@lucern/mcp 0.3.0-alpha.4 → 0.3.0-alpha.6

package/dist/gateway.js

@@ -11,6 +11,487 @@ function requireActorPrincipalId(authContext) {
   }
   throw new Error("Access denied: federated principal context required.");
 }
+
+// ../contracts/src/graph-intelligence.contract.ts
+var GRAPH_INTELLIGENCE_MODE_TOOL_NAMES = {
+  core: [
+    "get_graph_structure_analysis",
+    "get_topic_coverage",
+    "get_graph_gaps",
+    "list_beliefs",
+    "list_questions",
+    "search_evidence"
+  ],
+  bias: [
+    "get_graph_structure_analysis",
+    "detect_confirmation_bias",
+    "find_contradictions",
+    "search_evidence",
+    "list_beliefs"
+  ],
+  stress: [
+    "get_graph_structure_analysis",
+    "get_graph_gaps",
+    "find_contradictions",
+    "get_falsification_questions",
+    "list_beliefs",
+    "list_questions"
+  ],
+  operational: [
+    "get_topic_coverage",
+    "get_graph_gaps",
+    "list_beliefs",
+    "list_questions",
+    "search_evidence"
+  ],
+  alpha: [
+    "get_graph_structure_analysis",
+    "detect_confirmation_bias",
+    "find_contradictions",
+    "search_beliefs",
+    "search_evidence"
+  ],
+  semantic: [
+    "get_graph_structure_analysis",
+    "search_beliefs",
+    "search_evidence",
+    "traverse_graph",
+    "query_lineage",
+    "get_graph_neighborhood"
+  ],
+  evidence: [
+    "get_graph_structure_analysis",
+    "get_topic_coverage",
+    "search_evidence",
+    "get_falsification_questions",
+    "find_contradictions"
+  ]
+};
+var byMode = (mode) => GRAPH_INTELLIGENCE_MODE_TOOL_NAMES[mode];
+var GRAPH_INTELLIGENCE_QUERIES = [
+  {
+    id: "confirmation-bias",
+    categoryId: "problems",
+    mode: "bias",
+    name: "Find Confirmation Bias",
+    description: "Find beliefs supported mainly by confirming evidence.",
+    prompt: "Find beliefs where supporting evidence overwhelms challenging evidence. Prioritize high-conviction beliefs with few defeaters.",
+    highlightStrategy: "bias-risk",
+    riskLevel: "high"
+  },
+  {
+    id: "contradiction-map",
+    categoryId: "problems",
+    mode: "stress",
+    name: "Map Contradictions",
+    description: "Surface direct and indirect contradiction clusters.",
+    prompt: "Map the graph's contradiction clusters and explain which tensions matter most.",
+    highlightStrategy: "contradictions",
+    riskLevel: "high"
+  },
+  {
+    id: "weak-evidence",
+    categoryId: "problems",
+    mode: "stress",
+    name: "Weak Evidence Chains",
+    description: "Find important claims with thin or indirect evidence.",
+    prompt: "Find high-importance beliefs whose evidence support is thin, indirect, stale, or low quality.",
+    highlightStrategy: "weak-support",
+    riskLevel: "medium"
+  },
+  {
+    id: "single-source",
+    categoryId: "problems",
+    mode: "bias",
+    name: "Single-Source Risk",
+    description: "Find claims overly dependent on one source or source type.",
+    prompt: "Identify beliefs that rely on a single source, one methodology, or one repeated perspective.",
+    highlightStrategy: "source-concentration",
+    riskLevel: "medium"
+  },
+  {
+    id: "untested-assumptions",
+    categoryId: "problems",
+    mode: "stress",
+    name: "Untested Assumptions",
+    description: "Find load-bearing assumptions without falsification paths.",
+    prompt: "Find assumptions that appear load-bearing but do not have direct testing questions or falsification evidence.",
+    highlightStrategy: "untested",
+    riskLevel: "high"
+  },
+  {
+    id: "load-bearing-beliefs",
+    categoryId: "problems",
+    mode: "stress",
+    name: "Load-Bearing Beliefs",
+    description: "Find central beliefs whose failure would affect many claims.",
+    prompt: "Find the beliefs with the largest downstream impact if they are wrong.",
+    highlightStrategy: "load-bearing",
+    riskLevel: "high"
+  },
+  {
+    id: "cascade-analysis",
+    categoryId: "problems",
+    mode: "stress",
+    name: "Cascade Analysis",
+    description: "Trace what changes if a belief is weakened or invalidated.",
+    prompt: "Analyze likely downstream cascades if the most central or uncertain beliefs are weakened.",
+    highlightStrategy: "cascade",
+    riskLevel: "high"
+  },
+  {
+    id: "unanswered-questions",
+    categoryId: "gaps",
+    mode: "operational",
+    name: "Unanswered Questions",
+    description: "Find important open questions that block confidence.",
+    prompt: "Identify the most important unanswered questions and explain which beliefs they block.",
+    highlightStrategy: "open-questions"
+  },
+  {
+    id: "thin-themes",
+    categoryId: "gaps",
+    mode: "operational",
+    name: "Thin Themes",
+    description: "Find topics with shallow belief or evidence coverage.",
+    prompt: "Find themes that look underdeveloped relative to their role in the graph.",
+    highlightStrategy: "thin-themes"
+  },
+  {
+    id: "missing-evidence",
+    categoryId: "gaps",
+    mode: "stress",
+    name: "Missing Evidence",
+    description: "Find beliefs that need specific missing evidence.",
+    prompt: "Find the most valuable missing evidence needed to strengthen or falsify the graph.",
+    highlightStrategy: "missing-evidence"
+  },
+  {
+    id: "isolated-clusters",
+    categoryId: "gaps",
+    mode: "operational",
+    name: "Isolated Clusters",
+    description: "Find clusters not connected to the broader graph.",
+    prompt: "Find isolated graph clusters and recommend bridge questions or bridge evidence.",
+    highlightStrategy: "isolated-clusters"
+  },
+  {
+    id: "source-contribution",
+    categoryId: "gaps",
+    mode: "evidence",
+    name: "Source Contribution",
+    description: "Assess how source mix shapes the graph.",
+    prompt: "Assess whether the source mix is balanced enough for the graph's strongest claims.",
+    highlightStrategy: "source-mix"
+  },
+  {
+    id: "stale-beliefs",
+    categoryId: "gaps",
+    mode: "operational",
+    name: "Stale Beliefs",
+    description: "Find beliefs that need review because they are old or stale.",
+    prompt: "Find beliefs that should be revisited because they are stale, unsupported by recent evidence, or contradicted by newer context.",
+    highlightStrategy: "staleness"
+  },
+  {
+    id: "assumption-pyramid",
+    categoryId: "reasoning",
+    mode: "operational",
+    name: "Assumption Pyramid",
+    description: "Show which conclusions rest on which assumptions.",
+    prompt: "Build an assumption pyramid from the graph: foundational assumptions, intermediate claims, and top-level conclusions.",
+    highlightStrategy: "assumptions"
+  },
+  {
+    id: "converging-evidence",
+    categoryId: "reasoning",
+    mode: "evidence",
+    name: "Converging Evidence",
+    description: "Find claims supported by independent evidence streams.",
+    prompt: "Find beliefs with genuinely independent converging evidence and explain why they are robust.",
+    highlightStrategy: "convergence"
+  },
+  {
+    id: "weakest-links",
+    categoryId: "reasoning",
+    mode: "stress",
+    name: "Weakest Links",
+    description: "Find the weakest links in important reasoning chains.",
+    prompt: "Find the weakest links in important reasoning chains and explain how to test them.",
+    highlightStrategy: "weak-links",
+    riskLevel: "medium"
+  },
+  {
+    id: "challenged-beliefs",
+    categoryId: "reasoning",
+    mode: "stress",
+    name: "Challenged Beliefs",
+    description: "Find beliefs with active challenges or defeaters.",
+    prompt: "Find beliefs with active challenges, contradiction edges, or unresolved defeaters.",
+    highlightStrategy: "challenged"
+  },
+  {
+    id: "contrarian-map",
+    categoryId: "strategic",
+    mode: "alpha",
+    name: "Contrarian Map",
+    description: "Find non-consensus beliefs and where they are grounded.",
+    prompt: "Find the graph's strongest contrarian or non-consensus beliefs and explain their support.",
+    highlightStrategy: "contrarian"
+  },
+  {
+    id: "irreversibility-audit",
+    categoryId: "strategic",
+    mode: "stress",
+    name: "Irreversibility Audit",
+    description: "Find irreversible bets and assumptions behind them.",
+    prompt: "Audit irreversible decisions or beliefs and identify what must be true before acting.",
+    highlightStrategy: "irreversible",
+    riskLevel: "high"
+  },
+  {
+    id: "pre-mortem",
+    categoryId: "strategic",
+    mode: "stress",
+    name: "Pre-Mortem",
+    description: "Explain how the graph could be wrong.",
+    prompt: "Run a pre-mortem: assume the current thesis fails and identify the most plausible failure paths.",
+    highlightStrategy: "failure-paths",
+    riskLevel: "high"
+  },
+  {
+    id: "devils-advocate",
+    categoryId: "strategic",
+    mode: "stress",
+    name: "Devil's Advocate",
+    description: "Generate the strongest critique of the graph.",
+    prompt: "Produce the strongest evidence-grounded critique of the current graph and its main thesis.",
+    highlightStrategy: "critique"
+  },
+  {
+    id: "falsification-map",
+    categoryId: "strategic",
+    mode: "stress",
+    name: "Falsification Map",
+    description: "Find the cheapest tests that would disprove key beliefs.",
+    prompt: "Map the cheapest, clearest falsification tests for the graph's key claims.",
+    highlightStrategy: "falsification",
+    riskLevel: "high"
+  },
+  {
+    id: "prediction-tracker",
+    categoryId: "strategic",
+    mode: "evidence",
+    name: "Prediction Tracker",
+    description: "Find beliefs that imply measurable predictions.",
+    prompt: "Find beliefs that imply measurable predictions and suggest tracking signals.",
+    highlightStrategy: "predictions"
+  },
+  {
+    id: "belief-pagerank",
+    categoryId: "deep",
+    mode: "semantic",
+    name: "Belief PageRank",
+    description: "Identify structurally central beliefs.",
+    prompt: "Use graph centrality to identify the most structurally important beliefs.",
+    highlightStrategy: "centrality"
+  },
+  {
+    id: "underdetermination",
+    categoryId: "deep",
+    mode: "semantic",
+    name: "Underdetermination",
+    description: "Find places where evidence supports multiple explanations.",
+    prompt: "Find places where the same evidence could support multiple incompatible explanations.",
+    highlightStrategy: "underdetermination"
+  },
+  {
+    id: "confidence-propagation",
+    categoryId: "deep",
+    mode: "semantic",
+    name: "Confidence Propagation",
+    description: "Assess how uncertainty moves through the graph.",
+    prompt: "Explain how uncertainty propagates from weak or contested beliefs through downstream conclusions.",
+    highlightStrategy: "confidence-flow"
+  },
+  {
+    id: "argument-depth",
+    categoryId: "deep",
+    mode: "evidence",
+    name: "Argument Depth",
+    description: "Assess reasoning depth and chain quality.",
+    prompt: "Assess reasoning depth: where claims are shallow, deeply supported, or overextended.",
+    highlightStrategy: "depth"
+  },
+  {
+    id: "information-edge",
+    categoryId: "deep",
+    mode: "alpha",
+    name: "Information Edge",
+    description: "Find differentiated evidence or signals.",
+    prompt: "Find evidence, sources, or beliefs that could represent differentiated information edge.",
+    highlightStrategy: "information-edge"
+  },
+  {
+    id: "thesis-summary",
+    categoryId: "browse",
+    mode: "semantic",
+    name: "Thesis Summary",
+    description: "Summarize the graph's core thesis and support.",
+    prompt: "Summarize the graph's core thesis, strongest support, weakest support, and open questions.",
+    highlightStrategy: "summary"
+  },
+  {
+    id: "theme-deep-dive",
+    categoryId: "browse",
+    mode: "semantic",
+    name: "Theme Deep Dive",
+    description: "Deep dive into a named theme.",
+    prompt: "Deep dive into {input}. Explain the key beliefs, evidence, contradictions, and open questions.",
+    inputType: "theme",
+    highlightStrategy: "theme"
+  },
+  {
+    id: "belief-detail",
+    categoryId: "browse",
+    mode: "semantic",
+    name: "Belief Detail",
+    description: "Explain one belief and its graph neighborhood.",
+    prompt: "Explain {input} and its support, challenges, related beliefs, and downstream implications.",
+    inputType: "belief",
+    highlightStrategy: "belief"
+  },
+  {
+    id: "strongest-beliefs",
+    categoryId: "browse",
+    mode: "operational",
+    name: "Strongest Beliefs",
+    description: "Find the graph's strongest current beliefs.",
+    prompt: "Find the strongest current beliefs and explain why each one deserves confidence.",
+    highlightStrategy: "strongest"
+  },
+  {
+    id: "cross-theme-connection",
+    categoryId: "browse",
+    mode: "semantic",
+    name: "Cross-Theme Connections",
+    description: "Find bridges between themes.",
+    prompt: "Find meaningful connections across themes and explain which bridge beliefs matter.",
+    highlightStrategy: "bridges"
+  },
+  {
+    id: "research-velocity",
+    categoryId: "browse",
+    mode: "operational",
+    name: "Research Velocity",
+    description: "Summarize recent graph movement and momentum.",
+    prompt: "Assess research velocity: what changed recently, where progress is fastest, and what is stuck.",
+    highlightStrategy: "velocity"
+  },
+  {
+    id: "search",
+    categoryId: "browse",
+    mode: "semantic",
+    name: "Graph Search",
+    description: "Search the graph with semantic context.",
+    prompt: "Search the graph for {input}. Return the most relevant beliefs, evidence, and questions.",
+    inputType: "search",
+    highlightStrategy: "search"
+  },
+  {
+    id: "expert-coverage",
+    categoryId: "browse",
+    mode: "semantic",
+    name: "Expert Coverage",
+    description: "Assess coverage from expert/source perspectives.",
+    prompt: "Assess whether the graph has enough expert, primary, and dissenting coverage.",
+    highlightStrategy: "expert-coverage"
+  },
+  {
+    id: "value-chain-map",
+    categoryId: "browse",
+    mode: "semantic",
+    name: "Value Chain Map",
+    description: "Map entities, dependencies, and value-chain logic.",
+    prompt: "Map the value chain implied by this graph: entities, dependencies, pressure points, and missing links.",
+    highlightStrategy: "value-chain"
+  },
+  {
+    id: "meeting-brief",
+    categoryId: "prep",
+    mode: "semantic",
+    name: "Meeting Brief",
+    description: "Prepare a meeting brief from graph context.",
+    prompt: "Prepare a concise meeting brief using the graph: thesis, open questions, risks, and recommended asks.",
+    highlightStrategy: "brief"
+  },
+  {
+    id: "open-questions-entity",
+    categoryId: "prep",
+    mode: "semantic",
+    name: "Entity Open Questions",
+    description: "Find open questions about a specific entity.",
+    prompt: "Find the most important open questions about {input} and the beliefs those questions would unlock.",
+    inputType: "entity",
+    highlightStrategy: "entity-questions"
+  },
+  {
+    id: "company-context",
+    categoryId: "prep",
+    mode: "semantic",
+    name: "Company Context",
+    description: "Summarize graph context about a company.",
+    prompt: "Summarize what the graph knows about {input}: thesis relevance, evidence, risks, and open questions.",
+    inputType: "company",
+    highlightStrategy: "company"
+  },
+  {
+    id: "company-theme-fit",
+    categoryId: "prep",
+    mode: "semantic",
+    name: "Company Theme Fit",
+    description: "Assess how a company fits graph themes.",
+    prompt: "Assess how {input} fits the graph's themes and where the fit is weak or uncertain.",
+    inputType: "company",
+    highlightStrategy: "fit"
+  },
+  {
+    id: "company-comparison",
+    categoryId: "prep",
+    mode: "semantic",
+    name: "Company Comparison",
+    description: "Compare companies through graph context.",
+    prompt: "Compare {input} using graph beliefs, evidence, risks, and open questions.",
+    inputType: "company-list",
+    highlightStrategy: "comparison"
+  },
+  {
+    id: "questions-to-ask",
+    categoryId: "prep",
+    mode: "operational",
+    name: "Questions to Ask",
+    description: "Generate high-signal questions from graph gaps.",
+    prompt: "Generate the highest-signal questions to ask next, grounded in current graph gaps.",
+    highlightStrategy: "questions"
+  },
+  {
+    id: "beliefs-to-test",
+    categoryId: "prep",
+    mode: "stress",
+    name: "Beliefs to Test",
+    description: "Prioritize beliefs that should be tested next.",
+    prompt: "Prioritize the beliefs that should be tested next and explain the cheapest test for each.",
+    highlightStrategy: "tests",
+    riskLevel: "medium"
+  }
+];
+GRAPH_INTELLIGENCE_QUERIES.map((query) => {
+  const definition = query;
+  return {
+    ...definition,
+    tools: definition.tools ?? byMode(definition.mode)
+  };
+});
 function inferActorType(args) {
   if (args.sessionType === "agent") {
     return "agent";
@@ -62,7 +543,10 @@ function idOf(table) {
   return schema;
 }
 var NODE_TYPE = z.enum(["decision", "belief", "question", "theme", "deal", "topic", "claim", "evidence", "synthesis", "answer", "atomic_fact", "excerpt", "source", "company", "person", "investor", "function", "value_chain"]);
-var EDGE_TYPE = z.enum(["supports", "informs", "depends_on", "extracted_from", "contains", "tests", "supersedes", "responds_to", "belongs_to", "relates_to_thesis", "works_at", "invested_in", "competes_with", "participates_in", "founded_by", "evaluates", "performs", "function_in", "impacts", "raised_from", "mentioned_in", "perspective_on", "plays_theme", "answers", "explores", "qualifies", "based_on", "based_on_belief", "based_on_question", "blocked_by_contradiction", "informed_by_theme", "same_as", "reinforces", "parent_of", "child_of", "falsified_by", "exclusive_with", "collapses_if", "cascade_from", "counterfactual_of", "cascade_to", "mutually_exclusive", "correlates_with", "amplifies", "precondition_for", "in_tension_with", "strengthened_by", "weakened_by", "alternative_to", "subsumes", "validated_by", "required_for", "blocks", "prerequisite_for", "parallel_to", "corroborates", "extends", "same_source_as", "same_theme_as", "assumes", "would_predict", "analogous_to", "independent_of", "implements", "violates", "co_changes_with", "migrating_from", "migrating_to", "scoped_by", "about_entity", "entity_referenced_in", "contradicts", "cites", "summarizes", "related_to", "partially_answers", "refines", "branches_from"]);
+var EDGE_TYPE_VALUES = ["supports", "informs", "depends_on", "derived_from", "contains", "tests", "supersedes", "responds_to", "belongs_to", "relates_to_thesis", "works_at", "invested_in", "competes_with", "participates_in", "founded_by", "evaluates", "performs", "function_in", "impacts", "raised_from", "mentioned_in", "perspective_on", "plays_theme", "answers", "explores", "qualifies", "based_on", "based_on_belief", "based_on_question", "blocked_by_contradiction", "informed_by_theme", "same_as", "reinforces", "parent_of", "child_of", "falsified_by", "exclusive_with", "collapses_if", "cascade_from", "counterfactual_of", "cascade_to", "mutually_exclusive", "correlates_with", "amplifies", "precondition_for", "in_tension_with", "strengthened_by", "weakened_by", "alternative_to", "subsumes", "validated_by", "required_for", "blocks", "prerequisite_for", "parallel_to", "corroborates", "extends", "same_source_as", "same_theme_as", "assumes", "would_predict", "analogous_to", "independent_of", "implements", "violates", "co_changes_with", "migrating_from", "migrating_to", "scoped_by", "about_entity", "entity_referenced_in", "contradicts", "cites", "summarizes", "related_to", "partially_answers", "refines", "branches_from"];
+var STORAGE_EDGE_TYPE_VALUES = [...EDGE_TYPE_VALUES, "extracted_from"];
+z.enum(EDGE_TYPE_VALUES);
+var STORAGE_EDGE_TYPE = z.enum(STORAGE_EDGE_TYPE_VALUES);
 var TOPIC_STATUS = z.enum(["active", "archived", "watching"]);
 var TOPIC_VISIBILITY = z.enum(["private", "team", "firm", "external", "public"]);
 defineTable({
@@ -1547,7 +2031,7 @@ defineTable({
     "toNodeId": z.string().optional(),
     "sourceGlobalId": z.string().optional(),
     "targetGlobalId": z.string().optional(),
-    "edgeType": EDGE_TYPE,
+    "edgeType": STORAGE_EDGE_TYPE,
     "edgeTier": z.string().optional(),
     "domainNamespace": z.string().optional(),
     "constraint": z.string().optional(),
@@ -4318,6 +4802,128 @@ var edgePolicyManifest = {
     }
   ]
 };
+
+// ../contracts/src/tenant-client.contract.ts
+var TENANT_CLIENT_INSTALLABLE_PACKAGES = [
+  {
+    packageName: "@lucern/access-control",
+    role: "runtime_entrypoint",
+    directTenantImport: true
+  },
+  {
+    packageName: "@lucern/agent",
+    role: "platform_runtime",
+    directTenantImport: false
+  },
+  {
+    packageName: "@lucern/auth",
+    role: "sdk_dependency",
+    directTenantImport: false
+  },
+  {
+    packageName: "@lucern/cli",
+    role: "developer_tool",
+    directTenantImport: false
+  },
+  {
+    packageName: "@lucern/client-core",
+    role: "sdk_dependency",
+    directTenantImport: false
+  },
+  {
+    packageName: "@lucern/confidence",
+    role: "sdk_dependency",
+    directTenantImport: false
+  },
+  {
+    packageName: "@lucern/config",
+    role: "configuration",
+    directTenantImport: false
+  },
+  {
+    packageName: "@lucern/contracts",
+    role: "contract_entrypoint",
+    directTenantImport: true
+  },
+  {
+    packageName: "@lucern/control-plane",
+    role: "platform_runtime",
+    directTenantImport: false
+  },
+  {
+    packageName: "@lucern/developer-kit",
+    role: "developer_tool",
+    directTenantImport: false
+  },
+  {
+    packageName: "@lucern/events",
+    role: "sdk_dependency",
+    directTenantImport: false
+  },
+  {
+    packageName: "@lucern/graph-primitives",
+    role: "sdk_dependency",
+    directTenantImport: false
+  },
+  {
+    packageName: "@lucern/identity",
+    role: "component_runtime",
+    directTenantImport: false
+  },
+  {
+    packageName: "@lucern/mcp",
+    role: "runtime_entrypoint",
+    directTenantImport: true
+  },
+  {
+    packageName: "@lucern/pack-host",
+    role: "platform_runtime",
+    directTenantImport: false
+  },
+  {
+    packageName: "@lucern/pack-installer",
+    role: "developer_tool",
+    directTenantImport: false
+  },
+  {
+    packageName: "@lucern/proof-compiler",
+    role: "developer_tool",
+    directTenantImport: false
+  },
+  {
+    packageName: "@lucern/react",
+    role: "runtime_entrypoint",
+    directTenantImport: true
+  },
+  {
+    packageName: "@lucern/reasoning-kernel",
+    role: "component_runtime",
+    directTenantImport: false
+  },
+  {
+    packageName: "@lucern/sdk",
+    role: "runtime_entrypoint",
+    directTenantImport: true
+  },
+  {
+    packageName: "@lucern/server-core",
+    role: "platform_runtime",
+    directTenantImport: false
+  },
+  {
+    packageName: "@lucern/testing",
+    role: "test_support",
+    directTenantImport: false
+  },
+  {
+    packageName: "@lucern/types",
+    role: "contract_entrypoint",
+    directTenantImport: true
+  }
+];
+TENANT_CLIENT_INSTALLABLE_PACKAGES.map(
+  (entry) => entry.packageName
+);
 z.object({
   manifestVersion: z.literal("1.0.0"),
   rules: z.array(
@@ -5803,6 +6409,74 @@ var GET_GRAPH_STRUCTURE_ANALYSIS = {
   ontologyPrimitive: "graph",
   tier: "showcase"
 };
+var LIST_GRAPH_INTELLIGENCE_QUERIES = {
+  name: "list_graph_intelligence_queries",
+  description: "List the Graph Intelligence query catalog that powers structural graph analysis experiences. Returns categories, query IDs, prompt templates, modes, and the public tool plan each query can use.",
+  parameters: {
+    categoryId: {
+      type: "string",
+      description: "Optional category filter, such as problems or strategic"
+    },
+    mode: {
+      type: "string",
+      description: "Optional mode filter: core, bias, stress, operational, alpha, semantic, or evidence"
+    }
+  },
+  required: [],
+  response: {
+    description: "Graph Intelligence query catalog and mode-to-tool mapping",
+    fields: {
+      categories: "array \u2014 query categories",
+      queries: "array \u2014 query definitions with prompt templates and tools",
+      quickQueries: "array \u2014 recommended one-click query presets",
+      publicToolNamesByMode: "object \u2014 public tool names available to each Graph Intelligence mode"
+    }
+  },
+  ownerModule: "graph-intelligence",
+  ontologyPrimitive: "graph",
+  tier: "showcase"
+};
+var RUN_GRAPH_INTELLIGENCE_QUERY = {
+  name: "run_graph_intelligence_query",
+  description: "Run a named Graph Intelligence query against a tenant topic graph. Returns the selected query, prompt, deterministic graph-analysis bundle, graph context, and public tool plan for model synthesis.",
+  parameters: {
+    topicId: { type: "string", description: "Topic to analyze" },
+    queryId: {
+      type: "string",
+      description: "Graph Intelligence query ID, such as confirmation-bias, pre-mortem, or thesis-summary"
+    },
+    prompt: {
+      type: "string",
+      description: "Optional custom prompt for custom analysis runs"
+    },
+    input: {
+      type: "string",
+      description: "Optional entity, theme, belief, company, or search text for input-driven queries"
+    },
+    mode: {
+      type: "string",
+      description: "Optional mode override: core, bias, stress, operational, alpha, semantic, or evidence"
+    },
+    limit: {
+      type: "number",
+      description: "Maximum graph context rows to return"
+    }
+  },
+  required: ["topicId"],
+  response: {
+    description: "Graph Intelligence query result bundle ready for model or prompt-library synthesis",
+    fields: {
+      query: "object \u2014 selected query definition",
+      prompt: "string \u2014 resolved prompt template",
+      toolPlan: "array \u2014 public tools and args the model can call next",
+      analysis: "object \u2014 structure, coverage, gap, and confirmation-bias analysis",
+      context: "object \u2014 sampled beliefs, questions, evidence, edges, and contradictions"
+    }
+  },
+  ownerModule: "graph-intelligence",
+  ontologyPrimitive: "graph",
+  tier: "showcase"
+};
 var GET_FALSIFICATION_QUESTIONS = {
   name: "get_falsification_questions",
   description: "Generate Popperian falsification questions for beliefs. Like `git test` \u2014 identifies the questions most likely to disprove current beliefs. Karl Popper as a tool: surfaces what would need to be true to invalidate each belief.",
@@ -8378,6 +9052,8 @@ var MCP_TOOL_CONTRACTS = {
   // Graph intelligence (showcase)
   detect_confirmation_bias: DETECT_CONFIRMATION_BIAS,
   get_graph_structure_analysis: GET_GRAPH_STRUCTURE_ANALYSIS,
+  list_graph_intelligence_queries: LIST_GRAPH_INTELLIGENCE_QUERIES,
+  run_graph_intelligence_query: RUN_GRAPH_INTELLIGENCE_QUERY,
   get_falsification_questions: GET_FALSIFICATION_QUESTIONS,
   // Evidence operations (workhorse)
   search_evidence: SEARCH_EVIDENCE,
@@ -8560,6 +9236,8 @@ var MCP_ANALYSIS_PLATFORM_OPERATION_NAMES = [
   "traverse_graph",
   "get_graph_neighborhood",
   "get_graph_structure_analysis",
+  "list_graph_intelligence_queries",
+  "run_graph_intelligence_query",
   "find_contradictions",
   "flag_contradiction",
   "detect_confirmation_bias",
@@ -11180,6 +11858,15 @@ var edgesContracts = [
     args: queryLineageArgs
   })
 ];
+var graphIntelligenceQueryModes = [
+  "core",
+  "bias",
+  "stress",
+  "operational",
+  "alpha",
+  "semantic",
+  "evidence"
+];
 var traversalLayerSchema = z.enum([
   "L4",
   "L3",
@@ -11213,6 +11900,22 @@ var graphNeighborhoodArgs = z.object({
   topicId: z.string().optional().describe("Topic scope for edge lookup."),
   limit: z.number().optional().describe("Maximum edges to return.")
 });
+var graphIntelligenceModeSchema = z.enum([
+  graphIntelligenceQueryModes[0],
+  ...graphIntelligenceQueryModes.slice(1)
+]);
+var graphIntelligenceCatalogArgs = z.object({
+  categoryId: z.string().optional().describe("Optional query category filter."),
+  mode: graphIntelligenceModeSchema.optional().describe("Optional Graph Intelligence query mode filter.")
+});
+var graphIntelligenceRunArgs = z.object({
+  topicId: z.string().describe("Topic to analyze."),
+  queryId: z.string().optional().describe("Catalog query ID to run, such as pre-mortem."),
+  prompt: z.string().optional().describe("Custom prompt when queryId is omitted or overridden."),
+  input: z.string().optional().describe("Optional entity, theme, belief, company, or search text."),
+  mode: graphIntelligenceModeSchema.optional().describe("Optional query mode override for custom prompts."),
+  limit: z.number().optional().describe("Maximum graph context rows to return.")
+});
 var flagContradictionArgs = z.object({
   beliefA: z.string().describe("First belief in tension."),
   beliefB: z.string().describe("Second belief in tension."),
@@ -11318,6 +12021,38 @@ var graphContracts = [
       kind: "query"
     }
   }),
+  surfaceContract({
+    name: "list_graph_intelligence_queries",
+    kind: "query",
+    domain: "graph",
+    surfaceClass: "platform_public",
+    path: "/graph-intelligence/queries",
+    sdkNamespace: "graphAnalysis",
+    sdkMethod: "listGraphIntelligenceQueries",
+    summary: "List Graph Intelligence query catalog entries.",
+    convex: {
+      module: "contextCompiler",
+      functionName: "listGraphIntelligenceQueries",
+      kind: "query"
+    },
+    args: graphIntelligenceCatalogArgs
+  }),
+  surfaceContract({
+    name: "run_graph_intelligence_query",
+    kind: "query",
+    domain: "graph",
+    surfaceClass: "platform_public",
+    path: "/graph-intelligence/run",
+    sdkNamespace: "graphAnalysis",
+    sdkMethod: "runGraphIntelligenceQuery",
+    summary: "Run a Graph Intelligence query against a topic graph.",
+    convex: {
+      module: "contextCompiler",
+      functionName: "runGraphIntelligenceQuery",
+      kind: "query"
+    },
+    args: graphIntelligenceRunArgs
+  }),
   surfaceContract({
     name: "find_contradictions",
     kind: "query",