@lodestar/beacon-node 1.35.0-dev.98d359db41 → 1.35.0-dev.a70bac5bd3

package/src/network/peers/utils/prioritizePeers.ts

@@ -1,627 +0,0 @@
-import {Direction, PeerId} from "@libp2p/interface";
-import {BitArray} from "@chainsafe/ssz";
-import {ChainConfig} from "@lodestar/config";
-import {ATTESTATION_SUBNET_COUNT, SYNC_COMMITTEE_SUBNET_COUNT} from "@lodestar/params";
-import {CustodyIndex, Status, SubnetID, altair, phase0} from "@lodestar/types";
-import {MapDef} from "@lodestar/utils";
-import {shuffle} from "../../../util/shuffle.js";
-import {sortBy} from "../../../util/sortBy.js";
-import {NetworkCoreMetrics} from "../../core/metrics.js";
-import {RequestedSubnet} from "./subnetMap.js";
-
-/** Target number of peers we'd like to have connected to a given long-lived subnet */
-const TARGET_SUBNET_PEERS = 6;
-
-/**
- * This is for non-sampling groups only. This is a very easy number to achieve given an average of 6.25 peers per column subnet on public networks.
- * This is needed to always maintain some minimum peers on all subnets so that when we publish a block, we're sure we pubish to all column subnets.
- */
-const TARGET_GROUP_PEERS_PER_SUBNET = 4;
-
-/**
- * This is used in the pruning logic. We avoid pruning peers on sync-committees if doing so would
- * lower our peer count below this number. Instead we favour a non-uniform distribution of subnet
- * peers.
- */
-const MIN_SYNC_COMMITTEE_PEERS = 2;
-
-/**
- * Lighthouse has this value as 0. However, as monitored in Lodestar mainnet node, the max score is 0
- * and average score is -0.5 to 0 so we want this value to be a little bit more relaxed
- */
-const LOW_SCORE_TO_PRUNE_IF_TOO_MANY_PEERS = -2;
-
-/**
- * Instead of attempting to connect the exact amount necessary this will overshoot a little since the success
- * rate of outgoing connections is low, <33%. If we try to connect exactly `targetPeers - connectedPeerCount` the
- * peer count will almost always be just below targetPeers triggering constant discoveries that are not necessary
- */
-const PEERS_TO_CONNECT_OVERSHOOT_FACTOR = 3;
-
-/**
- * Keep at least 10% of outbound peers. For rationale, see https://github.com/ChainSafe/lodestar/issues/2215
- */
-const OUTBOUND_PEERS_RATIO = 0.1;
-
-const attnetsZero = BitArray.fromBitLen(ATTESTATION_SUBNET_COUNT);
-const syncnetsZero = BitArray.fromBitLen(SYNC_COMMITTEE_SUBNET_COUNT);
-
-type SubnetDiscvQuery = {subnet: SubnetID; toSlot: number; maxPeersToDiscover: number};
-
-/**
- * A map of das custody group index to maxPeersToDiscover
- */
-export type CustodyGroupQueries = Map<CustodyIndex, number>;
-
-/**
- * Comparison of our status vs a peer's status.
- *
- * The main usage of this score is to feed into peer priorization during syncing, and especially when the node is having trouble finding data during syncing
- *
- * For network stability, we DON'T distinguish peers that are far behind us vs peers that are close to us.
- */
-enum StatusScore {
-  /** The peer is close to our chain */
-  CLOSE_TO_US = -1,
-  /** The peer is far ahead of chain */
-  FAR_AHEAD = 0,
-}
-
-/**
- * In practice, this score only tracks if the peer is far ahead of us or not during syncing.
- * When the node is synced, the peer is always CLOSE_TO_US.
- */
-function computeStatusScore(ours: Status, theirs: Status | null, opts: PrioritizePeersOpts): StatusScore {
-  if (theirs === null) {
-    return StatusScore.CLOSE_TO_US;
-  }
-
-  if (theirs.finalizedEpoch > ours.finalizedEpoch) {
-    return StatusScore.FAR_AHEAD;
-  }
-
-  if (theirs.headSlot > ours.headSlot + opts.starvationThresholdSlots) {
-    return StatusScore.FAR_AHEAD;
-  }
-
-  // It's dangerous to downscore peers that are far behind.
-  // This means we'd be more likely to disconnect peers that are attempting to sync, which would affect network stability.
-  // if (ours.headSlot > theirs.headSlot + opts.starvationThresholdSlots) {
-  //   return StatusScore.FAR_BEHIND;
-  // }
-
-  return StatusScore.CLOSE_TO_US;
-}
-
-type PeerInfo = {
-  id: PeerId;
-  direction: Direction | null;
-  statusScore: StatusScore;
-  attnets: phase0.AttestationSubnets;
-  syncnets: altair.SyncSubnets;
-  samplingGroups: CustodyIndex[];
-  attnetsTrueBitIndices: number[];
-  syncnetsTrueBitIndices: number[];
-  score: number;
-};
-
-export type PrioritizePeersOpts = {
-  targetPeers: number;
-  maxPeers: number;
-  targetGroupPeers: number;
-  status: Status;
-  starved: boolean;
-  starvationPruneRatio: number;
-  starvationThresholdSlots: number;
-  outboundPeersRatio?: number;
-  targetSubnetPeers?: number;
-};
-
-export enum ExcessPeerDisconnectReason {
-  LOW_SCORE = "low_score",
-  NO_LONG_LIVED_SUBNET = "no_long_lived_subnet",
-  TOO_GROUPED_SUBNET = "too_grouped_subnet",
-  FIND_BETTER_PEERS = "find_better_peers",
-}
-
-/**
- * Prioritize which peers to disconect and which to connect. Conditions:
- * - Reach `targetPeers`
- *   - If we're starved for data, prune additional peers
- * - Don't exceed `maxPeers`
- * - Ensure there are enough peers per column subnets, attestation subnets and sync committee subnets
- * - Prioritize peers with good score
- *
- * pre-fulu samplingGroups is not used and this function returns empty custodyGroupQueries
- */
-export function prioritizePeers(
-  connectedPeersInfo: {
-    id: PeerId;
-    direction: Direction | null;
-    status: Status | null;
-    attnets: phase0.AttestationSubnets | null;
-    syncnets: altair.SyncSubnets | null;
-    samplingGroups: CustodyIndex[] | null;
-    score: number;
-  }[],
-  activeAttnets: RequestedSubnet[],
-  activeSyncnets: RequestedSubnet[],
-  samplingGroups: CustodyIndex[] | undefined,
-  opts: PrioritizePeersOpts,
-  config: ChainConfig,
-  metrics: NetworkCoreMetrics | null
-): {
-  peersToConnect: number;
-  peersToDisconnect: Map<ExcessPeerDisconnectReason, PeerId[]>;
-  attnetQueries: SubnetDiscvQuery[];
-  syncnetQueries: SubnetDiscvQuery[];
-  custodyGroupQueries: CustodyGroupQueries;
-} {
-  const {targetPeers, maxPeers} = opts;
-
-  let peersToConnect = 0;
-  const peersToDisconnect = new MapDef<ExcessPeerDisconnectReason, PeerId[]>(() => []);
-
-  // Pre-compute trueBitIndexes for re-use below. Set null subnets Maps to default zero value
-  const connectedPeers = connectedPeersInfo.map(
-    (peer): PeerInfo => ({
-      id: peer.id,
-      direction: peer.direction,
-      statusScore: computeStatusScore(opts.status, peer.status, opts),
-      attnets: peer.attnets ?? attnetsZero,
-      syncnets: peer.syncnets ?? syncnetsZero,
-      samplingGroups: peer.samplingGroups ?? [],
-      attnetsTrueBitIndices: peer.attnets?.getTrueBitIndexes() ?? [],
-      syncnetsTrueBitIndices: peer.syncnets?.getTrueBitIndexes() ?? [],
-      score: peer.score,
-    })
-  );
-
-  const {attnetQueries, syncnetQueries, custodyGroupQueries, dutiesByPeer} = requestSubnetPeers(
-    connectedPeers,
-    activeAttnets,
-    activeSyncnets,
-    samplingGroups,
-    opts,
-    config,
-    metrics
-  );
-
-  const connectedPeerCount = connectedPeers.length;
-
-  if (connectedPeerCount < targetPeers) {
-    // Need more peers.
-    // Instead of attempting to connect the exact amount necessary this will overshoot a little since the success
-    // rate of outgoing connections is low, <33%. If we try to connect exactly `targetPeers - connectedPeerCount` the
-    // peer count will almost always be just below targetPeers triggering constant discoveries that are not necessary
-    peersToConnect = Math.min(
-      PEERS_TO_CONNECT_OVERSHOOT_FACTOR * (targetPeers - connectedPeerCount),
-      // Never attempt to connect more peers than maxPeers even considering a low chance of dial success
-      maxPeers - connectedPeerCount
-    );
-  } else if (connectedPeerCount > targetPeers) {
-    pruneExcessPeers(connectedPeers, dutiesByPeer, activeAttnets, peersToDisconnect, opts);
-  }
-
-  return {
-    peersToConnect,
-    peersToDisconnect,
-    attnetQueries,
-    syncnetQueries,
-    custodyGroupQueries,
-  };
-}
-
-/**
- * If more peers are needed in attnets and syncnets and column subnets, create SubnetDiscvQuery for each subnet
- * pre-fulu samplingGroups is not used and this function returns empty custodyGroupQueries
- */
-function requestSubnetPeers(
-  connectedPeers: PeerInfo[],
-  activeAttnets: RequestedSubnet[],
-  activeSyncnets: RequestedSubnet[],
-  ourSamplingGroups: CustodyIndex[] | undefined,
-  opts: PrioritizePeersOpts,
-  config: ChainConfig,
-  metrics: NetworkCoreMetrics | null
-): {
-  attnetQueries: SubnetDiscvQuery[];
-  syncnetQueries: SubnetDiscvQuery[];
-  custodyGroupQueries: CustodyGroupQueries;
-  dutiesByPeer: Map<PeerInfo, number>;
-} {
-  const {targetSubnetPeers = TARGET_SUBNET_PEERS} = opts;
-  const attnetQueries: SubnetDiscvQuery[] = [];
-  const syncnetQueries: SubnetDiscvQuery[] = [];
-
-  // To filter out peers containing enough attnets of interest from possible disconnection
-  const dutiesByPeer = new Map<PeerInfo, number>();
-
-  // attnets, do we need queries for more peers
-  if (activeAttnets.length > 0) {
-    /** Map of peers per subnet, peer may be in multiple arrays */
-    const peersPerSubnet = new Map<number, number>();
-
-    for (const peer of connectedPeers) {
-      const trueBitIndices = peer.attnetsTrueBitIndices;
-      let dutyCount = 0;
-      for (const {subnet} of activeAttnets) {
-        if (trueBitIndices.includes(subnet)) {
-          dutyCount += 1;
-          peersPerSubnet.set(subnet, 1 + (peersPerSubnet.get(subnet) ?? 0));
-        }
-      }
-      dutiesByPeer.set(peer, dutyCount);
-    }
-
-    for (const {subnet, toSlot} of activeAttnets) {
-      const peersInSubnet = peersPerSubnet.get(subnet) ?? 0;
-      if (peersInSubnet < targetSubnetPeers) {
-        // We need more peers
-        attnetQueries.push({subnet, toSlot, maxPeersToDiscover: targetSubnetPeers - peersInSubnet});
-      }
-    }
-  }
-
-  // syncnets, do we need queries for more peers
-  if (activeSyncnets.length > 0) {
-    /** Map of peers per subnet, peer may be in multiple arrays */
-    const peersPerSubnet = new Map<number, number>();
-
-    for (const peer of connectedPeers) {
-      const trueBitIndices = peer.syncnetsTrueBitIndices;
-      let dutyCount = dutiesByPeer.get(peer) ?? 0;
-      for (const {subnet} of activeSyncnets) {
-        if (trueBitIndices.includes(subnet)) {
-          dutyCount += 1;
-          peersPerSubnet.set(subnet, 1 + (peersPerSubnet.get(subnet) ?? 0));
-        }
-      }
-      dutiesByPeer.set(peer, dutyCount);
-    }
-
-    for (const {subnet, toSlot} of activeSyncnets) {
-      const peersInSubnet = peersPerSubnet.get(subnet) ?? 0;
-      if (peersInSubnet < targetSubnetPeers) {
-        // We need more peers
-        syncnetQueries.push({subnet, toSlot, maxPeersToDiscover: targetSubnetPeers - peersInSubnet});
-      }
-    }
-  }
-
-  const custodyGroupQueries: CustodyGroupQueries = new Map();
-  // pre-fulu
-  if (ourSamplingGroups == null) {
-    return {attnetQueries, syncnetQueries, custodyGroupQueries, dutiesByPeer};
-  }
-
-  // column subnets, do we need queries for more peers
-  const targetGroupPeersPerSamplingGroup = opts.targetGroupPeers;
-  const peersPerGroup = new Map<CustodyIndex, number>();
-  for (const peer of connectedPeers) {
-    const peerSamplingGroups = peer.samplingGroups;
-    for (const group of peerSamplingGroups) {
-      peersPerGroup.set(group, 1 + (peersPerGroup.get(group) ?? 0));
-    }
-  }
-
-  const ourSamplingGroupSet = new Set(ourSamplingGroups);
-  for (let groupIndex = 0; groupIndex < config.NUMBER_OF_CUSTODY_GROUPS; groupIndex++) {
-    const peersInGroup = peersPerGroup.get(groupIndex) ?? 0;
-    metrics?.peerCountPerSamplingGroup.set({groupIndex}, peersInGroup);
-    const targetGroupPeers = ourSamplingGroupSet.has(groupIndex)
-      ? targetGroupPeersPerSamplingGroup
-      : TARGET_GROUP_PEERS_PER_SUBNET;
-    if (peersInGroup < targetGroupPeers) {
-      // We need more peers
-      custodyGroupQueries.set(groupIndex, targetGroupPeers - peersInGroup);
-    }
-  }
-
-  return {attnetQueries, syncnetQueries, custodyGroupQueries, dutiesByPeer};
-}
-
-/**
- * Remove excess peers back down to our target values.
- * 1. Remove peers that are not subscribed to a subnet (they have less value)
- * 2. Remove worst scoring peers
- * 3. Remove peers that we have many on any particular subnet
- *   - Only consider removing peers on subnet that has > TARGET_SUBNET_PEERS to be safe
- *   - If we have a choice, do not remove peer that would drop us below targetPeersPerAttnetSubnet
- *   - If we have a choice, do not remove peer that would drop us below MIN_SYNC_COMMITTEE_PEERS
- *
- * Although the logic looks complicated, we'd prune 5 peers max per heartbeat based on the mainnet config.
- */
-function pruneExcessPeers(
-  connectedPeers: PeerInfo[],
-  dutiesByPeer: Map<PeerInfo, number>,
-  activeAttnets: RequestedSubnet[],
-  peersToDisconnect: MapDef<ExcessPeerDisconnectReason, PeerId[]>,
-  opts: PrioritizePeersOpts
-): void {
-  const {targetPeers, targetSubnetPeers = TARGET_SUBNET_PEERS, outboundPeersRatio = OUTBOUND_PEERS_RATIO} = opts;
-  const connectedPeerCount = connectedPeers.length;
-  const outboundPeersTarget = Math.round(outboundPeersRatio * connectedPeerCount);
-
-  // Count outbound peers
-  let outboundPeers = 0;
-  for (const peer of connectedPeers) {
-    if (peer.direction === "outbound") {
-      outboundPeers++;
-    }
-  }
-
-  let outboundPeersEligibleForPruning = 0;
-
-  const sortedPeers = sortPeersToPrune(connectedPeers, dutiesByPeer);
-
-  const peersEligibleForPruning = sortedPeers
-    // Then, iterate from highest score to lowest doing a manual filter for duties and outbound ratio
-    .filter((peer) => {
-      // Peers with duties are not eligible for pruning
-      if ((dutiesByPeer.get(peer) ?? 0) > 0) {
-        return false;
-      }
-
-      // Peers far ahead when we're starved for data are not eligible for pruning
-      if (opts.starved && peer.statusScore === StatusScore.FAR_AHEAD) {
-        return false;
-      }
-
-      // outbound peers up to OUTBOUND_PEER_RATIO sorted by highest score and not eligible for pruning
-      if (peer.direction === "outbound") {
-        if (outboundPeers - outboundPeersEligibleForPruning > outboundPeersTarget) {
-          outboundPeersEligibleForPruning++;
-        } else {
-          return false;
-        }
-      }
-
-      return true;
-    });
-
-  let peersToDisconnectCount = 0;
-  const noLongLivedSubnetPeersToDisconnect: PeerId[] = [];
-
-  const peersToDisconnectTarget =
-    // if we're starved for data, prune additional peers
-    connectedPeerCount - targetPeers + (opts.starved ? targetPeers * opts.starvationPruneRatio : 0);
-
-  // 1. Lodestar prefers disconnecting peers that does not have long lived subnets
-  // See https://github.com/ChainSafe/lodestar/issues/3940
-  // peers with low score will be disconnected through heartbeat in the end
-  for (const peer of peersEligibleForPruning) {
-    const hasLongLivedSubnet = peer.attnetsTrueBitIndices.length > 0 || peer.syncnetsTrueBitIndices.length > 0;
-    if (!hasLongLivedSubnet && peersToDisconnectCount < peersToDisconnectTarget) {
-      noLongLivedSubnetPeersToDisconnect.push(peer.id);
-      peersToDisconnectCount++;
-    }
-  }
-  peersToDisconnect.set(ExcessPeerDisconnectReason.NO_LONG_LIVED_SUBNET, noLongLivedSubnetPeersToDisconnect);
-
-  // 2. Disconnect peers that have score < LOW_SCORE_TO_PRUNE_IF_TOO_MANY_PEERS
-  const badScorePeersToDisconnect: PeerId[] = [];
-  for (const peer of peersEligibleForPruning) {
-    if (
-      peer.score < LOW_SCORE_TO_PRUNE_IF_TOO_MANY_PEERS &&
-      peersToDisconnectCount < peersToDisconnectTarget &&
-      !noLongLivedSubnetPeersToDisconnect.includes(peer.id)
-    ) {
-      badScorePeersToDisconnect.push(peer.id);
-      peersToDisconnectCount++;
-    }
-  }
-  peersToDisconnect.set(ExcessPeerDisconnectReason.LOW_SCORE, badScorePeersToDisconnect);
-
-  // 3. Disconnect peers that are too grouped on any given subnet
-  const tooGroupedPeersToDisconnect: PeerId[] = [];
-  if (peersToDisconnectCount < peersToDisconnectTarget) {
-    // PeerInfo array by attestation subnet
-    const subnetToPeers = new MapDef<number, PeerInfo[]>(() => []);
-    // number of peers per long lived sync committee
-    const syncCommitteePeerCount = new MapDef<number, number>(() => 0);
-
-    // populate the above variables
-    for (const peer of connectedPeers) {
-      if (noLongLivedSubnetPeersToDisconnect.includes(peer.id) || badScorePeersToDisconnect.includes(peer.id)) {
-        continue;
-      }
-      for (const subnet of peer.attnetsTrueBitIndices) {
-        subnetToPeers.getOrDefault(subnet).push(peer);
-      }
-      for (const subnet of peer.syncnetsTrueBitIndices) {
-        syncCommitteePeerCount.set(subnet, 1 + syncCommitteePeerCount.getOrDefault(subnet));
-      }
-    }
-
-    while (peersToDisconnectCount < peersToDisconnectTarget) {
-      const maxPeersSubnet = findMaxPeersSubnet(subnetToPeers, targetSubnetPeers);
-      // peers are NOT too grouped on any given subnet, finish this loop
-      if (maxPeersSubnet === null) {
-        break;
-      }
-
-      const peersOnMostGroupedSubnet = subnetToPeers.get(maxPeersSubnet);
-      if (peersOnMostGroupedSubnet === undefined) {
-        break;
-      }
-
-      // Find peers to remove from the current maxPeersSubnet
-      const removedPeer = findPeerToRemove(
-        subnetToPeers,
-        syncCommitteePeerCount,
-        peersOnMostGroupedSubnet,
-        targetSubnetPeers,
-        activeAttnets
-      );
-
-      // If we have successfully found a candidate peer to prune, prune it,
-      // otherwise all peers on this subnet should not be removed.
-      // In this case, we remove all peers from the pruning logic and try another subnet.
-      if (removedPeer != null) {
-        // recalculate variables
-        removePeerFromSubnetToPeers(subnetToPeers, removedPeer);
-        decreaseSynccommitteePeerCount(syncCommitteePeerCount, removedPeer.syncnetsTrueBitIndices);
-
-        tooGroupedPeersToDisconnect.push(removedPeer.id);
-        peersToDisconnectCount++;
-      } else {
-        // no peer to remove from the maxPeersSubnet
-        // should continue with the 2nd biggest maxPeersSubnet
-        subnetToPeers.delete(maxPeersSubnet);
-      }
-    }
-
-    peersToDisconnect.set(ExcessPeerDisconnectReason.TOO_GROUPED_SUBNET, tooGroupedPeersToDisconnect);
-
-    // 4. Ensure to always to prune to target peers
-    // In rare case, all peers may have duties and good score but very low long lived subnet,
-    // and not too grouped to any subnets, we need to always disconnect peers until it reaches targetPeers
-    // because we want to keep improving peers (long lived subnets + score)
-    // otherwise we'll not able to accept new peer connection to consider better peers
-    // see https://github.com/ChainSafe/lodestar/issues/5198
-    const remainingPeersToDisconnect: PeerId[] = [];
-    for (const {id} of sortedPeers) {
-      if (peersToDisconnectCount >= peersToDisconnectTarget) {
-        break;
-      }
-      if (
-        noLongLivedSubnetPeersToDisconnect.includes(id) ||
-        badScorePeersToDisconnect.includes(id) ||
-        tooGroupedPeersToDisconnect.includes(id)
-      ) {
-        continue;
-      }
-      remainingPeersToDisconnect.push(id);
-      peersToDisconnectCount++;
-    }
-
-    peersToDisconnect.set(ExcessPeerDisconnectReason.FIND_BETTER_PEERS, remainingPeersToDisconnect);
-  }
-}
-
-/**
- * Sort peers ascending, peer-0 has the most chance to prune, peer-n has the least.
- * Shuffling first to break ties.
- * prefer sorting by status score (applicable during syncing), then dutied subnets, then number of long lived subnets, then peer score
- * peer score is the last criteria since they are supposed to be in the same score range,
- * bad score peers are removed by peer manager anyway
- */
-export function sortPeersToPrune(connectedPeers: PeerInfo[], dutiesByPeer: Map<PeerInfo, number>): PeerInfo[] {
-  return shuffle(connectedPeers).sort((p1, p2) => {
-    const dutiedSubnet1 = dutiesByPeer.get(p1) ?? 0;
-    const dutiedSubnet2 = dutiesByPeer.get(p2) ?? 0;
-    if (dutiedSubnet1 === dutiedSubnet2) {
-      const statusScore = p1.statusScore - p2.statusScore;
-      if (statusScore !== 0) {
-        return statusScore;
-      }
-      const [longLivedSubnets1, longLivedSubnets2] = [p1, p2].map(
-        (p) => p.attnetsTrueBitIndices.length + p.syncnetsTrueBitIndices.length
-      );
-      if (longLivedSubnets1 === longLivedSubnets2) {
-        return p1.score - p2.score;
-      }
-      return longLivedSubnets1 - longLivedSubnets2;
-    }
-    return dutiedSubnet1 - dutiedSubnet2;
-  });
-}
-
-/**
- * Find subnet that has the most peers and > TARGET_SUBNET_PEERS, return null if peers are not grouped
- * to any subnets.
- */
-function findMaxPeersSubnet(subnetToPeers: Map<number, PeerInfo[]>, targetSubnetPeers: number): SubnetID | null {
-  let maxPeersSubnet: SubnetID | null = null;
-  let maxPeerCountPerSubnet = -1;
-
-  for (const [subnet, peers] of subnetToPeers) {
-    if (peers.length > targetSubnetPeers && peers.length > maxPeerCountPerSubnet) {
-      maxPeersSubnet = subnet;
-      maxPeerCountPerSubnet = peers.length;
-    }
-  }
-
-  return maxPeersSubnet;
-}
-
-/**
- * Find peers to remove from the current maxPeersSubnet.
- * In the long term, this logic will help us gradually find peers with more long lived subnet.
- * Return null if we should not remove any peer on the most grouped subnet.
- */
-function findPeerToRemove(
-  subnetToPeers: Map<number, PeerInfo[]>,
-  syncCommitteePeerCount: Map<number, number>,
-  peersOnMostGroupedSubnet: PeerInfo[],
-  targetSubnetPeers: number,
-  activeAttnets: RequestedSubnet[]
-): PeerInfo | null {
-  const peersOnSubnet = sortBy(peersOnMostGroupedSubnet, (peer) => peer.attnetsTrueBitIndices.length);
-  let removedPeer: PeerInfo | null = null;
-  for (const candidatePeer of peersOnSubnet) {
-    // new logic of lodestar
-    const attnetIndices = candidatePeer.attnetsTrueBitIndices;
-    if (attnetIndices.length > 0) {
-      const requestedSubnets = activeAttnets.map((activeAttnet) => activeAttnet.subnet);
-      let minAttnetCount = ATTESTATION_SUBNET_COUNT;
-      // intersection of requested subnets and subnets that peer subscribes to
-      for (const subnet of requestedSubnets) {
-        const numSubnetPeers = subnetToPeers.get(subnet)?.length;
-        if (numSubnetPeers !== undefined && numSubnetPeers < minAttnetCount && attnetIndices.includes(subnet)) {
-          minAttnetCount = numSubnetPeers;
-        }
-      }
-      // shouldn't remove this peer because it drops us below targetSubnetPeers
-      if (minAttnetCount <= targetSubnetPeers) {
-        continue;
-      }
-    }
-
-    // same logic to lighthouse
-    const syncnetIndices = candidatePeer.syncnetsTrueBitIndices;
-    // The peer is subscribed to some long-lived sync-committees
-    if (syncnetIndices.length > 0) {
-      const minSubnetCount = Math.min(...syncnetIndices.map((subnet) => syncCommitteePeerCount.get(subnet) ?? 0));
-      // If the minimum count is our target or lower, we
-      // shouldn't remove this peer, because it drops us lower
-      // than our target
-      if (minSubnetCount <= MIN_SYNC_COMMITTEE_PEERS) {
-        continue;
-      }
-    }
-
-    // ok, found a peer to remove
-    removedPeer = candidatePeer;
-    break;
-  }
-
-  return removedPeer;
-}
-
-/**
- * Remove a peer from subnetToPeers map.
- */
-function removePeerFromSubnetToPeers(subnetToPeers: Map<number, PeerInfo[]>, removedPeer: PeerInfo): void {
-  for (const peers of subnetToPeers.values()) {
-    const index = peers.findIndex((peer) => peer === removedPeer);
-    if (index >= 0) {
-      peers.splice(index, 1);
-    }
-  }
-}
-
-/**
- * Decrease the syncCommitteePeerCount from the specified committees set
- */
-function decreaseSynccommitteePeerCount(
-  syncCommitteePeerCount: MapDef<number, number>,
-  committees: number[] | undefined
-): void {
-  if (committees) {
-    for (const syncCommittee of committees) {
-      syncCommitteePeerCount.set(syncCommittee, Math.max(syncCommitteePeerCount.getOrDefault(syncCommittee) - 1, 0));
-    }
-  }
-}