@longtable/cli 0.1.45 → 0.1.48

package/dist/project-session.js

@@ -163,7 +163,103 @@ function renderResearchSpecificationSummary(specification, locale) {
     }
     return lines;
 }
-function buildCurrentGuide(project, session, recentInvocations = [], pendingQuestions = [], pendingObligations = []) {
+function renderResearchSpecificationStatus(session, locale) {
+    if (!session.firstResearchShape && !session.researchSpecification) {
+        return [];
+    }
+    const korean = locale === "ko";
+    if (!session.researchSpecification) {
+        return [
+            "",
+            korean ? "## Research Specification 상태" : "## Research Specification Status",
+            korean
+                ? "- 상태: First Research Shape는 있지만 Research Specification은 아직 없습니다."
+                : "- Status: First Research Shape exists, but Research Specification is missing.",
+            korean
+                ? "- 의미: First Research Shape는 짧은 핸들/재개 인덱스이며, 인터뷰 종료나 연구 명세 확정이 아닙니다."
+                : "- Meaning: First Research Shape is a short handle/resume index, not interview closure or a confirmed research specification.",
+            korean
+                ? "- 다음 프로토콜: 충분한 내용이 있으면 `summarize_research_specification`으로 preview를 만들고 `confirm_research_specification`으로 저장/한 질문 더/섹션 수정/열어두기를 확인합니다."
+                : "- Next protocol: when enough detail exists, run `summarize_research_specification` to create the preview, then `confirm_research_specification` to confirm, ask one more question, revise a section, or keep it open."
+        ];
+    }
+    const status = session.researchSpecification.confirmedAt
+        ? "confirmed"
+        : session.researchSpecification.status ?? "draft";
+    if (status === "confirmed") {
+        return [];
+    }
+    return [
+        "",
+        korean ? "## Research Specification 상태" : "## Research Specification Status",
+        korean
+            ? `- 상태: ${status}. Research Specification은 저장되어 있지만 아직 확정된 종료 지점이 아닙니다.`
+            : `- Status: ${status}. Research Specification exists, but it is not a confirmed closure point yet.`,
+        korean
+            ? "- 다음 프로토콜: 명세를 업데이트한 뒤 `confirm_research_specification`으로 다시 preview 확인을 받아야 합니다."
+            : "- Next protocol: update the specification, then return to `confirm_research_specification` for another preview confirmation."
+    ];
+}
+function renderResearchSpecificationAudit(state, locale) {
+    const korean = locale === "ko";
+    const revisions = (state.specRevisions ?? []).slice(-5).reverse();
+    const patches = (state.specPatches ?? []).slice(-5).reverse();
+    const evidenceRecords = state.evidenceRecords ?? [];
+    const unincorporated = evidenceRecords
+        .filter((record) => !record.incorporatedByRevisionId)
+        .slice(-5)
+        .reverse();
+    const specification = state.researchSpecification;
+    const sectionEvidence = Object.entries(specification?.sectionEvidence ?? {}).slice(0, 8);
+    if (revisions.length === 0 &&
+        patches.length === 0 &&
+        evidenceRecords.length === 0 &&
+        sectionEvidence.length === 0) {
+        return [];
+    }
+    return [
+        "",
+        korean ? "## Research Specification 감사" : "## Research Specification Audit",
+        ...(specification
+            ? [
+                `- ${korean ? "현재 버전" : "Current revision"}: ${specification.latestRevisionId ?? "unversioned"}`,
+                `- ${korean ? "상태" : "Status"}: ${specification.confirmedAt ? "confirmed" : specification.status ?? "draft"}`
+            ]
+            : []),
+        `- ${korean ? "원문 인터뷰 turn" : "Raw interview turns"}: ${(state.interviewTurns ?? []).length}`,
+        `- ${korean ? "근거 기록" : "Evidence records"}: ${evidenceRecords.length}`,
+        `- ${korean ? "spec patch" : "Spec patches"}: ${(state.specPatches ?? []).length}`,
+        `- ${korean ? "spec revision" : "Spec revisions"}: ${(state.specRevisions ?? []).length}`,
+        ...(revisions.length > 0
+            ? [
+                "",
+                korean ? "### 최근 명세 변경" : "### Recent Specification Changes",
+                ...revisions.map((revision) => `- v${revision.index} ${revision.title}: ${revision.changeSummary.slice(0, 3).join("; ")}`)
+            ]
+            : []),
+        ...(sectionEvidence.length > 0
+            ? [
+                "",
+                korean ? "### 근거 맵" : "### Evidence Map",
+                ...sectionEvidence.map(([path, ids]) => `- ${path}: ${ids.slice(-4).join(", ")}`)
+            ]
+            : []),
+        ...(unincorporated.length > 0
+            ? [
+                "",
+                korean ? "### 아직 반영되지 않은 근거" : "### Unincorporated Evidence",
+                ...unincorporated.map((record) => `- ${record.id} [${record.sourceKind}]: ${compactLine(record.summary, 120)}`)
+            ]
+            : []),
+        ...(patches.some((patch) => patch.status === "proposed")
+            ? [
+                "",
+                korean ? "- 대기 중인 spec patch가 있습니다. 적용하거나 거절해야 합니다." : "- Proposed spec patches are waiting to be applied or rejected."
+            ]
+            : [])
+    ];
+}
+function buildCurrentGuide(project, session, recentInvocations = [], pendingQuestions = [], pendingObligations = [], state = createEmptyResearchState()) {
     const locale = normalizeLocale(session.locale ?? project.locale);
     const openQuestions = session.openQuestions && session.openQuestions.length > 0
         ? session.openQuestions
@@ -191,6 +287,8 @@ function buildCurrentGuide(project, session, recentInvocations = [], pendingQues
             `- 다음 액션: ${nextAction}`,
             `- 관점: ${session.requestedPerspectives.length > 0 ? session.requestedPerspectives.join(", ") : "auto"}`,
             `- disagreement: ${session.disagreementPreference}`,
+            ...renderResearchSpecificationStatus(session, locale),
+            ...renderResearchSpecificationAudit(state, locale),
             "",
             "## 열린 질문",
             ...openQuestions.map((question) => `- ${question}`),
@@ -210,7 +308,7 @@ function buildCurrentGuide(project, session, recentInvocations = [], pendingQues
                     "## 대기 중인 결정 질문",
                     ...pendingQuestions.map((record) => {
                         const options = formatQuestionOptionValues(record).join("/");
-                        return `- ${record.id}: ${record.prompt.question} (${options})`;
+                        return `- ${record.id}: ${record.prompt.question}${formatQuestionMetadata(record)} (${options})`;
                     }),
                     "- 답변 기록: `longtable decide --question <id> --answer <value>`"
                 ]
@@ -266,6 +364,8 @@ function buildCurrentGuide(project, session, recentInvocations = [], pendingQues
         `- Next action: ${nextAction}`,
         `- Perspectives: ${session.requestedPerspectives.length > 0 ? session.requestedPerspectives.join(", ") : "auto"}`,
         `- Disagreement: ${session.disagreementPreference}`,
+        ...renderResearchSpecificationStatus(session, locale),
+        ...renderResearchSpecificationAudit(state, locale),
         "",
         "## Open Questions",
         ...openQuestions.map((question) => `- ${question}`),
@@ -285,7 +385,7 @@ function buildCurrentGuide(project, session, recentInvocations = [], pendingQues
                 "## Pending Decision Questions",
                 ...pendingQuestions.map((record) => {
                     const options = formatQuestionOptionValues(record).join("/");
-                    return `- ${record.id}: ${record.prompt.question} (${options})`;
+                    return `- ${record.id}: ${record.prompt.question}${formatQuestionMetadata(record)} (${options})`;
                 }),
                 "- Record an answer: `longtable decide --question <id> --answer <value>`"
             ]
@@ -334,6 +434,10 @@ async function loadResearchState(stateFilePath) {
         hooks: parsed.hooks ?? [],
         ...(parsed.firstResearchShape ? { firstResearchShape: parsed.firstResearchShape } : {}),
         ...(parsed.researchSpecification ? { researchSpecification: parsed.researchSpecification } : {}),
+        interviewTurns: parsed.interviewTurns ?? [],
+        evidenceRecords: parsed.evidenceRecords ?? [],
+        specPatches: parsed.specPatches ?? [],
+        specRevisions: parsed.specRevisions ?? [],
         questionObligations: parsed.questionObligations ?? [],
         inferredHypotheses: parsed.inferredHypotheses ?? [],
         openTensions: parsed.openTensions ?? [],
@@ -375,6 +479,287 @@ function formatQuestionOptionValues(record) {
     }
     return values;
 }
+function formatQuestionMetadata(record) {
+    const parts = [
+        record.commitmentFamily ? `commitment: ${record.commitmentFamily}` : "",
+        record.epistemicBasis ? `basis: ${record.epistemicBasis}` : ""
+    ].filter(Boolean);
+    return parts.length > 0 ? ` [${parts.join("; ")}]` : "";
+}
+function compactLine(value, limit = 160) {
+    const compacted = value.replace(/\s+/g, " ").trim();
+    return compacted.length > limit ? `${compacted.slice(0, limit - 1)}…` : compacted;
+}
+function asRecord(value) {
+    return value !== null && typeof value === "object" && !Array.isArray(value)
+        ? value
+        : null;
+}
+const SPEC_DIFF_IGNORED_PATHS = new Set([
+    "createdAt",
+    "updatedAt",
+    "latestRevisionId",
+    "sourceEvidenceIds",
+    "sectionEvidence"
+]);
+function flattenSpecificationValue(value, prefix = "") {
+    const flattened = new Map();
+    const record = asRecord(value);
+    if (!record) {
+        if (prefix) {
+            flattened.set(prefix, value);
+        }
+        return flattened;
+    }
+    for (const [key, nested] of Object.entries(record)) {
+        const path = prefix ? `${prefix}.${key}` : key;
+        if (SPEC_DIFF_IGNORED_PATHS.has(path)) {
+            continue;
+        }
+        const nestedRecord = asRecord(nested);
+        if (nestedRecord) {
+            for (const [nestedPath, nestedValue] of flattenSpecificationValue(nestedRecord, path)) {
+                flattened.set(nestedPath, nestedValue);
+            }
+            continue;
+        }
+        flattened.set(path, nested);
+    }
+    return flattened;
+}
+function stableValue(value) {
+    return JSON.stringify(value ?? null);
+}
+export function diffResearchSpecifications(before, after) {
+    const beforeMap = before ? flattenSpecificationValue(before) : new Map();
+    const afterMap = flattenSpecificationValue(after);
+    const paths = new Set([...beforeMap.keys(), ...afterMap.keys()]);
+    const changes = [];
+    for (const path of [...paths].sort()) {
+        const previous = beforeMap.get(path);
+        const next = afterMap.get(path);
+        if (stableValue(previous) === stableValue(next)) {
+            continue;
+        }
+        const kind = previous === undefined
+            ? "set"
+            : next === undefined
+                ? "remove"
+                : "replace";
+        changes.push({
+            path,
+            kind,
+            summary: `${kind} ${path}`,
+            ...(previous !== undefined ? { before: previous } : {}),
+            ...(next !== undefined ? { after: next } : {})
+        });
+    }
+    return changes;
+}
+function cloneResearchSpecification(specification) {
+    return JSON.parse(JSON.stringify(specification));
+}
+function mergeStringLists(...lists) {
+    return [...new Set(lists.flatMap((list) => list ?? []).filter(Boolean))];
+}
+function requiredResearchSpecificationGaps(specification) {
+    const gaps = [];
+    if (!specification.researchDirection.question?.trim()) {
+        gaps.push("research question");
+    }
+    if (specification.constructOntology.coreConstructs.length === 0) {
+        gaps.push("construct map/core constructs");
+    }
+    if (specification.researchDirection.inclusionCriteria?.length === 0 &&
+        specification.researchDirection.exclusionCriteria?.length === 0) {
+        gaps.push("inclusion/exclusion rule");
+    }
+    if (specification.evidenceAccess.requiredSources?.length === 0 &&
+        specification.evidenceAccess.evidenceStandards?.length === 0) {
+        gaps.push("evidence boundary");
+    }
+    if (!specification.methodAnalysis.design?.trim() &&
+        specification.methodAnalysis.analysisOptions.length === 0) {
+        gaps.push("method commitment");
+    }
+    if (specification.openQuestions.length === 0 && specification.protectedDecisions.length === 0) {
+        gaps.push("unresolved decisions/protected decisions");
+    }
+    if (specification.evidenceAccess.accessRequirements?.length === 0 &&
+        specification.evidenceAccess.requiredSources?.length === 0) {
+        gaps.push("search/access assumptions");
+    }
+    return gaps;
+}
+function buildResearchSpecificationGapQuestion(gaps, timestamp, sourceEvidenceIds) {
+    return {
+        id: createId("question"),
+        createdAt: timestamp,
+        updatedAt: timestamp,
+        status: "pending",
+        commitmentFamily: "scope",
+        epistemicBasis: "project_state",
+        prompt: {
+            id: createId("prompt"),
+            checkpointKey: "research_specification_required_sections",
+            title: "Research Specification gaps",
+            question: `Which missing Research Specification section should LongTable resolve first? Missing: ${gaps.join(", ")}.`,
+            type: "single_choice",
+            options: [
+                { value: "ask_researcher", label: "Ask the researcher", description: "Pause and ask for the missing research commitment.", recommended: true },
+                { value: "mark_unresolved", label: "Mark unresolved", description: "Keep the gap visible as an unresolved decision." },
+                { value: "infer_from_evidence", label: "Infer from evidence", description: "Use existing evidence records and keep the inference explicit." },
+                { value: "defer", label: "Defer", description: "Do not treat the specification as complete yet." }
+            ],
+            allowOther: true,
+            otherLabel: "Other resolution",
+            required: true,
+            source: "checkpoint",
+            displayReason: `The current Research Specification is missing: ${gaps.join(", ")}.`,
+            rationale: [
+                "Research Specification is the required durable interview artifact.",
+                "Missing required sections can make later resume, screening, coding, or evidence decisions stale."
+            ],
+            preferredSurfaces: ["mcp_elicitation", "numbered"]
+        },
+        transportStatus: {
+            surface: "mcp_elicitation",
+            status: "not_attempted",
+            updatedAt: timestamp,
+            ...(sourceEvidenceIds.length > 0 ? { message: `Source evidence: ${sourceEvidenceIds.join(", ")}` } : {})
+        }
+    };
+}
+function appendSpecGapQuestionIfNeeded(state, specification, timestamp, sourceEvidenceIds) {
+    const gaps = requiredResearchSpecificationGaps(specification);
+    if (gaps.length === 0) {
+        return state;
+    }
+    const alreadyPending = (state.questionLog ?? []).some((record) => record.status === "pending" &&
+        record.prompt.checkpointKey === "research_specification_required_sections");
+    if (alreadyPending) {
+        return state;
+    }
+    return {
+        ...state,
+        questionLog: [
+            ...(state.questionLog ?? []),
+            buildResearchSpecificationGapQuestion(gaps, timestamp, sourceEvidenceIds)
+        ]
+    };
+}
+function changeSummaryForRevision(changes) {
+    if (changes.length === 0) {
+        return ["No substantive field changes; audit metadata refreshed."];
+    }
+    return changes.slice(0, 12).map((change) => change.summary);
+}
+export function applyResearchSpecificationAuditUpdate(state, options) {
+    const previous = state.researchSpecification;
+    const incomingEvidenceIds = mergeStringLists(options.patch?.sourceEvidenceIds, options.specification.sourceEvidenceIds, options.sourceEvidenceIds);
+    const sourceEvidenceIds = mergeStringLists(previous?.sourceEvidenceIds, incomingEvidenceIds);
+    const changes = diffResearchSpecifications(previous, options.specification)
+        .map((change) => ({
+        ...change,
+        ...(incomingEvidenceIds.length > 0 ? { evidenceRecordIds: incomingEvidenceIds } : {})
+    }));
+    const patchId = options.patch?.id ?? createId("spec_patch");
+    const revisionId = createId("spec_revision");
+    const patchTitle = options.title ?? options.patch?.title ?? `Research Specification update: ${options.specification.title}`;
+    const patchRationale = options.rationale ?? options.patch?.rationale;
+    const sectionEvidence = {
+        ...(previous?.sectionEvidence ?? {}),
+        ...(options.specification.sectionEvidence ?? {})
+    };
+    for (const change of changes) {
+        const fieldEvidenceIds = change.evidenceRecordIds ?? [];
+        if (fieldEvidenceIds.length > 0) {
+            sectionEvidence[change.path] = mergeStringLists(sectionEvidence[change.path], fieldEvidenceIds);
+        }
+    }
+    const specification = {
+        ...cloneResearchSpecification(options.specification),
+        updatedAt: options.timestamp,
+        latestRevisionId: revisionId,
+        sourceEvidenceIds,
+        sectionEvidence
+    };
+    const decision = options.decisionRecordId || options.createDecisionRecord === false
+        ? undefined
+        : {
+            id: createId("decision"),
+            timestamp: options.timestamp,
+            checkpointKey: "research_specification_auto_update",
+            level: "log_only",
+            mode: "commit",
+            summary: `Applied Research Specification update: ${patchTitle}`,
+            commitmentFamily: "scope",
+            epistemicBasis: "mixed",
+            rationale: patchRationale ?? "Automatically applied a source-mapped Research Specification update."
+        };
+    const decisionRecordId = options.decisionRecordId ?? decision?.id;
+    const revision = {
+        id: revisionId,
+        index: (state.specRevisions ?? []).length + 1,
+        createdAt: options.timestamp,
+        source: options.source,
+        title: patchTitle,
+        status: specification.status ?? "draft",
+        patchId,
+        ...(options.questionRecordId ? { questionRecordId: options.questionRecordId } : {}),
+        ...(decisionRecordId ? { decisionRecordId } : {}),
+        sourceEvidenceIds,
+        changeSummary: changeSummaryForRevision(changes),
+        specification
+    };
+    const patch = {
+        id: patchId,
+        createdAt: options.patch?.createdAt ?? options.timestamp,
+        updatedAt: options.timestamp,
+        status: "applied",
+        source: options.source,
+        title: patchTitle,
+        ...(patchRationale ? { rationale: patchRationale } : {}),
+        changes,
+        sourceEvidenceIds,
+        targetSpecification: specification,
+        appliedAt: options.timestamp,
+        appliedRevisionId: revision.id,
+        ...(options.questionRecordId ? { questionRecordId: options.questionRecordId } : {}),
+        ...(decisionRecordId ? { decisionRecordId } : {})
+    };
+    const incorporatedEvidence = (state.evidenceRecords ?? []).map((record) => sourceEvidenceIds.includes(record.id)
+        ? {
+            ...record,
+            incorporatedAt: options.timestamp,
+            incorporatedByPatchId: patch.id,
+            incorporatedByRevisionId: revision.id
+        }
+        : record);
+    const withDecision = decision ? appendDecisionToResearchState(state, decision) : state;
+    const previousPatches = withDecision.specPatches ?? [];
+    const specPatches = previousPatches.some((entry) => entry.id === patch.id)
+        ? previousPatches.map((entry) => entry.id === patch.id ? patch : entry)
+        : [...previousPatches, patch];
+    const nextState = {
+        ...withDecision,
+        researchSpecification: specification,
+        evidenceRecords: incorporatedEvidence,
+        specPatches,
+        specRevisions: [...(withDecision.specRevisions ?? []), revision],
+        workingState: {
+            ...withDecision.workingState,
+            researchSpecification: specification
+        }
+    };
+    return {
+        state: appendSpecGapQuestionIfNeeded(nextState, specification, options.timestamp, sourceEvidenceIds),
+        specification,
+        patch,
+        revision,
+        ...(decision ? { decision } : {})
+    };
+}
 function summarizeWorkspaceInspection(context, state) {
     const questions = state.questionLog ?? [];
     const pendingQuestions = questions.filter((record) => record.status === "pending");
@@ -419,7 +804,11 @@ function summarizeWorkspaceInspection(context, state) {
             pendingQuestions: pendingQuestions.length,
             pendingObligations: pendingObligations.length,
             answeredQuestions: answeredQuestions.length,
-            decisions: (state.decisionLog ?? []).length
+            decisions: (state.decisionLog ?? []).length,
+            interviewTurns: (state.interviewTurns ?? []).length,
+            evidenceRecords: (state.evidenceRecords ?? []).length,
+            specPatches: (state.specPatches ?? []).length,
+            specRevisions: (state.specRevisions ?? []).length
         },
         recentInvocations: recentInvocationRecords(state, 5).map((record) => ({
             id: record.id,
@@ -435,6 +824,8 @@ function summarizeWorkspaceInspection(context, state) {
             id: record.id,
             title: record.prompt.title,
             question: record.prompt.question,
+            ...(record.commitmentFamily ? { commitmentFamily: record.commitmentFamily } : {}),
+            ...(record.epistemicBasis ? { epistemicBasis: record.epistemicBasis } : {}),
             options: formatQuestionOptionValues(record),
             required: record.prompt.required
         })),
@@ -449,6 +840,8 @@ function summarizeWorkspaceInspection(context, state) {
             id: record.id,
             checkpointKey: record.checkpointKey,
             summary: record.summary,
+            ...(record.commitmentFamily ? { commitmentFamily: record.commitmentFamily } : {}),
+            ...(record.epistemicBasis ? { epistemicBasis: record.epistemicBasis } : {}),
             ...(record.selectedOption ? { selectedOption: record.selectedOption } : {}),
             timestamp: record.timestamp
         })),
@@ -495,9 +888,12 @@ function buildProjectAgentsMd(project, session) {
         "- Begin exploratory work with clarifying or tension questions before recommending a direction.",
         "- For `$longtable-interview`, ask one natural-language question at a time, reflect with `LongTable hears: ...`, record turns when MCP is available, and avoid early reader/reviewer or theory/method/measurement classification.",
         "- Do not summarize `$longtable-interview` because a fixed number of turns has passed; wait for content-based readiness around research object, focal uncertainty, boundary, evidence/material, protected decision, and next action.",
+        "- First Research Shape is a short handle/resume index, not the default closure point.",
         "- After the First Research Shape, create a Research Specification when the interview has enough detail to preserve scope, construct ontology, theory framing, coding rules, method options, evidence/access requirements, epistemic alignment, protected decisions, open questions, and next actions.",
+        "- If a confirmed First Research Shape exists without a Research Specification, continue directly into the next Research Specification question instead of asking shape-level continue/revise/restart questions.",
+        "- If the researcher chooses `ask_one_more` or `revise_section` at Research Specification confirmation, answer that gap and return to the Research Specification Preview before ending the interview.",
         "- Do not let unrelated pending Researcher Checkpoints interrupt `$longtable-interview`; mention them only as separate unresolved checkpoints unless the researcher is confirming, saving, or recording a research decision.",
-        "- Use structured options only at the final First Research Shape confirmation or at true checkpoint boundaries.",
+        "- Use structured options at the final Research Specification confirmation, at explicit short-handle stop points, or at true checkpoint boundaries.",
         "- If you foreground role perspectives, disclose them with `LongTable consulted: ...`.",
         "- Keep one accountable synthesis, but do not hide meaningful disagreement.",
         ...(session.disagreementPreference === "always_visible"
@@ -631,19 +1027,92 @@ export async function syncCurrentWorkspaceView(context) {
             ? { researchSpecification: context.session.researchSpecification ?? state.researchSpecification }
             : {})
     };
-    const body = buildCurrentGuide(context.project, session, recentInvocationRecords(state), recentPendingQuestions(state), recentPendingObligations(state));
+    const body = buildCurrentGuide(context.project, session, recentInvocationRecords(state), recentPendingQuestions(state), recentPendingObligations(state), state);
     await writeFile(context.currentFilePath, body, "utf8");
     return context.currentFilePath;
 }
+function evidenceKindForInvocationRole(role) {
+    const normalized = role?.toLowerCase() ?? "";
+    if (normalized.includes("critic")) {
+        return "critic";
+    }
+    if (normalized.includes("reviewer") || normalized.includes("review")) {
+        return "reviewer";
+    }
+    return "panel";
+}
+function evidenceRecordsForInvocation(invocation, timestamp) {
+    const records = [];
+    if (invocation.panelResult) {
+        for (const member of invocation.panelResult.memberResults) {
+            if (!member.summary && (member.claims ?? []).length === 0 && (member.objections ?? []).length === 0) {
+                continue;
+            }
+            records.push({
+                id: createId("evidence"),
+                createdAt: timestamp,
+                sourceKind: evidenceKindForInvocationRole(member.role),
+                sourceId: `${invocation.id}:${member.role}`,
+                role: member.role,
+                summary: compactLine(member.summary ?? [...(member.claims ?? []), ...(member.objections ?? [])].join(" ")),
+                rawText: [
+                    member.summary ? `Summary: ${member.summary}` : "",
+                    member.claims?.length ? `Claims: ${member.claims.join("; ")}` : "",
+                    member.objections?.length ? `Objections: ${member.objections.join("; ")}` : "",
+                    member.openQuestions?.length ? `Open questions: ${member.openQuestions.join("; ")}` : ""
+                ].filter(Boolean).join("\n"),
+                linkedInvocationRecordIds: [invocation.id],
+                linkedQuestionRecordIds: invocation.panelResult.linkedQuestionRecordIds,
+                linkedDecisionRecordIds: invocation.panelResult.linkedDecisionRecordIds
+            });
+        }
+        if (invocation.panelResult.synthesis || invocation.panelResult.conflictSummary) {
+            records.push({
+                id: createId("evidence"),
+                createdAt: timestamp,
+                sourceKind: "panel",
+                sourceId: invocation.panelResult.id,
+                summary: compactLine(invocation.panelResult.synthesis ?? invocation.panelResult.conflictSummary ?? "Panel result"),
+                rawText: [
+                    invocation.panelResult.synthesis ? `Synthesis: ${invocation.panelResult.synthesis}` : "",
+                    invocation.panelResult.conflictSummary ? `Conflict: ${invocation.panelResult.conflictSummary}` : ""
+                ].filter(Boolean).join("\n"),
+                linkedInvocationRecordIds: [invocation.id],
+                linkedQuestionRecordIds: invocation.panelResult.linkedQuestionRecordIds,
+                linkedDecisionRecordIds: invocation.panelResult.linkedDecisionRecordIds
+            });
+        }
+        return records;
+    }
+    if (invocation.status === "completed" && invocation.intent.prompt.trim()) {
+        records.push({
+            id: createId("evidence"),
+            createdAt: timestamp,
+            sourceKind: "invocation",
+            sourceId: invocation.id,
+            summary: compactLine(`${invocation.intent.kind}/${invocation.intent.mode}: ${invocation.intent.prompt}`),
+            rawText: invocation.intent.prompt,
+            linkedInvocationRecordIds: [invocation.id]
+        });
+    }
+    return records;
+}
 export async function appendInvocationRecordToWorkspace(context, invocation, questions = []) {
     const state = await loadResearchState(context.stateFilePath);
     const withInvocation = appendInvocationToResearchState(state, invocation);
     const updated = questions.length > 0
         ? appendQuestionRecords(withInvocation, questions)
         : withInvocation;
-    await writeFile(context.stateFilePath, JSON.stringify(updated, null, 2), "utf8");
+    const evidenceRecords = evidenceRecordsForInvocation(invocation, nowIso());
+    const withEvidence = evidenceRecords.length > 0
+        ? {
+            ...updated,
+            evidenceRecords: [...(updated.evidenceRecords ?? []), ...evidenceRecords]
+        }
+        : updated;
+    await writeFile(context.stateFilePath, JSON.stringify(withEvidence, null, 2), "utf8");
     await syncCurrentWorkspaceView(context);
-    return updated;
+    return withEvidence;
 }
 function createId(prefix) {
     return `${prefix}_${Date.now().toString(36)}_${Math.random().toString(36).slice(2, 8)}`;
@@ -789,7 +1258,24 @@ export async function appendLongTableInterviewTurn(options) {
                 : [])
         ]
     };
-    const updated = upsertHook(state, hook);
+    const evidence = {
+        id: createId("evidence"),
+        createdAt: timestamp,
+        sourceKind: "interview_turn",
+        sourceId: turn.id,
+        sourceHookId: existing.id,
+        summary: compactLine(`Interview turn ${turn.index}: ${turn.answer}`),
+        rawText: [
+            `Question: ${turn.question}`,
+            `Answer: ${turn.answer}`,
+            turn.reflection ? `Reflection: ${turn.reflection}` : ""
+        ].filter(Boolean).join("\n")
+    };
+    const updated = {
+        ...upsertHook(state, hook),
+        interviewTurns: [...(state.interviewTurns ?? []), turn],
+        evidenceRecords: [...(state.evidenceRecords ?? []), evidence]
+    };
     await writeFile(options.context.stateFilePath, JSON.stringify(updated, null, 2), "utf8");
     await syncCurrentWorkspaceView(options.context);
     return { hook, turn, state: updated };
@@ -956,12 +1442,18 @@ export async function summarizeLongTableResearchSpecification(options) {
         resumeHint: `I want to continue from the Research Specification: ${specification.title}.`
     };
     options.context.session = session;
-    let updated = hook ? upsertHook(state, hook) : state;
-    updated.researchSpecification = specification;
-    updated.workingState = {
-        ...updated.workingState,
-        researchSpecification: specification
-    };
+    const sourceEvidenceIds = (state.evidenceRecords ?? [])
+        .filter((record) => record.sourceHookId && record.sourceHookId === (existing?.id ?? sourceHookId))
+        .map((record) => record.id);
+    const audited = applyResearchSpecificationAuditUpdate(hook ? upsertHook(state, hook) : state, {
+        specification,
+        timestamp,
+        source: "interview",
+        title: `Research Specification draft: ${specification.title}`,
+        rationale: "Stored or refreshed the required Research Specification from LongTable interview evidence.",
+        sourceEvidenceIds
+    });
+    let updated = audited.state;
     updated.narrativeTraces.push({
         id: createId("narrative_trace"),
         timestamp,
@@ -976,6 +1468,93 @@ export async function summarizeLongTableResearchSpecification(options) {
     await syncCurrentWorkspaceView(options.context);
     return { hook, specification, state: updated, session };
 }
+export async function proposeResearchSpecificationPatch(options) {
+    const state = await loadResearchState(options.context.stateFilePath);
+    const timestamp = nowIso();
+    const specification = normalizeResearchSpecification(options.specification, options.specification.sourceHookId ?? state.researchSpecification?.sourceHookId, timestamp);
+    const sourceEvidenceIds = mergeStringLists(options.specification.sourceEvidenceIds, specification.sourceEvidenceIds, options.sourceEvidenceIds);
+    const changes = diffResearchSpecifications(state.researchSpecification, specification)
+        .map((change) => ({
+        ...change,
+        evidenceRecordIds: sourceEvidenceIds
+    }));
+    const patch = {
+        id: createId("spec_patch"),
+        createdAt: timestamp,
+        updatedAt: timestamp,
+        status: "proposed",
+        source: options.source ?? "manual",
+        title: `Proposed Research Specification update: ${specification.title}`,
+        ...(options.rationale ? { rationale: options.rationale } : {}),
+        changes,
+        sourceEvidenceIds,
+        targetSpecification: specification
+    };
+    const updated = {
+        ...state,
+        specPatches: [...(state.specPatches ?? []), patch]
+    };
+    await writeFile(options.context.stateFilePath, JSON.stringify(updated, null, 2), "utf8");
+    await syncCurrentWorkspaceView(options.context);
+    return { patch, changes, state: updated };
+}
+export async function applyResearchSpecificationPatch(options) {
+    const state = await loadResearchState(options.context.stateFilePath);
+    const timestamp = nowIso();
+    const storedPatch = options.patchId
+        ? (state.specPatches ?? []).find((patch) => patch.id === options.patchId)
+        : undefined;
+    if (options.patchId && !storedPatch) {
+        throw new Error(`No Research Specification patch found for ${options.patchId}.`);
+    }
+    const inputSpecification = options.specification ?? storedPatch?.targetSpecification;
+    if (!inputSpecification) {
+        throw new Error(options.patchId ? `No target Research Specification found for patch ${options.patchId}.` : "Research Specification is required when no patchId is supplied.");
+    }
+    const specification = normalizeResearchSpecification(inputSpecification, inputSpecification.sourceHookId ?? state.researchSpecification?.sourceHookId, timestamp);
+    const audited = applyResearchSpecificationAuditUpdate(state, {
+        specification,
+        timestamp,
+        source: options.source ?? storedPatch?.source ?? "manual",
+        title: storedPatch?.title ?? `Applied Research Specification update: ${specification.title}`,
+        rationale: options.rationale ?? storedPatch?.rationale,
+        sourceEvidenceIds: mergeStringLists(storedPatch?.sourceEvidenceIds, options.sourceEvidenceIds),
+        patch: storedPatch,
+        questionRecordId: options.questionRecordId ?? storedPatch?.questionRecordId,
+        decisionRecordId: options.decisionRecordId ?? storedPatch?.decisionRecordId
+    });
+    const session = {
+        ...options.context.session,
+        researchSpecification: audited.specification,
+        lastUpdatedAt: timestamp,
+        resumeHint: `I want to continue from the Research Specification: ${audited.specification.title}.`
+    };
+    options.context.session = session;
+    await writeFile(options.context.sessionFilePath, JSON.stringify(session, null, 2), "utf8");
+    await writeFile(options.context.stateFilePath, JSON.stringify(audited.state, null, 2), "utf8");
+    await syncCurrentWorkspaceView(options.context);
+    return {
+        patch: audited.patch,
+        revision: audited.revision,
+        specification: audited.specification,
+        state: audited.state,
+        session,
+        ...(audited.decision ? { decision: audited.decision } : {})
+    };
+}
+export async function readResearchSpecificationHistory(context) {
+    const state = await loadResearchState(context.stateFilePath);
+    return {
+        ...(state.researchSpecification ? { specification: state.researchSpecification } : {}),
+        revisions: state.specRevisions ?? [],
+        patches: state.specPatches ?? [],
+        evidenceRecords: state.evidenceRecords ?? []
+    };
+}
+export async function findUnincorporatedResearchEvidence(context) {
+    const state = await loadResearchState(context.stateFilePath);
+    return (state.evidenceRecords ?? []).filter((record) => !record.incorporatedByRevisionId);
+}
 function findQuestionForDecision(state, questionId) {
     const pending = (state.questionLog ?? []).filter((record) => record.status === "pending");
     if (questionId) {
@@ -1668,6 +2247,70 @@ export function generateQuestionOpportunities(prompt, options = {}) {
     };
 }
 const FOLLOW_UP_PROMPT_PREFIX = "Follow-up prompt:";
+function compactMetadataText(parts) {
+    return parts
+        .flatMap((part) => Array.isArray(part) ? part : [part])
+        .filter((part) => Boolean(part && part.trim()))
+        .join(" ")
+        .replace(/\s+/g, " ")
+        .trim()
+        .toLowerCase();
+}
+function textMatchesAny(text, patterns) {
+    return patterns.some((pattern) => pattern.test(text));
+}
+const COMMITMENT_FAMILY_BY_CHECKPOINT = [
+    [/product|meta_decision/, "product_policy"],
+    [/research_question|research_direction|scope|boundary|inclusion|exclusion/, "scope"],
+    [/theory|construct|conceptual/, "construct"],
+    [/measurement|coding|codebook|extraction/, "coding"],
+    [/method|analysis|panel_disagreement|team_debate|review/, "method"],
+    [/evidence|scholarly_access|source_authority/, "evidence"],
+    [/knowledge_gap|tacit_assumption|epistemic/, "epistemic_authority"]
+];
+function inferCommitmentFamily(input) {
+    const checkpointKey = (input.checkpointKey ?? "").toLowerCase();
+    const matched = COMMITMENT_FAMILY_BY_CHECKPOINT.find(([pattern]) => pattern.test(checkpointKey));
+    if (matched)
+        return matched[1];
+    if (input.triggerFamily === "meta_decision")
+        return "product_policy";
+    if (input.triggerFamily === "evidence")
+        return "evidence";
+    const text = compactMetadataText([input.title, input.question, input.prompt, input.rationale]);
+    if (textMatchesAny(text, [/checkpoint policy/, /hook ux/, /product language/, /\breadme\b/, /제품 언어|체크포인트 정책|훅|리드미/])) {
+        return "product_policy";
+    }
+    return undefined;
+}
+function inferEpistemicBasis(input) {
+    const text = compactMetadataText([input.title, input.question, input.prompt, input.rationale]);
+    const bases = [];
+    if (textMatchesAny(text, [/\bresearcher\b/, /\bhuman\b/, /\byour judgment\b/, /\byour knowledge\b/, /연구자|인간|사람|너의\s*판단|당신의\s*판단|내\s*지식|사용자/])) {
+        bases.push("researcher_knowledge");
+    }
+    if (textMatchesAny(text, [/\bproject state\b/, /\bworkspace\b/, /\bcurrent\.md\b/, /\.longtable\b/, /\bstate\.json\b/, /\bdataset\b/, /\bcodebook\b/, /\bcoding sheet\b/, /프로젝트\s*상태|워크스페이스|데이터셋|코드북|코딩\s*시트/])) {
+        bases.push("project_state");
+    }
+    if (textMatchesAny(text, [/\bexternal evidence\b/, /\bliterature\b/, /\bpaper\b/, /\bpdf\b/, /\bsource\b/, /\bcitation\b/, /\breference\b/, /\bfull[- ]?text\b/, /외부\s*근거|문헌|논문|원문|전문|출처|인용|레퍼런스/])) {
+        bases.push("external_evidence");
+    }
+    if (textMatchesAny(text, [/\bcodex\b/, /\bllm\b/, /\blanguage model\b/, /\bmodel judgment\b/, /\bai inference\b/, /\bassistant judgment\b/, /코덱스|언어\s*모델|모델\s*판단|AI\s*추론|LLM/])) {
+        bases.push("ai_inference");
+    }
+    const unique = [...new Set(bases)];
+    if (unique.length > 1)
+        return "mixed";
+    return unique[0];
+}
+function resolveQuestionRecordMetadata(input) {
+    const commitmentFamily = input.commitmentFamily ?? inferCommitmentFamily(input);
+    const epistemicBasis = input.epistemicBasis ?? inferEpistemicBasis(input);
+    return {
+        ...(commitmentFamily ? { commitmentFamily } : {}),
+        ...(epistemicBasis ? { epistemicBasis } : {})
+    };
+}
 function hasFollowUpPrompt(record, prompt) {
     return record.prompt.rationale.includes(`${FOLLOW_UP_PROMPT_PREFIX} ${prompt}`);
 }
@@ -1705,31 +2348,43 @@ export async function createWorkspaceFollowUpQuestions(options) {
     if (specsToCreate.length === 0) {
         return { questions: pendingMatches, state, created: false, alreadyAnswered: false };
     }
-    const questions = specsToCreate.map((spec) => ({
-        id: createId("question_record"),
-        createdAt,
-        updatedAt: createdAt,
-        status: "pending",
-        prompt: {
-            id: createId("question_prompt"),
-            checkpointKey: `follow_up_${spec.key}`,
+    const questions = specsToCreate.map((spec) => {
+        const checkpointKey = `follow_up_${spec.key}`;
+        const rationale = [
+            spec.whyNow,
+            `Question kind: ${spec.kind}`,
+            `Question confidence: ${spec.confidence}`,
+            `${FOLLOW_UP_PROMPT_PREFIX} ${options.prompt}`
+        ];
+        const metadata = resolveQuestionRecordMetadata({
+            checkpointKey,
             title: spec.title,
             question: spec.question,
-            type: "single_choice",
-            options: spec.options,
-            allowOther: true,
-            otherLabel: "Other",
-            required: options.required ?? spec.required,
-            source: "runtime_guidance",
-            rationale: [
-                spec.whyNow,
-                `Question kind: ${spec.kind}`,
-                `Question confidence: ${spec.confidence}`,
-                `${FOLLOW_UP_PROMPT_PREFIX} ${options.prompt}`
-            ],
-            preferredSurfaces: preferredSurfaces
-        }
-    }));
+            prompt: options.prompt,
+            rationale
+        });
+        return {
+            id: createId("question_record"),
+            createdAt,
+            updatedAt: createdAt,
+            status: "pending",
+            ...metadata,
+            prompt: {
+                id: createId("question_prompt"),
+                checkpointKey,
+                title: spec.title,
+                question: spec.question,
+                type: "single_choice",
+                options: spec.options,
+                allowOther: true,
+                otherLabel: "Other",
+                required: options.required ?? spec.required,
+                source: "runtime_guidance",
+                rationale,
+                preferredSurfaces: preferredSurfaces
+            }
+        };
+    });
     const updated = appendQuestionRecords(state, questions);
     await writeFile(options.context.stateFilePath, JSON.stringify(updated, null, 2), "utf8");
     await syncCurrentWorkspaceView(options.context);
@@ -1743,16 +2398,35 @@ export async function createWorkspaceQuestion(options) {
     });
     const checkpointKey = options.checkpointKey ?? trigger.signal.checkpointKey;
     const createdAt = nowIso();
+    const title = options.title ?? questionTitleForCheckpoint(trigger.family, checkpointKey);
+    const questionText = options.question ?? questionTextForCheckpoint(trigger.family, options.prompt, checkpointKey);
+    const rationale = [
+        ...trigger.rationale,
+        `Trigger family: ${trigger.family}.`,
+        `Trigger confidence: ${trigger.confidence}.`,
+        `Original prompt: ${options.prompt}`
+    ];
+    const metadata = resolveQuestionRecordMetadata({
+        checkpointKey,
+        triggerFamily: trigger.family,
+        title,
+        question: questionText,
+        prompt: options.prompt,
+        rationale,
+        commitmentFamily: options.commitmentFamily,
+        epistemicBasis: options.epistemicBasis
+    });
     const question = {
         id: createId("question_record"),
         createdAt,
         updatedAt: createdAt,
         status: "pending",
+        ...metadata,
         prompt: {
             id: createId("question_prompt"),
             checkpointKey,
-            title: options.title ?? questionTitleForCheckpoint(trigger.family, checkpointKey),
-            question: options.question ?? questionTextForCheckpoint(trigger.family, options.prompt, checkpointKey),
+            title,
+            question: questionText,
             type: "single_choice",
             options: options.questionOptions ?? optionsForCheckpointTrigger(trigger.family, checkpointKey),
             allowOther: true,
@@ -1760,12 +2434,7 @@ export async function createWorkspaceQuestion(options) {
             required: options.required ?? trigger.requiresQuestionBeforeClosure,
             source: "checkpoint",
             displayReason: options.displayReason ?? trigger.rationale[0],
-            rationale: [
-                ...trigger.rationale,
-                `Trigger family: ${trigger.family}.`,
-                `Trigger confidence: ${trigger.confidence}.`,
-                `Original prompt: ${options.prompt}`
-            ],
+            rationale,
             preferredSurfaces: options.provider === "claude"
                 ? ["native_structured", "numbered"]
                 : ["mcp_elicitation", "numbered"]
@@ -1892,6 +2561,8 @@ export async function answerWorkspaceQuestion(options) {
         level: question.prompt.required ? "adaptive_required" : "recommended",
         mode: "commit",
         summary: `Answered ${question.prompt.title}: ${answer.selectedLabels.join(", ")}`,
+        ...(question.commitmentFamily ? { commitmentFamily: question.commitmentFamily } : {}),
+        ...(question.epistemicBasis ? { epistemicBasis: question.epistemicBasis } : {}),
         selectedOption: answer.selectedValues[0],
         ...(rationale ? { rationale } : {})
     };