@mark-gozner/aigile-method 0.4.5

package/core/templates/qa-gate-tmpl.yaml

@@ -0,0 +1,103 @@
+# <!-- Powered by BMAD™ Core -->
+template:
+  id: qa-gate-template-v1
+  name: Quality Gate Decision
+  version: 1.0
+  output:
+    format: yaml
+    filename: qa.qaLocation/gates/{{epic_num}}.{{story_num}}-{{story_slug}}.yml
+    title: "Quality Gate: {{epic_num}}.{{story_num}}"
+
+# Required fields (keep these first)
+schema: 1
+story: "{{epic_num}}.{{story_num}}"
+story_title: "{{story_title}}"
+gate: "{{gate_status}}" # PASS|CONCERNS|FAIL|WAIVED
+status_reason: "{{status_reason}}" # 1-2 sentence summary of why this gate decision
+reviewer: "Quinn (Test Architect)"
+updated: "{{iso_timestamp}}"
+
+# Always present but only active when WAIVED
+waiver: { active: false }
+
+# Issues (if any) - Use fixed severity: low | medium | high
+top_issues: []
+
+# Risk summary (from risk-profile task if run)
+risk_summary:
+  totals: { critical: 0, high: 0, medium: 0, low: 0 }
+  recommendations:
+    must_fix: []
+    monitor: []
+
+# Examples section using block scalars for clarity
+examples:
+  with_issues: |
+    top_issues:
+      - id: "SEC-001"
+        severity: high  # ONLY: low|medium|high
+        finding: "No rate limiting on login endpoint"
+        suggested_action: "Add rate limiting middleware before production"
+      - id: "TEST-001"  
+        severity: medium
+        finding: "Missing integration tests for auth flow"
+        suggested_action: "Add test coverage for critical paths"
+
+  when_waived: |
+    waiver:
+      active: true
+      reason: "Accepted for MVP release - will address in next sprint"
+      approved_by: "Product Owner"
+
+# ============ Optional Extended Fields ============
+# Uncomment and use if your team wants more detail
+
+optional_fields_examples:
+  quality_and_expiry: |
+    quality_score: 75  # 0-100 (optional scoring)
+    expires: "2025-01-26T00:00:00Z"  # Optional gate freshness window
+
+  evidence: |
+    evidence:
+      tests_reviewed: 15
+      risks_identified: 3
+      trace:
+        ac_covered: [1, 2, 3]  # AC numbers with test coverage
+        ac_gaps: [4]  # AC numbers lacking coverage
+
+  nfr_validation: |
+    nfr_validation:
+      security: { status: CONCERNS, notes: "Rate limiting missing" }
+      performance: { status: PASS, notes: "" }
+      reliability: { status: PASS, notes: "" }
+      maintainability: { status: PASS, notes: "" }
+
+  history: |
+    history:  # Append-only audit trail
+      - at: "2025-01-12T10:00:00Z"
+        gate: FAIL
+        note: "Initial review - missing tests"
+      - at: "2025-01-12T15:00:00Z"  
+        gate: CONCERNS
+        note: "Tests added but rate limiting still missing"
+
+  risk_summary: |
+    risk_summary:  # From risk-profile task
+      totals:
+        critical: 0
+        high: 0
+        medium: 0
+        low: 0
+      # 'highest' is emitted only when risks exist
+      recommendations:
+        must_fix: []
+        monitor: []
+
+  recommendations: |
+    recommendations:
+      immediate:  # Must fix before production
+        - action: "Add rate limiting to auth endpoints"
+          refs: ["api/auth/login.ts:42-68"]
+      future:  # Can be addressed later
+        - action: "Consider caching for better performance"
+          refs: ["services/data.service.ts"]

package/core/templates/story-tmpl.yaml

@@ -0,0 +1,138 @@
+# <!-- Powered by BMAD™ Core -->
+template:
+  id: story-template-v2
+  name: Story Document
+  version: 2.0
+  output:
+    format: markdown
+    filename: docs/stories/{{epic_num}}.{{story_num}}.{{story_title_short}}.md
+    title: "Story {{epic_num}}.{{story_num}}: {{story_title_short}}"
+
+workflow:
+  mode: interactive
+  elicitation: advanced-elicitation
+
+agent_config:
+  editable_sections:
+    - Status
+    - Story
+    - Acceptance Criteria
+    - Tasks / Subtasks
+    - Dev Notes
+    - Testing
+    - Change Log
+
+sections:
+  - id: status
+    title: Status
+    type: choice
+    choices: [Draft, Approved, InProgress, Review, Done]
+    instruction: Select the current status of the story
+    owner: scrum-master
+    editors: [scrum-master, dev-agent]
+
+  - id: story
+    title: Story
+    type: template-text
+    template: |
+      **As a** {{role}},
+      **I want** {{action}},
+      **so that** {{benefit}}
+    instruction: Define the user story using the standard format with role, action, and benefit
+    elicit: true
+    owner: scrum-master
+    editors: [scrum-master]
+
+  - id: acceptance-criteria
+    title: Acceptance Criteria
+    type: numbered-list
+    instruction: Copy the acceptance criteria numbered list from the epic file
+    elicit: true
+    owner: scrum-master
+    editors: [scrum-master]
+
+  - id: tasks-subtasks
+    title: Tasks / Subtasks
+    type: bullet-list
+    instruction: |
+      Break down the story into specific tasks and subtasks needed for implementation.
+      Reference applicable acceptance criteria numbers where relevant.
+    template: |
+      - [ ] Task 1 (AC: # if applicable)
+        - [ ] Subtask1.1...
+      - [ ] Task 2 (AC: # if applicable)
+        - [ ] Subtask 2.1...
+      - [ ] Task 3 (AC: # if applicable)
+        - [ ] Subtask 3.1...
+    elicit: true
+    owner: scrum-master
+    editors: [scrum-master, dev-agent]
+
+  - id: dev-notes
+    title: Dev Notes
+    instruction: |
+      Populate relevant information, only what was pulled from actual artifacts from docs folder, relevant to this story:
+      - Do not invent information
+      - If known add Relevant Source Tree info that relates to this story
+      - If there were important notes from previous story that are relevant to this one, include them here
+      - Put enough information in this section so that the dev agent should NEVER need to read the architecture documents, these notes along with the tasks and subtasks must give the Dev Agent the complete context it needs to comprehend with the least amount of overhead the information to complete the story, meeting all AC and completing all tasks+subtasks
+    elicit: true
+    owner: scrum-master
+    editors: [scrum-master]
+    sections:
+      - id: testing-standards
+        title: Testing
+        instruction: |
+          List Relevant Testing Standards from Architecture the Developer needs to conform to:
+          - Test file location
+          - Test standards
+          - Testing frameworks and patterns to use
+          - Any specific testing requirements for this story
+        elicit: true
+        owner: scrum-master
+        editors: [scrum-master]
+
+  - id: change-log
+    title: Change Log
+    type: table
+    columns: [Date, Version, Description, Author]
+    instruction: Track changes made to this story document
+    owner: scrum-master
+    editors: [scrum-master, dev-agent, qa-agent]
+
+  - id: dev-agent-record
+    title: Dev Agent Record
+    instruction: This section is populated by the development agent during implementation
+    owner: dev-agent
+    editors: [dev-agent]
+    sections:
+      - id: agent-model
+        title: Agent Model Used
+        template: "{{agent_model_name_version}}"
+        instruction: Record the specific AI agent model and version used for development
+        owner: dev-agent
+        editors: [dev-agent]
+
+      - id: debug-log-references
+        title: Debug Log References
+        instruction: Reference any debug logs or traces generated during development
+        owner: dev-agent
+        editors: [dev-agent]
+
+      - id: completion-notes
+        title: Completion Notes List
+        instruction: Notes about the completion of tasks and any issues encountered
+        owner: dev-agent
+        editors: [dev-agent]
+
+      - id: file-list
+        title: File List
+        instruction: List all files created, modified, or affected during story implementation
+        owner: dev-agent
+        editors: [dev-agent]
+
+  - id: qa-results
+    title: QA Results
+    instruction: Results from QA Agent QA review of the completed story implementation
+    owner: qa-agent
+    editors: [qa-agent]

package/core/workflows/brownfield-fullstack.yaml

@@ -0,0 +1,298 @@
+# <!-- Powered by BMAD™ Core -->
+workflow:
+  id: brownfield-fullstack
+  name: Brownfield Full-Stack Enhancement
+  description: >-
+    Agent workflow for enhancing existing full-stack applications with new features,
+    modernization, or significant changes. Handles existing system analysis and safe integration.
+  type: brownfield
+  project_types:
+    - feature-addition
+    - refactoring
+    - modernization
+    - integration-enhancement
+
+  sequence:
+    - step: enhancement_classification
+      agent: analyst
+      action: classify enhancement scope
+      notes: |
+        Determine enhancement complexity to route to appropriate path:
+        - Single story (< 4 hours) → Use brownfield-create-story task
+        - Small feature (1-3 stories) → Use brownfield-create-epic task  
+        - Major enhancement (multiple epics) → Continue with full workflow
+
+        Ask user: "Can you describe the enhancement scope? Is this a small fix, a feature addition, or a major enhancement requiring architectural changes?"
+
+    - step: routing_decision
+      condition: based_on_classification
+      routes:
+        single_story:
+          agent: pm
+          uses: brownfield-create-story
+          notes: "Create single story for immediate implementation. Exit workflow after story creation."
+        small_feature:
+          agent: pm
+          uses: brownfield-create-epic
+          notes: "Create focused epic with 1-3 stories. Exit workflow after epic creation."
+        major_enhancement:
+          continue: to_next_step
+          notes: "Continue with comprehensive planning workflow below."
+
+    - step: documentation_check
+      agent: analyst
+      action: check existing documentation
+      condition: major_enhancement_path
+      notes: |
+        Check if adequate project documentation exists:
+        - Look for existing architecture docs, API specs, coding standards
+        - Assess if documentation is current and comprehensive
+        - If adequate: Skip document-project, proceed to PRD
+        - If inadequate: Run document-project first
+
+    - step: project_analysis
+      agent: architect
+      action: analyze existing project and use task document-project
+      creates: brownfield-architecture.md (or multiple documents)
+      condition: documentation_inadequate
+      notes: "Run document-project to capture current system state, technical debt, and constraints. Pass findings to PRD creation."
+
+    - agent: pm
+      creates: prd.md
+      uses: brownfield-prd-tmpl
+      requires: existing_documentation_or_analysis
+      notes: |
+        Creates PRD for major enhancement. If document-project was run, reference its output to avoid re-analysis.
+        If skipped, use existing project documentation.
+        SAVE OUTPUT: Copy final prd.md to your project's docs/ folder.
+
+    - step: architecture_decision
+      agent: pm/architect
+      action: determine if architecture document needed
+      condition: after_prd_creation
+      notes: |
+        Review PRD to determine if architectural planning is needed:
+        - New architectural patterns → Create architecture doc
+        - New libraries/frameworks → Create architecture doc
+        - Platform/infrastructure changes → Create architecture doc
+        - Following existing patterns → Skip to story creation
+
+    - agent: architect
+      creates: architecture.md
+      uses: brownfield-architecture-tmpl
+      requires: prd.md
+      condition: architecture_changes_needed
+      notes: "Creates architecture ONLY for significant architectural changes. SAVE OUTPUT: Copy final architecture.md to your project's docs/ folder."
+
+    - agent: po
+      validates: all_artifacts
+      uses: po-master-checklist
+      notes: "Validates all documents for integration safety and completeness. May require updates to any document."
+
+    - agent: various
+      updates: any_flagged_documents
+      condition: po_checklist_issues
+      notes: "If PO finds issues, return to relevant agent to fix and re-export updated documents to docs/ folder."
+
+    - agent: po
+      action: shard_documents
+      creates: sharded_docs
+      requires: all_artifacts_in_project
+      notes: |
+        Shard documents for IDE development:
+        - Option A: Use PO agent to shard: @po then ask to shard docs/prd.md
+        - Option B: Manual: Drag shard-doc task + docs/prd.md into chat
+        - Creates docs/prd/ and docs/architecture/ folders with sharded content
+
+    - agent: sm
+      action: create_story
+      creates: story.md
+      requires: sharded_docs_or_brownfield_docs
+      repeats: for_each_epic_or_enhancement
+      notes: |
+        Story creation cycle:
+        - For sharded PRD: @sm → *create (uses create-next-story)
+        - For brownfield docs: @sm → use create-brownfield-story task
+        - Creates story from available documentation
+        - Story starts in "Draft" status
+        - May require additional context gathering for brownfield
+
+    - agent: analyst/pm
+      action: review_draft_story
+      updates: story.md
+      requires: story.md
+      optional: true
+      condition: user_wants_story_review
+      notes: |
+        OPTIONAL: Review and approve draft story
+        - NOTE: story-review task coming soon
+        - Review story completeness and alignment
+        - Update story status: Draft → Approved
+
+    - agent: dev
+      action: implement_story
+      creates: implementation_files
+      requires: story.md
+      notes: |
+        Dev Agent (New Chat): @dev
+        - Implements approved story
+        - Updates File List with all changes
+        - Marks story as "Review" when complete
+
+    - agent: qa
+      action: review_implementation
+      updates: implementation_files
+      requires: implementation_files
+      optional: true
+      notes: |
+        OPTIONAL: QA Agent (New Chat): @qa → review-story
+        - Senior dev review with refactoring ability
+        - Fixes small issues directly
+        - Leaves checklist for remaining items
+        - Updates story status (Review → Done or stays Review)
+
+    - agent: dev
+      action: address_qa_feedback
+      updates: implementation_files
+      condition: qa_left_unchecked_items
+      notes: |
+        If QA left unchecked items:
+        - Dev Agent (New Chat): Address remaining items
+        - Return to QA for final approval
+
+    - step: repeat_development_cycle
+      action: continue_for_all_stories
+      notes: |
+        Repeat story cycle (SM → Dev → QA) for all epic stories
+        Continue until all stories in PRD are complete
+
+    - agent: po
+      action: epic_retrospective
+      creates: epic-retrospective.md
+      condition: epic_complete
+      optional: true
+      notes: |
+        OPTIONAL: After epic completion
+        - NOTE: epic-retrospective task coming soon
+        - Validate epic was completed correctly
+        - Document learnings and improvements
+
+    - step: workflow_end
+      action: project_complete
+      notes: |
+        All stories implemented and reviewed!
+        Project development phase complete.
+
+        Reference: .bmad-core/data/bmad-kb.md#IDE Development Workflow
+
+  flow_diagram: |
+    ```mermaid
+    graph TD
+        A[Start: Brownfield Enhancement] --> B[analyst: classify enhancement scope]
+        B --> C{Enhancement Size?}
+        
+        C -->|Single Story| D[pm: brownfield-create-story]
+        C -->|1-3 Stories| E[pm: brownfield-create-epic]
+        C -->|Major Enhancement| F[analyst: check documentation]
+        
+        D --> END1[To Dev Implementation]
+        E --> END2[To Story Creation]
+        
+        F --> G{Docs Adequate?}
+        G -->|No| H[architect: document-project]
+        G -->|Yes| I[pm: brownfield PRD]
+        H --> I
+        
+        I --> J{Architecture Needed?}
+        J -->|Yes| K[architect: architecture.md]
+        J -->|No| L[po: validate artifacts]
+        K --> L
+        
+        L --> M{PO finds issues?}
+        M -->|Yes| N[Fix issues]
+        M -->|No| O[po: shard documents]
+        N --> L
+        
+        O --> P[sm: create story]
+        P --> Q{Story Type?}
+        Q -->|Sharded PRD| R[create-next-story]
+        Q -->|Brownfield Docs| S[create-brownfield-story]
+        
+        R --> T{Review draft?}
+        S --> T
+        T -->|Yes| U[review & approve]
+        T -->|No| V[dev: implement]
+        U --> V
+        
+        V --> W{QA review?}
+        W -->|Yes| X[qa: review]
+        W -->|No| Y{More stories?}
+        X --> Z{Issues?}
+        Z -->|Yes| AA[dev: fix]
+        Z -->|No| Y
+        AA --> X
+        Y -->|Yes| P
+        Y -->|No| AB{Retrospective?}
+        AB -->|Yes| AC[po: retrospective]
+        AB -->|No| AD[Complete]
+        AC --> AD
+
+        style AD fill:#90EE90
+        style END1 fill:#90EE90
+        style END2 fill:#90EE90
+        style D fill:#87CEEB
+        style E fill:#87CEEB
+        style I fill:#FFE4B5
+        style K fill:#FFE4B5
+        style O fill:#ADD8E6
+        style P fill:#ADD8E6
+        style V fill:#ADD8E6
+        style U fill:#F0E68C
+        style X fill:#F0E68C
+        style AC fill:#F0E68C
+    ```
+
+  decision_guidance:
+    when_to_use:
+      - Enhancement requires coordinated stories
+      - Architectural changes are needed
+      - Significant integration work required
+      - Risk assessment and mitigation planning necessary
+      - Multiple team members will work on related changes
+
+  handoff_prompts:
+    classification_complete: |
+      Enhancement classified as: {{enhancement_type}}
+      {{if single_story}}: Proceeding with brownfield-create-story task for immediate implementation.
+      {{if small_feature}}: Creating focused epic with brownfield-create-epic task.
+      {{if major_enhancement}}: Continuing with comprehensive planning workflow.
+
+    documentation_assessment: |
+      Documentation assessment complete:
+      {{if adequate}}: Existing documentation is sufficient. Proceeding directly to PRD creation.
+      {{if inadequate}}: Running document-project to capture current system state before PRD.
+
+    document_project_to_pm: |
+      Project analysis complete. Key findings documented in:
+      - {{document_list}}
+      Use these findings to inform PRD creation and avoid re-analyzing the same aspects.
+
+    pm_to_architect_decision: |
+      PRD complete and saved as docs/prd.md. 
+      Architectural changes identified: {{yes/no}}
+      {{if yes}}: Proceeding to create architecture document for: {{specific_changes}}
+      {{if no}}: No architectural changes needed. Proceeding to validation.
+
+    architect_to_po: "Architecture complete. Save it as docs/architecture.md. Please validate all artifacts for integration safety."
+
+    po_to_sm: |
+      All artifacts validated. 
+      Documentation type available: {{sharded_prd / brownfield_docs}}
+      {{if sharded}}: Use standard create-next-story task.
+      {{if brownfield}}: Use create-brownfield-story task to handle varied documentation formats.
+
+    sm_story_creation: |
+      Creating story from {{documentation_type}}.
+      {{if missing_context}}: May need to gather additional context from user during story creation.
+
+    complete: "All planning artifacts validated and development can begin. Stories will be created based on available documentation format."