@mbc-cqrs-serverless/master 0.1.70-beta.0 → 0.1.71-beta.0

package/dist/services/master-setting.service.spec.js

@@ -8,32 +8,34 @@ const master_setting_service_1 = require("./master-setting.service");
 const constants_1 = require("../constants");
 const master_module_definition_1 = require("../master.module-definition");
 const task_1 = require("@mbc-cqrs-serverless/task");
-const optionsMock = {
-    invokeContext: {
-        event: {
-            requestContext: {
-                accountId: '1',
-                http: {
-                    protocol: 'HTTP/1.1',
-                    sourceIp: '127.0.0.1',
-                    userAgent: 'PostmanRuntime/7.28.4',
-                },
-                requestId: '81bf1821-34b0-4dc5-a2ce-685d37d22f8c',
-                authorizer: {
-                    jwt: {
-                        claims: {
-                            sub: 'abc',
-                            'custom:roles': '[{"tenant":"MBC","role":"admin"}]',
-                        },
+const common_1 = require("@nestjs/common");
+const mockInvokeContext = {
+    event: {
+        requestContext: {
+            accountId: '1',
+            http: {
+                protocol: 'HTTP/1.1',
+                sourceIp: '127.0.0.1',
+                userAgent: 'PostmanRuntime/7.28.4',
+            },
+            requestId: '81bf1821-34b0-4dc5-a2ce-685d37d22f8c',
+            authorizer: {
+                jwt: {
+                    claims: {
+                        sub: 'abc',
+                        'custom:roles': '[{"tenant":"MBC","role":"admin"}]',
                     },
                 },
             },
         },
-        context: {
-            awsRequestId: '81bf1821-34b0-4dc5-a2ce-685d37d22f8c',
-        },
+    },
+    context: {
+        awsRequestId: '81bf1821-34b0-4dc5-a2ce-685d37d22f8c',
     },
 };
+const optionsMock = {
+    invokeContext: mockInvokeContext,
+};
 describe('SettingService', () => {
     let service;
     let dataService;
@@ -55,12 +57,7 @@ describe('SettingService', () => {
                     provide: core_1.CommandService,
                     useValue: {
                         publishAsync: jest.fn(),
-                    },
-                },
-                {
-                    provide: core_1.CommandService,
-                    useValue: {
-                        publishAsync: jest.fn(),
+                        publishPartialUpdateAsync: jest.fn(),
                     },
                 },
                 {
@@ -82,6 +79,7 @@ describe('SettingService', () => {
         service = module.get(master_setting_service_1.MasterSettingService);
         dataService = module.get(core_1.DataService);
         commandService = module.get(core_1.CommandService);
+        dynamoDbService = module.get(core_1.DynamoDbService);
     });
     //
     it('should be defined', () => {
@@ -673,6 +671,730 @@ describe('SettingService', () => {
             expect(result).toEqual(mockResponse);
         });
     });
-    describe('deleteSetting', () => { });
+    describe('deleteSetting', () => {
+        /**
+         * Test Overview: Tests deleteSetting method functionality for MasterSettingService
+         * Purpose: Ensures settings can be properly soft deleted with correct version handling
+         * Details: Verifies that settings are marked as deleted rather than physically removed
+         */
+        it('should soft delete existing setting', async () => {
+            const key = { pk: 'MASTER#TEST_TENANT', sk: 'SETTING#TEST_CODE' };
+            const existingData = {
+                id: 'test-id',
+                pk: 'MASTER#TEST_TENANT',
+                sk: 'SETTING#TEST_CODE',
+                code: 'TEST_CODE',
+                name: 'Test Setting',
+                version: 1,
+                type: 'MASTER',
+                tenantCode: 'TEST_TENANT',
+                isDeleted: false,
+                createdAt: new Date(),
+                updatedAt: new Date(),
+            };
+            dataService.getItem.mockResolvedValue(existingData);
+            const mockDeleteResult = {
+                ...existingData,
+                isDeleted: true,
+                version: 1,
+                updatedAt: new Date(),
+            };
+            commandService.publishPartialUpdateAsync.mockResolvedValue(mockDeleteResult);
+            const result = await service.deleteSetting(key, { invokeContext: mockInvokeContext });
+            expect(result).toBeInstanceOf(Object);
+            expect(commandService.publishPartialUpdateAsync).toHaveBeenCalledWith(expect.objectContaining({
+                pk: key.pk,
+                sk: key.sk,
+                version: existingData.version,
+                isDeleted: true,
+            }), { invokeContext: mockInvokeContext });
+        });
+        it('should throw BadRequestException when setting does not exist', async () => {
+            const key = { pk: 'MASTER#TEST_TENANT', sk: 'SETTING#NONEXISTENT' };
+            dataService.getItem.mockResolvedValue(null);
+            await expect(service.deleteSetting(key, { invokeContext: mockInvokeContext }))
+                .rejects.toThrow(common_1.BadRequestException);
+            expect(commandService.publishPartialUpdateAsync).not.toHaveBeenCalled();
+        });
+    });
+    /**
+     * Test Overview: Tests comprehensive error handling scenarios for MasterSettingService operations
+     * Purpose: Ensures the service properly handles database failures, validation errors, and edge cases
+     * Details: Verifies error handling for DynamoDB failures, CommandService errors, and hierarchical processing
+     */
+    describe('Error Handling Scenarios', () => {
+        describe('getSetting - Hierarchical Error Handling', () => {
+            it('should handle DynamoDB tenant data access failures gracefully', async () => {
+                const tenantCode = 'TEST_TENANT';
+                const code = 'TEST_SETTING';
+                const dbError = new Error('DynamoDB access failed');
+                dbError.name = 'ResourceNotFoundException';
+                dynamoDbService.getItem.mockRejectedValue(dbError);
+                await expect(service.getSetting({ code }, { invokeContext: mockInvokeContext }))
+                    .rejects.toThrow(common_1.BadRequestException);
+            });
+            it('should handle malformed tenant data in DynamoDB', async () => {
+                const tenantCode = 'TEST_TENANT';
+                const code = 'TEST_SETTING';
+                dynamoDbService.getItem.mockResolvedValue({
+                    attributes: {
+                        malformedData: 'invalid-json-structure'
+                    }
+                });
+                await expect(service.getSetting({ code }, { invokeContext: mockInvokeContext }))
+                    .rejects.toThrow(common_1.BadRequestException);
+            });
+            it('should handle timeout errors during hierarchical setting retrieval', async () => {
+                const tenantCode = 'TEST_TENANT';
+                const code = 'TEST_SETTING';
+                const timeoutError = new Error('Request timeout');
+                timeoutError.name = 'TimeoutError';
+                dataService.getItem.mockRejectedValue(timeoutError);
+                await expect(service.getSetting({ code }, { invokeContext: mockInvokeContext }))
+                    .rejects.toThrow('Request timeout');
+            });
+        });
+        describe('createCommonTenantSetting - Error Handling', () => {
+            it('should handle CommandService publish failures', async () => {
+                const dto = {
+                    code: 'TEST_SETTING',
+                    name: 'Test Setting',
+                    settingValue: { key: 'value' },
+                };
+                dataService.getItem.mockResolvedValue(null);
+                const publishError = new Error('Command publish failed');
+                commandService.publishAsync.mockRejectedValue(publishError);
+                await expect(service.createCommonTenantSetting(dto, { invokeContext: mockInvokeContext }))
+                    .rejects.toThrow('Command publish failed');
+            });
+            it('should handle database connection errors during existence check', async () => {
+                const dto = {
+                    code: 'TEST_SETTING',
+                    name: 'Test Setting',
+                    settingValue: { key: 'value' },
+                };
+                const dbError = new Error('Database connection failed');
+                dbError.name = 'NetworkingError';
+                dataService.getItem.mockRejectedValue(dbError);
+                await expect(service.createCommonTenantSetting(dto, { invokeContext: mockInvokeContext }))
+                    .rejects.toThrow('Database connection failed');
+            });
+        });
+        describe('updateSetting - Error Handling', () => {
+            it('should handle version conflict errors during update', async () => {
+                const key = { pk: 'MASTER#TEST_TENANT', sk: 'SETTING#TEST_CODE' };
+                const existingData = {
+                    id: 'test-id',
+                    pk: 'MASTER#TEST_TENANT',
+                    sk: 'SETTING#TEST_CODE',
+                    code: 'TEST_CODE',
+                    name: 'Test Setting',
+                    version: 1,
+                    type: 'MASTER',
+                    tenantCode: 'TEST_TENANT',
+                    isDeleted: false,
+                    createdAt: new Date(),
+                    updatedAt: new Date(),
+                };
+                dataService.getItem.mockResolvedValue(existingData);
+                const versionError = new Error('Version conflict');
+                versionError.name = 'ConditionalCheckFailedException';
+                commandService.publishPartialUpdateAsync.mockRejectedValue(versionError);
+                await expect(service.updateSetting(key, { settingValue: { updated: true } }, { invokeContext: mockInvokeContext }))
+                    .rejects.toThrow('Version conflict');
+            });
+            it('should handle concurrent update attempts', async () => {
+                const key = { pk: 'MASTER#TEST_TENANT', sk: 'SETTING#TEST_CODE' };
+                const existingData = {
+                    id: 'test-id',
+                    pk: 'MASTER#TEST_TENANT',
+                    sk: 'SETTING#TEST_CODE',
+                    code: 'TEST_CODE',
+                    name: 'Test Setting',
+                    version: 1,
+                    type: 'MASTER',
+                    tenantCode: 'TEST_TENANT',
+                    isDeleted: false,
+                    createdAt: new Date(),
+                    updatedAt: new Date(),
+                };
+                dataService.getItem.mockResolvedValue(existingData);
+                const concurrencyError = new Error('Concurrent modification');
+                commandService.publishPartialUpdateAsync.mockRejectedValue(concurrencyError);
+                await expect(service.updateSetting(key, { settingValue: { updated: true } }, { invokeContext: mockInvokeContext }))
+                    .rejects.toThrow('Concurrent modification');
+            });
+        });
+    });
+    /**
+     * Test Overview: Tests edge cases and boundary conditions for MasterSettingService operations
+     * Purpose: Ensures the service handles unusual inputs and boundary conditions properly
+     * Details: Verifies behavior with empty values, special characters, and malformed data
+     */
+    describe('Edge Cases and Boundary Conditions', () => {
+        it('should handle empty setting code', async () => {
+            await expect(service.getSetting({ code: 'TEST_SETTING' }, { invokeContext: mockInvokeContext }))
+                .rejects.toThrow(common_1.BadRequestException);
+        });
+        it('should handle null setting code', async () => {
+            await expect(service.getSetting({ code: null }, { invokeContext: mockInvokeContext }))
+                .rejects.toThrow(common_1.BadRequestException);
+        });
+        it('should handle special characters in setting codes', async () => {
+            const specialCode = 'SETTING_特殊文字@#$%';
+            const mockCommonSetting = {
+                id: 'test-id',
+                pk: 'SETTING#COMMON',
+                sk: `SETTING#${specialCode}`,
+                code: specialCode,
+                name: 'Special Setting',
+                version: 1,
+                type: 'MASTER',
+                tenantCode: 'COMMON',
+                isDeleted: false,
+                attributes: { special: true },
+                createdAt: new Date(),
+                updatedAt: new Date(),
+            };
+            dataService.getItem.mockResolvedValue(mockCommonSetting);
+            const result = await service.getSetting({ code: specialCode }, { invokeContext: mockInvokeContext });
+            expect(result).toBeDefined();
+            expect(result).toBeInstanceOf(entities_1.MasterSettingEntity);
+        });
+        it('should handle missing user context in invoke context', async () => {
+            const tenantCode = 'TEST_TENANT';
+            const code = 'TEST_SETTING';
+            const emptyInvokeContext = {};
+            dataService.getItem.mockResolvedValue(null);
+            await expect(service.getSetting({ code }, { invokeContext: mockInvokeContext }))
+                .rejects.toThrow(common_1.BadRequestException);
+        });
+    });
+    describe('createTenantSetting - Edge Cases', () => {
+        it('should handle empty setting values', async () => {
+            const dto = {
+                tenantCode: 'TEST_TENANT',
+                code: 'TEST_SETTING',
+                name: 'Test Setting',
+                settingValue: {},
+            };
+            dataService.getItem.mockResolvedValue(null);
+            const mockResponse = {
+                id: 'test-id',
+                pk: 'SETTING#TEST_TENANT',
+                sk: 'SETTING#TEST_SETTING',
+                version: 1,
+                type: 'MASTER',
+                tenantCode: 'TEST_TENANT',
+                name: 'TEST_SETTING',
+                code: 'TEST_SETTING',
+                isDeleted: false,
+                attributes: {},
+                createdAt: new Date(),
+                updatedAt: new Date(),
+            };
+            commandService.publishAsync.mockResolvedValue(mockResponse);
+            const result = await service.createTenantSetting(dto, { invokeContext: mockInvokeContext });
+            expect(result).toBeInstanceOf(Object);
+            expect(result.attributes).toEqual({});
+        });
+        it('should handle very large setting values', async () => {
+            const largeSettingValue = {};
+            for (let i = 0; i < 1000; i++) {
+                largeSettingValue[`key${i}`] = `value${i}`.repeat(50);
+            }
+            const dto = {
+                tenantCode: 'TEST_TENANT',
+                code: 'LARGE_SETTING',
+                name: 'Large Setting',
+                settingValue: largeSettingValue,
+            };
+            dataService.getItem.mockResolvedValue(null);
+            const mockResponse = {
+                id: 'test-id',
+                pk: 'SETTING#TEST_TENANT',
+                sk: 'SETTING#LARGE_SETTING',
+                version: 1,
+                type: 'MASTER',
+                tenantCode: 'TEST_TENANT',
+                name: 'LARGE_SETTING',
+                code: 'LARGE_SETTING',
+                isDeleted: false,
+                attributes: largeSettingValue,
+                createdAt: new Date(),
+                updatedAt: new Date(),
+            };
+            commandService.publishAsync.mockResolvedValue(mockResponse);
+            const result = await service.createTenantSetting(dto, { invokeContext: mockInvokeContext });
+            expect(result).toBeInstanceOf(Object);
+            expect(Object.keys(result.attributes)).toHaveLength(1000);
+        });
+    });
+    /**
+     * Test Overview: Tests comprehensive deleted setting re-addition scenarios for MasterSettingService
+     * Purpose: Ensures deleted settings can be properly recreated for all setting types with correct version handling
+     * Details: Verifies version increment, attribute preservation, and state transitions for common, tenant, group, and user settings
+     */
+    describe('Deleted Setting Re-addition Scenarios', () => {
+        describe('createCommonTenantSetting - Deleted Setting Recreation', () => {
+            it('should recreate deleted common setting with incremented version', async () => {
+                const dto = {
+                    code: 'RECREATED_SETTING',
+                    name: 'Recreated Setting',
+                    settingValue: { recreated: true, version: 2 },
+                };
+                const existingDeletedSetting = {
+                    id: 'existing-id',
+                    pk: 'SETTING#COMMON',
+                    sk: 'SETTING#RECREATED_SETTING',
+                    code: 'RECREATED_SETTING',
+                    name: 'RECREATED_SETTING',
+                    version: 3,
+                    type: 'MASTER',
+                    tenantCode: 'COMMON',
+                    isDeleted: true,
+                    attributes: { original: true, version: 1 },
+                    createdAt: new Date('2023-01-01'),
+                    updatedAt: new Date('2023-01-02'),
+                };
+                dataService.getItem.mockResolvedValue(existingDeletedSetting);
+                const mockResponse = {
+                    id: 'existing-id',
+                    pk: 'SETTING#COMMON',
+                    sk: 'SETTING#RECREATED_SETTING',
+                    version: 3,
+                    type: 'MASTER',
+                    tenantCode: 'COMMON',
+                    name: 'RECREATED_SETTING',
+                    code: 'RECREATED_SETTING',
+                    isDeleted: false,
+                    attributes: dto.settingValue,
+                    createdAt: new Date('2023-01-01'),
+                    updatedAt: new Date(),
+                };
+                commandService.publishAsync.mockResolvedValue(mockResponse);
+                const result = await service.createCommonTenantSetting(dto, { invokeContext: mockInvokeContext });
+                expect(result).toBeInstanceOf(Object);
+                expect(result.version).toBe(3);
+                expect(result.isDeleted).toBe(false);
+                expect(result.attributes).toEqual({ recreated: true, version: 2 });
+                expect(commandService.publishAsync).toHaveBeenCalledWith(expect.objectContaining({
+                    version: 3,
+                    isDeleted: false,
+                    attributes: { recreated: true, version: 2 },
+                }), { invokeContext: mockInvokeContext });
+            });
+            it('should handle multiple deletion and recreation cycles for common settings', async () => {
+                const dto = {
+                    code: 'CYCLED_SETTING',
+                    name: 'Cycled Setting',
+                    settingValue: { cycle: 4, final: true },
+                };
+                const existingDeletedSetting = {
+                    id: 'existing-id',
+                    pk: 'SETTING#COMMON',
+                    sk: 'SETTING#CYCLED_SETTING',
+                    code: 'CYCLED_SETTING',
+                    name: 'CYCLED_SETTING',
+                    version: 7,
+                    type: 'MASTER',
+                    tenantCode: 'COMMON',
+                    isDeleted: true,
+                    attributes: { cycle: 3, previous: true },
+                    createdAt: new Date('2023-01-01'),
+                    updatedAt: new Date('2023-01-04'),
+                };
+                dataService.getItem.mockResolvedValue(existingDeletedSetting);
+                const mockResponse = {
+                    id: 'existing-id',
+                    pk: 'SETTING#COMMON',
+                    sk: 'SETTING#CYCLED_SETTING',
+                    version: 7,
+                    type: 'MASTER',
+                    tenantCode: 'COMMON',
+                    name: 'CYCLED_SETTING',
+                    code: 'CYCLED_SETTING',
+                    isDeleted: false,
+                    attributes: dto.settingValue,
+                    createdAt: new Date('2023-01-01'),
+                    updatedAt: new Date(),
+                };
+                commandService.publishAsync.mockResolvedValue(mockResponse);
+                const result = await service.createCommonTenantSetting(dto, { invokeContext: mockInvokeContext });
+                expect(result).toBeInstanceOf(Object);
+                expect(result.version).toBe(7);
+                expect(result.isDeleted).toBe(false);
+                expect(result.attributes).toEqual({ cycle: 4, final: true });
+            });
+        });
+        describe('createTenantSetting - Deleted Setting Recreation', () => {
+            it('should recreate deleted tenant setting with proper tenant isolation', async () => {
+                const dto = {
+                    tenantCode: 'TENANT_A',
+                    code: 'TENANT_SETTING',
+                    name: 'Tenant Setting',
+                    settingValue: { tenant: 'A', recreated: true },
+                };
+                const existingDeletedSetting = {
+                    id: 'existing-id',
+                    pk: 'SETTING#TENANT_A',
+                    sk: 'SETTING#TENANT_SETTING',
+                    code: 'TENANT_SETTING',
+                    name: 'TENANT_SETTING',
+                    version: 2,
+                    type: 'MASTER',
+                    tenantCode: 'TENANT_A',
+                    isDeleted: true,
+                    attributes: { tenant: 'A', original: true },
+                    createdAt: new Date('2023-01-01'),
+                    updatedAt: new Date('2023-01-02'),
+                };
+                dataService.getItem.mockResolvedValue(existingDeletedSetting);
+                const mockResponse = {
+                    id: 'existing-id',
+                    pk: 'SETTING#TENANT_A',
+                    sk: 'SETTING#TENANT_SETTING',
+                    version: 2,
+                    type: 'MASTER',
+                    tenantCode: 'TENANT_A',
+                    name: 'TENANT_SETTING',
+                    code: 'TENANT_SETTING',
+                    isDeleted: false,
+                    attributes: dto.settingValue,
+                    createdAt: new Date('2023-01-01'),
+                    updatedAt: new Date(),
+                };
+                commandService.publishAsync.mockResolvedValue(mockResponse);
+                const result = await service.createTenantSetting(dto, { invokeContext: mockInvokeContext });
+                expect(result).toBeInstanceOf(Object);
+                expect(result.version).toBe(2);
+                expect(result.tenantCode).toBe('TENANT_A');
+                expect(result.isDeleted).toBe(false);
+                expect(result.attributes).toEqual({ tenant: 'A', recreated: true });
+            });
+            it('should handle tenant setting recreation with different tenant codes', async () => {
+                const dto = {
+                    tenantCode: 'TENANT_B',
+                    code: 'SHARED_SETTING',
+                    name: 'Shared Setting',
+                    settingValue: { tenant: 'B', value: 'new' },
+                };
+                dataService.getItem.mockResolvedValue(null);
+                const mockResponse = {
+                    id: 'new-id',
+                    pk: 'SETTING#TENANT_B',
+                    sk: 'SETTING#SHARED_SETTING',
+                    version: 1,
+                    type: 'MASTER',
+                    tenantCode: 'TENANT_B',
+                    name: 'SHARED_SETTING',
+                    code: 'SHARED_SETTING',
+                    isDeleted: false,
+                    attributes: dto.settingValue,
+                    createdAt: new Date(),
+                    updatedAt: new Date(),
+                };
+                commandService.publishAsync.mockResolvedValue(mockResponse);
+                const result = await service.createTenantSetting(dto, { invokeContext: mockInvokeContext });
+                expect(result).toBeInstanceOf(Object);
+                expect(result.version).toBe(1);
+                expect(result.tenantCode).toBe('TENANT_B');
+                expect(result.isDeleted).toBe(false);
+            });
+        });
+        describe('createGroupSetting - Deleted Setting Recreation', () => {
+            it('should recreate deleted group setting with group hierarchy validation', async () => {
+                const dto = {
+                    tenantCode: 'TEST_TENANT',
+                    groupId: 'GROUP_123',
+                    code: 'GROUP_SETTING',
+                    name: 'Group Setting',
+                    settingValue: { group: 'GROUP_123', recreated: true },
+                };
+                const existingDeletedSetting = {
+                    id: 'existing-id',
+                    pk: 'SETTING#TEST_TENANT',
+                    sk: 'SETTING#GROUP#GROUP_123#GROUP_SETTING',
+                    code: 'GROUP_SETTING',
+                    name: 'GROUP_SETTING',
+                    version: 4,
+                    type: 'MASTER',
+                    tenantCode: 'TEST_TENANT',
+                    isDeleted: true,
+                    attributes: { group: 'GROUP_123', original: true },
+                    createdAt: new Date('2023-01-01'),
+                    updatedAt: new Date('2023-01-03'),
+                };
+                dataService.getItem.mockResolvedValue(existingDeletedSetting);
+                const mockResponse = {
+                    id: 'existing-id',
+                    pk: 'SETTING#TEST_TENANT',
+                    sk: 'SETTING#GROUP#GROUP_123#GROUP_SETTING',
+                    version: 4,
+                    type: 'MASTER',
+                    tenantCode: 'TEST_TENANT',
+                    name: 'GROUP_SETTING',
+                    code: 'GROUP_SETTING',
+                    isDeleted: false,
+                    attributes: dto.settingValue,
+                    createdAt: new Date('2023-01-01'),
+                    updatedAt: new Date(),
+                };
+                commandService.publishAsync.mockResolvedValue(mockResponse);
+                const result = await service.createGroupSetting(dto, { invokeContext: mockInvokeContext });
+                expect(result).toBeInstanceOf(Object);
+                expect(result.version).toBe(4);
+                expect(result.tenantCode).toBe('TEST_TENANT');
+                expect(result.isDeleted).toBe(false);
+                expect(result.attributes).toEqual({ group: 'GROUP_123', recreated: true });
+            });
+            it('should handle group setting recreation across different groups', async () => {
+                const dto = {
+                    tenantCode: 'TEST_TENANT',
+                    groupId: 'GROUP_456',
+                    code: 'SHARED_GROUP_SETTING',
+                    name: 'Shared Group Setting',
+                    settingValue: { group: 'GROUP_456', value: 'different' },
+                };
+                dataService.getItem.mockResolvedValue(null);
+                const mockResponse = {
+                    id: 'new-id',
+                    pk: 'SETTING#TEST_TENANT',
+                    sk: 'SETTING#GROUP#GROUP_456#SHARED_GROUP_SETTING',
+                    version: 1,
+                    type: 'MASTER',
+                    tenantCode: 'TEST_TENANT',
+                    name: 'SHARED_GROUP_SETTING',
+                    code: 'SHARED_GROUP_SETTING',
+                    isDeleted: false,
+                    attributes: dto.settingValue,
+                    createdAt: new Date(),
+                    updatedAt: new Date(),
+                };
+                commandService.publishAsync.mockResolvedValue(mockResponse);
+                const result = await service.createGroupSetting(dto, { invokeContext: mockInvokeContext });
+                expect(result).toBeInstanceOf(Object);
+                expect(result.version).toBe(1);
+                expect(result.isDeleted).toBe(false);
+                expect(result.attributes).toEqual({ group: 'GROUP_456', value: 'different' });
+            });
+        });
+        describe('createUserSetting - Deleted Setting Recreation', () => {
+            it('should recreate deleted user setting with user context validation', async () => {
+                const dto = {
+                    tenantCode: 'TEST_TENANT',
+                    userId: 'USER_789',
+                    code: 'USER_SETTING',
+                    name: 'User Setting',
+                    settingValue: { user: 'USER_789', recreated: true },
+                };
+                const existingDeletedSetting = {
+                    id: 'existing-id',
+                    pk: 'SETTING#TEST_TENANT',
+                    sk: 'SETTING#USER#USER_789#USER_SETTING',
+                    code: 'USER_SETTING',
+                    name: 'USER_SETTING',
+                    version: 6,
+                    type: 'MASTER',
+                    tenantCode: 'TEST_TENANT',
+                    isDeleted: true,
+                    attributes: { user: 'USER_789', original: true },
+                    createdAt: new Date('2023-01-01'),
+                    updatedAt: new Date('2023-01-05'),
+                };
+                dataService.getItem.mockResolvedValue(existingDeletedSetting);
+                const mockResponse = {
+                    id: 'existing-id',
+                    pk: 'SETTING#TEST_TENANT',
+                    sk: 'SETTING#USER#USER_789#USER_SETTING',
+                    version: 6,
+                    type: 'MASTER',
+                    tenantCode: 'TEST_TENANT',
+                    name: 'USER_SETTING',
+                    code: 'USER_SETTING',
+                    isDeleted: false,
+                    attributes: dto.settingValue,
+                    createdAt: new Date('2023-01-01'),
+                    updatedAt: new Date(),
+                };
+                commandService.publishAsync.mockResolvedValue(mockResponse);
+                const result = await service.createUserSetting(dto, { invokeContext: mockInvokeContext });
+                expect(result).toBeInstanceOf(Object);
+                expect(result.version).toBe(6);
+                expect(result.tenantCode).toBe('TEST_TENANT');
+                expect(result.isDeleted).toBe(false);
+                expect(result.attributes).toEqual({ user: 'USER_789', recreated: true });
+            });
+            it('should preserve original creation timestamp when recreating user setting', async () => {
+                const originalCreatedAt = new Date('2023-01-01T08:00:00Z');
+                const dto = {
+                    tenantCode: 'TEST_TENANT',
+                    userId: 'USER_ABC',
+                    code: 'TIMESTAMP_SETTING',
+                    name: 'Timestamp Setting',
+                    settingValue: { preserveTimestamp: true },
+                };
+                const existingDeletedSetting = {
+                    id: 'existing-id',
+                    pk: 'SETTING#TEST_TENANT',
+                    sk: 'SETTING#USER#USER_ABC#TIMESTAMP_SETTING',
+                    code: 'TIMESTAMP_SETTING',
+                    name: 'TIMESTAMP_SETTING',
+                    version: 3,
+                    type: 'MASTER',
+                    tenantCode: 'TEST_TENANT',
+                    isDeleted: true,
+                    attributes: { original: true },
+                    createdAt: originalCreatedAt,
+                    updatedAt: new Date('2023-01-02'),
+                };
+                dataService.getItem.mockResolvedValue(existingDeletedSetting);
+                const mockResponse = {
+                    id: 'existing-id',
+                    pk: 'SETTING#TEST_TENANT',
+                    sk: 'SETTING#USER#USER_ABC#TIMESTAMP_SETTING',
+                    version: 3,
+                    type: 'MASTER',
+                    tenantCode: 'TEST_TENANT',
+                    name: 'TIMESTAMP_SETTING',
+                    code: 'TIMESTAMP_SETTING',
+                    isDeleted: false,
+                    attributes: dto.settingValue,
+                    createdAt: originalCreatedAt,
+                    updatedAt: new Date(),
+                };
+                commandService.publishAsync.mockResolvedValue(mockResponse);
+                const result = await service.createUserSetting(dto, { invokeContext: mockInvokeContext });
+                expect(result).toBeInstanceOf(Object);
+                expect(result.createdAt).toEqual(originalCreatedAt);
+                expect(result.isDeleted).toBe(false);
+                expect(result.attributes).toEqual({ preserveTimestamp: true });
+            });
+        });
+    });
+    /**
+     * Test Overview: Tests concurrent operation scenarios for MasterSettingService
+     * Purpose: Ensures the service handles simultaneous operations correctly with proper version control
+     * Details: Verifies race condition handling, version conflicts, and concurrent hierarchical setting operations
+     */
+    describe('Concurrent Operation Scenarios', () => {
+        describe('getSetting - Concurrent Hierarchical Access', () => {
+            it('should handle concurrent hierarchical setting access correctly', async () => {
+                const tenantCode = 'TEST_TENANT';
+                const code = 'CONCURRENT_SETTING';
+                const mockCommonSetting = {
+                    id: 'test-id',
+                    pk: 'SETTING#COMMON',
+                    sk: 'SETTING#CONCURRENT_SETTING',
+                    code: 'CONCURRENT_SETTING',
+                    name: 'Concurrent Setting',
+                    version: 1,
+                    type: 'MASTER',
+                    tenantCode: 'COMMON',
+                    isDeleted: false,
+                    attributes: { concurrent: true },
+                    createdAt: new Date(),
+                    updatedAt: new Date(),
+                };
+                dataService.getItem.mockResolvedValue(mockCommonSetting);
+                const promises = Array.from({ length: 5 }, () => service.getSetting({ code }, { invokeContext: mockInvokeContext }));
+                const results = await Promise.all(promises);
+                results.forEach(result => {
+                    expect(result).toBeInstanceOf(entities_1.MasterSettingEntity);
+                    expect(result).toBeDefined();
+                });
+            });
+            it('should handle mixed success and failure in concurrent hierarchical access', async () => {
+                const tenantCode = 'TEST_TENANT';
+                const code = 'MIXED_SETTING';
+                dataService.getItem
+                    .mockResolvedValueOnce(null)
+                    .mockRejectedValueOnce(new Error('User fetch failed'))
+                    .mockResolvedValueOnce(null);
+                const results = await Promise.allSettled([
+                    service.getSetting({ code }, { invokeContext: mockInvokeContext }),
+                    service.getSetting({ code }, { invokeContext: mockInvokeContext }),
+                    service.getSetting({ code }, { invokeContext: mockInvokeContext })
+                ]);
+                expect(results[0].status).toBe('rejected');
+                expect(results[1].status).toBe('rejected');
+                expect(results[2].status).toBe('rejected');
+            });
+        });
+        describe('createTenantSetting - Concurrent Operations', () => {
+            it('should handle concurrent tenant setting creation with version conflicts', async () => {
+                const dto1 = {
+                    tenantCode: 'TEST_TENANT',
+                    code: 'CONCURRENT_SETTING',
+                    name: 'Concurrent Setting 1',
+                    settingValue: { first: true },
+                };
+                const dto2 = {
+                    tenantCode: 'TEST_TENANT',
+                    code: 'CONCURRENT_SETTING',
+                    name: 'Concurrent Setting 2',
+                    settingValue: { second: true },
+                };
+                dataService.getItem.mockResolvedValue(null);
+                const mockResponse1 = {
+                    id: 'test-id-1',
+                    pk: 'SETTING#TEST_TENANT',
+                    sk: 'SETTING#CONCURRENT_SETTING',
+                    version: 1,
+                    type: 'MASTER',
+                    tenantCode: 'TEST_TENANT',
+                    name: 'CONCURRENT_SETTING',
+                    code: 'CONCURRENT_SETTING',
+                    isDeleted: false,
+                    attributes: dto1.settingValue,
+                    createdAt: new Date(),
+                    updatedAt: new Date(),
+                };
+                const versionConflictError = new Error('Version conflict');
+                versionConflictError.name = 'ConditionalCheckFailedException';
+                commandService.publishAsync
+                    .mockResolvedValueOnce(mockResponse1)
+                    .mockRejectedValueOnce(versionConflictError);
+                const result1 = await service.createTenantSetting(dto1, { invokeContext: mockInvokeContext });
+                await expect(service.createTenantSetting(dto2, { invokeContext: mockInvokeContext }))
+                    .rejects.toThrow('Version conflict');
+                expect(result1).toBeInstanceOf(Object);
+                expect(result1.attributes).toEqual({ first: true });
+            });
+        });
+        describe('updateSetting - Concurrent Operations', () => {
+            it('should handle concurrent setting updates with proper version control', async () => {
+                const key = { pk: 'SETTING#TEST_TENANT', sk: 'SETTING#UPDATE_TEST' };
+                const existingData = {
+                    id: 'test-id',
+                    pk: 'SETTING#TEST_TENANT',
+                    sk: 'SETTING#UPDATE_TEST',
+                    code: 'UPDATE_TEST',
+                    name: 'Update Test',
+                    version: 1,
+                    type: 'MASTER',
+                    tenantCode: 'TEST_TENANT',
+                    isDeleted: false,
+                    createdAt: new Date(),
+                    updatedAt: new Date(),
+                };
+                dataService.getItem.mockResolvedValue(existingData);
+                const mockUpdateResult1 = {
+                    ...existingData,
+                    version: 2,
+                    updatedAt: new Date(),
+                };
+                const versionConflictError = new Error('Version conflict');
+                versionConflictError.name = 'ConditionalCheckFailedException';
+                commandService.publishPartialUpdateAsync
+                    .mockResolvedValueOnce(mockUpdateResult1)
+                    .mockRejectedValueOnce(versionConflictError);
+                const result1 = await service.updateSetting(key, { settingValue: { updated: true } }, { invokeContext: mockInvokeContext });
+                await expect(service.updateSetting(key, { settingValue: { updated: true } }, { invokeContext: mockInvokeContext }))
+                    .rejects.toThrow('Version conflict');
+                expect(result1.version).toBe(2);
+            });
+        });
+    });
 });
 //# sourceMappingURL=master-setting.service.spec.js.map