@longtable/provider-claude 0.1.35 → 0.1.37

package/dist/skills.js

@@ -59,7 +59,7 @@ function baseSkillSpecs() {
                 "- Treat Claude's structured question surface as transport; LongTable state records are the source of truth.",
                 "- When an MCP `elicit_question` tool is available in the client, use it first so the checkpoint can be shown through the native elicitation surface and recorded in LongTable state.",
                 "- Use `longtable question --print --provider claude --prompt \"...\"` only as a fallback when MCP/native structured elicitation is unavailable, unsupported, declined, canceled, or blocked by the client.",
-                "- If `CURRENT.md` shows a pending required checkpoint, do not proceed until `longtable decide --question <id> --answer <value>` records the researcher's choice.",
+                "- If `CURRENT.md` shows a pending required checkpoint, ask the researcher for a selection and wait. Do not choose or record `longtable decide --question <id> --answer <value>` unless the researcher explicitly provides that value.",
                 "- Preserve open tensions and authorship instead of forcing closure.",
                 "- Disclose consulted roles with `LongTable consulted: ...` when a role is foregrounded.",
                 "- Label unsupported external claims as inference or estimate.",
@@ -189,6 +189,39 @@ function baseSkillSpecs() {
         }
     ];
 }
+function mustAskQuestionsForRole(role) {
+    const common = [
+        "What researcher judgment would be hidden if this role gives a confident answer now?",
+        "What evidence or project-state reference would change this role's recommendation?"
+    ];
+    const byRole = {
+        editor: [
+            "What is the strongest venue-facing contribution claim, and what would make it overreach?"
+        ],
+        reviewer: [
+            "What objection would a skeptical reviewer raise first, and what missing evidence would answer it?"
+        ],
+        theory_critic: [
+            "Which construct boundary or theoretical assumption must stay explicit before the claim is revised?"
+        ],
+        methods_critic: [
+            "Which design choice, comparison, sample, or causal claim is being treated as settled too early?"
+        ],
+        measurement_auditor: [
+            "What exactly is being measured, and what would count as construct drift or invalid substitution?"
+        ],
+        ethics_reviewer: [
+            "Who could be misrepresented, exposed, or burdened if this design choice is accepted?"
+        ],
+        voice_keeper: [
+            "Which part of the researcher's own narrative or uncertainty should not be polished away?"
+        ],
+        venue_strategist: [
+            "Which venue expectation is being optimized for, and what positioning tradeoff follows from it?"
+        ]
+    };
+    return [...(byRole[role.key] ?? []), ...common];
+}
 function roleSkillSpec(role) {
     const label = role.label;
     return {
@@ -208,6 +241,28 @@ function roleSkillSpec(role) {
             "",
             role.shortDescription,
             "",
+            "## Must-Ask Questions",
+            "",
+            ...mustAskQuestionsForRole(role).map((question) => `- ${question}`),
+            "",
+            "## Stop Conditions",
+            "",
+            "- Stop before closure when the role's recommendation would change a research question, construct definition, measurement rule, authorship boundary, or venue positioning.",
+            "- Stop when the role is relying on unstated evidence, a tacit assumption, or a hidden tradeoff.",
+            "- Stop when another LongTable role would likely disagree and the disagreement has not been shown to the researcher.",
+            "",
+            "## Output Contract",
+            "",
+            "- Start with the role's strongest concern or contribution.",
+            "- State one concrete question the researcher should answer if the direction is not yet safe to settle.",
+            "- Separate evidence needs from interpretation and from role-specific judgment.",
+            "",
+            "## Anti-Patterns",
+            "",
+            "- Do not give generic encouragement or a polished synthesis without the role's actual objection.",
+            "- Do not use the role as a decorative label after a normal answer has already been written.",
+            "- Do not ask for evidence only as a fallback; name the missing evidence when it changes the recommendation.",
+            "",
             "## Rules",
             "",
             `- Disclose: \`LongTable consulted: ${label}\`.`,

package/package.json

@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
 {
   "name": "@longtable/provider-claude",
-  "version": "0.1.35",
+  "version": "0.1.37",
   "private": false,
   "description": "Claude adapter surface for LongTable",
   "type": "module",
@@ -21,9 +21,9 @@
     "typecheck": "tsc -p tsconfig.json --noEmit"
   },
   "dependencies": {
-    "@longtable/checkpoints": "0.1.35",
-    "@longtable/core": "0.1.35",
-    "@longtable/setup": "0.1.35"
+    "@longtable/checkpoints": "0.1.37",
+    "@longtable/core": "0.1.37",
+    "@longtable/setup": "0.1.37"
   },
   "devDependencies": {
     "typescript": "^5.6.0"