@leeovery/claude-technical-workflows 2.0.18 → 2.0.19

This diff represents the content of publicly available package versions that have been released to one of the supported registries. The information contained in this diff is provided for informational purposes only and reflects changes between package versions as they appear in their respective public registries.
package/package.json CHANGED
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
1
1
  {
2
2
  "name": "@leeovery/claude-technical-workflows",
3
- "version": "2.0.18",
3
+ "version": "2.0.19",
4
4
  "description": "Technical workflow skills & commands for Claude Code",
5
5
  "license": "MIT",
6
6
  "author": "Lee Overy <me@leeovery.com>",
@@ -37,15 +37,17 @@ Either way: Transform unvalidated reference material into a specification that's
37
37
 
38
38
  ## What You Do
39
39
 
40
- 1. **Filter**: Reference material may contain hallucinations, inaccuracies, or outdated concepts. Validate before including.
40
+ 1. **Extract exhaustively**: For each topic, re-scan ALL source material. Search for keywords and related terms. Information is often scattered - collect it all before synthesizing. Include only what we're building (not discarded alternatives).
41
41
 
42
- 2. **Enrich**: Reference material may have gaps. Fill them through discussion.
42
+ 2. **Filter**: Reference material may contain hallucinations, inaccuracies, or outdated concepts. Validate before including.
43
43
 
44
- 3. **Present**: Synthesize and present content to the user in the format it would appear in the specification.
44
+ 3. **Enrich**: Reference material may have gaps. Fill them through discussion.
45
45
 
46
- 4. **Log**: Only when approved, write content verbatim to the specification.
46
+ 4. **Present**: Synthesize and present content to the user in the format it would appear in the specification.
47
47
 
48
- The specification must be **standalone** - it contains everything formal planning needs. No references back to discussions or other source material.
48
+ 5. **Log**: Only when approved, write content verbatim to the specification.
49
+
50
+ The specification is the **golden document** - planning uses only this. If information doesn't make it into the specification, it won't be built. No references back to discussions or other source material.
49
51
 
50
52
  ## Critical Rules
51
53
 
@@ -33,8 +33,31 @@ Before starting any topic, identify ALL available reference material:
33
33
 
34
34
  Work through the specification **topic by topic**:
35
35
 
36
- ### 1. Review
37
- Read all reference material for the current topic. Understand what exists.
36
+ ### 1. Review (Exhaustive Extraction)
37
+
38
+ **This step is critical. The specification is the golden document - if information doesn't make it here, it won't be built.**
39
+
40
+ For each topic or subtopic, perform exhaustive extraction:
41
+
42
+ 1. **Re-scan ALL source material** - Don't rely on memory. Go back to the source material and systematically review it for the current topic.
43
+
44
+ 2. **Search for keywords** - Topics are rarely contained in one section. Search for:
45
+ - The topic name and synonyms
46
+ - Related concepts and terms
47
+ - Names of systems, fields, or behaviors mentioned in context
48
+
49
+ 3. **Collect scattered information** - Source material (research, discussions, requirements) is often non-linear. Information about a single topic may be scattered across:
50
+ - Multiple sections of the same document
51
+ - Different documents entirely
52
+ - Tangential discussions that revealed important details
53
+
54
+ 4. **Filter for what we're building** - Include only validated decisions:
55
+ - Exclude discarded alternatives
56
+ - Exclude ideas that were explored but rejected
57
+ - Exclude "maybes" that weren't confirmed
58
+ - Include only what the user has decided to build
59
+
60
+ **Why this matters:** The specification is the single source of truth for planning. Planning will not reference discussions or research - only this document. Missing a detail here means that detail doesn't get implemented.
38
61
 
39
62
  ### 2. Synthesize and Present
40
63
  Present your understanding to the user **in the format it would appear in the specification**:
@@ -98,6 +121,8 @@ Suggested skeleton:
98
121
 
99
122
  ## Critical Rules
100
123
 
124
+ **Exhaustive extraction is non-negotiable**: Before presenting any topic, re-scan source material. Search for keywords. Collect scattered information. The specification is the golden document - planning uses only this. If you miss something, it doesn't get built.
125
+
101
126
  **Present before logging**: Never write content to the specification until the user has seen and approved it.
102
127
 
103
128
  **Log verbatim**: When approved, write exactly what was presented - no silent modifications.