@leeovery/claude-technical-workflows 2.0.15 → 2.0.17
This diff represents the content of publicly available package versions that have been released to one of the supported registries. The information contained in this diff is provided for informational purposes only and reflects changes between package versions as they appear in their respective public registries.
- package/README.md +41 -24
- package/commands/link-dependencies.md +170 -0
- package/commands/start-discussion.md +6 -313
- package/commands/start-feature.md +80 -0
- package/commands/start-implementation.md +7 -101
- package/commands/start-planning.md +7 -86
- package/commands/start-research.md +7 -13
- package/commands/start-specification.md +7 -81
- package/commands/workflow:start-discussion.md +339 -0
- package/commands/workflow:start-implementation.md +187 -0
- package/commands/workflow:start-planning.md +111 -0
- package/commands/workflow:start-research.md +38 -0
- package/commands/workflow:start-review.md +112 -0
- package/commands/workflow:start-specification.md +106 -0
- package/package.json +1 -1
- package/skills/technical-discussion/SKILL.md +13 -8
- package/skills/technical-implementation/SKILL.md +23 -11
- package/skills/technical-planning/SKILL.md +14 -12
- package/skills/technical-planning/references/dependencies.md +69 -0
- package/skills/technical-planning/references/formal-planning.md +25 -0
- package/skills/technical-planning/references/output-backlog-md.md +75 -4
- package/skills/technical-planning/references/output-beads.md +95 -5
- package/skills/technical-planning/references/output-linear.md +57 -4
- package/skills/technical-planning/references/output-local-markdown.md +71 -3
- package/skills/technical-research/SKILL.md +13 -9
- package/skills/technical-review/SKILL.md +26 -9
- package/skills/technical-review/references/review-checklist.md +4 -2
- package/skills/technical-specification/SKILL.md +16 -9
- package/skills/technical-specification/references/specification-guide.md +8 -9
|
@@ -9,16 +9,23 @@ Act as **expert technical architect** and **specification builder**. Collaborate
|
|
|
9
9
|
|
|
10
10
|
Your role is to synthesize reference material, present it for validation, and build a specification that formal planning can execute against.
|
|
11
11
|
|
|
12
|
-
##
|
|
12
|
+
## Purpose in the Workflow
|
|
13
13
|
|
|
14
|
-
|
|
15
|
-
|
|
16
|
-
|
|
17
|
-
4. **Planning** (next): HOW - phases, tasks, acceptance criteria
|
|
18
|
-
5. **Implementation** (after): DOING - tests first, then code
|
|
19
|
-
6. **Review** (final): VALIDATING - check work against artifacts
|
|
14
|
+
This skill can be used:
|
|
15
|
+
- **Sequentially** (Phase 3): After discussion documents exist
|
|
16
|
+
- **Standalone** (Contract entry): With reference material from any source (research docs, conversation transcripts, design documents, inline feature description)
|
|
20
17
|
|
|
21
|
-
|
|
18
|
+
Either way: Transform unvalidated reference material into a specification that's **standalone and approved**.
|
|
19
|
+
|
|
20
|
+
### What This Skill Needs
|
|
21
|
+
|
|
22
|
+
- **Source material** (required) - The content to synthesize into a specification. Can be:
|
|
23
|
+
- Discussion document content (from sequential workflow)
|
|
24
|
+
- Inline feature description (from `/start-feature`)
|
|
25
|
+
- Any other reference material (requirements docs, transcripts, etc.)
|
|
26
|
+
- **Topic name** (required) - Used for the output filename
|
|
27
|
+
|
|
28
|
+
**If missing:** Will ask user to provide context or point to source files.
|
|
22
29
|
|
|
23
30
|
## The Process
|
|
24
31
|
|
|
@@ -26,7 +33,7 @@ You're at step 3. Build the specification. Don't jump to phases, tasks, or code.
|
|
|
26
33
|
|
|
27
34
|
**Output**: `docs/workflow/specification/{topic}.md`
|
|
28
35
|
|
|
29
|
-
**When complete**: User signs off
|
|
36
|
+
**When complete**: User signs off on the specification.
|
|
30
37
|
|
|
31
38
|
## What You Do
|
|
32
39
|
|
|
@@ -20,13 +20,14 @@ The specification is the **bridge document** - a workspace for collecting valida
|
|
|
20
20
|
|
|
21
21
|
## Source Materials
|
|
22
22
|
|
|
23
|
-
Before starting any topic,
|
|
24
|
-
- Discussion documents (
|
|
25
|
-
-
|
|
26
|
-
-
|
|
27
|
-
-
|
|
23
|
+
Before starting any topic, identify ALL available reference material:
|
|
24
|
+
- Discussion documents (if they exist)
|
|
25
|
+
- Existing partial plans or specifications
|
|
26
|
+
- Requirements, design docs, related documentation
|
|
27
|
+
- User-provided context or transcripts
|
|
28
|
+
- Inline feature descriptions
|
|
28
29
|
|
|
29
|
-
**Treat all source material as untrusted input
|
|
30
|
+
**Treat all source material as untrusted input**, whether it came from the discussion phase or elsewhere. Your job is to synthesize and present - the user validates.
|
|
30
31
|
|
|
31
32
|
## The Workflow
|
|
32
33
|
|
|
@@ -160,11 +161,9 @@ This section feeds into the planning phase, where dependencies become blocking r
|
|
|
160
161
|
|
|
161
162
|
Analyze the specification in isolation - identify what it references that must exist, not what you know exists elsewhere in the project.
|
|
162
163
|
|
|
163
|
-
##
|
|
164
|
+
## Completion
|
|
164
165
|
|
|
165
166
|
Specification is complete when:
|
|
166
167
|
- All topics/phases have validated content
|
|
167
168
|
- User confirms the specification is complete
|
|
168
169
|
- No blocking gaps remain
|
|
169
|
-
|
|
170
|
-
Then proceed to formal planning with the **technical-planning** skill.
|