@maci-protocol/website 0.0.0-ci.2d2f5fb → 0.0.0-ci.30921aa

package/versioned_docs/version-v3.x/core-concepts/poll-types.md

@@ -5,25 +5,25 @@ sidebar_label: Poll types
 sidebar_position: 9
 ---
 
-MACI allows to conduct polls in both a quadratic voting and non quadratic voting fashion. One should be aware that the only distinction between the two happens when messages are processed and votes tallied. On top of that, the Tally smart contract has been split into two different ones, with the non quadratic voting version one being slightly smaller, due to the need of one less function.
+MACI allows to conduct polls in both a quadratic voting and non quadratic voting fashion. One should be aware that the only distinction between the two happens when messages are processed and votes tallied. On top of that, the Tally smart contract has been split into two different ones, with the non quadratic voting version one being slightly smaller, due to the need of one less function. Additionally, there is a variation of non quadratic voting that allows participants to cast their entire voice credit balance for a single option only.
 
 This document will explain how to use each of these options. Hardhat tasks are the currently recommended way to deploy contracts and run polls but you can also use the MACI cli.
 
 ## Quadratic Voting
 
-MACI has always worked with quadratic voting. Users signing up to MACI are assigned a number of voice credits based on certain conditions (enforced by the [initial voice credit proxy contract](https://github.com/privacy-scaling-explorations/maci/blob/dev/contracts/contracts/initialVoiceCreditProxy/InitialVoiceCreditProxy.sol)), and after each vote, the number of voice credits is reduced by the square of the weight of the vote casted. For instance, if the vote weight is 5, a user must have at least 25 voice credits to cast the vote.
+MACI has always worked with quadratic voting. Users signing up to MACI are assigned a number of voice credits based on certain conditions (enforced by the [initial voice credit proxy contract](https://github.com/privacy-scaling-explorations/maci/blob/dev/packages/contracts/contracts/initialVoiceCreditProxy/ConstantInitialVoiceCreditProxy.sol)), and after each vote, the number of voice credits is reduced by the square of the weight of the vote casted. For instance, if the vote weight is 5, a user must have at least 25 voice credits to cast the vote.
 
 To run a poll with quadratic voting, the coordinator must deploy the Poll with the mode set to quadratic voting.
 
 ### Using Hardhat tasks
 
-In the deploy-config.json file set the `useQuadraticVoting` value to **true**.
+In the deploy-config.json file set the `mode` value to **qv**.
 
 ```json
 "Poll": {
     "pollDuration": 604800,
     "coordinatorPublicKey": "macipk",
-    "useQuadraticVoting": true
+    "mode": "qv"
 }
 ```
 
@@ -37,17 +37,41 @@ pnpm deploy-poll:NETWORK
 
 The non quadratic voting option is a new feature that has been added to MACI with the v1.2 release. It allows to conduct polls without the quadratic voting mechanism. This means that the number of voice credits is not reduced by the square of the weight of the vote casted. This option is useful for polls where the quadratic voting mechanism is not necessary, and it is also slightly cheaper for coordinators to tally votes, as there are less checks required in the Tally smart contract.
 
-To run a poll with non quadratic voting, the coordinator must set the `useQuadraticVoting` parameter to `false` when creating the MACI instance. This will make the MACI instance use the `TallyNonQv` smart contract, which is a smaller version of the `Tally` smart contract, as it does not require the checks for the quadratic voting mechanism.
+To run a poll with non quadratic voting, the coordinator must set the `mode` parameter to `non-qv` when creating the MACI instance. This will make the MACI instance use the `TallyNonQv` smart contract, which is a smaller version of the `Tally` smart contract, as it does not require the checks for the quadratic voting mechanism.
 
 ### Using Hardhat tasks
 
-In the deploy-config.json file set the `useQuadraticVoting` value to **false**.
+In the deploy-config.json file set the `mode` value to **non-qv**.
 
 ```json
 "Poll": {
     "pollDuration": 604800,
     "coordinatorPublicKey": "macipk",
-    "useQuadraticVoting": false
+    "mode": "non-qv"
+}
+```
+
+Then run the task to create a poll:
+
+```bash
+pnpm deploy-poll:NETWORK
+```
+
+## Full Credits Voting
+
+Full Credits Voting is a new feature introduced in MACI v3. This voting mode disables the quadratic voting mechanism and requires participants to allocate their entire voice credit balance to a single option. Unlike quadratic voting, where the cost of votes increases quadratically with the number of votes cast, Full Credits Voting uses a linear model: participants spend all their available voice credits on one chosen option. No splitting across multiple options is allowed. This option is useful for polls where the quadratic voting mechanism is not necessary and where it's important to ensure voters fully commit to a single choice—eliminating fragmented or spread-out voting behavior. It also offers a slight cost advantage for coordinators, as tallying is more efficient with fewer checks required in the Tally smart contract.
+
+To run a poll full credits voting, the coordinator must set the `mode` parameter to `full` when creating the MACI instance. This will make the MACI instance use the `TallyNonQv` smart contract, which is a smaller version of the `Tally` smart contract, as it does not require the checks for the quadratic voting mechanism.
+
+### Using Hardhat tasks
+
+In the deploy-config.json file set the `mode` value to **full**.
+
+```json
+"Poll": {
+    "pollDuration": 604800,
+    "coordinatorPublicKey": "macipk",
+    "mode": "full"
 }
 ```
 

package/versioned_docs/version-v3.x/core-concepts/polls.md

@@ -11,7 +11,7 @@ Currently, you can configure the following parameters for a poll:
 
 - Poll duration, in the form of a unix timestamp for start and end times. This allows polls to be scheduled to start at a certain time, and run for a certain amount of time.
 - Vote option - how many vote options are allowed for a poll.
-- Vote mode - quadratic or non quadratic voting. One should be aware that the only distinction between the two happens when messages are processed and votes tallied.
+- Vote mode - quadratic, non quadratic, full credits voting. One should be aware that the only distinction between them happens when messages are processed and votes tallied.
 - Policy - the Excubiae policy that will be used to gate access to the poll.
 - Initial voice credit proxy - the initial voice credit proxy that will be used to assign voice credits to voters.
 - Relayer - the list of addresses that will be able to relay messages on behalf of other users (for now this is recommended to be the coordinator only)
@@ -34,19 +34,19 @@ The full configuration for a poll looks like this:
 
 ## Quadratic Voting
 
-MACI has always worked with quadratic voting. Users joining a Poll are assigned a number of voice credits based on certain conditions (enforced by the [initial voice credit proxy contract](https://github.com/privacy-scaling-explorations/maci/blob/dev/contracts/contracts/initialVoiceCreditProxy/InitialVoiceCreditProxy.sol)), and after each vote, the number of voice credits is reduced by the square of the weight of the vote casted. For instance, if the vote weight is 5, a user must have at least 25 voice credits to cast the vote.
+MACI has always worked with quadratic voting. Users joining a Poll are assigned a number of voice credits based on certain conditions (enforced by the [initial voice credit proxy contract](https://github.com/privacy-scaling-explorations/maci/blob/dev/packages/contracts/contracts/initialVoiceCreditProxy/ConstantInitialVoiceCreditProxy.sol)), and after each vote, the number of voice credits is reduced by the square of the weight of the vote casted. For instance, if the vote weight is 5, a user must have at least 25 voice credits to cast the vote.
 
 To run a poll with quadratic voting, the coordinator must deploy the Poll with the mode set to quadratic voting.
 
 ### Using Hardhat tasks
 
-In the deploy-config.json file set the `useQuadraticVoting` value to **true**.
+In the deploy-config.json file set the `mode` value to **qv**.
 
 ```json
 "Poll": {
     [...]
     "coordinatorPublicKey": "macipk",
-    "useQuadraticVoting": true
+    "mode": "qv"
 }
 ```
 
@@ -60,17 +60,41 @@ pnpm deploy-poll:NETWORK
 
 The non quadratic voting option is a new feature that has been added to MACI with the v1.2 release. It allows to conduct polls without the quadratic voting mechanism. This means that the number of voice credits is not reduced by the square of the weight of the vote casted. This option is useful for polls where the quadratic voting mechanism is not necessary, and it is also slightly cheaper for coordinators to tally votes, as there are less checks required in the Tally smart contract.
 
-To run a poll with non quadratic voting, the coordinator must set the `useQuadraticVoting` parameter to `false` when creating the MACI instance.
+To run a poll with non quadratic voting, the coordinator must set the `mode` parameter to `non-qv` when creating the MACI instance.
 
 ### Using Hardhat tasks
 
-In the deploy-config.json file set the `useQuadraticVoting` value to **false**.
+In the deploy-config.json file set the `mode` value to **non-qv**.
 
 ```json
 "Poll": {
     [...]
     "coordinatorPublicKey": "macipk",
-    "useQuadraticVoting": false
+    "mode": "non-qv"
+}
+```
+
+Then run the task to create a poll:
+
+```bash
+pnpm deploy-poll:NETWORK
+```
+
+## Full Credits Voting
+
+Full Credits Voting is a new feature introduced in MACI v3. This voting mode disables the quadratic voting mechanism and requires participants to allocate their entire voice credit balance to a single option. Unlike quadratic voting, where the cost of votes increases quadratically with the number of votes cast, Full Credits Voting uses a linear model: participants spend all their available voice credits on one chosen option. No splitting across multiple options is allowed. This option is useful for polls where the quadratic voting mechanism is not necessary and where it's important to ensure voters fully commit to a single choice—eliminating fragmented or spread-out voting behavior. It also offers a slight cost advantage for coordinators, as tallying is more efficient with fewer checks required in the Tally smart contract.
+
+To run a poll with full credits voting, the coordinator must set the `mode` parameter to `full` when creating the MACI instance.
+
+### Using Hardhat tasks
+
+In the deploy-config.json file set the `mode` value to **full**.
+
+```json
+"Poll": {
+    [...]
+    "coordinatorPublicKey": "macipk",
+    "mode": "full"
 }
 ```
 

package/versioned_docs/version-v3.x/core-concepts/spec.md

@@ -580,7 +580,7 @@ Please note that MACI requires the coordinator to generate proofs on an x86 mach
 
 ### 6.1. Message processing circuit
 
-The message processing circuit, defined in `circuits/circom/processMessages.circom`, allows the coordinator to prove that they have correctly applied each message in reverse order, in a consecutive batch of `5 ^ messageBatchDepth` messages to the respective state leaf within the state tree.
+The message processing circuit, defined in `circuits/circom/coordinator/qv/MessageProcessor.circom`, allows the coordinator to prove that they have correctly applied each message in reverse order, in a consecutive batch of `5 ^ messageBatchDepth` messages to the respective state leaf within the state tree.
 
 #### Parameters
 
@@ -747,15 +747,15 @@ The final tally should be:
 2. Total voice credits per vote option: `[3, 9, 19, 33, 26]`
 3. Total spent voice credits: `66`
 
-The coordinator uses the ballot tallying circuit (`tallyVotes.circom`) to generate proofs that they have correctly computed the tally. As there are many ballots to tally, each proof only computes the tally for a batch of ballots. Each proof is chained to the previous one such that each proof is also a proof of knowledge of the preimage of the previous tally commitment.
+The coordinator uses the ballot tallying circuit (`VoteTally.circom`) to generate proofs that they have correctly computed the tally. As there are many ballots to tally, each proof only computes the tally for a batch of ballots. Each proof is chained to the previous one such that each proof is also a proof of knowledge of the preimage of the previous tally commitment.
 
 #### Parameters
 
-| Parameter             | Description                                                                                                             |
-| --------------------- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |
-| `stateTreeDepth`      | Depth of the state tree, this value must be equal to `10`                                                               |
-| `intStateTreeDepth`   | Depth of the intermediate state tree, `5 ** intStateTreeDepth` is the batch size                                        |
-| `voteOptionTreeDepth` | Depth of the vote option tree, this must be the same value passed to the `deployPoll()` contract function of `MACI.sol` |
+| Parameter                       | Description                                                                                                             |
+| ------------------------------- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |
+| `stateTreeDepth`                | Depth of the state tree, this value must be equal to `10`                                                               |
+| `tallyProcessingStateTreeDepth` | Depth of the intermediate state tree, `5 ** tallyProcessingStateTreeDepth` is the batch size                            |
+| `voteOptionTreeDepth`           | Depth of the vote option tree, this must be the same value passed to the `deployPoll()` contract function of `MACI.sol` |
 
 #### Input signals
 
@@ -809,7 +809,7 @@ $\mathsf{poseidon_3}([tc_r, tc_t, tc_p])$
 
 1. That the coordinator knows the preimage of `sbCommitment` (see above)
 2. That `index` is less than or equal to `totalSignups`
-3. That each ballot in `ballots` is in a member of the ballot tree with the Merkle root `ballotRoot` at indices `batchStartIndex` to `batchStartIndex + (5 ** intStateTreeDepth)`
+3. That each ballot in `ballots` is in a member of the ballot tree with the Merkle root `ballotRoot` at indices `batchStartIndex` to `batchStartIndex + (5 ** tallyProcessingStateTreeDepth)`
 4. That each set of votes (`votes[i]`) has the Merkle root $blt_r$ whose value equals `ballots[i][1]`
 5. That the tally is valid, which is:
    - That the sum of votes per vote option is correct

package/versioned_docs/version-v3.x/core-concepts/workflow.md

@@ -133,7 +133,7 @@ The `MessageProcessor` contract will send the proof to a separate verifier contr
 
 #### Tally Results
 
-Finally, once all messages have been processed, the coordinator tallies the votes of the valid messages (off-chain). The coordinator creates a zk-SNARK proving that the valid messages in the state tree (proved in Process Messages step) contain votes that sum to the given tally result. Then, they call [`Tally.tallyVotes()`](/docs/technical-references/smart-contracts/solidity-docs/Tally#tallyvotes) with a hash of the correct tally results and the zk-SNARK proof. Similarly to the processMessages function, the `tallyVotes` function will send the proof to a verifier contract to ensure that it is valid.
+Finally, once all messages have been processed, the coordinator tallies the votes of the valid messages (off-chain). The coordinator creates a zk-SNARK proving that the valid messages in the state tree (proved in Process Messages step) contain votes that sum to the given tally result. Then, they call [`Tally.tallyVotes()`](/docs/technical-references/smart-contracts/solidity-docs/Tally#tallyvotes) with a hash of the correct tally results and the zk-SNARK proof. Similarly to the `processMessages` function, the `tallyVotes` function will send the proof to a verifier contract to ensure that it is valid.
 
 <!-- "hash of the correct tally results" - so are the final results actually put on chain? or just a hash?? -->
 

package/versioned_docs/version-v3.x/guides/compile-circuits.md

@@ -77,25 +77,25 @@ Remember that if on a ARM64 chip, you will not be able to compile the c++ witnes
 
 ### Configure circomkit
 
-Edit `circuits/circom/circuits` to include the circuits you would like to compile. This comes already configured with the two main coordinator circuits, in both qv and non qv variants, as well as the client side circuit. The parameters are designed to support testing use cases:
+Edit `circuits/circom/circuits` to include the circuits you would like to compile. This comes already configured with the main coordinator circuits, in qv, non qv and full credits variants, as well as the client side circuit. The parameters are designed to support testing use cases:
 
 ```json
 {
   "PollJoining_10_test": {
-    "file": "./anon/voter/PollJoining",
+    "file": "./voter/PollJoining",
     "template": "PollJoining",
     "params": [10],
     "pubs": ["nullifier", "stateRoot", "pollPublicKey", "pollId"]
   },
   "PollJoined_10_test": {
-    "file": "./anon/voter/PollJoined",
+    "file": "./voter/PollJoined",
     "template": "PollJoined",
     "params": [10],
     "pubs": ["stateRoot"]
   },
-  "ProcessMessages_10-20-2_test": {
-    "file": "./core/qv/processMessages",
-    "template": "ProcessMessages",
+  "MessageProcessorQv_10-20-2_test": {
+    "file": "./coordinator/qv/MessageProcessor",
+    "template": "MessageProcessorQv",
     "params": [10, 20, 2],
     "pubs": [
       "totalSignups",
@@ -109,9 +109,9 @@ Edit `circuits/circom/circuits` to include the circuits you would like to compil
       "voteOptions"
     ]
   },
-  "ProcessMessagesNonQv_10-20-2_test": {
-    "file": "./core/non-qv/processMessages",
-    "template": "ProcessMessagesNonQv",
+  "MessageProcessorNonQv_10-20-2_test": {
+    "file": "./coordinator/non-qv/MessageProcessor",
+    "template": "MessageProcessorNonQv",
     "params": [10, 20, 2],
     "pubs": [
       "totalSignups",
@@ -125,15 +125,31 @@ Edit `circuits/circom/circuits` to include the circuits you would like to compil
       "voteOptions"
     ]
   },
-  "TallyVotes_10-1-2_test": {
-    "file": "./core/qv/tallyVotes",
-    "template": "TallyVotes",
+  "ProcessMessagesFull_10-20-2_test": {
+    "file": "./coordinator/non-qv/MessageProcessor",
+    "template": "MessageProcessorFull",
+    "params": [10, 20, 2],
+    "pubs": [
+      "totalSignups",
+      "index",
+      "batchEndIndex",
+      "currentSbCommitment",
+      "newSbCommitment",
+      "outputBatchHash",
+      "actualStateTreeDepth",
+      "coordinatorPublicKeyHash",
+      "voteOptions"
+    ]
+  },
+  "VoteTallyQv_10-1-2_test": {
+    "file": "./coordinator/qv/VoteTally",
+    "template": "VoteTallyQv",
     "params": [10, 1, 2],
     "pubs": ["index", "totalSignups", "sbCommitment", "currentTallyCommitment", "newTallyCommitment"]
   },
-  "TallyVotesNonQv_10-1-2_test": {
-    "file": "./core/non-qv/tallyVotes",
-    "template": "TallyVotesNonQv",
+  "VoteTallyNonQv_10-1-2_test": {
+    "file": "./coordinator/non-qv/VoteTally",
+    "template": "VoteTallyNonQv",
     "params": [10, 1, 2],
     "pubs": ["index", "totalSignups", "sbCommitment", "currentTallyCommitment", "newTallyCommitment"]
   }

package/versioned_docs/version-v3.x/guides/integrating.md

@@ -43,7 +43,7 @@ function signUp(PublicKey memory _publicKey, bytes memory _signUpPolicyData) pub
 
 ## InitialVoiceCreditProxy
 
-If you'd like to extend the functionality of how votes are distributed among users, you need to extend [InitialVoiceCreditProxy](https://github.com/privacy-scaling-explorations/maci/blob/dev/contracts/contracts/initialVoiceCreditProxy/InitialVoiceCreditProxy.sol) contract. You can see our [basic example](https://github.com/privacy-scaling-explorations/maci/blob/dev/contracts/contracts/initialVoiceCreditProxy/ConstantInitialVoiceCreditProxy.sol) how it's implemented for constant distribution.
+If you'd like to extend the functionality of how votes are distributed among users, you'll need to build you own initial voice credit proxy contract by following the [IInitialVoiceCreditProxy interface](https://github.com/privacy-scaling-explorations/maci/blob/dev/packages/contracts/contracts/interfaces/IInitialVoiceCreditProxy.sol). You can see our [basic example](https://github.com/privacy-scaling-explorations/maci/blob/dev/packages/contracts/contracts/initialVoiceCreditProxy/ConstantInitialVoiceCreditProxy.sol) how it's implemented for constant distribution.
 
 ```ts
 contract ConstantInitialVoiceCreditProxy is InitialVoiceCreditProxy {

package/versioned_docs/version-v3.x/guides/testing/testing-in-detail.md

@@ -162,7 +162,7 @@ The core package contains a number of tests that are used to verify that the cor
 
 These tests interact with the crypto and dombinobjs packages, where mock data comes from. Their main goal is to ensure that the core functions work as expected, and that the state is as expected after a series of operations.
 
-Currently, there is a blend of e2e and unit tests, where e2e tests are used to verify that the entire MACI local processing works as expected (users signup, publish votes, messages are processed and finally these votes are tallied). Unit tests on the other hand are used to verify that the core functions work as expected, such as `processMessage` and `tallyVotes`. You will find them in separate files, with e2e being [here](https://github.com/privacy-scaling-explorations/maci/blob/dev/core/ts/__tests__/e2e.test.ts) and unit tests in the other files.
+Currently, there is a blend of e2e and unit tests, where e2e tests are used to verify that the entire MACI local processing works as expected (users signup, publish votes, messages are processed and finally these votes are tallied). Unit tests on the other hand are used to verify that the core functions work as expected, such as `MessageProcessor` and `VoteTally`. You will find them in separate files, with e2e being [here](https://github.com/privacy-scaling-explorations/maci/blob/dev/core/ts/__tests__/e2e.test.ts) and unit tests in the other files.
 
 ### Domainobjs/Crypto tests
 

package/versioned_docs/version-v3.x/guides/testing/testing-introduction.md

@@ -53,6 +53,32 @@ To run Contracts only tests, run:
 pnpm run test
 ```
 
+To run e2e tests for hardhat tasks for `contracts` using the in-memory hardhat network:
+
+```bash
+pnpm run test:hardhat
+```
+
+You can update the `deploy-config.json` file to change policies or other deployment settings used by the test.
+
+You can enhance test reporting and gas cost estimation by adding the following variables to your `.env` file:
+
+```bash
+# CoinMarkerCap api key for prices (gas reporter)
+COINMARKETCAP_API_KEY=
+# Gas price for gas reporter
+# Allows you to manually specify the gas price (e.g. 3 gwei)
+GAS_REPORTER_PRICE=
+```
+
+These variables are used by `hardhat-gas-reporter` to show cost estimates for gas usage in the test reports.
+
+If you would like to run these E2E tests against a different [supported networks](/docs/supported-networks/), you can override the network like this:
+
+```bash
+pnpm exec hardhat test --network {NETWORK} ./tests/e2e/hardhatTasks.test.ts
+```
+
 ### Circuits
 
 To test the circuits, from the main `maci/` directory, run:
@@ -71,10 +97,10 @@ or download them. Please remember to not use these testing `.zkey` files in prod
 
 ### Download `.zkey` files or the witness generation binaries
 
-MACI has two main zk-SNARK circuits, `processMessages` and `tallyVotes`.
+MACI has two main zk-SNARK circuits, `MessageProcessor` and `VoteTally`.
 
 :::info
-The `processMessages` and `tallyVotes` circuits are also provided in a non-quadratic voting (non-QV) version. Currently these new versions have not undergone a trusted setup ceremony.
+The `MessageProcessor` and `VoteTally` circuits are also provided in a non-quadratic voting (non-QV) and in a full credits voting (full) versions. Currently these new versions have not undergone a trusted setup ceremony.
 :::
 
 Each circuit is parameterised and there should be one
@@ -151,6 +177,12 @@ To run e2e tests with normal voting (not quadratic voting):
 pnpm run test:e2e-non-qv
 ```
 
+To run e2e tests with full credits voting (full):
+
+```bash
+pnpm run test:e2e-full
+```
+
 To run integration tests:
 
 ```bash

package/versioned_docs/version-v3.x/guides/troubleshooting.md

@@ -11,17 +11,17 @@ sidebar_position: 5
 
 ### Case: missing `.dat` files
 
-If your logs look like the following, then make sure you have `ProcessMessages_10-2-1-2_test.dat` and `TallyVotes_10-1-2_test.dat` files in the same directory as your zkeys:
+If your logs look like the following, then make sure you have `MessageProcessorQv_10-2-1-2_test.dat` and `VoteTallyQv_10-1-2_test.dat` files in the same directory as your zkeys:
 
 ```
 node build/ts/index.js generateProofs -x 0xf204a4Ef082f5c04bB89F7D5E6568B796096735a \
 >     -sk macisk.49953af3585856f539d194b46c82f4ed54ec508fb9b882940cbe68bbc57e59e \
 >     -o 0 \
 >     -r ~/rapidsnark/build/prover \
->     -wp ./zkeys/ProcessMessages_10-2-1-2_test \
->     -wt ./zkeys/TallyVotes_10-1-2_test \
->     -zp ./zkeys/ProcessMessages_10-2-1-2_test.0.zkey \
->     -zt ./zkeys/TallyVotes_10-1-2_test.0.zkey \
+>     -wp ./zkeys/MessageProcessorQv_10-2-1-2_test \
+>     -wt ./zkeys/VoteTallyQv_10-1-2_test \
+>     -zp ./zkeys/MessageProcessorQv_10-2-1-2_test.0.zkey \
+>     -zt ./zkeys/VoteTallyQv_10-1-2_test.0.zkey \
 >     -t tally.json \
 >     -f proofs
 
@@ -36,7 +36,7 @@ terminate called after throwing an instance of 'std::system_error'
 Aborted (core dumped)
 
 Error: could not generate proof.
-Error: Error executing ./zkeys/ProcessMessages_10-2-1-2_test /tmp/tmp-9904-zG0k8YPTATWB/input.json /tmp/tmp-9904-zG0k8YPTATWB/output.wtns
+Error: Error executing ./zkeys/MessageProcessorQv_10-2-1-2_test /tmp/tmp-9904-zG0k8YPTATWB/input.json /tmp/tmp-9904-zG0k8YPTATWB/output.wtns
     at genProof (/home/ubuntu/maci/circuits/ts/index.ts:44:15)
     at /home/ubuntu/maci/cli/ts/generateProofs.ts:339:25
     at step (/home/ubuntu/maci/cli/build/generateProofs.js:33:23)
@@ -159,3 +159,48 @@ Error: The verifier contract found the proof invalid.
 ### The on-chain verification of total spent voice credits failed
 
 If you ran the `verify` command and got this error, please ensure consistency in your use of quadratic voting throughout interactions with MACI, including poll deployment, proof generation, and verification.
+
+### Proof generation process is killed
+
+If your terminal output ends like this:
+
+```
+[i] Starting to fetch logs from block 8386826
+[i] Generating proofs of message processing...
+[i] Progress: 1 / 1
+[i] Wait until proof generation is finished
+Killed
+ELIFECYCLE  Command failed with exit code 137.
+```
+
+This typically indicates the proof generation process was terminated due to exceeding the system's available memory limit (exit code `137` = SIGKILL by the OS, often due to OOM).
+
+Increase Node.js' memory allocation by setting the `NODE_OPTIONS` environment variable before running the command:
+
+```bash
+export NODE_OPTIONS="--max-old-space-size=4096"
+# You can increase the value further (e.g., 8192 for 8GB) if your system has enough RAM:
+export NODE_OPTIONS="--max-old-space-size=8192"
+```
+
+### Error: Not enough or too many values for input signals
+
+If you see errors like:
+
+```
+Error: Not enough values for input signal currentVoteWeightsPathElements
+at /home/maci/node_modules/.pnpm/circom_runtime@0.1.28/node_modules/circom_runtime/build/main.cjs:513:27
+...
+```
+
+```
+Error: Too many values for input signal ballots
+at /home/maci/node_modules/.pnpm/circom_runtime@0.1.28/node_modules/circom_runtime/build/main.cjs:513:27
+...
+```
+
+This usually happens when the Merkle tree depth configured in your MACI deployment does not match the depth expected by the zkey files used during proof generation.
+To solve this:
+
+- Download the correct zkey files from a trusted source.
+- Verify that the `stateTreeDepth`, `messageTreeDepth`, and `voteOptionTreeDepth` used in your CLI or config match the values used to generate those zkey files.

package/versioned_docs/version-v3.x/quick-start.md

@@ -73,7 +73,7 @@ Currently, the ceremony artifacts work with MACI version up to 2.x
 In order to run MACI polls, a coordinator is required to publish their MACI public key. You will need to generate a MACI keypair, and treat the private key just as your ethereum private keys. Please store them in a safe place as you won't be able to finish a round if you lose access, or if compromised a bad actor could decrypt the vote and publish them online. You can generate a new key pair using maci-cli by running the following command in the root of the project:
 
 ```bash
-pnpm run generateMaciKeyPair
+pnpm run generate-maci-keypair
 ```
 
 ### Set the .env
@@ -135,16 +135,16 @@ For testing we suggest using the **FreeForAlPolicy** as it allows anyone to sign
 
 The VerifyingKeysRegistry hold the verifying keys used to verify the proofs, on the zkeys field we define the path to the zero knowledge artifacts we downloaded in the previous steps.
 
-| Property                | Description                                                                          |
-| ----------------------- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ |
-| **stateTreeDepth**      | Defines how many users the system supports.                                          |
-| **intStateTreeDepth**   | Defines how many ballots can be processed per batch when tallying the results.       |
-| **messageTreeDepth**    | Defines how many messages (votes) the system supports.                               |
-| **voteOptionTreeDepth** | Defines how many vote options the system supports.                                   |
-| **messageBatchDepth**   | Defines how many messages in a batch can the circuit process.                        |
-| **zkeys**               | Defines the path to the zkey files for QV and Non QV keys.                           |
-| **pollJoiningZkey**     | Defines the zkey to the poll joining circuit which allows to join polls for voting.  |
-| **pollJoinedZkey**      | Defines the zkey to the poll joined circuit which allows to prove you joined a poll. |
+| Property                          | Description                                                                          |
+| --------------------------------- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ |
+| **stateTreeDepth**                | Defines how many users the system supports.                                          |
+| **tallyProcessingStateTreeDepth** | Defines how many ballots can be processed per batch when tallying the results.       |
+| **messageTreeDepth**              | Defines how many messages (votes) the system supports.                               |
+| **voteOptionTreeDepth**           | Defines how many vote options the system supports.                                   |
+| **messageBatchDepth**             | Defines how many messages in a batch can the circuit process.                        |
+| **zkeys**                         | Defines the path to the zkey files for QV, Non QV and Full Credits keys.             |
+| **pollJoiningZkey**               | Defines the zkey to the poll joining circuit which allows to join polls for voting.  |
+| **pollJoinedZkey**                | Defines the zkey to the poll joined circuit which allows to prove you joined a poll. |
 
 :::important
 The recommended values for test keys are: **10-1-2-2-1**. For ceremony keys: **14-5-9-3-2**.
@@ -203,6 +203,10 @@ As a coordinator, first you need to merge signups and messages (votes). This opt
 pnpm merge:[network] --poll [poll-id]
 ```
 
+:::info
+`poll-id` starts at 0 and increments for each deployed poll
+:::
+
 Then you need to generate the proofs for the message processing, and tally calculations. This allows to publish the poll results on-chain and then everyone can verify the results:
 
 ```bash
@@ -210,12 +214,16 @@ pnpm run prove:[network] --poll [poll-id] \
     --coordinator-private-key [coordinator-maci-private-key] \
     --tally-file ../results/tally.json \
     --output-dir ../results/proofs/ \
-    --start-block [block-number]
+    --start-block [block-number] \
     --blocks-per-batch [number-of-blocks]
 ```
 
-:::important
-You can reduce the time of the proving by including more blocks per batch, you can try with 500.
+:::info
+The `--coordinator-private-key` is the one you generated earlier with `pnpm run generate-maci-keypair`.
+
+`--start-block` is the block number from which to start looking for events from. You can use the block that you deployed the contracts in.
+
+You can reduce the time of the proving by including more blocks per batch with `--blocks-per-batch`, you can try with 500.
 :::
 
 #### Submit On-chain
@@ -224,8 +232,8 @@ Now it's time to submit the poll results on-chain so that everyone can verify th
 
 ```bash
 pnpm submitOnChain:[network] --poll [poll-id] \
-    --output-dir proofs/ \
-    --tally-file proofs/tally.json
+    --output-dir ../results/proofs/ \
+    --tally-file ../results/tally.json
 ```
 
 ### Tally

package/versioned_docs/version-v3.x/resources.md

@@ -28,6 +28,7 @@ sidebar_position: 13
 - [MACI - Starting From Scratch](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qVuhWlHnQF0) - Doris Chan 03/2024
 - [MACI Workshop](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AimgqnMjG0o) - ctrlc03 04/2024
 - [MACI Starter Kit Demo](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pYoBLLtVEoI&t=1s) - Yash 05/2024
+- [The Promise of Blockchain Voting](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TQxR7U52ne0) - Sam Richards 06/2024
 - [MACI Tutorial Deploying Contracts and Subgraph](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-QA0VB9EUMk) - Crisgarner 09/2024
 - [MACI Tutorial Frontend Deployment 🚀](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=q0yS8RfwDcw) - Crisgarner 09/2024
 - [Finalizing a MACI Round](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nlS3hOC0ljw) - Crisgarner 09/2024

package/versioned_docs/version-v3.x/security/audit.md

@@ -38,7 +38,7 @@ We would like to thank the Veridise team for their effort in keeping open source
 
 **Description**
 
-In the template `QuinSelector`, if you want to confirm the input signal index is a valid integer less than 2\*\*3, you should add Num2bits(3) to check it.
+In the template `QuinarySelector`, if you want to confirm the input signal index is a valid integer less than 2\*\*3, you should add Num2bits(3) to check it.
 
 **Code Location**
 
@@ -119,7 +119,7 @@ greaterThan[i].in[1] <== index;
 
 **Description**
 
-In the template `QuinGeneratePathIndices`, the constraints of the `signal n[levels + 1]` don't perform well for division and modulo counting.
+In the template `QuinaryGeneratePathIndices`, the constraints of the `signal n[levels + 1]` don't perform well for division and modulo counting.
 
 **Code Location**