@lucern/contracts 1.0.12 → 1.0.14

package/dist/sdk-tools.contract.registry.js

@@ -1,7 +1,7 @@
 // src/tool-contracts.lifecycle.ts
 var CREATE_BELIEF = {
   name: "create_belief",
-  description: "Commit a new belief (knowledge unit) to the reasoning graph. Like `git commit` \u2014 creates an atomic, traceable knowledge object with a prior. Creation stores the vacuous opinion `(0, 0, 1, a)`; use modulate_confidence to record the first evidential update.",
+  description: "Commit a new belief (knowledge unit) to the reasoning graph. Like `git commit` \u2014 creates an atomic, traceable knowledge object with a prior. Creation stores the vacuous opinion `(0, 0, 1, a)`; attach supporting or contradicting evidence with create_evidence or link_evidence_to_belief to record evidential updates.",
   parameters: {
     canonicalText: {
       type: "string",
@@ -87,7 +87,7 @@ var REFINE_BELIEF = {
 };
 var MODULATE_CONFIDENCE = {
   name: "modulate_confidence",
-  description: "Record a confidence change for a belief. Like `git commit` to the credence log \u2014 an atomic, append-only write. Each modulation is a new entry in the history, not an overwrite. Scoring happens via merge; this tool records the individual data points. Pass the full subjective-logic tuple (`belief`, `disbelief`, `uncertainty`, `baseRate`) directly. If a caller only has a scalar probability, use `@lucern/sdk` helpers `opinionFromBaseRate`, `opinionFromDogmatic`, or `opinionFromProjected` to name the intended interpretation before calling this tool. Every modulation must cite a truth-bearing artifact: triggeringEvidenceId, triggeringQuestionId, triggeringAnswerId, triggeringContradictionId, or triggeringWorktreeId. Triggers: evidence_added, evidence_removed, contradiction_detected, contradiction_resolved, agent_assessment, worktree_outcome, worktree_completed, fusion, discount, deduction.",
+  description: "Internal-only subjective-logic ledger append. Like `git commit` to the credence log for the scoring engine \u2014 never an operator-facing way to assert confidence. Agents, SDK callers, CLI users, and MCP clients must instead create or link evidence with `evidenceRelation: supports|contradicts`; the kernel derives the next opinion from that evidence. This compatibility primitive is reserved for governed system scoring paths that already hold a full subjective-logic tuple and truth-bearing provenance.",
   parameters: {
     nodeId: { type: "string", description: "The belief to score" },
     belief: {
@@ -1695,10 +1695,11 @@ var LUCERN_ORIENT = {
       workflow: "array - recommended branch -> investigate -> prove gate -> merge workflow",
       grammarMap: "array - primitive-to-git-analogy map for topics, campaigns, worktrees, beliefs, questions, evidence, edges, contradictions, and gates",
       firstMoves: "array - recommended first tools for a cold-start agent",
-      receiptRules: "array - how to interpret candidateCounts, broadening, coverageWarning, and noDefaultGlobalScan",
+      receiptRules: "array - how to interpret candidateCounts, broadening, coverageWarning, narrativeCoverage, synthesisLints, and noDefaultGlobalScan",
       safetyRules: "array - mutation and completion rules that preserve reasoning lineage",
       toolMap: "array | undefined - situation-to-tool routing map when requested",
       examples: "array | undefined - concrete tool-call examples when requested",
+      futureCapabilities: "array | undefined - exemplar, gauntlet, trace-corpus, and native-model-training capabilities when requested",
       suggestedNextCalls: "array - safe next tool calls for the current situation"
     }
   },
@@ -1861,7 +1862,7 @@ var SEARCH_EVIDENCE = {
 };
 var CREATE_EVIDENCE = {
   name: "create_evidence",
-  description: "Commit evidence to the reasoning graph. Like `git commit` \u2014 creates a traceable evidence record with canonical public IDs. Optionally links the evidence to a belief or question in the same operation.",
+  description: "Commit evidence to the reasoning graph. Like `git commit` \u2014 creates a traceable evidence record with canonical public IDs. Optionally links the evidence to a belief or question in the same operation. When evidence bears on beliefs, state whether it supports or contradicts; SL confidence is derived from these evidence relations.",
   parameters: {
     topicId: { type: "string", description: "Topic scope" },
     text: { type: "string", description: "Canonical evidence text" },
@@ -1872,7 +1873,20 @@ var CREATE_EVIDENCE = {
     },
     weight: {
       type: "number",
-      description: "Support weight: -1.0 (contradicts) to +1.0 (supports)"
+      description: "Optional support weight: -1.0 (contradicts) to +1.0 (supports). If omitted, evidenceRelation + confidence determine the weight."
+    },
+    evidenceRelation: {
+      type: "string",
+      enum: ["supports", "contradicts"],
+      description: "Canonical relation to targetId/linkedBeliefNodeId. Prefer this over relying on signed weight inference."
+    },
+    confidence: {
+      type: "number",
+      description: "Confidence in the evidence relation, 0.0 to 1.0"
+    },
+    beliefRelations: {
+      type: "array",
+      description: "Optional additional belief relations: [{ beliefId|beliefNodeId|targetId, evidenceRelation|relation, confidence?, weight?, rationale? }]. Use one evidence node with multiple relations when the same fact supports or contradicts several beliefs."
     },
     metadata: {
       type: "object",
@@ -1982,7 +1996,7 @@ var LINK_EVIDENCE = {
 };
 var LINK_EVIDENCE_TO_BELIEF = {
   name: "link_evidence_to_belief",
-  description: "Link evidence to a belief with a support weight. Like `git add` \u2014 stages evidence in support of (or against) a belief. The weight ranges from -1.0 (strongly contradicts) to +1.0 (strongly supports).",
+  description: "Link evidence to a belief with a support weight. Like `git add` \u2014 stages evidence in support of (or against) a belief. The weight ranges from -1.0 (strongly contradicts) to +1.0 (strongly supports). This relation appends to the SL confidence ledger; do not hand-write confidence separately.",
   parameters: {
     evidenceId: { type: "string", description: "The evidence node ID" },
     beliefId: { type: "string", description: "The belief node ID" },
@@ -1990,9 +2004,18 @@ var LINK_EVIDENCE_TO_BELIEF = {
       type: "number",
       description: "Support weight: -1.0 (contradicts) to +1.0 (supports)"
     },
+    evidenceRelation: {
+      type: "string",
+      enum: ["supports", "contradicts"],
+      description: "Canonical semantic relation. If omitted, the sign of weight is used."
+    },
+    confidence: {
+      type: "number",
+      description: "Confidence in this evidence-to-belief relation, 0.0 to 1.0"
+    },
     rationale: { type: "string", description: "Why this evidence is relevant" }
   },
-  required: ["evidenceId", "beliefId", "weight"],
+  required: ["evidenceId", "beliefId"],
   response: {
     description: "The created edge linking evidence to belief",
     fields: {
@@ -2820,7 +2843,9 @@ var COMPILE_CONTEXT = {
       recentEvidence: "array \u2014 recent evidence ranked for this query",
       contradictions: "array \u2014 unresolved contradiction records",
       relatedEntities: "array | undefined \u2014 ranked ontological entities in scope",
-      contextNarrative: "array \u2014 guidance for prompt assembly",
+      contextNarrative: "array \u2014 ordered synthesis blocks with kind/text, starting with executive_summary and canonical narrative blocks before raw objects",
+      retrievalReceipt: "object \u2014 candidateCounts, coverageWarning, narrativeCoverage, synthesisLints, and suggestedNextActions",
+      narrativeCoverage: "object \u2014 recordsSynthesized, recordsNamed, recordsOmitted, and blocksEmitted for the narrative",
       injectionPolicy: "object \u2014 token-budgeted section selections",
       diagnostics: "object \u2014 scoring and utilization telemetry"
     }