@lipter7/blueprint 2.0.0

package/commands/bp/check-todos.md

@@ -0,0 +1,41 @@
+---
+name: gsd:check-todos
+description: List pending todos and select one to work on
+argument-hint: [area filter]
+allowed-tools:
+  - Read
+  - Write
+  - Bash
+  - AskUserQuestion
+---
+
+<objective>
+List all pending todos, allow selection, load full context for the selected todo, and route to appropriate action.
+
+Routes to the check-todos workflow which handles:
+- Todo counting and listing with area filtering
+- Interactive selection with full context loading
+- Roadmap correlation checking
+- Action routing (work now, add to phase, brainstorm, create phase)
+- STATE.md updates and git commits
+</objective>
+
+<execution_context>
+@.blueprint/STATE.md
+@.blueprint/ROADMAP.md
+@~/.claude/blueprint/workflows/check-todos.md
+</execution_context>
+
+<process>
+**Follow the check-todos workflow** from `@~/.claude/blueprint/workflows/check-todos.md`.
+
+The workflow handles all logic including:
+1. Todo existence checking
+2. Area filtering
+3. Interactive listing and selection
+4. Full context loading with file summaries
+5. Roadmap correlation checking
+6. Action offering and execution
+7. STATE.md updates
+8. Git commits
+</process>

package/commands/bp/complete-milestone.md

@@ -0,0 +1,136 @@
+---
+type: prompt
+name: gsd:complete-milestone
+description: Archive completed milestone and prepare for next version
+argument-hint: <version>
+allowed-tools:
+  - Read
+  - Write
+  - Bash
+---
+
+<objective>
+Mark milestone {{version}} complete, archive to milestones/, and update ROADMAP.md and REQUIREMENTS.md.
+
+Purpose: Create historical record of shipped version, archive milestone artifacts (roadmap + requirements), and prepare for next milestone.
+Output: Milestone archived (roadmap + requirements), PROJECT.md evolved, git tagged.
+</objective>
+
+<execution_context>
+**Load these files NOW (before proceeding):**
+
+- @~/.claude/blueprint/workflows/complete-milestone.md (main workflow)
+- @~/.claude/blueprint/templates/milestone-archive.md (archive template)
+  </execution_context>
+
+<context>
+**Project files:**
+- `.blueprint/ROADMAP.md`
+- `.blueprint/REQUIREMENTS.md`
+- `.blueprint/STATE.md`
+- `.blueprint/PROJECT.md`
+
+**User input:**
+
+- Version: {{version}} (e.g., "1.0", "1.1", "2.0")
+  </context>
+
+<process>
+
+**Follow complete-milestone.md workflow:**
+
+0. **Check for audit:**
+
+   - Look for `.blueprint/v{{version}}-MILESTONE-AUDIT.md`
+   - If missing or stale: recommend `/bp:audit-milestone` first
+   - If audit status is `gaps_found`: recommend `/bp:plan-milestone-gaps` first
+   - If audit status is `passed`: proceed to step 1
+
+   ```markdown
+   ## Pre-flight Check
+
+   {If no v{{version}}-MILESTONE-AUDIT.md:}
+   ⚠ No milestone audit found. Run `/bp:audit-milestone` first to verify
+   requirements coverage, cross-phase integration, and E2E flows.
+
+   {If audit has gaps:}
+   ⚠ Milestone audit found gaps. Run `/bp:plan-milestone-gaps` to create
+   phases that close the gaps, or proceed anyway to accept as tech debt.
+
+   {If audit passed:}
+   ✓ Milestone audit passed. Proceeding with completion.
+   ```
+
+1. **Verify readiness:**
+
+   - Check all phases in milestone have completed plans (SUMMARY.md exists)
+   - Present milestone scope and stats
+   - Wait for confirmation
+
+2. **Gather stats:**
+
+   - Count phases, plans, tasks
+   - Calculate git range, file changes, LOC
+   - Extract timeline from git log
+   - Present summary, confirm
+
+3. **Extract accomplishments:**
+
+   - Read all phase SUMMARY.md files in milestone range
+   - Extract 4-6 key accomplishments
+   - Present for approval
+
+4. **Archive milestone:**
+
+   - Create `.blueprint/milestones/v{{version}}-ROADMAP.md`
+   - Extract full phase details from ROADMAP.md
+   - Fill milestone-archive.md template
+   - Update ROADMAP.md to one-line summary with link
+
+5. **Archive requirements:**
+
+   - Create `.blueprint/milestones/v{{version}}-REQUIREMENTS.md`
+   - Mark all v1 requirements as complete (checkboxes checked)
+   - Note requirement outcomes (validated, adjusted, dropped)
+   - Delete `.blueprint/REQUIREMENTS.md` (fresh one created for next milestone)
+
+6. **Update PROJECT.md:**
+
+   - Add "Current State" section with shipped version
+   - Add "Next Milestone Goals" section
+   - Archive previous content in `<details>` (if v1.1+)
+
+7. **Commit and tag:**
+
+   - Stage: MILESTONES.md, PROJECT.md, ROADMAP.md, STATE.md, archive files
+   - Commit: `chore: archive v{{version}} milestone`
+   - Tag: `git tag -a v{{version}} -m "[milestone summary]"`
+   - Ask about pushing tag
+
+8. **Offer next steps:**
+   - `/bp:new-milestone` — start next milestone (questioning → research → requirements → roadmap)
+
+</process>
+
+<success_criteria>
+
+- Milestone archived to `.blueprint/milestones/v{{version}}-ROADMAP.md`
+- Requirements archived to `.blueprint/milestones/v{{version}}-REQUIREMENTS.md`
+- `.blueprint/REQUIREMENTS.md` deleted (fresh for next milestone)
+- ROADMAP.md collapsed to one-line entry
+- PROJECT.md updated with current state
+- Git tag v{{version}} created
+- Commit successful
+- User knows next steps (including need for fresh requirements)
+  </success_criteria>
+
+<critical_rules>
+
+- **Load workflow first:** Read complete-milestone.md before executing
+- **Verify completion:** All phases must have SUMMARY.md files
+- **User confirmation:** Wait for approval at verification gates
+- **Archive before deleting:** Always create archive files before updating/deleting originals
+- **One-line summary:** Collapsed milestone in ROADMAP.md should be single line with link
+- **Context efficiency:** Archive keeps ROADMAP.md and REQUIREMENTS.md constant size per milestone
+- **Fresh requirements:** Next milestone starts with `/bp:new-milestone` which includes requirements definition
+  </critical_rules>

package/commands/bp/debug.md

@@ -0,0 +1,162 @@
+---
+name: gsd:debug
+description: Systematic debugging with persistent state across context resets
+argument-hint: [issue description]
+allowed-tools:
+  - Read
+  - Bash
+  - Task
+  - AskUserQuestion
+---
+
+<objective>
+Debug issues using scientific method with subagent isolation.
+
+**Orchestrator role:** Gather symptoms, spawn bp-debugger agent, handle checkpoints, spawn continuations.
+
+**Why subagent:** Investigation burns context fast (reading files, forming hypotheses, testing). Fresh 200k context per investigation. Main context stays lean for user interaction.
+</objective>
+
+<context>
+User's issue: $ARGUMENTS
+
+Check for active sessions:
+```bash
+ls .blueprint/debug/*.md 2>/dev/null | grep -v resolved | head -5
+```
+</context>
+
+<process>
+
+## 0. Initialize Context
+
+```bash
+INIT=$(node ~/.claude/blueprint/bin/blueprint-tools.js state load)
+```
+
+Extract `commit_docs` from init JSON. Resolve debugger model:
+```bash
+DEBUGGER_MODEL=$(node ~/.claude/blueprint/bin/blueprint-tools.js resolve-model bp-debugger --raw)
+```
+
+## 1. Check Active Sessions
+
+If active sessions exist AND no $ARGUMENTS:
+- List sessions with status, hypothesis, next action
+- User picks number to resume OR describes new issue
+
+If $ARGUMENTS provided OR user describes new issue:
+- Continue to symptom gathering
+
+## 2. Gather Symptoms (if new issue)
+
+Use AskUserQuestion for each:
+
+1. **Expected behavior** - What should happen?
+2. **Actual behavior** - What happens instead?
+3. **Error messages** - Any errors? (paste or describe)
+4. **Timeline** - When did this start? Ever worked?
+5. **Reproduction** - How do you trigger it?
+
+After all gathered, confirm ready to investigate.
+
+## 3. Spawn bp-debugger Agent
+
+Fill prompt and spawn:
+
+```markdown
+<objective>
+Investigate issue: {slug}
+
+**Summary:** {trigger}
+</objective>
+
+<symptoms>
+expected: {expected}
+actual: {actual}
+errors: {errors}
+reproduction: {reproduction}
+timeline: {timeline}
+</symptoms>
+
+<mode>
+symptoms_prefilled: true
+goal: find_and_fix
+</mode>
+
+<debug_file>
+Create: .blueprint/debug/{slug}.md
+</debug_file>
+```
+
+```
+Task(
+  prompt=filled_prompt,
+  subagent_type="bp-debugger",
+  model="{debugger_model}",
+  description="Debug {slug}"
+)
+```
+
+## 4. Handle Agent Return
+
+**If `## ROOT CAUSE FOUND`:**
+- Display root cause and evidence summary
+- Offer options:
+  - "Fix now" - spawn fix subagent
+  - "Plan fix" - suggest /bp:plan-phase --gaps
+  - "Manual fix" - done
+
+**If `## CHECKPOINT REACHED`:**
+- Present checkpoint details to user
+- Get user response
+- Spawn continuation agent (see step 5)
+
+**If `## INVESTIGATION INCONCLUSIVE`:**
+- Show what was checked and eliminated
+- Offer options:
+  - "Continue investigating" - spawn new agent with additional context
+  - "Manual investigation" - done
+  - "Add more context" - gather more symptoms, spawn again
+
+## 5. Spawn Continuation Agent (After Checkpoint)
+
+When user responds to checkpoint, spawn fresh agent:
+
+```markdown
+<objective>
+Continue debugging {slug}. Evidence is in the debug file.
+</objective>
+
+<prior_state>
+Debug file: @.blueprint/debug/{slug}.md
+</prior_state>
+
+<checkpoint_response>
+**Type:** {checkpoint_type}
+**Response:** {user_response}
+</checkpoint_response>
+
+<mode>
+goal: find_and_fix
+</mode>
+```
+
+```
+Task(
+  prompt=continuation_prompt,
+  subagent_type="bp-debugger",
+  model="{debugger_model}",
+  description="Continue debug {slug}"
+)
+```
+
+</process>
+
+<success_criteria>
+- [ ] Active sessions checked
+- [ ] Symptoms gathered (if new)
+- [ ] bp-debugger spawned with context
+- [ ] Checkpoints handled correctly
+- [ ] Root cause confirmed before fixing
+</success_criteria>

package/commands/bp/discuss-phase.md

@@ -0,0 +1,86 @@
+---
+name: gsd:discuss-phase
+description: Gather phase context through adaptive questioning before planning
+argument-hint: "<phase>"
+allowed-tools:
+  - Read
+  - Write
+  - Bash
+  - Glob
+  - Grep
+  - AskUserQuestion
+---
+
+<objective>
+Extract implementation decisions that downstream agents need — researcher and planner will use CONTEXT.md to know what to investigate and what choices are locked.
+
+**How it works:**
+1. Analyze the phase to identify gray areas (UI, UX, behavior, etc.)
+2. Present gray areas — user selects which to discuss
+3. Deep-dive each selected area until satisfied
+4. Create CONTEXT.md with decisions that guide research and planning
+
+**Output:** `{phase}-CONTEXT.md` — decisions clear enough that downstream agents can act without asking the user again
+</objective>
+
+<execution_context>
+@~/.claude/blueprint/workflows/discuss-phase.md
+@~/.claude/blueprint/templates/context.md
+</execution_context>
+
+<context>
+Phase number: $ARGUMENTS (required)
+
+**Load project state:**
+@.blueprint/STATE.md
+
+**Load roadmap:**
+@.blueprint/ROADMAP.md
+</context>
+
+<process>
+1. Validate phase number (error if missing or not in roadmap)
+2. Check if CONTEXT.md exists (offer update/view/skip if yes)
+3. **Analyze phase** — Identify domain and generate phase-specific gray areas
+4. **Present gray areas** — Multi-select: which to discuss? (NO skip option)
+5. **Deep-dive each area** — 4 questions per area, then offer more/next
+6. **Write CONTEXT.md** — Sections match areas discussed
+7. Offer next steps (research or plan)
+
+**CRITICAL: Scope guardrail**
+- Phase boundary from ROADMAP.md is FIXED
+- Discussion clarifies HOW to implement, not WHETHER to add more
+- If user suggests new capabilities: "That's its own phase. I'll note it for later."
+- Capture deferred ideas — don't lose them, don't act on them
+
+**Domain-aware gray areas:**
+Gray areas depend on what's being built. Analyze the phase goal:
+- Something users SEE → layout, density, interactions, states
+- Something users CALL → responses, errors, auth, versioning
+- Something users RUN → output format, flags, modes, error handling
+- Something users READ → structure, tone, depth, flow
+- Something being ORGANIZED → criteria, grouping, naming, exceptions
+
+Generate 3-4 **phase-specific** gray areas, not generic categories.
+
+**Probing depth:**
+- Ask 4 questions per area before checking
+- "More questions about [area], or move to next?"
+- If more → ask 4 more, check again
+- After all areas → "Ready to create context?"
+
+**Do NOT ask about (Claude handles these):**
+- Technical implementation
+- Architecture choices
+- Performance concerns
+- Scope expansion
+</process>
+
+<success_criteria>
+- Gray areas identified through intelligent analysis
+- User chose which areas to discuss
+- Each selected area explored until satisfied
+- Scope creep redirected to deferred ideas
+- CONTEXT.md captures decisions, not vague vision
+- User knows next steps
+</success_criteria>

package/commands/bp/execute-phase.md

@@ -0,0 +1,42 @@
+---
+name: gsd:execute-phase
+description: Execute all plans in a phase with wave-based parallelization
+argument-hint: "<phase-number> [--gaps-only]"
+allowed-tools:
+  - Read
+  - Write
+  - Edit
+  - Glob
+  - Grep
+  - Bash
+  - Task
+  - TodoWrite
+  - AskUserQuestion
+---
+<objective>
+Execute all plans in a phase using wave-based parallel execution.
+
+Orchestrator stays lean: discover plans, analyze dependencies, group into waves, spawn subagents, collect results. Each subagent loads the full execute-plan context and handles its own plan.
+
+Context budget: ~15% orchestrator, 100% fresh per subagent.
+</objective>
+
+<execution_context>
+@~/.claude/blueprint/workflows/execute-phase.md
+@~/.claude/blueprint/references/ui-brand.md
+</execution_context>
+
+<context>
+Phase: $ARGUMENTS
+
+**Flags:**
+- `--gaps-only` — Execute only gap closure plans (plans with `gap_closure: true` in frontmatter). Use after verify-work creates fix plans.
+
+@.blueprint/ROADMAP.md
+@.blueprint/STATE.md
+</context>
+
+<process>
+Execute the execute-phase workflow from @~/.claude/blueprint/workflows/execute-phase.md end-to-end.
+Preserve all workflow gates (wave execution, checkpoint handling, verification, state updates, routing).
+</process>

package/commands/bp/help.md

@@ -0,0 +1,22 @@
+---
+name: gsd:help
+description: Show available Blueprint commands and usage guide
+---
+<objective>
+Display the complete Blueprint command reference.
+
+Output ONLY the reference content below. Do NOT add:
+- Project-specific analysis
+- Git status or file context
+- Next-step suggestions
+- Any commentary beyond the reference
+</objective>
+
+<execution_context>
+@~/.claude/blueprint/workflows/help.md
+</execution_context>
+
+<process>
+Output the complete Blueprint command reference from @~/.claude/blueprint/workflows/help.md.
+Display the reference content directly — no additions or modifications.
+</process>

package/commands/bp/insert-phase.md

@@ -0,0 +1,33 @@
+---
+name: gsd:insert-phase
+description: Insert urgent work as decimal phase (e.g., 72.1) between existing phases
+argument-hint: <after> <description>
+allowed-tools:
+  - Read
+  - Write
+  - Bash
+---
+
+<objective>
+Insert a decimal phase for urgent work discovered mid-milestone that must be completed between existing integer phases.
+
+Uses decimal numbering (72.1, 72.2, etc.) to preserve the logical sequence of planned phases while accommodating urgent insertions.
+
+Purpose: Handle urgent work discovered during execution without renumbering entire roadmap.
+</objective>
+
+<execution_context>
+@~/.claude/blueprint/workflows/insert-phase.md
+</execution_context>
+
+<context>
+Arguments: $ARGUMENTS (format: <after-phase-number> <description>)
+
+@.blueprint/ROADMAP.md
+@.blueprint/STATE.md
+</context>
+
+<process>
+Execute the insert-phase workflow from @~/.claude/blueprint/workflows/insert-phase.md end-to-end.
+Preserve all validation gates (argument parsing, phase verification, decimal calculation, roadmap updates).
+</process>

package/commands/bp/join-discord.md

@@ -0,0 +1,18 @@
+---
+name: gsd:join-discord
+description: Join the Blueprint Discord community
+---
+
+<objective>
+Display the Discord invite link for the Blueprint community server.
+</objective>
+
+<output>
+# Join the Blueprint Discord
+
+Connect with other Blueprint users, get help, share what you're building, and stay updated.
+
+**Invite link:** https://discord.gg/5JJgD5svVS
+
+Click the link or paste it into your browser to join.
+</output>

package/commands/bp/list-phase-assumptions.md

@@ -0,0 +1,50 @@
+---
+name: gsd:list-phase-assumptions
+description: Surface Claude's assumptions about a phase approach before planning
+argument-hint: "[phase]"
+allowed-tools:
+  - Read
+  - Bash
+  - Grep
+  - Glob
+---
+
+<objective>
+Analyze a phase and present Claude's assumptions about technical approach, implementation order, scope boundaries, risk areas, and dependencies.
+
+Purpose: Help users see what Claude thinks BEFORE planning begins - enabling course correction early when assumptions are wrong.
+Output: Conversational output only (no file creation) - ends with "What do you think?" prompt
+</objective>
+
+<execution_context>
+@~/.claude/blueprint/workflows/list-phase-assumptions.md
+</execution_context>
+
+<context>
+Phase number: $ARGUMENTS (required)
+
+**Load project state first:**
+@.blueprint/STATE.md
+
+**Load roadmap:**
+@.blueprint/ROADMAP.md
+</context>
+
+<process>
+1. Validate phase number argument (error if missing or invalid)
+2. Check if phase exists in roadmap
+3. Follow list-phase-assumptions.md workflow:
+   - Analyze roadmap description
+   - Surface assumptions about: technical approach, implementation order, scope, risks, dependencies
+   - Present assumptions clearly
+   - Prompt "What do you think?"
+4. Gather feedback and offer next steps
+</process>
+
+<success_criteria>
+
+- Phase validated against roadmap
+- Assumptions surfaced across five areas
+- User prompted for feedback
+- User knows next steps (discuss context, plan phase, or correct assumptions)
+  </success_criteria>

package/commands/bp/map-codebase.md

@@ -0,0 +1,71 @@
+---
+name: gsd:map-codebase
+description: Analyze codebase with parallel mapper agents to produce .blueprint/codebase/ documents
+argument-hint: "[optional: specific area to map, e.g., 'api' or 'auth']"
+allowed-tools:
+  - Read
+  - Bash
+  - Glob
+  - Grep
+  - Write
+  - Task
+---
+
+<objective>
+Analyze existing codebase using parallel bp-codebase-mapper agents to produce structured codebase documents.
+
+Each mapper agent explores a focus area and **writes documents directly** to `.blueprint/codebase/`. The orchestrator only receives confirmations, keeping context usage minimal.
+
+Output: .blueprint/codebase/ folder with 7 structured documents about the codebase state.
+</objective>
+
+<execution_context>
+@~/.claude/blueprint/workflows/map-codebase.md
+</execution_context>
+
+<context>
+Focus area: $ARGUMENTS (optional - if provided, tells agents to focus on specific subsystem)
+
+**Load project state if exists:**
+Check for .blueprint/STATE.md - loads context if project already initialized
+
+**This command can run:**
+- Before /bp:new-project (brownfield codebases) - creates codebase map first
+- After /bp:new-project (greenfield codebases) - updates codebase map as code evolves
+- Anytime to refresh codebase understanding
+</context>
+
+<when_to_use>
+**Use map-codebase for:**
+- Brownfield projects before initialization (understand existing code first)
+- Refreshing codebase map after significant changes
+- Onboarding to an unfamiliar codebase
+- Before major refactoring (understand current state)
+- When STATE.md references outdated codebase info
+
+**Skip map-codebase for:**
+- Greenfield projects with no code yet (nothing to map)
+- Trivial codebases (<5 files)
+</when_to_use>
+
+<process>
+1. Check if .blueprint/codebase/ already exists (offer to refresh or skip)
+2. Create .blueprint/codebase/ directory structure
+3. Spawn 4 parallel bp-codebase-mapper agents:
+   - Agent 1: tech focus → writes STACK.md, INTEGRATIONS.md
+   - Agent 2: arch focus → writes ARCHITECTURE.md, STRUCTURE.md
+   - Agent 3: quality focus → writes CONVENTIONS.md, TESTING.md
+   - Agent 4: concerns focus → writes CONCERNS.md
+4. Wait for agents to complete, collect confirmations (NOT document contents)
+5. Verify all 7 documents exist with line counts
+6. Commit codebase map
+7. Offer next steps (typically: /bp:new-project or /bp:plan-phase)
+</process>
+
+<success_criteria>
+- [ ] .blueprint/codebase/ directory created
+- [ ] All 7 codebase documents written by mapper agents
+- [ ] Documents follow template structure
+- [ ] Parallel agents completed without errors
+- [ ] User knows next steps
+</success_criteria>