@m13v/s4l 1.7.4-rc.11 → 1.7.4-rc.13

package/mcp/dist/version.json

@@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
 {
-  "version": "1.7.4-rc.11",
-  "installedAt": "2026-07-11T02:01:02.682Z"
+  "version": "1.7.4-rc.13",
+  "installedAt": "2026-07-11T02:59:38.374Z"
 }

package/mcp/manifest.json

@@ -2,7 +2,7 @@
   "dxt_version": "0.1",
   "name": "social-autoposter",
   "display_name": "S4L",
-  "version": "1.7.4-rc.11",
+  "version": "1.7.4-rc.13",
   "description": "Draft, review, approve, and autopilot X/Twitter posts.",
   "long_description": "## **⚠️ The disclaimer above is generic Claude boilerplate.** Anthropic shows the same warning on every plugin regardless of what it does; any plugin has the same level of access as any app you download from the internet.\n\nS4L is an open source product developed by Mediar.ai Incorporated, a VC-backed San Francisco-based startup.\n\nTo get started:\n\n1\\. Copy this prompt: **Set me up on S4L plugin end to end**\n\n2\\. Quit with CMD+Q, reopen Claude, paste into a new chat.\n\nWhat happens next:\n\n* About every 5 minutes S4L scans X for posts that match your topics and drafts replies in your voice.\n* Drafts show up as review cards, usually the first within a few minutes. Nothing is posted automatically; you approve each one.\n* Posting autopilot stays off until you explicitly turn it on.",
   "author": {

package/mcp/menubar/s4l_card.py

@@ -431,7 +431,21 @@ def _details_lines(d):
     d = d or {}
     lines = []
     style = (d.get("engagement_style") or "").strip()
-    if style:
+    # Two-draft cards (2026-07-11): name each slot's style so the reviewer
+    # can tell WHICH style produced the draft they are picking (Draft B is
+    # the exploration slot; its source arm renders separately below via the
+    # generic experiments lines). Single-draft cards keep the old one-liner.
+    _dual = d.get("drafts")
+    if isinstance(_dual, list) and len(_dual) == 2:
+        _slot_labels = {"a": "Draft A", "b": "Draft B"}
+        for _draft in _dual:
+            _s = (_draft.get("style") or "").strip()
+            if _s:
+                _label = _slot_labels.get(
+                    (_draft.get("variant") or "").strip().lower(), "Draft"
+                )
+                lines.append(f"{_label} style: {_s}")
+    elif style:
         lines.append(f"Style: {style}")
     desc = (d.get("style_description") or "").strip()
     if desc:

package/mcp/package.json

@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
 {
   "name": "@m13v/s4l-mcp",
-  "version": "1.7.4-rc.11",
+  "version": "1.7.4-rc.13",
   "private": true,
   "description": "Desktop MCP client for social-autoposter (X/Twitter rail): manual draft/review/approve loop, autopilot control, and stats. Thin wrapper over the existing pipeline scripts.",
   "license": "MIT",

package/package.json

@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
 {
   "name": "@m13v/s4l",
-  "version": "1.7.4-rc.11",
+  "version": "1.7.4-rc.13",
   "description": "Automated social posting pipeline for Reddit, X/Twitter, LinkedIn, and Moltbook. Install as a Claude Code agent skill.",
   "bin": {
     "social-autoposter": "bin/cli.js",

package/scripts/engagement_styles.py

@@ -1482,13 +1482,35 @@ def get_assigned_style_prompt(platform, assignment, context="posting"):
         # LENGTH A/B CONCLUDED 2026-06-04: control won, so the prompt always
         # uses the legacy generic length guidance. The treatment's per-style
         # target prompt remains preserved only in the shipped experiment card.
-        lines.append("")
-        lines.append(
-            "**LENGTH: keep it tight.** One or two sentences, well under the "
-            "250-character Twitter limit. A short, sharp reply almost always "
-            "beats a paragraph. This applies to the comment text only; any "
-            "link/CTA the system appends afterward is separate."
-        )
+        #
+        # EXCEPTION (2026-07-11, Draft-B explore slot): exploration
+        # assignments (pick_exploration_style, marked by `source`) honor the
+        # style's own target_chars so the A/B pair diverges on the length
+        # axis too. The uniform clamp flattened every draft to the same
+        # 2-sentence shape (user: "the older drafts looked all very similar
+        # in terms of the length"). The 06-04 conclusion still governs the
+        # scored path, which never carries `source`.
+        _explore_tc = assignment.get("target_chars")
+        if (assignment.get("source") in ("human_derived", "model_invented")
+                and _explore_tc):
+            lines.append("")
+            lines.append(
+                f"**LENGTH: aim for about {int(_explore_tc)} characters** "
+                "(this style's own winning length; within about 30% either "
+                "way is fine, never above 250). Let the target set the form: "
+                "a very short target means one clipped line, a long one can "
+                "breathe. Do NOT default to the usual two-sentence shape. "
+                "This applies to the comment text only; any link/CTA the "
+                "system appends afterward is separate."
+            )
+        else:
+            lines.append("")
+            lines.append(
+                "**LENGTH: keep it tight.** One or two sentences, well under the "
+                "250-character Twitter limit. A short, sharp reply almost always "
+                "beats a paragraph. This applies to the comment text only; any "
+                "link/CTA the system appends afterward is separate."
+            )
         lines.append("")
         lines.append(
             'In your output JSON, set "engagement_style" to exactly '

package/scripts/feedback_digest.py

@@ -393,15 +393,21 @@ def _is_actionable(e: dict) -> bool:
     # as actionable as a reject (and it feeds edit_examples).
     if e.get("edited"):
         return True
-    # An explicit pairwise draft choice (switched to B, or tried B and came
-    # back to A) is style evidence on par with an edit; without this trigger a
-    # reviewer who mostly approves would bank pairwise signals behind the
-    # plain-approvals gate forever. Hover-only informed keeps stay
-    # NON-actionable on purpose: they are corroborating-weight evidence (like
-    # no_reason_given) and ride along with the next real trigger instead of
-    # burning a Claude turn on their own.
+    # Any pairwise draft signal triggers the digest (2026-07-10 user rule,
+    # widened same evening): an explicit choice (switched to B, or tried B
+    # and came back to A) is style evidence on par with an edit, and even a
+    # hover-read of the other draft (>= DRAFT_READ_MS) is a small but real
+    # signal that must flow through the pipeline rather than bank forever
+    # behind the plain-approvals gate. The PROMPT still weights the tiers
+    # (explicit strong, hover-read weak/corroborating); this gate only
+    # decides when a Claude turn is worth burning. A zero-interaction
+    # approve (second_draft_not_read) remains non-actionable: no signal.
     dc = _draft_choice(e)
-    if dc and (not dc.get("auto_selected") or dc.get("visited_other")):
+    if dc and (
+        not dc.get("auto_selected")
+        or dc.get("visited_other")
+        or (dc.get("hover_b_ms") or 0) >= DRAFT_READ_MS
+    ):
         return True
     return bool((e.get("reject_note") or "").strip())