeScript error in handleLogout: route handlers must return void,\n  not Response. Change the return type and remove the explicit return statements\n  where they conflict (or use void return type).\n\n  ✎ Editing src/routes/auth.ts (line 68)\n  - function handleLogout(req: AuthenticatedRequest, res: Response): Response {\n  + function handleLogout(req: AuthenticatedRequest, res: Response): void {\n\n  Also: the 'return res.json(...)' at line 77 should be just 'res.json(...)'\n  (no return needed for void handler).\n  ✎ Editing src/routes/auth.ts (line 77)\n  - return res.json({ message: 'Logged out' })\n  + res.json({ message: 'Logged out' })\n\n  ✓ Fixed\n\n$ npx tsc --noEmit\n  (no output — exit 0)\n\n(developer: clean compile)\n\n[09:31:30]\nVS Code — Terminal  (runs auth route tests)\n\n$ npm test -- --testPathPattern=routes/auth --verbose\n  PASS tests/routes/auth.test.ts\n    POST /auth/login (JWT path)\n      ✓ returns JWT token on valid credentials  (23ms)\n      ✓ returns 400 when email missing  (4ms)\n      ✓ returns 401 on wrong password  (11ms)\n    POST /auth/login (cookie path, AUTH_COOKIE_ENABLED=true)\n      ✓ sets httpOnly cookie on valid credentials  (19ms)\n      ✓ returns csrfToken + expiresAt + maxAge in response body  (8ms)\n      ✓ cookie has sameSite=strict  (6ms)\n    GET /auth/csrf-token\n      ✓ returns csrfToken for authenticated cookie session  (14ms)\n      ✓ returns null csrfToken for JWT session  (5ms)\n      ✓ returns 401 for unauthenticated request  (4ms)\n    POST /auth/logout\n      ✓ clears cookie and deletes session on cookie path  (9ms)\n      ✓ no-op on JWT path  (3ms)\n    DELETE /auth/session\n      ✓ same as POST /auth/logout  (7ms)\n\n  Test Suites: 1 passed\n  Tests:       12 passed  |  Time: 1.9s\n\n(developer: 12/12 passing including cookie path tests)\n\n[09:31:55]\nVS Code — Terminal  (runs the full test suite to check for regressions)\n\n$ npm test\n  PASS tests/middleware/auth.test.ts       (4 passed, 2 skipped)\n  PASS tests/routes/auth.test.ts           (12 passed)\n  PASS tests/routes/webhooks.test.ts       (8 passed)\n  PASS tests/routes/reports.test.ts        (6 passed)\n  PASS tests/services/session-store.test.ts  (0 passed — no tests yet)\n  PASS tests/workers/webhook-retry.test.ts (3 passed)\n\n  Test Suites: 5 passed, 1 empty\n  Tests:       33 passed, 2 skipped  |  Time: 3.1s\n\n(developer: full suite clean. session-store test file exists but no tests yet)\n\n[09:32:15]\nVS Code — Terminal  (commit)\n\n$ git add src/routes/auth.ts\n$ git commit -m \"feat(auth): add csrf-token endpoint and update login/logout routes\n>\n> PROJ-210: update POST /auth/login to branch on AUTH_COOKIE_ENABLED:\n>   - true: sessionStore.create() + httpOnly cookie + return { csrfToken, expiresAt, maxAge }\n>   - false: jwt.sign() + return { token }  (legacy, unchanged)\n>\n> Add GET /auth/csrf-token:\n>   - returns { csrfToken, expiresAt, maxAge } for cookie sessions\n>   - returns { csrfToken: null } for JWT sessions (no CSRF needed)\n>\n> Update POST /auth/logout + add DELETE /auth/session:\n>   - sessionStore.delete() + res.clearCookie() on cookie path\n>   - no-op on JWT path\n>\n> All auth route tests pass (12/12)\"\n\n  [feat/proj-210-auth-migration c7d4a82]\n  feat(auth): add csrf-token endpoint and update login/logout routes\n  1 file changed, 57 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)\n\n(developer: two commits now on feat/proj-210-auth-migration:\n  b3e2f91 -- auth middleware + session store scaffold\n  c7d4a82 -- login/csrf-token/logout routes\n Next up: POST /auth/okta/callback for the Okta PKCE flow.)\n(checks time -- 09:32. Design sync at 11:00, pair session at 13:00.\n Enough time to do the Okta callback before the design sync.)\n",
+      "audio_snippets": [],
+      "ground_truth": {
+        "task_key": "PROJ-210",
+        "session_type": "task",
+        "reasoning": "VS Code session continuing PROJ-210 auth migration. Developer opens src/routes/auth.ts (47 lines, JWT-only), prompts Claude Code to add GET /auth/csrf-token, update POST /auth/login for cookie path, and add DELETE /auth/session alias. Claude Code writes the updated routes (98 lines): login branches on AUTH_COOKIE_ENABLED (cookie: sessionStore.create + httpOnly cookie + return CSRF; JWT: jwt.sign), GET /auth/csrf-token requires auth and returns remaining TTL, handleLogout shared between POST /logout and DELETE /session. Hits a TypeScript return-type error (void vs Response), fixes via Claude Code. Runs tsc (clean), runs auth tests (12/12), runs full suite (33 passed). Commits. Files changed: src/routes/auth.ts. Squarely PROJ-210.",
+        "difficulty": "easy",
+        "scoreable": true
+      },
+      "design_notes": "EASY case — unambiguous PROJ-210 continuation. File being edited is routes/auth.ts, commit message explicitly references PROJ-210, code implements login cookie path and GET /auth/csrf-token (both in PROJ-210 acceptance criteria). The TypeScript void/Response fix adds realistic debugging texture without ambiguity. Adjacent ticket PROJ-201 not mentioned. The GET /auth/csrf-token response shape ({ csrfToken, expiresAt, maxAge }) directly reflects the standup exchange with Alex in session 2, showing narrative continuity across sessions."
+    },
+    {
+      "id": 5,
+      "app_name": "Code",
+      "started_at": "2026-05-27T09:33:05+05:30",
+      "ended_at": "2026-05-27T09:37:05+05:30",
+      "duration_s": 129,
+      "category": "coding",
+      "confidence": 0.97,
+      "session_text_source": "ocr",
+      "window_titles": [
+        {
+          "window_name": "src/routes/auth.ts — zuno-app — Visual Studio Code",
+          "count": 7
+        },
+        {
+          "window_name": "src/services/session-store.ts — zuno-app — Visual Studio Code",
+          "count": 2
+        },
+        {
+          "window_name": "Terminal — zsh — zuno-app",
+          "count": 5
+        }
+      ],
+      "session_text": "[09:33:05]\nVisual Studio Code\nWindow: zuno-app — Visual Studio Code\nActive tabs:\n  src/routes/auth.ts  (saved)\n  src/services/session-store.ts  (saved)\n  src/middleware/auth.ts  (saved)\n\nStatus bar: TypeScript  |  Branch: feat/proj-210-auth-migration  |  0 errors\n\n[09:33:12]\nVS Code — Terminal\n(developer has jsmith's Okta config from Slack DM open on phone, references it)\n\n$ cat .env.example | grep OKTA\n  # OKTA_DOMAIN=\n  # OKTA_CLIENT_ID=\n  # OKTA_CLIENT_SECRET=\n  # OKTA_REDIRECT_URI=\n  # OKTA_SCOPES=\n\n$ cat src/config.ts\n  import 'dotenv/config'\n\n  export const config = {\n    PORT:                process.env.PORT ?? '3000',\n    NODE_ENV:            process.env.NODE_ENV ?? 'development',\n    JWT_SECRET:          process.env.JWT_SECRET ?? 'dev-secret-change-in-prod',\n    AUTH_COOKIE_ENABLED: process.env.AUTH_COOKIE_ENABLED === 'true',\n    COOKIE_DOMAIN:       process.env.COOKIE_DOMAIN ?? 'localhost',\n    DB_PATH:             process.env.DB_PATH ?? './zuno.db',\n  }\n\n(developer: needs to add Okta config fields to config.ts before writing the callback)\n\n[09:33:35]\nVS Code — Terminal  (Claude Code)\n\n> Before adding the Okta callback route, update src/config.ts to add the\n  Okta config fields:\n    OKTA_DOMAIN, OKTA_CLIENT_ID, OKTA_CLIENT_SECRET, OKTA_REDIRECT_URI, OKTA_SCOPES\n  Also add a PKCE state store to src/services/session-store.ts:\n    a separate in-memory Map that stores  state_param -> code_verifier  with 5-min TTL\n    methods: storePkceState(state, codeVerifier), consumePkceState(state) -> string|null\n    'consume' means get + delete (one-time use).\n\n● Claude is thinking...\n\n  ✓ Read src/config.ts\n  ✓ Read src/services/session-store.ts\n\n  ✎ Editing src/config.ts\n  ─────────────────────\n  + OKTA_DOMAIN:       process.env.OKTA_DOMAIN ?? '',\n  + OKTA_CLIENT_ID:    process.env.OKTA_CLIENT_ID ?? '',\n  + OKTA_CLIENT_SECRET: process.env.OKTA_CLIENT_SECRET ?? '',\n  + OKTA_REDIRECT_URI: process.env.OKTA_REDIRECT_URI ?? '',\n  + OKTA_SCOPES:       (process.env.OKTA_SCOPES ?? 'openid profile email').split(' '),\n  ✓ Wrote src/config.ts  (+5 lines)\n\n  ✎ Editing src/services/session-store.ts (adding PKCE state store)\n  ─────────────────────────────────────────\n  // --- PKCE state store (one-time use, 5-min TTL) ---\n\n  interface PkceEntry {\n    codeVerifier: string\n    expiresAt:    Date\n  }\n\n  const PKCE_TTL_MS = 5 * 60 * 1000  // 5 minutes\n\n  class PkceStateStore {\n    private store = new Map<string, PkceEntry>()\n\n    storePkceState(state: string, codeVerifier: string): void {\n      this.store.set(state, {\n        codeVerifier,\n        expiresAt: new Date(Date.now() + PKCE_TTL_MS),\n      })\n    }\n\n    consumePkceState(state: string): string | null {\n      const entry = this.store.get(state)\n      this.store.delete(state)  // one-time use regardless\n      if (!entry) return null\n      if (entry.expiresAt < new Date()) return null  // expired\n      return entry.codeVerifier\n    }\n  }\n\n  export const pkceStore = new PkceStateStore()\n  ─────────────────────────────────────────\n  ✓ Wrote src/services/session-store.ts  (+28 lines, now 97 lines)\n\n  Done. Type next task or Ctrl+C to exit.\n\n[09:34:15]\nVS Code — Terminal  (Claude Code — writes the Okta callback route)\n\n> Now add POST /auth/okta/callback to src/routes/auth.ts:\n  1. Install @okta/okta-auth-js (jsmith already has the SDK in package.json?)\n     Check first -- if not installed, add the import.\n  2. Implement the PKCE code exchange:\n     a. Read 'code' and 'state' from query params\n     b. consumePkceState(state) to get the codeVerifier (return 400 if missing/expired)\n     c. Exchange code + codeVerifier with Okta using the SDK\n     d. Extract userId + email from the Okta idToken claims\n     e. Find or create the user in our DB (db.users.findByEmail or create)\n     f. Call sessionStore.create(userId, email), set httpOnly cookie + return CSRF\n  3. Also add GET /auth/okta/redirect which kicks off the PKCE flow:\n     a. Generate random state and codeVerifier (crypto.randomBytes)\n     b. Store state -> codeVerifier in pkceStore\n     c. Redirect to Okta authorization URL with code_challenge + state\n\n● Claude is thinking...\n\n  ✓ Read src/routes/auth.ts  (98 lines)\n  ✓ Read package.json  →  @okta/okta-auth-js NOT found\n\n  Need to install @okta/okta-auth-js. Checking...\n  Note: @okta/okta-auth-js is primarily a browser SDK. For Node.js server-side\n  PKCE token exchange, the raw HTTP approach is simpler and avoids browser-only deps.\n  Recommending: use node-fetch / built-in fetch to call Okta token endpoint directly.\n\n  Proceeding with fetch-based implementation:\n\n  ✎ Editing src/routes/auth.ts (adding Okta routes)\n  ─────────────────────────────────────────\n  import crypto from 'crypto'\n  import { pkceStore } from '../services/session-store'\n\n  // Helper: base64url-encode a buffer\n  function base64url(buf: Buffer): string {\n    return buf.toString('base64')\n      .replace(/\\+/g, '-').replace(/\\//g, '_').replace(/=/g, '')\n  }\n\n  /**\n   * GET /auth/okta/redirect\n   * Initiates the Okta PKCE flow: generates state+codeVerifier,\n   * stores them, redirects to Okta authorization URL.\n   */\n  authRouter.get('/okta/redirect', (req: Request, res: Response) => {\n    const state         = crypto.randomBytes(16).toString('hex')\n    const codeVerifier  = base64url(crypto.randomBytes(32))\n    const codeChallenge = base64url(\n      crypto.createHash('sha256').update(codeVerifier).digest()\n    )\n    pkceStore.storePkceState(state, codeVerifier)\n\n    const params = new URLSearchParams({\n      response_type:          'code',\n      client_id:              config.OKTA_CLIENT_ID,\n      redirect_uri:           config.OKTA_REDIRECT_URI,\n      scope:                  config.OKTA_SCOPES.join(' '),\n      state,\n      code_challenge:         codeChallenge,\n      code_challenge_method:  'S256',\n    })\n    const authUrl = `https://${config.OKTA_DOMAIN}/oauth2/default/v1/authorize?${params}`\n    logger.info({ event: 'okta_redirect_initiated', state })\n    return res.redirect(authUrl)\n  })\n\n  /**\n   * POST /auth/okta/callback\n   * Receives the auth code from Okta, exchanges it for tokens,\n   * creates a session and sets httpOnly cookie.\n   */\n  authRouter.post('/okta/callback', async (req: Request, res: Response) => {\n    const { code, state } = req.body as { code?: string; state?: string }\n    if (!code || !state) {\n      return res.status(400).json({ error: 'code and state are required' })\n    }\n    const codeVerifier = pkceStore.consumePkceState(state)\n    if (!codeVerifier) {\n      logger.warn({ event: 'okta_callback_invalid_state', state })\n      return res.status(400).json({ error: 'Invalid or expired state parameter' })\n    }\n    // Exchange code + codeVerifier for tokens via Okta token endpoint\n    const tokenRes = await fetch(\n      `https://${config.OKTA_DOMAIN}/oauth2/default/v1/token`,\n      {\n        method: 'POST',\n        headers: { 'Content-Type': 'application/x-www-form-urlencoded' },\n        body: new URLSearchParams({\n          grant_type:    'authorization_code',\n          code,\n          code_verifier: codeVerifier,\n          client_id:     config.OKTA_CLIENT_ID,\n          client_secret: config.OKTA_CLIENT_SECRET,\n          redirect_uri:  config.OKTA_REDIRECT_URI,\n        }),\n      }\n    )\n    if (!tokenRes.ok) {\n      const body = await tokenRes.text()\n      logger.error({ event: 'okta_token_exchange_failed', status: tokenRes.status, body })\n      return res.status(502).json({ error: 'Okta token exchange failed' })\n    }\n    const tokens = await tokenRes.json() as {\n      id_token: string; access_token: string\n    }\n    // Decode idToken claims (JWT, verify signature in prod via Okta JWKS)\n    const idTokenPayload = JSON.parse(\n      Buffer.from(tokens.id_token.split('.')[1], 'base64url').toString()\n    ) as { sub: string; email: string; name: string }\n\n    // Find or create user in our database\n    let user = await db.users.findByEmail(idTokenPayload.email)\n    if (!user) {\n      user = await db.users.create({\n        email:    idTokenPayload.email,\n        name:     idTokenPayload.name,\n        provider: 'okta',\n        oktaSub:  idTokenPayload.sub,\n      })\n    }\n\n    // Create session + set cookie\n    const session = sessionStore.create(user.id, user.email)\n    res.cookie(COOKIE_NAME, session.sessionId, cookieOptions)\n    logger.info({ event: 'okta_login_success', userId: user.id, email: user.email })\n    return res.json({\n      csrfToken: session.csrfToken,\n      expiresAt: session.expiresAt.toISOString(),\n      maxAge:    SESSION_TTL_SECS,\n    })\n  })\n  ─────────────────────────────────────────\n  ✓ Wrote src/routes/auth.ts  (170 lines, +72 lines)\n\n  Notes:\n  • base64url() helper handles the base64-url encoding for PKCE\n  • codeVerifier is consumed (one-time) from pkceStore\n  • idToken signature is NOT verified (TODO: verify against Okta JWKS in prod)\n  • user.create() handles first-time SSO login (auto-provision)\n  • cookie is set identically to the password login path\n\n  Done.\n\n[09:35:40]\nVS Code — src/routes/auth.ts  (editor, reviewing the Okta routes)\n(developer scrolls to the okta/redirect route and reads the PKCE setup)\n\n 101   authRouter.get('/okta/redirect', (req: Request, res: Response) => {\n 102     const state         = crypto.randomBytes(16).toString('hex')\n 103     const codeVerifier  = base64url(crypto.randomBytes(32))\n 104     const codeChallenge = base64url(\n 105       crypto.createHash('sha256').update(codeVerifier).digest()\n 106     )\n 107     pkceStore.storePkceState(state, codeVerifier)\n 108     ...\n 109     return res.redirect(authUrl)\n 110   })\n\n(developer: PKCE challenge is SHA-256 of codeVerifier, base64url-encoded.\n codeVerifier is 32 random bytes base64url-encoded = 43 chars.\n Both are within Okta's requirements. State is 16 random bytes = 32 hex chars.)\n\n[09:35:55]\nVS Code — src/routes/auth.ts  (scrolled to callback, reading idToken decode)\n\n 145     const idTokenPayload = JSON.parse(\n 146       Buffer.from(tokens.id_token.split('.')[1], 'base64url').toString()\n 147     ) as { sub: string; email: string; name: string }\n\n(developer notices the TODO comment: idToken signature is not verified)\n(adds a TODO inline in the editor manually)\n\n[09:36:05]\nVS Code — src/routes/auth.ts  (cursor at line 145, typing)\n\n 143     // Decode idToken claims\n 144     // TODO(PROJ-210): verify idToken signature against Okta JWKS endpoint\n 145     //   GET https://${OKTA_DOMAIN}/oauth2/default/v1/keys\n 146     //   for now: trust the token (OK for internal use, not production-safe)\n 147     const idTokenPayload = JSON.parse(\n\n(developer saves the file: Cmd+S)\n\n[09:36:20]\nVS Code — Terminal  (tsc and tests)\n\n$ npx tsc --noEmit\n  (no output — exit 0)\n\n$ npm test -- --testPathPattern=routes/auth --verbose\n  PASS tests/routes/auth.test.ts\n    POST /auth/login (JWT path)           3 passed\n    POST /auth/login (cookie path)        3 passed\n    GET /auth/csrf-token                  3 passed\n    POST /auth/logout                     2 passed\n    DELETE /auth/session                  1 passed\n    GET /auth/okta/redirect               2 passed  (checks redirect URL, state stored)\n    POST /auth/okta/callback              4 passed  (success, bad state, expired state, Okta error)\n\n  Test Suites: 1 passed\n  Tests:       18 passed  |  Time: 2.4s\n\n[09:36:45]\nVS Code — Terminal  (commit)\n\n$ git add src/routes/auth.ts src/services/session-store.ts src/config.ts\n$ git commit -m \"feat(auth): add Okta PKCE callback and redirect routes\n>\n> PROJ-210: implement Okta SSO auth flow for PROJ-315 dependency.\n>\n> GET /auth/okta/redirect:\n>   - generates state (16 random bytes) and codeVerifier (32 random bytes)\n>   - stores state->codeVerifier in PkceStateStore (5-min TTL, one-time use)\n>   - redirects to Okta authorization URL with code_challenge (S256)\n>\n> POST /auth/okta/callback:\n>   - consumes state from PkceStateStore (invalid/expired -> 400)\n>   - exchanges code + codeVerifier with Okta token endpoint (raw fetch)\n>   - decodes idToken claims (TODO: verify against Okta JWKS)\n>   - find-or-create user in db\n>   - creates session, sets httpOnly cookie, returns CSRF token\n>\n> Also: add OKTA_* fields to config.ts and PkceStateStore to session-store.ts\"\n\n  [feat/proj-210-auth-migration 9f1e3c5]\n  feat(auth): add Okta PKCE callback and redirect routes\n  3 files changed, 105 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)\n\n(developer: 3 commits on feat/proj-210-auth-migration now:\n  b3e2f91 -- auth middleware + session store scaffold\n  c7d4a82 -- login/csrf-token/logout routes\n  9f1e3c5 -- Okta PKCE callback + redirect\n Core backend implementation for PROJ-210 is done.\n Remaining before pair session at 13:00:\n   - Add pruneExpired() scheduler (setInterval every 5 min)\n   - Quick manual test: curl the endpoints locally\n   - Pair with Alex at 13:00 for frontend CSRF token wiring)\n(checks time: 09:37. Design sync at 11:00. Comfortable.)\n",
+      "audio_snippets": [],
+      "ground_truth": {
+        "task_key": "PROJ-210",
+        "session_type": "task",
+        "reasoning": "VS Code session implementing Okta PKCE callback and redirect routes for PROJ-210. Developer checks config.ts (Okta fields missing), prompts Claude Code to add OKTA_* to config, add PkceStateStore to session-store.ts (storePkceState, consumePkceState with 5-min TTL one-time-use), and implement GET /auth/okta/redirect (generates state+codeVerifier, SHA-256 code_challenge, redirects to Okta) and POST /auth/okta/callback (consumePkceState, fetch to Okta token endpoint, decode idToken, find-or-create user, sessionStore.create, set cookie). Developer adds TODO(PROJ-210) comment about JWKS verification. Runs tsc (clean), runs auth tests (18/18). Commits. Files: src/routes/auth.ts (+72), src/services/session-store.ts (+28), src/config.ts (+5).",
+        "difficulty": "easy",
+        "scoreable": true
+      },
+      "design_notes": "EASY case — unambiguous PROJ-210 continuation. Three consecutive VS Code sessions (3, 4, 5) on the auth migration. Each session moves forward on the PROJ-210 acceptance criteria. Session 5 specifically implements the Okta PKCE handler that jsmith coordinated in session 2's Slack DM — showing narrative continuity. PROJ-315 is mentioned in the commit message as the downstream dependency, but the primary ticket is clearly PROJ-210. The 'TODO(PROJ-210)' comment and commit message referencing PROJ-210 are unambiguous anchors."
+    },
+    {
+      "id": 6,
+      "app_name": "Notes",
+      "started_at": "2026-05-27T09:38:00+05:30",
+      "ended_at": "2026-05-27T09:38:50+05:30",
+      "duration_s": 11,
+      "category": "planning",
+      "confidence": 0.95,
+      "session_text_source": "ocr",
+      "window_titles": [
+        {
+          "window_name": "Notes — PROJ-210 progress",
+          "count": 2
+        }
+      ],
+      "session_text": "[09:38:00]\nNotes — macOS\n  iCloud\n  All iCloud\n    Zuno / Dev Notes\n      PROJ-210 progress  <- ACTIVE\n      PROJ-201 circuit breaker plan\n      Sprint 2026-05 kickoff\n    Personal\n\n[09:38:05]\nNotes — PROJ-210 progress\nPROJ-210 auth migration -- 2026-05-27  09:38\n\nDone so far:\n  ✓ src/middleware/auth.ts -- cookie+CSRF path (b3e2f91)\n  ✓ src/services/session-store.ts -- InMemorySessionStore + PkceStateStore\n  ✓ src/routes/auth.ts -- login, csrf-token, logout, okta/redirect, okta/callback\n  ✓ src/config.ts -- OKTA_* fields added\n  ✓ tsc clean, 18/18 auth tests passing\n\nStill TODO before pair session (13:00):\n  - pruneExpired() scheduler (setInterval 5min in app.ts startup)\n  - quick manual curl test against localhost:3000\n  - push branch and open PR draft for Sarah review\n\nDesign sync at 11:00 (PROJ-225 dashboard perf):\n  - Review Figma skeleton designs\n  - Confirm React.lazy() + Suspense boundaries plan\n  - ChartSkeleton fallback (not null) -- Priya's note\n  - Performance targets: initial load <1s, full <4s\n\n(developer saves -- Cmd+S, closes Notes)\n",
+      "audio_snippets": [],
+      "ground_truth": {
+        "task_key": "none",
+        "session_type": "overhead",
+        "reasoning": "Short Notes session updating a running progress checklist. Developer lists completed PROJ-210 commits, notes remaining TODOs before the 13:00 pair session, and sketches the design sync agenda. No code produced.",
+        "difficulty": "context-only",
+        "scoreable": false
+      },
+      "design_notes": "CONTEXT-ONLY — not scoreable. Too short and too meta. Establishes continuity: after 3 consecutive PROJ-210 VS Code sessions, developer takes a moment to jot a checklist before switching context to PROJ-225 design sync."
+    },
+    {
+      "id": 7,
+      "app_name": "Google Chrome",
+      "started_at": "2026-05-27T09:39:10+05:30",
+      "ended_at": "2026-05-27T09:41:45+05:30",
+      "duration_s": 44,
+      "category": "research",
+      "confidence": 0.75,
+      "session_text_source": "ocr",
+      "window_titles": [
+        {
+          "window_name": "Stripe Docs — Webhooks — Google Chrome",
+          "count": 4
+        },
+        {
+          "window_name": "MDN — SubtleCrypto.digest() — Google Chrome",
+          "count": 2
+        }
+      ],
+      "session_text": "[09:39:10]\nGoogle Chrome\nTabs:\n  (1) Stripe Docs — Webhooks  <- ACTIVE\n  (2) MDN — Web Crypto API\n  (3) Stack Overflow — Node.js fetch PKCE\n\nURL: https://stripe.com/docs/webhooks\nStripe Docs > Developers > Webhooks > Overview\n\n[09:39:22]\nStripe Docs — Webhook fundamentals\n\nWebhooks overview\nStripe uses webhooks to push real-time notifications to your application when\nevents happen in your account. For example, you can use webhooks to:\n  - Update customer subscription status when a payment fails\n  - Fulfill orders when a checkout session completes\n  - Notify customers when their invoices are ready\n\nWebhook event types:\n  payment_intent.created\n  payment_intent.succeeded\n  payment_intent.payment_failed\n  customer.subscription.created\n  customer.subscription.deleted\n  checkout.session.completed\n  invoice.payment_succeeded\n  invoice.payment_failed\n\nRetry behavior (from Stripe):\n  Stripe retries failed webhook deliveries over the next 72 hours.\n  The retry schedule uses exponential backoff:\n    Retry 1:   5 minutes\n    Retry 2:  30 minutes\n    Retry 3:   2 hours\n    Retry 4:   5 hours\n    Retry 5:  10 hours\n    Retry 6:  24 hours\n    Retry 7:  48 hours\n    Retry 8:  72 hours (max)\n  Note: Stripe's retry window (72 hours) is much longer than Zuno's (30 seconds).\n  Zuno's webhook retry is for outbound delivery, not inbound Stripe events.\n\n[09:40:05]\nStripe Docs — Webhook security\n(developer clicks \"Check webhook signatures\" in the left nav)\n\nURL: https://stripe.com/docs/webhooks#verify-official-libraries\n\nWebhook signatures\nStripe signs every webhook event so you can verify that the data\nwas sent by Stripe and not by a third party.\n\nSignature header: Stripe-Signature\nFormat: t=<timestamp>,v1=<signature>,v0=<old_signature>\n\nVerification (Node.js):\n  import Stripe from 'stripe'\n  const stripe = new Stripe(STRIPE_SECRET_KEY)\n  \n  app.post('/webhook', express.raw({ type: 'application/json' }), (req, res) => {\n    const sig = req.headers['stripe-signature']\n    let event\n    try {\n      event = stripe.webhooks.constructEvent(req.body, sig, WEBHOOK_SECRET)\n    } catch (err) {\n      return res.status(400).send(`Webhook error: ${err.message}`)\n    }\n    switch (event.type) {\n      case 'payment_intent.succeeded':\n        // handle payment\n        break\n    }\n    res.json({ received: true })\n  })\n\n[09:40:45]\nStripe Docs — Idempotency\n(developer scrolls to the idempotency section)\n\nIdempotent webhook handling:\n  Because Stripe retries events, your webhook handler must be idempotent.\n  If your handler fails mid-execution, Stripe will retry and your handler\n  may process the same event twice.\n\n  Best practice: track processed event IDs in your database.\n  Before processing: check if event.id already exists in your events table.\n  After processing: insert event.id into your events table.\n\n  This prevents double-charging, double-fulfillment, etc.\n\n(developer: interesting -- this is the same idempotency pattern Lead mentioned\n for PROJ-201. Stripe uses event.id for dedup, Zuno uses delivery_id (UUID).\n Same concept, same motivation.)\n(developer closes this tab -- was just curiosity research)\n\n[09:41:10]\nGoogle Chrome — MDN Web Crypto API\n(developer switches to MDN tab -- was looking up PKCE implementation reference)\n\nURL: https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/API/SubtleCrypto/digest\n\nSubtleCrypto.digest()\nThe digest() method of the SubtleCrypto interface generates a digest of the\ngiven data. A digest is a short fixed-length value derived from some\nvariable-length input. Cryptographic digests should exhibit collision-resistance,\nmeaning that it's hard to come up with two different inputs that have the same\ndigest value.\n\nSyntax:\n  const digest = await crypto.subtle.digest(algorithm, data)\n\nParameters:\n  algorithm: DOMString or object\n    'SHA-1' | 'SHA-256' | 'SHA-384' | 'SHA-512'\n  data: ArrayBuffer, TypedArray, or DataView\n\nReturns: Promise<ArrayBuffer>\n\nExample (SHA-256):\n  const msgBuffer = new TextEncoder().encode('message')\n  const hashBuffer = await crypto.subtle.digest('SHA-256', msgBuffer)\n  const hashArray = Array.from(new Uint8Array(hashBuffer))\n  const hashHex = hashArray.map(b => b.toString(16).padStart(2, '0')).join('')\n\n(developer: this is the browser SubtleCrypto API -- not what I need for the server.\n Node.js uses crypto.createHash('sha256').update(buf).digest() which I already used.\n Just confirming the SHA-256 approach for PKCE is correct.)\n(closes Chrome)\n",
+      "audio_snippets": [],
+      "ground_truth": {
+        "task_key": "none",
+        "session_type": "untracked",
+        "reasoning": "Chrome session reading Stripe webhook documentation and MDN Web Crypto API. Developer reads Stripe's retry schedule (out of curiosity — Stripe's 72-hour window vs Zuno's 30-second window are different concepts), reads webhook signature verification code, reads idempotency section (notices similarity to PROJ-201's delivery_id pattern). Then checks MDN SubtleCrypto.digest() to confirm SHA-256 PKCE approach in Node.js. Developer explicitly notes this was curiosity research, not task implementation. No code written, no files changed, no ticket being actively worked.",
+        "difficulty": "hard-decoy",
+        "scoreable": true
+      },
+      "design_notes": "HARD-DECOY — webhook vocabulary (retry, exponential backoff, idempotency, delivery_id, signature verification) is near-identical to PROJ-201 vocabulary. A classifier that memorises 'exponential backoff' or 'idempotency' keywords maps this to PROJ-201. The correct identification requires reading the context: this is Stripe's OUTBOUND webhook retry documentation (a third-party reference), not Zuno's INBOUND webhook retry worker. Developer is reading docs, not editing files. Window titles show Chrome/Stripe Docs, not VS Code. Developer's internal note ('was just curiosity research') is a discriminator signal. The MDN tab about SubtleCrypto confirms developer was cross-referencing implementation, not implementing."
+    },
+    {
+      "id": 8,
+      "app_name": "Code",
+      "started_at": "2026-05-27T09:42:00+05:30",
+      "ended_at": "2026-05-27T09:44:50+05:30",
+      "duration_s": 44,
+      "category": "coding",
+      "confidence": 0.97,
+      "session_text_source": "ocr",
+      "window_titles": [
+        {
+          "window_name": "src/app.ts — zuno-app — Visual Studio Code",
+          "count": 3
+        },
+        {
+          "window_name": "Terminal — zsh — zuno-app",
+          "count": 5
+        }
+      ],
+      "session_text": "[09:42:00]\nVisual Studio Code\nWindow: zuno-app — Visual Studio Code\nActive tab: src/app.ts\nStatus bar: TypeScript  |  Branch: feat/proj-210-auth-migration  |  0 errors\n\n[09:42:08]\nVS Code — src/app.ts  (opening for pruneExpired scheduler)\n\n  1   import express from 'express'\n  2   import cookieParser from 'cookie-parser'\n  3   import { authRouter } from './routes/auth'\n  4   import { webhookRouter } from './routes/webhooks'\n  5   import { requestLogger } from './middleware/requestLogger'\n  6   import { config } from './config'\n  7   \n  8   export const app = express()\n  9   app.use(express.json())\n 10   app.use(cookieParser())\n 11   app.use(requestLogger)\n 12   \n 13   app.use('/auth', authRouter)\n 14   app.use('/webhooks', webhookRouter)\n 15   \n 16   export function startServer(): void {\n 17     app.listen(config.PORT, () => {\n 18       console.log(`Server listening on port ${config.PORT}`)\n 19     })\n 20   }\n\n[09:42:20]\nVS Code — Terminal\n\n> Add a pruneExpired() scheduler to src/app.ts: call sessionStore.pruneExpired()\n  every 5 minutes using setInterval. Also log the pruned count with the Datadog\n  logger so we can track session store size in production.\n\n● Claude is thinking...\n\n  ✓ Read src/app.ts\n  ✎ Editing src/app.ts\n  + import { sessionStore } from './services/session-store'\n  + import logger from './utils/logger'\n  ...\n  + // Prune expired sessions every 5 minutes\n  + setInterval(() => {\n  +   const pruned = sessionStore.pruneExpired()\n  +   if (pruned > 0) {\n  +     logger.info({ event: 'session_store_pruned', count: pruned,\n  +                   remaining: sessionStore.size() })\n  +   }\n  + }, 5 * 60 * 1000).unref()  // .unref() so it doesn't prevent process exit\n  ✓ Wrote src/app.ts  (+9 lines)\n\n$ npx tsc --noEmit\n  (exit 0)\n\n[09:43:00]\nVS Code — Terminal  (manual curl test against localhost)\n\n$ npm run dev &\n  [dev] Server listening on port 3000\n\n$ curl -s -X POST http://localhost:3000/auth/login \\\n    -H 'Content-Type: application/json' \\\n    -d '{\"email\":\"test@zuno.io\",\"password\":\"testpassword\"}' | jq .\n  {\n    \"csrfToken\": \"a3f91b2c...(64 hex chars)\",\n    \"expiresAt\": \"2026-06-26T04:13:05.123Z\",\n    \"maxAge\": 2592000\n  }\n\n(developer: AUTH_COOKIE_ENABLED must be set to true in .env for the cookie path)\n\n$ AUTH_COOKIE_ENABLED=true npm run dev &\n  [dev] Server listening on port 3001\n\n$ curl -s -c /tmp/zuno-cookies.txt -X POST http://localhost:3001/auth/login \\\n    -H 'Content-Type: application/json' \\\n    -d '{\"email\":\"test@zuno.io\",\"password\":\"testpassword\"}' | jq .\n  {\n    \"csrfToken\": \"b7d42f1a8e3c90ab5f6d7e8f9a0b1c2d3e4f5a6b7c8d9e0f1a2b3c4d5e6f7a8b\",\n    \"expiresAt\": \"2026-06-26T04:13:15.456Z\",\n    \"maxAge\": 2592000\n  }\n\n$ cat /tmp/zuno-cookies.txt\n  # Netscape HTTP Cookie File\n  localhost  FALSE  /  FALSE  1782025995  zuno_session  4f7a1b3d...\n\n(developer: cookie is being set)\n\n$ CSRF=$(curl -s -c /tmp/zuno-cookies.txt -b /tmp/zuno-cookies.txt \\\n    http://localhost:3001/auth/csrf-token | jq -r .csrfToken)\n$ echo \"CSRF: $CSRF\"\n  CSRF: b7d42f1a8e3c90ab5f6d7e8f9a0b1c2d3e4f5a6b7c8d9e0f1a2b3c4d5e6f7a8b\n\n$ curl -s -b /tmp/zuno-cookies.txt \\\n    -H \"X-CSRF-Token: $CSRF\" \\\n    -X POST http://localhost:3001/auth/logout | jq .\n  { \"message\": \"Logged out\" }\n\n(developer: login, csrf-token, logout all working manually. cookie path confirmed.)\n\n$ kill %1 %2  # kill the dev servers\n\n[09:44:10]\nVS Code — Terminal  (commit and push)\n\n$ git add src/app.ts\n$ git commit -m \"feat(auth): add session pruneExpired scheduler in app.ts\n>\n> PROJ-210: prune expired sessions every 5 min via setInterval.\n> .unref() so the interval doesn't block process exit.\n> Logs pruned count + remaining count via Datadog logger.\"\n\n  [feat/proj-210-auth-migration f2b9d01]\n  feat(auth): add session pruneExpired scheduler\n  1 file changed, 9 insertions(+)\n\n$ git push -u origin feat/proj-210-auth-migration\n  Enumerating objects: 18, done.\n  Branch feat/proj-210-auth-migration set up to track remote.\n\n$ gh pr create --draft --title 'feat(auth): JWT -> session cookie migration (PROJ-210)'\\\n    --body 'PROJ-210: auth migration backend. All routes done, tests passing.\n    Pair session with @alex at 13:00 for frontend integration.\n    TODO before merging: integration tests for cookie path.'\n  Draft PR #92 created: https://github.com/zuno-app/zuno/pull/92\n\n(developer: backend implementation complete. PR #92 open as draft.\n Ready for 11:00 design sync on PROJ-225.)\n",
+      "audio_snippets": [],
+      "ground_truth": {
+        "task_key": "PROJ-210",
+        "session_type": "task",
+        "reasoning": "VS Code session wrapping up PROJ-210 backend implementation. Developer opens app.ts, adds pruneExpired() scheduler (setInterval 5min, unref, Datadog log). Runs manual curl tests: login with cookie path, fetch csrf-token, POST logout — all working. Commits, pushes branch, opens draft PR #92 on GitHub. End of PROJ-210 backend work before the pair session at 13:00.",
+        "difficulty": "easy",
+        "scoreable": true
+      },
+      "design_notes": "EASY PROJ-210 case — same branch, same PR, same acceptance criteria. The curl test output (zuno_session cookie, csrfToken hex, expiresAt, maxAge) confirms the cookie path is live. developer explicitly notes 'backend implementation complete' and PR #92 for PROJ-210. No ambiguity with PROJ-201 or PROJ-225."
+    },
+    {
+      "id": 9,
+      "app_name": "Google Chrome",
+      "started_at": "2026-05-27T10:55:05+05:30",
+      "ended_at": "2026-05-27T10:57:15+05:30",
+      "duration_s": 41,
+      "category": "research",
+      "confidence": 0.88,
+      "session_text_source": "ocr",
+      "window_titles": [
+        {
+          "window_name": "Figma — Zuno Dashboard Skeleton — Google Chrome",
+          "count": 5
+        },
+        {
+          "window_name": "Linear — PROJ-225 — Google Chrome",
+          "count": 2
+        }
+      ],
+      "session_text": "[10:55:05]\nGoogle Chrome\nTabs:\n  (1) Figma — Zuno Dashboard Skeleton  <- ACTIVE\n  (2) Linear — PROJ-225\n  (3) GitHub — PR #92  (PROJ-210 draft)\n\nURL: https://www.figma.com/design/XXXXX/zuno-dashboard-skeleton\n(developer opened the Figma link from the PROJ-225 Linear comment)\n\n[10:55:15]\nFigma — Zuno Dashboard Skeleton\n\nPages (left panel):\n  Page 1: Skeleton states (3 heavy charts)  <- ACTIVE\n  Page 2: Loading sequence animation\n  Page 3: Edge cases (error, empty data)\n\nPage 1 — Skeleton states:\n\nFrame: Revenue Analysis Chart Skeleton\n  Dimensions: 800w x 400h\n  Background: neutral-100 (#F3F4F6)\n  Skeleton bars: 6 rows x 4 columns, fill neutral-300 (#E5E7EB)\n  Legend placeholder: 2 lines, neutral-300, 120w x 16h each\n  Animation: pulse (opacity 1.0 -> 0.5 -> 1.0, 1s, ease-in-out, infinite)\n  Notes from Priya: 'bar rows represent the grouped bar chart structure.\n    use 6 rows to match the chart's max visible data points.'\n\nFrame: Forecast Comparison Chart Skeleton\n  Dimensions: 800w x 380h\n  Background: neutral-100 (#F3F4F6)\n  Line placeholder: single curved line, neutral-300, stroke-width 2\n  Shaded area: below the line, neutral-200 (#E9EAEC), opacity 0.6\n  X-axis labels: 5 rectangles, neutral-300, 60w x 12h each\n  Y-axis labels: 4 rectangles, neutral-300, 30w x 12h each\n  Notes from Priya: 'the line skeleton should feel like a forecast line.\n    subtle curve, not a straight line.'\n\nFrame: Analytics Grid Skeleton\n  Dimensions: 800w x 500h\n  Background: neutral-100 (#F3F4F6)\n  Grid: 4 columns x 8 rows of cells\n  Cell: neutral-300, 180w x 40h, rounded-lg corners\n  Header row: darker neutral-400 (#D1D5DB), 180w x 48h\n  Notes from Priya: 'header row slightly darker to distinguish column headers.\n    match the actual analytics grid layout exactly (4 cols, 8 visible rows).'\n\n[10:55:55]\nFigma — Page 2: Loading sequence animation\n(developer clicks Page 2)\n\nPage 2 — Loading sequence:\n\nFrame: Dashboard initial load (t=0)\n  Visible immediately (no skeleton needed):\n    KPI tiles (4 tiles): showing real data\n    Status bars: showing real data\n    Activity feed: showing real data\n    Export stats: showing real data\n  Skeleton (loading):\n    Revenue Analysis: skeleton bars visible, pulse animation running\n    Forecast Comparison: skeleton line visible, pulse animation running\n    Analytics Grid: skeleton cells visible, pulse animation running\n\nFrame: Revenue loads (t=850ms)\n  Revenue Analysis: real chart appears (fade-in transition 300ms)\n  Forecast: still skeleton\n  Analytics: still skeleton\n\nFrame: Forecast loads (t=1630ms)\n  Revenue Analysis: real chart\n  Forecast Comparison: real chart appears (fade-in 300ms)\n  Analytics: still skeleton\n\nFrame: Analytics loads (t=2280ms)\n  All charts loaded: full dashboard visible\n\nPriya's annotation: 'the fade-in transition on chart reveal is important.\n  without it, the chart popping in feels jarring. 300ms fade is subtle enough.'\n\n[10:56:30]\nFigma — Page 3: Edge cases\n\nFrame: Error state (chart fails to load)\n  Instead of skeleton, show: error icon + 'Failed to load' text\n  Action button: 'Retry'\n  Background: neutral-100, border: red-200\n\nFrame: Empty data state\n  No data for the selected time range\n  Show: empty chart icon + 'No data for this period' text\n  Background: neutral-50\n\n(developer: need to handle error state in the Suspense fallback too.\n ErrorBoundary component wrapping each lazy chart -- catches load errors.)\n(makes a note to add ErrorBoundary to the Suspense structure)\n\n[10:56:55]\nGoogle Chrome — Linear — PROJ-225\n(developer switches to the Linear tab to re-read the acceptance criteria)\n\nPROJ-225 Performance targets:\n  Initial load (FCP): <1s\n  Full dashboard: <4s\n  Per-chart lazy load: <500ms each\n\nTechnical approach (confirmed in design sync):\n  React.lazy() + Suspense for code splitting\n  Skeleton: ChartSkeleton component (not null fallback)\n  ErrorBoundary: wraps each lazy chart for error/retry state\n  Fade-in transition: 300ms on chart reveal\n\n(developer: design sync was productive. skeleton specs are clear.\n Ready to implement React.lazy() after reviewing PROJ-201 with Sarah at 14:30.)\n(closes Chrome)\n",
+      "audio_snippets": [],
+      "ground_truth": {
+        "task_key": "PROJ-225",
+        "session_type": "task",
+        "reasoning": "Chrome session reviewing the Figma skeleton design for PROJ-225. Developer opens the Figma link from the PROJ-225 Linear comment, reviews all three pages: skeleton states (revenue 6-bar rows, forecast curve + shade, analytics 4-col grid), loading sequence (fast charts immediate, heavy charts with skeleton then fade-in at 850ms/1630ms/2280ms), edge cases (error + retry, empty data state). Notes ErrorBoundary requirement for error state. Checks PROJ-225 acceptance criteria in Linear. This is design review work directly for PROJ-225 implementation — developer is gathering implementation spec, not just browsing.",
+        "difficulty": "medium",
+        "scoreable": true
+      },
+      "design_notes": "MEDIUM PROJ-225 case — developer is reviewing Figma designs for PROJ-225. Unlike session 1 (reading Linear tickets = overhead), this session involves translating design specs into implementation notes (ErrorBoundary, fade-in transition, skeleton proportions). The classifier needs to distinguish this from session 1's overhead reading. Discriminator: developer is making implementation decisions based on the designs ('need to add ErrorBoundary'), checking acceptance criteria, confirming technical approach. Adjacent ticket PROJ-210 PR #92 is open in a tab but not read. No PROJ-201 content. The medium difficulty comes from PROJ-225 and PROJ-230 sharing the 'dashboard' vocabulary — though PROJ-230 is not mentioned here."
+    },
+    {
+      "id": 10,
+      "app_name": "Code",
+      "started_at": "2026-05-27T11:35:00+05:30",
+      "ended_at": "2026-05-27T11:38:05+05:30",
+      "duration_s": 94,
+      "category": "coding",
+      "confidence": 0.98,
+      "session_text_source": "ocr",
+      "window_titles": [
+        {
+          "window_name": "src/components/Dashboard/index.tsx — zuno-app — Visual Studio Code",
+          "count": 5
+        },
+        {
+          "window_name": "src/components/Skeleton/index.tsx — zuno-app — Visual Studio Code",
+          "count": 3
+        },
+        {
+          "window_name": "Terminal — zsh — zuno-app",
+          "count": 4
+        }
+      ],
+      "session_text": "[11:35:00]\nVisual Studio Code\nWindow: zuno-app — Visual Studio Code\nBranch: feat/proj-225-dashboard-lazy-load\nActive tabs:\n  src/components/Dashboard/index.tsx  <- ACTIVE\n  src/components/Skeleton/index.tsx   (new, will create)\n\nStatus bar: TypeScript React  |  0 errors  |  Branch: feat/proj-225-dashboard-lazy-load\n\n[11:35:10]\nVS Code — src/components/Dashboard/index.tsx  (current file, heavy imports)\n\n  1   // zuno-app — dashboard component\n  2   import React from 'react'\n  3   import { RevenueChart } from './charts/RevenueChart'\n  4   import { ForecastChart } from './charts/ForecastChart'\n  5   import { AnalyticsGrid } from './charts/AnalyticsGrid'\n  6   import { KPITiles } from './widgets/KPITiles'\n  7   import { StatusBars } from './widgets/StatusBars'\n  8   import { ActivityFeed } from './widgets/ActivityFeed'\n  9   import { ExportStats } from './widgets/ExportStats'\n 10   import { SettingsPanel } from './widgets/SettingsPanel'\n 11   \n 12   export function Dashboard() {\n 13     return (\n 14       <div className='dashboard-grid'>\n 15         <KPITiles />\n 16         <StatusBars />\n 17         <ActivityFeed />\n 18         <ExportStats />\n 19         <SettingsPanel />\n 20         <RevenueChart />\n 21         <ForecastChart />\n 22         <AnalyticsGrid />\n 23       </div>\n 24     )\n 25   }\n\n(developer: all 8 imports are static — all charts load on mount.\n need to convert RevenueChart, ForecastChart, AnalyticsGrid to React.lazy())\n\n[11:35:30]\nVS Code — Terminal\n\n$ git checkout -b feat/proj-225-dashboard-lazy-load\n  Switched to a new branch 'feat/proj-225-dashboard-lazy-load'\n\n> PROJ-225 dashboard perf: convert the 3 heavy chart imports in\n  src/components/Dashboard/index.tsx to React.lazy() + Suspense.\n  Heavy charts: RevenueChart, ForecastChart, AnalyticsGrid.\n  Fast widgets (no lazy-loading needed): KPITiles, StatusBars, ActivityFeed,\n  ExportStats, SettingsPanel.\n  For each lazy chart, wrap in <Suspense> with a skeleton fallback:\n    RevenueChart  -> <RevenueChartSkeleton />\n    ForecastChart -> <ForecastChartSkeleton />\n    AnalyticsGrid -> <AnalyticsGridSkeleton />\n  Also wrap each Suspense in an <ErrorBoundary> to handle load errors.\n  Also create src/components/Skeleton/index.tsx with the 3 skeleton components.\n  Skeleton colors from Figma: background neutral-100, bars neutral-300 (#E5E7EB),\n  animation: 'animate-pulse' (Tailwind). Fade-in on chart reveal: 300ms opacity transition.\n\n● Claude is thinking...\n\n  ✓ Read src/components/Dashboard/index.tsx\n  ✓ Search: ErrorBoundary in src/  → found src/components/ErrorBoundary.tsx (exists!)\n  ✓ Read src/components/ErrorBoundary.tsx  (19 lines, standard React error boundary)\n  ✓ Read tailwind.config.js  → animate-pulse is available\n\n  Plan:\n  1. Create src/components/Skeleton/index.tsx (3 skeleton components)\n  2. Update src/components/Dashboard/index.tsx:\n     - Convert 3 heavy imports to React.lazy()\n     - Wrap each in <ErrorBoundary><Suspense fallback={<Skeleton />}>\n     - Add transition class to chart containers for fade-in\n\n  ✎ Writing src/components/Skeleton/index.tsx\n  ─────────────────────────────────────────\n  // zuno-app — chart skeleton loading states (PROJ-225)\n  import React from 'react'\n\n  const pulse = 'animate-pulse bg-neutral-300 rounded'\n\n  export function RevenueChartSkeleton() {\n    return (\n      <div className='w-full h-[400px] bg-neutral-100 rounded-lg p-4'>\n        {/* 6 bar rows */}\n        {Array.from({ length: 6 }).map((_, i) => (\n          <div key={i} className='flex gap-2 mb-3'>\n            {Array.from({ length: 4 }).map((_, j) => (\n              <div key={j}\n                className={`h-10 flex-1 ${pulse}`}\n                style={{ animationDelay: `${(i * 4 + j) * 50}ms` }}\n              />\n            ))}\n          </div>\n        ))}\n        {/* legend placeholders */}\n        <div className='flex gap-3 mt-4'>\n          <div className={`h-4 w-28 ${pulse}`} />\n          <div className={`h-4 w-28 ${pulse}`} />\n        </div>\n      </div>\n    )\n  }\n\n  export function ForecastChartSkeleton() {\n    return (\n      <div className='w-full h-[380px] bg-neutral-100 rounded-lg p-4 relative'>\n        {/* shaded area placeholder */}\n        <div className='absolute bottom-12 left-4 right-4 h-32 bg-neutral-200 opacity-60 rounded' />\n        {/* line placeholder */}\n        <svg className='absolute inset-4' aria-hidden>\n          <path d='M 0 200 Q 200 80 400 150 Q 600 220 800 100'\n                fill='none' stroke='#E5E7EB' strokeWidth={2} />\n        </svg>\n        {/* axis labels */}\n        <div className='absolute bottom-2 left-4 right-4 flex justify-between'>\n          {Array.from({ length: 5 }).map((_, i) => (\n            <div key={i} className={`h-3 w-14 ${pulse}`} />\n          ))}\n        </div>\n      </div>\n    )\n  }\n\n  export function AnalyticsGridSkeleton() {\n    return (\n      <div className='w-full h-[500px] bg-neutral-100 rounded-lg p-4'>\n        {/* header row */}\n        <div className='grid grid-cols-4 gap-2 mb-2'>\n          {Array.from({ length: 4 }).map((_, i) => (\n            <div key={i} className='h-12 bg-neutral-400 animate-pulse rounded' />\n          ))}\n        </div>\n        {/* data rows */}\n        {Array.from({ length: 8 }).map((_, r) => (\n          <div key={r} className='grid grid-cols-4 gap-2 mb-2'>\n            {Array.from({ length: 4 }).map((_, c) => (\n              <div key={c}\n                className={`h-10 ${pulse}`}\n                style={{ animationDelay: `${(r * 4 + c) * 30}ms` }}\n              />\n            ))}\n          </div>\n        ))}\n      </div>\n    )\n  }\n  ─────────────────────────────────────────\n  ✓ Wrote src/components/Skeleton/index.tsx  (73 lines)\n\n  ✎ Writing src/components/Dashboard/index.tsx (updated)\n  ─────────────────────────────────────────\n  // zuno-app — dashboard component (PROJ-225: lazy-load heavy charts)\n  import React, { lazy, Suspense } from 'react'\n  import { KPITiles } from './widgets/KPITiles'\n  import { StatusBars } from './widgets/StatusBars'\n  import { ActivityFeed } from './widgets/ActivityFeed'\n  import { ExportStats } from './widgets/ExportStats'\n  import { SettingsPanel } from './widgets/SettingsPanel'\n  import { ErrorBoundary } from '../ErrorBoundary'\n  import {\n    RevenueChartSkeleton,\n    ForecastChartSkeleton,\n    AnalyticsGridSkeleton,\n  } from '../Skeleton'\n\n  // Heavy charts: code-split via React.lazy()\n  const RevenueChart  = lazy(() => import('./charts/RevenueChart'))\n  const ForecastChart = lazy(() => import('./charts/ForecastChart'))\n  const AnalyticsGrid = lazy(() => import('./charts/AnalyticsGrid'))\n\n  export function Dashboard() {\n    return (\n      <div className='dashboard-grid'>\n        {/* Fast widgets: load immediately */}\n        <KPITiles />\n        <StatusBars />\n        <ActivityFeed />\n        <ExportStats />\n        <SettingsPanel />\n\n        {/* Heavy charts: lazy-load with skeleton fallback */}\n        <ErrorBoundary fallback={<div className='chart-error'>Failed to load chart.</div>}>\n          <Suspense fallback={<RevenueChartSkeleton />}>\n            <div className='chart-fade-in'><RevenueChart /></div>\n          </Suspense>\n        </ErrorBoundary>\n\n        <ErrorBoundary fallback={<div className='chart-error'>Failed to load chart.</div>}>\n          <Suspense fallback={<ForecastChartSkeleton />}>\n            <div className='chart-fade-in'><ForecastChart /></div>\n          </Suspense>\n        </ErrorBoundary>\n\n        <ErrorBoundary fallback={<div className='chart-error'>Failed to load chart.</div>}>\n          <Suspense fallback={<AnalyticsGridSkeleton />}>\n            <div className='chart-fade-in'><AnalyticsGrid /></div>\n          </Suspense>\n        </ErrorBoundary>\n      </div>\n    )\n  }\n  ─────────────────────────────────────────\n  ✓ Wrote src/components/Dashboard/index.tsx  (47 lines)\n\n  Notes:\n  • chart-fade-in CSS class: add 'transition-opacity duration-300' in globals.css\n  • animationDelay staggering in skeletons makes them feel less uniform\n  • ErrorBoundary was already in codebase — just imported\n\n  Done.\n\n[11:37:40]\nVS Code — Terminal\n\n$ npx tsc --noEmit\n  (exit 0)\n\n$ npm test -- --testPathPattern=Dashboard\n  PASS src/components/Dashboard/Dashboard.test.tsx\n    Dashboard\n      ✓ renders fast widgets immediately  (34ms)\n      ✓ renders skeleton for heavy charts on initial load  (28ms)\n      ✓ renders charts after lazy load resolves  (51ms)\n      ✓ renders ErrorBoundary fallback if chart throws  (19ms)\n  Tests: 4 passed  |  Time: 2.1s\n\n$ git add src/components/Dashboard/index.tsx src/components/Skeleton/index.tsx\n$ git commit -m 'feat(dashboard): lazy-load heavy chart components with skeleton (PROJ-225)\n>\n> - React.lazy() + Suspense for RevenueChart, ForecastChart, AnalyticsGrid\n> - Skeleton fallback components: RevenueChartSkeleton, ForecastChartSkeleton,\n>   AnalyticsGridSkeleton (neutral-300, animate-pulse, staggered delay)\n> - ErrorBoundary wraps each Suspense (handles lazy-load failures)\n> - Fast widgets (KPITiles, StatusBars, ActivityFeed) load immediately\n> - chart-fade-in CSS wrapper for 300ms opacity transition on reveal\n> All 4 Dashboard tests passing.'\n\n  [feat/proj-225-dashboard-lazy-load a8f2c71]\n  feat(dashboard): lazy-load heavy chart components with skeleton\n  2 files changed, 110 insertions(+), 22 deletions(-)\n\n(developer: PROJ-225 core implementation done. need to add the\n chart-fade-in CSS and measure with React DevTools Profiler later.)\n",
+      "audio_snippets": [],
+      "ground_truth": {
+        "task_key": "PROJ-225",
+        "session_type": "task",
+        "reasoning": "VS Code session implementing PROJ-225 dashboard lazy-loading. Developer opens Dashboard/index.tsx (8 static chart imports), creates new branch feat/proj-225-dashboard-lazy-load, prompts Claude Code to convert 3 heavy charts to React.lazy() + Suspense with skeleton fallbacks and ErrorBoundary. Claude Code discovers existing ErrorBoundary, writes Skeleton/index.tsx (3 skeleton components with Tailwind animate-pulse, staggered delays, Figma-matched proportions), updates Dashboard/index.tsx (lazy imports, Suspense+ErrorBoundary wrappers, chart-fade-in). Runs tsc (clean), runs Dashboard tests (4/4). Commits. Core PROJ-225 implementation done.",
+        "difficulty": "easy",
+        "scoreable": true
+      },
+      "design_notes": "EASY PROJ-225 case — new branch feat/proj-225-dashboard-lazy-load, files changed are Dashboard/index.tsx and Skeleton/index.tsx, commit message names PROJ-225. Potential confusion with PROJ-230 (CSV export, also 'dashboard/reports area') is avoided because session 10 clearly shows React.lazy() / Suspense / skeleton code, not CSV export logic. The design-continuity thread from session 9 (Figma review) to session 10 (implementation) demonstrates end-to-end PROJ-225 work. Medium-difficulty potential: PROJ-225 and PROJ-230 share 'dashboard' vocabulary — but the technical artifacts (React.lazy, Suspense, Skeleton) are unambiguous."
+    },
+    {
+      "id": 11,
+      "app_name": "Code",
+      "started_at": "2026-05-27T11:40:00+05:30",
+      "ended_at": null,
+      "duration_s": 134,
+      "category": "coding",
+      "confidence": 0.96,
+      "session_text_source": "ocr",
+      "window_titles": [
+        {
+          "window_name": "src/types/webhook.ts — zuno-app — Visual Studio Code",
+          "count": 2
+        },
+        {
+          "window_name": "tests/workers/webhook-retry.test.ts — zuno-app — Visual Studio Code",
+          "count": 4
+        },
+        {
+          "window_name": "Terminal — zsh — zuno-app",
+          "count": 5
+        }
+      ],
+      "session_text": "[11:40:00]\nVisual Studio Code\nWindow: zuno-app — Visual Studio Code\nBranch: feat/webhook-retry  (switching back from PROJ-225 branch)\n\n$ git stash  # stash PROJ-225 work\n$ git checkout feat/webhook-retry\n  Switched to branch 'feat/webhook-retry'\n\nActive tabs:\n  src/types/webhook.ts     <- ACTIVE  (const enum fix for PR #88)\n  tests/workers/webhook-retry.test.ts  (will expand)\n\n[11:40:15]\nVS Code — src/types/webhook.ts  (existing file)\n\n  1   // zuno-app — webhook types\n  2   \n  3   export enum WebhookStatus {\n  4     Pending = 'pending',\n  5     Success = 'success',\n  6     Failed  = 'failed',\n  7     Dead    = 'dead',\n  8   }\n  9   \n 10   export interface WebhookEvent {\n 11     id:           string\n 12     targetUrl:    string\n 13     payload:      Record<string, unknown>\n 14     deliveryId:   string\n 15     attemptCount: number\n 16     lastAttemptAt: Date | null\n 17     nextRetryAt:  Date | null\n 18     status:       WebhookStatus\n 19     createdAt:    Date\n 20   }\n 21   \n 22   export interface DeliveryAttempt {\n 23     eventId:    string\n 24     attemptNum: number\n 25     statusCode: number | null\n 26     error:      string | null\n 27     deliveryId: string\n 28     sentAt:     Date\n 29   }\n\n(developer: fixing Alex's nit -- enum -> const enum for tree-shaking)\n\n[11:40:30]\nVS Code — src/types/webhook.ts  (editing line 3)\n(developer manually changes 'enum' to 'const enum' on line 3)\n\n  3   export const enum WebhookStatus {\n\nCmd+S  (save)\n\n[11:40:40]\nVS Code — Terminal\n\n$ npx tsc --noEmit\n  (exit 0)\n\n$ npm test -- --testPathPattern=webhook --verbose\n  PASS tests/workers/webhook-retry.test.ts\n    WebhookRetry\n      ✓ calculateNextRetryAt returns correct backoff intervals  (8ms)\n      ✓ calculateNextRetryAt caps at 30s total window  (3ms)\n      ✓ processWebhookEvent retries on network failure  (24ms)\n  Tests: 3 passed  |  Time: 1.1s\n\n(developer: const enum fix is clean. existing tests still pass.)\n\n[11:41:00]\nVS Code — Terminal  (Claude Code — scaffold full integration test suite)\n\n> PROJ-201: write the full integration test suite for webhook retry.\n  File: tests/workers/webhook-retry.test.ts (currently 3 tests, expand it).\n  Cover all acceptance criteria:\n  1. All 5 backoff intervals (1s, 2s, 4s, 8s, 16s capped at 30s)\n  2. No retry on 4xx HTTP responses (permanent failure)\n  3. Retry on 5xx and network errors\n  4. Circuit breaker: 3 consecutive failures from same targetUrl -> status Dead\n  5. Idempotency: each retry attempt gets a unique delivery_id (UUID)\n  6. Jitter: retry interval includes ±5% random jitter\n  7. Retention: pruneFailedEvents() removes events older than 7 days\n  8. Persistence: simulate process restart -- events survive and retry correctly\n     (use an in-process store restart simulation, not actual kill)\n  Use Jest fake timers for time-sensitive tests.\n  Mock the HTTP fetch for webhook delivery.\n\n● Claude is thinking...\n\n  ✓ Read tests/workers/webhook-retry.test.ts  (existing 3 tests)\n  ✓ Read src/workers/webhook-retry.ts\n  ✓ Read src/types/webhook.ts\n  ✓ Read src/db/webhook-events.ts\n\n  Writing expanded test suite...\n\n  ✎ Writing tests/workers/webhook-retry.test.ts\n  ─────────────────────────────────────────\n  import { jest } from '@jest/globals'\n  import { calculateNextRetryAt, processWebhookEvent,\n           WebhookRetryWorker } from '../../src/workers/webhook-retry'\n  import { WebhookStatus } from '../../src/types/webhook'\n  import { inMemoryWebhookStore } from '../../src/db/webhook-events'\n\n  // Mock fetch for HTTP delivery\n  const mockFetch = jest.fn()\n  global.fetch = mockFetch\n\n  beforeEach(() => {\n    mockFetch.mockReset()\n    inMemoryWebhookStore.clear()\n    jest.useFakeTimers()\n  })\n\n  afterEach(() => {\n    jest.useRealTimers()\n  })\n\n  describe('calculateNextRetryAt', () => {\n    it('attempt 1: retries after 1s', () => {\n      const now = new Date('2026-05-27T10:00:00Z')\n      const next = calculateNextRetryAt(1, now)\n      const diffMs = next.getTime() - now.getTime()\n      expect(diffMs).toBeGreaterThanOrEqual(950)   // 1s - 5% jitter\n      expect(diffMs).toBeLessThanOrEqual(1050)     // 1s + 5% jitter\n    })\n    it('attempt 2: retries after ~2s', () => { /* same pattern */ })\n    it('attempt 3: retries after ~4s', () => { /* same pattern */ })\n    it('attempt 4: retries after ~8s', () => { /* same pattern */ })\n    it('attempt 5: capped at 30s total', () => {\n      const now = new Date('2026-05-27T10:00:00Z')\n      // attempt 5 base = 16s, but total (1+2+4+8+16=31s) exceeds 30s cap\n      // so attempt 5 should be capped: next_retry = now + (30 - 15) = now + 15s\n      const next = calculateNextRetryAt(5, now)\n      const diffSecs = (next.getTime() - now.getTime()) / 1000\n      expect(diffSecs).toBeGreaterThanOrEqual(14.25)  // 15s - 5% jitter\n      expect(diffSecs).toBeLessThanOrEqual(15.75)     // 15s + 5% jitter\n    })\n  })\n\n  describe('HTTP response handling', () => {\n    it('does NOT retry on 400 (permanent failure)', async () => {\n      mockFetch.mockResolvedValue({ ok: false, status: 400 })\n      const event = createTestEvent()\n      await processWebhookEvent(event)\n      const updated = inMemoryWebhookStore.get(event.id)\n      expect(updated!.status).toBe(WebhookStatus.Failed)\n      expect(updated!.attemptCount).toBe(1)  // no retries\n    })\n    it('does NOT retry on 404 (permanent failure)', async () => {\n      mockFetch.mockResolvedValue({ ok: false, status: 404 })\n      const event = createTestEvent()\n      await processWebhookEvent(event)\n      expect(inMemoryWebhookStore.get(event.id)!.status).toBe(WebhookStatus.Failed)\n    })\n    it('DOES retry on 500 (transient failure)', async () => {\n      mockFetch.mockResolvedValue({ ok: false, status: 500 })\n      const event = createTestEvent()\n      await processWebhookEvent(event)\n      const updated = inMemoryWebhookStore.get(event.id)\n      expect(updated!.status).toBe(WebhookStatus.Pending)  // still pending, retry queued\n      expect(updated!.nextRetryAt).not.toBeNull()\n    })\n    it('DOES retry on network error (fetch throws)', async () => {\n      mockFetch.mockRejectedValue(new Error('ECONNREFUSED'))\n      const event = createTestEvent()\n      await processWebhookEvent(event)\n      expect(inMemoryWebhookStore.get(event.id)!.nextRetryAt).not.toBeNull()\n    })\n  })\n\n  describe('circuit breaker', () => {\n    it('marks target as Dead after 3 consecutive failures', async () => {\n      mockFetch.mockResolvedValue({ ok: false, status: 500 })\n      const targetUrl = 'https://dead-target.example.com/webhook'\n      // Deliver 3 events to same target, all fail\n      for (let i = 0; i < 3; i++) {\n        const event = createTestEvent({ targetUrl })\n        await processWebhookEvent(event)\n      }\n      const target = inMemoryWebhookStore.getTarget(targetUrl)\n      expect(target!.status).toBe('dead')\n      expect(target!.consecutiveFailures).toBe(3)\n    })\n    it('stops retrying events to a dead target', async () => {\n      mockFetch.mockResolvedValue({ ok: false, status: 500 })\n      const targetUrl = 'https://dead-target.example.com/webhook'\n      // Mark target as dead\n      inMemoryWebhookStore.setTargetDead(targetUrl)\n      const event = createTestEvent({ targetUrl })\n      await processWebhookEvent(event)\n      // fetch should NOT have been called\n      expect(mockFetch).not.toHaveBeenCalled()\n      expect(inMemoryWebhookStore.get(event.id)!.status).toBe(WebhookStatus.Dead)\n    })\n    it('resets circuit breaker on successful delivery', async () => {\n      const targetUrl = 'https://recovering-target.example.com/webhook'\n      inMemoryWebhookStore.setTargetFailures(targetUrl, 2)  // 2 failures, not yet dead\n      mockFetch.mockResolvedValue({ ok: true, status: 200 })\n      const event = createTestEvent({ targetUrl })\n      await processWebhookEvent(event)\n      const target = inMemoryWebhookStore.getTarget(targetUrl)\n      expect(target!.consecutiveFailures).toBe(0)  // reset on success\n    })\n  })\n\n  describe('idempotency', () => {\n    it('each retry attempt has a unique delivery_id', async () => {\n      mockFetch.mockResolvedValue({ ok: false, status: 500 })\n      const event = createTestEvent()\n      // First attempt\n      await processWebhookEvent(event)\n      const attempt1DeliveryId = mockFetch.mock.calls[0][1]?.body?.deliveryId\n      // Advance timer to trigger retry\n      jest.advanceTimersByTime(1100)  // 1s + buffer\n      await processWebhookEvent(event)\n      const attempt2DeliveryId = mockFetch.mock.calls[1][1]?.body?.deliveryId\n      expect(attempt1DeliveryId).not.toBe(attempt2DeliveryId)  // unique UUIDs\n    })\n  })\n\n  describe('persistence simulation', () => {\n    it('pending event survives store reload and retries', () => {\n      const event = createTestEvent()\n      inMemoryWebhookStore.set(event.id, {\n        ...event, status: WebhookStatus.Pending,\n        nextRetryAt: new Date(Date.now() - 1000),  // retry overdue\n        attemptCount: 1,\n      })\n      // Simulate store reload by getting retryable events\n      const retryable = inMemoryWebhookStore.getRetryable()\n      expect(retryable).toContainEqual(expect.objectContaining({ id: event.id }))\n    })\n  })\n\n  describe('retention', () => {\n    it('pruneFailedEvents removes events older than 7 days', () => {\n      const oldEvent = createTestEvent()\n      inMemoryWebhookStore.set(oldEvent.id, {\n        ...oldEvent, status: WebhookStatus.Failed,\n        createdAt: new Date(Date.now() - 8 * 24 * 60 * 60 * 1000),  // 8 days old\n      })\n      const pruned = inMemoryWebhookStore.pruneFailedEvents(7)\n      expect(pruned).toBe(1)\n      expect(inMemoryWebhookStore.get(oldEvent.id)).toBeUndefined()\n    })\n    it('does not prune events younger than 7 days', () => {\n      const recentEvent = createTestEvent()\n      inMemoryWebhookStore.set(recentEvent.id, {\n        ...recentEvent, status: WebhookStatus.Failed,\n        createdAt: new Date(Date.now() - 3 * 24 * 60 * 60 * 1000),  // 3 days old\n      })\n      expect(inMemoryWebhookStore.pruneFailedEvents(7)).toBe(0)\n    })\n  })\n\n  function createTestEvent(overrides = {}) {\n    return {\n      id:            crypto.randomUUID(),\n      targetUrl:     'https://test.example.com/webhook',\n      payload:       { event: 'test.created', data: { id: 1 } },\n      deliveryId:    crypto.randomUUID(),\n      attemptCount:  0,\n      lastAttemptAt: null,\n      nextRetryAt:   null,\n      status:        WebhookStatus.Pending,\n      createdAt:     new Date(),\n      ...overrides,\n    }\n  }\n  ─────────────────────────────────────────\n  ✓ Wrote tests/workers/webhook-retry.test.ts  (142 lines)\n\n  Note: some test stubs need implementation hooks in webhook-retry.ts:\n  - inMemoryWebhookStore.setTargetDead()\n  - inMemoryWebhookStore.setTargetFailures()\n  - inMemoryWebhookStore.getRetryable()\n  - inMemoryWebhookStore.pruneFailedEvents()\n  These may not exist yet. Run tests to see what's missing.\n\n[11:43:30]\nVS Code — Terminal\n\n$ npm test -- --testPathPattern=webhook-retry --verbose\n  FAIL tests/workers/webhook-retry.test.ts\n    ● circuit breaker › stops retrying events to a dead target\n      TypeError: inMemoryWebhookStore.setTargetDead is not a function\n\n(developer: needs to add setTargetDead + setTargetFailures test helpers)\n\n> Add test helper methods to src/db/webhook-events.ts:\n  - setTargetDead(targetUrl): marks a target as dead in the store\n  - setTargetFailures(targetUrl, count): sets consecutiveFailures count\n  These are only needed for tests -- mark them @visibleForTesting.\n\n  ✎ Editing src/db/webhook-events.ts  (+12 lines)\n  + /** @visibleForTesting */\n  + setTargetDead(targetUrl: string): void {\n  +   this.targets.set(targetUrl, { status: 'dead', consecutiveFailures: 3 })\n  + }\n  + /** @visibleForTesting */\n  + setTargetFailures(targetUrl: string, count: number): void {\n  +   const existing = this.targets.get(targetUrl) ?? { status: 'active', consecutiveFailures: 0 }\n  +   this.targets.set(targetUrl, { ...existing, consecutiveFailures: count })\n  + }\n  ✓ Wrote src/db/webhook-events.ts\n\n$ npm test -- --testPathPattern=webhook-retry --verbose\n  PASS tests/workers/webhook-retry.test.ts\n    calculateNextRetryAt  5 passed\n    HTTP response handling  4 passed\n    circuit breaker  3 passed\n    idempotency  1 passed\n    persistence simulation  1 passed\n    retention  2 passed\n  Tests: 16 passed  |  Time: 2.8s\n\n[11:44:20]\nVS Code — Terminal  (commit)\n\n$ git add src/types/webhook.ts tests/workers/webhook-retry.test.ts src/db/webhook-events.ts\n$ git commit -m 'test(webhook): full integration test suite for retry logic (PROJ-201)\n>\n> - Fix: enum -> const enum in WebhookStatus (PR #88 nit from Alex)\n> - Tests: calculateNextRetryAt jitter bounds, all 5 backoff intervals\n> - Tests: 4xx no-retry, 5xx retry, network error retry\n> - Tests: circuit breaker (3 failures -> dead, no-fetch on dead, reset on success)\n> - Tests: idempotency (unique delivery_id per attempt)\n> - Tests: persistence simulation (overdue pending event is retryable)\n> - Tests: retention (pruneFailedEvents removes events >7 days old)\n> - Add @visibleForTesting helpers: setTargetDead, setTargetFailures\n> 16/16 tests passing'\n\n  [feat/webhook-retry d4c7e02]\n  test(webhook): full integration test suite for retry logic\n  3 files changed, 156 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)\n\n(developer: PROJ-201 integration tests done. 16/16 passing.\n Next: implement the circuit breaker detection in webhook-retry.ts itself.\n But first: lunch. It's 11:44. Pair session with Alex at 13:00.)\n",
+      "audio_snippets": [],
+      "ground_truth": {
+        "task_key": "PROJ-201",
+        "session_type": "task",
+        "reasoning": "VS Code session writing the PROJ-201 integration test suite. Developer fixes the WebhookStatus const enum (PR #88 nit), then uses Claude Code to scaffold 16 integration tests covering all acceptance criteria: backoff interval jitter bounds, 4xx no-retry, 5xx/network retry, circuit breaker (3 failures = dead, no-fetch on dead target, reset on success), idempotency (unique delivery_id per attempt), persistence simulation, retention pruning. Fixes a missing test helper (setTargetDead), reruns until 16/16 pass. Commits.",
+        "difficulty": "medium",
+        "scoreable": true
+      },
+      "design_notes": "MEDIUM PROJ-201 case. The test descriptions mention 'circuit breaker', 'idempotency', 'delivery_id', 'webhook target dead' — vocabulary that also appears in PROJ-242 (Slack notification for dead webhook targets). The discriminator: all test code references webhook-retry.ts, WebhookStatus enum, inMemoryWebhookStore — the internal retry worker, not the Slack notification integration. The circuit breaker test ('stops retrying to dead target') could superficially suggest PROJ-242 (notifying Slack when target is dead), but the implementation is in the retry worker, not a notification service. Medium difficulty because the circuit breaker alerting language overlaps with PROJ-242's alerting scope."
+    },
+    {
+      "id": 12,
+      "app_name": "Activity Monitor",
+      "started_at": "2026-05-27T11:45:10+05:30",
+      "ended_at": "2026-05-27T11:45:40+05:30",
+      "duration_s": 7,
+      "category": "system",
+      "confidence": 0.95,
+      "session_text_source": "ocr",
+      "window_titles": [
+        {
+          "window_name": "Activity Monitor",
+          "count": 2
+        }
+      ],
+      "session_text": "[11:45:10]\nActivity Monitor — macOS\n  CPU  |  Memory  |  Energy  |  Disk  |  Network\n\nMemory tab  (active)\n  Physical Memory: 16.00 GB\n  Memory Used: 11.4 GB\n  Wired Memory: 2.1 GB\n  Compressed: 1.8 GB\n  Memory Pressure: Normal\n\nTop processes (Memory):\n  Google Chrome (Helper)  1.2 GB\n  Slack                   610 MB\n  VS Code                 540 MB\n  node (dev server)       280 MB\n  Figma (Desktop)         210 MB\n  Zoom                    190 MB\n\n(developer: Chrome is using too much. will quit Figma desktop since design\n sync is done. No memory pressure -- all good.)\n(quits Figma Desktop  ->  Figma process disappears from list)\n(closes Activity Monitor)\n",
+      "audio_snippets": [],
+      "ground_truth": {
+        "task_key": "none",
+        "session_type": "untracked",
+        "reasoning": "30-second Activity Monitor session checking memory usage. Developer notices Figma is still running (design sync is done) and quits it. No code written, no task work.",
+        "difficulty": "easy",
+        "scoreable": true
+      },
+      "design_notes": "EASY untracked case. Activity Monitor with no ticket context. Identical failure mode to Dev A session 47. The process list mentioning 'node (dev server)' and VS Code confirms it's a developer machine but the session itself is OS housekeeping. Low tripwire risk."
+    },
+    {
+      "id": 13,
+      "app_name": "Zoom",
+      "started_at": "2026-05-27T13:01:05+05:30",
+      "ended_at": null,
+      "duration_s": 60,
+      "category": "communication",
+      "confidence": 0.94,
+      "session_text_source": "ocr",
+      "window_titles": [
+        {
+          "window_name": "Zoom — PROJ-210 auth pair session",
+          "count": 8
+        }
+      ],
+      "session_text": "[13:01:05]\nZoom — Video Conference\nMeeting: PROJ-210 auth pair session  |  Host: Alex Rodriguez\nParticipants: Alex Rodriguez (host, screen sharing), Zoe Dev (me), [2 others joined late]\nDuration: 00:01:05  |  Audio: on  |  Video: on\n\n[13:01:20]\nZoom — Alex's screen share visible\nAlex sharing: VS Code — src/context/AuthContext.tsx\n\nAlex's screen (OCR):\n  VS Code — src/context/AuthContext.tsx\n  Branch: feat/proj-210-auth-frontend\n\n  import React, { createContext, useContext, useRef, useEffect, useCallback } from 'react'\n  import { api } from '../api/client'\n\n  interface AuthContextValue {\n    userId: string | null\n    email:  string | null\n    login:  (email: string, password: string) => Promise<void>\n    logout: () => Promise<void>\n    getCsrfToken: () => string\n  }\n\n  const AuthContext = createContext<AuthContextValue | null>(null)\n\n  export function AuthProvider({ children }: { children: React.ReactNode }) {\n    const csrfRef = useRef<string | null>(null)\n    const [userId, setUserId] = React.useState<string | null>(null)\n    const [email, setEmail]   = React.useState<string | null>(null)\n\n    const refreshCsrf = useCallback(async () => {\n      const { csrfToken, maxAge } = await api.get('/auth/csrf-token')\n      csrfRef.current = csrfToken\n      if (maxAge) {\n        setTimeout(refreshCsrf, maxAge * 0.9 * 1000)\n      }\n    }, [])\n\n    useEffect(() => { refreshCsrf() }, [refreshCsrf])\n\n[13:04:30]\nZoom — Alex's screen share  (scrolled down)\n\n    const login = async (email: string, password: string) => {\n      const { csrfToken, maxAge } = await api.post('/auth/login', { email, password })\n      csrfRef.current = csrfToken\n      const me = await api.get('/auth/me')\n      setUserId(me.userId)\n      setEmail(me.email)\n      if (maxAge) setTimeout(refreshCsrf, maxAge * 0.9 * 1000)\n    }\n\n    const logout = async () => {\n      await api.delete('/auth/session')\n      csrfRef.current = null\n      setUserId(null)\n      setEmail(null)\n    }\n\n    const getCsrfToken = () => {\n      if (!csrfRef.current) throw new Error('[CSRF] token not yet initialised')\n      return csrfRef.current\n    }\n\n    return (\n      <AuthContext.Provider value={{ userId, email, login, logout, getCsrfToken }}>\n        {children}\n      </AuthContext.Provider>\n    )\n  }\n\nAlex (audio):\n  'So the getCsrfToken throws if csrfRef is null -- that matches what we\n   discussed in Slack. I also wired the X-CSRF-Token header into the axios\n   interceptor in src/api/client.ts -- want to look at that next?'\n\n[13:07:15]\nZoom — Alex's screen share  (switches to src/api/client.ts)\n\n  VS Code — src/api/client.ts\n\n  import axios from 'axios'\n  import { getCsrfToken } from '../context/AuthContext'  // circular? need to check\n\n  export const api = axios.create({ baseURL: '/api', withCredentials: true })\n\n  api.interceptors.request.use((config) => {\n    const method = config.method?.toUpperCase()\n    if (['POST', 'PUT', 'PATCH', 'DELETE'].includes(method ?? '')) {\n      try {\n        config.headers['X-CSRF-Token'] = getCsrfToken()\n      } catch {\n        // CSRF token not yet initialised -- request will fail with 403\n        // This should only happen during app startup before useEffect runs\n      }\n    }\n    return config\n  })\n\nZoe (audio):\n  'Wait -- importing getCsrfToken from AuthContext into api/client.ts might\n   create a circular dependency. AuthContext imports api.get, api imports\n   getCsrfToken from AuthContext. Let me check.'\n\n[13:10:45]\nZoom — Alex's screen share  (terminal)\n\n  $ npx tsc --noEmit\n  src/api/client.ts(2,X): error TS2345:\n    Circular reference detected: api/client.ts -> context/AuthContext.tsx -> api/client.ts\n\nAlex (audio):\n  'Yep, circular. How do we fix it?'\n\nZoe (audio):\n  'Pass getCsrfToken as a callback to the interceptor at runtime instead of\n   importing it at module load time. We can use a module-level variable:\n   let csrfGetter: (() => string) | null = null\n   export function setCsrfGetter(fn: () => string) { csrfGetter = fn }\n   Then in AuthProvider, after setting up getCsrfToken, call setCsrfGetter(getCsrfToken).\n   The interceptor checks csrfGetter?.() instead of importing directly.'\n\n[13:14:00]\nZoom — Alex's screen share  (Alex applies the fix)\n\n  src/api/client.ts  (updated)\n  let _csrfGetter: (() => string) | null = null\n  export function setCsrfGetter(fn: () => string): void { _csrfGetter = fn }\n\n  api.interceptors.request.use((config) => {\n    const method = config.method?.toUpperCase()\n    if (['POST', 'PUT', 'PATCH', 'DELETE'].includes(method ?? '')) {\n      const token = _csrfGetter?.()\n      if (token) config.headers['X-CSRF-Token'] = token\n    }\n    return config\n  })\n\n  src/context/AuthContext.tsx (AuthProvider, after getCsrfToken is defined)\n  + import { setCsrfGetter } from '../api/client'\n  + useEffect(() => { setCsrfGetter(getCsrfToken) }, [getCsrfToken])\n\n  $ npx tsc --noEmit\n  (exit 0)\n\nAlex (audio): 'Clean! Nice pattern.'\nZoe (audio):  'Yeah, the late-binding getter is the cleanest fix for the circular.\n  Let's run the tests and then I'll push my backend branch for your review.'\n\n[13:18:30]\nZoom — Alex's screen share  (running frontend tests)\n\n  $ npm test -- --testPathPattern=AuthContext\n  PASS src/context/AuthContext.test.tsx\n    AuthProvider\n      ✓ fetches CSRF token on mount  (31ms)\n      ✓ stores CSRF token in ref  (12ms)\n      ✓ getCsrfToken throws when ref is null  (8ms)\n      ✓ login sets userId and email  (22ms)\n      ✓ logout clears userId, email, and csrfRef  (15ms)\n      ✓ CSRF token is included in POST request header  (19ms)\n  Tests: 6 passed  |  Time: 1.7s\n\nAlex (audio): 'All green. I'll push this to feat/proj-210-auth-frontend\n  and open PR #93 now. You should be able to test on staging once both\n  PRs (#92 and #93) are merged.'\n\nZoe (audio): 'Perfect. I'll merge #92 into staging as soon as Sarah approves it.\n  Thanks for the pair session!'\n\n[13:22:00]\nZoom — Meeting ended\n  Duration: 21 minutes\n  Participants: Alex Rodriguez, Zoe Dev\n(developer closes Zoom)\n",
+      "audio_snippets": [
+        {
+          "timestamp": "2026-05-27T13:07:40+05:30",
+          "duration_s": 14,
+          "text": "Wait -- importing getCsrfToken from AuthContext into api/client.ts might create a circular dependency. AuthContext imports api.get, api imports getCsrfToken from AuthContext. Let me check."
+        },
+        {
+          "timestamp": "2026-05-27T13:12:10+05:30",
+          "duration_s": 22,
+          "text": "Pass getCsrfToken as a callback to the interceptor at runtime instead of importing it at module load time. We can use a module-level variable: let csrfGetter. Then in AuthProvider, after setting up getCsrfToken, call setCsrfGetter. The interceptor checks csrfGetter instead of importing directly."
+        }
+      ],
+      "ground_truth": {
+        "task_key": "PROJ-210",
+        "session_type": "overhead",
+        "reasoning": "21-minute Zoom pair session with Alex for PROJ-210 frontend. Developer watches Alex's screen share showing AuthContext.tsx (useRef CSRF storage, refreshCsrf on mount, getCsrfToken throws when null) and api/client.ts (axios interceptor with X-CSRF-Token header). Developer spots a circular dependency between api/client.ts and AuthContext.tsx, suggests a late-binding getter pattern (setCsrfGetter). Alex applies the fix, tsc compiles clean, frontend auth tests pass (6/6). Alex will open PR #93. This is a video call coordination session — Zoe is watching and talking, not editing files directly.",
+        "difficulty": "medium",
+        "scoreable": true
+      },
+      "design_notes": "MEDIUM overhead case — developer is watching a pair session on Zoom, not editing files themselves. The OCR shows Alex's VS Code window (screen share), which contains PROJ-210 code. The failure mode: classifier sees TypeScript code (AuthContext.tsx, api/client.ts, CSRF token, useRef) and maps to PROJ-210 task work. Discriminator: window title is Zoom, not VS Code. Zoe's role is coordination and problem-solving via audio (detecting the circular dependency), not file editing. Similar to Dev A session 48 (FaceTime with Aditya) but with more visible code in the screen share."
+    },
+    {
+      "id": 14,
+      "app_name": "Code",
+      "started_at": "2026-05-27T14:35:00+05:30",
+      "ended_at": null,
+      "duration_s": 79,
+      "category": "coding",
+      "confidence": 0.96,
+      "session_text_source": "ocr",
+      "window_titles": [
+        {
+          "window_name": "src/workers/webhook-retry.ts — zuno-app — Visual Studio Code",
+          "count": 6
+        },
+        {
+          "window_name": "src/db/webhook-events.ts — zuno-app — Visual Studio Code",
+          "count": 2
+        },
+        {
+          "window_name": "Terminal — zsh — zuno-app",
+          "count": 4
+        }
+      ],
+      "session_text": "[14:35:00]\nVisual Studio Code\nWindow: zuno-app — Visual Studio Code\nBranch: feat/webhook-retry\nActive tabs:\n  src/workers/webhook-retry.ts  <- ACTIVE\n  src/db/webhook-events.ts\n\nStatus bar: TypeScript  |  Branch: feat/webhook-retry  |  0 errors\n(developer: back from sync with Sarah. she confirmed circuit breaker is in scope.\n now implementing it in webhook-retry.ts)\n\n[14:35:15]\nVS Code — src/workers/webhook-retry.ts  (existing file before changes)\n\n  1   // zuno-app — webhook retry worker\n  2   import { inMemoryWebhookStore } from '../db/webhook-events'\n  3   import { WebhookStatus } from '../types/webhook'\n  4   import logger from '../utils/logger'\n  5   \n  6   const MAX_RETRIES = 5\n  7   const MAX_WINDOW_SECS = 30\n  8   \n  9   export function calculateNextRetryAt(attempt: number, now = new Date()): Date {\n 10     const baseDelayMs = Math.pow(2, attempt - 1) * 1000\n 11     const cappedMs = Math.min(baseDelayMs,\n 12       (MAX_WINDOW_SECS - (Math.pow(2, attempt-1) - 1)) * 1000)\n 13     const jitterMs = cappedMs * (0.95 + Math.random() * 0.1)  // ±5%\n 14     return new Date(now.getTime() + jitterMs)\n 15   }\n 16   \n 17   export async function processWebhookEvent(event: WebhookEvent): Promise<void> {\n 18     if (event.attemptCount >= MAX_RETRIES) {\n 19       inMemoryWebhookStore.update(event.id, { status: WebhookStatus.Failed })\n 20       return\n 21     }\n 22     let statusCode: number | null = null\n 23     let errorMsg: string | null = null\n 24     try {\n 25       const deliveryId = crypto.randomUUID()\n 26       const res = await fetch(event.targetUrl, {\n 27         method: 'POST',\n 28         headers: {\n 29           'Content-Type': 'application/json',\n 30           'X-Zuno-Delivery-ID': deliveryId,\n 31         },\n 32         body: JSON.stringify(event.payload),\n 33       })\n 34       statusCode = res.status\n 35       if (res.ok) {\n 36         inMemoryWebhookStore.update(event.id, { status: WebhookStatus.Success })\n 37         return\n 38       }\n 39       if (statusCode >= 400 && statusCode < 500) {\n 40         inMemoryWebhookStore.update(event.id, { status: WebhookStatus.Failed })\n 41         return  // 4xx: permanent failure, no retry\n 42       }\n 43     } catch (err) {\n 44       errorMsg = (err as Error).message\n 45     }\n 46     // Schedule next retry\n 47     const nextRetry = calculateNextRetryAt(event.attemptCount + 1)\n 48     inMemoryWebhookStore.update(event.id, {\n 49       attemptCount: event.attemptCount + 1,\n 50       nextRetryAt: nextRetry,\n 51       lastAttemptAt: new Date(),\n 52     })\n 53   }\n\n(developer: the circuit breaker logic is missing. need to:\n 1. before delivery: check if target is marked dead -> skip + mark WebhookStatus.Dead\n 2. after failed delivery: increment consecutiveFailures on target\n 3. if consecutiveFailures >= 3: mark target dead, log an alert\n 4. after successful delivery: reset consecutiveFailures to 0\n)\n\n[14:35:55]\nVS Code — Terminal  (Claude Code)\n\n> PROJ-201: implement the circuit breaker in src/workers/webhook-retry.ts.\n  Before each delivery attempt, check if the target is marked dead\n  (inMemoryWebhookStore.isTargetDead(targetUrl)). If dead, mark event\n  as WebhookStatus.Dead and return without calling fetch.\n  After each failed delivery: call inMemoryWebhookStore.recordTargetFailure(targetUrl).\n  If recordTargetFailure returns true (meaning 3 consecutive failures reached),\n  log a structured Datadog alert: logger.error({ event: 'circuit_breaker_triggered',\n  targetUrl, consecutiveFailures: 3 }).\n  After each successful delivery: call inMemoryWebhookStore.resetTargetFailures(targetUrl).\n  Also add the isTargetDead, recordTargetFailure, resetTargetFailures methods to\n  src/db/webhook-events.ts if they don't exist.\n\n● Claude is thinking...\n\n  ✓ Read src/workers/webhook-retry.ts\n  ✓ Read src/db/webhook-events.ts\n  Search: isTargetDead → not found → will add\n\n  ✎ Editing src/db/webhook-events.ts  (add circuit breaker methods)\n  ─────────────────────────────────────────\n  + isTargetDead(targetUrl: string): boolean {\n  +   return this.targets.get(targetUrl)?.status === 'dead'\n  + }\n  + \n  + recordTargetFailure(targetUrl: string): boolean {\n  +   const existing = this.targets.get(targetUrl)\n  +     ?? { status: 'active' as const, consecutiveFailures: 0 }\n  +   const updated = {\n  +     ...existing,\n  +     consecutiveFailures: existing.consecutiveFailures + 1,\n  +   }\n  +   if (updated.consecutiveFailures >= 3) {\n  +     updated.status = 'dead'\n  +   }\n  +   this.targets.set(targetUrl, updated)\n  +   return updated.status === 'dead'  // true if just became dead\n  + }\n  + \n  + resetTargetFailures(targetUrl: string): void {\n  +   const existing = this.targets.get(targetUrl)\n  +   if (existing) {\n  +     this.targets.set(targetUrl, { ...existing, consecutiveFailures: 0, status: 'active' })\n  +   }\n  + }\n  ✓ Wrote src/db/webhook-events.ts  (+20 lines)\n\n  ✎ Editing src/workers/webhook-retry.ts  (add circuit breaker checks)\n  ─────────────────────────────────────────\n  export async function processWebhookEvent(event: WebhookEvent): Promise<void> {\n    // Circuit breaker: skip dead targets\n  +   if (inMemoryWebhookStore.isTargetDead(event.targetUrl)) {\n  +     logger.warn({ event: 'webhook_skipped_dead_target',\n  +       targetUrl: event.targetUrl, eventId: event.id })\n  +     inMemoryWebhookStore.update(event.id, { status: WebhookStatus.Dead })\n  +     return\n  +   }\n    if (event.attemptCount >= MAX_RETRIES) {\n      inMemoryWebhookStore.update(event.id, { status: WebhookStatus.Failed })\n      return\n    }\n    // ... fetch call (unchanged) ...\n    if (res.ok) {\n  +     inMemoryWebhookStore.resetTargetFailures(event.targetUrl)  // reset on success\n      inMemoryWebhookStore.update(event.id, { status: WebhookStatus.Success })\n      return\n    }\n    if (statusCode >= 400 && statusCode < 500) {\n      inMemoryWebhookStore.update(event.id, { status: WebhookStatus.Failed })\n      return\n    }\n    // Record failure for circuit breaker\n  +   const becameDead = inMemoryWebhookStore.recordTargetFailure(event.targetUrl)\n  +   if (becameDead) {\n  +     logger.error({\n  +       event:               'circuit_breaker_triggered',\n  +       targetUrl:           event.targetUrl,\n  +       consecutiveFailures: 3,\n  +       message:             'Webhook target marked as dead after 3 consecutive failures.',\n  +     })\n  +   }\n    // Schedule next retry (or fail if max retries reached)\n    ...\n  }\n  ─────────────────────────────────────────\n  ✓ Wrote src/workers/webhook-retry.ts  (+16 lines)\n\n  Done. The circuit_breaker_triggered log is a Datadog error-level event.\n  In production you'd add a Datadog monitor on this event to alert on-call.\n\n[14:37:10]\nVS Code — Terminal\n\n$ npm test -- --testPathPattern=webhook-retry --verbose\n  PASS tests/workers/webhook-retry.test.ts\n    calculateNextRetryAt          5 passed\n    HTTP response handling         4 passed\n    circuit breaker                3 passed\n    idempotency                    1 passed\n    persistence simulation         1 passed\n    retention                      2 passed\n  Tests: 16 passed  |  Time: 2.9s\n\n$ git add src/workers/webhook-retry.ts src/db/webhook-events.ts\n$ git commit -m 'feat(webhook): implement circuit breaker in retry worker (PROJ-201)\n>\n> - isTargetDead(): skip delivery + mark event Dead if target is dead\n> - recordTargetFailure(): increment consecutive_failures, flip to dead at 3\n> - resetTargetFailures(): reset on any successful delivery\n> - logger.error circuit_breaker_triggered on dead transition (Datadog alert)\n> - All 16 integration tests still passing'\n\n  [feat/webhook-retry e3f8b14]  feat(webhook): implement circuit breaker\n  2 files changed, 36 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)\n\n(developer: PROJ-201 circuit breaker done. the circuit_breaker_triggered Datadog\n alert log is important -- ops team will get paged if a target goes dead.\n Next: add the Datadog observability integration subtask.)\n",
+      "audio_snippets": [],
+      "ground_truth": {
+        "task_key": "PROJ-201",
+        "session_type": "task",
+        "reasoning": "VS Code session implementing PROJ-201 circuit breaker in webhook-retry.ts. Developer reads the existing retry worker (missing circuit breaker checks), prompts Claude Code to add isTargetDead/recordTargetFailure/resetTargetFailures to webhook-events.ts, and add circuit breaker gates to processWebhookEvent: skip dead targets (log warn + mark Dead), reset failures on success, record failure after 5xx/network error, log error 'circuit_breaker_triggered' when target becomes dead. Runs 16 integration tests (all pass). Commits. Files: webhook-retry.ts + webhook-events.ts.",
+        "difficulty": "hard",
+        "scoreable": true
+      },
+      "design_notes": "HARD case — PROJ-201 vs PROJ-242 discrimination. The circuit breaker alert ('circuit_breaker_triggered', 'webhook target marked as dead') uses notification/alerting vocabulary that overlaps with PROJ-242 (Slack notification integration for webhook events). PROJ-242 also involves notifying when a webhook delivery fails repeatedly. The key discriminators: (1) branch is feat/webhook-retry (PROJ-201), not a new feature branch; (2) files edited are webhook-retry.ts and webhook-events.ts (internal retry worker), not a Slack API integration or notification service; (3) the 'alert' is a logger.error Datadog structured log, not a Slack API call; (4) commit message names PROJ-201. A classifier that sees 'circuit_breaker_triggered' and 'webhook target dead' alerting may misclassify as PROJ-242."
+    },
+    {
+      "id": 15,
+      "app_name": "Postman",
+      "started_at": "2026-05-27T14:40:00+05:30",
+      "ended_at": null,
+      "duration_s": 34,
+      "category": "testing",
+      "confidence": 0.82,
+      "session_text_source": "ocr",
+      "window_titles": [
+        {
+          "window_name": "Postman — Zuno Backend",
+          "count": 5
+        }
+      ],
+      "session_text": "[14:40:00]\nPostman — API Testing\nCollection: Zuno Backend  |  Environment: localhost\n\nSidebar:\n  Collections:\n    ▼ Zuno Backend\n        Auth\n          POST /auth/login\n          GET /auth/csrf-token\n          POST /auth/logout\n          GET /auth/okta/redirect\n          POST /auth/okta/callback\n        Webhooks\n          POST /webhooks/events  <- ACTIVE\n          GET /webhooks/events/:id\n          GET /webhooks/events  (list)\n          PATCH /webhooks/targets/:id/re-enable\n        Reports\n          GET /reports\n          GET /reports/export  (CSV, PROJ-230)\n  Environments:\n    localhost (active)  base_url = http://localhost:3000\n    staging             base_url = https://staging.zuno.io\n\n[14:40:20]\nPostman — POST /webhooks/events  (sending a test webhook event)\n\nRequest:\n  Method: POST\n  URL: {{base_url}}/webhooks/events\n  Auth: Bearer {{jwt_token}}  (from env variable)\n  Headers:\n    Content-Type: application/json\n  Body (raw JSON):\n    {\n      \"targetUrl\": \"https://httpbin.org/post\",\n      \"payload\": {\n        \"event\": \"user.created\",\n        \"data\": { \"userId\": \"test-123\", \"email\": \"testuser@example.com\" }\n      }\n    }\n\n(developer clicks Send)\n\nResponse  200 OK  (234ms)\n  {\n    \"id\": \"b7a3d2f1-4e5c-6789-abcd-ef0123456789\",\n    \"targetUrl\": \"https://httpbin.org/post\",\n    \"status\": \"pending\",\n    \"attemptCount\": 0,\n    \"deliveryId\": \"c9d8e7f6-a5b4-3c2d-1e0f-9a8b7c6d5e4f\",\n    \"nextRetryAt\": null,\n    \"createdAt\": \"2026-05-27T09:10:05.000Z\"\n  }\n\n(developer: event created successfully. now testing that the retry worker\n picks it up and delivers to httpbin.org)\n\n[14:41:05]\nPostman — GET /webhooks/events/:id  (checking delivery status)\n\nRequest:\n  Method: GET\n  URL: {{base_url}}/webhooks/events/b7a3d2f1-4e5c-6789-abcd-ef0123456789\n  Auth: Bearer {{jwt_token}}\n\n(developer clicks Send)\n\nResponse  200 OK  (18ms)\n  {\n    \"id\": \"b7a3d2f1-...\",\n    \"targetUrl\": \"https://httpbin.org/post\",\n    \"status\": \"success\",\n    \"attemptCount\": 1,\n    \"lastAttemptAt\": \"2026-05-27T09:10:06.100Z\",\n    \"nextRetryAt\": null,\n    \"deliveryId\": \"c9d8e7f6-...\"\n  }\n\n(developer: status is 'success' -- delivery worked on first attempt.\n httpbin.org echoes the request back with 200.)\n\n[14:41:40]\nPostman — POST /webhooks/events  (testing with a dead endpoint)\n\nRequest body:\n  {\n    \"targetUrl\": \"https://dead-endpoint.example.com/webhook\",\n    \"payload\": { \"event\": \"user.created\", \"data\": { \"userId\": \"test-456\" } }\n  }\n\n(developer sends 3 events to the same dead endpoint to trigger circuit breaker)\n\n(Send #1) Response 200 OK\n  { \"id\": \"e1f2a3b4-...\", \"status\": \"pending\", ... }\n(Send #2) Response 200 OK\n  { \"id\": \"f2e3d4c5-...\", \"status\": \"pending\", ... }\n(Send #3) Response 200 OK\n  { \"id\": \"a3b4c5d6-...\", \"status\": \"pending\", ... }\n\n(developer waits ~5 seconds for retry worker to process events)\n\n[14:42:10]\nPostman — PATCH /webhooks/targets/:id/re-enable  (checking target status)\n\nGET /webhooks/targets?url=dead-endpoint.example.com\n\nResponse 200 OK:\n  {\n    \"targetUrl\": \"https://dead-endpoint.example.com/webhook\",\n    \"status\": \"dead\",\n    \"consecutiveFailures\": 3,\n    \"markedDeadAt\": \"2026-05-27T09:11:58.220Z\"\n  }\n\n(developer: circuit breaker triggered correctly -- target is marked dead after\n 3 consecutive failures. Datadog should have the circuit_breaker_triggered log.)\n(switches to VS Code terminal to check logs)\n\n[14:42:45]\nPostman\n(developer closes Postman, returns to VS Code)\n",
+      "audio_snippets": [],
+      "ground_truth": {
+        "task_key": "PROJ-201",
+        "session_type": "task",
+        "reasoning": "Postman session manually testing the webhook retry and circuit breaker implementation from session 14 (PROJ-201). Developer sends a test webhook event to httpbin.org (succeeds on first attempt), then sends 3 events to a dead endpoint to verify the circuit breaker triggers after 3 consecutive failures. Checks target status API to confirm it's marked dead. This is manual QA for PROJ-201 — the implementation was just committed in session 14.",
+        "difficulty": "hard-decoy",
+        "scoreable": true
+      },
+      "design_notes": "HARD-DECOY — Postman testing webhook endpoints after PROJ-201 circuit breaker implementation. Primary failure mode: classifier sees Postman + webhook testing and maps to overhead (QA is overhead?). Correct label is PROJ-201 task because developer is verifying their own implementation from session 14 — manual verification is part of the task, not a separate overhead activity. The Postman sidebar also shows 'GET /reports/export (CSV, PROJ-230)' which could attract PROJ-230 classification. Discriminator: developer is testing /webhooks endpoints, not /reports. The session is a continuation of session 14's circuit breaker work. Postman-specific difficulty: is manual API testing task work or overhead? For a developer verifying their own implementation immediately after coding it, it's task work."
+    },
+    {
+      "id": 16,
+      "app_name": "Google Chrome",
+      "started_at": "2026-05-27T14:45:00+05:30",
+      "ended_at": null,
+      "duration_s": 46,
+      "category": "research",
+      "confidence": 0.85,
+      "session_text_source": "ocr",
+      "window_titles": [
+        {
+          "window_name": "Datadog Docs — Custom Metrics — Google Chrome",
+          "count": 3
+        },
+        {
+          "window_name": "Datadog Docs — DogStatsD — Google Chrome",
+          "count": 2
+        },
+        {
+          "window_name": "npm — hot-shots — Google Chrome",
+          "count": 2
+        },
+        {
+          "window_name": "GitHub — PR #88 — Google Chrome",
+          "count": 1
+        }
+      ],
+      "session_text": "[14:45:00]\nGoogle Chrome\nTabs:\n  (1) Datadog Docs — Custom Metrics  <- ACTIVE\n  (2) Datadog Docs — StatsD Node.js\n  (3) npm — hot-shots  (Datadog StatsD client)\n  (4) GitHub — Zuno PR #88  (feat/webhook-retry)\n\nURL: https://docs.datadoghq.com/metrics/custom_metrics/\n\n[14:45:12]\nDatadog Docs — Custom Metrics overview\n\nCustom metrics\nCustom metrics allow you to track application-specific KPIs that Datadog\ndoesn't collect automatically. Common use cases:\n  - Business metrics: orders_placed, revenue_per_day\n  - Queue depth: jobs_pending, retry_queue_length\n  - Error rates: webhook_delivery_failed, circuit_breaker_triggered\n\nMetric types:\n  COUNT   — event count since last flush (e.g. webhook_delivery_attempt)\n  GAUGE   — current value (e.g. webhook_retry_queue_depth)\n  HISTOGRAM — distribution (e.g. webhook_delivery_latency_ms)\n  SET     — count of unique values (e.g. unique_webhook_targets)\n\nSubmission methods (Node.js):\n  Using DogStatsD / hot-shots:\n    import StatsD from 'hot-shots'\n    const dogstatsd = new StatsD({ host: 'localhost', port: 8125 })\n    dogstatsd.increment('webhook.delivery.attempt', 1, { target: url })\n    dogstatsd.histogram('webhook.delivery.latency_ms', latencyMs, { target: url })\n    dogstatsd.gauge('webhook.retry_queue.depth', queueDepth)\n\n[14:46:00]\nGoogle Chrome — Datadog Docs StatsD\n(developer clicks tab 2 — StatsD Node.js integration)\n\nURL: https://docs.datadoghq.com/developers/dogstatsd/\n\nDogStatsD Node.js\n  Install: npm install hot-shots\n\n  Configuration:\n    const dogstatsd = new StatsD({\n      host:        process.env.STATSD_HOST ?? 'localhost',\n      port:        8125,\n      prefix:      'zuno.',           // all metrics prefixed zuno.*\n      globalTags:  { env: process.env.NODE_ENV },\n      errorHandler: (err) => logger.error({ event: 'statsd_error', err }),\n    })\n\n  Common patterns:\n    // Count event occurrences\n    dogstatsd.increment('webhook.delivery.attempt', 1, ['target:httpbin.org'])\n    // Record latency distribution\n    dogstatsd.timing('webhook.delivery.latency', endMs - startMs, ['target:httpbin.org'])\n    // Gauge current queue size\n    dogstatsd.gauge('webhook.retry_queue.depth', pendingCount)\n    // Set: count distinct targets that received deliveries\n    dogstatsd.set('webhook.delivery.unique_targets', targetUrl)\n\n  Tags:\n    Pass tags as array ['key:value'] or object { key: 'value' }.\n    Datadog recommends object form for readability.\n    Good tags for webhook metrics: target, status, attempt_num\n\n[14:46:50]\nGoogle Chrome — npm hot-shots\n(developer clicks tab 3 to check hot-shots package)\n\nURL: https://www.npmjs.com/package/hot-shots\n\nhot-shots  v10.0.0\n  Node.js client for Etsy's StatsD server and Datadog DogStatsD\n  Weekly downloads: 1.2M\n  Dependencies: 0\n  TypeScript types: included (bundled)\n\n  API:\n    client.increment(stat, value?, sampleRate?, tags?, callback?)\n    client.decrement(stat, value?, sampleRate?, tags?, callback?)\n    client.gauge(stat, value, sampleRate?, tags?, callback?)\n    client.timing(stat, value, sampleRate?, tags?, callback?)\n    client.histogram(stat, value, sampleRate?, tags?, callback?)\n    client.set(stat, value, sampleRate?, tags?, callback?)\n\n  Tag formats (Datadog style):\n    client.increment('web.request', { method: 'GET', status: '200' })\n    // tags: ['method:GET', 'status:200']\n\n(developer: hot-shots is the right package. zero dependencies, TypeScript included.)\n\n[14:47:20]\nGoogle Chrome — GitHub PR #88\n(developer quickly checks PR #88 status)\n\nGitHub — PR #88 — feat/webhook-retry\n  Title: feat(webhook): implement retry logic with exponential backoff (PROJ-201)\n  Status: Open  |  Reviews: 1 approved (Alex)  |  CI: passing\n  Last commit: d4c7e02 -- test(webhook): full integration test suite for retry logic\n  Reviewer: Alex Rodriguez -- Approved 14:20\n  Comment from Alex: 'LGTM! const enum fix looks good, all tests solid.\n    One thought: once you add the Datadog metrics in the next commit,\n    this PR will be ready to merge. Want to squash before merge?'\n\n(developer: Alex approved PR #88. Need to add Datadog metrics integration\n (PROJ-201 subtask 5) then merge.)\n\n[14:47:50]\nGoogle Chrome\n(developer has gathered everything needed: hot-shots API, metric names, tag format)\n(closes Chrome, opens VS Code to implement PROJ-201 Datadog metrics)\nMetrics to add to webhook-retry.ts:\n  zuno.webhook.delivery.attempt  (count, tags: target, attempt_num)\n  zuno.webhook.delivery.latency  (timing, tags: target, status)\n  zuno.webhook.retry_queue.depth  (gauge, tags: none)\n  zuno.webhook.circuit_breaker.triggered  (count, tags: target)\n",
+      "audio_snippets": [],
+      "ground_truth": {
+        "task_key": "PROJ-201",
+        "session_type": "task",
+        "reasoning": "Chrome session reading Datadog custom metrics documentation and npm hot-shots package spec as direct preparation for implementing PROJ-201 subtask 5 (Datadog/observability integration). Developer reads metric types (COUNT, GAUGE, HISTOGRAM), StatsD Node.js patterns, hot-shots API, and checks PR #88 (approved by Alex, waiting on Datadog metrics commit). Session ends with developer noting the exact metric names to implement. This is implementation-prep research, not casual browsing.",
+        "difficulty": "medium",
+        "scoreable": true
+      },
+      "design_notes": "MEDIUM PROJ-201 case — Chrome research session with clear implementation intent. Discriminator from session 7 (Stripe docs, hard-decoy): here the developer ends by listing exact metric names to implement ('zuno.webhook.delivery.attempt', etc.) and notes PR #88 is waiting on this commit. Session 7 ended with 'was just curiosity'. The GitHub PR check (Alex approved, waiting on Datadog metrics) anchors this to PROJ-201 work. Medium difficulty: Chrome sessions default to overhead/research but this one is direct task prep."
+    },
+    {
+      "id": 17,
+      "app_name": "Code",
+      "started_at": "2026-05-27T14:48:20+05:30",
+      "ended_at": null,
+      "duration_s": 58,
+      "category": "coding",
+      "confidence": 0.97,
+      "session_text_source": "ocr",
+      "window_titles": [
+        {
+          "window_name": "src/workers/webhook-retry.ts — zuno-app — Visual Studio Code",
+          "count": 5
+        },
+        {
+          "window_name": "src/utils/metrics.ts — zuno-app — Visual Studio Code",
+          "count": 2
+        },
+        {
+          "window_name": "Terminal — zsh — zuno-app",
+          "count": 4
+        }
+      ],
+      "session_text": "[14:48:20]\nVisual Studio Code\nBranch: feat/webhook-retry\nActive tabs:\n  src/workers/webhook-retry.ts  <- ACTIVE\n  src/utils/metrics.ts          (new file — will create)\n\n[14:48:30]\nVS Code — Terminal  (Claude Code)\n\n> PROJ-201 subtask 5: add Datadog metrics to webhook-retry.ts using hot-shots.\n  First create src/utils/metrics.ts with a singleton StatsD client:\n    - import StatsD from 'hot-shots'\n    - prefix: 'zuno.'\n    - host: process.env.STATSD_HOST ?? 'localhost'\n    - port: 8125\n    - globalTags: { env: config.NODE_ENV }\n    - errorHandler: logger.error\n    - export: dogstatsd singleton\n  Then update src/workers/webhook-retry.ts to emit these metrics:\n    - dogstatsd.increment('webhook.delivery.attempt', { target, attempt_num })\n    - dogstatsd.timing('webhook.delivery.latency', latencyMs, { target, status })\n    - dogstatsd.gauge('webhook.retry_queue.depth', pendingEventCount)\n    - dogstatsd.increment('webhook.circuit_breaker.triggered', { target })\n  Also: npm install hot-shots.\n\n● Claude is thinking...\n\n  ✓ Read src/workers/webhook-retry.ts\n  ✓ Read src/utils/logger.ts\n  ✓ Read src/config.ts\n  ✓ Search: 'hot-shots' in package.json → not found\n\n  Running: npm install hot-shots\n  ✓ hot-shots@10.0.0 installed\n\n  ✎ Writing src/utils/metrics.ts\n  ─────────────────────────────────────────\n  // zuno-app — Datadog StatsD metrics client\n  import StatsD from 'hot-shots'\n  import { config } from '../config'\n  import logger from './logger'\n\n  export const dogstatsd = new StatsD({\n    host:        process.env.STATSD_HOST ?? 'localhost',\n    port:        8125,\n    prefix:      'zuno.',\n    globalTags:  { env: config.NODE_ENV },\n    errorHandler: (err) => {\n      logger.error({ event: 'statsd_error', message: err.message })\n    },\n  })\n  ─────────────────────────────────────────\n  ✓ Wrote src/utils/metrics.ts  (17 lines)\n\n  ✎ Editing src/workers/webhook-retry.ts\n  ─────────────────────────────────────────\n  + import { dogstatsd } from '../utils/metrics'\n  ...\n  export async function processWebhookEvent(event: WebhookEvent): Promise<void> {\n    if (inMemoryWebhookStore.isTargetDead(event.targetUrl)) {\n      ...\n      return\n    }\n    if (event.attemptCount >= MAX_RETRIES) {\n      inMemoryWebhookStore.update(event.id, { status: WebhookStatus.Failed })\n      return\n    }\n  +   const startMs = Date.now()\n  +   const attemptNum = event.attemptCount + 1\n  +   dogstatsd.increment('webhook.delivery.attempt', 1, {\n  +     target:      new URL(event.targetUrl).hostname,\n  +     attempt_num: String(attemptNum),\n  +   })\n    try {\n      const deliveryId = crypto.randomUUID()\n      const res = await fetch(event.targetUrl, { ... })\n  +     const latencyMs = Date.now() - startMs\n      if (res.ok) {\n        inMemoryWebhookStore.resetTargetFailures(event.targetUrl)\n        inMemoryWebhookStore.update(event.id, { status: WebhookStatus.Success })\n  +       dogstatsd.timing('webhook.delivery.latency', latencyMs, {\n  +         target: new URL(event.targetUrl).hostname, status: 'success' })\n        return\n      }\n      if (statusCode >= 400 && statusCode < 500) {\n        inMemoryWebhookStore.update(event.id, { status: WebhookStatus.Failed })\n  +       dogstatsd.timing('webhook.delivery.latency', latencyMs, {\n  +         target: new URL(event.targetUrl).hostname, status: '4xx_permanent' })\n        return\n      }\n  +     dogstatsd.timing('webhook.delivery.latency', latencyMs, {\n  +       target: new URL(event.targetUrl).hostname, status: '5xx_retry' })\n    } catch (err) { ... }\n    const becameDead = inMemoryWebhookStore.recordTargetFailure(event.targetUrl)\n    if (becameDead) {\n      logger.error({ event: 'circuit_breaker_triggered', ... })\n  +     dogstatsd.increment('webhook.circuit_breaker.triggered', 1, {\n  +       target: new URL(event.targetUrl).hostname,\n  +     })\n    }\n    // Emit retry queue depth gauge\n  +   const pendingCount = inMemoryWebhookStore.countByStatus(WebhookStatus.Pending)\n  +   dogstatsd.gauge('webhook.retry_queue.depth', pendingCount)\n  }\n  ─────────────────────────────────────────\n  ✓ Wrote src/workers/webhook-retry.ts  (+18 lines)\n\n  Done. Metrics emitted:\n    zuno.webhook.delivery.attempt   (count, tags: target, attempt_num)\n    zuno.webhook.delivery.latency   (timing, tags: target, status)\n    zuno.webhook.retry_queue.depth  (gauge)\n    zuno.webhook.circuit_breaker.triggered  (count, tags: target)\n\n[14:50:15]\nVS Code — Terminal\n\n$ npm install hot-shots  (already done by Claude Code)\n$ npx tsc --noEmit\n  (exit 0)\n\n$ npm test -- --testPathPattern=webhook-retry\n  PASS tests/workers/webhook-retry.test.ts\n  Tests: 16 passed  |  Time: 3.0s\n\n$ git add src/utils/metrics.ts src/workers/webhook-retry.ts package.json package-lock.json\n$ git commit -m 'feat(webhook): add Datadog StatsD metrics integration (PROJ-201)\n>\n> PROJ-201 subtask 5 (final): observability via hot-shots StatsD client.\n>\n> New: src/utils/metrics.ts — dogstatsd singleton with zuno. prefix\n> Updated: webhook-retry.ts emits:\n>   zuno.webhook.delivery.attempt  (count, tags: target, attempt_num)\n>   zuno.webhook.delivery.latency  (timing ms, tags: target, status)\n>   zuno.webhook.retry_queue.depth  (gauge, pending event count)\n>   zuno.webhook.circuit_breaker.triggered  (count, tags: target)\n> All 16 tests still passing.'\n\n  [feat/webhook-retry 2b4f1c3]  feat(webhook): add Datadog StatsD metrics\n  4 files changed, 42 insertions(+)\n  create mode 100644 src/utils/metrics.ts\n\n$ gh pr ready 88  # mark PR #88 as ready to merge\n  PR #88 is marked as ready for review.\n\n(developer: PROJ-201 is complete. all 5 subtasks done:\n  ✓ schema (migration 0024)\n  ✓ TypeScript model\n  ✓ exponential backoff timer\n  ✓ integration test suite (16/16)\n  ✓ Datadog metrics\n Plus: circuit breaker, idempotency, jitter, retention policy.\n PR #88 ready for Sarah to approve and merge.)\n",
+      "audio_snippets": [],
+      "ground_truth": {
+        "task_key": "PROJ-201",
+        "session_type": "task",
+        "reasoning": "VS Code session implementing PROJ-201 subtask 5 (Datadog metrics). Creates src/utils/metrics.ts (dogstatsd singleton, hot-shots), updates webhook-retry.ts to emit 4 metrics (delivery attempt count, delivery latency timing, retry queue depth gauge, circuit_breaker triggered count). Installs hot-shots. Runs tsc (clean), all 16 tests pass. Commits, marks PR #88 as ready. PROJ-201 all 5 subtasks complete.",
+        "difficulty": "easy",
+        "scoreable": true
+      },
+      "design_notes": "EASY PROJ-201 case — wrapping up the last subtask. The commit message explicitly states 'PROJ-201 subtask 5 (final)'. The metric names reference webhook-specific concepts (delivery.attempt, circuit_breaker.triggered) that are unambiguous PROJ-201 work. PR #88 marked ready. The developer's closing note lists all 5 PROJ-201 subtasks as done. No PROJ-242 confusion here because the metrics are emitted from webhook-retry.ts, not a Slack integration."
+    },
+    {
+      "id": 18,
+      "app_name": "Slack",
+      "started_at": "2026-05-27T15:05:00+05:30",
+      "ended_at": null,
+      "duration_s": 23,
+      "category": "communication",
+      "confidence": 0.95,
+      "session_text_source": "ocr",
+      "window_titles": [
+        {
+          "window_name": "Slack — #frontend",
+          "count": 3
+        },
+        {
+          "window_name": "Slack — #backend",
+          "count": 1
+        }
+      ],
+      "session_text": "[15:05:00]\nSlack — Zuno Engineering\nChannel: #frontend  <- ACTIVE\n\n#frontend  recent messages:\n\nToday 14:58  Priya Kapoor (Design)\n  @Zoe -- saw you pushed feat/proj-225-dashboard-lazy-load!\n  Can you share the performance numbers once you run the profiler?\n  Specifically curious about: how long before the first chart appears\n  vs the current 3s blank screen. The product team wants to quote\n  an improvement number for the Q2 review.\n\nToday 14:59  Rachel Kim (PM)\n  Yes please! @Zoe if you have numbers by EOD that would be great.\n  The Q2 dashboard refresh design review is 2026-06-15 and we want\n  to show progress on the load time metric.\n\n[15:05:25]\nSlack — #frontend\n(developer types a reply)\n\nTyping:\n  @Priya @Rachel -- running the React DevTools Profiler now. Will have\n  numbers within the hour. Preliminary results from a quick manual test:\n  current FCP (First Contentful Paint) ~3.1s, lazy-load version ~140ms\n  (KPIs + status appear immediately). Will confirm with Profiler and\n  post numbers in this thread.\n\n(hits Enter -- message sent)\n\nToday 15:05  Zoe Dev  [sent]\n  @Priya @Rachel running the React DevTools Profiler now. Preliminary:\n  current FCP ~3.1s, lazy version ~140ms. Will post confirmed numbers within the hour.\n\nToday 15:05  :tada:  Priya Kapoor  (react)\n\nToday 15:06  Alex Rodriguez\n  Nice work on PROJ-225 Zoe! Also: @Sarah PROJ-210 PR #93 (frontend auth)\n  is up and ready for review. Depends on PR #92 (Zoe's backend). Can you\n  review both together? They're designed to land together.\n\nToday 15:06  Sarah Chen\n  On it! Will review PR #92 + #93 together after the sprint burndown\n  review at 16:00. Should have approval by EOD.\n\n[15:06:40]\nSlack — #backend\n(developer quickly checks #backend)\n\nToday 15:02  John Smith\n  PROJ-180-6 custom metrics are LIVE in Datadog! You can now use:\n    dogstatsd.increment('your.metric', value, { tags })\n  I've set up an empty 'Zuno Custom Metrics' dashboard in Datadog.\n  @Zoe -- your webhook retry metrics will appear there once PR #88 is merged.\n\n(developer: jsmith's Datadog metrics are live! PR #88 with the webhook\n metrics is already marked ready -- just needs Sarah's approval.)\n\n[15:07:10]\nSlack\n(developer closes Slack, opens VS Code to run the React DevTools Profiler)\n",
+      "audio_snippets": [],
+      "ground_truth": {
+        "task_key": "none",
+        "session_type": "overhead",
+        "reasoning": "Slack session responding to Priya and Rachel's request for PROJ-225 performance numbers. Developer posts a preliminary result (FCP 3.1s -> 140ms) and promises profiler numbers. Reads #backend to see jsmith's Datadog metrics update. No code written — pure team communication and coordination.",
+        "difficulty": "easy",
+        "scoreable": true
+      },
+      "design_notes": "EASY overhead case. Developer is reading and writing Slack messages about PROJ-225 performance numbers. Unlike session 2 (complex standup with technical detail), this session is simpler — a brief reply to a performance question and reading a #backend update. The mention of PROJ-225 FCP numbers might attract PROJ-225 task classification, but this is communication, not implementation."
+    },
+    {
+      "id": 19,
+      "app_name": "Code",
+      "started_at": "2026-05-27T15:08:00+05:30",
+      "ended_at": null,
+      "duration_s": 40,
+      "category": "coding",
+      "confidence": 0.97,
+      "session_text_source": "ocr",
+      "window_titles": [
+        {
+          "window_name": "src/styles/globals.css — zuno-app — Visual Studio Code",
+          "count": 2
+        },
+        {
+          "window_name": "src/components/Dashboard/index.tsx — zuno-app — Visual Studio Code",
+          "count": 2
+        },
+        {
+          "window_name": "Terminal — zsh — zuno-app",
+          "count": 5
+        }
+      ],
+      "session_text": "[15:08:00]\nVisual Studio Code\nBranch: feat/proj-225-dashboard-lazy-load\nActive tabs:\n  src/styles/globals.css  <- ACTIVE\n  src/components/Dashboard/index.tsx\n\n[15:08:12]\nVS Code — src/styles/globals.css\n(adding the chart-fade-in CSS class that Claude Code mentioned in session 10)\n\n  /* ... existing styles ... */\n  \n  /* PROJ-225: fade-in transition for lazy-loaded charts */\n  .chart-fade-in {\n    animation: chartFadeIn 300ms ease-in;\n  }\n  \n  @keyframes chartFadeIn {\n    from { opacity: 0; transform: translateY(4px); }\n    to   { opacity: 1; transform: translateY(0); }\n  }\n\n(developer types and saves: Cmd+S)\n\n[15:08:45]\nVS Code — Terminal\n\n$ npx tsc --noEmit\n  (exit 0)\n\n$ npm run dev  (starts Next.js dev server)\n  ready - started server on 0.0.0.0:3000, url: http://localhost:3000\n\n(developer opens Chrome DevTools for profiling)\n\n[15:09:10]\nVS Code — Terminal  (performance script)\n(developer uses Playwright to measure FCP before and after)\n\n> Write a quick Playwright script to measure First Contentful Paint (FCP)\n  on http://localhost:3000/dashboard. Run it 3 times and average the FCP.\n  Print: average FCP, min FCP, max FCP.\n\n● Claude is thinking...\n\n  ✎ Writing /tmp/measure-fcp.ts  (temporary script)\n  ─────────────────────────────────────────\n  import { chromium } from 'playwright'\n\n  async function measureFcp(url: string): Promise<number> {\n    const browser = await chromium.launch()\n    const page = await browser.newPage()\n    const fcpPromise = page.evaluate(() =>\n      new Promise<number>((resolve) => {\n        new PerformanceObserver((list) => {\n          const fcp = list.getEntriesByName('first-contentful-paint')[0]\n          if (fcp) resolve(fcp.startTime)\n        }).observe({ entryTypes: ['paint'] })\n      })\n    )\n    await page.goto(url)\n    const fcp = await fcpPromise\n    await browser.close()\n    return fcp\n  }\n\n  const results = []\n  for (let i = 0; i < 3; i++) {\n    const fcp = await measureFcp('http://localhost:3000/dashboard')\n    results.push(fcp)\n    console.log(`Run ${i+1}: ${fcp.toFixed(0)}ms`)\n  }\n  const avg = results.reduce((a,b) => a+b, 0) / results.length\n  console.log(`Average FCP: ${avg.toFixed(0)}ms`)\n  console.log(`Min: ${Math.min(...results).toFixed(0)}ms`)\n  console.log(`Max: ${Math.max(...results).toFixed(0)}ms`)\n  ─────────────────────────────────────────\n  ✓ Written /tmp/measure-fcp.ts\n\n[15:09:55]\nVS Code — Terminal  (running the FCP measurement)\n\n$ npx ts-node /tmp/measure-fcp.ts\n  Run 1: 134ms\n  Run 2: 142ms\n  Run 3: 128ms\n  Average FCP: 135ms\n  Min: 128ms\n  Max: 142ms\n\n(developer: FCP is 135ms average! Original was ~3,100ms. That's a 23x improvement.)\n\n$ npx ts-node /tmp/measure-fcp.ts  # run again on the OLD branch to baseline\n  (switches to main branch)\n\n$ git stash && git checkout main\n  Run 1: 3,102ms\n  Run 2: 3,087ms\n  Run 3: 3,143ms\n  Average FCP: 3,111ms\n\n$ git checkout feat/proj-225-dashboard-lazy-load && git stash pop\n\n(developer: confirmed: 3,111ms -> 135ms. 23x improvement. well within <1s target.)\n\n[15:10:45]\nVS Code — Terminal  (commit and push)\n\n$ git add src/styles/globals.css\n$ git commit -m 'feat(dashboard): add chart-fade-in CSS animation (PROJ-225)\n>\n> 300ms ease-in opacity + 4px translateY fade for lazy-loaded charts.\n> FCP measurement: 3,111ms (baseline) -> 135ms (lazy-load) = 23x improvement.\n> Well within the <1s target from PROJ-225 acceptance criteria.'\n\n  [feat/proj-225-dashboard-lazy-load b9c0d1e]\n  feat(dashboard): add chart-fade-in CSS animation\n  1 file changed, 9 insertions(+)\n\n$ git push -u origin feat/proj-225-dashboard-lazy-load\n$ gh pr create --draft --title 'feat(dashboard): lazy-load heavy charts (PROJ-225)'\\\n    --body 'PROJ-225: React.lazy() + Suspense + skeleton for 3 heavy charts.\n    FCP: 3,111ms -> 135ms (23x improvement). Full load: <4s SLA met.\n    chart-fade-in 300ms CSS. ErrorBoundary for error/retry state.\n    4 Dashboard tests passing.'\n  Draft PR #94 created.\n\n(developer: PROJ-225 core done. Will post performance numbers to Slack.)\n",
+      "audio_snippets": [],
+      "ground_truth": {
+        "task_key": "PROJ-225",
+        "session_type": "task",
+        "reasoning": "VS Code session wrapping up PROJ-225. Developer adds chart-fade-in CSS (300ms ease-in, translateY), uses Claude Code to write a Playwright FCP measurement script, runs it on both branches (baseline 3,111ms vs lazy 135ms = 23x improvement), commits CSS, pushes branch, opens draft PR #94. PROJ-225 core implementation complete.",
+        "difficulty": "easy",
+        "scoreable": true
+      },
+      "design_notes": "EASY PROJ-225. The FCP measurement (3,111ms -> 135ms) directly addresses the PROJ-225 performance targets. Branch is feat/proj-225-dashboard-lazy-load. The Playwright script is a one-off measurement tool, not PROJ-215 (pagination bug) or PROJ-230 (CSV export). Commit and PR reference PROJ-225 explicitly."
+    },
+    {
+      "id": 20,
+      "app_name": "Slack",
+      "started_at": "2026-05-27T15:12:00+05:30",
+      "ended_at": null,
+      "duration_s": 25,
+      "category": "communication",
+      "confidence": 0.94,
+      "session_text_source": "ocr",
+      "window_titles": [
+        {
+          "window_name": "Slack — #frontend",
+          "count": 3
+        },
+        {
+          "window_name": "Slack — #general",
+          "count": 1
+        }
+      ],
+      "session_text": "[15:12:00]\nSlack — Zuno Engineering\nChannel: #frontend  <- ACTIVE\n\n[15:12:10]\nSlack — #frontend\n(developer types performance results message)\n\nTyping:\n  @Priya @Rachel -- confirmed PROJ-225 performance numbers! :bar_chart:\n\n  Dashboard FCP (First Contentful Paint) measurement:\n    Before (static imports):  3,111ms  (3.1 seconds blank screen)\n    After  (React.lazy):        135ms  (23x improvement)\n\n  How it works:\n    - KPIs, status bars, activity feed load immediately (~140ms)\n    - Revenue chart, forecast chart, analytics grid lazy-load:\n        Revenue:   ~850ms (skeleton shows until loaded)\n        Forecast:  ~780ms\n        Analytics: ~650ms\n    - Full dashboard complete: ~2.5s (well within <4s SLA)\n    - Skeleton uses neutral-300 + pulse animation (from Priya's Figma)\n    - Chart reveals with 300ms fade-in (no jarring pop)\n\n  PR #94 is up: feat/proj-225-dashboard-lazy-load\n  Ready for design review from @Priya and product review from @Rachel!\n\n(hits Enter)\n\nToday 15:12  Zoe Dev  [sent]\n  @Priya @Rachel confirmed PROJ-225 performance numbers!\n  FCP: 3,111ms -> 135ms  (23x improvement).\n  Full dashboard: ~2.5s. PR #94 ready for review.\n\nToday 15:13  :tada:  Priya Kapoor, Rachel Kim, Alex Rodriguez  (react)\n\nToday 15:13  Rachel Kim\n  23x improvement is incredible! I'm quoting this in the Q2 review.\n  Thanks Zoe! :star:\n\nToday 15:14  Priya Kapoor\n  Amazing! Will review PR #94 now. One question: is the skeleton animation\n  smooth on lower-powered devices? We should test on a slower machine.\n\nToday 15:14  Zoe Dev  [reply]\n  Good point @Priya! The CSS animation uses `will-change: opacity` which\n  runs on the compositor (GPU-accelerated). Should be smooth even on slower\n  devices. I'll add a Lighthouse mobile score to the PR description.\n\n[15:15:20]\nSlack — #general\n(developer clicks #general)\n\nToday 15:00  Sarah Chen\n  Sprint check-in: great velocity this week! PROJ-210 backend + frontend\n  both up for review. PROJ-201 all 5 subtasks done. PROJ-225 showing\n  incredible results. Team is crushing it. :rocket:\n\n  Still in flight:\n    - PROJ-210 PR #92 + #93 pending Sarah review (EOD today)\n    - PROJ-225 PR #94 pending design + product review\n    - PROJ-201 PR #88 pending Sarah review\n    - PROJ-230 CSV export: next up for Zoe (after #94 merges)\n    - PROJ-215 pagination bug: still unassigned\n\n(developer reads Sarah's sprint check-in -- everything is on track)\n\n[15:16:00]\nSlack\n(developer closes Slack -- done with comms for now)\n(opens VS Code for remaining work)\n",
+      "audio_snippets": [],
+      "ground_truth": {
+        "task_key": "none",
+        "session_type": "overhead",
+        "reasoning": "Slack session posting PROJ-225 performance results to #frontend (FCP 3,111ms -> 135ms, 23x improvement, full dashboard 2.5s), replying to Priya about GPU-accelerated animation, reading Sarah's sprint check-in in #general. No code written — team communication and result-sharing.",
+        "difficulty": "medium",
+        "scoreable": true
+      },
+      "design_notes": "MEDIUM overhead — developer is sharing technical results (FCP numbers, skeleton animation details, 23x improvement) about PROJ-225 in Slack. A classifier that sees 'React.lazy', 'skeleton', 'FCP', 'chart lazy-load' might map this to PROJ-225 task work. Discriminator: Slack window, message format (sharing results to team), no file edits. The #general sprint check-in also names PROJ-201, PROJ-210, PROJ-225, PROJ-230 and PROJ-215 — maximum ticket vocabulary present, all in a team update context. Overhead is the correct label."
+    },
+    {
+      "id": 21,
+      "app_name": "Google Chrome",
+      "started_at": "2026-05-27T15:17:00+05:30",
+      "ended_at": null,
+      "duration_s": 41,
+      "category": "research",
+      "confidence": 0.72,
+      "session_text_source": "ocr",
+      "window_titles": [
+        {
+          "window_name": "Stack Overflow — React Suspense — Google Chrome",
+          "count": 2
+        },
+        {
+          "window_name": "Stack Overflow — TypeScript const enum — Google Chrome",
+          "count": 2
+        },
+        {
+          "window_name": "Stack Overflow — timingSafeEqual — Google Chrome",
+          "count": 2
+        }
+      ],
+      "session_text": "[15:17:00]\nGoogle Chrome\nTabs:\n  (1) Stack Overflow — React Suspense error boundary  <- ACTIVE\n  (2) Stack Overflow — TypeScript const enum tree shaking\n  (3) Stack Overflow — Node.js crypto timing safe equal length mismatch\n\nURL: https://stackoverflow.com/questions/47038209/react-suspense-error-boundary-render\n\n[15:17:10]\nStack Overflow — React Suspense error boundary\n\nQuestion:\n  How does ErrorBoundary work with React Suspense lazy loading?\n  If a lazy-loaded component throws during loading, does ErrorBoundary catch it?\n  Asked: 2022-11-15  |  Views: 18,432  |  Votes: 67\n\nTop Answer (accepted, 189 votes):  Mia Hoffmann\n  Yes — ErrorBoundary catches errors thrown during React.lazy() loading.\n  This includes network errors (failed to fetch the chunk) and errors\n  thrown by the component itself on first render.\n\n  Correct pattern:\n    <ErrorBoundary fallback={<div>Error loading chart</div>}>\n      <Suspense fallback={<Skeleton />}>\n        <LazyChart />\n      </Suspense>\n    </ErrorBoundary>\n\n  ErrorBoundary must be OUTSIDE Suspense -- if it's inside, Suspense won't\n  suspend correctly because ErrorBoundary catches the Promise that Suspense\n  needs to intercept.\n\n  Important: ErrorBoundary must be a class component (React limitation as of 18.x).\n  Hooks can't catch errors during render. The existing react-error-boundary\n  package wraps this for you if you want a functional component interface.\n\n  Second answer (72 votes):  Luca Ferreira\n  In React 19 there's a new 'use' API that simplifies this. But if you're\n  on React 18, ErrorBoundary+Suspense is the standard pattern.\n\n(developer: confirms the ErrorBoundary-outside-Suspense pattern I already implemented\n in session 10. good -- nothing to change.)\n(quickly checks that the existing ErrorBoundary in the codebase is a class component)\n\n[15:17:55]\nStack Overflow — TypeScript const enum tree shaking\n(developer switches to tab 2)\n\nURL: https://stackoverflow.com/questions/28818849/how-does-typescript-const-enum-work\n\nQuestion:\n  What is the difference between 'enum' and 'const enum' in TypeScript?\n  Does const enum actually improve tree-shaking?\n\nTop Answer (312 votes):\n  Regular enum: compiled to a JavaScript object at runtime.\n    enum Direction { Up = 'UP', Down = 'DOWN' }\n    // compiles to: var Direction; (function(Direction) {...})(Direction = {})\n    // the Direction object exists at runtime, consumes bundle size\n\n  const enum: inlined at compile time, no runtime object.\n    const enum Direction { Up = 'UP', Down = 'DOWN' }\n    // all uses of Direction.Up are replaced with 'UP' at compile time\n    // no runtime object -- zero bundle cost\n\n  For tree-shaking: const enum is better because bundlers (webpack/esbuild)\n  see literal string values, not property accesses on an object.\n  Caveat: const enum doesn't work across module boundaries with isolatedModules.\n\n(developer: confirms the PR #88 const enum fix was correct. Alex was right.)\n\n[15:18:35]\nStack Overflow — timingSafeEqual length mismatch\n(developer switches to tab 3)\n\nURL: https://stackoverflow.com/questions/51581920/node-crypto-timingsafeequal-throws\n\nQuestion:\n  Why does crypto.timingSafeEqual throw when comparing strings of different length?\n  I expected it to return false.\n\nTop Answer (89 votes):\n  timingSafeEqual requires both buffers to have the SAME LENGTH. If they differ,\n  it throws a TypeError. This is by design:\n    - Constant-time comparison only makes sense for same-length inputs\n    - If it returned false for different lengths, the length itself would be\n      a timing oracle (attackers could probe until they find the right length)\n    - So it throws to force callers to handle the case explicitly\n\n  Correct pattern:\n    try {\n      return crypto.timingSafeEqual(\n        Buffer.from(secret1),\n        Buffer.from(secret2)\n      )\n    } catch {\n      return false  // different lengths\n    }\n\n(developer: yes, that's exactly what I implemented in session-store.ts validateCsrf().\n the try/catch pattern is correct. just confirming.)\n(closes all Stack Overflow tabs, closes Chrome)\n",
+      "audio_snippets": [],
+      "ground_truth": {
+        "task_key": "none",
+        "session_type": "untracked",
+        "reasoning": "Chrome session reading three Stack Overflow answers for curiosity/confirmation after implementing features (not to unblock a task). Developer confirms the ErrorBoundary pattern they already implemented is correct, confirms const enum fix was right, confirms timingSafeEqual try/catch is correct. Nothing new to implement — pure confirmation reading. The developer already shipped all three features before reading these answers.",
+        "difficulty": "hard-decoy",
+        "scoreable": true
+      },
+      "design_notes": "HARD-DECOY — developer reads Stack Overflow about React Suspense/ErrorBoundary (PROJ-225 related), TypeScript const enum (PROJ-201 related), and timingSafeEqual (PROJ-210 related). All three topics map directly to implemented features. A classifier might split between PROJ-225/210/201 or pick any one of them. The correct label is untracked because: (1) developer already implemented all three features in earlier sessions, (2) they're reading to confirm, not to implement, (3) 'closes all Stack Overflow tabs' indicates curiosity closure, (4) session confidence is 0.72 (real uncertainty in the label). Cross-ticket confirmation reading ≠ task work."
+    },
+    {
+      "id": 22,
+      "app_name": "Google Chrome",
+      "started_at": "2026-05-27T15:20:00+05:30",
+      "ended_at": null,
+      "duration_s": 44,
+      "category": "communication",
+      "confidence": 0.88,
+      "session_text_source": "ocr",
+      "window_titles": [
+        {
+          "window_name": "GitHub — PR #92 — Google Chrome",
+          "count": 5
+        },
+        {
+          "window_name": "GitHub — PR #93 — Google Chrome",
+          "count": 2
+        }
+      ],
+      "session_text": "[15:20:00]\nGoogle Chrome\nTabs:\n  (1) GitHub — PR #92 — feat/proj-210-auth-migration  <- ACTIVE\n  (2) GitHub — PR #93 — feat/proj-210-auth-frontend\n\nURL: https://github.com/zuno-app/zuno/pull/92\n\n[15:20:10]\nGitHub — PR #92 — feat(auth): JWT -> session cookie migration (PROJ-210)\n\nPR Status:\n  Author: Zoe Dev (me)  |  Reviewers: Sarah Chen (requested)\n  Status: Open (Draft -> Ready)  |  CI: All checks passed\n  Commits: 4  |  Files changed: 8  |  +274 -18 lines\n  Labels: PROJ-210, auth, breaking-change\n\nConversation:\n  [15:15] Sarah Chen  (review approved)\n    LGTM! Great implementation. A few inline comments:\n\n  Sarah Chen  [inline comment on src/services/session-store.ts, line 57]\n    pruneExpired() is called on a timer -- but should it also be called\n    on every get()? Avoids stale sessions appearing briefly if the timer\n    hasn't fired yet. Small thing -- not blocking.\n\n  Sarah Chen  [inline comment on src/routes/auth.ts, line 30]\n    The SESSION_TTL_SECS is hardcoded to 30 days. Should this be a config\n    env var? Some enterprise customers might want shorter sessions.\n    Suggestion: add SESSION_TTL_DAYS to config.ts. Not blocking.\n\n  Sarah Chen  [inline comment on src/routes/auth.ts, line 144]\n    TODO(PROJ-210): verify idToken signature against Okta JWKS endpoint.\n    This should be a follow-up ticket, not deferred indefinitely.\n    Creating PROJ-251 to track the JWKS verification.\n\n  [15:16]  Zoe Dev (me)  [reply]\n    All great points! Addressing:\n    1. pruneExpired() on get(): good idea, adding it now\n    2. SESSION_TTL_DAYS config: agreed, adding to config.ts\n    3. JWKS: noted, PROJ-251 created -- that's the right call\n\n[15:20:45]\nGitHub — PR #92  (Files Changed tab)\n(developer reads through the diff to double-check Sarah's inline comments)\n\nFiles changed:\n  src/app.ts                  +9   (pruneExpired scheduler)\n  src/config.ts               +5   (OKTA_* fields)\n  src/middleware/auth.ts      +42  (cookie+CSRF path)\n  src/routes/auth.ts          +57  (login, csrf-token, logout, okta)\n  src/services/session-store.ts  +69  (InMemorySessionStore + PkceStore)\n  package.json                +2   (cookie-parser)\n  package-lock.json           +115\n\nDiff — src/services/session-store.ts  (Sarah's pruneExpired comment)\n  30   get(sessionId: string): Session | null {\n  31     const session = this.sessions.get(sessionId)\n  32     if (!session) return null\n  33     if (session.expiresAt < new Date()) {\n  34       this.sessions.delete(sessionId)\n  35       return null\n  36     }\n  37     return session\n  38   }\n  (developer: actually, the get() already handles expired sessions by\n   deleting them on access at lines 33-35. Sarah's point was about\n   sessions that aren't accessed -- the timer covers those. The current\n   implementation is correct. Will reply to clarify.)\n\n[15:21:30]\nGitHub — PR #92  (adding reply to Sarah's comment)\n\n  [Reply to Sarah's session-store.ts comment]\n    Good catch on the pruneExpired timing! Actually the get() method\n    already lazily expires sessions on access (lines 33-35 -- checks\n    expiresAt and deletes if expired). The timer catches sessions that\n    are never accessed. So both paths are covered. No change needed here!\n\n  [Reply to Sarah's SESSION_TTL_DAYS comment]\n    Agreed -- adding SESSION_TTL_DAYS to config.ts in a follow-up commit\n    before we merge. Good find.\n\n[15:22:00]\nGitHub — PR #93 (switches to tab 2)\n\nGitHub — PR #93 — feat(auth): frontend CSRF token integration (PROJ-210)\n\nPR Status:\n  Author: Alex Rodriguez  |  Reviewers: Sarah Chen (requested)\n  Status: Open  |  CI: All checks passed\n  Commits: 3  |  Files changed: 4  |  +148 -62 lines\n\nSarah's review:\n  LGTM! The setCsrfGetter pattern is clean -- avoids the circular import\n  issue. Approved.\n\n  [inline comment on src/api/client.ts, line 12]\n    The silent catch on CSRF token missing: 'This should only happen during\n    app startup before useEffect runs.' -- can we add a console.warn in dev\n    mode so we catch it early in testing?\n\nAlex Rodriguez  [reply]\n  Good point! Adding: if (process.env.NODE_ENV === 'development') console.warn('[CSRF] ...')\n\n(developer: PR #93 is approved with one small fix from Alex. Both PRs approved.\n Will merge both once Alex adds the dev-mode warning.)\n\n[15:22:40]\nGoogle Chrome\n(developer closes GitHub tabs, returns to VS Code for the SESSION_TTL_DAYS fix)\n",
+      "audio_snippets": [],
+      "ground_truth": {
+        "task_key": "PROJ-210",
+        "session_type": "overhead",
+        "reasoning": "Chrome session reviewing PR #92 (PROJ-210 backend) and PR #93 (PROJ-210 frontend). Developer reads Sarah's review comments (pruneExpired, SESSION_TTL_DAYS, JWKS TODO), replies to clarify the lazy-expiry behaviour in get(), reads Alex's frontend PR approved by Sarah with one dev-mode warning fix. Both PRs approved. This is PR review overhead — reading and replying to code review comments, not writing new implementation.",
+        "difficulty": "medium",
+        "scoreable": true
+      },
+      "design_notes": "MEDIUM overhead case. Developer is reading their own PRs (#92 backend, #93 frontend) and writing review replies. The GitHub diff shows auth.ts code (PROJ-210 implementation). A classifier might map this to PROJ-210 task because it sees the auth implementation in the diff. Discriminator: developer is replying to review comments, not editing files in VS Code. Window title is GitHub, not VS Code. Session ends with developer returning to VS Code for a small SESSION_TTL_DAYS fix (overhead -> task handoff). The 'both PRs approved' context suggests this is review coordination rather than implementation."
+    },
+    {
+      "id": 23,
+      "app_name": "Code",
+      "started_at": "2026-05-27T15:23:00+05:30",
+      "ended_at": null,
+      "duration_s": 22,
+      "category": "coding",
+      "confidence": 0.97,
+      "session_text_source": "ocr",
+      "window_titles": [
+        {
+          "window_name": "src/config.ts — zuno-app — Visual Studio Code",
+          "count": 2
+        },
+        {
+          "window_name": "src/routes/auth.ts — zuno-app — Visual Studio Code",
+          "count": 2
+        },
+        {
+          "window_name": "Terminal — zsh — zuno-app",
+          "count": 3
+        }
+      ],
+      "session_text": "[15:23:00]\nVisual Studio Code\nBranch: feat/proj-210-auth-migration\nActive tab: src/config.ts\n\n[15:23:10]\nVS Code — src/config.ts  (adding SESSION_TTL_DAYS)\n\n  export const config = {\n    PORT:                process.env.PORT ?? '3000',\n    NODE_ENV:            process.env.NODE_ENV ?? 'development',\n    JWT_SECRET:          process.env.JWT_SECRET ?? 'dev-secret-change-in-prod',\n    AUTH_COOKIE_ENABLED: process.env.AUTH_COOKIE_ENABLED === 'true',\n    COOKIE_DOMAIN:       process.env.COOKIE_DOMAIN ?? 'localhost',\n    DB_PATH:             process.env.DB_PATH ?? './zuno.db',\n    OKTA_DOMAIN:         process.env.OKTA_DOMAIN ?? '',\n    OKTA_CLIENT_ID:      process.env.OKTA_CLIENT_ID ?? '',\n    OKTA_CLIENT_SECRET:  process.env.OKTA_CLIENT_SECRET ?? '',\n    OKTA_REDIRECT_URI:   process.env.OKTA_REDIRECT_URI ?? '',\n    OKTA_SCOPES:         (process.env.OKTA_SCOPES ?? 'openid profile email').split(' '),\n  +  SESSION_TTL_DAYS:   parseInt(process.env.SESSION_TTL_DAYS ?? '30', 10),\n  }\n\n(developer adds the line, Cmd+S)\n\n[15:23:25]\nVS Code — src/routes/auth.ts  (updating SESSION_TTL_SECS to use config)\n\n  - const SESSION_TTL_SECS = 30 * 24 * 60 * 60  // hardcoded 30 days\n  + const SESSION_TTL_SECS = config.SESSION_TTL_DAYS * 24 * 60 * 60\n\n(Cmd+S)\n\n[15:23:40]\nVS Code — Terminal\n\n$ npx tsc --noEmit\n  (exit 0)\n\n$ npm test -- --testPathPattern=routes/auth\n  PASS tests/routes/auth.test.ts\n  Tests: 18 passed  |  Time: 2.2s\n\n$ git add src/config.ts src/routes/auth.ts\n$ git commit -m 'fix(auth): make session TTL configurable via SESSION_TTL_DAYS env var\n>\n> PROJ-210 review follow-up (Sarah Chen): hardcoded 30 days -> config.SESSION_TTL_DAYS\n> enterprise customers may need shorter session TTLs via env override.'\n\n  [feat/proj-210-auth-migration a1b2c3d]\n  fix(auth): make session TTL configurable via SESSION_TTL_DAYS env var\n  2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)\n\n$ git push\n  Pushed to feat/proj-210-auth-migration\n\n$ gh pr merge 92 --squash --delete-branch\n  Squashing and merging PR #92...\n  PR #92 merged into main!\n  Branch feat/proj-210-auth-migration deleted.\n\n(developer: PR #92 merged! auth backend is in main.)\n(waiting for Alex to push the dev-mode warning fix on PR #93)\n",
+      "audio_snippets": [],
+      "ground_truth": {
+        "task_key": "PROJ-210",
+        "session_type": "task",
+        "reasoning": "VS Code session applying Sarah's review feedback from PR #92: adds SESSION_TTL_DAYS to config.ts, updates SESSION_TTL_SECS in routes/auth.ts to use config. Runs tsc (clean), runs auth tests (18/18 pass), commits, pushes, merges PR #92 via squash. PROJ-210 backend is now in main.",
+        "difficulty": "easy",
+        "scoreable": true
+      },
+      "design_notes": "EASY PROJ-210 — small review follow-up commit (2 files, 3 insertions). Commit message explicitly cites 'PROJ-210 review follow-up'. PR #92 merge confirms the ticket is complete on the backend side."
+    },
+    {
+      "id": 24,
+      "app_name": "Code",
+      "started_at": "2026-05-27T15:28:00+05:30",
+      "ended_at": null,
+      "duration_s": 54,
+      "category": "coding",
+      "confidence": 0.97,
+      "session_text_source": "ocr",
+      "window_titles": [
+        {
+          "window_name": "src/components/Reports/Toolbar.tsx — zuno-app — Visual Studio Code",
+          "count": 4
+        },
+        {
+          "window_name": "src/utils/export.ts — zuno-app — Visual Studio Code",
+          "count": 2
+        },
+        {
+          "window_name": "Terminal — zsh — zuno-app",
+          "count": 4
+        }
+      ],
+      "session_text": "[15:28:00]\nVisual Studio Code\nBranch: feat/proj-230-csv-export  (new branch)\nActive tabs:\n  src/components/Reports/Toolbar.tsx  <- ACTIVE\n  src/utils/export.ts  (new file)\n\n$ git checkout -b feat/proj-230-csv-export\n  Switched to new branch 'feat/proj-230-csv-export'\n\n[15:28:15]\nVS Code — src/components/Reports/Toolbar.tsx  (existing)\n\n  1   // zuno-app — reports toolbar\n  2   import React from 'react'\n  3   import { Button } from '../ui/Button'\n  4   import { useReports } from '../../hooks/useReports'\n  5   \n  6   export function ReportsToolbar() {\n  7     const { exportPdf } = useReports()\n  8     return (\n  9       <div className='toolbar'>\n 10         <span className='toolbar-title'>Reports</span>\n 11         <div className='toolbar-actions'>\n 12           <Button onClick={exportPdf} variant='secondary'>\n 13             Export PDF\n 14           </Button>\n 15         </div>\n 16       </div>\n 17     )\n 18   }\n\n(developer: need to add an 'Export CSV' button next to the PDF button)\n\n[15:28:35]\nVS Code — Terminal  (Claude Code)\n\n> PROJ-230: add CSV export to the reports module.\n  1. Create src/utils/export.ts:\n     - exportToCsv(data: Record<string, unknown>[], filename: string): void\n     - Use papaparse (already installed) to serialize\n     - Trigger browser download via URL.createObjectURL(blob) + anchor click\n     - Format numbers: remove trailing .00 from integers\n     - filename: zuno-report-YYYY-MM-DD.csv (use current date)\n  2. Update src/components/Reports/Toolbar.tsx:\n     - Add 'Export CSV' button next to the PDF button\n     - Call exportToCsv with the current report data (from useReports)\n  Check if papaparse is installed first.\n\n● Claude is thinking...\n\n  ✓ Read src/components/Reports/Toolbar.tsx\n  ✓ Read src/hooks/useReports.ts  →  exports: { data, exportPdf, filters }\n  ✓ Read package.json  →  papaparse: '^5.4.1' (installed!)\n  ✓ Read @types/papaparse  →  found in devDependencies\n\n  ✎ Writing src/utils/export.ts\n  ─────────────────────────────────────────\n  // zuno-app — data export utilities\n  import Papa from 'papaparse'\n\n  function formatValue(value: unknown): string {\n    if (typeof value === 'number') {\n      // Remove trailing .00 for whole numbers\n      return Number.isInteger(value) ? String(value) : value.toFixed(2)\n    }\n    if (value instanceof Date) return value.toISOString().slice(0, 10)\n    if (value === null || value === undefined) return ''\n    return String(value)\n  }\n\n  export function exportToCsv(\n    data:     Record<string, unknown>[],\n    filename: string = generateFilename(),\n  ): void {\n    if (data.length === 0) return\n    const formatted = data.map((row) =>\n      Object.fromEntries(\n        Object.entries(row).map(([k, v]) => [k, formatValue(v)])\n      )\n    )\n    const csv = Papa.unparse(formatted)\n    const blob = new Blob([csv], { type: 'text/csv;charset=utf-8;' })\n    const url  = URL.createObjectURL(blob)\n    const link = document.createElement('a')\n    link.href     = url\n    link.download = filename\n    link.click()\n    URL.revokeObjectURL(url)  // cleanup\n  }\n\n  function generateFilename(): string {\n    const date = new Date().toISOString().slice(0, 10)  // YYYY-MM-DD\n    return `zuno-report-${date}.csv`\n  }\n  ─────────────────────────────────────────\n  ✓ Wrote src/utils/export.ts  (36 lines)\n\n  ✎ Editing src/components/Reports/Toolbar.tsx\n  ─────────────────────────────────────────\n  + import { exportToCsv } from '../../utils/export'\n  ...\n  export function ReportsToolbar() {\n  - const { exportPdf } = useReports()\n  + const { data, exportPdf } = useReports()\n    return (\n      <div className='toolbar'>\n        <span className='toolbar-title'>Reports</span>\n        <div className='toolbar-actions'>\n  +       <Button\n  +         onClick={() => exportToCsv(data)}\n  +         variant='secondary'\n  +       >\n  +         Export CSV\n  +       </Button>\n          <Button onClick={exportPdf} variant='secondary'>\n            Export PDF\n          </Button>\n        </div>\n      </div>\n    )\n  }\n  ─────────────────────────────────────────\n  ✓ Wrote src/components/Reports/Toolbar.tsx  (+8 lines)\n\n  Done. papaparse was already installed -- no new dependencies needed.\n\n[15:30:15]\nVS Code — Terminal\n\n$ npx tsc --noEmit\n  (exit 0)\n\n$ npm test -- --testPathPattern=export --verbose\n  PASS src/utils/export.test.ts\n    exportToCsv\n      ✓ generates correct CSV from array of objects  (12ms)\n      ✓ removes trailing .00 from integer values  (4ms)\n      ✓ formats Date objects as YYYY-MM-DD  (3ms)\n      ✓ handles empty data array (no-op)  (2ms)\n      ✓ generates filename with today date  (5ms)\n  Tests: 5 passed  |  Time: 1.1s\n\n$ git add src/utils/export.ts src/components/Reports/Toolbar.tsx\n$ git commit -m 'feat(reports): add CSV export button and exportToCsv utility (PROJ-230)\n>\n> - src/utils/export.ts: exportToCsv() using papaparse + Blob URL download\n>   - formatValue(): strips trailing .00 from integers, ISO date format\n>   - generateFilename(): zuno-report-YYYY-MM-DD.csv\n> - Toolbar.tsx: Export CSV button next to Export PDF\n> - 5/5 export tests passing. No new dependencies (papaparse already installed).'\n\n  [feat/proj-230-csv-export 7e8f9a0]  feat(reports): add CSV export\n  2 files changed, 44 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)\n  create mode 100644 src/utils/export.ts\n\n(developer: PROJ-230 core implementation done.\n TODO: test with large dataset (10k+ rows), add streaming if needed.)\n",
+      "audio_snippets": [],
+      "ground_truth": {
+        "task_key": "PROJ-230",
+        "session_type": "task",
+        "reasoning": "VS Code session implementing PROJ-230 CSV export. Creates feat/proj-230-csv-export branch, opens Toolbar.tsx (existing PDF-only toolbar), prompts Claude Code to add exportToCsv utility (papaparse, Blob URL, formatValue for number/date formatting) and 'Export CSV' button next to PDF. Runs tsc (clean), runs 5 export tests (pass). Commits. Files: src/utils/export.ts (new), Toolbar.tsx (+8 lines).",
+        "difficulty": "easy",
+        "scoreable": true
+      },
+      "design_notes": "EASY PROJ-230 — distinct from PROJ-225 despite both being frontend/dashboard. Discriminators: (1) branch is feat/proj-230-csv-export, (2) files edited are Toolbar.tsx and export.ts (not Dashboard/index.tsx or Skeleton), (3) code uses papaparse (CSV library), not React.lazy/Suspense, (4) commit message names PROJ-230. The PROJ-225 vs PROJ-230 hard discrimination will be tested in session 25 where both tickets appear in the same context."
+    },
+    {
+      "id": 25,
+      "app_name": "Google Chrome",
+      "started_at": "2026-05-27T15:32:00+05:30",
+      "ended_at": null,
+      "duration_s": 34,
+      "category": "communication",
+      "confidence": 0.82,
+      "session_text_source": "ocr",
+      "window_titles": [
+        {
+          "window_name": "Linear — PROJ-225 — Google Chrome",
+          "count": 2
+        },
+        {
+          "window_name": "Linear — PROJ-230 — Google Chrome",
+          "count": 2
+        },
+        {
+          "window_name": "GitHub — PR #94 — Google Chrome",
+          "count": 2
+        },
+        {
+          "window_name": "GitHub — PR #95 — Google Chrome",
+          "count": 2
+        }
+      ],
+      "session_text": "[15:32:00]\nGoogle Chrome\nTabs:\n  (1) Linear — PROJ-225  <- ACTIVE\n  (2) Linear — PROJ-230\n  (3) GitHub — PR #94  (feat/proj-225-dashboard-lazy-load)\n  (4) GitHub — PR #95 (feat/proj-230-csv-export — just opened)\n\n[15:32:10]\nLinear — PROJ-225 Detail\n\nPROJ-225 — Dashboard performance: lazy-load heavy chart components\nStatus: In Review\nAssignee: @me  |  Due: 2026-06-02  |  5 pts\n\n(developer updates PROJ-225 status to 'In Review' now that PR #94 is up)\n(developer adds a comment to PROJ-225:)\n\nComment added:\n  Implementation done! PR #94 is up for review.\n  FCP: 3,111ms -> 135ms (23x improvement, well within <1s target).\n  Full dashboard: ~2.5s (within <4s SLA).\n  Skeleton: neutral-300 pulse (Priya's Figma spec). ErrorBoundary for failures.\n  Pending: Priya's design review + Rachel's product review.\n\n[15:32:55]\nLinear — PROJ-230 Detail\n(developer switches to PROJ-230 tab)\n\nPROJ-230 — Add CSV export to the reports module\nStatus: In Review  (developer just updated)\nAssignee: @me  |  Due: 2026-06-05  |  3 pts\n\n(developer updates PROJ-230 status to 'In Review')\n(developer adds a comment to PROJ-230:)\n\nComment added:\n  Implementation done faster than expected! PR #95 is up.\n  exportToCsv() uses papaparse + Blob URL download.\n  'Export CSV' button added to ReportsToolbar next to PDF button.\n  formatValue handles integer stripping (.00) and Date -> ISO format.\n  TODO: load test with 10k+ rows (Acme Corp use case) before merging.\n\n[15:33:30]\nGitHub — PR #94  (feat/proj-225-dashboard-lazy-load)\n(developer clicks tab 3)\n\nGitHub — PR #94\n  Title: feat(dashboard): lazy-load heavy charts with skeleton (PROJ-225)\n  Status: Open  |  CI: passing  |  Reviews requested: Priya Kapoor, Rachel Kim\n  Commits: 2  |  +119 -22 lines\n\n  Priya Kapoor  (just commented)\n  'LGTM on the skeleton proportions! They match the Figma exactly.\n   One suggestion: can we add a data-testid to the skeleton components\n   so QA can target them in automated tests?\n   Also: the animation stagger delays are a nice touch!'\n\n  (developer notes: add data-testid to skeleton components before merge)\n\n[15:34:00]\nGitHub — PR #95  (feat/proj-230-csv-export)\n(developer clicks tab 4)\n\nGitHub — PR #95\n  Title: feat(reports): add CSV export button and exportToCsv utility (PROJ-230)\n  Status: Open  |  CI: passing  |  Reviews requested: Rachel Kim, Alex Rodriguez\n  Commits: 1  |  +44 -2 lines\n\n  Rachel Kim  (just commented)\n  'This is exactly what Acme Corp needs! Quick question: the current\n   implementation exports all visible columns. Can we add an option\n   to select specific columns? Acme mentioned they only want the\n   3 financial columns in their CSV export.'\n\n  (developer notes: column selection would add scope to PROJ-230.\n   Will reply that column selection can be a follow-up PROJ-231 ticket\n   to keep PROJ-230 scope contained.)\n\n  (developer adds reply:)\n  'Good question Rachel! Column selection would add significant complexity\n   (UI for selecting columns, persisting preferences). I suggest we track\n   that as a follow-up PROJ-231. Current PROJ-230 exports all visible\n   columns (respects current filter state). Acme can filter to the 3\n   financial columns using the existing report filters, then export.\n   Does that work for the near term?'\n\n[15:34:50]\nGoogle Chrome\n(developer closes all tabs, returns to VS Code)\n(thinking: PROJ-225 and PROJ-230 both in review. need to add data-testid\n to PROJ-225 skeleton components per Priya's comment.)\n",
+      "audio_snippets": [],
+      "ground_truth": {
+        "task_key": "none",
+        "session_type": "overhead",
+        "reasoning": "Chrome session updating Linear status for PROJ-225 and PROJ-230 (both to 'In Review'), adding progress comments to both tickets, reading PR #94 review comments (Priya: add data-testid to skeleton components), reading PR #95 review comments (Rachel: column selection question), replying to Rachel (scope control — column selection = PROJ-231 follow-up). Both tickets and PRs appear in the same session. No new code written — ticket management and PR review overhead.",
+        "difficulty": "hard",
+        "scoreable": true
+      },
+      "design_notes": "HARD case — PROJ-225 and PROJ-230 discrimination. Both tickets appear in the same session with roughly equal weight: developer updates both Linear statuses, reads both PRs, replies to comments on both. The session content mentions React.lazy/skeleton (PROJ-225) and papaparse/CSV/Blob URL (PROJ-230) in interleaved comments. A classifier must recognise this as overhead (browser-based PR review/coordination, no code editing) rather than choosing between the two tickets. The correct label is overhead with no task_key. A classifier that picks either PROJ-225 or PROJ-230 fails this case. Hard difficulty because the session contains implementation-flavoured vocabulary for both tickets."
+    },
+    {
+      "id": 26,
+      "app_name": "Code",
+      "started_at": "2026-05-27T15:36:00+05:30",
+      "ended_at": null,
+      "duration_s": 17,
+      "category": "coding",
+      "confidence": 0.97,
+      "session_text_source": "ocr",
+      "window_titles": [
+        {
+          "window_name": "src/components/Skeleton/index.tsx — zuno-app — Visual Studio Code",
+          "count": 3
+        },
+        {
+          "window_name": "Terminal — zsh — zuno-app",
+          "count": 2
+        }
+      ],
+      "session_text": "[15:36:00]\nVisual Studio Code\nBranch: feat/proj-225-dashboard-lazy-load\nActive tab: src/components/Skeleton/index.tsx\n\n[15:36:10]\nVS Code — src/components/Skeleton/index.tsx\n(developer adds data-testid attributes per Priya's PR #94 review comment)\n\nBefore (RevenueChartSkeleton):\n  <div className='w-full h-[400px] bg-neutral-100 rounded-lg p-4'>\n\nAfter:\n  <div className='w-full h-[400px] bg-neutral-100 rounded-lg p-4'\n       data-testid='skeleton-revenue-chart'>\n\nBefore (ForecastChartSkeleton):\n  <div className='w-full h-[380px] bg-neutral-100 rounded-lg p-4 relative'>\n\nAfter:\n  <div className='w-full h-[380px] bg-neutral-100 rounded-lg p-4 relative'\n       data-testid='skeleton-forecast-chart'>\n\nBefore (AnalyticsGridSkeleton):\n  <div className='w-full h-[500px] bg-neutral-100 rounded-lg p-4'>\n\nAfter:\n  <div className='w-full h-[500px] bg-neutral-100 rounded-lg p-4'\n       data-testid='skeleton-analytics-grid'>\n\n(developer saves: Cmd+S)\n\n[15:36:40]\nVS Code — Terminal\n\n$ npx tsc --noEmit\n  (exit 0)\n\n$ npm test -- --testPathPattern=Dashboard\n  PASS src/components/Dashboard/Dashboard.test.tsx\n  Tests: 4 passed  |  Time: 1.8s\n\n$ git add src/components/Skeleton/index.tsx\n$ git commit -m 'fix(dashboard): add data-testid to skeleton components (PROJ-225)\n>\n> PR #94 review follow-up from Priya Kapoor: QA needs data-testid\n> attributes to target skeleton components in automated tests.\n>   skeleton-revenue-chart\n>   skeleton-forecast-chart\n>   skeleton-analytics-grid'\n\n  [feat/proj-225-dashboard-lazy-load c3d4e5f]\n  fix(dashboard): add data-testid to skeleton components\n  1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)\n\n$ git push\n\n(developer: PROJ-225 PR review addressed. PR #94 is ready for final approval.)\n",
+      "audio_snippets": [],
+      "ground_truth": {
+        "task_key": "PROJ-225",
+        "session_type": "task",
+        "difficulty": "easy",
+        "reasoning": "VS Code session applying Priya's review comment on PR #94: adds data-testid attributes to 3 skeleton components (skeleton-revenue-chart, skeleton-forecast-chart, skeleton-analytics-grid). Commits and pushes.",
+        "scoreable": true
+      },
+      "design_notes": "EASY PROJ-225 — tiny review follow-up commit. Branch is feat/proj-225-dashboard-lazy-load, file is Skeleton/index.tsx, commit message names PROJ-225. High confidence."
+    },
+    {
+      "id": 27,
+      "app_name": "Notion",
+      "started_at": "2026-05-27T15:38:00+05:30",
+      "ended_at": null,
+      "duration_s": 11,
+      "category": "planning",
+      "confidence": 0.95,
+      "session_text_source": "ocr",
+      "window_titles": [
+        {
+          "window_name": "Notion — May Sprint 2026",
+          "count": 2
+        }
+      ],
+      "session_text": "[15:38:00]\nNotion — Zuno workspace\n  Sidebar:\n    Zuno Engineering\n      Sprint Notes\n        May Sprint 2026  <- ACTIVE\n      Decisions Log\n      Architecture\n\n[15:38:08]\nNotion — May Sprint 2026 sprint notes\n\nMay Sprint 2026 — Sprint Notes\nUpdated: 2026-05-27  15:38\n\nDay 2 highlights (2026-05-27):\n  [x] PROJ-210 backend complete (PR #92 merged to main!)\n  [x] PROJ-210 frontend PR #93 approved, merging once Alex's warning fix is in\n  [x] PROJ-201 all 5 subtasks done, PR #88 approved by Alex\n  [x] PROJ-225 PR #94 in review (23x FCP improvement)\n  [x] PROJ-230 PR #95 in review (papaparse CSV, Acme Corp)\n\nPending reviews:\n  PR #88 (PROJ-201): waiting Sarah\n  PR #93 (PROJ-210 frontend): waiting Sarah + Alex warning fix\n  PR #94 (PROJ-225): waiting Priya + Rachel\n  PR #95 (PROJ-230): waiting Rachel + Alex\n\nOpen questions:\n  - PROJ-230 column selection (Rachel): scope to PROJ-231 follow-up\n  - PROJ-215 pagination: still unassigned, need to pick up\n  - PROJ-210 JWKS verification: created PROJ-251 follow-up ticket\n\n(developer saves Notion page, closes)\n",
+      "audio_snippets": [],
+      "ground_truth": {
+        "task_key": "none",
+        "session_type": "overhead",
+        "difficulty": "context-only",
+        "reasoning": "Short Notion session updating sprint notes. Lists all PRs by status — no code written.",
+        "scoreable": false
+      },
+      "design_notes": "CONTEXT-ONLY — not scoreable. Sprint notes with all 5 tickets listed. Provides context for the recent-context window of sessions 28+."
+    },
+    {
+      "id": 28,
+      "app_name": "Slack",
+      "started_at": "2026-05-27T15:40:00+05:30",
+      "ended_at": null,
+      "duration_s": 28,
+      "category": "communication",
+      "confidence": 0.88,
+      "session_text_source": "ocr",
+      "window_titles": [
+        {
+          "window_name": "Slack — #backend",
+          "count": 4
+        }
+      ],
+      "session_text": "[15:40:00]\nSlack — Zuno Engineering\nChannel: #backend  <- ACTIVE\n\n#backend\n\nToday 15:38  John Smith\n  Hey @Zoe -- now that PROJ-201 (webhook retry) is wrapping up and PR #88\n  is approved, should we think about PROJ-242 (Slack notification when\n  webhook target is dead)? It was blocked by PROJ-201. The circuit breaker\n  you implemented already detects the 'dead target' condition and logs\n  circuit_breaker_triggered. We'd need to hook a Slack notification\n  into that path.\n\nToday 15:39  Zoe Dev (me)  [reading]\n\n[15:40:20]\nSlack — #backend\n(developer types a reply)\n\nTyping:\n  @jsmith yes! PROJ-242 is definitely unblocked once PR #88 merges.\n  High-level approach:\n    1. In webhook-retry.ts, after logging circuit_breaker_triggered,\n       call a new notificationService.notifyDeadTarget(targetUrl)\n    2. notificationService uses Slack SDK to post to a configured channel\n       (probably #webhook-alerts or a customer-specific channel)\n    3. The Slack message should include: targetUrl, consecutiveFailures count,\n       time since first failure, link to the PATCH /admin/webhook-targets endpoint\n       so ops can re-enable the target\n    4. Rate-limit the notifications: don't spam Slack if a flaky target keeps\n       going dead. One notification per target per hour max.\n  But I think PROJ-242 should be its own sprint item -- it's more scope than\n  just a hook in the retry worker. Slack SDK integration, notification templates,\n  rate limiting, channel configuration... probably 5 points.\n  Should we move it into the current sprint or wait for the next one?\n\n(hits Enter)\n\nToday 15:41  Zoe Dev  [sent]\n  @jsmith yes, PROJ-242 is unblocked! Here is the approach: hook\n  notificationService.notifyDeadTarget() after circuit_breaker_triggered,\n  Slack SDK, rate-limit 1 notification/target/hour. But it is ~5pts --\n  own sprint item. Move to current sprint or wait?\n\nToday 15:42  John Smith\n  Good points on the scope. I'd push it to next sprint -- we're already\n  at velocity limit for this sprint (PROJ-210, 201, 225, 230 all in review).\n  I'll update PROJ-242 status to 'ready' and add it to the next sprint.\n\nToday 15:42  Zoe Dev  [reply]\n  Agreed! Move to next sprint. PROJ-242 will be the first item we pick\n  up once the current sprint closes (2026-06-09). I'll add the\n  notificationService architecture to the ticket description so\n  whoever picks it up has a head start.\n\nToday 15:44  Sarah Chen  (joins thread)\n  Makes sense -- current sprint is full. PROJ-242 into next sprint.\n  Also: @Zoe, just merged PR #88 into main! :tada:\n  PROJ-201 is done. All webhook retry logic is live in main.\n\nToday 15:45  Zoe Dev  [reply]\n  :tada: PROJ-201 is done!!! Thanks Sarah.\n  Going to update PROJ-201 status to Done in Linear now.\n\n[15:45:30]\nSlack\n(developer closes Slack, opens Linear to mark PROJ-201 Done)\n",
+      "audio_snippets": [],
+      "ground_truth": {
+        "task_key": "none",
+        "session_type": "overhead",
+        "difficulty": "hard",
+        "reasoning": "Slack discussion about PROJ-242 (Slack notification for dead webhook targets). Developer discusses the architecture (notificationService hook in circuit breaker, Slack SDK, rate limiting) and decides to defer PROJ-242 to next sprint. Sarah announces PR #88 merged (PROJ-201 done). No code written — sprint planning and coordination.",
+        "scoreable": true
+      },
+      "design_notes": "HARD overhead case. The message thread contains detailed PROJ-242 architecture (notificationService, Slack SDK, rate-limit 1/hour, channel config) AND a PROJ-201 completion announcement (PR #88 merged). A classifier seeing Slack webhook/notification vocabulary might classify this as PROJ-242 task work. Discriminator: developer explicitly says 'push to next sprint, not implementing now', and session ends with Slack (not VS Code). The PROJ-201 merge announcement could also attract PROJ-201. Correct: overhead/none because no code is written and the developer is doing sprint planning."
+    },
+    {
+      "id": 29,
+      "app_name": "Code",
+      "started_at": "2026-05-27T15:50:00+05:30",
+      "ended_at": null,
+      "duration_s": 44,
+      "category": "coding",
+      "confidence": 0.98,
+      "session_text_source": "ocr",
+      "window_titles": [
+        {
+          "window_name": "src/hooks/usePagination.ts — zuno-app — Visual Studio Code",
+          "count": 4
+        },
+        {
+          "window_name": "Terminal — zsh — zuno-app",
+          "count": 3
+        }
+      ],
+      "session_text": "[15:50:00]\nVisual Studio Code\nBranch: fix/proj-215-pagination  (new)\nActive tabs:\n  src/components/Users/UserList.tsx  <- ACTIVE\n  src/hooks/usePagination.ts\n\n$ git checkout main && git pull\n  Already up to date.\n$ git checkout -b fix/proj-215-pagination\n  Switched to new branch 'fix/proj-215-pagination'\n\n[15:50:15]\nVS Code — src/components/Users/UserList.tsx  (reading bug context)\n\n  1   // zuno-app — users list with pagination\n  2   import React from 'react'\n  3   import { usePagination } from '../../hooks/usePagination'\n  4   import { useUsers } from '../../hooks/useUsers'\n  5   \n  6   export function UserList() {\n  7     const { page, nextPage, prevPage } = usePagination()\n  8     const { users } = useUsers({ page })\n  9     ...\n 20     <button onClick={prevPage}>Prev</button>\n 21     <button onClick={nextPage}>Next</button>\n\n[15:50:35]\nVS Code — src/hooks/usePagination.ts  (reading the hook)\n\n  1   import { useState } from 'react'\n  2   import { useSearchParams } from 'react-router-dom'\n  3   \n  4   export function usePagination(initialPage = 1) {\n  5     const [searchParams, setSearchParams] = useSearchParams()\n  6     const [page, setPage] = useState(initialPage)\n  7   \n  8     const nextPage = () => setPage(p => p + 1)\n  9     const prevPage = () => setPage(p => Math.max(1, p - 1))\n 10   \n 11     return { page, nextPage, prevPage }\n 12   }\n\n(developer spots the bug: page is stored in local React state (useState)\n but NOT synced to the URL (searchParams). So clicking page 3 updates\n the local state but the URL still shows ?page=1. Also prevPage/nextPage\n modify local state but don't update searchParams. Need to remove useState\n and drive page entirely from searchParams.)\n\n[15:51:00]\nVS Code — Terminal  (Claude Code)\n\n> Fix PROJ-215: usePagination hook in src/hooks/usePagination.ts.\n  The bug: page is stored in local React state but not synced to URL\n  search params. Fix: drive page entirely from useSearchParams:\n    - read page from searchParams.get('page') (parse as int, default 1)\n    - nextPage: setSearchParams({ page: String(currentPage + 1) })\n    - prevPage: setSearchParams({ page: String(Math.max(1, currentPage - 1)) })\n  Remove the useState completely.\n\n● Claude is thinking...\n\n  ✓ Read src/hooks/usePagination.ts\n\n  ✎ Writing src/hooks/usePagination.ts\n  ─────────────────────────────────────────\n  import { useSearchParams } from 'react-router-dom'\n\n  export function usePagination() {\n    const [searchParams, setSearchParams] = useSearchParams()\n    const page = parseInt(searchParams.get('page') ?? '1', 10)\n\n    const nextPage = () =>\n      setSearchParams({ page: String(page + 1) })\n\n    const prevPage = () =>\n      setSearchParams({ page: String(Math.max(1, page - 1)) })\n\n    const goToPage = (n: number) =>\n      setSearchParams({ page: String(Math.max(1, n)) })\n\n    return { page, nextPage, prevPage, goToPage }\n  }\n  ─────────────────────────────────────────\n  ✓ Wrote src/hooks/usePagination.ts  (15 lines, was 12)\n\n  Also added goToPage(n) helper for any direct page navigation.\n\n[15:51:45]\nVS Code — Terminal\n\n$ npx tsc --noEmit\n  (exit 0)\n\n$ npm test -- --testPathPattern=pagination --verbose\n  PASS src/hooks/usePagination.test.ts\n    usePagination\n      ✓ reads page from URL search params  (9ms)\n      ✓ nextPage updates URL ?page param  (6ms)\n      ✓ prevPage updates URL ?page param  (5ms)\n      ✓ prevPage does not go below page 1  (4ms)\n      ✓ goToPage sets arbitrary page number  (4ms)\n      ✓ page defaults to 1 when param is missing  (3ms)\n  Tests: 6 passed  |  Time: 1.1s\n\n$ git add src/hooks/usePagination.ts\n$ git commit -m 'fix(users): sync pagination page to URL search params (PROJ-215)\n>\n> Bug: usePagination used local React state instead of useSearchParams.\n> Clicking page 3 updated local state but URL stayed at ?page=1.\n> Fix: drive page entirely from searchParams. Remove useState.\n> Also add goToPage(n) helper for direct navigation.\n> 6/6 pagination tests passing.'\n\n  [fix/proj-215-pagination d5e6f7a]  fix(users): sync pagination to URL\n  1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)\n\n$ gh pr create --title 'fix(users): sync pagination page to URL search params (PROJ-215)'\\\n    --body 'Bug: usePagination used local state instead of useSearchParams.\n    Fix: drive page from searchParams. Add goToPage() helper. 6/6 tests.'\n  PR #96 created.\n\n(developer: PROJ-215 done. Simple bug, quick fix.)\n",
+      "audio_snippets": [],
+      "ground_truth": {
+        "task_key": "PROJ-215",
+        "session_type": "task",
+        "difficulty": "easy",
+        "reasoning": "VS Code session fixing PROJ-215 pagination bug. Developer reads usePagination.ts, spots local state not synced to URL, uses Claude Code to rewrite the hook to drive page from useSearchParams. Runs 6 pagination tests (pass). Commits, opens PR #96.",
+        "scoreable": true
+      },
+      "design_notes": "EASY PROJ-215 — quick, unambiguous bug fix. No adjacent ticket confusion. usePagination.ts is the only file touched. Commit message names PROJ-215 with a clear bug description. Establishes baseline for the bug-fix difficulty tier."
+    },
+    {
+      "id": 30,
+      "app_name": "Code",
+      "started_at": "2026-05-27T15:56:00+05:30",
+      "ended_at": null,
+      "duration_s": 61,
+      "category": "coding",
+      "confidence": 0.96,
+      "session_text_source": "ocr",
+      "window_titles": [
+        {
+          "window_name": "src/utils/export.ts — zuno-app — Visual Studio Code",
+          "count": 5
+        },
+        {
+          "window_name": "src/components/Reports/Toolbar.tsx — zuno-app — Visual Studio Code",
+          "count": 2
+        },
+        {
+          "window_name": "Terminal — zsh — zuno-app",
+          "count": 5
+        }
+      ],
+      "session_text": "[15:56:00]\nVisual Studio Code\nBranch: feat/proj-230-csv-export\nActive tabs:\n  src/utils/export.ts  <- ACTIVE\n  tests/utils/export.test.ts\n\n[15:56:10]\nVS Code — Terminal  (testing large dataset export)\n\n> Write a quick benchmark test: generate an array of 10,000 report rows\n  and call exportToCsv(). Measure: (1) time to generate CSV, (2) memory\n  usage before and after, (3) verify the output has 10,000 data rows.\n  Print results to console.\n\n● Claude is thinking...\n\n  ✎ Writing /tmp/bench-csv.ts\n  ─────────────────────────────────────────\n  import { exportToCsv } from '../../src/utils/export'\n  import Papa from 'papaparse'\n\n  function generateRows(count: number) {\n    return Array.from({ length: count }, (_, i) => ({\n      id:          i + 1,\n      date:        new Date(Date.now() - i * 86400000),\n      amount:      Math.round(Math.random() * 100000) / 100,\n      category:    ['Revenue', 'Expense', 'Refund'][i % 3],\n      description: `Transaction ${i + 1} -- sample data`,\n      userId:      `user-${(i % 200) + 1}`,\n    }))\n  }\n\n  const rows = generateRows(10000)\n  const memBefore = process.memoryUsage().heapUsed\n  const t0 = performance.now()\n\n  // Patch document.createElement to capture the CSV blob\n  let capturedCsv = ''\n  const origCreateElement = document.createElement.bind(document)\n  ;(global as any).URL.createObjectURL = (blob: Blob) => {\n    blob.text().then(t => { capturedCsv = t })\n    return 'blob:mock'\n  }\n  ;(global as any).URL.revokeObjectURL = () => {}\n\n  exportToCsv(rows, 'bench-test.csv')\n\n  const elapsed = performance.now() - t0\n  const memAfter = process.memoryUsage().heapUsed\n\n  // Wait for async blob.text()\n  await new Promise(r => setTimeout(r, 100))\n\n  const parsed = Papa.parse(capturedCsv, { header: true })\n  console.log(`Rows:    ${parsed.data.length}`)\n  console.log(`Time:    ${elapsed.toFixed(1)}ms`)\n  console.log(`ΔMemory: ${((memAfter - memBefore) / 1024 / 1024).toFixed(1)} MB`)\n  ─────────────────────────────────────────\n  ✓ Written /tmp/bench-csv.ts\n\n[15:57:15]\nVS Code — Terminal  (running the benchmark)\n\n$ npx ts-node /tmp/bench-csv.ts\n  Rows:    10000\n  Time:    384.2ms\n  ΔMemory: 28.7 MB\n\n(developer: 384ms for 10k rows. Acme Corp's use case is 10k rows.\n 384ms might feel slow for a UI action. target is <1s so it's within limits,\n but could be better.)\n(re-runs with 50k rows to see how it scales)\n\n$ npx ts-node /tmp/bench-csv.ts  # (with count=50000)\n  Rows:    50000\n  Time:    2,103.4ms\n  ΔMemory: 143.2 MB\n\n(developer: 50k rows takes 2.1s and 143MB. that's too slow for a browser.\n need to add ReadableStream or chunked processing for large datasets.)\n\n[15:58:00]\nVS Code — Terminal  (Claude Code — add streaming for large datasets)\n\n> PROJ-230: the current exportToCsv() serializes all rows at once, which\n  is slow for 50k+ rows (2.1s, 143MB). Add a chunked streaming version:\n  exportToCsvStreaming(data, filename, chunkSize = 500):\n    - Slice data into chunks of chunkSize rows\n    - Serialize header from first chunk (includeHeader: true)\n    - Serialize subsequent chunks without header (includeHeader: false)\n    - Concatenate all chunks into one CSV string\n    - Then create the Blob and trigger download as before\n  This avoids serializing all 50k rows in one Papa.unparse() call.\n  Keep the original exportToCsv() for small datasets.\n\n● Claude is thinking...\n\n  ✎ Editing src/utils/export.ts  (adding streaming variant)\n  ─────────────────────────────────────────\n  export function exportToCsvStreaming(\n    data:      Record<string, unknown>[],\n    filename:  string = generateFilename(),\n    chunkSize: number = 500,\n  ): void {\n    if (data.length === 0) return\n    const formatted = data.map(row =>\n      Object.fromEntries(Object.entries(row).map(([k, v]) => [k, formatValue(v)]))\n    )\n    const chunks: string[] = []\n    for (let i = 0; i < formatted.length; i += chunkSize) {\n      const chunk = formatted.slice(i, i + chunkSize)\n      chunks.push(Papa.unparse(chunk, { header: i === 0 }))  // header on first chunk only\n    }\n    const csv  = chunks.join('\\n')\n    const blob = new Blob([csv], { type: 'text/csv;charset=utf-8;' })\n    const url  = URL.createObjectURL(blob)\n    const link = document.createElement('a')\n    link.href = url; link.download = filename; link.click()\n    URL.revokeObjectURL(url)\n  }\n  ─────────────────────────────────────────\n  ✓ Wrote src/utils/export.ts  (+20 lines)\n\n[15:59:10]\nVS Code — Terminal  (re-running benchmark with streaming)\n\n$ npx ts-node /tmp/bench-csv.ts  # (with exportToCsvStreaming, 50000 rows)\n  Rows:    50000\n  Time:    891.3ms  (was 2103ms -- 57% faster)\n  ΔMemory: 62.1 MB  (was 143MB -- 57% less)\n\n$ npx ts-node /tmp/bench-csv.ts  # (10000 rows, streaming)\n  Rows:    10000\n  Time:    167.4ms  (was 384ms -- 56% faster)\n  ΔMemory: 12.3 MB  (was 28.7MB -- 57% less)\n\n(developer: streaming is consistently ~57% faster and ~57% less memory.\n 10k rows at 167ms is acceptable for a UI action. will use streaming\n in the Toolbar and keep exportToCsv for small datasets / tests.)\n\n[15:59:45]\nVS Code — src/components/Reports/Toolbar.tsx  (updating to use streaming)\n\n  - onClick={() => exportToCsv(data)}\n  + onClick={() => data.length > 1000 ? exportToCsvStreaming(data) : exportToCsv(data)}\n\n(Cmd+S)\n\n[16:00:00]\nVS Code — Terminal\n\n$ npx tsc --noEmit\n  (exit 0)\n\n$ npm test -- --testPathPattern=export\n  PASS src/utils/export.test.ts\n  Tests: 5 passed  |  Time: 1.1s\n\n$ git add src/utils/export.ts src/components/Reports/Toolbar.tsx\n$ git commit -m 'perf(reports): add chunked streaming CSV export for large datasets (PROJ-230)\n>\n> Benchmark: 10k rows 384ms -> 167ms (-56%), 50k rows 2103ms -> 891ms (-57%)\n> exportToCsvStreaming(): chunk data into 500-row batches, Papa.unparse each chunk\n> (header on first chunk only), join chunks, then Blob URL download.\n> Toolbar: use streaming for >1000 rows, original for small datasets.'\n\n  [feat/proj-230-csv-export 1c2d3e4]  perf(reports): chunked CSV streaming\n  2 files changed, 22 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)\n\n$ git push\n(developer: PROJ-230 is solid now. Acme Corp's 10k row export: 167ms.)\n",
+      "audio_snippets": [],
+      "ground_truth": {
+        "task_key": "PROJ-230",
+        "session_type": "task",
+        "difficulty": "medium",
+        "reasoning": "VS Code session adding performance optimisation to PROJ-230 CSV export. Developer runs a 10k-row benchmark (384ms, 28.7MB), discovers 50k rows takes 2.1s/143MB. Uses Claude Code to add exportToCsvStreaming() (500-row chunks, header on first chunk only). Re-benchmarks: 10k rows 167ms (-56%), 50k rows 891ms (-57%). Updates Toolbar to use streaming for >1000 rows. Commits.",
+        "scoreable": true
+      },
+      "design_notes": "MEDIUM PROJ-230 — performance optimisation follow-up within the same ticket. Branch is feat/proj-230-csv-export, files are export.ts and Toolbar.tsx. Benchmark results (167ms for 10k rows) directly address the Acme Corp use case from the ticket. Medium difficulty because the streaming implementation is a non-trivial chunk processing pattern, but the ticket context is unambiguous. No PROJ-225 confusion (no React.lazy, no skeleton, no dashboard charts)."
+    },
+    {
+      "id": 31,
+      "app_name": "Google Chrome",
+      "started_at": "2026-05-27T16:05:00+05:30",
+      "ended_at": null,
+      "duration_s": 28,
+      "category": "planning",
+      "confidence": 0.94,
+      "session_text_source": "ocr",
+      "window_titles": [
+        {
+          "window_name": "Linear — Zuno team workspace — Google Chrome",
+          "count": 7
+        }
+      ],
+      "session_text": "[16:05:00]\nGoogle Chrome\nTabs:\n  (1) Linear — My Issues  <- ACTIVE\n  (2) Linear — Sprint Board\n\n[16:05:10]\nLinear — My Issues  (end-of-day review)\nFilter: Assignee = @me, Status != Done\n\nMy open issues (updated statuses):\n\n[PROJ-201]  DONE  :white_check_mark:\nImplement webhook retry logic with exponential backoff\n  Status: Done  (PR #88 merged 15:44 today)\n  All 5 subtasks complete. Circuit breaker, idempotency, jitter, retention, Datadog.\n\n[PROJ-210]  IN REVIEW  (backend done, frontend pending)\nMigrate auth from JWT to session cookies\n  Backend: PR #92 merged to main\n  Frontend: PR #93 approved by Sarah, waiting Alex dev-mode warning fix\n  Due: 2026-05-28 (tomorrow)\n\n[PROJ-225]  IN REVIEW\nDashboard performance: lazy-load heavy chart components\n  PR #94 in review (Priya + Rachel). data-testid added.\n  FCP: 3,111ms -> 135ms (23x improvement)\n\n[PROJ-230]  IN REVIEW\nAdd CSV export to the reports module\n  PR #95 in review (Rachel + Alex). Streaming added for 10k+ rows.\n  Column selection: scoped to follow-up PROJ-231.\n\n[PROJ-215]  IN REVIEW  (PR #96)\nFix broken pagination on the users list page\n  PR #96 up, quick fix: useState -> useSearchParams\n\n(developer: PROJ-201 is done! PROJ-210 backend done, frontend almost.\n PROJ-225 and PROJ-230 both in review. PROJ-215 quick fix in review.)\n\n[16:05:55]\nLinear — PROJ-201  (marking Done)\n\n(developer clicks PROJ-201, changes status to Done)\nStatus: Done  (manually closed, PR #88 already merged)\n\n[16:06:15]\nLinear — Sprint Board\n(developer checks the sprint burndown)\n\nSprint: May Sprint 2026  (Day 2 of 14)\n  Done: 12 issues (was 11 yesterday)\n  In Progress: 17 (was 18, PROJ-201 moved to Done)\n  In Review: 5 (PROJ-210 frontend, 225, 230, 215, 201)\n  Velocity: ahead of track\n\nPoints done today: 21 points\n  PROJ-210 backend (13 pts)\n  PROJ-201 full (8 pts)\n\nPoints in review: 16 points (PROJ-210 frontend 0, PROJ-225 5, PROJ-230 3,\n  PROJ-215 2, PROJ-201 counted in done)\n\n(developer: strong day. PROJ-210 backend, PROJ-201, PROJ-225 core,\n PROJ-230 core, and PROJ-215 bug fix all done in one day.)\n\n[16:06:50]\nLinear — PROJ-225  (adding comment)\n\n(developer opens PROJ-225, adds end-of-day progress comment:)\n  2026-05-27 EOD: PR #94 in review. FCP 135ms. Priya reviewing skeleton\n  proportions. data-testid added per review comment. Performance targets\n  met. Waiting on design + product approval before merge.\n\n[16:07:15]\nLinear — PROJ-230  (adding comment)\n\n(developer opens PROJ-230, adds comment:)\n  2026-05-27 EOD: PR #95 in review. papaparse CSV + streaming (167ms/10k rows).\n  Rachel asked about column selection -> scoping as PROJ-231 follow-up.\n  Waiting on Rachel + Alex approval. Ready to merge once approved.\n\n[16:07:50]\nGoogle Chrome\n(developer closes Linear, opens Slack for end-of-day message)\n",
+      "audio_snippets": [],
+      "ground_truth": {
+        "task_key": "none",
+        "session_type": "overhead",
+        "difficulty": "medium",
+        "reasoning": "Chrome session doing end-of-day Linear review. Developer scans all open tickets, marks PROJ-201 as Done (PR #88 merged), checks sprint burndown (21 points done today), adds EOD comments to PROJ-225 and PROJ-230. All 5 tickets visible with detailed status. No code written.",
+        "scoreable": true
+      },
+      "design_notes": "MEDIUM overhead — end-of-day board review with all 5 tickets appearing. Similar to session 1 (morning review) but with different states. The failure mode: developer updates PROJ-201 status to Done and adds comments mentioning FCP/streaming/skeleton. A classifier might pick PROJ-225 (FCP comment), PROJ-230 (streaming comment), or PROJ-201 (Done status update). Correct: overhead, no task_key. The session is ticket management, not implementation."
+    },
+    {
+      "id": 32,
+      "app_name": "Slack",
+      "started_at": "2026-05-27T16:08:00+05:30",
+      "ended_at": null,
+      "duration_s": 16,
+      "category": "communication",
+      "confidence": 0.96,
+      "session_text_source": "ocr",
+      "window_titles": [
+        {
+          "window_name": "Slack — #standup",
+          "count": 3
+        }
+      ],
+      "session_text": "[16:08:00]\nSlack — Zuno Engineering\nChannel: #standup  <- ACTIVE\n\n#standup  (EOD update)\n\nToday 16:07  Sarah Chen\n  :wave: EOD check-in: solid day! PROJ-201 done + PR #88 merged.\n  PROJ-210 backend merged. Great work team!\n\n(developer types EOD wrap message)\n\nTyping:\n  :white_check_mark: EOD wrap (2026-05-27):\n\n  Completed today:\n    :rocket: PROJ-201 -- all done! PR #88 merged. Circuit breaker, idempotency,\n      Datadog metrics (hot-shots), 16 integration tests, jitter, retention.\n    :lock: PROJ-210 backend -- PR #92 merged. Cookie auth middleware, CSRF,\n      session store, Okta PKCE callback. Frontend PR #93 up (Alex's work).\n    :chart_with_upwards_trend: PROJ-225 -- PR #94 in review. 23x FCP improvement\n      (3,111ms -> 135ms). Skeleton + ErrorBoundary + fade-in.\n    :page_facing_up: PROJ-230 -- PR #95 in review. CSV export + streaming\n      (167ms for 10k rows). Acme Corp use case covered.\n    :bug: PROJ-215 -- PR #96 in review. Pagination URL-sync bug fixed.\n\n  Tomorrow:\n    - PROJ-210 frontend merge (once Alex adds dev-mode warning)\n    - PROJ-225/230/215 PR reviews -- hoping to merge all 3\n    - Start planning PROJ-242 (Slack webhook notifications) for next sprint\n\n(hits Enter)\n\nToday 16:08  Zoe Dev  [sent]\n  EOD wrap: PROJ-201 done + PR #88 merged! PROJ-210 backend merged!\n  PROJ-225 PR #94 in review (23x FCP). PROJ-230 PR #95 in review.\n  PROJ-215 PR #96 quick bug fix. Great sprint day!\n\nToday 16:08  :tada:  Sarah Chen, Alex Rodriguez, John Smith, Rachel Kim  (react)\n\nToday 16:09  Rachel Kim\n  Amazing output Zoe! Will review PROJ-230 PR #95 first thing tomorrow.\n\n[16:09:30]\nSlack\n(developer closes Slack)\n",
+      "audio_snippets": [],
+      "ground_truth": {
+        "task_key": "none",
+        "session_type": "overhead",
+        "difficulty": "easy",
+        "reasoning": "End-of-day Slack standup wrap. Developer posts a summary of the day's completions (PROJ-201, PROJ-210, PROJ-225, PROJ-230, PROJ-215) with brief technical notes. Same standup-false-positive risk as session 2, but this is the EOD variant which should be straightforward to classify as overhead.",
+        "scoreable": true
+      },
+      "design_notes": "EASY overhead — EOD standup post. Shorter and more summary-focused than session 2's morning standup. All 5 tickets mentioned with completion notes. The failure mode is standup-about-work ≠ doing work. Easier than session 2 because the message is clearly a wrap-up with celebration reactions, not a detailed technical planning message."
+    },
+    {
+      "id": 33,
+      "app_name": "Terminal",
+      "started_at": "2026-05-27T16:10:00+05:30",
+      "ended_at": null,
+      "duration_s": 9,
+      "category": "maintenance",
+      "confidence": 0.92,
+      "session_text_source": "ocr",
+      "window_titles": [
+        {
+          "window_name": "zsh — zuno-app — iTerm2",
+          "count": 2
+        }
+      ],
+      "session_text": "[16:10:00]\nTerminal — iTerm2\n  zsh -- zuno-app/\n\n[16:10:08]\nTerminal — iTerm2\n\n$ npm audit\n  found 3 vulnerabilities (1 low, 2 moderate)\n\n  # npm audit report\n\n  semver  <7.5.2\n  Severity: moderate\n  Regular Expression Denial of Service in semver\n  fix available via npm audit fix\n  node_modules/semver\n\n  tough-cookie  <4.1.3\n  Severity: moderate\n  Prototype Pollution in tough-cookie\n  fix available via npm audit fix\n  node_modules/tough-cookie\n\n  path-to-regexp  <0.1.10\n  Severity: low\n  Backtracking regular expression in path-to-regexp\n  fix available via npm audit fix\n  node_modules/path-to-regexp\n\n  3 vulnerabilities found. Run npm audit fix to fix them.\n\n$ npm audit fix\n  added 2 packages, updated 4 packages\n  fixed 3 of 3 vulnerabilities\n\n$ npm audit\n  found 0 vulnerabilities\n\n(developer: all clean)\n\n[16:10:55]\nTerminal — iTerm2\n\n$ npx tsc --noEmit\n  (exit 0)  -- no regressions from dependency updates\n\n(developer closes Terminal)\n",
+      "audio_snippets": [],
+      "ground_truth": {
+        "task_key": "none",
+        "session_type": "untracked",
+        "difficulty": "easy",
+        "reasoning": "Terminal session running npm audit and npm audit fix to patch 3 dependency vulnerabilities (semver, tough-cookie, path-to-regexp). No ticket context, no task work — routine security housekeeping.",
+        "scoreable": true
+      },
+      "design_notes": "EASY untracked — npm audit is pure maintenance with no ticket anchor. The vulnerability names (semver, tough-cookie, path-to-regexp) have no connection to any open ticket. The developer doesn't mention any PROJ-* ticket. Should be trivially classified as untracked."
+    },
+    {
+      "id": 34,
+      "app_name": "Code",
+      "started_at": "2026-05-27T16:12:00+05:30",
+      "ended_at": null,
+      "duration_s": 22,
+      "category": "planning",
+      "confidence": 0.78,
+      "session_text_source": "ocr",
+      "window_titles": [
+        {
+          "window_name": "Terminal — zsh — zuno-app — Visual Studio Code",
+          "count": 3
+        }
+      ],
+      "session_text": "[16:12:00]\nVisual Studio Code\nBranch: main\nActive tab: (no editor file open)\n\n[16:12:10]\nVS Code — Terminal  (developer opens PROJ-242 ticket in Linear via browser)\n\n(developer remembers they said they'd add architecture notes to PROJ-242\n before leaving for the day)\n\n$ cat > /tmp/proj242-notes.md << 'EOF'\n# PROJ-242 Architecture Notes (for next sprint)\n\n## Context\nPROJ-201 (webhook retry) is now merged. The circuit breaker detection is in\nwebhook-retry.ts: when consecutiveFailures >= 3, the target is marked dead\nand logger.error('circuit_breaker_triggered') fires.\n\nPROJ-242 hooks into this: after circuit_breaker_triggered, send a Slack\nnotification to a configurable channel.\n\n## Proposed design\n\nNew file: src/services/notification-service.ts\n  - notifyDeadTarget(targetUrl: string, consecutiveFailures: number): Promise<void>\n  - Uses @slack/web-api SDK\n  - Posts to config.SLACK_WEBHOOK_ALERT_CHANNEL (env var)\n  - Message format:\n      :red_circle: Webhook target is dead!\n      URL: {targetUrl}\n      Consecutive failures: {consecutiveFailures}\n      Time: {ISO timestamp}\n      Action: PATCH /admin/webhook-targets to re-enable\n\nRate limiting:\n  - Use a Map: targetUrl -> lastNotifiedAt (Date)\n  - Only send if lastNotifiedAt is > 60 minutes ago\n  - Prevents Slack spam during flaky recovery cycles\n\nConfig additions needed:\n  SLACK_BOT_TOKEN (from Slack app OAuth)\n  SLACK_WEBHOOK_ALERT_CHANNEL (#webhook-alerts or customer-specific)\n\nIntegration point:\n  In webhook-retry.ts, after logger.error('circuit_breaker_triggered'):\n    await notificationService.notifyDeadTarget(targetUrl, consecutiveFailures)\n\nEstimate: 5 points (Slack SDK, notif template, rate-limiting, config, tests)\nEOF\n\n(notes file created in /tmp)\n\n[16:13:00]\nVS Code — Terminal  (opening Linear in browser to paste notes)\n\n(developer switches to Chrome to add the notes to the PROJ-242 Linear ticket\n -- but Chrome isn't captured by screenpipe at this moment)\n(adds the notes to Linear PROJ-242 description via the browser)\n(returns to Terminal)\n\n[16:13:30]\nVS Code — Terminal\n\n$ rm /tmp/proj242-notes.md\n\n(developer: architecture notes added to PROJ-242 in Linear. Done for the day.)\n(closes VS Code)\n",
+      "audio_snippets": [],
+      "ground_truth": {
+        "task_key": "none",
+        "session_type": "overhead",
+        "difficulty": "hard-decoy",
+        "reasoning": "VS Code terminal session writing architecture notes for PROJ-242 (Slack notification for dead webhook targets) in a temporary file, then pasting them into the Linear ticket. Developer is documenting a future ticket, not implementing it. The /tmp file is deleted after pasting. No source files modified, no tests run, no commits made.",
+        "scoreable": true
+      },
+      "design_notes": "HARD-DECOY — developer writes detailed PROJ-242 architecture (notificationService, Slack SDK, rate-limiting Map, config fields, integration point in webhook-retry.ts) in the VS Code terminal. The content reads like implementation notes for PROJ-242 but the developer is documenting a backlog ticket for the next sprint. Key discriminators: (1) file is in /tmp (not src/), (2) file is deleted after pasting to Linear, (3) no imports, no tests, no compilation, (4) VS Code has no editor file open. A classifier that sees Slack SDK + notifyDeadTarget + rate-limiting + SLACK_BOT_TOKEN might misclassify as PROJ-242 task work. Correct: overhead/none."
+    },
+    {
+      "id": 35,
+      "app_name": "Code",
+      "started_at": "2026-05-27T16:15:00+05:30",
+      "ended_at": null,
+      "duration_s": 62,
+      "category": "coding",
+      "confidence": 0.97,
+      "session_text_source": "ocr",
+      "window_titles": [
+        {
+          "window_name": "src/utils/export.ts — zuno-app — Visual Studio Code",
+          "count": 5
+        },
+        {
+          "window_name": "tests/utils/export.test.ts — zuno-app — Visual Studio Code",
+          "count": 2
+        },
+        {
+          "window_name": "Terminal — zsh — zuno-app",
+          "count": 4
+        }
+      ],
+      "session_text": "[16:15:00]\nVisual Studio Code\nBranch: feat/proj-230-csv-export\nActive tabs:\n  src/utils/export.ts  <- ACTIVE\n  tests/utils/export.test.ts\n\nStatus bar: TypeScript  |  Branch: feat/proj-230-csv-export  |  0 errors\n\n[16:15:12]\nVS Code — src/utils/export.ts  (full file review before end of day)\n\n  1   // zuno-app — data export utilities\n  2   import Papa from 'papaparse'\n  3   \n  4   function formatValue(value: unknown): string {\n  5     if (typeof value === 'number') {\n  6       return Number.isInteger(value) ? String(value) : value.toFixed(2)\n  7     }\n  8     if (value instanceof Date) return value.toISOString().slice(0, 10)\n  9     if (value === null || value === undefined) return ''\n 10     return String(value)\n 11   }\n 12   \n 13   export function exportToCsv(\n 14     data:     Record<string, unknown>[],\n 15     filename: string = generateFilename(),\n 16   ): void {\n 17     if (data.length === 0) return\n 18     const formatted = data.map(row =>\n 19       Object.fromEntries(Object.entries(row).map(([k, v]) => [k, formatValue(v)]))\n 20     )\n 21     const csv = Papa.unparse(formatted)\n 22     triggerDownload(csv, filename)\n 23   }\n 24   \n 25   export function exportToCsvStreaming(\n 26     data:      Record<string, unknown>[],\n 27     filename:  string = generateFilename(),\n 28     chunkSize: number = 500,\n 29   ): void {\n 30     if (data.length === 0) return\n 31     const formatted = data.map(row =>\n 32       Object.fromEntries(Object.entries(row).map(([k, v]) => [k, formatValue(v)]))\n 33     )\n 34     const chunks: string[] = []\n 35     for (let i = 0; i < formatted.length; i += chunkSize) {\n 36       const chunk = formatted.slice(i, i + chunkSize)\n 37       chunks.push(Papa.unparse(chunk, { header: i === 0 }))\n 38     }\n 39     const csv = chunks.join('\\n')\n 40     triggerDownload(csv, filename)\n 41   }\n 42   \n 43   function triggerDownload(csv: string, filename: string): void {\n 44     const blob = new Blob([csv], { type: 'text/csv;charset=utf-8;' })\n 45     const url  = URL.createObjectURL(blob)\n 46     const link = document.createElement('a')\n 47     link.href = url; link.download = filename; link.click()\n 48     URL.revokeObjectURL(url)\n 49   }\n 50   \n 51   function generateFilename(): string {\n 52     return `zuno-report-${new Date().toISOString().slice(0, 10)}.csv`\n 53   }\n\n(developer reads through the refactored file -- triggerDownload is now a\n shared helper used by both exportToCsv and exportToCsvStreaming. Clean.)\n\n[16:15:55]\nVS Code — Terminal  (Claude Code — add one final improvement: progress callback)\n\n> Small improvement to exportToCsvStreaming: add an optional onProgress callback\n  parameter. After each chunk is processed, call onProgress(processedRows, totalRows).\n  This lets the UI show a progress bar for very large exports.\n  onProgress is optional (default: undefined) and should not be called if not provided.\n\n● Claude is thinking...\n\n  ✎ Editing src/utils/export.ts (line 25-41)\n  ─────────────────────────────────────────\n  export function exportToCsvStreaming(\n    data:        Record<string, unknown>[],\n    filename:    string = generateFilename(),\n    chunkSize:   number = 500,\n  + onProgress?: (processed: number, total: number) => void,\n  ): void {\n    if (data.length === 0) return\n    const formatted = data.map(row =>\n      Object.fromEntries(Object.entries(row).map(([k, v]) => [k, formatValue(v)]))\n    )\n    const chunks: string[] = []\n    for (let i = 0; i < formatted.length; i += chunkSize) {\n      const chunk = formatted.slice(i, i + chunkSize)\n      chunks.push(Papa.unparse(chunk, { header: i === 0 }))\n  +     onProgress?.(Math.min(i + chunkSize, formatted.length), formatted.length)\n    }\n    const csv = chunks.join('\\n')\n    triggerDownload(csv, filename)\n  +   onProgress?.(formatted.length, formatted.length)  // 100% complete\n  }\n  ─────────────────────────────────────────\n  ✓ Wrote src/utils/export.ts  (+2 lines)\n\n  Done. The onProgress callback fires after each 500-row chunk, allowing\n  the UI to show a progress bar: onProgress(500, 10000) -> onProgress(1000, 10000) etc.\n\n[16:16:40]\nVS Code — tests/utils/export.test.ts  (adding onProgress test)\n(developer opens the test file to add coverage for the new parameter)\n\n  // existing tests ...\n\n  it('calls onProgress after each chunk', () => {\n    const progress: [number, number][] = []\n    const data = Array.from({ length: 1200 }, (_, i) => ({ id: i + 1, value: i * 2.5 }))\n    exportToCsvStreaming(data, 'test.csv', 500,\n      (processed, total) => progress.push([processed, total])\n    )\n    // 1200 rows / 500 chunk = 3 chunks (500, 1000, 1200) + final 100%\n    expect(progress).toEqual([\n      [500,  1200],\n      [1000, 1200],\n      [1200, 1200],  // last chunk\n      [1200, 1200],  // explicit 100%\n    ])\n  })\n\n[16:17:10]\nVS Code — Terminal\n\n$ npx tsc --noEmit\n  (exit 0)\n\n$ npm test -- --testPathPattern=export --verbose\n  PASS src/utils/export.test.ts\n    exportToCsv\n      ✓ generates correct CSV from array of objects  (12ms)\n      ✓ removes trailing .00 from integer values  (4ms)\n      ✓ formats Date objects as YYYY-MM-DD  (3ms)\n      ✓ handles empty data array (no-op)  (2ms)\n      ✓ generates filename with today date  (5ms)\n    exportToCsvStreaming\n      ✓ calls onProgress after each chunk  (7ms)\n  Tests: 6 passed  |  Time: 1.2s\n\n$ git add src/utils/export.ts tests/utils/export.test.ts\n$ git commit -m 'feat(reports): add onProgress callback to exportToCsvStreaming (PROJ-230)\n>\n> Enables progress bar UI for large CSV exports.\n> onProgress(processed, total) fires after each 500-row chunk\n> and once more at 100%% for completion.\n> Optional param -- backward compatible. 6/6 tests passing.'\n\n  [feat/proj-230-csv-export 9a8b7c6]  feat(reports): add onProgress callback\n  2 files changed, 14 insertions(+)\n\n$ git push\n  Pushed feat/proj-230-csv-export\n\n(developer: PROJ-230 is polished now:\n  - exportToCsv(): small datasets\n  - exportToCsvStreaming(): large datasets with 500-row chunking\n  - onProgress callback for progress bar UI\n  - formatValue: integer .00 stripping, Date ISO format\n  PR #95 ready to merge once Rachel and Alex approve.)\n(closes VS Code. Done for the day.)\n",
+      "audio_snippets": [],
+      "ground_truth": {
+        "task_key": "PROJ-230",
+        "session_type": "task",
+        "difficulty": "medium",
+        "reasoning": "VS Code session adding onProgress callback to exportToCsvStreaming. Developer reads the current export.ts (53 lines), adds optional onProgress parameter that fires after each 500-row chunk, adds a test covering the 3-chunk + final-100% pattern. Runs 6 tests (pass), commits, pushes. Final polishing commit for PROJ-230 before PR merge.",
+        "scoreable": true
+      },
+      "design_notes": "MEDIUM PROJ-230 — last implementation session of the day. Branch is feat/proj-230-csv-export, file is export.ts (papaparse, chunking, Blob URL). The onProgress callback is a clean extension of the streaming API. No PROJ-225 confusion possible (no React, no skeleton, no dashboard). Medium difficulty: the technique (callback pattern for progress reporting) is non-trivial but the ticket context is unambiguous. Completes the Dev B dataset at 35 sessions."
+    },
+    {
+      "id": 36,
+      "app_name": "Terminal",
+      "started_at": "2026-05-28T08:30:00+05:30",
+      "ended_at": null,
+      "duration_s": 280,
+      "category": "maintenance",
+      "confidence": 0.91,
+      "session_text_source": "ocr",
+      "window_titles": [
+        {
+          "window_name": "zsh — zuno-app — iTerm2",
+          "count": 4
+        }
+      ],
+      "session_text": "[08:30:00]\nTerminal — iTerm2\n  zsh -- zuno-app/\n\n[08:30:12]\n$ docker-compose ps\n  zuno-postgres    Up      0.0.0.0:5432->5432/tcp\n  zuno-redis       Up      0.0.0.0:6379->6379/tcp\n\n  (stale volumes from yesterday's migration run — cleaning before work)\n\n$ docker-compose down -v\n  Stopping zuno-postgres ... done\n  Stopping zuno-redis    ... done\n  Removing volume zuno-app_postgres_data\n  Removing volume zuno-app_redis_data\n\n[08:31:00]\n$ docker-compose up -d\n  Creating zuno-postgres ... done\n  Creating zuno-redis    ... done\n\n$ npx prisma migrate reset --force\n  Datasource: PostgreSQL \"zuno_development\" at localhost:5432\n  Applying migration `20260101000001_init`\n  Applying migration `20260115000002_add_webhook_targets`\n  Applying migration `20260201000003_add_auth_sessions`\n  Applying migration `20260310000004_add_reports`\n  Database reset successful\n\n$ npm run db:seed\n  Created 3 workspace records\n  Created 10 user records\n  Created 25 webhook_target records\n  Seeding complete.\n\n[08:32:30]\n$ npx tsc --noEmit\n  (exit 0)\n\n$ npm test -- --passWithNoTests --silent\n  Test Suites: 14 passed, 14 total\n  Tests:       87 passed, 87 total\n  Time: 6.4s\n\n(developer: all green. clean slate for the day)\n",
+      "audio_snippets": [],
+      "ground_truth": {
+        "task_key": "none",
+        "session_type": "untracked",
+        "difficulty": "untracked",
+        "reasoning": "Terminal session resetting the local dev environment: docker-compose down -v, fresh volumes, Prisma migrate reset, seed data, tsc + npm test. Pure infrastructure housekeeping. No ticket key mentioned anywhere. No source files modified.",
+        "scoreable": true
+      },
+      "design_notes": "EASY untracked — docker dev env reset at start of day. The migration names (add_webhook_targets, add_auth_sessions, add_reports) overlap with ticket domains (PROJ-201, PROJ-210, PROJ-230) but the session is infrastructure, not implementation. No PROJ-* reference in any command or output."
+    },
+    {
+      "id": 37,
+      "app_name": "Google Chrome",
+      "started_at": "2026-05-28T09:00:00+05:30",
+      "ended_at": null,
+      "duration_s": 780,
+      "category": "review",
+      "confidence": 0.88,
+      "session_text_source": "ocr",
+      "window_titles": [
+        {
+          "window_name": "PR #93: PROJ-210 frontend auth cookie middleware — zuno-app — GitHub · Google Chrome",
+          "count": 8
+        },
+        {
+          "window_name": "src/middleware/auth.ts · feat/proj-210-cookie-auth · GitHub",
+          "count": 3
+        }
+      ],
+      "session_text": "[09:00:00]\nGoogle Chrome\nTabs:\n  (1) Pull Request #93 · PROJ-210 frontend auth cookie middleware — GitHub  <- ACTIVE\n  (2) feat/proj-210-cookie-auth · zuno-app — GitHub\n\n[09:00:15]\nGitHub — Pull Request #93\nbase: main ← compare: feat/proj-210-cookie-auth\nOpened by: Alex Rodriguez\n\nPROJ-210 — Migrate auth from JWT to session cookies (Frontend)\n\nThis PR adds:\n  - Cookie-based session middleware in src/middleware/auth.ts\n  - Drops Authorization: Bearer header from the frontend\n  - Updates src/utils/session.ts: removeJwtFromHeaders(), setSessionCookie()\n  - 12 integration tests in tests/auth/session.test.ts\n\nCI: ✓ (12/12 tests passing, tsc clean)\nReviewers: Zoe Dev, Sarah Chen\n\n[09:02:00]\nGitHub — diff: src/middleware/auth.ts\n\n  -  const token = req.headers.authorization?.replace('Bearer ', '');\n  +  const sessionId = req.cookies['zuno_session_id'];\n  +  if (!sessionId) return res.status(401).json({ error: 'No session' });\n  +  const session = await sessionStore.get(sessionId);\n  +  if (!session || session.expiresAt < Date.now()) {\n  +    return res.status(401).json({ error: 'Session expired' });\n  +  }\n  +  req.user = session.user;\n  +  next();\n\n[09:05:00]\nGitHub — diff: src/utils/session.ts\n\n  + export function setSessionCookie(res: Response, sessionId: string): void {\n  +   res.cookie('zuno_session_id', sessionId, {\n  +     httpOnly: true,\n  +     secure: process.env.NODE_ENV === 'production',\n  +     sameSite: 'strict',\n  +     maxAge: 7 * 24 * 60 * 60 * 1000,\n  +   });\n  + }\n\n[09:09:00]\nGitHub — Add review comment (line 8, auth.ts)\n\nDeveloper types:\n  > @Alex — can we add a comment explaining why we check Date.now() instead of\n  > delegating expiry to Redis TTL? The intent is non-obvious to a future reader.\n(submits comment)\n\n[09:10:00]\nGitHub — Add review comment (line 4, session.ts)\n\nDeveloper types:\n  > Nit: should maxAge come from a config constant rather than inline arithmetic?\n  > Session duration might need to be configurable without a code change.\n(submits comment)\n\n[09:11:00]\nGitHub — Submit review\n  Review type: Request changes\n  Summary:\n    Two nit-level comments. Once Alex adds the dev-mode warning and addresses\n    these nits, this is ready to merge. Session middleware logic is solid.\n  (submits)\n\n[09:12:00]\nGitHub — PR #93\n  1 review requesting changes (Zoe Dev)\n  1 comment from Sarah Chen: 'LGTM on the middleware, waiting on Zoe nits'\n\n(developer closes GitHub)\n",
+      "audio_snippets": [],
+      "ground_truth": {
+        "task_key": "none",
+        "session_type": "overhead",
+        "difficulty": "overhead",
+        "reasoning": "Chrome session reviewing Alex Rodriguez's PR #93 for PROJ-210 on GitHub. Developer reads three diffs (auth.ts, session.ts, session.test.ts), leaves two 'request changes' comments, submits a review. No local code written — pure code review activity.",
+        "scoreable": true
+      },
+      "design_notes": "EASY overhead — GitHub PR review for PROJ-210 (pr-review-as-ticket-work). The PR is explicitly for PROJ-210 and contains realistic auth cookie diffs. Failure mode: classifier sees PROJ-210 + auth cookie code + session middleware and might classify as PROJ-210 task work. Discriminators: (1) PR diff layout, not an editor, (2) 'Opened by: Alex Rodriguez' — developer is the reviewer, (3) developer submits a review comment, doesn't commit or edit files."
+    },
+    {
+      "id": 38,
+      "app_name": "Zoom",
+      "started_at": "2026-05-28T10:30:00+05:30",
+      "ended_at": null,
+      "duration_s": 1680,
+      "category": "communication",
+      "confidence": 0.92,
+      "session_text_source": "ocr",
+      "window_titles": [
+        {
+          "window_name": "Zoom Meeting — PROJ-225 planning",
+          "count": 12
+        },
+        {
+          "window_name": "Zoom — Screen share: Sarah Chen",
+          "count": 5
+        }
+      ],
+      "session_text": "[10:30:00]\nZoom — Video Call\nParticipants: Sarah Chen (host), Zoe Dev, Priya Kapoor\nMeeting title: PROJ-225 planning — dashboard lazy loading\n\n[10:30:20]\nSarah Chen (screen sharing — Miro board)\n\nSarah's Miro: 'Dashboard performance — PROJ-225'\n  Component tree (current):\n    DashboardPage\n      FocusDonut        (82 KB — lazy candidate)\n      BarChart          (119 KB — lazy candidate)\n      SessionTimeline   (67 KB — lazy candidate)\n      AppTable          (33 KB — borderline)\n\n  Sarah: 'Do we React.lazy() all four, or just the two charts?\n          AppTable might be needed above the fold.'\n\n[10:34:00]\nZoom — Zoe speaking (video on)\n\nZoe: 'I'd lazy all four and use a consistent skeleton pattern.\n      The AppTable re-renders on every URL change — lazy gives\n      us natural debouncing. We show a table skeleton immediately.'\n\nPriya: 'Suspense boundary strategy? One root or per-component?'\n\nZoe: 'Per-component — otherwise a slow BarChart blocks the whole page.\n      Each chart gets its own <Suspense fallback={<ChartSkeleton />}>.'\n\n[10:38:00]\nSarah (screen share — Miro, adding decisions)\n\n  Decision: React.lazy() all 4 heavy components\n  Boundary: per-component Suspense\n  Fallback: ChartSkeleton / TableSkeleton matching real dimensions\n  ErrorBoundary: wrap each Suspense\n\n[10:42:00]\nPriya speaking:\n\nPriya: 'How do we handle data-testid for Playwright? The lazy load\n        breaks existing selectors because the skeleton renders first.'\n\nZoe: 'Add data-testid to both skeleton AND real component with the same\n      value. Playwright waits for the real component to appear.'\n\nPriya: 'Got it. I will update the Playwright selectors in the E2E suite.'\n\n[10:48:00]\nSarah (screen share — action items)\n\n  Action items from PROJ-225 planning call:\n  1. Zoe: implement React.lazy for BarChart + SessionTimeline\n  2. Priya: update Playwright E2E selectors for skeleton-aware testing\n  3. Sarah: update PROJ-225 acceptance criteria to include ErrorBoundary\n  4. All: PR #94 review by EOD tomorrow\n\n[10:58:00]\nZoom — Meeting ends\n  Duration: 28 minutes  |  Participants: 3\n\n(developer switches to VS Code after the call)\n",
+      "audio_snippets": [],
+      "ground_truth": {
+        "task_key": "none",
+        "session_type": "overhead",
+        "difficulty": "overhead",
+        "reasoning": "Zoom planning call with Sarah and Priya about PROJ-225 dashboard lazy loading. Developer participates verbally — discusses React.lazy strategy, Suspense boundary placement, data-testid for Playwright. No code written, no files modified. Meeting produces action items only.",
+        "scoreable": true
+      },
+      "design_notes": "MEDIUM overhead — Zoom planning call (meeting-as-ticket-work). The call is entirely focused on PROJ-225 implementation details with specific technical decisions (per-component Suspense, ChartSkeleton, ErrorBoundary, Playwright selectors). Failure mode: classifier sees PROJ-225 + React.lazy + ErrorBoundary + FCP and might classify as PROJ-225 task work. Discriminators: (1) Zoom app, (2) session ends with 'action items', (3) Priya says 'I will update the Playwright selectors' — work is planned, not done."
+    },
+    {
+      "id": 39,
+      "app_name": "Slack",
+      "started_at": "2026-05-28T11:30:00+05:30",
+      "ended_at": null,
+      "duration_s": 1140,
+      "category": "communication",
+      "confidence": 0.89,
+      "session_text_source": "ocr",
+      "window_titles": [
+        {
+          "window_name": "Slack — #eng-platform",
+          "count": 8
+        },
+        {
+          "window_name": "Slack — Thread: PROJ-201 idempotency",
+          "count": 5
+        }
+      ],
+      "session_text": "[11:30:00]\nSlack — Zuno Engineering\nChannel: #eng-platform  <- ACTIVE\n\nToday 11:28  Sarah Chen\n  quick question on PROJ-201 idempotency — we're using a hash of\n  (targetUrl + payload + attempt_number). but attempt_number means\n  re-queued jobs get a new key and don't deduplicate against prior attempts.\n  should we drop attempt_number?\n\nToday 11:29  Alex Rodriguez → Thread\n  dropping attempt_number makes the key stable across retries. key should be:\n  sha256(targetUrl + payload_canonical_json)\n\nToday 11:30  Zoe Dev (opens thread)\n\n[11:31:00]\nSlack — Thread: 'PROJ-201 idempotency key strategy'\n\nDeveloper typing in thread:\n\nToday 11:31  Zoe Dev\n  agree with Alex — here is what I would do for the canonical JSON part:\n\n  ```ts\n  function buildIdempotencyKey(targetUrl: string, payload: unknown): string {\n    const canonical = JSON.stringify(\n      payload, Object.keys(payload as object).sort()\n    )\n    const input = `${targetUrl}|${canonical}`\n    return crypto.createHash('sha256').update(input).digest('hex')\n  }\n  ```\n\n  key things:\n  - sorted keys before stringify so field order doesn't matter\n  - pipe-delimiter prevents ambiguity if url ends in json chars\n  - add UNIQUE constraint on webhook_deliveries — postgres rejects\n    duplicate inserts, belt-and-suspenders against double-send\n\n[11:43:00]\nSlack — Thread (continuing)\n\nToday 11:35  Sarah Chen\n  love the sorted-keys approach. does the key need to survive a payload\n  schema change? if we add a field, existing keys are stable but new\n  deliveries get different keys. is that okay?\n\nToday 11:37  Alex Rodriguez\n  yes that is fine — old deliveries are already completed. key only needs\n  to be stable within one delivery lifecycle (enqueue -> retry -> done).\n\nToday 11:40  Zoe Dev\n  exactly. and the UNIQUE constraint means even if a bug enqueues the same\n  delivery twice, postgres rejects the duplicate insert. we catch the\n  UniqueViolation in the retry handler and skip — no double-send.\n\nToday 11:43  Sarah Chen\n  perfect. Alex can you add this to the PROJ-201 PR review thread?\n  I will add the postgres constraint to the migration.\n\nToday 11:44  Zoe Dev\n  sounds good. lmk when the migration is up and I'll review.\n\n[11:49:00]\n(developer closes Slack)\n",
+      "audio_snippets": [],
+      "ground_truth": {
+        "task_key": "none",
+        "session_type": "overhead",
+        "difficulty": "overhead",
+        "reasoning": "Slack thread in #eng-platform about PROJ-201 idempotency key strategy. Developer writes a TypeScript function in Slack and recommends a postgres UNIQUE constraint. No local files modified, no commits made — the discussion is design review in chat.",
+        "scoreable": true
+      },
+      "design_notes": "HARD overhead — Slack technical thread with pasted TypeScript code (chat-mention-as-work, hard variant). The developer pastes a real buildIdempotencyKey function with crypto.createHash, sorted keys, UNIQUE constraint. Specific to PROJ-201 (webhook_deliveries, retry handler). Failure mode: classifier sees TypeScript + PROJ-201 + webhook + postgres and might classify as PROJ-201 task work. Discriminators: (1) Slack app, (2) code is in backtick blocks in a chat message, (3) Sarah says 'Alex can you add this to the PR review thread' — the code is a design proposal, not a committed change."
+    },
+    {
+      "id": 40,
+      "app_name": "Google Chrome",
+      "started_at": "2026-05-28T14:00:00+05:30",
+      "ended_at": null,
+      "duration_s": 1020,
+      "category": "planning",
+      "confidence": 0.93,
+      "session_text_source": "ocr",
+      "window_titles": [
+        {
+          "window_name": "PROJ-225 — Zuno — Linear · Google Chrome",
+          "count": 7
+        },
+        {
+          "window_name": "Sprint board — Zuno — Linear · Google Chrome",
+          "count": 4
+        }
+      ],
+      "session_text": "[14:00:00]\nGoogle Chrome\nTabs:\n  (1) PROJ-225 — Zuno — Linear  <- ACTIVE\n  (2) Sprint board — Zuno — Linear\n\n[14:00:15]\nLinear — PROJ-225\n  Dashboard performance: lazy-load heavy chart components\n  Status: In Progress → In Review  (developer changes status)\n  Assignee: Zoe Dev  |  Priority: P1  |  Estimate: 8 pts\n  Labels: frontend, performance, react\n\n  Subtasks:\n    [x] Implement React.lazy for FocusDonut\n    [x] Add ChartSkeleton component\n    [x] Per-component Suspense boundaries\n    [ ] React.lazy for BarChart             (in progress)\n    [ ] React.lazy for SessionTimeline      (in progress)\n    [ ] ErrorBoundary wrapper for each chart\n    [ ] Playwright E2E selector updates     (Priya)\n\n  (developer updates BarChart + SessionTimeline subtasks to 'In Progress')\n\n[14:04:00]\nLinear — PROJ-225 (editing acceptance criteria)\n\n  Acceptance criteria (developer adds):\n  - [ ] FCP < 200ms on 3G Fast (Lighthouse)\n  - [ ] Each chart renders skeleton within 50ms of page load\n  - [ ] No FOUC during lazy load\n  - [ ] ErrorBoundary: each chart shows ChartErrorState on throw\n  - [ ] Playwright: all chart selectors use data-testid, not CSS class\n  - [ ] PR #94 approved by Sarah + Priya before merge\n\n  (developer saves updated acceptance criteria)\n\n[14:08:00]\nLinear — Sprint board\n\n  Sprint: May Sprint 2026  (Day 3 of 14)\n  Capacity: 80 pts  |  Done: 31  |  In Review: 29  |  In Progress: 20\n  Velocity: on track (target 6 pts/day, actual 10.3 pts/day)\n\n  In Review:\n    PROJ-225 (8 pts) — Zoe\n    PROJ-230 (5 pts) — Zoe\n    PROJ-210 backend (13 pts) — Zoe\n    PROJ-210 frontend (3 pts) — Alex\n    PROJ-215 (2 pts) — Zoe\n\n[14:12:00]\nLinear — PROJ-225 (adding planning comment)\n\n  Developer types:\n    2026-05-28 14:12 — Planning note\n    FocusDonut lazy load done + skeleton working. BarChart + SessionTimeline\n    still need React.lazy wrap and dynamic import (PR #94 has skeleton stubs).\n    ErrorBoundary pass is last step before merge. Priya handling Playwright selectors.\n    ETA: PR #94 ready for final review tomorrow morning.\n\n  (saves comment, closes Linear)\n",
+      "audio_snippets": [],
+      "ground_truth": {
+        "task_key": "none",
+        "session_type": "overhead",
+        "difficulty": "overhead",
+        "reasoning": "Chrome session in Linear updating PROJ-225 status to In Review, checking off subtasks, adding acceptance criteria, checking sprint burndown, and adding a planning comment. All ticket management — no code written, no files edited.",
+        "scoreable": true
+      },
+      "design_notes": "HARD overhead — Linear sprint board update for PROJ-225 (ticket-admin-as-task-work). Developer adds detailed acceptance criteria (FCP <200ms, skeleton timing, ErrorBoundary, Playwright selectors) and a planning comment referencing specific files (PR #94, FocusDonut, BarChart, lazy()). Failure mode: classifier might see PROJ-225 + React.lazy + ErrorBoundary + FCP metrics and conclude this is implementation. Discriminators: (1) Google Chrome with Linear layout, (2) status dropdowns and subtask checkboxes in the OCR, (3) planning comment says 'ETA tomorrow morning' — the work is not happening now."
+    },
+    {
+      "id": 41,
+      "app_name": "Google Chrome",
+      "started_at": "2026-05-28T15:30:00+05:30",
+      "ended_at": null,
+      "duration_s": 1380,
+      "category": "maintenance",
+      "confidence": 0.87,
+      "session_text_source": "ocr",
+      "window_titles": [
+        {
+          "window_name": "Datadog — APM — notification-queue-worker · Google Chrome",
+          "count": 6
+        },
+        {
+          "window_name": "Datadog — Logs — notification-queue-worker · Google Chrome",
+          "count": 4
+        },
+        {
+          "window_name": "zsh — zuno-app/services/notification-queue — iTerm2",
+          "count": 3
+        }
+      ],
+      "session_text": "[15:30:00]\nGoogle Chrome — Datadog APM\n  Service: notification-queue-worker\n  Environment: production  |  Time range: Last 2h\n\n  Memory (RSS):\n    14:00: 142 MB\n    15:00: 241 MB  <- sharp climb\n    15:20: 310 MB  <- P99 alert fired (threshold 300 MB)\n    15:30: 318 MB (current)\n\n  Alert: [PROD] notification-queue-worker memory > 300MB  (fired 15:20)\n  (PagerDuty: Zoe Dev on-call, non-critical, investigate before EOD)\n\n[15:33:00]\nDatadog — Logs\n  Service: notification-queue-worker  |  Filter: level:warn OR level:error\n\n  15:04:12  WARN  MaxListenersExceededWarning: EventEmitter 11 listeners on 'message'\n  15:08:45  WARN  MaxListenersExceededWarning: 13 listeners on 'message'\n  15:28:33  WARN  MaxListenersExceededWarning: 20 listeners on 'message'\n\n  (developer: listener leak — growing every 4 min)\n\n[15:37:00]\nTerminal — zuno-app/services/notification-queue\n\n$ git log --oneline -3\n  a3f7c12  feat: add retry with exponential backoff to queue-listener\n  9b2e445  chore: bump @aws-sdk/client-sqs 3.550 -> 3.554\n  7d1cc8f  feat: initial notification queue worker (SQS long-polling)\n\n$ git show a3f7c12 --stat\n  services/notification-queue/src/queue-listener.ts  |  28 +\n\n$ git diff HEAD~1 HEAD -- src/queue-listener.ts | grep 'on('\n  +  this.sqsClient.on('error', this.handleError.bind(this))\n  +  this.sqsClient.on('error', this.handleError.bind(this))  // retry loop\n\n  (developer: retry loop re-registers error handler on every iteration\n   without removing old one — listener accumulates)\n\n[15:42:00]\nTerminal\n\n$ cat > /tmp/oom-notes.md << 'EOF'\n# notification-queue-worker OOM — 2026-05-28\nRoot cause: queue-listener.ts re-registers sqsClient.on('error', handler)\ninside retry loop (commit a3f7c12). Each retry adds a listener without\nremoving old one. After 90min, MaxListenersExceededWarning, RSS +5MB/listener.\nFix: register error handler once at constructor time.\nNo ticket for this — notification-queue-worker is an internal canary service.\nEOF\n\n[15:50:00]\nGoogle Chrome — Linear (new tab)\n\nDeveloper creates issue:\n  Title: Fix event listener leak in notification-queue-worker retry loop\n  Labels: backend, bug, memory\n  Estimate: 2 pts\n  (creates PROJ-255)\n\n(developer: filed PROJ-255. will fix tomorrow. closing Datadog.)\n",
+      "audio_snippets": [],
+      "ground_truth": {
+        "task_key": "none",
+        "session_type": "untracked",
+        "difficulty": "untracked",
+        "reasoning": "Developer investigates a production OOM alert for notification-queue-worker via Datadog. Identifies event listener leak in commit a3f7c12 and files a new ticket PROJ-255. The service is unreleased and PROJ-255 is not in the open ticket list — no candidate matches.",
+        "scoreable": true
+      },
+      "design_notes": "MEDIUM untracked — production OOM debugging for an un-ticketed service. notification-queue-worker is adjacent to PROJ-242 (Slack notifications for webhook failures) and PROJ-201 (webhook retry) but is a separate internal service. Developer files PROJ-255 at the end — a new ticket not in the candidate list. Failure mode: classifier might assign PROJ-201 (webhook) or PROJ-242 (notification) due to domain overlap. Discriminators: (1) service is notification-queue-worker, not webhook-retry or Slack integration, (2) PROJ-255 is created at the end and is NOT in the candidate list, (3) no code committed — developer only investigates."
+    },
+    {
+      "id": 42,
+      "app_name": "Code",
+      "started_at": "2026-05-28T16:30:00+05:30",
+      "ended_at": null,
+      "duration_s": 1680,
+      "category": "coding",
+      "confidence": 0.95,
+      "session_text_source": "ocr",
+      "window_titles": [
+        {
+          "window_name": "tests/integration/auth-v2.test.ts — auth-service-v2 — Visual Studio Code",
+          "count": 6
+        },
+        {
+          "window_name": "src/middleware/session.ts — auth-service-v2 — Visual Studio Code",
+          "count": 4
+        },
+        {
+          "window_name": "Terminal — zsh — auth-service-v2 — iTerm2",
+          "count": 3
+        }
+      ],
+      "session_text": "[16:30:00]\nVisual Studio Code\nWorkspace: auth-service-v2  (separate repo, ~/projects/auth-service-v2)\nBranch: main\nActive tab: tests/integration/auth-v2.test.ts  <- ACTIVE\n\n[16:30:15]\nVS Code — tests/integration/auth-v2.test.ts\n\n   1   // auth-service-v2 — stateless session middleware prototype\n   2   import { createSessionMiddleware } from '../src/middleware/session'\n   3   import { MemoryStore } from '../src/stores/memory-store'\n   4   import supertest from 'supertest'\n   5   import express from 'express'\n   6\n   7   describe('session middleware', () => {\n   8     let app: express.Express\n   9     let store: MemoryStore\n  10\n  11     beforeEach(() => {\n  12       store = new MemoryStore({ ttl: 3600 })\n  13       app = express()\n  14       app.use(createSessionMiddleware({ store, cookieName: 'sid', secure: false }))\n  15       app.get('/me', (req, res) => res.json({ user: (req as any).session?.user ?? null }))\n  16     })\n  17\n  18     it('returns null user when no cookie present', async () => {\n  19       const res = await supertest(app).get('/me')\n  20       expect(res.body.user).toBeNull()\n  21     })\n  22\n  23     it('returns user when valid session cookie present', async () => {\n  24       const sessionId = await store.create({ user: { id: 'u1', email: 'zoe@zuno.io' } })\n  25       const res = await supertest(app).get('/me').set('Cookie', `sid=${sessionId}`)\n  26       expect(res.body.user.email).toBe('zoe@zuno.io')\n  27     })\n  28\n  29     it('returns null user when session expired', async () => {\n  30       const store2 = new MemoryStore({ ttl: -1 })\n  31       const sessionId = await store2.create({ user: { id: 'u1', email: 'zoe@zuno.io' } })\n  32       const res = await supertest(expiredApp).get('/me').set('Cookie', `sid=${sessionId}`)\n  33       expect(res.body.user).toBeNull()\n  34     })\n  35   })\n\n[16:35:00]\nVS Code — src/middleware/session.ts\n\n   1   // auth-service-v2 — session middleware\n   2   import type { Request, Response, NextFunction, RequestHandler } from 'express'\n   3\n   4   export interface SessionStore {\n   5     get(id: string): Promise<SessionData | null>\n   6     create(data: SessionData): Promise<string>\n   7     destroy(id: string): Promise<void>\n   8   }\n   9\n  10   export function createSessionMiddleware(\n  11     opts: { store: SessionStore; cookieName: string; secure: boolean }\n  12   ): RequestHandler {\n  13     return async (req, res, next) => {\n  14       const cookieHeader = req.headers.cookie ?? ''\n  15       const cookies = Object.fromEntries(\n  16         cookieHeader.split(';').map(c => c.trim().split('='))\n  17       )\n  18       const sessionId = cookies[opts.cookieName]\n  19       if (!sessionId) { next(); return }\n  20       const session = await opts.store.get(sessionId)\n  21       if (session) (req as any).session = session\n  22       next()\n  23     }\n  24   }\n\n[16:45:00]\nVS Code — Terminal\n\n$ npm test\n  PASS tests/integration/auth-v2.test.ts\n    session middleware\n      v returns null user when no cookie present  (18ms)\n      v returns user when valid session cookie present  (12ms)\n      v returns null user when session expired  (8ms)\n  Tests: 3 passed  |  Time: 1.4s\n\n$ npx tsc --noEmit\n  (exit 0)\n\n$ git commit -am 'feat: session middleware + MemoryStore integration tests'\n  [main 3a4d917] feat: session middleware + MemoryStore integration tests\n  2 files changed, 66 insertions(+)\n\n[16:58:00]\nVS Code — src/stores/memory-store.ts\n  (developer starts stubbing RedisStore interface)\n  (session ends — switches to Slack)\n",
+      "audio_snippets": [],
+      "ground_truth": {
+        "task_key": "none",
+        "session_type": "untracked",
+        "difficulty": "untracked",
+        "reasoning": "VS Code session in a separate repository (auth-service-v2) writing session middleware and MemoryStore integration tests. Developer commits 2 files to auth-service-v2 main branch. This is a separate un-ticketed prototype — not part of zuno-app and not linked to any open ticket.",
+        "scoreable": true
+      },
+      "design_notes": "HARD untracked — real coding session in an unreleased separate repo. Failure mode: session middleware + cookie-based auth + SessionStore are identical terminology to PROJ-210 (migrate auth from JWT to session cookies in zuno-app). A classifier might assign PROJ-210. Discriminators: (1) workspace is auth-service-v2 (not zuno-app) visible in window title and imports, (2) branch is main (not feat/proj-210-cookie-auth), (3) MemoryStore with ttl param is different from PROJ-210's Redis session store, (4) no reference to zuno-app files like src/utils/session.ts or the existing auth.ts middleware."
+    }
+  ]
+}