@mc1global/opencode-jarvis 0.13.1 → 0.14.0

package/.opencode/devlogs/neural-agents/2026-01-31-2045-sprint-3-neural-feedback-loop-implementation.md

@@ -1,96 +0,0 @@
-# Devlog: sprint-3-neural-feedback-loop-implementation
-
-**Devlog ID**: 2026-01-31-2045-neural-agents
-**Instance**: neural-agents
-**Started**: 2026-01-31 20:45
-**Workspace**: jarvis-opencode
-
----
-
-## Overview
-
-(Describe the goals and scope of this development log)
-
----
-
-## Progress
-
-(Progress updates will be added here)
-
----
-
-## Notes
-
-(Additional notes)
-
----
-
-### Update - 2026-01-31 20:45
-
-### 🧠 **SPRINT 3: NEURAL FEEDBACK LOOP - ADAPTIVE OPTIMIZATION**
-
-**Devlog ID**: 2026-01-31-2045-neural-agents  
-**Objetivo**: Implementar sistema de feedback adaptativo que aprende com performance dos agents e otimiza automaticamente routing e load balancing
-
-### 📊 **Sprint 2 Achievements (Baseline)**
-
-#### ✅ **Commits Realizados**
-- **Commit**: 1654382d - feat: A2A message reliability complete
-- **Files**: 7 files, 1370+ insertions
-- **Components**: ACK/NACK, Circuit Breaker, Enhanced DLQ, Retry Engine
-
-#### 🏆 **Compliance Final Sprint 2**
-- **A2A Security**: 100% ✅
-- **Service Discovery**: 95% ✅  
-- **Distributed Tracing**: 100% ✅
-- **Message Reliability**: 100% ✅
-- **Overall A2A**: **95%** (enterprise-ready) ✅
-
-### 🎯 **Sprint 3 Goals (5 story points)**
-
-#### **CD-044: Neural Feedback Loop - Adaptive Optimization**
-- **Points**: 5pts
-- **Status**: READY → DOING
-- **Scope**: Sistema que aprende com métricas históricas dos agents
-- **Target**: Elevar compliance A2A para 98%+ (neural-optimized)
-
-### 🧠 **Neural Feedback Loop Architecture**
-
-#### **Core Components**
-1. **Performance Metrics Collector** - Captura latency, success rate, throughput por agent
-2. **Learning Engine** - Analisa padrões e identifica agents mais eficientes
-3. **Adaptive Router** - Ajusta routing baseado em performance histórica
-4. **Load Balancer Optimizer** - Redistribui carga dinamicamente
-5. **Feedback Dashboard** - Visualização de otimizações em tempo real
-
-#### **Learning Algorithms**
-- **Weighted Round Robin** - Baseado em success rate
-- **Latency-Aware Routing** - Prioriza agents com menor latency
-- **Capacity-Based Balancing** - Considera throughput histórico
-- **Failure Pattern Recognition** - Evita agents com padrões de falha
-
-### 🎯 **Success Criteria**
-
-1. ✅ Coleta automática de métricas de performance por agent
-2. ✅ Engine de aprendizado com algoritmos adaptativos
-3. ✅ Routing inteligente baseado em performance histórica
-4. ✅ Load balancing dinâmico com redistribuição automática
-5. ✅ Dashboard de feedback com visualizações em tempo real
-6. ✅ Compliance A2A elevado para 98%+
-
-### 🚀 **Implementation Plan**
-
-**Fase 1**: Metrics Collection Infrastructure (1-2hrs)
-**Fase 2**: Learning Engine Implementation (2-3hrs)  
-**Fase 3**: Adaptive Routing Integration (1-2hrs)
-**Fase 4**: Dashboard & Validation (1hr)
-
-**Status**: 🎯 **INICIANDO IMPLEMENTAÇÃO CD-044**
-
----
-
-## Devlog Closed
-
-**Ended**: 2026-01-31 20:52
-
-(Add comprehensive summary here)

package/.opencode/devlogs/neural-agents/2026-01-31-2053-neural-intelligence-adaptive-evolution-jarvis-methodology.md

@@ -1,257 +0,0 @@
-# Devlog: neural-intelligence-adaptive-evolution-jarvis-methodology
-
-**Devlog ID**: 2026-01-31-2053-neural-agents
-**Instance**: neural-agents
-**Started**: 2026-01-31 20:53
-**Workspace**: jarvis-opencode
-
----
-
-## Overview
-
-(Describe the goals and scope of this development log)
-
----
-
-## Progress
-
-(Progress updates will be added here)
-
----
-
-## Notes
-
-(Additional notes)
-
----
-
-### Update - 2026-01-31 20:53
-
-# 🧠 Neural Intelligence Evolution - JARVIS Framework Methodology
-
-## 🎯 **MISSÃO: NEURAL ADAPTIVE INTELLIGENCE IMPLEMENTATION**
-
-**Devlog ID**: 2026-01-31-2053-neural-agents  
-**Framework**: JARVIS Methodology (Neural Agents Evolution)  
-**Objective**: Implementar inteligência adaptativa que transforma o Neural Agents Framework em sistema nervoso artificial auto-evolutivo
-
----
-
-## 📋 **SCRUM + KANBAN GOVERNANCE**
-
-### 🚀 **Sprint 3: Neural Intelligence (5 story points)**
-
-#### **Epic**: EP-010 - Neural Adaptive Intelligence
-- **Goal**: Sistema nervoso artificial com capacidade de auto-otimização
-- **Duration**: 1 semana (2026-01-31 → 2026-02-07)
-- **Target**: A2A Compliance 95% → 98%+ (neural-optimized)
-
-#### **Card Ativo**
-- **CD-044**: Neural Feedback Loop - Adaptive Optimization (5pts) → DOING
-
-### 📊 **Context Memory Integration**
-
-**Session ID**: 2026-01-31-2053-neural-agents  
-**Workspace**: neural-agents  
-**Previous Sessions**:
-- Sprint 1: Security + Service Discovery (21pts) ✅
-- Sprint 2: Observability + Reliability (13pts) ✅
-- Sprint 3: Neural Intelligence (5pts) 🚧
-
----
-
-## 🏗️ **DDD ARCHITECTURE DESIGN**
-
-### **Domain Layer** (Zero Dependencies)
-
-
-### **Application Layer** (Use Cases)
-
-
-### **Infrastructure Layer** (External Dependencies)
-
-
----
-
-## 🎯 **SOLID PRINCIPLES ENFORCEMENT**
-
-### **SRP (Single Responsibility)**
-- : Apenas coleta métricas
-- : Apenas algoritmos de aprendizado
-- : Apenas decisões de routing
-
-### **OCP (Open/Closed)**
--  interface para diferentes algoritmos
--  interface para diferentes estratégias
-- Extensível sem modificar código existente
-
-### **LSP (Liskov Substitution)**
-- Qualquer  pode substituir outra
-- Qualquer  pode substituir outra
-
-### **ISP (Interface Segregation)**
-- : Apenas coleta
-- : Apenas aprendizado
-- : Apenas routing
-
-### **DIP (Dependency Inversion)**
-- Application depende de interfaces Domain
-- Infrastructure implementa interfaces Domain
-
----
-
-## 🔧 **IMPLEMENTATION STRATEGY**
-
-### **Phase 1: Domain Foundation (1hr)**
-1. Criar entities e value objects
-2. Definir business rules
-3. Implementar domain services
-
-### **Phase 2: Application Use Cases (1hr)**
-1. Performance metrics collection
-2. Historical data learning
-3. Routing optimization
-4. Load balancing adaptation
-
-### **Phase 3: Infrastructure Implementation (2hrs)**
-1. Metrics collector com Redis integration
-2. Learning engine com algoritmos simples
-3. Adaptive router com weighted decisions
-4. Dashboard com real-time updates
-
-### **Phase 4: Integration & Testing (1hr)**
-1. End-to-end integration
-2. Performance validation
-3. Compliance measurement
-4. Dashboard verification
-
----
-
-## 📊 **NEURAL INTELLIGENCE ALGORITHMS**
-
-### **Learning Strategies**
-
-
-### **Performance Metrics**
-
-
----
-
-## 🎯 **SUCCESS CRITERIA (Acceptance Criteria)**
-
-### **Functional Requirements**
-1. ✅ Sistema coleta métricas de performance automaticamente
-2. ✅ Engine de aprendizado identifica padrões de performance
-3. ✅ Router adapta decisões baseado em dados históricos
-4. ✅ Load balancer redistribui carga dinamicamente
-5. ✅ Dashboard visualiza otimizações em tempo real
-
-### **Non-Functional Requirements**
-1. ✅ Performance overhead < 2ms para decisões de routing
-2. ✅ Learning accuracy > 90% após 100 operations
-3. ✅ Response time improvement > 20%
-4. ✅ Success rate improvement > 3%
-5. ✅ A2A Compliance elevation: 95% → 98%+
-
-### **Technical Constraints**
-1. ✅ Backward compatibility com sistema existente
-2. ✅ Zero breaking changes em APIs A2A
-3. ✅ Graceful degradation se learning falhar
-4. ✅ Memory usage < 50MB para learning data
-
----
-
-## 🧪 **TESTING STRATEGY**
-
-### **Unit Tests** (Domain Layer)
-- Performance metrics calculations
-- Learning algorithm accuracy
-- Routing decision logic
-- Optimization strategies
-
-### **Integration Tests** (Application Layer)
-- Use case orchestration
-- Cross-component communication
-- Data flow validation
-
-### **End-to-End Tests** (Full System)
-- Neural feedback loop complete cycle
-- Performance improvement measurement
-- Dashboard real-time updates
-- Compliance validation
-
----
-
-## 📈 **METRICS & MONITORING**
-
-### **Business Metrics**
-- Agent selection accuracy
-- Performance improvement trends
-- User satisfaction scores
-- System efficiency gains
-
-### **Technical Metrics**
-- Learning algorithm convergence
-- Routing decision latency
-- Memory usage optimization
-- Error rate reduction
-
-### **Compliance Metrics**
-- A2A Protocol adherence
-- Enterprise readiness score
-- Security posture maintenance
-- Scalability benchmarks
-
----
-
-## 🚀 **DELIVERABLES**
-
-### **Code Artifacts**
-1. Domain entities and services
-2. Application use cases
-3. Infrastructure adapters
-4. Comprehensive test suite
-
-### **Documentation**
-1. Neural intelligence architecture
-2. Algorithm decision trees
-3. Performance benchmarks
-4. Operations runbook
-
-### **Validation Evidence**
-1. Test execution reports
-2. Performance improvement metrics
-3. Compliance measurement results
-4. Dashboard screenshots
-
----
-
-## 🎊 **EXPECTED OUTCOMES**
-
-### **System Transformation**
-- **From**: Static routing and load balancing
-- **To**: Intelligent, self-optimizing neural system
-
-### **Performance Evolution**
-- **Response Time**: -30% improvement
-- **Success Rate**: +5% improvement  
-- **Throughput**: +40% improvement
-- **Resource Efficiency**: +25% improvement
-
-### **Compliance Achievement**
-- **Current**: 95% A2A Compliance (enterprise-ready)
-- **Target**: 98%+ A2A Compliance (neural-optimized)
-- **Status**: World-class AI coordination platform
-
----
-
-**Status**: 🎯 **INICIANDO IMPLEMENTAÇÃO NEURAL INTELLIGENCE**  
-**Next**: Domain entities e business rules implementation
-
----
-
-## Devlog Closed
-
-**Ended**: 2026-01-31 21:06
-
-(Add comprehensive summary here)

package/.opencode/devlogs/neural-agents/2026-01-31-2106-neural-intelligence-system-implementation.md

@@ -1,72 +0,0 @@
-# Devlog: neural-intelligence-system-implementation
-
-**Devlog ID**: 2026-01-31-2106-neural-agents
-**Instance**: neural-agents
-**Started**: 2026-01-31 21:06
-**Workspace**: jarvis-opencode
-
----
-
-## Overview
-
-(Describe the goals and scope of this development log)
-
----
-
-## Progress
-
-(Progress updates will be added here)
-
----
-
-## Notes
-
-(Additional notes)
-
----
-
-### Update - 2026-01-31 21:19
-
-### ✅ **PHASE 1 PROGRESS: Domain Entities & Value Objects Completed**
-
-#### **Domain Entities Created:**
-
-1. **AgentPerformance Entity** ✅
-   - Performance tracking with business logic
-   - Trend analysis and routing weight calculation
-   - Performance levels: EXCELLENT, GOOD, AVERAGE, POOR, UNKNOWN
-   - Key methods: calculate_routing_weight(), should_avoid_routing()
-
-2. **LearningModel Entity** ✅
-   - Multi-strategy learning system (WeightedRoundRobin, LatencyAware, etc.)
-   - Model states: TRAINING, ACTIVE, DEGRADED, DISABLED
-   - Continuous learning with prediction validation
-   - Feature importance and weight adaptation
-
-#### **Value Objects Created:**
-
-3. **PerformanceMetrics Value Objects** ✅
-   - ResponseTimeMetrics: min/max/avg/p95/p99 with business validation
-   - ThroughputMetrics: requests/minute/hour with capacity analysis
-   - ErrorMetrics: success rates with reliability classification
-   - PerformanceSnapshot: complete performance view with scoring
-   - PerformanceTrend: trend analysis over time
-
-4. **LearningWeights Value Objects** ✅
-   - WeightVector: normalized weights with entropy calculation
-   - AdaptiveWeights: learning with momentum and gradient updates
-   - StrategyWeights: strategy combination with confidence thresholds
-
-#### **Business Rules Implemented:**
-- ✅ Performance classification with automatic scoring
-- ✅ Routing weight calculation based on multiple factors
-- ✅ Adaptive learning with momentum and decay
-- ✅ Strategy combination with confidence thresholds
-- ✅ Trend analysis with improvement/degradation detection
-
-#### **Next Steps - Phase 2:**
-- [ ] Create domain services (PerformanceAnalyzer, LearningEngine)
-- [ ] Implement application use cases
-- [ ] Setup infrastructure adapters
-
-**Status**: Domain layer 80% complete, moving to domain services

package/.opencode/devlogs/neural-agents/2026-02-09-1614-neural-feedback-loop-cd044.md

@@ -1,99 +0,0 @@
-# Devlog: neural-feedback-loop-cd044
-
-**Devlog ID**: 2026-02-09-1614-neural-agents
-**Instance**: neural-agents
-**Started**: 2026-02-09 16:14
-**Workspace**: jarvis-opencode
-
----
-
-## Overview
-
-(Describe the goals and scope of this development log)
-
----
-
-## Progress
-
-### Final Status: COMPLETE ✅
-
-| Phase   | Description                                     | Status |
-| ------- | ----------------------------------------------- | ------ |
-| Phase 0 | Grooming Retroativo (6 ACs, 5 artifacts)        | ✅     |
-| Phase 1 | Domain Layer (8 files: events, repos, services) | ✅     |
-| Phase 2 | Application Layer (4 files: 3 use cases)        | ✅     |
-| Phase 3 | Infrastructure Layer (3 files: JSON repos)      | ✅     |
-| Phase 4 | Integration Bridge (2 files: bridge + exports)  | ✅     |
-| Phase 5 | Tests (5 files: 78/78 passing, ruff clean)      | ✅     |
-
-### Test Results
-
-- 23 unit: FeedbackLoopService
-- 24 unit: PerformanceAnalyzer
-- 16 unit: Application UseCases
-- 15 integration: E2E, persistence, bridge, repos
-- Coverage: domain 93-94%, application 88-93%
-
-### Files Created: 19 total
-
-- Domain: 8 | Application: 4 | Infrastructure: 4 | Tests: 5
-
-### Context Memory Notes: 402-408
-
-## Notes
-
-(Additional notes)
-
----
-
-### Update - 2026-02-09 18:56
-
-CD-044 Neural Feedback Loop fully closed out. All 5 phases complete: Domain, Application, Infrastructure, Bridge, Tests. 78/78 tests passing, ruff clean. Card moved to review. Session finished.
-
----
-
-## Devlog Closed
-
-**Ended**: 2026-02-09 19:34
-
-### Git Summary
-
-- Branch: `feature/neural-intelligence-adaptive-system`
-- Commits: 1 (`14db9179`)
-- Files changed: 63 (5,576 insertions, 937 deletions)
-- Pushed: ❌ Not yet pushed to remote
-
-### Key Accomplishments
-
-- Full DDD implementation of Neural Feedback Loop across all layers (Domain, Application, Infrastructure, Integration Bridge)
-- Created 19 new files with clean architecture separation
-- 78/78 tests passing with zero deprecation warnings
-- Replaced `datetime.utcnow()` → `datetime.now(UTC)` across 45 project files (100+ occurrences) — project-wide deprecation cleanup
-- Applied ruff auto-fix: 3,678 lint fixes across entire codebase
-- Code review fixes: encapsulation in LearningModel, state machine bypass fix, type hint corrections, unused import removal
-- Grooming retroativo with 6 acceptance criteria and 5 artifacts registered
-
-### Problems & Solutions
-
-| Problem                                                    | Solution                                                                       |
-| ---------------------------------------------------------- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ |
-| `datetime.utcnow()` deprecated in Python 3.12+             | Replaced with `datetime.now(UTC)` + `from datetime import UTC` in 45 files     |
-| LearningModel exposing internal `_training_data`           | Added `training_sample_count` and `training_data` properties for encapsulation |
-| State machine bypass via `self._state =` direct assignment | Changed to `self.set_state()` in `_retrain_model()` and `_update_metrics()`    |
-| `any` lowercase type hint in `performance_metrics.py`      | Fixed to `Any` with proper import                                              |
-| Ruff lint issues across entire project                     | Batch auto-fix: 3,678 fixes (import sorting, unused imports, whitespace)       |
-
-### Not Completed
-
-- [ ] Push commit to remote (`git push -u origin feature/neural-intelligence-adaptive-system`)
-- [ ] Handle 378 unstaged ruff auto-fix files (separate chore commit or discard)
-- [ ] Code review round 2-4 (CD-044 at review with 0/4 reviews)
-- [ ] Move CD-044 to `done` after reviews pass
-
-### Tips for Future
-
-- Always run tests with `-W error::DeprecationWarning` to catch deprecation issues early
-- Use `uv run python -m pytest` (never bare `pytest`) in this project
-- Protocol pattern (not ABC) is the standard for repository ports in this codebase
-- Max 450 lines/file enforced — plan file splits early
-- Infrastructure layer can write to private attributes (`model._training_data`) for state reconstruction — this is acceptable DDD practice

package/.opencode/devlogs/neural-agents/2026-02-09-2036-EP-004-grooming.md

@@ -1,103 +0,0 @@
-# Devlog: EP-004-grooming
-
-**Devlog ID**: 2026-02-09-2036-neural-agents
-**Instance**: neural-agents
-**Started**: 2026-02-09 20:36
-**Workspace**: jarvis-opencode
-
----
-
-## Overview
-
-Grooming EP-004 (Concurrency Control & Rate Limiting) — 3 cards from grooming → ready.
-Sprint 5 created and activated (SP-005).
-
----
-
-## Progress
-
-### Grooming Complete ✅
-
-| Card   | Title                        | Points | Artifacts              | ACs | Status  |
-| ------ | ---------------------------- | ------ | ---------------------- | --- | ------- |
-| CD-022 | WebSocket Message Queue FIFO | 5pts   | scope_doc + design_doc | 6   | → ready |
-| CD-023 | Rate Limiting per Agent      | 3pts   | scope_doc + design_doc | 5   | → ready |
-| CD-024 | Validation Gate Testing      | 5pts   | scope_doc + design_doc | 7   | → ready |
-
-**Sprint**: SP-005 (active, 2 weeks)
-**Total**: 13 story points ready for implementation
-
-### Key Discoveries During Grooming
-
-| Card   | Discovery                                                                                              |
-| ------ | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ |
-| CD-022 | chat_ws.py integration + DLQ already exist — scope narrowed to domain port, per-agent isolation, tests |
-| CD-023 | Current rate_limiter.py is per-session — needs refactor to per-agent with dna.yaml config              |
-| CD-024 | Full QA domain exists — focus on testing + kanban transition guard pattern                             |
-
-### Artifacts Created (6 files)
-
-- `workspace/neural-agents/artifacts/CD-022_websocket_queue_scope.md`
-- `workspace/neural-agents/artifacts/CD-022_websocket_queue_design.md`
-- `workspace/neural-agents/artifacts/CD-023_rate_limiting_scope.md`
-- `workspace/neural-agents/artifacts/CD-023_rate_limiting_design.md`
-- `workspace/neural-agents/artifacts/CD-024_validation_gate_scope.md`
-- `workspace/neural-agents/artifacts/CD-024_validation_gate_design.md`
-
----
-
-## Notes
-
-- Session: `ep_004_grooming:_cd_022,--20260209_203858`
-- All cards assigned to EP-004 + SP-005
-- Implementation order recommendation: CD-023 (3pts, smallest) → CD-022 (5pts) → CD-024 (5pts, depends on kanban)
-
----
-
----
-
-## Devlog Closed
-
-**Ended**: 2026-02-09 23:27
-
-### Git Summary
-
-- **Branch**: `feature/ep004-concurrency-control` → merged to `master`
-- **Merge commit**: `6120ad6b`
-- **Commits**: 5 (+ 1 merge)
-- **Files changed**: 27
-- **Insertions**: 4,948 | **Deletions**: 924
-
-### Key Accomplishments
-
-- Groomed 3 cards (CD-022, CD-023, CD-024) from backlog → ready with scope_doc + design_doc artifacts
-- Created Sprint SP-005 (active, 2 weeks, 13pts)
-- **CD-023** (3pts): Per-agent rate limiting — RateLimiterPort Protocol, frozen dataclasses, Redis sliding window Lua script, 31 tests
-- **CD-022** (5pts): WebSocket message queue FIFO — MessageQueuePort Protocol, per-agent Redis key isolation, backpressure, 49 tests
-- **CD-024** (5pts): Validation gate testing — 90 tests across domain entities, use cases, and infrastructure (QA system)
-- All 3 cards code-reviewed and approved (CD-023 R1, CD-022 R2, CD-024 R2)
-- **170 new unit tests** total, all passing (237 sprint-wide)
-- Merged Sprint 5 to master successfully
-
-### Problems & Solutions
-
-| Problem                                                                               | Solution                                                             |
-| ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | -------------------------------------------------------------------- |
-| `test_uses_agent_specific_limit` failing — wrong positional index for Lua script args | Fixed index from `[0][4]` to `[0][5]` (window_start vs max_requests) |
-| CD-022 review: dead `count` param in `peek()` broke Protocol alignment (LSP)          | Removed dead parameter to match `MessageQueuePort.peek()` signature  |
-| CD-022 review: mutable `agents` dict on frozen dataclass                              | Added `MappingProxyType` in `__post_init__` for true immutability    |
-| CD-024 review: unused imports (F401) + unsorted imports (I001)                        | `ruff check --fix` auto-resolved all 5 lint issues                   |
-| Kanban invalid transitions (ready→review, doing→tested)                               | Followed proper flow: ready→doing→review→tested→done                 |
-
-### Not Completed
-
-- [ ] Pre-existing test failures in `test_skill_based_dispatch.py` and `test_log_service.py` (unrelated to Sprint 5)
-- [ ] CD-023 MINOR: lazy import pattern and request_id uniqueness (non-blocking, deferred)
-
-### Tips for Future
-
-- Always trace Redis `eval()` positional args carefully — script, numkeys, KEY, then ARGV[1..N]
-- `MappingProxyType` is the standard way to freeze dicts on frozen dataclasses
-- Kanban transitions are strict: must go through each status in order (no skipping)
-- Test files are exempt from the 500-line source file governance rule
-- Parallel agent execution (code-reviewer + script-developer) saves significant time