@loomhelm/multi-task-flow 0.2.7 → 0.2.8

package/toolkit/skills/multi-task-flow/node_modules/zod/src/v4/classic/tests/intersection.test.ts

@@ -1,334 +0,0 @@
-import { expect, expectTypeOf, test } from "vitest";
-import type { util } from "zod/v4/core";
-
-import * as z from "zod/v4";
-
-test("object intersection", () => {
-  const A = z.object({ a: z.string() });
-  const B = z.object({ b: z.string() });
-
-  const C = z.intersection(A, B); // BaseC.merge(HasID);
-  type C = z.infer<typeof C>;
-  expectTypeOf<C>().toEqualTypeOf<{ a: string } & { b: string }>();
-  const data = { a: "foo", b: "foo" };
-  expect(C.parse(data)).toEqual(data);
-  expect(() => C.parse({ a: "foo" })).toThrow();
-});
-
-test("object intersection: loose", () => {
-  const A = z.looseObject({ a: z.string() });
-  const B = z.object({ b: z.string() });
-
-  const C = z.intersection(A, B); // BaseC.merge(HasID);
-  type C = z.infer<typeof C>;
-  expectTypeOf<C>().toEqualTypeOf<{ a: string; [x: string]: unknown } & { b: string }>();
-  const data = { a: "foo", b: "foo", c: "extra" };
-  expect(C.parse(data)).toEqual(data);
-  expect(() => C.parse({ a: "foo" })).toThrow();
-});
-
-test("object intersection: strict + strip", () => {
-  const A = z.strictObject({ a: z.string() });
-  const B = z.object({ b: z.string() });
-
-  const C = z.intersection(A, B);
-  type C = z.infer<typeof C>;
-  expectTypeOf<C>().toEqualTypeOf<{ a: string } & { b: string }>();
-
-  // Keys recognized by either side should work
-  expect(C.parse({ a: "foo", b: "bar" })).toEqual({ a: "foo", b: "bar" });
-
-  // Extra keys are stripped (follows strip behavior from B)
-  expect(C.parse({ a: "foo", b: "bar", c: "extra" })).toEqual({ a: "foo", b: "bar" });
-});
-
-test("object intersection: strict + strict", () => {
-  const A = z.strictObject({ a: z.string() });
-  const B = z.strictObject({ b: z.string() });
-
-  const C = z.intersection(A, B);
-
-  // Keys recognized by either side should work
-  expect(C.parse({ a: "foo", b: "bar" })).toEqual({ a: "foo", b: "bar" });
-
-  // Keys unrecognized by BOTH sides should error
-  const result = C.safeParse({ a: "foo", b: "bar", c: "extra" });
-  expect(result.error?.issues).toMatchInlineSnapshot(`
-    [
-      {
-        "code": "unrecognized_keys",
-        "keys": [
-          "c",
-        ],
-        "message": "Unrecognized key: "c"",
-        "path": [],
-      },
-    ]
-  `);
-});
-
-test("object intersection strips __proto__ from pass-through operands", () => {
-  const cases = [
-    [
-      z.intersection(z.object({ name: z.string() }), z.unknown()),
-      JSON.parse('{"__proto__":{"isAdmin":true},"name":"alice"}'),
-      { name: "alice" },
-    ],
-    [z.intersection(z.record(z.string(), z.unknown()), z.any()), JSON.parse('{"__proto__":{},"a":1}'), { a: 1 }],
-  ] as const;
-
-  for (const [schema, input, expected] of cases) {
-    const parsed = schema.parse(input);
-    expect(parsed).toEqual(expected);
-    expect(Object.getPrototypeOf(parsed)).toBe(Object.prototype);
-    expect(Object.prototype.hasOwnProperty.call(parsed, "__proto__")).toBe(false);
-  }
-});
-
-test("deep intersection", () => {
-  const Animal = z.object({
-    properties: z.object({
-      is_animal: z.boolean(),
-    }),
-  });
-  const Cat = z.intersection(
-    z.object({
-      properties: z.object({
-        jumped: z.boolean(),
-      }),
-    }),
-    Animal
-  );
-
-  type Cat = util.Flatten<z.infer<typeof Cat>>;
-  expectTypeOf<Cat>().toEqualTypeOf<{ properties: { is_animal: boolean } & { jumped: boolean } }>();
-  const a = Cat.safeParse({ properties: { is_animal: true, jumped: true } });
-  expect(a.data!.properties).toEqual({ is_animal: true, jumped: true });
-});
-
-test("deep intersection of arrays", async () => {
-  const Author = z.object({
-    posts: z.array(
-      z.object({
-        post_id: z.number(),
-      })
-    ),
-  });
-  const Registry = z.intersection(
-    Author,
-    z.object({
-      posts: z.array(
-        z.object({
-          title: z.string(),
-        })
-      ),
-    })
-  );
-
-  const posts = [
-    { post_id: 1, title: "Novels" },
-    { post_id: 2, title: "Fairy tales" },
-  ];
-  const cat = Registry.parse({ posts });
-  expect(cat.posts).toEqual(posts);
-  const asyncCat = await Registry.parseAsync({ posts });
-  expect(asyncCat.posts).toEqual(posts);
-});
-
-test("invalid intersection types", async () => {
-  const numberIntersection = z.intersection(
-    z.number(),
-    z.number().transform((x) => x + 1)
-  );
-
-  expect(() => {
-    numberIntersection.parse(1234);
-  }).toThrowErrorMatchingInlineSnapshot(`[Error: Unmergable intersection. Error path: []]`);
-});
-
-test("invalid array merge (incompatible lengths)", async () => {
-  const stringArrInt = z.intersection(
-    z.string().array(),
-    z
-      .string()
-      .array()
-      .transform((val) => [...val, "asdf"])
-  );
-
-  expect(() => stringArrInt.safeParse(["asdf", "qwer"])).toThrowErrorMatchingInlineSnapshot(
-    `[Error: Unmergable intersection. Error path: []]`
-  );
-});
-
-test("invalid array merge (incompatible elements)", async () => {
-  const stringArrInt = z.intersection(
-    z.string().array(),
-    z
-      .string()
-      .array()
-      .transform((val) => [...val.slice(0, -1), "asdf"])
-  );
-
-  expect(() => stringArrInt.safeParse(["asdf", "qwer"])).toThrowErrorMatchingInlineSnapshot(
-    `[Error: Unmergable intersection. Error path: [1]]`
-  );
-});
-
-test("invalid object merge", async () => {
-  const Cat = z.object({
-    phrase: z.string().transform((val) => `${val} Meow`),
-  });
-  const Dog = z.object({
-    phrase: z.string().transform((val) => `${val} Woof`),
-  });
-  const CatDog = z.intersection(Cat, Dog);
-
-  expect(() => CatDog.parse({ phrase: "Hello, my name is CatDog." })).toThrowErrorMatchingInlineSnapshot(
-    `[Error: Unmergable intersection. Error path: ["phrase"]]`
-  );
-});
-
-test("invalid deep merge of object and array combination", async () => {
-  const University = z.object({
-    students: z.array(
-      z.object({
-        name: z.string().transform((val) => `Student name: ${val}`),
-      })
-    ),
-  });
-  const Registry = z.intersection(
-    University,
-    z.object({
-      students: z.array(
-        z.object({
-          name: z.string(),
-          surname: z.string(),
-        })
-      ),
-    })
-  );
-
-  const students = [{ name: "John", surname: "Doe" }];
-
-  expect(() => Registry.parse({ students })).toThrowErrorMatchingInlineSnapshot(
-    `[Error: Unmergable intersection. Error path: ["students",0,"name"]]`
-  );
-});
-
-// A record's key schema says which keys that record GOVERNS; it is not a predicate
-// every key in the result must satisfy. TypeScript works the same way: in
-// `{name: string} & Record<`S_${string}`, string>` the index signature constrains
-// only the keys matching it, so `name` is fine. So a key one side does not govern
-// is reconciled against the other side, exactly as unrecognized_keys already is.
-test("a record's key schema governs only its own keys inside an intersection", () => {
-  const Obj = z.object({ name: z.string() });
-  const value = { name: "a", S_a: "s" };
-
-  // Every key-schema flavor behaves the same: `name` belongs to the object side.
-  expect(z.intersection(Obj, z.record(z.string().regex(/^S_/), z.string())).parse(value)).toEqual(value);
-  expect(z.intersection(Obj, z.record(z.templateLiteral(["S_", z.string()]), z.string())).parse(value)).toEqual(value);
-  expect(z.intersection(Obj, z.partialRecord(z.enum(["p1", "p2"]), z.string())).parse({ name: "a", p1: "x" })).toEqual({
-    name: "a",
-    p1: "x",
-  });
-  expect(z.intersection(Obj, z.record(z.enum(["p1"]), z.string())).parse({ name: "a", p1: "x" })).toEqual({
-    name: "a",
-    p1: "x",
-  });
-
-  // A key the record DOES govern still has its value validated across the intersection.
-  const governed = z.intersection(z.object({ S_x: z.number() }), z.record(z.string().regex(/^S_/), z.string()));
-  expect(governed.safeParse({ S_x: 1 }).success).toBe(false);
-
-  // A key NEITHER side governs is still rejected.
-  const strict = z.intersection(z.strictObject({ name: z.string() }), z.record(z.string().regex(/^S_/), z.string()));
-  expect(strict.parse(value)).toEqual(value);
-  expect(strict.safeParse({ ...value, evil: "q" }).success).toBe(false);
-
-  // Standalone, a record still rejects a key it does not govern.
-  expect(z.record(z.string().regex(/^S_/), z.string()).safeParse({ S_a: "s", bad: "x" }).success).toBe(false);
-});
-
-test("partialRecord reports an out-of-set key as unrecognized, not invalid", () => {
-  const enumKeys = z.partialRecord(z.enum(["a", "b"]), z.string()).safeParse({ a: "x", zzz: "q" });
-  expect(enumKeys.success).toBe(false);
-  expect(enumKeys.error!.issues[0].code).toBe("unrecognized_keys");
-
-  // A regex key schema still reports the failure as an invalid key.
-  const regexKeys = z.record(z.string().regex(/^S_/), z.string()).safeParse({ S_a: "x", zzz: "q" });
-  expect(regexKeys.success).toBe(false);
-  expect(regexKeys.error!.issues[0].code).toBe("invalid_key");
-});
-
-test("intersection operands run their own checks, refinements and transforms", () => {
-  let checks = 0;
-  const failing = z.intersection(
-    z.strictObject({ x: z.string() }).check(() => {
-      checks++;
-    }),
-    z.strictObject({ a: z.string() }).superRefine((_data, ctx) => {
-      checks++;
-      ctx.addIssue({ code: "custom", message: "boom" });
-    })
-  );
-  expect(failing.safeParse({ x: "test", a: "hello" })).toMatchObject({
-    success: false,
-    error: { issues: [{ code: "custom", message: "boom" }] },
-  });
-  expect(checks).toBe(2);
-
-  const transformed = z.intersection(
-    z.strictObject({ x: z.string() }).transform((v) => ({ ...v, x: v.x.toUpperCase() })),
-    z.strictObject({ a: z.string() }).transform((v) => ({ ...v, seen: true }))
-  );
-  expect(transformed.parse({ x: "test", a: "hello" })).toEqual({ x: "TEST", a: "hello", seen: true });
-});
-
-test("intersection operands apply defaults, including through a nested intersection", () => {
-  const inner = z.intersection(
-    z.strictObject({ x: z.string().default("X default"), y: z.number() }),
-    z.strictObject({ z: z.boolean() })
-  );
-  const schema = z.intersection(inner, z.strictObject({ a: z.string() }));
-  expectTypeOf<z.output<typeof schema>>().toEqualTypeOf<{ x: string; y: number } & { z: boolean } & { a: string }>();
-
-  expect(schema.parse({ y: 34, z: true, a: "hello" })).toEqual({ x: "X default", y: 34, z: true, a: "hello" });
-});
-
-test("a record operand runs its own refinements inside an intersection", () => {
-  let calls = 0;
-  const schema = z
-    .record(z.enum(["p1", "p2"]), z.string())
-    .superRefine((_data, ctx) => {
-      calls++;
-      ctx.addIssue({ code: "custom", message: "record refined" });
-    })
-    .and(z.strictObject({ name: z.string() }));
-
-  expect(schema.safeParse({ p1: "a", p2: "b", name: "n" })).toMatchObject({
-    success: false,
-    error: { issues: [{ code: "custom", message: "record refined" }] },
-  });
-  expect(calls).toBe(1);
-});
-
-test("a strict object nested under an operand keeps its strictness", () => {
-  const schema = z.intersection(
-    z.object({ inner: z.strictObject({ a: z.string() }) }),
-    z.object({ other: z.string() })
-  );
-
-  expect(schema.parse({ inner: { a: "x" }, other: "y" })).toEqual({ inner: { a: "x" }, other: "y" });
-  expect(schema.safeParse({ inner: { a: "x", extra: 1 }, other: "y" })).toMatchObject({
-    success: false,
-    error: { issues: [{ code: "unrecognized_keys", keys: ["extra"], path: ["inner"] }] },
-  });
-});
-
-test("a strict object composes with a refined object", () => {
-  const A = z.object({ key1: z.boolean() }).strict();
-  const B = z.object({ key2: z.boolean() }).refine(({ key2 }) => key2, "key2 must be true");
-
-  expect(A.and(B).parse({ key1: true, key2: true })).toEqual({ key1: true, key2: true });
-  expect(A.and(B).safeParse({ key1: true, key2: false }).success).toBe(false);
-});

package/toolkit/skills/multi-task-flow/node_modules/zod/src/v4/classic/tests/issue-schema.test.ts

@@ -1,215 +0,0 @@
-import { afterEach, expect, test } from "vitest";
-import * as z from "zod/v4";
-
-afterEach(() => {
-  z.config({ customError: undefined });
-});
-
-/** Error maps run on the first read of `error`, so a test that only observes them reads it. */
-const fail = (r: { error?: unknown }) => r.error;
-
-/** Collects the owning schema's registered metadata for every issue an error map sees. */
-function captureMeta(): { seen: (z.core.GlobalMeta | undefined)[] } {
-  const seen: (z.core.GlobalMeta | undefined)[] = [];
-  z.config({
-    customError: (issue) => {
-      seen.push(issue.schema && z.globalRegistry.get(issue.schema));
-      return undefined;
-    },
-  });
-  return { seen };
-}
-
-test("check-originated issues expose the owning schema", () => {
-  const { seen } = captureMeta();
-
-  fail(z.object({ name: z.string().min(5).meta({ title: "Name" }) }).safeParse({ name: "ab" }));
-  fail(z.string().max(2).meta({ title: "Max" }).safeParse("abc"));
-  fail(z.email().meta({ title: "Email" }).safeParse("nope"));
-  fail(z.number().multipleOf(3).meta({ title: "Multiple" }).safeParse(4));
-  fail(z.array(z.string()).min(2).meta({ title: "Array" }).safeParse([]));
-
-  expect(seen).toEqual([
-    { title: "Name" },
-    { title: "Max" },
-    { title: "Email" },
-    { title: "Multiple" },
-    { title: "Array" },
-  ]);
-});
-
-test("schema-originated issues expose the owning schema", () => {
-  const { seen } = captureMeta();
-
-  fail(z.object({ name: z.string().min(5).meta({ title: "Name" }) }).safeParse({ name: 123 }));
-  fail(z.email().meta({ title: "Email" }).safeParse(123));
-
-  expect(seen).toEqual([{ title: "Name" }, { title: "Email" }]);
-});
-
-test("refinements attribute to the refined schema, not the internal check schema", () => {
-  const { seen } = captureMeta();
-
-  fail(
-    z
-      .string()
-      .refine(() => false)
-      .meta({ title: "Refine" })
-      .safeParse("abc")
-  );
-  fail(
-    z
-      .string()
-      .superRefine((_, ctx) => ctx.addIssue({ code: "custom", message: "" }))
-      .meta({ title: "SuperRefine" })
-      .safeParse("abc")
-  );
-
-  expect(seen).toEqual([{ title: "Refine" }, { title: "SuperRefine" }]);
-});
-
-test("the innermost schema owns the issue", () => {
-  const { seen } = captureMeta();
-
-  fail(
-    z
-      .array(z.string().min(5).meta({ title: "Element" }))
-      .meta({ title: "Array" })
-      .safeParse(["ab"])
-  );
-  fail(
-    z
-      .string()
-      .pipe(z.string().min(5).meta({ title: "Target" }))
-      .meta({ title: "Pipe" })
-      .safeParse("ab")
-  );
-  fail(
-    z
-      .looseObject({})
-      .check(z.property("a", z.string().meta({ title: "Property" })))
-      .meta({ title: "Object" })
-      .safeParse({ a: 1 })
-  );
-
-  expect(seen).toEqual([{ title: "Element" }, { title: "Target" }, { title: "Property" }]);
-});
-
-test("issues carrying no usable `inst` still get the owning schema", () => {
-  const { seen } = captureMeta();
-
-  // A hand-pushed issue may carry no inst at all, and ctx.addIssue(string) puts the check's def — not a Zod object — on inst.
-  fail(
-    z
-      .string()
-      .check((payload) => {
-        payload.issues.push({ code: "custom", input: payload.value });
-      })
-      .meta({ title: "Bare" })
-      .safeParse("abc")
-  );
-  const shorthand = z
-    .string()
-    .superRefine((_, ctx) => ctx.addIssue("bad stuff"))
-    .meta({ title: "Shorthand" })
-    .safeParse("abc");
-
-  expect(seen).toEqual([{ title: "Bare" }]);
-  expect(shorthand.error!.issues[0].message).toEqual("bad stuff");
-});
-
-test("async checks expose the owning schema", async () => {
-  const { seen } = captureMeta();
-
-  fail(
-    await z
-      .string()
-      .refine(async () => false)
-      .meta({ title: "Async" })
-      .safeParseAsync("abc")
-  );
-
-  expect(seen).toEqual([{ title: "Async" }]);
-});
-
-test("the owning schema is the clone `.meta()` registered, not the pre-metadata schema", () => {
-  const bare = z.string().min(5);
-  const labeled = bare.meta({ title: "Labeled" });
-  const seen: unknown[] = [];
-  z.config({
-    customError: (issue) => {
-      seen.push(issue.schema === labeled);
-      return undefined;
-    },
-  });
-
-  fail(labeled.safeParse("ab"));
-
-  expect(seen).toEqual([true]);
-});
-
-test("`inst` keeps its meaning and `schema` stays off the finalized issue", () => {
-  const insts: string[] = [];
-  z.config({
-    customError: (issue) => {
-      insts.push(issue.inst!.constructor.name);
-      return undefined;
-    },
-  });
-
-  const tooSmall = z.string().min(5).safeParse("ab").error!;
-  const wrongType = z.string().safeParse(123).error!;
-
-  expect(insts).toEqual(["$ZodCheckMinLength", "ZodString"]);
-  expect(Object.keys(tooSmall.issues[0])).not.toContain("schema");
-  expect(Object.keys(wrongType.issues[0])).not.toContain("schema");
-});
-
-test("every error map kind receives the owning schema", () => {
-  const seen: Record<string, z.core.GlobalMeta | undefined> = {};
-  const capture = (key: string) => (issue: { schema?: z.core.$ZodType | undefined }) => {
-    seen[key] = issue.schema && z.globalRegistry.get(issue.schema);
-    return undefined;
-  };
-
-  fail(
-    z
-      .string()
-      .min(5, { error: capture("check") })
-      .meta({ title: "Check" })
-      .safeParse("ab")
-  );
-
-  // A schema-bound map is only consulted for issues the schema itself raised, so this one needs a type error.
-  fail(
-    z
-      .string({ error: capture("schema") })
-      .meta({ title: "Schema" })
-      .safeParse(123)
-  );
-
-  fail(
-    z
-      .string()
-      .min(5)
-      .meta({ title: "Parse" })
-      .safeParse("ab", { error: capture("parse") })
-  );
-
-  z.config({ customError: capture("customError") });
-  fail(z.string().min(5).meta({ title: "Custom" }).safeParse("ab"));
-
-  // localeError carries the default English locale, so it is restored rather than cleared.
-  const localeError = z.config().localeError;
-  z.config({ customError: undefined, localeError: capture("localeError") });
-  fail(z.string().min(5).meta({ title: "Locale" }).safeParse("ab"));
-  z.config({ localeError });
-
-  expect(seen).toEqual({
-    check: { title: "Check" },
-    schema: { title: "Schema" },
-    parse: { title: "Parse" },
-    customError: { title: "Custom" },
-    localeError: { title: "Locale" },
-  });
-});

package/toolkit/skills/multi-task-flow/node_modules/zod/src/v4/classic/tests/jitless-allows-eval.test.ts

@@ -1,39 +0,0 @@
-import { expect, test } from "vitest";
-import * as z from "zod/v4";
-import * as core from "zod/v4/core";
-
-const { allowsEval } = core.util;
-
-// Regression test for the CSP feature-probe issue (#4461, #5414):
-// `allowsEval` used to always invoke `new Function("")` even when the
-// user had opted into `z.config({ jitless: true })`, producing a
-// `securitypolicyviolation` report on strict-CSP pages (no 'unsafe-eval')
-// that Chrome DevTools surfaces as an Issue.
-//
-// The fix: when `globalConfig.jitless` is true, `allowsEval.value` returns `false` without triggering the probe. This test lives in its own file because vitest isolates ESM graphs per file, so the cached `allowsEval.value` is fresh and is never accessed before the config mutation below.
-
-test("globalConfig.jitless=true short-circuits the allowsEval probe", () => {
-  // Set BEFORE first access to allowsEval.value — the getter is memoised via `cached()`, so the contract is "configure at app entry".
-  z.config({ jitless: true });
-
-  // Sanity: config is wired
-  expect(core.globalConfig.jitless).toBe(true);
-
-  // Spy: if the probe were still attempted, `new Function("")` would be called. Swap the global `Function` constructor with a throwing stub and verify the stub is NEVER invoked.
-  const origFunction = globalThis.Function;
-  let probeAttempted = false;
-  // @ts-expect-error assigning a stub to the Function global for the test
-  globalThis.Function = function StubFunction(..._args: unknown[]): never {
-    probeAttempted = true;
-    throw new Error("allowsEval probe should have been skipped under jitless=true");
-  };
-
-  try {
-    expect(allowsEval.value).toBe(false);
-    expect(probeAttempted).toBe(false);
-  } finally {
-    globalThis.Function = origFunction;
-    // Restore config so other test files in the same worker see default
-    delete core.globalConfig.jitless;
-  }
-});

package/toolkit/skills/multi-task-flow/node_modules/zod/src/v4/classic/tests/json.test.ts

@@ -1,109 +0,0 @@
-import { expect, test } from "vitest";
-
-test("placeholder test", () => {
-  expect(2).toBe(2);
-});
-// test("overload types", () => {
-//   const schema = z.string().json();
-//   util.assertEqual<typeof schema, z.ZodString>(true);
-//   const schema2 = z.string().json(z.number());
-//   util.assertEqual<typeof schema2, z.ZodPipe<z.ZodTransform<any, string>, z.ZodNumber>>(true);
-//   const r2 = schema2.parse("12");
-//   util.assertEqual<number, typeof r2>(true);
-// });
-// test("parse string to json", async () => {
-//   const Env = z.object({
-//     myJsonConfig: z.string().jsonString(z.object({ foo: z.number() })),
-//     someOtherValue: z.string(),
-//   });
-
-//   expect(
-//     Env.parse({
-//       myJsonConfig: '{ "foo": 123 }',
-//       someOtherValue: "abc",
-//     })
-//   ).toEqual({
-//     myJsonConfig: { foo: 123 },
-//     someOtherValue: "abc",
-//   });
-
-//   const invalidValues = Env.safeParse({
-//     myJsonConfig: '{"foo": "not a number!"}',
-//     someOtherValue: null,
-//   });
-//   expect(JSON.parse(JSON.stringify(invalidValues))).toEqual({
-//     success: false,
-//     error: {
-//       name: "ZodError",
-//       issues: [
-//         {
-//           code: "invalid_type",
-//           expected: "number",
-//           input: "not a number!",
-//           received: "string",
-//           path: ["myJsonConfig", "foo"],
-//           message: "Expected number, received string",
-//         },
-//         {
-//           code: "invalid_type",
-//           expected: "string",
-//           input: null,
-//           received: "null",
-//           path: ["someOtherValue"],
-//           message: "Expected string, received null",
-//         },
-//       ],
-//     },
-//   });
-
-//   const invalidJsonSyntax = Env.safeParse({
-//     myJsonConfig: "This is not valid json",
-//     someOtherValue: null,
-//   });
-//   expect(JSON.parse(JSON.stringify(invalidJsonSyntax))).toMatchObject({
-//     success: false,
-//     error: {
-//       name: "ZodError",
-//       issues: [
-//         {
-//           code: "invalid_string",
-//           input: {
-//             _def: {
-//               catchall: {
-//                 _def: {
-//                   typeName: "ZodNever",
-//                 },
-//               },
-//               typeName: "ZodObject",
-//               unknownKeys: "strip",
-//             },
-//           },
-//           validation: "json",
-//           message: "Invalid json",
-//           path: ["myJsonConfig"],
-//         },
-//         {
-//           code: "invalid_type",
-//           expected: "string",
-//           input: null,
-//           received: "null",
-//           path: ["someOtherValue"],
-//           message: "Expected string, received null",
-//         },
-//       ],
-//     },
-//   });
-// });
-
-// test("no argument", () => {
-//   const schema = z.string().json();
-//   util.assertEqual<typeof schema, z.ZodString>(true);
-//   z.string().json().parse(`{}`);
-//   z.string().json().parse(`null`);
-//   z.string().json().parse(`12`);
-//   z.string().json().parse(`{ "test": "test"}`);
-//   expect(() => z.string().json().parse(`asdf`)).toThrow();
-//   expect(() => z.string().json().parse(`{ "test": undefined }`)).toThrow();
-//   expect(() => z.string().json().parse(`{ "test": 12n }`)).toThrow();
-//   expect(() => z.string().json().parse(`{ test: "test" }`)).toThrow();
-// });