@llblab/pi-kit 0.1.0

package/node_modules/@llblab/pi-actors/dist/skills/swarm/recipes/subagent-critic.json

@@ -0,0 +1,22 @@
+{
+  "async": true,
+  "args": [
+    "target:string",
+    "lens:string",
+    "constraints:string",
+    "risk_policy:string",
+    "output_format:string",
+    "model:string",
+    "thinking:string",
+    "tools:string"
+  ],
+  "defaults": {
+    "lens": "assumption and failure-mode critic",
+    "constraints": "Stay bounded to the target; do not redesign unrelated systems.",
+    "risk_policy": "Prefer falsifiable objections and separate blockers from caveats.",
+    "output_format": "Markdown sections: Assumptions, Failure Modes, Counterarguments, Tests, Recommendation.",
+    "thinking": "medium",
+    "tools": ""
+  },
+  "template": "pi -p --model {model} --thinking {thinking} {tools?--tools:--no-tools} {tools} Critique this target through lens {lens}: {target}. Constraints: {constraints}. Risk policy: {risk_policy}. Output format: {output_format}"
+}

package/node_modules/@llblab/pi-actors/dist/skills/swarm/recipes/subagent-evidence-map.json

@@ -0,0 +1,20 @@
+{
+  "async": true,
+  "args": [
+    "question:string",
+    "sources:string",
+    "source_policy:string",
+    "output_format:string",
+    "model:string",
+    "thinking:string",
+    "tools:string"
+  ],
+  "defaults": {
+    "sources": "Use only provided source notes, inspected artifacts, or explicit uncertainty.",
+    "source_policy": "Separate direct evidence, weak evidence, contradictions, and missing evidence.",
+    "output_format": "Markdown sections: Question, Evidence Map, Contradictions, Missing Evidence, Confidence.",
+    "thinking": "medium",
+    "tools": ""
+  },
+  "template": "pi -p --model {model} --thinking {thinking} {tools?--tools:--no-tools} {tools} Build an evidence map for question: {question}. Sources: {sources}. Source policy: {source_policy}. Output format: {output_format}"
+}

package/node_modules/@llblab/pi-actors/dist/skills/swarm/recipes/subagent-followup.json

@@ -0,0 +1,21 @@
+{
+  "async": true,
+  "args": [
+    "checkpoint:string",
+    "reply:string",
+    "mode:enum(same-context,degraded-new-branch)",
+    "continuity_policy:string",
+    "output_format:string",
+    "model:string",
+    "thinking:string",
+    "tools:string"
+  ],
+  "defaults": {
+    "mode": "degraded-new-branch",
+    "continuity_policy": "If mode is degraded-new-branch, explicitly state what context continuity was lost and what was reconstructed from the checkpoint.",
+    "output_format": "Markdown sections: Continuation Mode, Applied Reply, Lost Context, Continued Work, Next Actions.",
+    "thinking": "off",
+    "tools": ""
+  },
+  "template": "pi -p --model {model} --thinking {thinking} {tools?--tools:--no-tools} {tools} Continue from checkpoint using mode {mode}. Checkpoint: {checkpoint}. Coordinator reply: {reply}. Continuity policy: {continuity_policy}. Output format: {output_format}"
+}

package/node_modules/@llblab/pi-actors/dist/skills/swarm/recipes/subagent-judge.json

@@ -0,0 +1,22 @@
+{
+  "async": true,
+  "args": [
+    "report:string",
+    "rubric:string",
+    "evidence:string",
+    "output_format:string",
+    "model:string",
+    "thinking:string",
+    "tools:string"
+  ],
+  "defaults": {
+    "rubric": "Judge evidence preservation, severity calibration, consensus purity, internal consistency, and merge bias.",
+    "evidence": "Use the provided raw outputs or artifact paths; mark any missing evidence.",
+    "output_format": "Markdown sections: Verdict, Issues, Evidence Preservation, Bias Risks, Required Fixes.",
+    "model": "{current_model}",
+    "thinking": "{current_thinking}",
+    "tools": ""
+  },
+  "accept_output": "review_evidence",
+  "template": "pi -p --model {model} --thinking {thinking} {tools?--tools:--no-tools} {tools} Judge this report: {report}. Rubric: {rubric}. Evidence: {evidence}. Begin the response with ACTOR_REVIEW_RESULT on its own line. Output format: {output_format}"
+}

package/node_modules/@llblab/pi-actors/dist/skills/swarm/recipes/subagent-merge.json

@@ -0,0 +1,24 @@
+{
+  "async": true,
+  "args": [
+    "inputs:string",
+    "mode:enum(consensus-first,risk-first)",
+    "merge_policy:string",
+    "risk_policy:string",
+    "output_format:string",
+    "model:string",
+    "thinking:string",
+    "tools:string"
+  ],
+  "defaults": {
+    "mode": "consensus-first",
+    "merge_policy": "Preserve partial reviewer evidence, branch status, and degraded confidence markers.",
+    "risk_policy": "Preserve minority severe findings and mark merger-added claims explicitly.",
+    "output_format": "Markdown sections: Summary, Consensus, Minority Findings, Contradictions, Next Actions.",
+    "model": "{current_model}",
+    "thinking": "{current_thinking}",
+    "tools": ""
+  },
+  "accept_output": "review_evidence",
+  "template": "pi -p --model {model} --thinking {thinking} {tools?--tools:--no-tools} {tools} Merge these subagent outputs using mode {mode}: {inputs}. Merge policy: {merge_policy}. Risk policy: {risk_policy}. Begin the response with ACTOR_REVIEW_RESULT on its own line. Output format: {output_format}"
+}

package/node_modules/@llblab/pi-actors/dist/skills/swarm/recipes/subagent-normalize.json

@@ -0,0 +1,20 @@
+{
+  "async": true,
+  "args": [
+    "input:string",
+    "format:string",
+    "preservation_policy:string",
+    "model:string",
+    "thinking:string",
+    "tools:string"
+  ],
+  "defaults": {
+    "format": "Markdown sections: Summary, Findings, Evidence, Risks, Next Actions.",
+    "preservation_policy": "Do not change meaning, severity, evidence, or uncertainty while normalizing.",
+    "model": "{current_model}",
+    "thinking": "{current_thinking}",
+    "tools": ""
+  },
+  "accept_output": "review_evidence",
+  "template": "pi -p --model {model} --thinking {thinking} {tools?--tools:--no-tools} {tools} Normalize this subagent output. Begin the response with ACTOR_REVIEW_RESULT on its own line. Target format: {format}. Preservation policy: {preservation_policy}. Input: {input}"
+}

package/node_modules/@llblab/pi-actors/dist/skills/swarm/recipes/subagent-plan.json

@@ -0,0 +1,20 @@
+{
+  "async": true,
+  "args": [
+    "goal:string",
+    "constraints:string",
+    "scope:string",
+    "output_format:string",
+    "model:string",
+    "thinking:string",
+    "tools:string"
+  ],
+  "defaults": {
+    "constraints": "Prefer small reversible slices, explicit validation gates, and no broad speculative rewrites.",
+    "scope": "Use the provided problem statement and any named artifact paths.",
+    "output_format": "Markdown sections: Goal, Constraints, Plan Slices, Risks, Validation Gates, Stop Conditions.",
+    "thinking": "medium",
+    "tools": ""
+  },
+  "template": "pi -p --model {model} --thinking {thinking} {tools?--tools:--no-tools} {tools} Plan how to reach this goal: {goal}. Scope: {scope}. Constraints: {constraints}. Output format: {output_format}"
+}

package/node_modules/@llblab/pi-actors/dist/skills/swarm/recipes/subagent-preflight.json

@@ -0,0 +1,18 @@
+{
+  "async": true,
+  "args": [
+    "stage:string",
+    "model:string",
+    "thinking:string",
+    "tools:string",
+    "output_format:string"
+  ],
+  "defaults": {
+    "stage": "subagent",
+    "model": "{current_model}",
+    "thinking": "{current_thinking}",
+    "tools": "",
+    "output_format": "Reply exactly: ACTOR_PREFLIGHT_OK"
+  },
+  "template": "pi -p --model {model} --thinking {thinking} {tools?--tools:--no-tools} {tools} Preflight check for stage {stage}. Confirm this model, thinking level, and tool policy can start before expensive fanout. Do not inspect files. {output_format}"
+}

package/node_modules/@llblab/pi-actors/dist/skills/swarm/recipes/subagent-prompt.json

@@ -0,0 +1,16 @@
+{
+  "async": true,
+  "args": [
+    "prompt:string",
+    "model:string",
+    "thinking:string",
+    "tools:string",
+    "output_format:string"
+  ],
+  "defaults": {
+    "thinking": "off",
+    "tools": "",
+    "output_format": "Concise Markdown with assumptions and next actions."
+  },
+  "template": "pi -p --model {model} --thinking {thinking} {tools?--tools:--no-tools} {tools} {prompt}. Output format: {output_format}"
+}

package/node_modules/@llblab/pi-actors/dist/skills/swarm/recipes/subagent-prompts.json

@@ -0,0 +1,39 @@
+{
+  "async": true,
+  "imports": {
+    "subagent": "swarm/subagent-prompt"
+  },
+  "args": [
+    "prompts:array",
+    "model:string",
+    "thinking:string",
+    "tools:string",
+    "output_format:string",
+    "report_path:path",
+    "summary_path:path"
+  ],
+  "defaults": {
+    "thinking": "off",
+    "tools": "",
+    "output_format": "Concise Markdown with assumptions and next actions.",
+    "report_path": "{state_dir}/stdout.log",
+    "summary_path": "{state_dir}/result.json"
+  },
+  "artifacts": {
+    "report": "{report_path}",
+    "summary": "{summary_path}"
+  },
+  "repeat": "{prompts.length}",
+  "parallel": true,
+  "failure": "branch",
+  "template": {
+    "name": "subagent",
+    "values": {
+      "prompt": "{prompts[index]}",
+      "model": "{model}",
+      "thinking": "{thinking}",
+      "tools": "{tools}",
+      "output_format": "{output_format}"
+    }
+  }
+}

package/node_modules/@llblab/pi-actors/dist/skills/swarm/recipes/subagent-quorum.json

@@ -0,0 +1,31 @@
+{
+  "async": true,
+  "imports": {
+    "subagent": "swarm/subagent-prompt"
+  },
+  "args": [
+    "prompt:string",
+    "models:array",
+    "thinking:string",
+    "tools:string",
+    "output_format:string"
+  ],
+  "defaults": {
+    "thinking": "off",
+    "tools": "",
+    "output_format": "Vote-style Markdown: Verdict, Rationale, Evidence, Confidence."
+  },
+  "repeat": "{models.length}",
+  "parallel": true,
+  "failure": "branch",
+  "template": {
+    "name": "subagent",
+    "values": {
+      "prompt": "{prompt}",
+      "model": "{models[index]}",
+      "thinking": "{thinking}",
+      "tools": "{tools}",
+      "output_format": "{output_format}"
+    }
+  }
+}

package/node_modules/@llblab/pi-actors/dist/skills/swarm/recipes/subagent-review-coordinator.json

@@ -0,0 +1,170 @@
+{
+  "async": true,
+  "imports": {
+    "preflight": "swarm/subagent-preflight",
+    "reviewer": "swarm/subagent-review",
+    "verifier": "swarm/subagent-verify",
+    "merger": "swarm/subagent-merge",
+    "judge": "swarm/subagent-judge",
+    "normalizer": "swarm/subagent-normalize"
+  },
+  "args": [
+    "scope:string",
+    "lenses:array",
+    "claim:string",
+    "reviewer_model:string",
+    "verifier_model:string",
+    "merger_model:string",
+    "judge_model:string",
+    "thinking:string",
+    "tools:string",
+    "subagent_ttl_ms:int",
+    "reviewer_concurrency:string",
+    "min_successful_reviewers:int",
+    "merge_policy:string",
+    "evidence_policy:string",
+    "risk_policy:string",
+    "output_format:string"
+  ],
+  "defaults": {
+    "lenses": [
+      "correctness",
+      "architecture",
+      "operator UX"
+    ],
+    "claim": "The reviewed scope is ready for the next implementation or release step.",
+    "thinking": "{current_thinking}",
+    "tools": "",
+    "subagent_ttl_ms": 600000,
+    "reviewer_concurrency": "",
+    "min_successful_reviewers": 1,
+    "merge_policy": "Preserve partial reviewer reports, branch status, and degraded confidence markers. If reviewer evidence is below threshold, do not invent consensus.",
+    "evidence_policy": "Cite inspected files, command output, or explicit uncertainty for every material claim.",
+    "risk_policy": "Preserve minority high-impact risks and separate confirmed issues from hypotheses.",
+    "output_format": "Markdown sections: Status (complete/degraded/insufficient_data), Summary, Consensus Findings, Minority Findings, Verification, Judge Notes, Risks, Next Actions.",
+    "reviewer_model": "{current_model}",
+    "verifier_model": "{current_model}",
+    "merger_model": "{current_model}",
+    "judge_model": "{current_model}"
+  },
+  "template": [
+    {
+      "parallel": true,
+      "failure": "root",
+      "template": [
+        {
+          "label": "preflight:reviewer",
+          "name": "preflight",
+          "timeout": "{subagent_ttl_ms}",
+          "values": {
+            "stage": "reviewer",
+            "model": "{reviewer_model}",
+            "thinking": "{thinking}",
+            "tools": "{tools}"
+          }
+        },
+        {
+          "label": "preflight:verifier",
+          "name": "preflight",
+          "timeout": "{subagent_ttl_ms}",
+          "values": {
+            "stage": "verifier",
+            "model": "{verifier_model}",
+            "thinking": "{thinking}",
+            "tools": "{tools}"
+          }
+        },
+        {
+          "label": "preflight:merger",
+          "name": "preflight",
+          "timeout": "{subagent_ttl_ms}",
+          "values": {
+            "stage": "merger",
+            "model": "{merger_model}",
+            "thinking": "{thinking}",
+            "tools": "{tools}"
+          }
+        },
+        {
+          "label": "preflight:judge",
+          "name": "preflight",
+          "timeout": "{subagent_ttl_ms}",
+          "values": {
+            "stage": "judge",
+            "model": "{judge_model}",
+            "thinking": "{thinking}",
+            "tools": "{tools}"
+          }
+        }
+      ]
+    },
+    {
+      "parallel": true,
+      "repeat": "{lenses.length}",
+      "concurrency": "{reviewer_concurrency}",
+      "min_successful": "{min_successful_reviewers}",
+      "failure": "branch",
+      "template": {
+        "name": "reviewer",
+        "timeout": "{subagent_ttl_ms}",
+        "values": {
+          "scope": "{scope}",
+          "lens": "{lenses[index]}",
+          "model": "{reviewer_model}",
+          "thinking": "{thinking}",
+          "tools": "{tools}",
+          "evidence_policy": "{evidence_policy}",
+          "risk_policy": "{risk_policy}"
+        }
+      }
+    },
+    {
+      "name": "verifier",
+      "timeout": "{subagent_ttl_ms}",
+      "values": {
+        "claim": "{claim}",
+        "evidence": "Use previous reviewer outputs from stdin and named scope: {scope}. Respect the parallel_status header and verify only against usable reviewer evidence.",
+        "model": "{verifier_model}",
+        "thinking": "{thinking}",
+        "tools": "{tools}",
+        "evidence_policy": "{evidence_policy}"
+      }
+    },
+    {
+      "name": "merger",
+      "timeout": "{subagent_ttl_ms}",
+      "values": {
+        "inputs": "Use previous reviewer and verifier outputs from stdin.",
+        "mode": "consensus-first",
+        "merge_policy": "{merge_policy}",
+        "model": "{merger_model}",
+        "thinking": "{thinking}",
+        "tools": "{tools}",
+        "risk_policy": "{risk_policy}"
+      }
+    },
+    {
+      "name": "judge",
+      "timeout": "{subagent_ttl_ms}",
+      "values": {
+        "report": "Use merged output from stdin.",
+        "evidence": "Use previous reviewer, verifier, and merger outputs from stdin. Preserve complete/degraded/insufficient_data status.",
+        "model": "{judge_model}",
+        "thinking": "{thinking}",
+        "tools": "{tools}"
+      }
+    },
+    {
+      "name": "normalizer",
+      "timeout": "{subagent_ttl_ms}",
+      "values": {
+        "input": "Use merged and judged output from stdin.",
+        "format": "{output_format}",
+        "preservation_policy": "Preserve branch status and explicitly mark Status as complete, degraded, or insufficient_data. Include stable ACTOR_EVIDENCE_REF values from stdin in the Evidence section for every reviewer, verifier, merger, and judge source used. Do not claim complete when any required evidence reference is absent or inconsistent.",
+        "model": "{merger_model}",
+        "thinking": "{thinking}",
+        "tools": "{tools}"
+      }
+    }
+  ]
+}

package/node_modules/@llblab/pi-actors/dist/skills/swarm/recipes/subagent-review.json

@@ -0,0 +1,26 @@
+{
+  "async": true,
+  "args": [
+    "scope:string",
+    "lens:string",
+    "instructions:string",
+    "evidence_policy:string",
+    "risk_policy:string",
+    "output_format:string",
+    "model:string",
+    "thinking:string",
+    "tools:string"
+  ],
+  "defaults": {
+    "lens": "evidence-grounded review",
+    "instructions": "Return findings with evidence, risk, and recommended next action.",
+    "evidence_policy": "Cite inspected files, command output, or explicit uncertainty for every material claim.",
+    "risk_policy": "Preserve minority high-impact risks and separate confirmed issues from hypotheses.",
+    "output_format": "Markdown sections: Findings, Evidence, Risks, Next Actions.",
+    "model": "{current_model}",
+    "thinking": "{current_thinking}",
+    "tools": ""
+  },
+  "accept_output": "review_evidence",
+  "template": "pi -p --model {model} --thinking {thinking} {tools?--tools:--no-tools} {tools} Review {scope} through this lens: {lens}. Instructions: {instructions}. Evidence policy: {evidence_policy}. Risk policy: {risk_policy}. Begin the response with ACTOR_REVIEW_RESULT on its own line. Output format: {output_format}"
+}

package/node_modules/@llblab/pi-actors/dist/skills/swarm/recipes/subagent-task-card.json

@@ -0,0 +1,22 @@
+{
+  "async": true,
+  "args": [
+    "goal:string",
+    "allowed:string",
+    "avoided:string",
+    "checks:string",
+    "handoff_format:string",
+    "model:string",
+    "thinking:string",
+    "tools:string"
+  ],
+  "defaults": {
+    "allowed": "Caller must name allowed files, directories, or logical scope.",
+    "avoided": "Avoid unrelated files, public contracts, generated artifacts, and broad refactors unless explicitly allowed.",
+    "checks": "Name the smallest validation commands or review gates that prove completion.",
+    "handoff_format": "Markdown sections: Task, Allowed Files, Avoid Files, Expected Output, Checks, Handoff Notes.",
+    "thinking": "off",
+    "tools": ""
+  },
+  "template": "pi -p --model {model} --thinking {thinking} {tools?--tools:--no-tools} {tools} Create a bounded implementation task card. Goal: {goal}. Allowed: {allowed}. Avoided: {avoided}. Checks: {checks}. Handoff format: {handoff_format}"
+}

package/node_modules/@llblab/pi-actors/dist/skills/swarm/recipes/subagent-tools.json

@@ -0,0 +1,15 @@
+{
+  "async": true,
+  "args": [
+    "prompt:string",
+    "tools:string",
+    "model:string",
+    "thinking:string",
+    "output_format:string"
+  ],
+  "defaults": {
+    "thinking": "off",
+    "output_format": "Concise Markdown with assumptions and next actions."
+  },
+  "template": "pi -p --model {model} --thinking {thinking} --tools {tools} {prompt}. Output format: {output_format}"
+}

package/node_modules/@llblab/pi-actors/dist/skills/swarm/recipes/subagent-verify.json

@@ -0,0 +1,23 @@
+{
+  "async": true,
+  "args": [
+    "claim:string",
+    "evidence:string",
+    "acceptance:string",
+    "evidence_policy:string",
+    "output_format:string",
+    "model:string",
+    "thinking:string",
+    "tools:string"
+  ],
+  "defaults": {
+    "acceptance": "Separate proven, disproven, unknown, and missing evidence.",
+    "evidence_policy": "Do not infer beyond provided evidence or inspected artifacts.",
+    "output_format": "Markdown sections: Verdict, Evidence, Gaps, Confidence.",
+    "model": "{current_model}",
+    "thinking": "{current_thinking}",
+    "tools": ""
+  },
+  "accept_output": "review_evidence",
+  "template": "pi -p --model {model} --thinking {thinking} {tools?--tools:--no-tools} {tools} Verify this claim against the provided evidence. Claim: {claim}. Evidence or artifact paths: {evidence}. Acceptance: {acceptance}. Evidence policy: {evidence_policy}. Begin the response with ACTOR_REVIEW_RESULT on its own line. Output format: {output_format}"
+}