@lucern/mcp 0.3.0-alpha.7 → 0.3.0-alpha.9

package/dist/runtime.js

@@ -4924,17 +4924,44 @@ z.object({
     message: "SL invariant b+d+u=1 violated at API boundary"
   }
 );
-var EpistemicNodeTypeSchema = z.enum([
+
+// ../contracts/src/schema-helpers/spine/tables/epistemicNodes.ts
+var NODE_TYPES = [
+  "decision",
   "belief",
-  "evidence",
   "question",
-  "answer",
+  "theme",
+  "deal",
   "topic",
+  "claim",
+  "evidence",
+  "synthesis",
+  "answer",
+  "atomic_fact",
+  "excerpt",
+  "source",
+  "company",
+  "person",
+  "investor",
+  "function",
+  "value_chain"
+];
+new Set(NODE_TYPES);
+
+// ../contracts/src/types/graph-ref.ts
+var GRAPH_REF_EXTRA_NODE_TYPES = [
   "edge",
   "ontology",
   "lens",
   "contradiction"
-]);
+];
+var GRAPH_REF_NODE_TYPES = [
+  ...NODE_TYPES,
+  ...GRAPH_REF_EXTRA_NODE_TYPES
+];
+var EpistemicNodeTypeSchema = z.enum(
+  GRAPH_REF_NODE_TYPES
+);
 var GraphRefSchema = z.discriminatedUnion("kind", [
   z.object({
     kind: z.literal("epistemic_node"),
@@ -4982,33 +5009,14 @@ function assertEdgePolicyAllowed(manifest, edgeType, from, to) {
 }
 
 // ../contracts/src/manifests/edge-policy-manifest.data.ts
+var publicEpistemicNodeEdgePolicy = (edgeType) => ({
+  edgeType,
+  fromKinds: ["epistemic_node"],
+  toKinds: ["epistemic_node"],
+  description: "Canonical public create_edge policy for graph-node relationships. The policy layer gates edge-type membership, not endpoint semantics."
+});
 var edgePolicyManifest = {
-  policies: [
-    {
-      edgeType: "evidence_derived_from_evidence",
-      fromKinds: ["epistemic_node"],
-      fromNodeTypes: ["evidence"],
-      toKinds: ["epistemic_node"],
-      toNodeTypes: ["evidence"],
-      description: "Evidence E2 was synthesized from evidence E1 by a transformation. Provides chain-of-evidence lineage."
-    },
-    {
-      edgeType: "evidence_supports_belief",
-      fromKinds: ["epistemic_node"],
-      fromNodeTypes: ["evidence"],
-      toKinds: ["epistemic_node"],
-      toNodeTypes: ["belief"],
-      description: "Existing link_evidence_to_belief semantics promoted to the create_edge policy source."
-    },
-    {
-      edgeType: "evidence_supports_question",
-      fromKinds: ["epistemic_node"],
-      fromNodeTypes: ["evidence"],
-      toKinds: ["epistemic_node"],
-      toNodeTypes: ["question"],
-      description: "Existing link_evidence_to_question semantics promoted to the create_edge policy source."
-    }
-  ]
+  policies: EDGE_TYPE_VALUES.map(publicEpistemicNodeEdgePolicy)
 };
 
 // ../contracts/src/tenant-client.contract.ts
@@ -7633,15 +7641,15 @@ var IDENTITY_WHOAMI = {
 };
 var COMPILE_CONTEXT = {
   name: "compile_context",
-  description: "Compile a focused reasoning context for a topic. Like `git log --graph --decorate` for the reasoning substrate \u2014 returns the canonical Pillar 3 context pack through the public API shape.",
+  description: "Compile a focused reasoning context. If topicId is omitted, Lucern resolves the best topic from the query. Like `git log --graph --decorate` for the reasoning substrate \u2014 returns the canonical Pillar 3 context pack through the public API shape.",
   parameters: {
     topicId: {
       type: "string",
-      description: "Topic scope ID to compile"
+      description: "Optional topic scope ID. Omit to resolve the topic from query."
     },
     query: {
       type: "string",
-      description: "Optional focus query used to rank context items"
+      description: "Focus query used to resolve the topic and rank context items. Required when topicId is omitted."
     },
     budget: {
       type: "number",
@@ -7665,7 +7673,7 @@ var COMPILE_CONTEXT = {
       description: "Include related ontological entities in the compiled result"
     }
   },
-  required: ["topicId"],
+  required: [],
   response: {
     description: "Compiled context pack for the requested topic",
     fields: {
@@ -10164,7 +10172,7 @@ var contextContracts = [
     path: "/context/compile",
     sdkNamespace: "context",
     sdkMethod: "compileContext",
-    summary: "Compile a focused reasoning context for a topic.",
+    summary: "Compile a focused reasoning context, resolving topic from query when omitted.",
     convex: {
       module: "contextCompiler",
       functionName: "compile",
@@ -10630,12 +10638,12 @@ var linkEvidenceToBeliefEdgeInput = (input, context) => withCreatedBy(
   compactRecord4({
     fromNodeId: input.insightId ?? input.evidenceNodeId ?? input.evidenceId,
     toNodeId: input.beliefNodeId ?? input.beliefId ?? input.targetId,
-    edgeType: "evidence_supports_belief",
+    edgeType: "informs",
     globalId: input.globalId ?? `edge:${String(
       input.insightId ?? input.evidenceNodeId ?? input.evidenceId
     )}:${String(
       input.beliefNodeId ?? input.beliefId ?? input.targetId
-    )}:evidence_supports_belief`,
+    )}:informs`,
     weight: typeof input.weight === "number" ? input.weight : input.type === "contradicting" ? -1 : 1,
     context: input.rationale ?? input.context,
     skipLayerValidation: true,
@@ -10648,12 +10656,12 @@ var linkEvidenceToQuestionEdgeInput = (input, context) => withCreatedBy(
   compactRecord4({
     fromNodeId: input.insightId ?? input.evidenceNodeId ?? input.evidenceId,
     toNodeId: input.questionId ?? input.questionNodeId ?? input.targetId,
-    edgeType: "evidence_supports_question",
+    edgeType: "responds_to",
     globalId: input.globalId ?? `edge:${String(
       input.insightId ?? input.evidenceNodeId ?? input.evidenceId
     )}:${String(
       input.questionId ?? input.questionNodeId ?? input.targetId
-    )}:evidence_supports_question`,
+    )}:responds_to`,
     weight: input.impactScore ?? input.weight,
     context: input.rationale ?? input.context,
     skipLayerValidation: true,
@@ -12158,10 +12166,13 @@ var tasksContracts = [
     }
   })
 ];
+var CREATE_EDGE_TYPES = edgePolicyManifest.policies.map(
+  (policy) => policy.edgeType
+);
 var createEdgeArgs = z.object({
   from: GraphRefSchema,
   to: GraphRefSchema,
-  edgeType: z.string(),
+  edgeType: z.enum(CREATE_EDGE_TYPES),
   globalId: z.string().optional(),
   weight: z.number().optional(),
   confidence: z.number().optional(),
@@ -17032,10 +17043,20 @@ function toPublicCompiledContext(pack) {
 var scopeContextHandlers = {
   async compile_context(args, ctx) {
     const requestedScope = readTopicIdArg(args);
-    if (!requestedScope) {
-      throw new Error("[compile_context] topicId is required.");
-    }
-    const topicId = await resolveTopicScopeId(requestedScope, "compile_context");
+    const query = readString(args.query);
+    if (!requestedScope && !query) {
+      throw new Error("[compile_context] query is required when topicId is omitted.");
+    }
+    const topicId = requestedScope ? await resolveTopicScopeId(requestedScope, "compile_context") : (await resolveTopicForWrite(ctx, {
+      workspaceId: readString(args.workspaceId),
+      topicHint: readString(args.topicHint),
+      summary: query ?? "",
+      tags: readStringArray(args.tags),
+      touchedPaths: readStringArray(args.touchedPaths),
+      sourceRef: readString(args.sourceRef),
+      sourceKind: readString(args.sourceKind) ?? "compile_context",
+      autoCreate: false
+    })).topicId;
     if (ctx.sessionType === "user" && Array.isArray(ctx.allowedTopics) && (!ctx.allowedTopics.includes(topicId) || ctx.allowedTopics.length === 0)) {
       throw new Error(
         `[compile_context] Access denied to compile context for topic ${topicId}.`