@marinjursic/prc-linux-arm64 0.1.0
This diff represents the content of publicly available package versions that have been released to one of the supported registries. The information contained in this diff is provided for informational purposes only and reflects changes between package versions as they appear in their respective public registries.
- package/LICENSE +21 -0
- package/README.md +3 -0
- package/bin/LICENSE +21 -0
- package/bin/README.md +335 -0
- package/bin/THIRD_PARTY_NOTICES.md +74 -0
- package/bin/adapters/checkov-v3.3.8.yaml +50 -0
- package/bin/adapters/gitleaks-v8.30.0.yaml +63 -0
- package/bin/adapters/grype-v0.116.1.yaml +58 -0
- package/bin/adapters/syft-v1.51.0.yaml +54 -0
- package/bin/catalog/assertions/core-repository.yaml +625 -0
- package/bin/catalog/assertions/iac.yaml +24 -0
- package/bin/catalog/assertions/supply-chain.yaml +45 -0
- package/bin/catalog/control-contracts.json +1 -0
- package/bin/catalog/control-id-registry.json +110470 -0
- package/bin/catalog/objectives/core-repository.yaml +243 -0
- package/bin/catalog/objectives/iac.yaml +13 -0
- package/bin/catalog/objectives/supply-chain.yaml +13 -0
- package/bin/catalog/profiles/api.yaml +12 -0
- package/bin/catalog/profiles/core-repository.yaml +49 -0
- package/bin/catalog/profiles/iac.yaml +18 -0
- package/bin/catalog/profiles/kubernetes.yaml +15 -0
- package/bin/catalog/profiles/quick.yaml +27 -0
- package/bin/catalog/profiles/supply-chain.yaml +20 -0
- package/bin/docs/architecture/adapters.md +380 -0
- package/bin/docs/architecture/agent-providers.md +188 -0
- package/bin/docs/architecture/applicability.md +80 -0
- package/bin/docs/architecture/catalog-integrity.md +85 -0
- package/bin/docs/architecture/evidence-and-results.md +154 -0
- package/bin/docs/architecture/execution-plans.md +61 -0
- package/bin/docs/architecture/product-contract.md +76 -0
- package/bin/docs/architecture/publisher-trust.md +68 -0
- package/bin/docs/architecture/remediation-contract.md +113 -0
- package/bin/docs/architecture/trust-model.md +95 -0
- package/bin/docs/assets/hero.svg +37 -0
- package/bin/docs/assets/logo.svg +13 -0
- package/bin/docs/assets/production-readiness-scan-demo-poster.png +0 -0
- package/bin/docs/assets/production-readiness-scan-demo.gif +0 -0
- package/bin/docs/assets/production-readiness-scan-demo.mp4 +0 -0
- package/bin/docs/assets/social-card.png +0 -0
- package/bin/docs/assets/social-card.svg +40 -0
- package/bin/docs/checklists/00-readiness-principle.md +17 -0
- package/bin/docs/checklists/01-release-foundations.md +91 -0
- package/bin/docs/checklists/02-product-risk-architecture.md +136 -0
- package/bin/docs/checklists/03-source-build-supply-chain.md +97 -0
- package/bin/docs/checklists/04-environments-quality-experience.md +226 -0
- package/bin/docs/checklists/05-application-security.md +320 -0
- package/bin/docs/checklists/06-data-privacy-performance.md +166 -0
- package/bin/docs/checklists/07-reliability-operations.md +355 -0
- package/bin/docs/checklists/08-maintenance-vendors-compliance.md +112 -0
- package/bin/docs/checklists/09-conditional-modules.md +229 -0
- package/bin/docs/checklists/10-evidence-and-decision.md +111 -0
- package/bin/docs/engineering/00-overview.md +51 -0
- package/bin/docs/engineering/01-governance-and-foundations.md +919 -0
- package/bin/docs/engineering/02-product-and-requirements.md +186 -0
- package/bin/docs/engineering/03-user-experience-web-and-content.md +1352 -0
- package/bin/docs/engineering/04-architecture-and-design.md +387 -0
- package/bin/docs/engineering/05-code-quality-and-implementation.md +1103 -0
- package/bin/docs/engineering/06-application-services-and-apis.md +476 -0
- package/bin/docs/engineering/07-data-and-information-lifecycle.md +1009 -0
- package/bin/docs/engineering/08-security-and-cryptography.md +1215 -0
- package/bin/docs/engineering/09-privacy-and-data-protection.md +205 -0
- package/bin/docs/engineering/10-verification-and-testing.md +841 -0
- package/bin/docs/engineering/11-developer-experience-platform-and-delivery.md +1013 -0
- package/bin/docs/engineering/12-operations-sre-and-support.md +795 -0
- package/bin/docs/engineering/13-documentation-and-knowledge.md +349 -0
- package/bin/docs/engineering/14-trust-safety-and-ecosystems.md +330 -0
- package/bin/docs/engineering/15-ai-ml-and-ai-assisted-development.md +785 -0
- package/bin/docs/engineering/16-specialized-domains-and-release-assurance.md +775 -0
- package/bin/docs/engineering/source-manifest.md +479 -0
- package/bin/docs/guides/ai-assisted-review.md +61 -0
- package/bin/docs/guides/getting-started.md +78 -0
- package/bin/docs/index.md +66 -0
- package/bin/docs/prompts/evidence-challenge.md +26 -0
- package/bin/docs/prompts/full-readiness-review.md +34 -0
- package/bin/docs/prompts/release-diff-review.md +31 -0
- package/bin/docs/records/evidence-record.md +42 -0
- package/bin/docs/records/go-no-go-decision.md +63 -0
- package/bin/docs/records/release-assessment.md +124 -0
- package/bin/docs/records/risk-exception.md +64 -0
- package/bin/docs/references.md +52 -0
- package/bin/docs/scanner/ai-control-review.md +208 -0
- package/bin/docs/scanner/benchmarks.md +122 -0
- package/bin/docs/scanner/cli-contract.md +130 -0
- package/bin/docs/scanner/configuration.md +101 -0
- package/bin/docs/scanner/control-contracts.md +47 -0
- package/bin/docs/scanner/core-repository.md +62 -0
- package/bin/docs/scanner/diff-and-invalidation.md +79 -0
- package/bin/docs/scanner/doctor.md +71 -0
- package/bin/docs/scanner/getting-started.md +355 -0
- package/bin/docs/scanner/go-http-timeouts.md +96 -0
- package/bin/docs/scanner/infrastructure-policy.md +64 -0
- package/bin/docs/scanner/kubernetes-workloads.md +63 -0
- package/bin/docs/scanner/mcp-agent-integration.md +138 -0
- package/bin/docs/scanner/openapi-contracts.md +75 -0
- package/bin/docs/scanner/private-key-armor.md +44 -0
- package/bin/docs/scanner/releases.md +160 -0
- package/bin/docs/scanner/remediation.md +273 -0
- package/bin/docs/scanner/risk-exceptions.md +52 -0
- package/bin/docs/scanner/security-walkthrough.md +236 -0
- package/bin/docs/scanner/state-and-history.md +113 -0
- package/bin/docs/scanner/supply-chain.md +132 -0
- package/bin/docs/scanner/test-discovery.md +60 -0
- package/bin/docs/stylesheets/extra.css +183 -0
- package/bin/fixtures/benchmarks/core-native/suite-comprehensive.yaml +302 -0
- package/bin/fixtures/benchmarks/core-native/suite.yaml +59 -0
- package/bin/fixtures/benchmarks/core-native/targets/baseline/README.md +3 -0
- package/bin/fixtures/benchmarks/core-native/targets/baseline/app.go +1 -0
- package/bin/fixtures/benchmarks/core-native/targets/conflict-template/app.js +5 -0
- package/bin/fixtures/benchmarks/core-native/targets/container-risky-template/Dockerfile +2 -0
- package/bin/fixtures/benchmarks/core-native/targets/container-valid/Dockerfile +2 -0
- package/bin/fixtures/benchmarks/core-native/targets/dependency-lock-missing/package.json +5 -0
- package/bin/fixtures/benchmarks/core-native/targets/dependency-lock-present/package-lock.json +6 -0
- package/bin/fixtures/benchmarks/core-native/targets/dependency-lock-present/package.json +5 -0
- package/bin/fixtures/benchmarks/core-native/targets/empty-manifest-template/package.json +1 -0
- package/bin/fixtures/benchmarks/core-native/targets/final-newline-template/app.py +1 -0
- package/bin/fixtures/benchmarks/core-native/targets/foundation-present/.github/CODEOWNERS +1 -0
- package/bin/fixtures/benchmarks/core-native/targets/foundation-present/.github/dependabot.yml +6 -0
- package/bin/fixtures/benchmarks/core-native/targets/foundation-present/.github/workflows/validate.yml +15 -0
- package/bin/fixtures/benchmarks/core-native/targets/foundation-present/CODE_OF_CONDUCT.md +3 -0
- package/bin/fixtures/benchmarks/core-native/targets/foundation-present/CONTRIBUTING.md +3 -0
- package/bin/fixtures/benchmarks/core-native/targets/foundation-present/LICENSE +1 -0
- package/bin/fixtures/benchmarks/core-native/targets/foundation-present/README.md +3 -0
- package/bin/fixtures/benchmarks/core-native/targets/foundation-present/SECURITY.md +3 -0
- package/bin/fixtures/benchmarks/core-native/targets/foundation-present/package-lock.json +6 -0
- package/bin/fixtures/benchmarks/core-native/targets/foundation-present/package.json +7 -0
- package/bin/fixtures/benchmarks/core-native/targets/foundation-present/tests/example.test.js +3 -0
- package/bin/fixtures/benchmarks/core-native/targets/go-http-server-timeout-risky-template/go.mod +3 -0
- package/bin/fixtures/benchmarks/core-native/targets/go-http-server-timeout-risky-template/server.go +18 -0
- package/bin/fixtures/benchmarks/core-native/targets/go-http-timeout-malformed-template/client.go +3 -0
- package/bin/fixtures/benchmarks/core-native/targets/go-http-timeout-malformed-template/go.mod +3 -0
- package/bin/fixtures/benchmarks/core-native/targets/go-http-timeout-risky-template/client.go +7 -0
- package/bin/fixtures/benchmarks/core-native/targets/go-http-timeout-risky-template/go.mod +3 -0
- package/bin/fixtures/benchmarks/core-native/targets/go-http-timeout-safe/client.go +22 -0
- package/bin/fixtures/benchmarks/core-native/targets/go-http-timeout-safe/go.mod +3 -0
- package/bin/fixtures/benchmarks/core-native/targets/go-http-timeout-safe/hazards_test.go +8 -0
- package/bin/fixtures/benchmarks/core-native/targets/kubernetes-risky-template/deployment.yaml +27 -0
- package/bin/fixtures/benchmarks/core-native/targets/kubernetes-valid/deployment.yaml +26 -0
- package/bin/fixtures/benchmarks/core-native/targets/openapi-operation-ids-risky-template/openapi.yaml +17 -0
- package/bin/fixtures/benchmarks/core-native/targets/openapi-operation-responses-risky-template/openapi.yaml +11 -0
- package/bin/fixtures/benchmarks/core-native/targets/openapi-root-malformed-template/openapi.yaml +5 -0
- package/bin/fixtures/benchmarks/core-native/targets/openapi-root-risky-template/openapi.yaml +5 -0
- package/bin/fixtures/benchmarks/core-native/targets/openapi-root-valid/openapi.yaml +17 -0
- package/bin/fixtures/benchmarks/core-native/targets/package-test-command/app.js +3 -0
- package/bin/fixtures/benchmarks/core-native/targets/package-test-command/package.json +7 -0
- package/bin/fixtures/benchmarks/core-native/targets/package-test-placeholder/app.js +3 -0
- package/bin/fixtures/benchmarks/core-native/targets/package-test-placeholder/package.json +7 -0
- package/bin/fixtures/benchmarks/core-native/targets/private-key-template/deploy.pem +3 -0
- package/bin/fixtures/benchmarks/core-native/targets/readme-missing/fixture.txt +1 -0
- package/bin/fixtures/benchmarks/core-native/targets/runtime-missing/package-lock.json +6 -0
- package/bin/fixtures/benchmarks/core-native/targets/runtime-missing/package.json +4 -0
- package/bin/fixtures/benchmarks/core-native/targets/terraform-locked/.terraform.lock.hcl +3 -0
- package/bin/fixtures/benchmarks/core-native/targets/terraform-locked/main.tf +7 -0
- package/bin/fixtures/benchmarks/core-native/targets/terraform-unlocked-template/.terraform.lock.hcl +3 -0
- package/bin/fixtures/benchmarks/core-native/targets/terraform-unlocked-template/main.tf +7 -0
- package/bin/fixtures/benchmarks/core-native/targets/test-declaration-valid/app.py +2 -0
- package/bin/fixtures/benchmarks/core-native/targets/test-declaration-valid/tests/test_app.py +5 -0
- package/bin/fixtures/benchmarks/core-native/targets/test-path-without-declaration/app.py +2 -0
- package/bin/fixtures/benchmarks/core-native/targets/test-path-without-declaration/tests/test_app.py +1 -0
- package/bin/fixtures/benchmarks/core-native/targets/workflow-malformed/.github/workflows/validate.yml +1 -0
- package/bin/fixtures/benchmarks/core-native/targets/workflow-no-jobs/.github/workflows/empty.yml +9 -0
- package/bin/fixtures/benchmarks/core-native/targets/workflow-risky/.github/workflows/risky.yml +10 -0
- package/bin/fixtures/benchmarks/core-native/targets/workflow-valid/.github/workflows/validate.yml +14 -0
- package/bin/packs/core-foundation.yaml +25 -0
- package/bin/packs/core-native.yaml +59 -0
- package/bin/prc +0 -0
- package/bin/schemas/adapter-execution-v0.1.schema.json +101 -0
- package/bin/schemas/adapter-execution-v0.2.schema.json +128 -0
- package/bin/schemas/adapter-execution.schema.json +145 -0
- package/bin/schemas/adapter-fixture-report.schema.json +59 -0
- package/bin/schemas/adapter-fixture-suite.schema.json +104 -0
- package/bin/schemas/adapter-manifest-v0.1.schema.json +55 -0
- package/bin/schemas/adapter-manifest-v0.2.schema.json +122 -0
- package/bin/schemas/adapter-manifest-v0.3.schema.json +172 -0
- package/bin/schemas/adapter-manifest.schema.json +299 -0
- package/bin/schemas/adapter-message.schema.json +136 -0
- package/bin/schemas/adapter-registry-report.schema.json +13 -0
- package/bin/schemas/adapter-registry.schema.json +47 -0
- package/bin/schemas/agent-execution-v0.1.schema.json +26 -0
- package/bin/schemas/agent-execution.schema.json +26 -0
- package/bin/schemas/agent-failure-v0.1.schema.json +102 -0
- package/bin/schemas/agent-failure.schema.json +102 -0
- package/bin/schemas/agent-output-v0.1.schema.json +36 -0
- package/bin/schemas/agent-output.schema.json +36 -0
- package/bin/schemas/agent-task-v0.1.schema.json +44 -0
- package/bin/schemas/agent-task.schema.json +46 -0
- package/bin/schemas/assertion-catalog.schema.json +69 -0
- package/bin/schemas/benchmark-report.schema.json +94 -0
- package/bin/schemas/benchmark-suite.schema.json +116 -0
- package/bin/schemas/catalog-bundle.schema.json +27 -0
- package/bin/schemas/catalog-manifest.schema.json +23 -0
- package/bin/schemas/checkov-iac-policy-report.schema.json +82 -0
- package/bin/schemas/control-contracts.schema.json +44 -0
- package/bin/schemas/control-review-output.schema.json +51 -0
- package/bin/schemas/doctor.schema.json +53 -0
- package/bin/schemas/evidence-v0.1.schema.json +21 -0
- package/bin/schemas/evidence.schema.json +21 -0
- package/bin/schemas/finding-v0.1.schema.json +70 -0
- package/bin/schemas/finding.schema.json +70 -0
- package/bin/schemas/fix-contract-v0.1.schema.json +35 -0
- package/bin/schemas/fix-contract-v0.2.schema.json +46 -0
- package/bin/schemas/fix-contract-v0.3.schema.json +49 -0
- package/bin/schemas/fix-contract.schema.json +49 -0
- package/bin/schemas/grype-vulnerability-report.schema.json +88 -0
- package/bin/schemas/history.schema.json +37 -0
- package/bin/schemas/invalidation.schema.json +86 -0
- package/bin/schemas/inventory-v0.1.schema.json +42 -0
- package/bin/schemas/inventory-v0.2.schema.json +95 -0
- package/bin/schemas/inventory-v0.3.schema.json +139 -0
- package/bin/schemas/inventory.schema.json +139 -0
- package/bin/schemas/objective-catalog.schema.json +62 -0
- package/bin/schemas/pack-report.schema.json +16 -0
- package/bin/schemas/pack.schema.json +53 -0
- package/bin/schemas/plan-v0.1.schema.json +31 -0
- package/bin/schemas/plan-v0.2.schema.json +32 -0
- package/bin/schemas/plan-v0.3.schema.json +44 -0
- package/bin/schemas/plan-v0.4.schema.json +48 -0
- package/bin/schemas/plan-v0.5.schema.json +49 -0
- package/bin/schemas/plan-v0.6.schema.json +137 -0
- package/bin/schemas/plan.schema.json +137 -0
- package/bin/schemas/profile.schema.json +42 -0
- package/bin/schemas/project-config.schema.json +128 -0
- package/bin/schemas/release-manifest-v0.1.schema.json +86 -0
- package/bin/schemas/release-manifest-v0.2.schema.json +146 -0
- package/bin/schemas/release-manifest-v0.3.schema.json +146 -0
- package/bin/schemas/release-manifest.schema.json +6 -0
- package/bin/schemas/remediation-candidate-v0.1.schema.json +51 -0
- package/bin/schemas/remediation-candidate-v0.2.schema.json +51 -0
- package/bin/schemas/remediation-candidate-v0.3.schema.json +51 -0
- package/bin/schemas/remediation-candidate-v0.4.schema.json +69 -0
- package/bin/schemas/remediation-candidate.schema.json +69 -0
- package/bin/schemas/remediation-run-v0.1.schema.json +69 -0
- package/bin/schemas/remediation-run-v0.2.schema.json +78 -0
- package/bin/schemas/remediation-run-v0.3.schema.json +86 -0
- package/bin/schemas/remediation-run-v0.4.schema.json +86 -0
- package/bin/schemas/remediation-run-v0.5.schema.json +131 -0
- package/bin/schemas/remediation-run-v0.6.schema.json +143 -0
- package/bin/schemas/remediation-run-v0.7.schema.json +160 -0
- package/bin/schemas/remediation-run-v0.8.schema.json +161 -0
- package/bin/schemas/remediation-run.schema.json +161 -0
- package/bin/schemas/risk-exception-verification.schema.json +17 -0
- package/bin/schemas/risk-exception.schema.json +137 -0
- package/bin/schemas/run-result-v0.1.schema.json +54 -0
- package/bin/schemas/run-result-v0.10.schema.json +64 -0
- package/bin/schemas/run-result-v0.11.schema.json +146 -0
- package/bin/schemas/run-result-v0.2.schema.json +60 -0
- package/bin/schemas/run-result-v0.3.schema.json +52 -0
- package/bin/schemas/run-result-v0.4.schema.json +52 -0
- package/bin/schemas/run-result-v0.5.schema.json +60 -0
- package/bin/schemas/run-result-v0.6.schema.json +61 -0
- package/bin/schemas/run-result-v0.7.schema.json +61 -0
- package/bin/schemas/run-result-v0.8.schema.json +61 -0
- package/bin/schemas/run-result-v0.9.schema.json +77 -0
- package/bin/schemas/run-result.schema.json +165 -0
- package/bin/schemas/signature-verification.schema.json +22 -0
- package/bin/schemas/signature.schema.json +18 -0
- package/bin/schemas/state-check-v0.1.schema.json +27 -0
- package/bin/schemas/state-check.schema.json +28 -0
- package/bin/schemas/trust-store.schema.json +50 -0
- package/bin/schemas/verification-execution-v0.1.schema.json +105 -0
- package/bin/schemas/verification-execution.schema.json +105 -0
- package/bin/schemas/version-v0.1.schema.json +27 -0
- package/bin/schemas/version.schema.json +27 -0
- package/manifest.json +9 -0
- package/package.json +28 -0
|
@@ -0,0 +1,1013 @@
|
|
|
1
|
+
# Developer experience, platform, and delivery
|
|
2
|
+
|
|
3
|
+
_Phase 11 of 16 in the [complete engineering review](00-overview.md)._
|
|
4
|
+
|
|
5
|
+
Developer flow, platform engineering, engineering economics, source control, CI/CD, trusted builds, infrastructure as code, and progressive delivery.
|
|
6
|
+
|
|
7
|
+
Assess every control as **Pass**, **Fail**, **Blocked**, or **Not Applicable**. A Pass needs current evidence for the exact product, revision, artifact, configuration, environment, and data state under review.
|
|
8
|
+
|
|
9
|
+
## Source Control and Change Management
|
|
10
|
+
|
|
11
|
+
_Consolidated from `quality standards/12-delivery-cicd/01-source-control-and-change-management.md`; 9 non-duplicative controls._
|
|
12
|
+
|
|
13
|
+
### Universal controls
|
|
14
|
+
|
|
15
|
+
- [ ] **USEQ-836D2261** — Repository access uses individual identities, strong authentication, and least privilege.
|
|
16
|
+
- [ ] **USEQ-3D3EF3D3** — Material changes require independent review; critical areas require designated reviewers.
|
|
17
|
+
- [ ] **USEQ-0BBDD49A** — Administrative review bypass cannot occur silently.
|
|
18
|
+
- [ ] **USEQ-4B76B0C6** — Merge requirements include all required automated checks.
|
|
19
|
+
- [ ] **USEQ-2163B1AC** — Security-sensitive, infrastructure, pipeline, authorization, cryptography, payment, and migration changes receive heightened review.
|
|
20
|
+
- [ ] **USEQ-32DAA868** — Generated code has a trusted source and reproducible regeneration process.
|
|
21
|
+
- [ ] **USEQ-2C510B3A** — Emergency changes use a documented break-glass process and receive retrospective review.
|
|
22
|
+
- [ ] **USEQ-AE4E848F** — Repository backup and recovery are tested.
|
|
23
|
+
- [ ] **USEQ-3560AE8E** — Repository webhooks, applications, bots, and deploy keys are inventoried and restricted.
|
|
24
|
+
|
|
25
|
+
## Build, CI/CD, and Artifact Integrity
|
|
26
|
+
|
|
27
|
+
_Consolidated from `quality standards/12-delivery-cicd/02-build-cicd-and-artifact-integrity.md`; 11 non-duplicative controls._
|
|
28
|
+
|
|
29
|
+
### Universal controls
|
|
30
|
+
|
|
31
|
+
- [ ] **USEQ-394F34E8** — Builds run automatically from reviewed source and are repeatable from declared inputs.
|
|
32
|
+
- [ ] **USEQ-D1076D92** — Dependency versions and build inputs are pinned sufficiently to prevent unexpected substitution.
|
|
33
|
+
- [ ] **USEQ-267DAD35** — The production artifact is built once and promoted rather than independently rebuilt per environment.
|
|
34
|
+
- [ ] **USEQ-3381F5D0** — Deployable artifacts are immutable and have cryptographic digests.
|
|
35
|
+
- [ ] **USEQ-2F6AA097** — Build provenance records source, builder, inputs, workflow, time, and output digest.
|
|
36
|
+
- [ ] **USEQ-4480E17F** — Build and signing identities use least privilege; keys are protected outside source and output.
|
|
37
|
+
- [ ] **USEQ-73488048** — Untrusted contribution workflows cannot access production secrets or overwrite trusted artifacts.
|
|
38
|
+
- [ ] **USEQ-A0338698** — Failed or canceled checks cannot be represented as passed.
|
|
39
|
+
- [ ] **USEQ-4C73564C** — Previous known-good artifacts remain available.
|
|
40
|
+
- [ ] **USEQ-7112CE32** — Build logs and caches do not expose secrets, sensitive source, or unverified cross-trust artifacts.
|
|
41
|
+
- [ ] **USEQ-D4ABAEAF** — Build-platform compromise has containment and recovery procedures.
|
|
42
|
+
|
|
43
|
+
## Environments, Configuration, Feature Flags, and Secrets
|
|
44
|
+
|
|
45
|
+
_Consolidated from `quality standards/12-delivery-cicd/03-environments-configuration-flags-and-secrets.md`; 24 non-duplicative controls._
|
|
46
|
+
|
|
47
|
+
### Environment separation
|
|
48
|
+
|
|
49
|
+
- [ ] **USEQ-9ED6000B** — Production credentials do not work outside production; non-production users cannot reach production control planes.
|
|
50
|
+
- [ ] **USEQ-23C9AA06** — Test accounts, bypasses, simulators, debug endpoints, and development consoles are absent or inaccessible in production.
|
|
51
|
+
- [ ] **USEQ-DAC810AD** — Non-production email, payment, notifications, and webhooks cannot affect real users or systems accidentally.
|
|
52
|
+
- [ ] **USEQ-AF8234B1** — Environment boundaries are documented, tested, logged, and periodically reviewed.
|
|
53
|
+
|
|
54
|
+
### Configuration
|
|
55
|
+
|
|
56
|
+
- [ ] **USEQ-7A52E01F** — Configuration is versioned or otherwise auditable and changes require review.
|
|
57
|
+
- [ ] **USEQ-447535A7** — Secure defaults and explicit environment-specific values are used.
|
|
58
|
+
- [ ] **USEQ-5E325DC6** — Production configuration can be reconstructed and rolled back.
|
|
59
|
+
- [ ] **USEQ-294721C4** — Debug mode, verbose exceptions, profiling, test routes, and development consoles are disabled or restricted.
|
|
60
|
+
- [ ] **USEQ-B66A3064** — Time zones, locales, encodings, units, time synchronization, resource limits, and timeouts are explicit.
|
|
61
|
+
- [ ] **USEQ-6A62F162** — Source maps and diagnostic artifacts do not expose secrets or inappropriate internal information.
|
|
62
|
+
- [ ] **USEQ-DE280DA4** — Configuration ownership, review dates, emergency changes, and approvals are recorded.
|
|
63
|
+
|
|
64
|
+
### Feature flags
|
|
65
|
+
|
|
66
|
+
- [ ] **USEQ-3E50B6BE** — Every flag has an owner, purpose, default state, and removal date where temporary.
|
|
67
|
+
- [ ] **USEQ-7BDEFE8A** — Flag-service failure produces safe behavior.
|
|
68
|
+
- [ ] **USEQ-ADCFB9BE** — High-impact flag changes are restricted and audited.
|
|
69
|
+
- [ ] **USEQ-002EFF2A** — High-risk new functionality has a kill switch where appropriate.
|
|
70
|
+
- [ ] **USEQ-98C06345** — Untrusted clients cannot manipulate flags to bypass controls.
|
|
71
|
+
|
|
72
|
+
### Secrets
|
|
73
|
+
|
|
74
|
+
- [ ] **USEQ-A088A7BA** — Secrets do not appear in source, artifacts, frontend bundles, logs, tickets, documentation, chat, or analytics.
|
|
75
|
+
- [ ] **USEQ-DDA7DCA9** — Least privilege and short-lived credentials are used where possible.
|
|
76
|
+
- [ ] **USEQ-5970F4E7** — Secret retrieval and use are audited where practical.
|
|
77
|
+
- [ ] **USEQ-F341514B** — Rotation and emergency revocation are tested.
|
|
78
|
+
- [ ] **USEQ-402D416B** — Expiry and rotation failures are monitored.
|
|
79
|
+
- [ ] **USEQ-2CE27D9F** — Backup and recovery preserve or securely reconstruct required secrets.
|
|
80
|
+
- [ ] **USEQ-BF6C9A29** — Break-glass credentials are protected, monitored, and tested.
|
|
81
|
+
- [ ] **USEQ-24DBEE2F** — Historical secret exposure is addressed by rotation or revocation, not merely deletion.
|
|
82
|
+
|
|
83
|
+
## Continuous Integration
|
|
84
|
+
|
|
85
|
+
_Consolidated from `quality standards/12-delivery-cicd/04-continuous-integration.md`; 20 non-duplicative controls._
|
|
86
|
+
|
|
87
|
+
### Category-specific universal rules
|
|
88
|
+
|
|
89
|
+
- [ ] **USEQ-69535E01** — Integrate small complete changes frequently rather than allowing long-lived divergence.
|
|
90
|
+
- [ ] **USEQ-782703AC** — Keep the authoritative branch releasable or restore it promptly when a gate fails.
|
|
91
|
+
- [ ] **USEQ-0B41367E** — Require review and required checks before protected-branch change.
|
|
92
|
+
- [ ] **USEQ-7B40E59A** — Use one trusted pipeline definition under the same change control as source.
|
|
93
|
+
- [ ] **USEQ-8CA318E4** — Run builds and tests from clean, declared inputs.
|
|
94
|
+
- [ ] **USEQ-8574E516** — Fail closed when mandatory checks cannot run or produce ambiguous status.
|
|
95
|
+
- [ ] **USEQ-D8198F66** — Separate trusted branch and release jobs from untrusted contribution contexts.
|
|
96
|
+
- [ ] **USEQ-E3F935AB** — Prevent untrusted jobs from accessing secrets, signing material, deployment rights, or mutable trusted caches.
|
|
97
|
+
- [ ] **USEQ-CB522CDF** — Run fast high-signal checks early and broader risk-based checks before acceptance.
|
|
98
|
+
- [ ] **USEQ-007A0FED** — Verify formatting, compilation, static analysis, unit tests, contracts, secrets, dependencies, policy, and packaging as applicable.
|
|
99
|
+
- [ ] **USEQ-BAE610E4** — Make check output diagnostic and link failures to evidence.
|
|
100
|
+
- [ ] **USEQ-3B38BEB9** — Track flaky tests, unstable infrastructure, and long queue time as integration defects.
|
|
101
|
+
- [ ] **USEQ-F97BCD7F** — Avoid rerunning failed jobs until they pass without understanding the cause.
|
|
102
|
+
- [ ] **USEQ-F4D6E3B3** — Pin toolchain, action, plugin, and dependency versions sufficiently for trustworthy results.
|
|
103
|
+
- [ ] **USEQ-E307C67C** — Use isolated workspaces and clean up credentials and artifacts after each run.
|
|
104
|
+
- [ ] **USEQ-37F01160** — Make generated files reproducible and detect uncommitted or stale generation.
|
|
105
|
+
- [ ] **USEQ-609408D4** — Prevent merge queues from accepting a combination never tested together.
|
|
106
|
+
- [ ] **USEQ-FF347E02** — Record source revision, pipeline version, inputs, environment, and artifacts for each result.
|
|
107
|
+
- [ ] **USEQ-B022185A** — Monitor lead time, failure rate, recovery time, queue time, and feedback latency without using them as individual performance scores.
|
|
108
|
+
- [ ] **USEQ-A0BC4022** — Exercise the pipeline's ability to reject deliberately broken, vulnerable, or unsigned changes.
|
|
109
|
+
|
|
110
|
+
## Continuous Delivery and Deployment
|
|
111
|
+
|
|
112
|
+
_Consolidated from `quality standards/12-delivery-cicd/05-continuous-delivery-and-deployment.md`; 20 non-duplicative controls._
|
|
113
|
+
|
|
114
|
+
### Category-specific universal rules
|
|
115
|
+
|
|
116
|
+
- [ ] **USEQ-8DA2AF16** — Build a release artifact once and promote the identical immutable artifact through environments.
|
|
117
|
+
- [ ] **USEQ-517E9DBD** — Separate artifact creation from deployment authorization.
|
|
118
|
+
- [ ] **USEQ-5FBAC758** — Verify provenance, signature, digest, policy, and environment eligibility before promotion.
|
|
119
|
+
- [ ] **USEQ-455A9A23** — Use least-privilege deployment identities scoped to intended targets.
|
|
120
|
+
- [ ] **USEQ-E2718EA6** — Store deployment definitions, configuration references, and policy as reviewed versioned artifacts.
|
|
121
|
+
- [ ] **USEQ-20FFD65B** — Require explicit approval where risk, law, contract, or segregation of duties demands it.
|
|
122
|
+
- [ ] **USEQ-F987D323** — Make automated approvals evidence-based and auditable.
|
|
123
|
+
- [ ] **USEQ-82AC6F44** — Use progressive exposure and health gates proportionate to blast radius.
|
|
124
|
+
- [ ] **USEQ-BC77A748** — Validate user-facing success, business integrity, latency, errors, saturation, security, and dependency health during rollout.
|
|
125
|
+
- [ ] **USEQ-D63DD56F** — Pause or roll back automatically or operationally when predefined thresholds fail.
|
|
126
|
+
- [ ] **USEQ-1510AAE1** — Keep previous known-good artifacts and configuration available.
|
|
127
|
+
- [ ] **USEQ-E09E9C8D** — Test rollback and safe roll-forward, including data and event compatibility.
|
|
128
|
+
- [ ] **USEQ-61A0F909** — Prevent deployment when required evidence is stale, missing, or tied to another artifact.
|
|
129
|
+
- [ ] **USEQ-79029B47** — Serialize or coordinate changes that cannot safely overlap.
|
|
130
|
+
- [ ] **USEQ-98255DC6** — Make deployment idempotent and resumable after interruption.
|
|
131
|
+
- [ ] **USEQ-C3E713ED** — Record who or what authorized, initiated, changed, verified, paused, and completed the deployment.
|
|
132
|
+
- [ ] **USEQ-913347A6** — Prevent direct production mutation outside controlled emergency procedures.
|
|
133
|
+
- [ ] **USEQ-BE458954** — Test emergency release paths without normalizing bypass.
|
|
134
|
+
- [ ] **USEQ-5A5B48C9** — Separate environment secrets and trust relationships.
|
|
135
|
+
- [ ] **USEQ-44042363** — Measure deployment outcomes and improve the system after failures and near misses.
|
|
136
|
+
|
|
137
|
+
## Reproducible, Hermetic, and Trusted Builds
|
|
138
|
+
|
|
139
|
+
_Consolidated from `quality standards/12-delivery-cicd/06-reproducible-hermetic-and-trusted-builds.md`; 20 non-duplicative controls._
|
|
140
|
+
|
|
141
|
+
### Category-specific universal rules
|
|
142
|
+
|
|
143
|
+
- [ ] **USEQ-8555A412** — Declare source, dependencies, toolchain, environment, configuration, and build parameters as explicit inputs.
|
|
144
|
+
- [ ] **USEQ-E9C8C459** — Pin mutable inputs or verify them cryptographically.
|
|
145
|
+
- [ ] **USEQ-907EC8FF** — Restrict undeclared network access during trusted builds where practical.
|
|
146
|
+
- [ ] **USEQ-DED09248** — Use clean isolated builders and prevent cross-tenant or cross-trust contamination.
|
|
147
|
+
- [ ] **USEQ-1D16BCDA** — Make locale, time zone, timestamps, file order, random seeds, and environment influence deterministic or recorded.
|
|
148
|
+
- [ ] **USEQ-269DB62C** — Separate build-time secrets from output and prevent them from entering artifacts or logs.
|
|
149
|
+
- [ ] **USEQ-F73B5A06** — Use minimum build permissions and short-lived credentials.
|
|
150
|
+
- [ ] **USEQ-4B359B84** — Prevent source from modifying trusted builder policy or accessing unrelated release secrets.
|
|
151
|
+
- [ ] **USEQ-2A35153B** — Generate immutable output digests and machine-verifiable provenance.
|
|
152
|
+
- [ ] **USEQ-BE8EF1D3** — Rebuild independently and compare outputs or meaningful normalized content for high-assurance releases.
|
|
153
|
+
- [ ] **USEQ-B910BD14** — Detect generated content that differs from checked-in or declared source.
|
|
154
|
+
- [ ] **USEQ-D60E6950** — Verify final packages contain only intended files, permissions, metadata, and dependencies.
|
|
155
|
+
- [ ] **USEQ-37514564** — Scan and inspect the final artifact, not only its source inputs.
|
|
156
|
+
- [ ] **USEQ-48587D52** — Sign artifacts only after required verification succeeds.
|
|
157
|
+
- [ ] **USEQ-587FE097** — Protect signing keys and separate signing authority from untrusted build execution.
|
|
158
|
+
- [ ] **USEQ-C33F05AA** — Retain builders, inputs, provenance, artifacts, and logs for incident investigation.
|
|
159
|
+
- [ ] **USEQ-1A4ABD7D** — Maintain a clean-room rebuild procedure after suspected compromise.
|
|
160
|
+
- [ ] **USEQ-764FB544** — Rotate and revoke signing identity and redistribute corrected artifacts when necessary.
|
|
161
|
+
- [ ] **USEQ-6B385742** — Test reproducibility after toolchain and platform updates.
|
|
162
|
+
- [ ] **USEQ-FC20FB0F** — Document remaining nondeterminism and why it does not undermine trust.
|
|
163
|
+
|
|
164
|
+
## Infrastructure as Code and Environment Engineering
|
|
165
|
+
|
|
166
|
+
_Consolidated from `quality standards/12-delivery-cicd/07-infrastructure-as-code-and-environment-engineering.md`; 20 non-duplicative controls._
|
|
167
|
+
|
|
168
|
+
### Category-specific universal rules
|
|
169
|
+
|
|
170
|
+
- [ ] **USEQ-E4DC3BC6** — Represent material infrastructure, policy, networking, identity, observability, storage, and deployment configuration as versioned code or equivalent declarative records.
|
|
171
|
+
- [ ] **USEQ-F53D21B2** — Apply review, protected branches, traceability, testing, and release controls to infrastructure changes.
|
|
172
|
+
- [ ] **USEQ-9F1306DB** — Separate reusable modules from environment-specific composition.
|
|
173
|
+
- [ ] **USEQ-FC258A07** — Define secure defaults and prohibit dangerous options through policy where practical.
|
|
174
|
+
- [ ] **USEQ-59037C06** — Validate syntax, types, references, policy, cost, security, and destructive impact before apply.
|
|
175
|
+
- [ ] **USEQ-E0C505B4** — Generate a change plan and require human review for high-impact or destructive differences.
|
|
176
|
+
- [ ] **USEQ-AAC85EFD** — Use least-privilege automation identities and avoid shared administrator credentials.
|
|
177
|
+
- [ ] **USEQ-595C5316** — Keep secrets out of source and state files; protect state as sensitive production data.
|
|
178
|
+
- [ ] **USEQ-A4FA3E49** — Detect and reconcile unauthorized or manual drift.
|
|
179
|
+
- [ ] **USEQ-7EA84BA2** — Make creation, update, replacement, scaling, failover, and destruction idempotent where possible.
|
|
180
|
+
- [ ] **USEQ-73830565** — Protect critical resources against accidental deletion and uncontrolled replacement.
|
|
181
|
+
- [ ] **USEQ-5617B518** — Version and migrate state safely.
|
|
182
|
+
- [ ] **USEQ-506A79E0** — Test modules and complete environments in isolated accounts or namespaces.
|
|
183
|
+
- [ ] **USEQ-3AFFAE81** — Reconstruct an environment from source, artifacts, configuration, data recovery, and documented external prerequisites.
|
|
184
|
+
- [ ] **USEQ-47EDD512** — Record provider defaults and implicit resources that code does not create.
|
|
185
|
+
- [ ] **USEQ-CFDDFBBF** — Define import and ownership procedures for existing resources.
|
|
186
|
+
- [ ] **USEQ-FCC3E68C** — Coordinate changes across application, schema, network, identity, and observability dependencies.
|
|
187
|
+
- [ ] **USEQ-632F6BEB** — Plan for provider API deprecation and module lifecycle.
|
|
188
|
+
- [ ] **USEQ-6A024846** — Measure provisioning time, drift, failed changes, rollback, policy violations, and orphaned resources.
|
|
189
|
+
- [ ] **USEQ-17F99C8E** — Exercise disaster recovery without relying on inaccessible production control planes.
|
|
190
|
+
|
|
191
|
+
## Deployment Strategies and Progressive Delivery
|
|
192
|
+
|
|
193
|
+
_Consolidated from `quality standards/12-delivery-cicd/08-deployment-strategies-and-progressive-delivery.md`; 20 non-duplicative controls._
|
|
194
|
+
|
|
195
|
+
### Category-specific universal rules
|
|
196
|
+
|
|
197
|
+
- [ ] **USEQ-80674A43** — Choose rolling, canary, blue-green, cohort, shadow, parallel, regional, or other strategies according to risk and state compatibility.
|
|
198
|
+
- [ ] **USEQ-92842952** — Define the smallest safe initial exposure and an explicit expansion sequence.
|
|
199
|
+
- [ ] **USEQ-2A0FF5B4** — Ensure cohorts are representative enough to reveal relevant failures.
|
|
200
|
+
- [ ] **USEQ-FDF15AD0** — Keep control and treatment populations comparable when using comparative gates.
|
|
201
|
+
- [ ] **USEQ-4896CCAE** — Separate code deployment, feature exposure, data migration, and customer communication when decoupling reduces risk.
|
|
202
|
+
- [ ] **USEQ-DC837F09** — Define stop, hold, rollback, roll-forward, incident, and communication thresholds before launch.
|
|
203
|
+
- [ ] **USEQ-203A1CDD** — Verify old and new versions can coexist with schemas, messages, caches, sessions, and clients.
|
|
204
|
+
- [ ] **USEQ-AED1FAFC** — Prevent one-way data changes from making rollback appear available when it is not.
|
|
205
|
+
- [ ] **USEQ-906DDAA4** — Warm capacity, caches, connections, and dependencies before traffic shift where needed.
|
|
206
|
+
- [ ] **USEQ-5554C95B** — Drain and terminate old versions safely after in-flight work completes or transfers.
|
|
207
|
+
- [ ] **USEQ-C8FC60DB** — Observe user success, business integrity, latency, errors, saturation, dependency health, security, and support demand.
|
|
208
|
+
- [ ] **USEQ-AEFC8DCA** — Account for delayed effects, background work, billing cycles, data pipelines, and long-lived sessions before expansion.
|
|
209
|
+
- [ ] **USEQ-722D65DC** — Prevent automatic rollout from outrunning observability or human response.
|
|
210
|
+
- [ ] **USEQ-A66E17A6** — Use kill switches for high-risk behavior, but test them and keep defaults safe.
|
|
211
|
+
- [ ] **USEQ-FD5F6635** — Keep deployment and feature state visible in incident telemetry.
|
|
212
|
+
- [ ] **USEQ-33B2FE53** — Verify traffic routing, stickiness, failover, and health-check semantics.
|
|
213
|
+
- [ ] **USEQ-993B7855** — Test reverse traffic shift and cleanup before launch.
|
|
214
|
+
- [ ] **USEQ-2CFDB0CB** — Record every exposure change and decision rationale.
|
|
215
|
+
- [ ] **USEQ-FFB58250** — Define when the rollout is complete and temporary infrastructure can be removed.
|
|
216
|
+
- [ ] **USEQ-AF20E3D9** — Conduct a review when rollout gates fail or produce unexplained anomalies.
|
|
217
|
+
|
|
218
|
+
## Database and Data Release Engineering
|
|
219
|
+
|
|
220
|
+
_Consolidated from `quality standards/12-delivery-cicd/09-database-and-data-release-engineering.md`; 20 non-duplicative controls._
|
|
221
|
+
|
|
222
|
+
### Category-specific universal rules
|
|
223
|
+
|
|
224
|
+
- [ ] **USEQ-3F4E7A24** — Version every schema, migration, data transform, permission, index, and pipeline change.
|
|
225
|
+
- [ ] **USEQ-A97FB4A9** — Analyze application, worker, report, export, cache, search, integration, and rollback compatibility.
|
|
226
|
+
- [ ] **USEQ-29E45716** — Use staged compatible changes when versions coexist.
|
|
227
|
+
- [ ] **USEQ-11851D0A** — Run destructive or long migrations separately from application deployment when separation reduces risk.
|
|
228
|
+
- [ ] **USEQ-D7A998B9** — Estimate duration, locks, I/O, storage, log, replication, and downstream impact using representative data.
|
|
229
|
+
- [ ] **USEQ-1F838C1D** — Validate preconditions and stop on unexpected state.
|
|
230
|
+
- [ ] **USEQ-8C9DCBEF** — Take a verified recovery point before irreversible change.
|
|
231
|
+
- [ ] **USEQ-EEB2E713** — Make migrations idempotent, resumable, observable, and safe under retry.
|
|
232
|
+
- [ ] **USEQ-A69FE821** — Throttle and checkpoint long-running changes.
|
|
233
|
+
- [ ] **USEQ-ADDBE0D0** — Monitor locks, errors, lag, throughput, capacity, queue growth, and user impact.
|
|
234
|
+
- [ ] **USEQ-1612BF52** — Verify counts, checksums, constraints, totals, samples, and business invariants.
|
|
235
|
+
- [ ] **USEQ-48E8D418** — Prevent old code from writing data incompatible with the new representation.
|
|
236
|
+
- [ ] **USEQ-33DC8C50** — Keep old fields and indexes until consumers and rollback windows are complete.
|
|
237
|
+
- [ ] **USEQ-D692F341** — Define safe rollback or explicit roll-forward when data cannot be reversed.
|
|
238
|
+
- [ ] **USEQ-B18B8ADB** — Reconcile dual writes and backfills continuously.
|
|
239
|
+
- [ ] **USEQ-FC5FCD6B** — Review and audit manual corrections.
|
|
240
|
+
- [ ] **USEQ-64F2139F** — Protect retention, deletion, consent, residency, and legal-hold semantics during migration.
|
|
241
|
+
- [ ] **USEQ-22A52F1C** — Test restored backups against the new application and schema.
|
|
242
|
+
- [ ] **USEQ-5C9EF78B** — Remove temporary elevated permissions and migration infrastructure.
|
|
243
|
+
- [ ] **USEQ-89C3CCB0** — Record exact migration version, operator, start, end, outcome, and evidence.
|
|
244
|
+
|
|
245
|
+
## Rollback, Roll-Forward, and Kill Switches
|
|
246
|
+
|
|
247
|
+
_Consolidated from `quality standards/12-delivery-cicd/10-rollback-rollforward-and-kill-switches.md`; 20 non-duplicative controls._
|
|
248
|
+
|
|
249
|
+
### Category-specific universal rules
|
|
250
|
+
|
|
251
|
+
- [ ] **USEQ-D9F7262D** — Define which changes can be rolled back, which require roll-forward, and which require data restoration or reconciliation.
|
|
252
|
+
- [ ] **USEQ-2F23054A** — Keep previous trusted application, infrastructure, configuration, and policy artifacts available.
|
|
253
|
+
- [ ] **USEQ-52FBF8D0** — Test rollback using the same automation and permissions used in production.
|
|
254
|
+
- [ ] **USEQ-B540AC6B** — Ensure schema, messages, sessions, caches, files, and external side effects remain compatible with rollback.
|
|
255
|
+
- [ ] **USEQ-92B08EA4** — Avoid destructive data change before the rollback window closes unless risk is explicitly accepted.
|
|
256
|
+
- [ ] **USEQ-2B807409** — Define rollback triggers based on user impact and integrity, not only technical health.
|
|
257
|
+
- [ ] **USEQ-66FE3634** — Make rollback authority and initiation paths available during an incident.
|
|
258
|
+
- [ ] **USEQ-3264C430** — Ensure rollback does not repeat charges, notifications, jobs, exports, or other side effects.
|
|
259
|
+
- [ ] **USEQ-EB2A1C1A** — Reconcile data written by the failed version.
|
|
260
|
+
- [ ] **USEQ-36BF8E85** — Use kill switches for isolated risky behavior and define safe failure when the flag system is unavailable.
|
|
261
|
+
- [ ] **USEQ-24436BCA** — Restrict and audit kill-switch access.
|
|
262
|
+
- [ ] **USEQ-CE7FB317** — Test kill switches in production-like conditions and periodically in production-safe drills.
|
|
263
|
+
- [ ] **USEQ-F343F4EA** — Prevent stale clients, workers, and long-lived connections from continuing disabled behavior.
|
|
264
|
+
- [ ] **USEQ-C708B71B** — Make configuration and feature state visible to responders.
|
|
265
|
+
- [ ] **USEQ-6C422A58** — Define recovery from a bad configuration separately from bad code.
|
|
266
|
+
- [ ] **USEQ-2CA6BC3B** — Use roll-forward when reverting would violate data or protocol compatibility.
|
|
267
|
+
- [ ] **USEQ-059BE10D** — Verify user journeys and business invariants after containment.
|
|
268
|
+
- [ ] **USEQ-C98A9821** — Communicate rollback effects to support and customers where material.
|
|
269
|
+
- [ ] **USEQ-05EB12CC** — Remove temporary rollback compatibility and emergency flags after stability is established.
|
|
270
|
+
- [ ] **USEQ-1A767899** — Capture lessons from every rollback or emergency disablement.
|
|
271
|
+
|
|
272
|
+
## Developer Experience, Platform Engineering, and Engineering Economics Master Checklist
|
|
273
|
+
|
|
274
|
+
_Consolidated from `gap supplement/03-developer-experience-platform-engineering-and-economics.md`; 203 non-duplicative controls._
|
|
275
|
+
|
|
276
|
+
### Expanded gap-closure controls
|
|
277
|
+
|
|
278
|
+
#### Developer experience as an engineering-system outcome
|
|
279
|
+
|
|
280
|
+
- [ ] **USEQ-9DFE53B9** — Treat developer experience as the ability of people to understand, change, verify, deliver, operate, and retire software safely and effectively.
|
|
281
|
+
- [ ] **USEQ-E834F54B** — Assign accountable ownership for developer experience across team boundaries rather than treating it as an informal tooling concern.
|
|
282
|
+
- [ ] **USEQ-41F60C9D** — Measure developer experience through multiple dimensions including feedback loops, cognitive load, flow, satisfaction, collaboration, quality, and delivery outcomes.
|
|
283
|
+
- [ ] **USEQ-DE7FAAF5** — Segment findings by role, tenure, product area, location, accessibility needs, and workflow without exposing individuals or creating unsafe comparisons.
|
|
284
|
+
- [ ] **USEQ-8AC9F599** — Use qualitative research, workflow observation, support demand, incident evidence, and tool telemetry together rather than relying on one survey or metric.
|
|
285
|
+
- [ ] **USEQ-E3C0E730** — Prioritize improvements by repeated friction, risk, time lost, error probability, interruption cost, and impact on user outcomes.
|
|
286
|
+
- [ ] **USEQ-C8FCDEDB** — Publish the engineering-system roadmap, service ownership, supported workflows, known limitations, and ways to request improvement.
|
|
287
|
+
- [ ] **USEQ-496042E7** — Treat internal developers, operators, data practitioners, security teams, and automated agents as distinct platform users with different needs and permissions.
|
|
288
|
+
- [ ] **USEQ-351D0CF1** — Include accessibility and inclusive design in internal tools, documentation, terminals, dashboards, portals, development environments, and support processes.
|
|
289
|
+
- [ ] **USEQ-C9B06FE8** — Prevent local heroics and undocumented workarounds from being accepted as evidence that the engineering system works.
|
|
290
|
+
- [ ] **USEQ-3A8FC2D5** — Turn recurring onboarding questions, build failures, deployment tickets, access requests, and operational toil into product and platform improvements.
|
|
291
|
+
- [ ] **USEQ-EC6588B5** — Review developer-experience risks whenever tools, organizational structure, architecture, security policy, or delivery processes materially change.
|
|
292
|
+
|
|
293
|
+
#### Feedback loops and inner development cycle
|
|
294
|
+
|
|
295
|
+
- [ ] **USEQ-B09E273B** — Define target feedback times for editing, validation, formatting, compilation or analysis, focused tests, integration tests, review, build, deployment, and production verification.
|
|
296
|
+
- [ ] **USEQ-C262BE4B** — Measure end-to-end waiting time and queue time rather than only tool execution time.
|
|
297
|
+
- [ ] **USEQ-DAC53EAB** — Make fast local or isolated verification representative enough to catch common defects before expensive shared pipelines.
|
|
298
|
+
- [ ] **USEQ-3C5DA5E8** — Keep slow, broad, or expensive checks available without making every small change wait for unrelated coverage.
|
|
299
|
+
- [ ] **USEQ-C1D8AF64** — Use test selection, caching, parallelism, incremental analysis, and prebuilt environments only when correctness and reproducibility remain trustworthy.
|
|
300
|
+
- [ ] **USEQ-E29091F1** — Surface failures with the exact failing step, actionable cause, relevant logs, ownership, and remediation guidance.
|
|
301
|
+
- [ ] **USEQ-37226F1E** — Ensure developers can reproduce material pipeline failures locally or in an accessible diagnostic environment.
|
|
302
|
+
- [ ] **USEQ-CC581ACE** — Prevent flaky infrastructure, intermittent tests, and overloaded shared environments from becoming normalized background noise.
|
|
303
|
+
- [ ] **USEQ-BDB4D329** — Prioritize repair of broken mainline builds and shared development infrastructure according to their organization-wide cost.
|
|
304
|
+
- [ ] **USEQ-36CB4809** — Make code review assignment, status, required expertise, unresolved comments, and decision authority visible.
|
|
305
|
+
- [ ] **USEQ-AB3A0B9D** — Set review response expectations that preserve quality without creating long invisible queues.
|
|
306
|
+
- [ ] **USEQ-658ADA6B** — Provide early production-like feedback for configuration, migrations, permissions, performance, accessibility, security, and observability.
|
|
307
|
+
- [ ] **USEQ-D040219F** — Measure how often failures are detected at each lifecycle stage and move detection earlier when economically and technically justified.
|
|
308
|
+
- [ ] **USEQ-0F9A3D1B** — Ensure feedback remains available during provider, network, identity, or platform degradation through documented fallback paths where required.
|
|
309
|
+
|
|
310
|
+
#### Cognitive load, flow, and work design
|
|
311
|
+
|
|
312
|
+
- [ ] **USEQ-011FC4C6** — Limit the number of unrelated systems, interfaces, credentials, concepts, and manual decisions required for common workflows.
|
|
313
|
+
- [ ] **USEQ-E8B11D40** — Provide one discoverable authoritative entry point for services, ownership, documentation, environments, deployment, support, and operational status.
|
|
314
|
+
- [ ] **USEQ-1211B978** — Use consistent terminology, identity, navigation, commands, templates, and policy messages across internal capabilities.
|
|
315
|
+
- [ ] **USEQ-C7AADF90** — Make the safe path easier than bypassing controls or assembling an unsupported custom path.
|
|
316
|
+
- [ ] **USEQ-DBBC45BB** — Reduce context switching by limiting unnecessary meetings, interruptions, simultaneous priorities, handoffs, and approval queues.
|
|
317
|
+
- [ ] **USEQ-B2FE9B81** — Protect focused work while preserving explicit channels for incidents and genuinely urgent requests.
|
|
318
|
+
- [ ] **USEQ-5D046A65** — Limit work in progress at team and portfolio levels and finish high-value work before starting additional low-priority work.
|
|
319
|
+
- [ ] **USEQ-64A222AA** — Decompose work into small independently valuable batches without losing system-level design and integration thinking.
|
|
320
|
+
- [ ] **USEQ-8CC09A8B** — Keep ownership boundaries clear enough that teams know where to change behavior and whom to involve.
|
|
321
|
+
- [ ] **USEQ-23A2452C** — Avoid shifting platform, security, operations, or compliance complexity onto every application team through poorly designed self-service.
|
|
322
|
+
- [ ] **USEQ-A0FAB7FB** — Provide explanations and recovery paths when automated policy blocks work; do not return opaque denial messages.
|
|
323
|
+
- [ ] **USEQ-390C0893** — Design documentation and tools for recognition and guided choice rather than requiring memorization of volatile procedures.
|
|
324
|
+
- [ ] **USEQ-66FBAB61** — Track cognitive load introduced by legacy systems, fragmented platforms, excessive customization, incompatible conventions, and organizational coupling.
|
|
325
|
+
- [ ] **USEQ-D41144E6** — Retire redundant tools and paths after migration rather than preserving every historical option indefinitely.
|
|
326
|
+
|
|
327
|
+
#### Onboarding, environments, and daily usability
|
|
328
|
+
|
|
329
|
+
- [ ] **USEQ-C4A6187E** — Define the minimum supported path from account creation to a verified useful change and measure it with new or reset users.
|
|
330
|
+
- [ ] **USEQ-262F3070** — Automate account, repository, documentation, environment, test-data, secret, and deployment access according to role and least privilege.
|
|
331
|
+
- [ ] **USEQ-D031FE99** — Ensure onboarding does not depend on a particular person being available.
|
|
332
|
+
- [ ] **USEQ-72AF77C1** — Provide a current architectural orientation, service map, glossary, development workflow, quality gates, support route, and first-task guide.
|
|
333
|
+
- [ ] **USEQ-E3FF70A7** — Keep development setup reproducible from documented declarations and validate it regularly from a clean state.
|
|
334
|
+
- [ ] **USEQ-1EA7115D** — Minimize the use of production data and production access in ordinary development.
|
|
335
|
+
- [ ] **USEQ-AC9B4FCF** — Provide representative synthetic, generated, masked, or contract-based test data with known limitations.
|
|
336
|
+
- [ ] **USEQ-CD7A2F8E** — Support isolated and ephemeral environments when shared environments create collision, queueing, privacy, or reliability problems.
|
|
337
|
+
- [ ] **USEQ-4A4087C7** — Control environment drift and make differences from production explicit.
|
|
338
|
+
- [ ] **USEQ-63ACFD44** — Ensure local and remote development workflows meet security, accessibility, performance, and support requirements.
|
|
339
|
+
- [ ] **USEQ-2C0ADD3B** — Provide safe seed, reset, migration, and cleanup procedures for development and test state.
|
|
340
|
+
- [ ] **USEQ-7E8B9D53** — Make common debugging, tracing, profiling, and dependency simulation capabilities discoverable and permissioned.
|
|
341
|
+
- [ ] **USEQ-598AC30F** — Document offline, low-bandwidth, travel, and device-replacement recovery where work continuity requires it.
|
|
342
|
+
- [ ] **USEQ-DEFAB837** — Revalidate onboarding after major platform, identity, repository, architecture, or organizational changes.
|
|
343
|
+
|
|
344
|
+
#### Platform engineering as a product
|
|
345
|
+
|
|
346
|
+
- [ ] **USEQ-37A8A1E2** — Treat the internal platform as a product with named users, product management, service ownership, roadmap, support, research, adoption goals, and lifecycle funding.
|
|
347
|
+
- [ ] **USEQ-5BFBA215** — Build platform capabilities from observed user workflows and organization-specific constraints rather than copying a reference stack blindly.
|
|
348
|
+
- [ ] **USEQ-C5BF78A7** — Deliver small usable capabilities early and evolve through feedback instead of attempting a complete big-bang platform.
|
|
349
|
+
- [ ] **USEQ-0E7CE9E5** — Offer self-service for frequent, well-understood, automatable operations while retaining human review where consequence requires it.
|
|
350
|
+
- [ ] **USEQ-F2F34933** — Provide paved or golden paths that integrate security, privacy, observability, reliability, cost, documentation, and compliance by default.
|
|
351
|
+
- [ ] **USEQ-F2B89A92** — Allow justified escape paths and extensions without letting every team create an ungoverned parallel platform.
|
|
352
|
+
- [ ] **USEQ-52F5768B** — Define platform personas, supported use cases, service levels, prerequisites, quotas, costs, responsibilities, and exit paths.
|
|
353
|
+
- [ ] **USEQ-57EB708C** — Use stable, versioned platform interfaces and avoid forcing consumers to depend on internal implementation details.
|
|
354
|
+
- [ ] **USEQ-77692B0A** — Provide a service and software catalog with ownership, criticality, dependencies, runbooks, lifecycle, data classification, and operational health.
|
|
355
|
+
- [ ] **USEQ-8E00CB58** — Provide reusable templates only when their generated outputs remain understandable, owned, upgradeable, and removable.
|
|
356
|
+
- [ ] **USEQ-8AF5B8F4** — Make platform policies testable before deployment and explain violations in user terms.
|
|
357
|
+
- [ ] **USEQ-E5D8E500** — Minimize ticket-based provisioning for routine capabilities and measure ticket demand as evidence of missing self-service or unclear ownership.
|
|
358
|
+
- [ ] **USEQ-AC94BEB4** — Prevent platform adoption metrics from rewarding forced use while ignoring task success, satisfaction, reliability, or downstream outcomes.
|
|
359
|
+
- [ ] **USEQ-8B054594** — Provide migration support and coexistence periods when changing platform interfaces or golden paths.
|
|
360
|
+
- [ ] **USEQ-707DB5CA** — Retire deprecated paths only after consumer inventory, communication, migration evidence, and recovery planning are complete.
|
|
361
|
+
|
|
362
|
+
#### Platform security, compliance, and governance
|
|
363
|
+
|
|
364
|
+
- [ ] **USEQ-D23E6AE9** — Embed least privilege, strong identity, secret handling, provenance, policy checks, logging, and approved network patterns into default platform paths.
|
|
365
|
+
- [ ] **USEQ-DA324337** — Separate platform control-plane privileges from ordinary application-team privileges.
|
|
366
|
+
- [ ] **USEQ-79C11C18** — Make high-impact platform actions attributable, reviewable, time-bounded, and auditable.
|
|
367
|
+
- [ ] **USEQ-21D7885D** — Prevent templates and self-service workflows from creating public exposure, excessive privilege, unbounded cost, unsupported versions, or missing ownership by default.
|
|
368
|
+
- [ ] **USEQ-F9F2BEED** — Validate user-supplied parameters before provisioning and bound resource, region, data, network, and identity choices.
|
|
369
|
+
- [ ] **USEQ-2E333332** — Use policy as code where reliable, but retain an accountable exception and appeal process.
|
|
370
|
+
- [ ] **USEQ-85AD04E2** — Test policy behavior against intended allow, deny, exception, rollback, and degraded cases.
|
|
371
|
+
- [ ] **USEQ-6E35D785** — Ensure platform automation cannot access unrelated tenant, team, environment, repository, or production secrets.
|
|
372
|
+
- [ ] **USEQ-8BC1E850** — Inventory nonhuman users, automation agents, CI identities, service accounts, and AI agents as first-class platform consumers.
|
|
373
|
+
- [ ] **USEQ-94C7E270** — Provide scoped temporary credentials rather than distributing long-lived shared credentials.
|
|
374
|
+
- [ ] **USEQ-F5A77AE2** — Make compliance evidence an output of normal workflows rather than a separate manual reconstruction where practical.
|
|
375
|
+
- [ ] **USEQ-23AEDF92** — Keep platform-generated configurations, artifacts, attestations, and audit records traceable to request, policy, source, and approver.
|
|
376
|
+
- [ ] **USEQ-3712C085** — Threat-model the platform as a high-leverage dependency and test compromise, abuse, supply-chain, and insider scenarios.
|
|
377
|
+
- [ ] **USEQ-C5BBCBD4** — Maintain break-glass recovery that works when normal identity, documentation, or platform control planes are unavailable.
|
|
378
|
+
|
|
379
|
+
#### Platform reliability and operability
|
|
380
|
+
|
|
381
|
+
- [ ] **USEQ-104A029B** — Define user-facing SLIs and SLOs for critical platform workflows such as environment creation, build, test, artifact publication, deployment, rollback, and secret delivery.
|
|
382
|
+
- [ ] **USEQ-105A2D16** — Monitor task success from the consumer perspective, not only platform component uptime.
|
|
383
|
+
- [ ] **USEQ-1B99F055** — Provide status, incident communication, ownership, support, escalation, and postmortem processes for internal platform services.
|
|
384
|
+
- [ ] **USEQ-E2721BE2** — Design the platform so failure of an optional capability does not block unrelated delivery unnecessarily.
|
|
385
|
+
- [ ] **USEQ-859CA94E** — Test queue saturation, provider throttling, control-plane outage, identity failure, registry failure, network partition, and corrupt template scenarios.
|
|
386
|
+
- [ ] **USEQ-6FE68803** — Keep a supported manual or alternate path for genuinely critical operations when the primary platform is unavailable, and test it.
|
|
387
|
+
- [ ] **USEQ-99B27008** — Prevent a platform outage from removing access to the runbooks, credentials, artifacts, or communication needed for recovery.
|
|
388
|
+
- [ ] **USEQ-85373024** — Apply capacity planning, quotas, fairness, backpressure, and cost controls to shared capabilities.
|
|
389
|
+
- [ ] **USEQ-D8F0B0C5** — Publish maintenance windows, deprecation schedules, breaking changes, and reliability limitations.
|
|
390
|
+
- [ ] **USEQ-23DC86B8** — Keep rollback and version compatibility for platform interfaces, templates, policies, and generated assets.
|
|
391
|
+
- [ ] **USEQ-A96AE686** — Measure adoption alongside failure rate, support burden, lead time, stability, user satisfaction, and cost.
|
|
392
|
+
- [ ] **USEQ-C326D283** — Review whether platform centralization creates unacceptable correlated failure or organizational bottlenecks.
|
|
393
|
+
|
|
394
|
+
#### Balanced engineering measurement
|
|
395
|
+
|
|
396
|
+
- [ ] **USEQ-A84EEA72** — Use the current DORA delivery metrics as team or service-level outcome signals: change lead time, deployment frequency, failed deployment recovery time, change fail rate, and deployment rework rate.
|
|
397
|
+
- [ ] **USEQ-CAC06908** — Define events and denominators consistently before comparing delivery metrics over time.
|
|
398
|
+
- [ ] **USEQ-401CFDDA** — Measure metrics at a level where one flow of work and one operating context make interpretation meaningful.
|
|
399
|
+
- [ ] **USEQ-641B8692** — Do not use delivery metrics to rank individual engineers or teams with materially different contexts.
|
|
400
|
+
- [ ] **USEQ-EF22FA21** — Pair throughput metrics with stability, quality, security, privacy, accessibility, user outcome, well-being, and sustainability measures.
|
|
401
|
+
- [ ] **USEQ-6B03300D** — Use SPACE dimensions—satisfaction and well-being, performance, activity, communication and collaboration, and efficiency and flow—as a multidimensional lens rather than one composite score.
|
|
402
|
+
- [ ] **USEQ-D038E87B** — Use DevEx dimensions—feedback loops, cognitive load, and flow state—to identify causes rather than merely reporting sentiment.
|
|
403
|
+
- [ ] **USEQ-51FAFA2F** — Protect survey confidentiality and avoid collecting more employee data than needed.
|
|
404
|
+
- [ ] **USEQ-4BA2DDFB** — Publish metric definitions, data sources, exclusions, known biases, confidence, and intended decisions.
|
|
405
|
+
- [ ] **USEQ-23DD5632** — Audit telemetry for gaming, selection bias, missing work, bot activity, reclassification, and changed process semantics.
|
|
406
|
+
- [ ] **USEQ-AA2239E3** — Prefer trends and distributions to isolated averages and vanity totals.
|
|
407
|
+
- [ ] **USEQ-98265229** — Use qualitative inquiry to explain metric changes before acting on them.
|
|
408
|
+
- [ ] **USEQ-67683E93** — Retire metrics that no longer drive decisions or that create harmful incentives.
|
|
409
|
+
- [ ] **USEQ-078B9EDE** — Evaluate interventions with a baseline, expected mechanism, counter-metrics, observation period, and rollback criteria.
|
|
410
|
+
|
|
411
|
+
#### Engineering economics and business cases
|
|
412
|
+
|
|
413
|
+
- [ ] **USEQ-FD4E143E** — State the decision, alternatives, objectives, constraints, affected stakeholders, time horizon, and decision owner for every material investment.
|
|
414
|
+
- [ ] **USEQ-2A4B44EE** — Compare continuing, improving, replacing, buying, building, outsourcing, partnering, open sourcing, delaying, reducing scope, and stopping where plausible.
|
|
415
|
+
- [ ] **USEQ-01C9C8B4** — Estimate full lifecycle cost including discovery, acquisition, implementation, integration, migration, data conversion, security, privacy, accessibility, testing, operations, support, training, compliance, vendor management, downtime, exit, and retirement.
|
|
416
|
+
- [ ] **USEQ-FD955F18** — Include opportunity cost and the cost of delayed value, not only direct expenditure.
|
|
417
|
+
- [ ] **USEQ-01C3D941** — Identify benefits as measurable changes in user outcomes, revenue, risk, cost, capacity, quality, or strategic option value.
|
|
418
|
+
- [ ] **USEQ-606B2B76** — Avoid claiming time savings as cash savings unless the released capacity can be used or removed in a defined way.
|
|
419
|
+
- [ ] **USEQ-5906325E** — Model ranges and scenarios rather than one unjustifiably precise point estimate.
|
|
420
|
+
- [ ] **USEQ-B7F42705** — Discount future costs and benefits consistently when the decision horizon makes present-value analysis material.
|
|
421
|
+
- [ ] **USEQ-D09828A7** — Separate sunk costs from future decision-relevant costs.
|
|
422
|
+
- [ ] **USEQ-402B58A8** — Identify irreversible commitments, lock-in, switching cost, and the value of preserving options.
|
|
423
|
+
- [ ] **USEQ-8B570320** — Include expected loss from reliability, security, privacy, safety, legal, supplier, schedule, and adoption risks.
|
|
424
|
+
- [ ] **USEQ-BF1DBF5E** — Use sensitivity analysis to identify assumptions that dominate the decision.
|
|
425
|
+
- [ ] **USEQ-FB93CC82** — Define leading indicators and stop, pivot, expand, and review thresholds before committing the full investment.
|
|
426
|
+
- [ ] **USEQ-CEE325A1** — Update the business case with actual cost, benefit, adoption, quality, and risk evidence after delivery.
|
|
427
|
+
- [ ] **USEQ-8A77D825** — Record who accepted uncertainty and residual risk rather than hiding them in optimistic estimates.
|
|
428
|
+
|
|
429
|
+
#### Cost estimation and forecasting
|
|
430
|
+
|
|
431
|
+
- [ ] **USEQ-B9C50500** — Define the estimate's purpose, scope, decision date, confidence needs, currency, price basis, and included lifecycle stages.
|
|
432
|
+
- [ ] **USEQ-9AEFE830** — Create a technical and operational baseline describing intended capability, architecture, users, scale, data, integrations, quality targets, schedule, and constraints.
|
|
433
|
+
- [ ] **USEQ-73709F91** — Use a work breakdown that covers all material work and avoids double counting.
|
|
434
|
+
- [ ] **USEQ-A898AA51** — Document ground rules, assumptions, exclusions, dependencies, productivity factors, staffing model, inflation, exchange rates, and contingency treatment.
|
|
435
|
+
- [ ] **USEQ-F4AA620F** — Use relevant historical data and normalize it for size, complexity, technology, team maturity, quality obligations, and economic conditions.
|
|
436
|
+
- [ ] **USEQ-8596CFFB** — Select estimation methods appropriate to maturity and triangulate high-impact estimates using more than one method where possible.
|
|
437
|
+
- [ ] **USEQ-BFF44BBF** — Separate estimate uncertainty from management reserve and from intentionally deferred scope.
|
|
438
|
+
- [ ] **USEQ-A67CAF6F** — Model correlation among risks rather than summing independent optimistic contingencies blindly.
|
|
439
|
+
- [ ] **USEQ-8DBEC4BA** — Use probabilistic ranges for uncertain cost and schedule where consequence warrants it.
|
|
440
|
+
- [ ] **USEQ-7C70CDE8** — Perform sensitivity and risk analysis and identify the variables that most affect outcome.
|
|
441
|
+
- [ ] **USEQ-B74D3C1D** — Reconcile estimates with available capacity, hiring lead time, procurement time, and critical dependencies.
|
|
442
|
+
- [ ] **USEQ-5E3A5C8B** — Have material estimates independently reviewed for scope completeness, assumptions, data quality, method, arithmetic, bias, and credibility.
|
|
443
|
+
- [ ] **USEQ-DD3C0E57** — Document estimates so another qualified person can reproduce the logic and inputs.
|
|
444
|
+
- [ ] **USEQ-5E58EFDA** — Compare actuals with estimates at consistent milestones and explain variance by cause.
|
|
445
|
+
- [ ] **USEQ-0B9A4977** — Re-estimate after material scope, architecture, supplier, staffing, risk, quality, or schedule changes.
|
|
446
|
+
- [ ] **USEQ-E0A45D6A** — Do not convert an early exploratory estimate into a commitment without increasing evidence and explicitly changing its confidence classification.
|
|
447
|
+
|
|
448
|
+
#### Scheduling, dependencies, and delivery forecasting
|
|
449
|
+
|
|
450
|
+
- [ ] **USEQ-961773F5** — Represent all material work, milestones, external dependencies, approvals, migrations, training, operational readiness, and retirement activities in the delivery model.
|
|
451
|
+
- [ ] **USEQ-884A77F0** — Define task logic and dependencies rather than choosing dates independently.
|
|
452
|
+
- [ ] **USEQ-AB5BD18C** — Identify the critical and near-critical paths and monitor changes to them.
|
|
453
|
+
- [ ] **USEQ-3682C3C5** — Model resource availability, specialized skills, leave, support obligations, review capacity, environments, and supplier lead times.
|
|
454
|
+
- [ ] **USEQ-1B383C61** — Avoid planning people at full theoretical utilization; preserve capacity for coordination, incidents, learning, and uncertainty.
|
|
455
|
+
- [ ] **USEQ-4C01CA36** — Use ranges or probabilistic forecasts when task duration and scope are uncertain.
|
|
456
|
+
- [ ] **USEQ-82AC181E** — Track blocked time, queue time, rework, dependency age, and decision latency.
|
|
457
|
+
- [ ] **USEQ-163CD3CD** — Keep milestones tied to verifiable outcomes and evidence, not percentage-complete estimates.
|
|
458
|
+
- [ ] **USEQ-EEBE0AC0** — Reforecast using actual throughput and discovered work rather than preserving obsolete dates.
|
|
459
|
+
- [ ] **USEQ-65304AB1** — Make scope, time, cost, quality, and risk trade-offs explicit when constraints conflict.
|
|
460
|
+
- [ ] **USEQ-D1A09FF0** — Prevent schedule pressure from silently removing testing, accessibility, security, documentation, recovery, or maintenance work.
|
|
461
|
+
- [ ] **USEQ-57586986** — Define release, migration, rollback, stabilization, and support windows with adequate observation time.
|
|
462
|
+
- [ ] **USEQ-2E6ADA23** — Escalate dependencies before they reach the critical path rather than after they miss a date.
|
|
463
|
+
- [ ] **USEQ-E630B3A9** — Maintain a decision log explaining changes to committed scope and schedule.
|
|
464
|
+
|
|
465
|
+
#### Portfolio prioritization and investment governance
|
|
466
|
+
|
|
467
|
+
- [ ] **USEQ-0070EAA7** — Prioritize work using expected user and business value, strategic fit, urgency, risk reduction, learning value, dependency enablement, lifecycle cost, and capacity—not stakeholder volume alone.
|
|
468
|
+
- [ ] **USEQ-98ACEC61** — Reserve capacity for reliability, security, privacy, accessibility, platform health, maintenance, debt, and retirement.
|
|
469
|
+
- [ ] **USEQ-B54B7203** — Evaluate portfolio concentration by product, provider, technology, region, revenue source, data class, and key person.
|
|
470
|
+
- [ ] **USEQ-E49765AE** — Limit simultaneous initiatives to the organization's actual integration and change capacity.
|
|
471
|
+
- [ ] **USEQ-0D1C652B** — Fund discovery and risk retirement before making irreversible large commitments.
|
|
472
|
+
- [ ] **USEQ-3D020109** — Use staged investment with explicit evidence gates for uncertain initiatives.
|
|
473
|
+
- [ ] **USEQ-5C653F02** — Define success, failure, stop, pivot, and sunset criteria before launch.
|
|
474
|
+
- [ ] **USEQ-BBF30CFF** — Stop or reduce work when evidence no longer supports the expected outcome rather than protecting sunk cost.
|
|
475
|
+
- [ ] **USEQ-96ECBC49** — Review whether a local optimization shifts greater cost or risk to customers, support, operations, security, another team, or the future.
|
|
476
|
+
- [ ] **USEQ-0ACF35D3** — Include decommissioning and benefit-realization work in portfolio capacity.
|
|
477
|
+
- [ ] **USEQ-82D9539C** — Make priority decisions and trade-offs visible so teams are not forced to infer them from interruptions.
|
|
478
|
+
- [ ] **USEQ-BB0B4D99** — Review the portfolio after material market, regulatory, supplier, incident, capacity, or strategy changes.
|
|
479
|
+
|
|
480
|
+
#### Build, buy, open source, and supplier acquisition
|
|
481
|
+
|
|
482
|
+
- [ ] **USEQ-1B32D90B** — Define the capability and quality requirements before selecting a product, provider, framework, platform, or outsourcing arrangement.
|
|
483
|
+
- [ ] **USEQ-735862F8** — Evaluate functional fit, security, privacy, accessibility, reliability, performance, scalability, interoperability, data portability, operability, maintainability, support, and total cost.
|
|
484
|
+
- [ ] **USEQ-590D0692** — Assess supplier ownership, financial health, governance, development practices, vulnerability handling, roadmap, support model, and concentration risk.
|
|
485
|
+
- [ ] **USEQ-D6C76249** — Inventory sub-suppliers and critical external dependencies where risk warrants it.
|
|
486
|
+
- [ ] **USEQ-4C04425F** — Require evidence for security, accessibility, compliance, data location, deletion, backup, incident notification, and continuity claims.
|
|
487
|
+
- [ ] **USEQ-D6453C61** — Evaluate integration and migration cost using a representative proof, not only vendor demonstrations.
|
|
488
|
+
- [ ] **USEQ-56890F18** — Test contractual service levels against actual user objectives and define remedies, escalation, and evidence access.
|
|
489
|
+
- [ ] **USEQ-672B794C** — Retain rights to necessary data, configuration, logs, documentation, artifacts, and export formats.
|
|
490
|
+
- [ ] **USEQ-565684CB** — Define termination, migration assistance, credential revocation, data return, deletion, transition period, and exit cost before commitment.
|
|
491
|
+
- [ ] **USEQ-8754EEDE** — Avoid proprietary lock-in unless its value exceeds modeled switching risk and an accountable owner accepts it.
|
|
492
|
+
- [ ] **USEQ-34334A55** — Review open-source governance, license, maintainer health, release cadence, security response, transitive dependencies, and contribution strategy.
|
|
493
|
+
- [ ] **USEQ-2CBC3606** — Define ownership for forks, patches, vendored code, unsupported versions, and upstream contributions.
|
|
494
|
+
- [ ] **USEQ-41AD9DE5** — Use escrow, source access, alternate providers, or internal capability where loss of a supplier would create unacceptable continuity risk.
|
|
495
|
+
- [ ] **USEQ-FE5899D5** — Continuously monitor supplier changes that can alter price, terms, data use, functionality, security, support, or geographic availability.
|
|
496
|
+
|
|
497
|
+
#### People, skills, sustainability, and organizational resilience
|
|
498
|
+
|
|
499
|
+
- [ ] **USEQ-D91347DE** — Maintain a capability map for product, domain, architecture, code, data, security, privacy, accessibility, operations, and supplier knowledge.
|
|
500
|
+
- [ ] **USEQ-8394400E** — Ensure every critical service and recovery procedure has more than one qualified person and accessible documentation.
|
|
501
|
+
- [ ] **USEQ-8D1332CC** — Plan training before introducing technology or controls that teams are expected to operate safely.
|
|
502
|
+
- [ ] **USEQ-C1AF4BE4** — Provide mentoring, review, communities of practice, and protected learning time rather than relying only on courses.
|
|
503
|
+
- [ ] **USEQ-457EF747** — Design roles and on-call expectations that are sustainable and compatible with health, leave, and local obligations.
|
|
504
|
+
- [ ] **USEQ-44E36BD7** — Track burnout, interruption, after-hours load, incident frequency, support burden, and chronic understaffing as system risks.
|
|
505
|
+
- [ ] **USEQ-A48592E0** — Do not use heroics as a capacity plan or performance expectation.
|
|
506
|
+
- [ ] **USEQ-CCCA9A78** — Include contractors and suppliers in necessary knowledge transfer, documentation, incident, security, and exit processes.
|
|
507
|
+
- [ ] **USEQ-1479A1E6** — Ensure performance management does not reward risky volume, hidden work, gate bypass, knowledge hoarding, or incident concealment.
|
|
508
|
+
- [ ] **USEQ-51E72868** — Create psychologically safe routes to raise quality, security, ethics, accessibility, and schedule concerns.
|
|
509
|
+
- [ ] **USEQ-9EDBBD06** — Protect whistleblowing and escalation from retaliation.
|
|
510
|
+
- [ ] **USEQ-447508A8** — Plan succession, offboarding, access removal, artifact transfer, and ownership reassignment.
|
|
511
|
+
- [ ] **USEQ-59C8FAD1** — Review whether reorganizations create orphaned services, broken escalation paths, duplicated platforms, or unsupported commitments.
|
|
512
|
+
|
|
513
|
+
#### Engineering-system release blockers
|
|
514
|
+
|
|
515
|
+
- [ ] **USEQ-BF8D8060** — Do not declare the engineering system ready when a routine critical workflow depends on undocumented manual intervention or one person's availability.
|
|
516
|
+
- [ ] **USEQ-C67086D4** — Do not introduce a mandatory platform path that cannot meet required reliability, security, accessibility, and recovery objectives.
|
|
517
|
+
- [ ] **USEQ-8BBAAB6D** — Do not use individual productivity rankings, raw activity counts, or one delivery metric as a quality or performance verdict.
|
|
518
|
+
- [ ] **USEQ-4156513F** — Do not commit a material investment whose scope, lifecycle cost, dominant assumptions, alternatives, and exit path are unknown.
|
|
519
|
+
- [ ] **USEQ-3F0AD88C** — Do not commit to a date that omits critical dependencies, quality work, migration, stabilization, or support capacity.
|
|
520
|
+
- [ ] **USEQ-A70E005C** — Do not buy or build a critical capability without an accountable owner, operating model, support plan, and retirement path.
|
|
521
|
+
- [ ] **USEQ-8BA058A0** — Do not accept chronic broken builds, flaky tests, access delays, deployment tickets, or environment instability as normal developer experience.
|
|
522
|
+
- [ ] **USEQ-31618E9F** — Do not force migration away from a supported path without consumer inventory, compatibility evidence, communication, and recovery.
|
|
523
|
+
- [ ] **USEQ-92FFBA7B** — Do not use platform adoption as success evidence when user outcomes, stability, throughput, satisfaction, or total cost deteriorate.
|
|
524
|
+
- [ ] **USEQ-D933D63C** — Do not proceed when workload, on-call, knowledge concentration, or staffing makes safe operation unsustainable.
|
|
525
|
+
|
|
526
|
+
## Platform Engineering, Developer Experience, and Engineering Effectiveness
|
|
527
|
+
|
|
528
|
+
_Consolidated from `final consolidated corpus/07-delivery-configuration-platform-developer-experience-cicd.md#Platform Engineering, Developer Experience, and Engineering Effectiveness`; 238 non-duplicative controls._
|
|
529
|
+
|
|
530
|
+
### Platform and developer-experience strategy
|
|
531
|
+
|
|
532
|
+
- [ ] **USEQ-2837A62E** — Treat internal engineering capabilities as products with identifiable users, outcomes, owners, roadmaps, support, and lifecycle decisions.
|
|
533
|
+
- [ ] **USEQ-2087E7B1** — Define which developer, operator, analyst, data, security, support, and partner personas the platform serves.
|
|
534
|
+
- [ ] **USEQ-7872D116** — Research user workflows and friction directly rather than inferring needs only from leadership or tool owners.
|
|
535
|
+
- [ ] **USEQ-2ADEDFF1** — Define the outcomes the platform should improve, such as safe delivery, feedback speed, reliability, compliance, onboarding, or cognitive load.
|
|
536
|
+
- [ ] **USEQ-9624E443** — Do not create a platform merely to centralize control or standardize tools without demonstrated user value.
|
|
537
|
+
- [ ] **USEQ-C98C9BC6** — Distinguish mandatory organization controls from optional accelerators and clearly explain why each mandatory control exists.
|
|
538
|
+
- [ ] **USEQ-F8CE1AED** — Define what the platform owns, what product teams own, and what suppliers own.
|
|
539
|
+
- [ ] **USEQ-84F487EA** — Publish a service boundary, supported use cases, non-goals, dependencies, and escalation model.
|
|
540
|
+
- [ ] **USEQ-D88D34D6** — Prioritize capabilities using user impact, delivery risk, security, reliability, cost, and total organizational effort.
|
|
541
|
+
- [ ] **USEQ-9D173BAA** — Fund platform maintenance, support, security, migration, and deprecation—not only initial construction.
|
|
542
|
+
- [ ] **USEQ-2BC4E867** — Use an incremental “thinnest viable platform” or equivalent approach instead of attempting to build every capability before learning from use.
|
|
543
|
+
- [ ] **USEQ-624E74B9** — Keep platform adoption voluntary where risk permits and earn adoption through value; where controls are mandatory, make the compliant path the easiest path.
|
|
544
|
+
- [ ] **USEQ-F61BB327** — Review whether the platform increases autonomy or merely moves tickets and bottlenecks to a different team.
|
|
545
|
+
- [ ] **USEQ-BD39D438** — Measure and manage platform-induced lock-in, concentration risk, and loss of local expertise.
|
|
546
|
+
|
|
547
|
+
### Service catalog, ownership, and discoverability
|
|
548
|
+
|
|
549
|
+
- [ ] **USEQ-75B23248** — Maintain a searchable catalog of services, applications, libraries, data products, pipelines, environments, infrastructure, owners, dependencies, criticality, and lifecycle status.
|
|
550
|
+
- [ ] **USEQ-0537910D** — Assign an accountable owner and operational contact to every production component.
|
|
551
|
+
- [ ] **USEQ-D80B97CE** — Record source repository, documentation, runbook, dashboards, alerts, SLOs, data classifications, APIs, dependencies, and deployment location for each catalog entry.
|
|
552
|
+
- [ ] **USEQ-010C8741** — Identify orphaned, duplicate, abandoned, unsupported, and unowned components.
|
|
553
|
+
- [ ] **USEQ-312DD67A** — Keep catalog data synchronized automatically where reliable and review manually supplied metadata for staleness.
|
|
554
|
+
- [ ] **USEQ-ACF53040** — Distinguish authoritative metadata from discovered or inferred metadata.
|
|
555
|
+
- [ ] **USEQ-DEDBCA46** — Expose dependency and ownership relationships without revealing sensitive topology to unauthorized users.
|
|
556
|
+
- [ ] **USEQ-86095E9D** — Integrate catalog ownership with incident routing, vulnerability notifications, deprecation notices, and cost allocation.
|
|
557
|
+
- [ ] **USEQ-C2E31CA3** — Define registration and retirement workflows so new and deleted components do not bypass inventory.
|
|
558
|
+
- [ ] **USEQ-8972276D** — Provide stable identifiers for catalog entities across renames, moves, and platform migrations.
|
|
559
|
+
- [ ] **USEQ-489B6ACB** — Allow teams to discover approved components, examples, policies, and reusable capabilities without tribal knowledge.
|
|
560
|
+
- [ ] **USEQ-6385F8F8** — Monitor coverage and freshness of the catalog as an operational control.
|
|
561
|
+
- [ ] **USEQ-5FDA8D4E** — Do not treat catalog presence as evidence that documentation, support, or ownership is actually effective.
|
|
562
|
+
- [ ] **USEQ-FB32D303** — Keep emergency contact information available when the normal catalog or identity platform is unavailable.
|
|
563
|
+
|
|
564
|
+
### Golden paths, paved roads, templates, and reusable capabilities
|
|
565
|
+
|
|
566
|
+
- [ ] **USEQ-07FDA5F4** — Provide recommended paths for common workflows using secure, observable, supportable, and maintained defaults.
|
|
567
|
+
- [ ] **USEQ-4B12B7BF** — Design paths around complete user outcomes such as creating, testing, deploying, operating, and retiring a service—not isolated tool installation.
|
|
568
|
+
- [ ] **USEQ-2603D264** — Keep recommended paths versioned, documented, testable, and reproducible.
|
|
569
|
+
- [ ] **USEQ-2B0F618E** — Generate the minimum necessary starter material and avoid creating large opaque templates teams cannot understand.
|
|
570
|
+
- [ ] **USEQ-1FA6A3A8** — Ensure generated projects have clear ownership, dependency provenance, update paths, tests, and removal instructions.
|
|
571
|
+
- [ ] **USEQ-372F71E0** — Provide examples that follow current standards and are continuously tested.
|
|
572
|
+
- [ ] **USEQ-69A27DFC** — Use shared libraries and components only when their support, compatibility, and change model are clear.
|
|
573
|
+
- [ ] **USEQ-2BCB3A9A** — Avoid forcing unrelated products into one architecture when risk and requirements differ.
|
|
574
|
+
- [ ] **USEQ-710C661D** — Provide reviewed escape hatches for legitimate exceptions, with explicit ownership and risk treatment.
|
|
575
|
+
- [ ] **USEQ-8CF50CBD** — Ensure escaping a recommended path does not silently remove security, privacy, accessibility, reliability, or audit controls.
|
|
576
|
+
- [ ] **USEQ-ADE1D409** — Track adoption, abandonment, support burden, defect rates, and user satisfaction for each path.
|
|
577
|
+
- [ ] **USEQ-B3750A1C** — Deprecate obsolete paths with migration tooling, communication, and sufficient support windows.
|
|
578
|
+
- [ ] **USEQ-A33D1C6F** — Allow teams to inspect and understand generated configuration and infrastructure.
|
|
579
|
+
- [ ] **USEQ-9BCE1201** — Prevent templates from embedding secrets, obsolete dependencies, insecure defaults, or organization-specific identifiers.
|
|
580
|
+
|
|
581
|
+
### Self-service and workflow automation
|
|
582
|
+
|
|
583
|
+
- [ ] **USEQ-2E72ABDB** — Enable authorized users to perform frequent low-risk actions without waiting for manual tickets.
|
|
584
|
+
- [ ] **USEQ-2B4C917C** — Automate policy checks and approvals that are deterministic; reserve human approval for judgment, exceptions, and high-impact risk.
|
|
585
|
+
- [ ] **USEQ-4B11585B** — Use clear inputs, previews, validation, cost implications, and consequences before self-service actions execute.
|
|
586
|
+
- [ ] **USEQ-E31ED114** — Make destructive and high-impact operations reversible, confirmable, or subject to additional authorization as appropriate.
|
|
587
|
+
- [ ] **USEQ-8CBDC7EA** — Keep self-service workflows idempotent and safe to retry.
|
|
588
|
+
- [ ] **USEQ-C2F428A8** — Provide progress, failure, rollback, and recovery information for long-running operations.
|
|
589
|
+
- [ ] **USEQ-3B63475F** — Do not hide partial failure or leave ambiguous resource ownership.
|
|
590
|
+
- [ ] **USEQ-5B6344BA** — Use scoped identities and least privilege for automation.
|
|
591
|
+
- [ ] **USEQ-B737F580** — Record actor, request, policy decision, artifact, configuration, outcome, and affected resources for auditable actions.
|
|
592
|
+
- [ ] **USEQ-6325634F** — Apply quotas, rate limits, budgets, and guardrails to prevent accidental or malicious resource exhaustion.
|
|
593
|
+
- [ ] **USEQ-4B82601E** — Prevent users from provisioning unsupported versions or bypassing required lifecycle controls.
|
|
594
|
+
- [ ] **USEQ-DBFE6DD8** — Provide an escalation path when automation cannot satisfy a valid request.
|
|
595
|
+
- [ ] **USEQ-CB367A5D** — Measure whether self-service reduces total wait time and toil rather than only ticket count.
|
|
596
|
+
- [ ] **USEQ-A3EF0CB5** — Test automation against duplicate requests, cancellation, dependency failure, and platform outages.
|
|
597
|
+
|
|
598
|
+
### Environment creation, onboarding, and reproducibility
|
|
599
|
+
|
|
600
|
+
- [ ] **USEQ-587143E3** — Provide a documented, testable path from a new authorized workstation or workspace to a functioning development environment.
|
|
601
|
+
- [ ] **USEQ-DBC5BFD6** — Minimize required manual installation, local machine mutation, and hidden prerequisites.
|
|
602
|
+
- [ ] **USEQ-0B335E6B** — Pin or verify toolchain, runtime, dependency, and generator versions sufficiently for reproducibility.
|
|
603
|
+
- [ ] **USEQ-AB6CABAF** — Keep setup scripts idempotent and safe to rerun.
|
|
604
|
+
- [ ] **USEQ-1629715E** — Validate prerequisites early and produce actionable errors.
|
|
605
|
+
- [ ] **USEQ-1AAC867A** — Provide sanitized representative test data and avoid copying production data by default.
|
|
606
|
+
- [ ] **USEQ-53AE4D3E** — Use separate identities, credentials, data, endpoints, and side-effect controls for non-production environments.
|
|
607
|
+
- [ ] **USEQ-D5E12F9F** — Make environment reset and cleanup reliable.
|
|
608
|
+
- [ ] **USEQ-8C2638B8** — Ensure local, remote, containerized, virtual, or hosted development options meet security and accessibility requirements.
|
|
609
|
+
- [ ] **USEQ-78829D95** — Provide an alternative when a developer cannot use a specific hardware platform, biometric method, visual tool, or network location.
|
|
610
|
+
- [ ] **USEQ-1B1561EC** — Document meaningful differences between local, test, staging, and production behavior.
|
|
611
|
+
- [ ] **USEQ-C59AAC06** — Measure onboarding task success and time without turning individual speed into a performance score.
|
|
612
|
+
- [ ] **USEQ-547DB4A5** — Test onboarding instructions with people unfamiliar with the system.
|
|
613
|
+
- [ ] **USEQ-697FCFA9** — Remove obsolete setup paths and prevent conflicting documentation from remaining discoverable.
|
|
614
|
+
|
|
615
|
+
### Feedback loops, builds, tests, and review latency
|
|
616
|
+
|
|
617
|
+
- [ ] **USEQ-B739ED54** — Keep the fastest relevant validation close to the developer and defer expensive checks without losing release assurance.
|
|
618
|
+
- [ ] **USEQ-9450BC5E** — Define target feedback times for formatting, compilation, static analysis, unit tests, integration tests, review, builds, and deployments.
|
|
619
|
+
- [ ] **USEQ-03172925** — Monitor feedback latency percentiles and queue time rather than averages alone.
|
|
620
|
+
- [ ] **USEQ-65A42809** — Prioritize deterministic, actionable failures over large volumes of noisy output.
|
|
621
|
+
- [ ] **USEQ-62AAA93F** — Fail early on configuration, dependency, schema, and policy errors that would invalidate later work.
|
|
622
|
+
- [ ] **USEQ-F9B57D3D** — Parallelize independent checks without introducing nondeterminism or excessive resource cost.
|
|
623
|
+
- [ ] **USEQ-FEDEFC91** — Use caching only when cache keys, invalidation, isolation, provenance, and poisoning risks are controlled.
|
|
624
|
+
- [ ] **USEQ-0F71EDF0** — Make it easy to reproduce a CI failure locally or in an isolated diagnostic environment.
|
|
625
|
+
- [ ] **USEQ-31021B4A** — Provide logs and artifacts sufficient to diagnose failures without broad privileged access.
|
|
626
|
+
- [ ] **USEQ-6E3F668E** — Track flaky tests, intermittent infrastructure failures, canceled jobs, and reruns separately from product defects.
|
|
627
|
+
- [ ] **USEQ-725337F7** — Prevent teams from normalizing repeated reruns as a valid delivery process.
|
|
628
|
+
- [ ] **USEQ-E454B7C4** — Keep code-review queues visible and balance reviewer load and expertise.
|
|
629
|
+
- [ ] **USEQ-66533E37** — Encourage small batches that can be reviewed, tested, deployed, and reversed safely.
|
|
630
|
+
- [ ] **USEQ-5A81540A** — Measure end-to-end feedback loops, including waiting for environments, data, approvals, reviews, and external teams.
|
|
631
|
+
|
|
632
|
+
### Internal APIs, contracts, and integration experience
|
|
633
|
+
|
|
634
|
+
- [ ] **USEQ-90D7EA9F** — Treat platform interfaces as supported products with explicit contracts, versioning, ownership, and compatibility policies.
|
|
635
|
+
- [ ] **USEQ-A87EE218** — Publish schemas, examples, error semantics, rate limits, quotas, authentication, authorization, idempotency, and lifecycle states.
|
|
636
|
+
- [ ] **USEQ-C38502CA** — Provide machine-readable interfaces where automation is expected and human-readable interfaces where judgment is required.
|
|
637
|
+
- [ ] **USEQ-CDE257DC** — Keep command-line, user-interface, API, and configuration behavior semantically consistent.
|
|
638
|
+
- [ ] **USEQ-15FDD113** — Use stable identifiers and avoid exposing volatile internal implementation details.
|
|
639
|
+
- [ ] **USEQ-B0E23E13** — Validate inputs before creating partial resources.
|
|
640
|
+
- [ ] **USEQ-CF3EEC00** — Provide preview, plan, or dry-run behavior for consequential changes where practical.
|
|
641
|
+
- [ ] **USEQ-1D76E3B6** — Define asynchronous operation status, cancellation, retry, timeout, and reconciliation behavior.
|
|
642
|
+
- [ ] **USEQ-2702E53D** — Provide contract tests or conformance suites for clients and providers.
|
|
643
|
+
- [ ] **USEQ-74089988** — Use deprecation notices that reach actual consumers and include migration guidance and deadlines.
|
|
644
|
+
- [ ] **USEQ-6DDF8C21** — Monitor use of deprecated interfaces and identify unknown consumers before removal.
|
|
645
|
+
- [ ] **USEQ-B74367BE** — Keep error messages actionable and linked to current documentation.
|
|
646
|
+
- [ ] **USEQ-6707A6FE** — Do not require consumers to scrape logs or user interfaces when a stable interface is appropriate.
|
|
647
|
+
- [ ] **USEQ-4F9EA2A9** — Test interface accessibility and localization when humans interact with it.
|
|
648
|
+
|
|
649
|
+
### Guardrails, policy as code, and secure defaults
|
|
650
|
+
|
|
651
|
+
- [ ] **USEQ-48758704** — Encode repeatable mandatory controls in versioned, reviewed, tested policy where practical.
|
|
652
|
+
- [ ] **USEQ-A3C4E315** — Keep policy source, rationale, owner, scope, severity, remediation guidance, and exception process visible.
|
|
653
|
+
- [ ] **USEQ-91D01B47** — Test policy rules against allowed and prohibited examples before enforcement.
|
|
654
|
+
- [ ] **USEQ-CFDE8E86** — Roll out high-impact policy changes progressively and measure false positives and operational impact.
|
|
655
|
+
- [ ] **USEQ-DA1E0181** — Fail closed for critical security and authorization controls unless a documented safety analysis requires another behavior.
|
|
656
|
+
- [ ] **USEQ-C663C195** — Use warning or advisory modes only when the residual risk is explicitly accepted and monitored.
|
|
657
|
+
- [ ] **USEQ-A04912A7** — Provide safe defaults for identity, network access, encryption, logging, backups, resource limits, and exposure.
|
|
658
|
+
- [ ] **USEQ-DF36238E** — Do not make essential security capabilities a premium or optional path when users reasonably expect safe defaults.
|
|
659
|
+
- [ ] **USEQ-7B592261** — Allow scoped time-bounded exceptions with owner, evidence, compensating controls, and automatic expiry.
|
|
660
|
+
- [ ] **USEQ-C6CEA1DC** — Prevent policy bypass through alternate tools, direct provider access, unmanaged accounts, or emergency paths.
|
|
661
|
+
- [ ] **USEQ-4F850A3C** — Log and review break-glass and exception use.
|
|
662
|
+
- [ ] **USEQ-B8027624** — Keep policy evaluation available and performant enough not to create pressure for bypass.
|
|
663
|
+
- [ ] **USEQ-BBB80D01** — Provide automated remediation where it is safe and transparent.
|
|
664
|
+
- [ ] **USEQ-49857976** — Review whether guardrails continue to address real risk rather than obsolete architecture.
|
|
665
|
+
|
|
666
|
+
### Platform reliability, SLOs, observability, and support
|
|
667
|
+
|
|
668
|
+
- [ ] **USEQ-BA808893** — Define user-centered SLIs and SLOs for critical platform journeys such as build, test, provision, deploy, retrieve secrets, and diagnose incidents.
|
|
669
|
+
- [ ] **USEQ-791F51DA** — Include correctness, latency, availability, freshness, capacity, and support response where relevant.
|
|
670
|
+
- [ ] **USEQ-8121C780** — Ensure platform objectives are compatible with the reliability objectives of dependent products.
|
|
671
|
+
- [ ] **USEQ-B52AE8A4** — Monitor platform dependencies, quotas, certificate expiry, identity, DNS, artifact storage, and control planes.
|
|
672
|
+
- [ ] **USEQ-87EFFA25** — Provide synthetic checks for critical self-service journeys.
|
|
673
|
+
- [ ] **USEQ-263E0518** — Expose service status and known incidents to platform users.
|
|
674
|
+
- [ ] **USEQ-2ADCF482** — Use error budgets or an equivalent policy to balance feature work with reliability work.
|
|
675
|
+
- [ ] **USEQ-40DBA950** — Provide runbooks and on-call ownership for platform components whose failure blocks delivery or recovery.
|
|
676
|
+
- [ ] **USEQ-B6288BBC** — Ensure support personnel can diagnose problems without inappropriate access to product secrets or customer data.
|
|
677
|
+
- [ ] **USEQ-62FDFE99** — Define support channels, hours, severity, escalation, and expected response.
|
|
678
|
+
- [ ] **USEQ-D2E7BAC3** — Capture repeated support requests as product or documentation defects.
|
|
679
|
+
- [ ] **USEQ-98754BDB** — Test platform disaster recovery and restore, including source, configuration, registries, metadata, identity, and signing material.
|
|
680
|
+
- [ ] **USEQ-0B9A6478** — Ensure product teams can continue critical incident response if the normal platform is unavailable.
|
|
681
|
+
- [ ] **USEQ-F7346E05** — Publish maintenance, degradation, and emergency change procedures.
|
|
682
|
+
|
|
683
|
+
### Cognitive load, flow, accessibility, and inclusive tooling
|
|
684
|
+
|
|
685
|
+
- [ ] **USEQ-58A2631E** — Measure whether engineers can understand and complete common tasks without memorizing undocumented system details.
|
|
686
|
+
- [ ] **USEQ-C802111B** — Reduce unnecessary tool switching, duplicate data entry, repeated authentication, and manual translation between systems.
|
|
687
|
+
- [ ] **USEQ-6924F2DC** — Provide clear defaults while revealing advanced options progressively.
|
|
688
|
+
- [ ] **USEQ-C31E7F6F** — Use consistent terminology, navigation, status, and error patterns across engineering tools.
|
|
689
|
+
- [ ] **USEQ-09A914D6** — Keep documentation searchable from the point of need.
|
|
690
|
+
- [ ] **USEQ-A3E724DF** — Protect focus time and minimize unnecessary notifications, approvals, meetings, and interrupt-driven work.
|
|
691
|
+
- [ ] **USEQ-6A7F9660** — Design tooling so users can recover from errors without recreating environments or waiting for privileged intervention.
|
|
692
|
+
- [ ] **USEQ-14E7881C** — Make internal tools keyboard accessible and compatible with relevant assistive technologies.
|
|
693
|
+
- [ ] **USEQ-91534D82** — Provide sufficient contrast, scalable text, non-color cues, captions, and accessible documents in engineering systems.
|
|
694
|
+
- [ ] **USEQ-7C591DBF** — Ensure remote, distributed, part-time, and differently located team members have equivalent access to workflows and information.
|
|
695
|
+
- [ ] **USEQ-CE9D204D** — Avoid relying on informal spoken knowledge, office proximity, or one time zone for essential decisions.
|
|
696
|
+
- [ ] **USEQ-DC4B7B0A** — Provide psychologically safe ways to report friction, errors, and harmful metrics.
|
|
697
|
+
- [ ] **USEQ-DAD6FF8C** — Do not interpret struggle with inaccessible or poorly designed tools as individual underperformance.
|
|
698
|
+
- [ ] **USEQ-C7C144EB** — Include cognitive load, feedback loops, and flow state in improvement research.
|
|
699
|
+
|
|
700
|
+
### Documentation, learning, and knowledge continuity
|
|
701
|
+
|
|
702
|
+
- [ ] **USEQ-4275296E** — Provide task-oriented documentation for common workflows and reference documentation for interfaces and policies.
|
|
703
|
+
- [ ] **USEQ-EB41F750** — Keep one discoverable authoritative source for each instruction or contract.
|
|
704
|
+
- [ ] **USEQ-01E6CBBE** — Generate reference material from source where reliable while retaining reviewed explanations and examples.
|
|
705
|
+
- [ ] **USEQ-3B0A5ED4** — Test documentation examples and commands continuously where practical.
|
|
706
|
+
- [ ] **USEQ-891BB07B** — Label versions, prerequisites, scope, owner, last review date, and known limitations.
|
|
707
|
+
- [ ] **USEQ-726AC92D** — Archive or redirect obsolete documentation so search does not lead users to unsupported paths.
|
|
708
|
+
- [ ] **USEQ-D916210E** — Provide onboarding journeys, architecture overviews, troubleshooting guides, and conceptual explanations.
|
|
709
|
+
- [ ] **USEQ-63D39C0B** — Record material decisions and trade-offs in durable decision records.
|
|
710
|
+
- [ ] **USEQ-33FAD702** — Ensure runbooks identify safe and destructive actions clearly.
|
|
711
|
+
- [ ] **USEQ-24B646C7** — Provide learning environments that cannot affect production or real users.
|
|
712
|
+
- [ ] **USEQ-D82CEC22** — Use communities of practice, office hours, and support channels to supplement—not replace—durable documentation.
|
|
713
|
+
- [ ] **USEQ-2B54E2F5** — Measure documentation task success, search failure, repeated questions, and stale-page reports.
|
|
714
|
+
- [ ] **USEQ-983B5F26** — Plan knowledge transfer before owner changes, organizational moves, or supplier exit.
|
|
715
|
+
- [ ] **USEQ-4BDCFFCF** — Keep emergency and recovery documentation available outside the systems it is needed to restore.
|
|
716
|
+
|
|
717
|
+
### Delivery performance and developer-experience measurement
|
|
718
|
+
|
|
719
|
+
- [ ] **USEQ-CB8F61D4** — Use multiple outcome and experience measures; no single metric represents developer productivity.
|
|
720
|
+
- [ ] **USEQ-7AA62376** — Use DORA delivery metrics at an appropriate service or team level to understand throughput and instability.
|
|
721
|
+
- [ ] **USEQ-B0B6D105** — As of the 2026 DORA model, consider change lead time, deployment frequency, failed deployment recovery time, change fail rate, and deployment rework rate together.
|
|
722
|
+
- [ ] **USEQ-83FDD06F** — Use SPACE dimensions to balance satisfaction and well-being, performance, activity, communication and collaboration, and efficiency and flow.
|
|
723
|
+
- [ ] **USEQ-4586EC60** — Use DevEx dimensions such as feedback loops, cognitive load, and flow state to diagnose friction.
|
|
724
|
+
- [ ] **USEQ-F58BC741** — Combine quantitative telemetry with confidential qualitative research.
|
|
725
|
+
- [ ] **USEQ-20223EB5** — Measure systems and team conditions rather than ranking individuals by commits, lines, tickets, reviews, hours, or tool activity.
|
|
726
|
+
- [ ] **USEQ-95ED4C79** — Do not use activity metrics as direct proxies for value, quality, difficulty, or individual contribution.
|
|
727
|
+
- [ ] **USEQ-D208E392** — Expect measures to change behavior and assess gaming, fear, inequity, and surveillance risk before collection.
|
|
728
|
+
- [ ] **USEQ-2184C875** — Collect only data necessary for the stated improvement purpose and apply privacy, access, retention, and transparency controls.
|
|
729
|
+
- [ ] **USEQ-F3060494** — Segment metrics by workflow and context without exposing or penalizing small groups.
|
|
730
|
+
- [ ] **USEQ-5355662B** — Look for trade-offs: faster throughput can coexist with more rework, instability, burnout, or support burden.
|
|
731
|
+
- [ ] **USEQ-5A698497** — Use trends and experiments to evaluate interventions rather than claiming causality from correlation alone.
|
|
732
|
+
- [ ] **USEQ-CF1326C5** — Publish metric definitions, limitations, owners, and decision rules.
|
|
733
|
+
|
|
734
|
+
### Continuous improvement and value-stream management
|
|
735
|
+
|
|
736
|
+
- [ ] **USEQ-2F8B10C6** — Map the end-to-end path from idea or defect to validated user outcome, including queues, handoffs, approvals, and rework.
|
|
737
|
+
- [ ] **USEQ-B8A5DC21** — Measure touch time, wait time, blocked time, rework, abandonment, and failure demand.
|
|
738
|
+
- [ ] **USEQ-FF953623** — Improve the largest system constraint rather than optimizing local activity that increases downstream queues.
|
|
739
|
+
- [ ] **USEQ-6A5A19D4** — Work in small batches to shorten feedback and reduce integration and rollback risk.
|
|
740
|
+
- [ ] **USEQ-A13C5E1E** — Use experiments with baseline, hypothesis, expected effect, guardrails, and review date.
|
|
741
|
+
- [ ] **USEQ-B517A398** — Include product quality, user value, reliability, security, accessibility, privacy, and team well-being as guardrails.
|
|
742
|
+
- [ ] **USEQ-9C9CBB20** — Review whether standardization removes friction or prevents teams from solving distinct problems.
|
|
743
|
+
- [ ] **USEQ-E325A12A** — Automate repetitive deterministic toil and remove the source of recurring toil where possible.
|
|
744
|
+
- [ ] **USEQ-7ABD2C5B** — Keep manual judgment where ambiguity, ethics, safety, or contextual risk requires it.
|
|
745
|
+
- [ ] **USEQ-DC44A0E3** — Prioritize improvements from observed friction, incident lessons, support demand, and user research.
|
|
746
|
+
- [ ] **USEQ-BD769EB9** — Share successful patterns without declaring them universal before context is understood.
|
|
747
|
+
- [ ] **USEQ-F0AE0BFF** — Retire metrics and processes that no longer lead to useful decisions.
|
|
748
|
+
- [ ] **USEQ-188FE891** — Review improvement effects after enough time to observe adoption and secondary consequences.
|
|
749
|
+
- [ ] **USEQ-441F16D2** — Capture lessons in platform capabilities, policies, documentation, and organization design.
|
|
750
|
+
|
|
751
|
+
### Cost, capacity, and sustainability of engineering systems
|
|
752
|
+
|
|
753
|
+
- [ ] **USEQ-F2A1D89A** — Attribute major platform costs to capabilities and outcomes without creating incentives to hide necessary use.
|
|
754
|
+
- [ ] **USEQ-D68D0A9D** — Forecast build, test, storage, network, runner, artifact, logging, and environment demand.
|
|
755
|
+
- [ ] **USEQ-1A4066FD** — Use quotas and budgets that protect shared resources while allowing legitimate bursts and incident response.
|
|
756
|
+
- [ ] **USEQ-49E28DF3** — Monitor queue saturation, wait time, cache effectiveness, idle environments, abandoned resources, and data growth.
|
|
757
|
+
- [ ] **USEQ-2C2CAF70** — Automatically expire or suspend unused ephemeral resources after a visible grace period.
|
|
758
|
+
- [ ] **USEQ-990ED243** — Keep retention aligned with legal, audit, diagnostic, and reproducibility needs.
|
|
759
|
+
- [ ] **USEQ-344C24AA** — Minimize duplicate artifact, dependency, test-data, and log storage while preserving integrity and provenance.
|
|
760
|
+
- [ ] **USEQ-28FE7C91** — Choose efficient architectures and workload scheduling without shifting hidden cost to developers or product reliability.
|
|
761
|
+
- [ ] **USEQ-3B939CA0** — Measure environmental and resource impact where material and avoid unsupported sustainability claims.
|
|
762
|
+
- [ ] **USEQ-69D55612** — Plan capacity for organizational growth, launch spikes, regional failure, and supplier quotas.
|
|
763
|
+
- [ ] **USEQ-39710937** — Ensure cost controls cannot silently delete evidence, disable security checks, or block emergency recovery.
|
|
764
|
+
- [ ] **USEQ-514E0CD0** — Review supplier pricing, egress, licensing, and exit costs before deep integration.
|
|
765
|
+
- [ ] **USEQ-07373DFE** — Provide teams with actionable cost visibility and safe optimization guidance.
|
|
766
|
+
- [ ] **USEQ-BBCAACB3** — Validate cost improvements against delivery, quality, reliability, and developer-experience guardrails.
|
|
767
|
+
|
|
768
|
+
### Portability, interoperability, and escape paths
|
|
769
|
+
|
|
770
|
+
- [ ] **USEQ-0E1655B8** — Document dependencies on proprietary APIs, formats, identity, networking, build services, registries, and control planes.
|
|
771
|
+
- [ ] **USEQ-8A0CF5CF** — Use open or well-documented interfaces where they materially reduce lock-in and improve interoperability.
|
|
772
|
+
- [ ] **USEQ-4018176E** — Keep source, configuration, metadata, artifacts, logs, and data exportable in usable forms.
|
|
773
|
+
- [ ] **USEQ-91A133AE** — Test restore or reconstruction outside the primary platform when continuity objectives require it.
|
|
774
|
+
- [ ] **USEQ-97037A86** — Define which platform abstractions intentionally hide provider details and which provider capabilities remain visible.
|
|
775
|
+
- [ ] **USEQ-49BA0A1C** — Avoid lowest-common-denominator abstractions that remove valuable capability without a real portability requirement.
|
|
776
|
+
- [ ] **USEQ-54067417** — Provide escape hatches that preserve essential security, audit, and ownership controls.
|
|
777
|
+
- [ ] **USEQ-AC2E75BF** — Document the operational burden transferred to teams that leave the recommended path.
|
|
778
|
+
- [ ] **USEQ-F300483C** — Keep external interfaces versioned independently of internal implementation where practical.
|
|
779
|
+
- [ ] **USEQ-47566BF2** — Maintain replacement and exit plans for critical suppliers and unsupported internal tools.
|
|
780
|
+
- [ ] **USEQ-30CCD67D** — Assess whether platform failure can prevent access to source, builds, deployment, observability, or recovery simultaneously.
|
|
781
|
+
- [ ] **USEQ-9934131E** — Prevent one identity or control-plane dependency from becoming the only emergency path.
|
|
782
|
+
- [ ] **USEQ-6EAB87B3** — Rehearse migration of at least the most critical artifacts and metadata.
|
|
783
|
+
- [ ] **USEQ-746C0E26** — Review portability requirements based on business continuity and bargaining risk, not ideology.
|
|
784
|
+
|
|
785
|
+
### Lifecycle, deprecation, and platform retirement
|
|
786
|
+
|
|
787
|
+
- [ ] **USEQ-D19BE27B** — Publish lifecycle states such as experimental, supported, deprecated, maintenance-only, and retired.
|
|
788
|
+
- [ ] **USEQ-9372CB8C** — Define support and compatibility expectations for each state.
|
|
789
|
+
- [ ] **USEQ-A7ABBFA6** — Identify actual consumers before deprecation and communicate through channels they use.
|
|
790
|
+
- [ ] **USEQ-8D189C10** — Provide migration tooling, documentation, examples, validation, and support.
|
|
791
|
+
- [ ] **USEQ-669B7C08** — Monitor remaining use and unknown consumers.
|
|
792
|
+
- [ ] **USEQ-6EE88A72** — Avoid indefinite dual operation without explicit cost and risk acceptance.
|
|
793
|
+
- [ ] **USEQ-68A53B3C** — Preserve required artifacts, evidence, audit history, and data during retirement.
|
|
794
|
+
- [ ] **USEQ-5AD5C402** — Revoke credentials, identities, network access, secrets, signing keys, webhooks, and automation associated with retired capabilities.
|
|
795
|
+
- [ ] **USEQ-45B505EF** — Delete or archive obsolete resources according to retention and privacy requirements.
|
|
796
|
+
- [ ] **USEQ-FF09ED1C** — Remove old paths from templates, documentation, policy, onboarding, and catalogs.
|
|
797
|
+
- [ ] **USEQ-7CBE6D66** — Confirm that retirement does not break incident recovery or historical rebuilds.
|
|
798
|
+
- [ ] **USEQ-36237DAD** — Review lessons from adoption, support, and retirement before replacing the capability.
|
|
799
|
+
- [ ] **USEQ-69BACE4D** — Keep a rollback window until migration validation is complete.
|
|
800
|
+
- [ ] **USEQ-C42204DA** — Reassign ownership explicitly when platform responsibilities move between teams or suppliers.
|
|
801
|
+
|
|
802
|
+
### Platform and developer-experience release blockers
|
|
803
|
+
|
|
804
|
+
- [ ] **USEQ-CB04A4EC** — Block rollout when the platform cannot identify owners, affected users, supported scope, or recovery responsibility.
|
|
805
|
+
- [ ] **USEQ-0CD5999D** — Block rollout when a mandatory path is less secure or less reliable than the path it replaces.
|
|
806
|
+
- [ ] **USEQ-A882ABAF** — Block rollout when self-service can create irreversible, privileged, publicly exposed, or unowned resources without adequate controls.
|
|
807
|
+
- [ ] **USEQ-24631885** — Block rollout when critical workflows cannot be diagnosed or recovered without the unavailable platform itself.
|
|
808
|
+
- [ ] **USEQ-742B58F7** — Block rollout when generated templates contain unsupported, vulnerable, unlicensed, or unowned components.
|
|
809
|
+
- [ ] **USEQ-7A5FFA5E** — Block rollout when policy enforcement produces material false positives without a working exception and support process.
|
|
810
|
+
- [ ] **USEQ-FF503F0F** — Block rollout when adoption is measured only by mandate or activity and user outcomes are unknown.
|
|
811
|
+
- [ ] **USEQ-DA19EDF9** — Block rollout when accessibility barriers prevent authorized engineers from completing essential tasks.
|
|
812
|
+
- [ ] **USEQ-9863D445** — Block rollout when telemetry constitutes undisclosed individual surveillance or creates harmful performance incentives.
|
|
813
|
+
- [ ] **USEQ-DE6F930B** — Require evidence from representative teams, including first-time users and high-risk workflows.
|
|
814
|
+
- [ ] **USEQ-34527B32** — Require documented SLOs, on-call ownership, rollback, support, migration, and deprecation plans for critical platform services.
|
|
815
|
+
- [ ] **USEQ-5EBA2B57** — Confirm that product teams retain enough knowledge and access to operate and recover their systems.
|
|
816
|
+
- [ ] **USEQ-7EA98BC7** — Confirm that cost, capacity, identity, supplier, and concentration risks are understood and accepted.
|
|
817
|
+
- [ ] **USEQ-08C12DD5** — Confirm that the platform improves the total value stream rather than only the platform team’s local metrics.
|
|
818
|
+
|
|
819
|
+
## Final Gap Closure — IT Asset Management, Configuration Management, and Toolchain Trust
|
|
820
|
+
|
|
821
|
+
_Consolidated from `final consolidated corpus/07-delivery-configuration-platform-developer-experience-cicd.md#Final Gap Closure — IT Asset Management, Configuration Management, and Toolchain Trust`; 127 non-duplicative controls._
|
|
822
|
+
|
|
823
|
+
### IT and software asset governance
|
|
824
|
+
|
|
825
|
+
- [ ] **USEQ-47D22600** — Define the assets governed across hardware, software, cloud, data, identities, certificates, domains, repositories, build systems, services, licenses, documentation, and suppliers.
|
|
826
|
+
- [ ] **USEQ-5EFC0327** — Assign an accountable owner, custodian, business purpose, criticality, lifecycle state, location, and support status to each material asset.
|
|
827
|
+
- [ ] **USEQ-6327CC41** — Maintain one authoritative or reconciled asset inventory with unique identifiers.
|
|
828
|
+
- [ ] **USEQ-F339AB78** — Discover assets continuously enough to detect unknown, abandoned, duplicated, shadow, and unauthorized resources.
|
|
829
|
+
- [ ] **USEQ-4408FB18** — Reconcile technical discovery with financial, procurement, identity, network, configuration, and service records.
|
|
830
|
+
- [ ] **USEQ-60452413** — Record relationships among assets, services, data, owners, dependencies, contracts, and customers.
|
|
831
|
+
- [ ] **USEQ-2FC61C58** — Classify assets by confidentiality, integrity, availability, privacy, safety, financial, and legal impact.
|
|
832
|
+
- [ ] **USEQ-BBF0269D** — Define lifecycle states and required controls from request and acquisition through deployment, operation, transfer, retirement, and disposal.
|
|
833
|
+
- [ ] **USEQ-E3B57237** — Prevent an asset from entering production without ownership, support, monitoring, security, backup, and retirement expectations.
|
|
834
|
+
- [ ] **USEQ-6DD907B9** — Review inventory completeness and accuracy periodically and after major organizational or platform change.
|
|
835
|
+
- [ ] **USEQ-D7D10F08** — Protect the asset inventory because it contains sensitive architecture and ownership information.
|
|
836
|
+
- [ ] **USEQ-A91E76D3** — Preserve historical asset and ownership state for incident, audit, cost, and lifecycle analysis.
|
|
837
|
+
|
|
838
|
+
### Acquisition, entitlement, and licensing
|
|
839
|
+
|
|
840
|
+
- [ ] **USEQ-C2BEC642** — Link acquired assets to approved requirements, funding, supplier, contract, entitlement, and accountable owner.
|
|
841
|
+
- [ ] **USEQ-BDA3E93B** — Verify license, subscription, support, geographic, user, device, capacity, environment, and redistribution rights before use.
|
|
842
|
+
- [ ] **USEQ-9F40C6C0** — Track renewal, notice, termination, price-adjustment, true-up, support, and end-of-life dates.
|
|
843
|
+
- [ ] **USEQ-90D325A9** — Prevent unauthorized software, services, plugins, packages, and devices from becoming production dependencies.
|
|
844
|
+
- [ ] **USEQ-C68F693C** — Identify free, trial, community, and evaluation services that lack production rights or support.
|
|
845
|
+
- [ ] **USEQ-A87D5AB1** — Avoid collecting more licenses or cloud capacity than can be governed responsibly.
|
|
846
|
+
- [ ] **USEQ-F929714B** — Detect under-licensing, over-licensing, duplicate subscriptions, dormant seats, and unused reserved capacity.
|
|
847
|
+
- [ ] **USEQ-C3E997C5** — Record supplier and product identifiers sufficiently to distinguish similarly named assets.
|
|
848
|
+
- [ ] **USEQ-20E81856** — Retain proof of entitlement and contractual terms for the required period.
|
|
849
|
+
- [ ] **USEQ-0B64BF62** — Ensure acquisition terms cover continuity, security updates, data return, audit, and exit where material.
|
|
850
|
+
|
|
851
|
+
### Asset assignment, custody, and use
|
|
852
|
+
|
|
853
|
+
- [ ] **USEQ-D738D8F6** — Assign individual custody for portable assets and privileged credentials where appropriate.
|
|
854
|
+
- [ ] **USEQ-40C843EB** — Record transfers, loans, repairs, loss, return, reassignment, and disposal.
|
|
855
|
+
- [ ] **USEQ-7D4EF0D8** — Require users to acknowledge handling responsibilities proportionate to sensitivity.
|
|
856
|
+
- [ ] **USEQ-11330086** — Restrict asset use to authorized purposes and environments.
|
|
857
|
+
- [ ] **USEQ-9D66D98F** — Prevent production assets from being repurposed for testing without controlled sanitization and approval.
|
|
858
|
+
- [ ] **USEQ-61F13688** — Ensure shared assets have clear administration, accountability, and access records.
|
|
859
|
+
- [ ] **USEQ-95BBBD9D** — Reconcile assets during personnel, supplier, office, and organizational transitions.
|
|
860
|
+
- [ ] **USEQ-1102BC52** — Investigate missing, stale, unresponsive, or ownerless assets.
|
|
861
|
+
- [ ] **USEQ-F82AEC89** — Revoke access and recover assets promptly during offboarding.
|
|
862
|
+
|
|
863
|
+
### Software, service, and cloud asset lifecycle
|
|
864
|
+
|
|
865
|
+
- [ ] **USEQ-BCC8A948** — Inventory deployed applications, services, libraries, images, functions, jobs, APIs, endpoints, agents, and management planes.
|
|
866
|
+
- [ ] **USEQ-F0FA28E9** — Record exact versions, editions, regions, accounts, projects, environments, and deployment identifiers.
|
|
867
|
+
- [ ] **USEQ-2C9BCEDC** — Identify unsupported, end-of-life, unmaintained, and unpatchable components.
|
|
868
|
+
- [ ] **USEQ-404CE25B** — Track public exposure and externally reachable management interfaces.
|
|
869
|
+
- [ ] **USEQ-DBD981E5** — Identify software installed outside approved deployment or package mechanisms.
|
|
870
|
+
- [ ] **USEQ-4521F0FD** — Detect abandoned cloud resources, storage, addresses, domains, certificates, secrets, snapshots, and service accounts.
|
|
871
|
+
- [ ] **USEQ-53BFB44D** — Link every running workload to reviewed source, build provenance, artifact, configuration, owner, and service.
|
|
872
|
+
- [ ] **USEQ-7E25ABA0** — Maintain approved and prohibited technology lists with documented exception processes.
|
|
873
|
+
- [ ] **USEQ-59EF6776** — Define patch, upgrade, replacement, and retirement plans before support expires.
|
|
874
|
+
- [ ] **USEQ-DE68E9CE** — Verify that decommissioning removes traffic, access, data, credentials, billing, monitoring, DNS, and dependencies.
|
|
875
|
+
- [ ] **USEQ-B7D56A01** — Retain required historical artifacts and documentation for support and investigation.
|
|
876
|
+
|
|
877
|
+
### Configuration-management planning
|
|
878
|
+
|
|
879
|
+
- [ ] **USEQ-70E4676E** — Define which products, components, documents, schemas, models, infrastructure, policies, and tools are configuration items.
|
|
880
|
+
- [ ] **USEQ-9E197CB5** — Assign unique identifiers and version conventions to configuration items.
|
|
881
|
+
- [ ] **USEQ-16AFEC0D** — Define authoritative repositories and custodians for each configuration-item class.
|
|
882
|
+
- [ ] **USEQ-A9FA1137** — Establish baselines at meaningful lifecycle and release points.
|
|
883
|
+
- [ ] **USEQ-ADC79C0E** — Define who may propose, review, approve, implement, verify, and audit changes.
|
|
884
|
+
- [ ] **USEQ-A2BA66FC** — Scale control rigor according to criticality and consequence.
|
|
885
|
+
- [ ] **USEQ-C21F7C87** — Include supplier-provided and customer-controlled configuration where it affects outcomes.
|
|
886
|
+
- [ ] **USEQ-205CA0F6** — Define emergency and temporary-change procedures with retrospective review and expiry.
|
|
887
|
+
- [ ] **USEQ-AA3E4353** — Document configuration relationships and compatibility constraints.
|
|
888
|
+
- [ ] **USEQ-BB179760** — Preserve the configuration-management plan and evidence with the product lifecycle record.
|
|
889
|
+
|
|
890
|
+
### Configuration identification and baselines
|
|
891
|
+
|
|
892
|
+
- [ ] **USEQ-33E78AD8** — Identify every item required to reproduce, operate, support, verify, recover, and retire a release.
|
|
893
|
+
- [ ] **USEQ-989F2CFE** — Include source, dependencies, build definitions, tool versions, infrastructure, schema, data migrations, runtime configuration, flags, secrets references, certificates, models, prompts, documentation, and tests as applicable.
|
|
894
|
+
- [ ] **USEQ-4BC4CCAE** — Record immutable digests or equivalent identifiers for deployable and evidentiary artifacts.
|
|
895
|
+
- [ ] **USEQ-6A253B4C** — Define which parts of a baseline are immutable and which may change operationally.
|
|
896
|
+
- [ ] **USEQ-DCF98B7D** — Include environment-specific configuration and external-service versions in the operational baseline.
|
|
897
|
+
- [ ] **USEQ-899A62A9** — Prevent ambiguous labels such as “latest,” “current,” or “production” from being the sole identifier.
|
|
898
|
+
- [ ] **USEQ-5823C219** — Maintain links among requirements, changes, configuration items, builds, tests, approvals, and deployments.
|
|
899
|
+
- [ ] **USEQ-D50778E8** — Preserve prior known-good baselines needed for rollback and investigation.
|
|
900
|
+
- [ ] **USEQ-0889583B** — Detect missing, duplicate, conflicting, and orphaned configuration records.
|
|
901
|
+
- [ ] **USEQ-709323D1** — Verify the documented baseline against the actual deployed state.
|
|
902
|
+
|
|
903
|
+
### Change control and configuration status accounting
|
|
904
|
+
|
|
905
|
+
- [ ] **USEQ-FC3E698D** — Require every material configuration change to state purpose, scope, risk, dependencies, testing, rollout, rollback, owner, and approval.
|
|
906
|
+
- [ ] **USEQ-43388938** — Assess impacts across components, data, users, suppliers, obligations, documentation, and operations.
|
|
907
|
+
- [ ] **USEQ-79CA7209** — Prevent unauthorized direct change to controlled production configuration.
|
|
908
|
+
- [ ] **USEQ-504287F4** — Record who changed what, when, why, from which previous state, and with what result.
|
|
909
|
+
- [ ] **USEQ-A2D17FE8** — Track proposed, approved, implemented, verified, deployed, rolled-back, superseded, and retired states.
|
|
910
|
+
- [ ] **USEQ-E33E127B** — Ensure rejected and canceled changes cannot be deployed accidentally.
|
|
911
|
+
- [ ] **USEQ-11CF89FF** — Detect and reconcile configuration drift.
|
|
912
|
+
- [ ] **USEQ-A049228C** — Make emergency changes visible and subject to prompt retrospective review.
|
|
913
|
+
- [ ] **USEQ-755987E5** — Ensure temporary settings, elevated access, diagnostics, and feature flags expire or are removed.
|
|
914
|
+
- [ ] **USEQ-71E0C724** — Report baseline status, open deviations, pending changes, and unresolved discrepancies to decision-makers.
|
|
915
|
+
- [ ] **USEQ-D0653183** — Prevent change records from being closed before implementation and verification evidence exists.
|
|
916
|
+
|
|
917
|
+
### Configuration verification and audit
|
|
918
|
+
|
|
919
|
+
- [ ] **USEQ-3117AB90** — Verify that each baseline is complete, internally consistent, approved, retrievable, and reproducible.
|
|
920
|
+
- [ ] **USEQ-FEC62FEC** — Compare deployed, running, documented, and approved configuration.
|
|
921
|
+
- [ ] **USEQ-F752B649** — Audit whether change-control procedures were followed and effective.
|
|
922
|
+
- [ ] **USEQ-2F4DE3A8** — Verify that generated artifacts can be traced to declared inputs and tools.
|
|
923
|
+
- [ ] **USEQ-8CD13776** — Detect unapproved components, hidden defaults, local patches, manual edits, and undocumented overrides.
|
|
924
|
+
- [ ] **USEQ-0C0D4B9F** — Verify that rollback artifacts, migrations, keys, and documentation remain usable.
|
|
925
|
+
- [ ] **USEQ-9886EAF3** — Sample high-risk settings for secure and correct values.
|
|
926
|
+
- [ ] **USEQ-3082692A** — Reconcile configuration after incidents, failover, disaster recovery, and provider restoration.
|
|
927
|
+
- [ ] **USEQ-94277832** — Record discrepancies, owners, corrective actions, and effectiveness checks.
|
|
928
|
+
- [ ] **USEQ-868E9E2E** — Treat inability to identify the production baseline as a release blocker.
|
|
929
|
+
|
|
930
|
+
### Engineering-tool inventory and qualification
|
|
931
|
+
|
|
932
|
+
- [ ] **USEQ-C2FBDFF0** — Inventory tools that can create, modify, test, approve, build, sign, deploy, monitor, diagnose, migrate, or destroy production assets.
|
|
933
|
+
- [ ] **USEQ-35C25338** — Classify tools by the consequence of incorrect output, compromise, unavailability, or misuse.
|
|
934
|
+
- [ ] **USEQ-5A38E631** — Record tool owner, supplier, version, configuration, privileges, data access, support status, and integrations.
|
|
935
|
+
- [ ] **USEQ-92D287A4** — Define expected behavior and acceptance criteria for tools whose output supports critical decisions.
|
|
936
|
+
- [ ] **USEQ-190FA346** — Validate or qualify tools proportionate to their role and risk.
|
|
937
|
+
- [ ] **USEQ-53E9BA34** — Independently verify tool output when an undetected tool error could create unacceptable harm.
|
|
938
|
+
- [ ] **USEQ-5BF8AE95** — Use known-answer tests, reference cases, cross-tool comparison, or manual review where appropriate.
|
|
939
|
+
- [ ] **USEQ-31FA56CF** — Record tool limitations, false-positive and false-negative behavior, unsupported inputs, and operating constraints.
|
|
940
|
+
- [ ] **USEQ-6B714CFD** — Requalify tools after material version, configuration, plugin, model, rule-set, or environment changes.
|
|
941
|
+
- [ ] **USEQ-3BCEA6C5** — Prevent unreviewed extensions and plugins from gaining toolchain privileges.
|
|
942
|
+
- [ ] **USEQ-64FCAB05** — Verify AI-assisted tools separately for the tasks and context in which their output is relied upon.
|
|
943
|
+
|
|
944
|
+
### Toolchain access and integrity
|
|
945
|
+
|
|
946
|
+
- [ ] **USEQ-5B569CEA** — Use individual identities and strong authentication for engineering and management tools.
|
|
947
|
+
- [ ] **USEQ-BCD3314F** — Apply least privilege to repositories, pipelines, registries, signing, deployment, cloud, data, and monitoring systems.
|
|
948
|
+
- [ ] **USEQ-46326F4E** — Separate untrusted contribution contexts from secrets and production authority.
|
|
949
|
+
- [ ] **USEQ-DB33526C** — Protect tool configuration, policies, workflows, rules, and plugins with review and version control.
|
|
950
|
+
- [ ] **USEQ-1D612C9C** — Record administrative and high-impact tool actions.
|
|
951
|
+
- [ ] **USEQ-2CD634D1** — Monitor unusual access, token use, configuration change, artifact publication, and approval behavior.
|
|
952
|
+
- [ ] **USEQ-32C3102B** — Rotate and revoke tool credentials, tokens, certificates, deploy keys, and integration secrets.
|
|
953
|
+
- [ ] **USEQ-D268F72B** — Prevent one compromised tool from silently changing source, tests, artifacts, and evidence without independent detection.
|
|
954
|
+
- [ ] **USEQ-5AC58356** — Use artifact signing, provenance, immutable logs, separation of duties, or equivalent controls to reduce toolchain trust concentration.
|
|
955
|
+
- [ ] **USEQ-2E9EE695** — Back up and test recovery of repositories, configurations, pipelines, registries, evidence, and documentation.
|
|
956
|
+
- [ ] **USEQ-D8872F98** — Maintain alternate access and recovery methods for identity-provider or control-plane failure.
|
|
957
|
+
- [ ] **USEQ-9EF2F036** — Include toolchain compromise in incident-response and continuity exercises.
|
|
958
|
+
|
|
959
|
+
### Toolchain availability, performance, and developer safety
|
|
960
|
+
|
|
961
|
+
- [ ] **USEQ-714190FE** — Define service objectives for critical engineering tools and workflows.
|
|
962
|
+
- [ ] **USEQ-6879B287** — Monitor availability, latency, queueing, capacity, error rate, and data integrity.
|
|
963
|
+
- [ ] **USEQ-00E9100D** — Avoid making one tool or administrator the sole path to build, release, restore, or investigate.
|
|
964
|
+
- [ ] **USEQ-7213309B** — Provide safe degraded workflows for urgent security or recovery work.
|
|
965
|
+
- [ ] **USEQ-0D23F8EE** — Prevent tool outages from encouraging uncontrolled local workarounds or secret sharing.
|
|
966
|
+
- [ ] **USEQ-44ACC81E** — Protect developers from misleading partial success, stale results, and silently skipped checks.
|
|
967
|
+
- [ ] **USEQ-CC01C62E** — Make required gates, failures, retries, and evidence status clear.
|
|
968
|
+
- [ ] **USEQ-D478B533** — Preserve work and allow safe resumption after interruption.
|
|
969
|
+
- [ ] **USEQ-E66C02D0** — Test toolchain recovery and backlog processing after outage.
|
|
970
|
+
- [ ] **USEQ-AACF05BE** — Capacity-plan repositories, runners, registries, logs, artifact stores, and test environments.
|
|
971
|
+
|
|
972
|
+
### Retirement, disposal, and audit
|
|
973
|
+
|
|
974
|
+
- [ ] **USEQ-7B9E1A6F** — Define retirement criteria for assets, configurations, tools, services, licenses, and platforms.
|
|
975
|
+
- [ ] **USEQ-392818A7** — Confirm dependencies and consumers before retirement.
|
|
976
|
+
- [ ] **USEQ-C4ACDFF7** — Preserve required data, records, evidence, source, artifacts, keys, and documentation.
|
|
977
|
+
- [ ] **USEQ-B87013D8** — Remove access, integrations, routes, accounts, credentials, certificates, data, backups, and billing according to the retirement plan.
|
|
978
|
+
- [ ] **USEQ-72EC7BEC** — Sanitize or destroy physical and logical storage appropriately.
|
|
979
|
+
- [ ] **USEQ-A40FB25C** — Update inventories, ownership, diagrams, support records, and financial systems.
|
|
980
|
+
- [ ] **USEQ-D5B4C02F** — Verify no production traffic or authoritative updates still reach the retired asset.
|
|
981
|
+
- [ ] **USEQ-2581CD16** — Monitor for attempted use after retirement.
|
|
982
|
+
- [ ] **USEQ-06B4C16D** — Record residual obligations and retained components.
|
|
983
|
+
- [ ] **USEQ-AB436474** — Audit asset and configuration processes for completeness, accuracy, timeliness, and control effectiveness.
|
|
984
|
+
- [ ] **USEQ-662CE68B** — Treat unknown critical assets, unsupported production technology, untraceable configuration, or unqualified high-impact tools as no-go conditions.
|
|
985
|
+
|
|
986
|
+
## Standards and source references
|
|
987
|
+
|
|
988
|
+
- [ISO/IEC/IEEE 12207:2026 — Software life cycle processes](https://www.iso.org/standard/90219.html)
|
|
989
|
+
- [ISO/IEC 20246:2017 — Work product reviews](https://www.iso.org/standard/67597.html)
|
|
990
|
+
- [NIST SP 800-218 v1.1 — Secure Software Development Framework](https://csrc.nist.gov/pubs/sp/800/218/final)
|
|
991
|
+
- [SLSA Specification 1.2](https://slsa.dev/spec/v1.2/)
|
|
992
|
+
- [OpenSSF Security Baseline and Best Practices](https://baseline.openssf.org/)
|
|
993
|
+
- [ISO/IEC 27001:2022 — Information security management systems](https://www.iso.org/standard/27001)
|
|
994
|
+
- [DORA software delivery performance research](https://dora.dev/guides/dora-metrics/)
|
|
995
|
+
- [ISO/IEC 20000-1:2018 — Service management system requirements](https://www.iso.org/standard/70636.html)
|
|
996
|
+
- [NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0](https://www.nist.gov/cyberframework)
|
|
997
|
+
- [Google SRE Workbook — Implementing SLOs](https://sre.google/workbook/implementing-slos/)
|
|
998
|
+
- [ISO/IEC 25012:2008 — Data quality model](https://www.iso.org/standard/35736.html)
|
|
999
|
+
- [ISO/IEC/IEEE 29119-2:2021 — Test processes](https://www.iso.org/standard/79428.html)
|
|
1000
|
+
- [ISO 22301:2019 — Business continuity management systems](https://www.iso.org/standard/75106.html)
|
|
1001
|
+
- [DORA platform engineering capability](https://dora.dev/capabilities/platform-engineering/)
|
|
1002
|
+
- [DORA research](https://dora.dev/research/)
|
|
1003
|
+
- [CNCF Platforms White Paper](https://tag-app-delivery.cncf.io/whitepapers/platforms/)
|
|
1004
|
+
- [CNCF Platform Engineering Maturity Model](https://tag-app-delivery.cncf.io/whitepapers/platform-eng-maturity-model/)
|
|
1005
|
+
- [ACM Queue — DevEx: What Actually Drives Productivity](https://queue.acm.org/detail.cfm?id=3595878)
|
|
1006
|
+
- [IEEE Computer Society SWEBOK v4](https://www.computer.org/education/bodies-of-knowledge/software-engineering)
|
|
1007
|
+
- [GAO Cost Estimating and Assessment Guide](https://www.gao.gov/products/gao-20-195g)
|
|
1008
|
+
- [GAO Schedule Assessment Guide](https://www.gao.gov/products/gao-16-89g)
|
|
1009
|
+
- [NIST SP 800-161 Rev. 1 — Cybersecurity Supply Chain Risk Management](https://csrc.nist.gov/pubs/sp/800/161/r1/final)
|
|
1010
|
+
|
|
1011
|
+
---
|
|
1012
|
+
|
|
1013
|
+
[Previous phase](10-verification-and-testing.md) · [Next: Phase 12: Operations, SRE, and support](12-operations-sre-and-support.md)
|