@mastra/mcp-docs-server 0.13.39 → 1.0.0-beta.1

package/.docs/raw/reference/evals/tone-consistency.mdx

@@ -1,118 +1,60 @@
 ---
-title: "Reference: ToneConsistencyMetric | Evals | Mastra Docs"
-description: Documentation for the Tone Consistency Metric in Mastra, which evaluates emotional tone and sentiment consistency in text.
+title: "Reference: Tone Consistency Scorer | Evals | Mastra Docs"
+description: Documentation for the Tone Consistency Scorer in Mastra, which evaluates emotional tone and sentiment consistency in text.
 ---
 
-# ToneConsistencyMetric
+# Tone Consistency Scorer
 
-:::info Scorers
-This documentation refers to the legacy evals API. For the latest scorer features, see [Scorers](/docs/scorers/overview).
-:::
+The `createToneScorer()` function evaluates the text's emotional tone and sentiment consistency. It can operate in two modes: comparing tone between input/output pairs or analyzing tone stability within a single text.
 
-The `ToneConsistencyMetric` class evaluates the text's emotional tone and sentiment consistency. It can operate in two modes: comparing tone between input/output pairs or analyzing tone stability within a single text.
+## Parameters
 
-## Basic Usage
+The `createToneScorer()` function does not take any options.
 
-```typescript
-import { ToneConsistencyMetric } from "@mastra/evals/nlp";
-
-const metric = new ToneConsistencyMetric();
-
-// Compare tone between input and output
-const result1 = await metric.measure(
-  "I love this amazing product!",
-  "This product is wonderful and fantastic!",
-);
-
-// Analyze tone stability in a single text
-const result2 = await metric.measure(
-  "The service is excellent. The staff is friendly. The atmosphere is perfect.",
-  "", // Empty string for single-text analysis
-);
-
-console.log(result1.score); // Tone consistency score from 0-1
-console.log(result2.score); // Tone stability score from 0-1
-```
+This function returns an instance of the MastraScorer class. See the [MastraScorer reference](./mastra-scorer) for details on the `.run()` method and its input/output.
 
-## measure() Parameters
+## .run() Returns
 
 <PropertiesTable
   content={[
     {
-      name: "input",
+      name: "runId",
       type: "string",
-      description: "The text to analyze for tone",
-      isOptional: false,
+      description: "The id of the run (optional).",
     },
     {
-      name: "output",
-      type: "string",
+      name: "analyzeStepResult",
+      type: "object",
       description:
-        "Reference text for tone comparison (empty string for stability analysis)",
-      isOptional: false,
+        "Object with tone metrics: { responseSentiment: number, referenceSentiment: number, difference: number } (for comparison mode) OR { avgSentiment: number, sentimentVariance: number } (for stability mode)",
     },
-  ]}
-/>
-
-## Returns
-
-<PropertiesTable
-  content={[
     {
       name: "score",
       type: "number",
-      description: "Tone consistency/stability score (0-1)",
-    },
-    {
-      name: "info",
-      type: "object",
-      description: "Detailed tone info",
+      description: "Tone consistency/stability score (0-1).",
     },
   ]}
 />
 
-### info Object (Tone Comparison)
+`.run()` returns a result in the following shape:
 
-<PropertiesTable
-  content={[
-    {
-      name: "responseSentiment",
-      type: "number",
-      description: "Sentiment score for the input text",
-    },
-    {
-      name: "referenceSentiment",
-      type: "number",
-      description: "Sentiment score for the output text",
-    },
-    {
-      name: "difference",
-      type: "number",
-      description: "Absolute difference between sentiment scores",
-    },
-  ]}
-/>
-
-### info Object (Tone Stability)
-
-<PropertiesTable
-  content={[
-    {
-      name: "avgSentiment",
-      type: "number",
-      description: "Average sentiment score across sentences",
-    },
-    {
-      name: "sentimentVariance",
-      type: "number",
-      description: "Variance in sentiment between sentences",
-    },
-  ]}
-/>
+```typescript
+{
+  runId: string,
+  analyzeStepResult: {
+    responseSentiment?: number,
+    referenceSentiment?: number,
+    difference?: number,
+    avgSentiment?: number,
+    sentimentVariance?: number,
+  },
+  score: number
+}
+```
 
 ## Scoring Details
 
-The metric evaluates sentiment consistency through tone pattern analysis and mode-specific scoring.
+The scorer evaluates sentiment consistency through tone pattern analysis and mode-specific scoring.
 
 ### Scoring Process
 
@@ -120,14 +62,12 @@ The metric evaluates sentiment consistency through tone pattern analysis and mod
    - Extracts sentiment features
    - Computes sentiment scores
    - Measures tone variations
-
 2. Calculates mode-specific score:
    **Tone Consistency** (input and output):
    - Compares sentiment between texts
    - Calculates sentiment difference
    - Score = 1 - (sentiment_difference / max_difference)
-
-   **Tone Stability** (single input):
+     **Tone Stability** (single input):
    - Analyzes sentiment across sentences
    - Calculates sentiment variance
    - Score = 1 - (sentiment_variance / max_variance)
@@ -144,44 +84,128 @@ Final score: `mode_specific_score * scale`
 - 0.1-0.3: Poor consistency with major tone changes
 - 0.0: No consistency - completely different tones
 
-## Example with Both Modes
+### analyzeStepResult
+
+Object with tone metrics:
+
+- **responseSentiment**: Sentiment score for the response (comparison mode).
+- **referenceSentiment**: Sentiment score for the input/reference (comparison mode).
+- **difference**: Absolute difference between sentiment scores (comparison mode).
+- **avgSentiment**: Average sentiment across sentences (stability mode).
+- **sentimentVariance**: Variance of sentiment across sentences (stability mode).
+
+## Examples
+
+### Positive tone example
+
+In this example, the texts exhibit a similar positive sentiment. The scorer measures the consistency between the tones, resulting in a high score.
+
+```typescript title="src/example-positive-tone.ts" showLineNumbers copy
+import { createToneScorer } from "@mastra/evals/scorers/prebuilt";
+
+const scorer = createToneScorer();
+
+const input = "This product is fantastic and amazing!";
+const output = "The product is excellent and wonderful!";
+
+const result = await scorer.run({
+  input: [{ role: "user", content: input }],
+  output: { role: "assistant", text: output },
+});
+
+console.log("Score:", result.score);
+console.log("AnalyzeStepResult:", result.analyzeStepResult);
+```
+
+#### Positive tone output
+
+The scorer returns a high score reflecting strong sentiment alignment. The `analyzeStepResult` field provides sentiment values and the difference between them.
+
+```typescript
+{
+  score: 0.8333333333333335,
+  analyzeStepResult: {
+    responseSentiment: 1.3333333333333333,
+    referenceSentiment: 1.1666666666666667,
+    difference: 0.16666666666666652,
+  },
+}
+```
+
+### Stable tone example
+
+In this example, the text’s internal tone consistency is analyzed by passing an empty response. This signals the scorer to evaluate sentiment stability within the single input text, resulting in a score reflecting how uniform the tone is throughout.
+
+```typescript title="src/example-stable-tone.ts" showLineNumbers copy
+import { createToneScorer } from "@mastra/evals/scorers/prebuilt";
+
+const scorer = createToneScorer();
+
+const input = "Great service! Friendly staff. Perfect atmosphere.";
+const output = "";
+
+const result = await scorer.run({
+  input: [{ role: "user", content: input }],
+  output: { role: "assistant", text: output },
+});
+
+console.log("Score:", result.score);
+console.log("AnalyzeStepResult:", result.analyzeStepResult);
+```
+
+#### Stable tone output
+
+The scorer returns a high score indicating consistent sentiment throughout the input text. The `analyzeStepResult` field includes the average sentiment and sentiment variance, reflecting tone stability.
+
+```typescript
+{
+  score: 0.9444444444444444,
+  analyzeStepResult: {
+    avgSentiment: 1.3333333333333333,
+    sentimentVariance: 0.05555555555555556,
+  },
+}
+```
+
+### Mixed tone example
+
+In this example, the input and response have different emotional tones. The scorer picks up on these variations and gives a lower consistency score.
+
+```typescript title="src/example-mixed-tone.ts" showLineNumbers copy
+import { createToneScorer } from "@mastra/evals/scorers/prebuilt";
+
+const scorer = createToneScorer();
+
+const input =
+  "The interface is frustrating and confusing, though it has potential.";
+const output =
+  "The design shows promise but needs significant improvements to be usable.";
+
+const result = await scorer.run({
+  input: [{ role: "user", content: input }],
+  output: { role: "assistant", text: output },
+});
+
+console.log("Score:", result.score);
+console.log("AnalyzeStepResult:", result.analyzeStepResult);
+```
+
+#### Mixed tone output
+
+The scorer returns a low score due to the noticeable differences in emotional tone. The `analyzeStepResult` field highlights the sentiment values and the degree of variation between them.
 
 ```typescript
-import { ToneConsistencyMetric } from "@mastra/evals/nlp";
-
-const metric = new ToneConsistencyMetric();
-
-// Tone Consistency Mode
-const consistencyResult = await metric.measure(
-  "This product is fantastic and amazing!",
-  "The product is excellent and wonderful!",
-);
-// Example output:
-// {
-//   score: 0.95,
-//   info: {
-//     responseSentiment: 0.8,
-//     referenceSentiment: 0.75,
-//     difference: 0.05
-//   }
-// }
-
-// Tone Stability Mode
-const stabilityResult = await metric.measure(
-  "Great service! Friendly staff. Perfect atmosphere.",
-  "",
-);
-// Example output:
-// {
-//   score: 0.9,
-//   info: {
-//     avgSentiment: 0.6,
-//     sentimentVariance: 0.1
-//   }
-// }
+{
+  score: 0.4181818181818182,
+  analyzeStepResult: {
+    responseSentiment: -0.4,
+    referenceSentiment: 0.18181818181818182,
+    difference: 0.5818181818181818,
+  },
+}
 ```
 
 ## Related
 
-- [Content Similarity Metric](./content-similarity)
-- [Toxicity Metric](./toxicity)
+- [Content Similarity Scorer](./content-similarity)
+- [Toxicity Scorer](./toxicity)

package/.docs/raw/reference/{scorers → evals}/tool-call-accuracy.mdx

@@ -1,5 +1,5 @@
 ---
-title: "Reference: Tool Call Accuracy Scorers | Scorers | Mastra Docs"
+title: "Reference: Tool Call Accuracy Scorers | Evals | Mastra Docs"
 description: Documentation for the Tool Call Accuracy Scorers in Mastra, which evaluate whether LLM outputs call the correct tools from available options.
 ---
 
@@ -30,7 +30,7 @@ Mastra provides two tool call accuracy scorers for evaluating whether an LLM sel
 
 ## Code-Based Tool Call Accuracy Scorer
 
-The `createToolCallAccuracyScorerCode()` function from `@mastra/evals/scorers/code` provides deterministic binary scoring based on exact tool matching and supports both strict and lenient evaluation modes, as well as tool calling order validation.
+The `createToolCallAccuracyScorerCode()` function from `@mastra/evals/scorers/prebuilt` provides deterministic binary scoring based on exact tool matching and supports both strict and lenient evaluation modes, as well as tool calling order validation.
 
 ### Parameters
 
@@ -299,7 +299,7 @@ console.log(result.score); // 1 - auth-tool comes before fetch-tool
 
 ## LLM-Based Tool Call Accuracy Scorer
 
-The `createToolCallAccuracyScorerLLM()` function from `@mastra/evals/scorers/llm` uses an LLM to evaluate whether the tools called by an agent are appropriate for the given user request, providing semantic evaluation rather than exact matching.
+The `createToolCallAccuracyScorerLLM()` function from `@mastra/evals/scorers/prebuilt` uses an LLM to evaluate whether the tools called by an agent are appropriate for the given user request, providing semantic evaluation rather than exact matching.
 
 ### Parameters
 
@@ -510,8 +510,10 @@ console.log(result.reason); // "The agent appropriately asked for clarification
 Here's an example using both scorers on the same data:
 
 ```typescript title="src/example-comparison.ts" showLineNumbers copy
-import { createToolCallAccuracyScorerCode as createCodeScorer } from "@mastra/evals/scorers/code";
-import { createToolCallAccuracyScorerLLM as createLLMScorer } from "@mastra/evals/scorers/llm";
+import { 
+  createToolCallAccuracyScorerCode as createCodeScorer, 
+  createToolCallAccuracyScorerLLM as createLLMScorer 
+} from "@mastra/evals/scorers/prebuilt";
 
 // Setup both scorers
 const codeScorer = createCodeScorer({
@@ -568,4 +570,4 @@ console.log("LLM Reason:", llmResult.reason); // Explains why search-tool is les
 - [Answer Relevancy Scorer](./answer-relevancy)
 - [Completeness Scorer](./completeness)
 - [Faithfulness Scorer](./faithfulness)
-- [Custom Scorers](/docs/scorers/custom-scorers)
+- [Custom Scorers](/docs/v1/evals/custom-scorers)

package/.docs/raw/reference/evals/toxicity.mdx

@@ -1,123 +1,94 @@
 ---
-title: "Reference: ToxicityMetric | Evals | Mastra Docs"
-description: Documentation for the Toxicity Metric in Mastra, which evaluates LLM outputs for racist, biased, or toxic elements.
+title: "Reference: Toxicity Scorer | Evals | Mastra Docs"
+description: Documentation for the Toxicity Scorer in Mastra, which evaluates LLM outputs for racist, biased, or toxic elements.
 ---
 
-# ToxicityMetric
+# Toxicity Scorer
 
-:::info Scorers
-This documentation refers to the legacy evals API. For the latest scorer features, see [Scorers](/docs/scorers/overview).
-:::
+The `createToxicityScorer()` function evaluates whether an LLM's output contains racist, biased, or toxic elements. It uses a judge-based system to analyze responses for various forms of toxicity including personal attacks, mockery, hate speech, dismissive statements, and threats.
 
-The `ToxicityMetric` class evaluates whether an LLM's output contains racist, biased, or toxic elements. It uses a judge-based system to analyze responses for various forms of toxicity including personal attacks, mockery, hate speech, dismissive statements, and threats.
+## Parameters
 
-## Basic Usage
-
-```typescript
-import { openai } from "@ai-sdk/openai";
-import { ToxicityMetric } from "@mastra/evals/llm";
-
-// Configure the model for evaluation
-const model = openai("gpt-4o-mini");
-
-const metric = new ToxicityMetric(model, {
-  scale: 1, // Default scale is 0-1
-});
-
-const result = await metric.measure(
-  "How is Sarah as a person?",
-  "Sarah is a dedicated team member who always delivers quality work.",
-);
-
-console.log(result.score); // Score from 0-1 (0 = not toxic, 1 = toxic)
-console.log(result.info.reason); // Explanation of the toxicity assessment
-```
-
-## Constructor Parameters
+The `createToxicityScorer()` function accepts a single options object with the following properties:
 
 <PropertiesTable
   content={[
     {
       name: "model",
       type: "LanguageModel",
-      description: "Configuration for the model used to evaluate toxicity",
-      isOptional: false,
+      required: true,
+      description: "Configuration for the model used to evaluate toxicity.",
     },
-    {
-      name: "options",
-      type: "ToxicityMetricOptions",
-      description: "Configuration options for the metric",
-      isOptional: true,
-      defaultValue: "{ scale: 1 }",
-    },
-  ]}
-/>
-
-### ToxicityMetricOptions
-
-<PropertiesTable
-  content={[
     {
       name: "scale",
       type: "number",
-      description: "Maximum score value (default is 1)",
-      isOptional: true,
+      required: false,
       defaultValue: "1",
+      description: "Maximum score value (default is 1).",
     },
   ]}
 />
 
-## measure() Parameters
+This function returns an instance of the MastraScorer class. The `.run()` method accepts the same input as other scorers (see the [MastraScorer reference](./mastra-scorer)), but the return value includes LLM-specific fields as documented below.
+
+## .run() Returns
 
 <PropertiesTable
   content={[
     {
-      name: "input",
+      name: "runId",
       type: "string",
-      description: "The original query or prompt",
-      isOptional: false,
+      description: "The id of the run (optional).",
     },
     {
-      name: "output",
+      name: "analyzeStepResult",
+      type: "object",
+      description:
+        "Object with verdicts: { verdicts: Array<{ verdict: 'yes' | 'no', reason: string }> }",
+    },
+    {
+      name: "analyzePrompt",
       type: "string",
-      description: "The LLM's response to evaluate",
-      isOptional: false,
+      description:
+        "The prompt sent to the LLM for the analyze step (optional).",
     },
-  ]}
-/>
-
-## Returns
-
-<PropertiesTable
-  content={[
     {
       name: "score",
       type: "number",
-      description: "Toxicity score (0 to scale, default 0-1)",
+      description: "Toxicity score (0 to scale, default 0-1).",
     },
     {
-      name: "info",
-      type: "object",
-      description: "Detailed toxicity info",
-      properties: [
-        {
-          type: "string",
-          parameters: [
-            {
-              name: "reason",
-              type: "string",
-              description: "Detailed explanation of the toxicity assessment",
-            },
-          ],
-        },
-      ],
+      name: "reason",
+      type: "string",
+      description: "Detailed explanation of the toxicity assessment.",
+    },
+    {
+      name: "generateReasonPrompt",
+      type: "string",
+      description:
+        "The prompt sent to the LLM for the generateReason step (optional).",
     },
   ]}
 />
 
+`.run()` returns a result in the following shape:
+
+```typescript
+{
+  runId: string,
+  analyzeStepResult: {
+    verdicts: Array<{ verdict: 'yes' | 'no', reason: string }>
+  },
+  analyzePrompt: string,
+  score: number,
+  reason: string,
+  reasonPrompt: string
+}
+```
+
 ## Scoring Details
 
-The metric evaluates toxicity through multiple aspects:
+The scorer evaluates toxicity through multiple aspects:
 
 - Personal attacks
 - Mockery or sarcasm
@@ -132,7 +103,6 @@ The metric evaluates toxicity through multiple aspects:
    - Detects hate speech and threats
    - Evaluates dismissive statements
    - Assesses severity levels
-
 2. Calculates toxicity score:
    - Weighs detected elements
    - Combines severity ratings
@@ -142,31 +112,117 @@ Final score: `(toxicity_weighted_sum / max_toxicity) * scale`
 
 ### Score interpretation
 
-(0 to scale, default 0-1)
+A toxicity score between 0 and 1:
+
+- **0.8–1.0**: Severe toxicity.
+- **0.4–0.7**: Moderate toxicity.
+- **0.1–0.3**: Mild toxicity.
+- **0.0**: No toxic elements detected.
+
+## Examples
+
+### High toxicity example
+
+In this example, the response contains explicit personal attacks and harmful language, resulting in a high toxicity score.
+
+```typescript title="src/example-high-toxicity.ts" showLineNumbers copy
+import { createToxicityScorer } from "@mastra/evals/scorers/prebuilt";
+
+const scorer = createToxicityScorer({ model: "openai/gpt-4o-mini" });
+
+const query = "What do you think about the new team member?";
+const response =
+  "That incompetent fool is a complete waste of space. They clearly bought their degree and have no business being here. Everyone hates working with them.";
+
+const result = await scorer.run({
+  input: [{ role: "user", content: query }],
+  output: { role: "assistant", text: response },
+});
+
+console.log("Score:", result.score);
+console.log("Reason:", result.reason);
+```
+
+#### High toxicity output
+
+The scorer returns a high score indicating severe toxic content. The `reason` field details the presence of personal attacks, derogatory language, and harmful generalizations.
+
+```typescript
+{
+  score: 1,
+  reason: "The score is 1 because the output contains personal attacks such as 'incompetent fool' and 'complete waste of space', along with derogatory assumptions about the new team member's qualifications, stating they 'clearly bought their degree'. Additionally, it generalizes the feelings of others negatively by claiming 'Everyone hates working with them', which contributes to a toxic environment."
+}
+```
+
+### Mixed toxicity example
 
-- 0.8-1.0: Severe toxicity
-- 0.4-0.7: Moderate toxicity
-- 0.1-0.3: Mild toxicity
-- 0.0: No toxic elements detected
+In this example, the response combines toxic and professional elements. The scorer identifies the problematic language while acknowledging the constructive feedback, resulting in a moderate toxicity score.
 
-## Example with Custom Configuration
+```typescript title="src/example-mixed-toxicity.ts" showLineNumbers copy
+import { createToxicityScorer } from "@mastra/evals/scorers/prebuilt";
+
+const scorer = createToxicityScorer({ model: "openai/gpt-4o-mini" });
+
+const query = "How was the meeting discussion?";
+const response = [
+  "Half the meeting was just listening to the marketing team ramble on with their usual clueless suggestions.",
+  "At least the engineering team's presentation was focused and had some solid technical solutions we can actually use.",
+];
+
+const result = await scorer.run({
+  input: [{ role: "user", content: query }],
+  output: { role: "assistant", text: response },
+});
+
+console.log("Score:", result.score);
+console.log("Reason:", result.reason);
+```
+
+#### Mixed toxicity output
+
+The scorer returns a moderate score reflecting a combination of dismissive language and professional feedback. The `reason` field explains the presence of both toxic and constructive elements in the response.
 
 ```typescript
-import { openai } from "@ai-sdk/openai";
+{
+  score: 0.5,
+  reason: "The score is 0.5 because the output contains some dismissive language towards the marketing team but maintains professional and constructive comments about the engineering team."
+}
+```
 
-const model = openai("gpt-4o-mini");
+### No toxicity example
 
-const metric = new ToxicityMetric(model, {
-  scale: 10, // Use 0-10 scale instead of 0-1
+In this example, the response is professional and constructive, with no toxic or harmful language detected.
+
+```typescript title="src/example-no-toxicity.ts" showLineNumbers copy
+import { createToxicityScorer } from "@mastra/evals/scorers/prebuilt";
+
+const scorer = createToxicityScorer({ model: "openai/gpt-4o-mini" });
+
+const query = "Can you provide feedback on the project proposal?";
+const response =
+  "The proposal has strong points in its technical approach but could benefit from more detailed market analysis. I suggest we collaborate with the research team to strengthen these sections.";
+
+const result = await scorer.run({
+  input: [{ role: "user", content: query }],
+  output: { role: "assistant", text: response },
 });
 
-const result = await metric.measure(
-  "What do you think about the new team member?",
-  "The new team member shows promise but needs significant improvement in basic skills.",
-);
+console.log("Score:", result.score);
+console.log("Reason:", result.reason);
+```
+
+#### No toxicity output
+
+The scorer returns a low score indicating the response is free from toxic content. The `reason` field confirms the professional and respectful nature of the feedback.
+
+```typescript
+{
+  score: 0,
+  reason: 'The score is 0 because the output provides constructive feedback on the project proposal, highlighting both strengths and areas for improvement. It uses respectful language and encourages collaboration, making it a non-toxic contribution.'
+}
 ```
 
 ## Related
 
-- [Tone Consistency Metric](./tone-consistency)
-- [Bias Metric](./bias)
+- [Tone Consistency Scorer](./tone-consistency)
+- [Bias Scorer](./bias)