@lingjingai/scriptctl 0.65.3 → 0.65.5
This diff represents the content of publicly available package versions that have been released to one of the supported registries. The information contained in this diff is provided for informational purposes only and reflects changes between package versions as they appear in their respective public registries.
- package/changes/0.65.4.md +13 -0
- package/changes/0.65.5.md +32 -0
- package/dist/bin.js +1 -1
- package/dist/{chunk-TPKRTUVV.js → chunk-AMHE5YHV.js} +115 -114
- package/dist/cli.d.ts +1 -0
- package/dist/cli.js +1 -1
- package/dist/review-agent.js +263 -229
- package/package.json +1 -1
- package/skills/scriptctl/SKILL.md +4 -3
|
@@ -0,0 +1,32 @@
|
|
|
1
|
+
# 0.65.5
|
|
2
|
+
|
|
3
|
+
## Added
|
|
4
|
+
- `synopsis generate --model <profile>` keeps an explicitly selected model profile across chunk, episode, arc and whole-script summaries.
|
|
5
|
+
|
|
6
|
+
## Changed
|
|
7
|
+
- Final reskin review saves the current plan version before independent readback so the audit content hash binds the delivered script.
|
|
8
|
+
- Planning tools apply explicit episode assignments to sourced beats and reorder existing events through `after`, preserving their identities and source mappings. Revision instructions route these structural changes to the owning planning stages.
|
|
9
|
+
- Reskin convergence independently reads the actual manuscript in continuous stage groups, repairs substantive findings, and reads back the result in fresh contexts. Its review agent can return evidence to the saved planning flow; changed design rechecks dependent events and beats, then reviews affected episodes and their downstream ledgers in order. Revision work and independent reading reports persist for continuation.
|
|
10
|
+
- Planning rechecks can amend upstream design; user decisions are reserved for conflicting requirements and creative choices that the supplied brief cannot resolve. Automatic review retains unfinished evidence when its bounded revision rounds do not converge.
|
|
11
|
+
- `reskin direction` reports its current suitability assessment, and `reskin plan` independently reviews target-market identities and new-world causal rules before completing the overall checkpoint. Source facts and candidate suggestions are interpreted through the target world's rules; structural checks remain distinct from content review.
|
|
12
|
+
- Reskin planning treats candidate actions and numbers as design proposals, derives the final implementation from the selected setting and user requirements, and preserves genre-appropriate spectacle while keeping the basic causal process coherent. A separate call derives basic domain knowledge from the target setting without reading proposed story rules. Independent critique identifies substantive causal errors before the editor revises the overall plan or verifies the finished events. Source mapping stays with the adaptation planning stages.
|
|
13
|
+
- `reskin write` runs one ordered chain per plan stage, with up to 6 chains at once by default. `--review-model <profile>` reviews each written episode and passes its cumulative ledger to the next; continuation skips completed writing and review, and stops only the chain whose episode fails. Progress reports `prepared.chains` and `episode-reviewed` alongside writing and review events.
|
|
14
|
+
- `reskin review --converge-only` checks stage-opening seams and reconciles the series using stage-end ledgers. Episode and series checks include estimated duration and quoted Chinese screen text for Latin-script dialogue plans.
|
|
15
|
+
- `reskin write` fills main-character roles from the planned character identities.
|
|
16
|
+
- Character design carries the source character's dramatic appeal and romantic function into the target-market appearance, alongside their profession and story circumstances.
|
|
17
|
+
- Reskin domain references and causal critique distinguish the deadline to start an action from the time allowed to finish it, and derive last-chance stakes from the target setting's actual remaining opportunities.
|
|
18
|
+
- Independent critique of a finished reskin plan reads each stage's detailed beats through a read-only tool, so causal errors in scene-level actions and character judgments are visible alongside event summaries.
|
|
19
|
+
- Planning, writing and review carry culturally specific forms of address through their relationship and emotional roles, with consistent target-language phrasing from setup to payoff.
|
|
20
|
+
|
|
21
|
+
## Fixed
|
|
22
|
+
- Official Gemini text and structured-tool requests use its OpenAI compatibility endpoint, and count cached input within total prompt tokens.
|
|
23
|
+
- Reskin CLI and batch completion retain failed global units even when earlier convergence units passed.
|
|
24
|
+
- Episode review uses planned beats for neighbours that have not been rewritten yet, keeping source placeholder synopses out of new-story continuity context.
|
|
25
|
+
- Character references preserve look names containing parentheses, so writing binds the existing character rather than creating a blank duplicate.
|
|
26
|
+
|
|
27
|
+
## Breaking
|
|
28
|
+
- None.
|
|
29
|
+
## 审核续跑
|
|
30
|
+
|
|
31
|
+
- `review --resume-log <日志>` 读取同一剧本已落盘的审核单元记录,支持按时间先后传入多份日志。已完成分集与未受影响的资产单元保留,失败单元及未解决的全剧交接继续执行;身份回改涉及的资产重新核对。
|
|
32
|
+
- 全剧身份核对按同一问题汇总跨集上报,在身份阶段完成新人物、造型状态及引用迁移。
|
package/dist/bin.js
CHANGED
|
@@ -1,2 +1,2 @@
|
|
|
1
1
|
#!/usr/bin/env node
|
|
2
|
-
import{b as s}from"./chunk-
|
|
2
|
+
import{b as s}from"./chunk-AMHE5YHV.js";import{Console as r}from"node:console";var o=new r({stdout:process.stderr,stderr:process.stderr});console.debug=o.debug.bind(o);console.info=o.info.bind(o);console.log=o.log.bind(o);s(process.argv.slice(2)).then(e=>{process.exitCode=e}).catch(e=>{console.error(e),process.exitCode=70});
|