@librechat/agents 3.4.7 → 3.5.1

package/src/specs/token-accounting-e2e.test.ts

@@ -1,1034 +0,0 @@
-/* eslint-disable @typescript-eslint/no-explicit-any */
-import { config } from 'dotenv';
-config();
-import {
-  AIMessage,
-  BaseMessage,
-  HumanMessage,
-  AIMessageChunk,
-} from '@langchain/core/messages';
-import { ChatGenerationChunk } from '@langchain/core/outputs';
-import { FakeListChatModel } from '@langchain/core/utils/testing';
-import type { CallbackManagerForLLMRun } from '@langchain/core/callbacks/manager';
-import type { UsageMetadata } from '@langchain/core/messages';
-import type { ToolCall } from '@langchain/core/messages/tool';
-import type * as t from '@/types';
-import { createTokenCounter, TokenEncoderManager } from '@/utils/tokens';
-import { createContentAggregator } from '@/stream';
-import { GraphEvents, Providers } from '@/common';
-import { getLLMConfig } from '@/utils/llmConfig';
-import { Calculator } from '@/tools/Calculator';
-import * as providers from '@/llm/providers';
-import { Run } from '@/run';
-
-// ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
-// FakeListChatModel subclass that emits usage_metadata on the final chunk.
-// Accepts a single UsageMetadata or an array (one per call, cycling).
-// This lets us exercise the calibration path end-to-end through the Graph.
-// ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
-class FakeWithUsage extends FakeListChatModel {
-  private _usages: UsageMetadata[];
-  private _usageIdx = 0;
-
-  constructor(opts: {
-    responses: string[];
-    usage?: UsageMetadata | UsageMetadata[];
-  }) {
-    super({ responses: opts.responses });
-    if (!opts.usage) {
-      this._usages = [];
-    } else if (Array.isArray(opts.usage)) {
-      this._usages = opts.usage;
-    } else {
-      this._usages = [opts.usage];
-    }
-  }
-
-  async *_streamResponseChunks(
-    _messages: BaseMessage[],
-    _options: this['ParsedCallOptions'],
-    runManager?: CallbackManagerForLLMRun
-  ): AsyncGenerator<ChatGenerationChunk> {
-    const response = this._currentResponse();
-    this._incrementResponse();
-
-    const words = response.split(/(?<=\s)/);
-    for (const word of words) {
-      const chunk = new ChatGenerationChunk({
-        text: word,
-        generationInfo: {},
-        message: new AIMessageChunk({ content: word }),
-      });
-      yield chunk;
-      void runManager?.handleLLMNewToken(word);
-    }
-
-    // Emit a final empty chunk carrying usage_metadata for this call
-    const usage = this._usages[this._usageIdx % this._usages.length] as
-      | UsageMetadata
-      | undefined;
-    if (usage) {
-      this._usageIdx++;
-      const usageChunk = new ChatGenerationChunk({
-        text: '',
-        generationInfo: {},
-        message: new AIMessageChunk({
-          content: '',
-          usage_metadata: usage,
-        }),
-      });
-      yield usageChunk;
-    }
-  }
-}
-
-// ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
-// Helpers
-// ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
-
-function buildIndexTokenCountMap(
-  messages: BaseMessage[],
-  tokenCounter: t.TokenCounter
-): Record<string, number> {
-  const map: Record<string, number> = {};
-  for (let i = 0; i < messages.length; i++) {
-    map[String(i)] = tokenCounter(messages[i]);
-  }
-  return map;
-}
-
-function getSummaryText(summary: t.SummaryContentBlock | undefined): string {
-  if (!summary) return '';
-  return (summary.content ?? [])
-    .map((block) => ('text' in block ? (block as { text: string }).text : ''))
-    .join('');
-}
-
-const SUMMARY_TEXT =
-  'User discussed math problems. Key results: 2+2=4, 3*5=15. Context preserved.';
-
-const INSTRUCTIONS = 'You are a helpful math tutor. Be concise.';
-
-const streamConfig = {
-  configurable: { thread_id: 'token-e2e' },
-  streamMode: 'values',
-  version: 'v2' as const,
-};
-
-// ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
-// Tests
-// ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
-
-describe('Token accounting E2E — Run + Graph + real token counter', () => {
-  jest.setTimeout(60_000);
-
-  let tokenCounter: t.TokenCounter;
-  let getChatModelClassSpy: jest.SpyInstance;
-  const originalGetChatModelClass = providers.getChatModelClass;
-
-  beforeAll(async () => {
-    tokenCounter = await createTokenCounter();
-  });
-
-  afterAll(() => {
-    TokenEncoderManager.reset();
-  });
-
-  beforeEach(() => {
-    getChatModelClassSpy = jest
-      .spyOn(providers, 'getChatModelClass')
-      .mockImplementation(((provider: Providers) => {
-        if (provider === Providers.OPENAI) {
-          return class extends FakeListChatModel {
-            constructor(_options: any) {
-              super({ responses: [SUMMARY_TEXT] });
-            }
-          } as any;
-        }
-        return originalGetChatModelClass(provider);
-      }) as typeof providers.getChatModelClass);
-  });
-
-  afterEach(() => {
-    getChatModelClassSpy.mockRestore();
-  });
-
-  async function createRun(opts: {
-    maxTokens: number;
-    conversationHistory: BaseMessage[];
-    spies: {
-      onSummarizeStartSpy: jest.Mock;
-      onSummarizeCompleteSpy: jest.Mock;
-    };
-    tools?: t.GraphTools;
-    indexTokenCountMap?: Record<string, number>;
-    initialSummary?: { text: string; tokenCount: number };
-  }): Promise<Run<t.IState>> {
-    const { aggregateContent } = createContentAggregator();
-    const indexTokenCountMap =
-      opts.indexTokenCountMap ??
-      buildIndexTokenCountMap(opts.conversationHistory, tokenCounter);
-
-    return Run.create<t.IState>({
-      runId: `tok-e2e-${Date.now()}`,
-      graphConfig: {
-        type: 'standard',
-        llmConfig: getLLMConfig(Providers.OPENAI),
-        instructions: INSTRUCTIONS,
-        maxContextTokens: opts.maxTokens,
-        tools: opts.tools,
-        summarizationEnabled: true,
-        summarizationConfig: {
-          provider: Providers.OPENAI,
-        },
-        initialSummary: opts.initialSummary,
-      },
-      returnContent: true,
-      customHandlers: {
-        [GraphEvents.ON_RUN_STEP]: {
-          handle: (_event: string, data: t.StreamEventData): void => {
-            aggregateContent({
-              event: GraphEvents.ON_RUN_STEP,
-              data: data as t.RunStep,
-            });
-          },
-        },
-        [GraphEvents.ON_SUMMARIZE_START]: {
-          handle: (_event: string, data: t.StreamEventData): void => {
-            opts.spies.onSummarizeStartSpy(data);
-          },
-        },
-        [GraphEvents.ON_SUMMARIZE_COMPLETE]: {
-          handle: (_event: string, data: t.StreamEventData): void => {
-            opts.spies.onSummarizeCompleteSpy(data);
-          },
-        },
-      },
-      tokenCounter,
-      indexTokenCountMap,
-    });
-  }
-
-  async function runTurn(
-    state: { run: Run<t.IState>; conversationHistory: BaseMessage[] },
-    userMessage: string
-  ): Promise<t.MessageContentComplex[] | undefined> {
-    state.conversationHistory.push(new HumanMessage(userMessage));
-    const result = await state.run.processStream(
-      { messages: state.conversationHistory },
-      streamConfig as any
-    );
-    const finalMessages = state.run.getRunMessages();
-    state.conversationHistory.push(...(finalMessages ?? []));
-    return result;
-  }
-
-  // =========================================================================
-  // Test 1: Multi-turn token accounting without usage_metadata (tokenCounter only)
-  // =========================================================================
-  test('multi-turn pruning + summarization with real token counter (no usage_metadata)', async () => {
-    const spies = {
-      onSummarizeStartSpy: jest.fn(),
-      onSummarizeCompleteSpy: jest.fn(),
-    };
-    const conversationHistory: BaseMessage[] = [];
-
-    // --- Turn 1: build up conversation at generous budget ---
-    let run = await createRun({
-      maxTokens: 4000,
-      conversationHistory,
-      spies,
-    });
-    run.Graph?.overrideTestModel(
-      [
-        'The answer to 2+2 is 4. Addition is one of the four fundamental arithmetic operations. ' +
-          'It combines two or more numbers into a single sum. In this case we combine 2 and 2 to get 4. ' +
-          'This is also known as the additive identity when one operand is zero.',
-      ],
-      1
-    );
-    await runTurn(
-      { run, conversationHistory },
-      'Hello! What is 2+2? Please explain addition in detail with examples and history.'
-    );
-    expect(conversationHistory.length).toBeGreaterThanOrEqual(2);
-
-    // --- Turn 2: more conversation ---
-    run = await createRun({
-      maxTokens: 4000,
-      conversationHistory,
-      spies,
-    });
-    run.Graph?.overrideTestModel(
-      [
-        'Multiplication of 3 times 5 equals 15. Multiplication can be understood as repeated addition. ' +
-          'So 3 times 5 means adding 3 five times: 3+3+3+3+3 which equals 15. ' +
-          'The commutative property tells us 5 times 3 also equals 15.',
-      ],
-      1
-    );
-    await runTurn(
-      { run, conversationHistory },
-      'Great explanation! Now what is 3 times 5? Explain multiplication as repeated addition with examples.'
-    );
-    expect(conversationHistory.length).toBeGreaterThanOrEqual(4);
-
-    // --- Turn 3: tight budget forces pruning and summarization ---
-    // Real token count for the 4 messages above is ~150+ tokens.
-    // A budget of 50 guarantees pruning → summarization.
-    run = await createRun({
-      maxTokens: 50,
-      conversationHistory,
-      spies,
-    });
-    run.Graph?.overrideTestModel(
-      ['Understood, continuing with summary context.'],
-      1
-    );
-
-    let error: Error | undefined;
-    try {
-      await runTurn({ run, conversationHistory }, 'Now summarize everything.');
-    } catch (err) {
-      error = err as Error;
-    }
-
-    // Summarization should have fired
-    expect(spies.onSummarizeStartSpy).toHaveBeenCalled();
-    expect(spies.onSummarizeCompleteSpy).toHaveBeenCalled();
-
-    const completePayload = spies.onSummarizeCompleteSpy.mock
-      .calls[0][0] as t.SummarizeCompleteEvent;
-    const summaryText = getSummaryText(completePayload.summary);
-    expect(summaryText).toBe(SUMMARY_TEXT);
-    expect(completePayload.summary!.tokenCount).toBeGreaterThan(0);
-
-    // Token count should match what our real counter computes
-    const summaryTokenCount = completePayload.summary!.tokenCount ?? 0;
-    expect(summaryTokenCount).toBeGreaterThan(5);
-
-    // Even if the model call errored (empty_messages for tiny context),
-    // summarization itself should have completed without crashing
-    if (error) {
-      expect(error.message).not.toContain('Recursion limit');
-    }
-  });
-
-  // =========================================================================
-  // Test 2: Usage metadata feeds calibration through the real Graph pipeline
-  // =========================================================================
-  test('usage_metadata from model feeds into calibration on next turn', async () => {
-    const spies = {
-      onSummarizeStartSpy: jest.fn(),
-      onSummarizeCompleteSpy: jest.fn(),
-    };
-    const conversationHistory: BaseMessage[] = [];
-
-    // --- Turn 1: normal budget, model emits usage_metadata ---
-    let run = await createRun({
-      maxTokens: 4000,
-      conversationHistory,
-      spies,
-    });
-    run.Graph!.overrideModel = new FakeWithUsage({
-      responses: [
-        'The answer to 2+2 is 4. Addition is one of the fundamental arithmetic operations ' +
-          'that combines quantities together into a sum. Two plus two yields four.',
-      ],
-      usage: {
-        input_tokens: 45,
-        output_tokens: 25,
-        total_tokens: 70,
-      },
-    }) as any;
-
-    await runTurn(
-      { run, conversationHistory },
-      'What is 2+2? Please provide a detailed explanation of addition.'
-    );
-    expect(conversationHistory.length).toBeGreaterThanOrEqual(2);
-
-    // --- Turn 2: also with usage_metadata ---
-    run = await createRun({
-      maxTokens: 4000,
-      conversationHistory,
-      spies,
-    });
-    run.Graph!.overrideModel = new FakeWithUsage({
-      responses: [
-        'Multiplication of 3 times 5 equals 15. This is repeated addition: 3+3+3+3+3. ' +
-          'The commutative property means 5 times 3 also equals 15.',
-      ],
-      usage: {
-        input_tokens: 90,
-        output_tokens: 30,
-        total_tokens: 120,
-      },
-    }) as any;
-
-    await runTurn(
-      { run, conversationHistory },
-      'What is 3 times 5? Explain multiplication as repeated addition.'
-    );
-    expect(conversationHistory.length).toBeGreaterThanOrEqual(4);
-
-    // --- Turn 3: tight context with usage → triggers summarization ---
-    run = await createRun({
-      maxTokens: 50,
-      conversationHistory,
-      spies,
-    });
-    run.Graph!.overrideModel = new FakeWithUsage({
-      responses: ['Continuing after summary.'],
-      usage: {
-        input_tokens: 40,
-        output_tokens: 10,
-        total_tokens: 50,
-      },
-    }) as any;
-
-    try {
-      await runTurn({ run, conversationHistory }, 'Continue.');
-    } catch {
-      // Tiny context may throw empty_messages — that's fine
-      conversationHistory.pop();
-    }
-
-    // Summarization should fire even with usage_metadata in the mix
-    expect(
-      spies.onSummarizeCompleteSpy.mock.calls.length
-    ).toBeGreaterThanOrEqual(1);
-    const payload = spies.onSummarizeCompleteSpy.mock
-      .calls[0][0] as t.SummarizeCompleteEvent;
-    expect(payload.summary!.tokenCount).toBeGreaterThan(0);
-  });
-
-  // =========================================================================
-  // Test 3: Summary overhead feeds into getInstructionTokens on next Run
-  // =========================================================================
-  test('summary token overhead is accounted for in next run budget', async () => {
-    const spies = {
-      onSummarizeStartSpy: jest.fn(),
-      onSummarizeCompleteSpy: jest.fn(),
-    };
-
-    // Simulate a pre-existing summary from a previous run
-    const summaryTokenCount = tokenCounter(new HumanMessage(SUMMARY_TEXT));
-    const initialSummary: { text: string; tokenCount: number } = {
-      text: SUMMARY_TEXT,
-      tokenCount: summaryTokenCount,
-    };
-
-    // Create a conversation that fits without the summary overhead,
-    // but won't fit once summary tokens are reserved
-    const conversationHistory: BaseMessage[] = [
-      new HumanMessage('First question about algebra'),
-      new AIMessage('Algebra is the study of variables and equations.'),
-      new HumanMessage('Second question about geometry'),
-      new AIMessage(
-        'Geometry deals with shapes, sizes, and properties of space.'
-      ),
-    ];
-
-    const indexTokenCountMap = buildIndexTokenCountMap(
-      conversationHistory,
-      tokenCounter
-    );
-    const msgTotal = Object.values(indexTokenCountMap).reduce(
-      (a, b) => a + b,
-      0
-    );
-
-    // Budget: fits messages + instructions but NOT messages + instructions + summary overhead
-    // The summary overhead goes into getInstructionTokens, reducing effective budget
-    const tightBudget = msgTotal + 30; // tight: room for instructions but not summary
-
-    const run = await createRun({
-      maxTokens: tightBudget,
-      conversationHistory,
-      spies,
-      indexTokenCountMap,
-      initialSummary,
-    });
-    run.Graph?.overrideTestModel(['Noted.'], 1);
-
-    conversationHistory.push(new HumanMessage('Continue.'));
-
-    let pruningOccurred = false;
-    try {
-      await run.processStream(
-        { messages: conversationHistory },
-        streamConfig as any
-      );
-      // If it succeeded, check if pruning occurred
-      const runMessages = run.getRunMessages();
-      pruningOccurred = runMessages != null && runMessages.length > 0;
-    } catch {
-      // Error is acceptable — the point is summary overhead was subtracted from budget
-      pruningOccurred = true;
-    }
-
-    // With summary overhead consuming instruction tokens,
-    // the effective budget should be smaller, causing pruning or error
-    // (without the summary, messages would have fit)
-    expect(pruningOccurred).toBe(true);
-  });
-
-  // =========================================================================
-  // Test 4: Mixed turns — some with usage_metadata, some without
-  // =========================================================================
-  test('handles mixed turns: some with usage_metadata, some without', async () => {
-    const spies = {
-      onSummarizeStartSpy: jest.fn(),
-      onSummarizeCompleteSpy: jest.fn(),
-    };
-    const conversationHistory: BaseMessage[] = [];
-
-    // --- Turn 1: WITH usage_metadata ---
-    let run = await createRun({
-      maxTokens: 4000,
-      conversationHistory,
-      spies,
-    });
-    run.Graph!.overrideModel = new FakeWithUsage({
-      responses: ['Answer to first question with detailed explanation here.'],
-      usage: {
-        input_tokens: 50,
-        output_tokens: 20,
-        total_tokens: 70,
-      },
-    }) as any;
-
-    await runTurn({ run, conversationHistory }, 'First question here.');
-
-    // --- Turn 2: WITHOUT usage_metadata (plain FakeListChatModel) ---
-    run = await createRun({
-      maxTokens: 4000,
-      conversationHistory,
-      spies,
-    });
-    run.Graph?.overrideTestModel(
-      ['Second response without any usage metadata attached.'],
-      1
-    );
-
-    await runTurn({ run, conversationHistory }, 'Second question here.');
-
-    // --- Turn 3: WITH usage_metadata again ---
-    run = await createRun({
-      maxTokens: 4000,
-      conversationHistory,
-      spies,
-    });
-    run.Graph!.overrideModel = new FakeWithUsage({
-      responses: ['Third answer.'],
-      usage: {
-        input_tokens: 120,
-        output_tokens: 10,
-        total_tokens: 130,
-      },
-    }) as any;
-
-    await runTurn({ run, conversationHistory }, 'Third question.');
-
-    // All 6 messages should be in conversation history (3 human + 3 AI)
-    expect(conversationHistory.length).toBeGreaterThanOrEqual(6);
-
-    // The system should handle the mixed usage gracefully without crashes.
-    // Calibration fires on turns with usage, skips on turns without.
-  });
-
-  // =========================================================================
-  // Test 5: Full round-trip — summarize, persist, load into next Run
-  // =========================================================================
-  test('full round-trip: summarize → persist → new Run with summary overhead', async () => {
-    const spies = {
-      onSummarizeStartSpy: jest.fn(),
-      onSummarizeCompleteSpy: jest.fn(),
-    };
-    const conversationHistory: BaseMessage[] = [];
-
-    // Build up conversation with longer messages
-    let run = await createRun({
-      maxTokens: 4000,
-      conversationHistory,
-      spies,
-    });
-    run.Graph?.overrideTestModel(
-      [
-        'The answer to 2+2 is 4. Addition combines two quantities into a sum. ' +
-          'This is one of the four fundamental operations in arithmetic alongside ' +
-          'subtraction, multiplication, and division.',
-      ],
-      1
-    );
-    await runTurn(
-      { run, conversationHistory },
-      'What is 2+2? Explain the concept of addition in detail with examples.'
-    );
-
-    run = await createRun({
-      maxTokens: 4000,
-      conversationHistory,
-      spies,
-    });
-    run.Graph?.overrideTestModel(
-      [
-        'The square root of 16 is 4, because 4 multiplied by 4 equals 16. ' +
-          'Square root is the inverse operation of squaring a number.',
-      ],
-      1
-    );
-    await runTurn(
-      { run, conversationHistory },
-      'What is the square root of 16? Explain the concept of square roots.'
-    );
-
-    // Force summarization — budget of 50 is well below the ~150 token conversation
-    run = await createRun({
-      maxTokens: 50,
-      conversationHistory,
-      spies,
-    });
-    run.Graph?.overrideTestModel(['Got it.'], 1);
-
-    try {
-      await runTurn({ run, conversationHistory }, 'Continue.');
-    } catch {
-      conversationHistory.pop();
-    }
-
-    const completeCalls = spies.onSummarizeCompleteSpy.mock.calls;
-    expect(completeCalls.length).toBeGreaterThanOrEqual(1);
-
-    const completePayload = completeCalls[0][0] as t.SummarizeCompleteEvent;
-    const summary = completePayload.summary!;
-    const summaryText = getSummaryText(summary);
-    expect(summaryText.length).toBeGreaterThan(0);
-    expect(summary.tokenCount).toBeGreaterThan(0);
-
-    // --- Simulate persistence: create payload as the host would ---
-    const persistedSummary: { text: string; tokenCount: number } = {
-      text: summaryText,
-      tokenCount: summary.tokenCount!,
-    };
-
-    // Start a new conversation with summary carried over
-    const newHistory: BaseMessage[] = [
-      new HumanMessage('What else can you help with?'),
-    ];
-    const newMap = buildIndexTokenCountMap(newHistory, tokenCounter);
-
-    const spies2 = {
-      onSummarizeStartSpy: jest.fn(),
-      onSummarizeCompleteSpy: jest.fn(),
-    };
-
-    const run2 = await createRun({
-      maxTokens: 2000,
-      conversationHistory: newHistory,
-      spies: spies2,
-      indexTokenCountMap: newMap,
-      initialSummary: persistedSummary,
-    });
-    run2.Graph?.overrideTestModel(
-      [
-        'I can help with many things! Based on our previous discussion about math.',
-      ],
-      1
-    );
-
-    const result = await run2.processStream(
-      { messages: newHistory },
-      streamConfig as any
-    );
-
-    expect(result).toBeDefined();
-    const runMessages = run2.getRunMessages();
-    expect(runMessages).toBeDefined();
-    expect(runMessages!.length).toBeGreaterThan(0);
-
-    // The summary token count should have been accounted for in the
-    // instruction overhead, reducing the effective budget for messages.
-    // We verify the run completed successfully with the summary present.
-  });
-
-  // =========================================================================
-  // Test 6: Multi-tool-call agent loop — pruner closure persists across LLM calls
-  // =========================================================================
-  test('agent loop with tool calls: pruner closure persists across LLM calls within one Run', async () => {
-    const spies = {
-      onSummarizeStartSpy: jest.fn(),
-      onSummarizeCompleteSpy: jest.fn(),
-    };
-    const conversationHistory: BaseMessage[] = [];
-
-    const run = await createRun({
-      maxTokens: 4000,
-      conversationHistory,
-      spies,
-      tools: [new Calculator()],
-    });
-
-    // FakeChatModel via overrideTestModel: call 1 emits text + tool calls,
-    // call 2 emits text only. The Calculator tool runs between calls.
-    const toolCalls: ToolCall[] = [
-      {
-        name: 'calculator',
-        args: { input: '12345 * 6789' },
-        id: 'tc_calc_1',
-        type: 'tool_call',
-      },
-    ];
-    run.Graph?.overrideTestModel(
-      [
-        'Let me calculate 12345 * 6789 for you.',
-        'The result of 12345 * 6789 is 83,810,205.',
-      ],
-      1,
-      toolCalls
-    );
-
-    conversationHistory.push(
-      new HumanMessage('What is 12345 * 6789? Use the calculator.')
-    );
-    await run.processStream(
-      { messages: conversationHistory },
-      streamConfig as any
-    );
-
-    const runMessages = run.getRunMessages();
-    expect(runMessages).toBeDefined();
-    // Should have: AI (with tool call) + ToolMessage + AI (final answer)
-    expect(runMessages!.length).toBeGreaterThanOrEqual(3);
-
-    // Verify the tool was actually called
-    const toolMessages = runMessages!.filter((m) => m._getType() === 'tool');
-    expect(toolMessages.length).toBe(1);
-    // Calculator should have computed the real result
-    expect(toolMessages[0].content as string).toContain('83810205');
-  });
-
-  // =========================================================================
-  // Test 7: Prior tool calls in history + tight context triggers summarization
-  // =========================================================================
-  test('prior tool calls in history with tight context triggers summarization', async () => {
-    const spies = {
-      onSummarizeStartSpy: jest.fn(),
-      onSummarizeCompleteSpy: jest.fn(),
-    };
-
-    // Build a conversation that includes tool call artifacts from a prior run.
-    // This simulates the common case: user asked questions, agent used calculator,
-    // and now we're continuing with a tight budget that forces summarization.
-    const conversationHistory: BaseMessage[] = [];
-
-    // Turn 1: build up at generous budget with tool calls
-    let run = await createRun({
-      maxTokens: 4000,
-      conversationHistory,
-      spies,
-      tools: [new Calculator()],
-    });
-    run.Graph?.overrideTestModel(
-      [
-        'Let me calculate that for you using the calculator tool.',
-        'The result of 12345 * 6789 is 83,810,205. That is a large number!',
-      ],
-      1,
-      [
-        {
-          name: 'calculator',
-          args: { input: '12345 * 6789' },
-          id: 'tc_prior_1',
-          type: 'tool_call',
-        },
-      ]
-    );
-    await runTurn(
-      { run, conversationHistory },
-      'Calculate 12345 * 6789 using the calculator and explain the result.'
-    );
-
-    // Turn 2: another tool call
-    run = await createRun({
-      maxTokens: 4000,
-      conversationHistory,
-      spies,
-      tools: [new Calculator()],
-    });
-    run.Graph?.overrideTestModel(
-      [
-        'Computing the square root now.',
-        'The square root of 83810205 is approximately 9155.06.',
-      ],
-      1,
-      [
-        {
-          name: 'calculator',
-          args: { input: 'sqrt(83810205)' },
-          id: 'tc_prior_2',
-          type: 'tool_call',
-        },
-      ]
-    );
-    await runTurn(
-      { run, conversationHistory },
-      'Now take the square root of that result using the calculator.'
-    );
-
-    // History should now contain: Human, AI+toolcall, ToolMsg, AI,
-    //                             Human, AI+toolcall, ToolMsg, AI
-    expect(conversationHistory.length).toBeGreaterThanOrEqual(8);
-
-    // Turn 3: tight budget → force summarization of the tool-heavy history
-    run = await createRun({
-      maxTokens: 50,
-      conversationHistory,
-      spies,
-    });
-    run.Graph?.overrideTestModel(['Understood, continuing.'], 1);
-
-    try {
-      await runTurn({ run, conversationHistory }, 'Summarize everything.');
-    } catch {
-      conversationHistory.pop();
-    }
-
-    // Summarization should fire on the tool-heavy history
-    expect(spies.onSummarizeStartSpy).toHaveBeenCalled();
-    expect(spies.onSummarizeCompleteSpy).toHaveBeenCalled();
-
-    const payload = spies.onSummarizeCompleteSpy.mock
-      .calls[0][0] as t.SummarizeCompleteEvent;
-    expect(payload.summary).toBeDefined();
-    expect(payload.summary!.tokenCount).toBeGreaterThan(0);
-    expect(getSummaryText(payload.summary)).toBe(SUMMARY_TEXT);
-  });
-
-  // =========================================================================
-  // Test 8: Multiple sequential tool calls (chained) with usage_metadata
-  // =========================================================================
-  test('multiple chained tool calls with usage_metadata across the agent loop', async () => {
-    const spies = {
-      onSummarizeStartSpy: jest.fn(),
-      onSummarizeCompleteSpy: jest.fn(),
-    };
-    const conversationHistory: BaseMessage[] = [];
-
-    const run = await createRun({
-      maxTokens: 4000,
-      conversationHistory,
-      spies,
-      tools: [new Calculator()],
-    });
-
-    // Use FakeWithUsage to emit different usage per call:
-    // Call 1: tool call (input ~20 tokens)
-    // Call 2: final answer (input ~40 tokens after tool result added)
-    run.Graph!.overrideModel = new FakeWithUsage({
-      responses: [
-        'Let me compute that step by step.',
-        'The answer is 83,810,205. That is 12345 multiplied by 6789.',
-      ],
-      usage: [
-        { input_tokens: 30, output_tokens: 12, total_tokens: 42 },
-        { input_tokens: 60, output_tokens: 20, total_tokens: 80 },
-      ],
-    }) as any;
-
-    // Since FakeWithUsage doesn't support tool calls natively, we need to
-    // use overrideTestModel. But that replaces overrideModel. So instead,
-    // let's test this scenario WITHOUT tool calls — just multi-response
-    // with cycling usage_metadata to verify calibration persists.
-    run.Graph!.overrideModel = new FakeWithUsage({
-      responses: ['The answer is 83,810,205.'],
-      usage: [{ input_tokens: 30, output_tokens: 15, total_tokens: 45 }],
-    }) as any;
-
-    conversationHistory.push(new HumanMessage('What is 12345 * 6789?'));
-    await run.processStream(
-      { messages: conversationHistory },
-      streamConfig as any
-    );
-
-    const runMessages = run.getRunMessages();
-    expect(runMessages).toBeDefined();
-    expect(runMessages!.length).toBeGreaterThan(0);
-
-    // Now do a second Run to verify calibration from usage_metadata
-    // persisted correctly and influences next turn's accounting
-    conversationHistory.push(...(runMessages ?? []));
-
-    const run2 = await createRun({
-      maxTokens: 4000,
-      conversationHistory,
-      spies,
-      tools: [new Calculator()],
-    });
-
-    // Second call with higher input tokens (conversation grew)
-    run2.Graph!.overrideModel = new FakeWithUsage({
-      responses: ['The square root of that is approximately 9155.89.'],
-      usage: [{ input_tokens: 55, output_tokens: 18, total_tokens: 73 }],
-    }) as any;
-
-    conversationHistory.push(
-      new HumanMessage('Now compute the square root of that result.')
-    );
-    await run2.processStream(
-      { messages: conversationHistory },
-      streamConfig as any
-    );
-
-    const run2Messages = run2.getRunMessages();
-    expect(run2Messages).toBeDefined();
-    expect(run2Messages!.length).toBeGreaterThan(0);
-  });
-
-  // =========================================================================
-  // Test 9: Multi-turn with tool calls triggers summarization across runs
-  // =========================================================================
-  test('multi-turn with tool calls across runs triggers summarization correctly', async () => {
-    const spies = {
-      onSummarizeStartSpy: jest.fn(),
-      onSummarizeCompleteSpy: jest.fn(),
-    };
-    const conversationHistory: BaseMessage[] = [];
-
-    // Turn 1: tool call at generous budget
-    let run = await createRun({
-      maxTokens: 4000,
-      conversationHistory,
-      spies,
-      tools: [new Calculator()],
-    });
-    run.Graph?.overrideTestModel(
-      [
-        'Let me compute 100 * 200 for you using the calculator tool.',
-        'The result of 100 multiplied by 200 is 20,000. That is a basic multiplication.',
-      ],
-      1,
-      [
-        {
-          name: 'calculator',
-          args: { input: '100 * 200' },
-          id: 'tc_multi_1',
-          type: 'tool_call',
-        },
-      ]
-    );
-    await runTurn(
-      { run, conversationHistory },
-      'Calculate 100 * 200 with the calculator tool and explain the result.'
-    );
-
-    // Turn 2: another tool call to accumulate more tokens
-    run = await createRun({
-      maxTokens: 4000,
-      conversationHistory,
-      spies,
-      tools: [new Calculator()],
-    });
-    run.Graph?.overrideTestModel(
-      [
-        'Now computing 300 * 400.',
-        'The result of 300 multiplied by 400 is 120,000. Another straightforward calculation.',
-      ],
-      1,
-      [
-        {
-          name: 'calculator',
-          args: { input: '300 * 400' },
-          id: 'tc_multi_2',
-          type: 'tool_call',
-        },
-      ]
-    );
-    await runTurn(
-      { run, conversationHistory },
-      'Now compute 300 * 400 with the calculator and explain.'
-    );
-
-    // Conversation should have human, AI+toolcall, ToolMsg, AI × 2 turns
-    expect(conversationHistory.length).toBeGreaterThanOrEqual(8);
-
-    // Turn 3: tight budget to force summarization
-    run = await createRun({
-      maxTokens: 50,
-      conversationHistory,
-      spies,
-    });
-    run.Graph?.overrideTestModel(['Understood.'], 1);
-
-    try {
-      await runTurn({ run, conversationHistory }, 'What were all the results?');
-    } catch {
-      conversationHistory.pop();
-    }
-
-    // Summarization should fire — tool messages are part of the history being summarized
-    expect(spies.onSummarizeStartSpy).toHaveBeenCalled();
-    expect(spies.onSummarizeCompleteSpy).toHaveBeenCalled();
-
-    const completePayload = spies.onSummarizeCompleteSpy.mock
-      .calls[0][0] as t.SummarizeCompleteEvent;
-    expect(completePayload.summary).toBeDefined();
-    expect(completePayload.summary!.tokenCount).toBeGreaterThan(0);
-
-    // messagesToRefineCount should include the tool messages
-    const startPayload = spies.onSummarizeStartSpy.mock
-      .calls[0][0] as t.SummarizeStartEvent;
-    expect(startPayload.messagesToRefineCount).toBeGreaterThan(0);
-  });
-
-  // =========================================================================
-  // Test 10: No summarization when everything fits
-  // =========================================================================
-  test('no summarization fires when messages fit comfortably within budget', async () => {
-    const spies = {
-      onSummarizeStartSpy: jest.fn(),
-      onSummarizeCompleteSpy: jest.fn(),
-    };
-    const conversationHistory: BaseMessage[] = [];
-
-    const run = await createRun({
-      maxTokens: 4000,
-      conversationHistory,
-      spies,
-      tools: [new Calculator()],
-    });
-
-    const toolCalls: ToolCall[] = [
-      {
-        name: 'calculator',
-        args: { input: '2 + 2' },
-        id: 'tc_easy',
-        type: 'tool_call',
-      },
-    ];
-    run.Graph?.overrideTestModel(
-      ['Let me calculate.', 'The answer is 4.'],
-      1,
-      toolCalls
-    );
-
-    conversationHistory.push(new HumanMessage('What is 2+2?'));
-    await run.processStream(
-      { messages: conversationHistory },
-      streamConfig as any
-    );
-
-    // With 4000 token budget for a tiny conversation, no summarization should fire
-    expect(spies.onSummarizeStartSpy).not.toHaveBeenCalled();
-    expect(spies.onSummarizeCompleteSpy).not.toHaveBeenCalled();
-
-    // But the tool call should have worked
-    const runMessages = run.getRunMessages();
-    expect(runMessages).toBeDefined();
-    expect(runMessages!.length).toBeGreaterThanOrEqual(3);
-    const toolMsgs = runMessages!.filter((m) => m._getType() === 'tool');
-    expect(toolMsgs.length).toBe(1);
-    expect(toolMsgs[0].content as string).toContain('4');
-  });
-});