@learning-commons/evaluators 0.2.0 → 0.4.0

This diff represents the content of publicly available package versions that have been released to one of the supported registries. The information contained in this diff is provided for informational purposes only and reflects changes between package versions as they appear in their respective public registries.
package/dist/index.js CHANGED
@@ -484,7 +484,7 @@ var BaseEvaluator = class {
484
484
  const validList = Array.from(validGrades).sort((a, b) => {
485
485
  if (a === "K") return -1;
486
486
  if (b === "K") return 1;
487
- return parseInt(a) - parseInt(b);
487
+ return parseInt(a, 10) - parseInt(b, 10);
488
488
  }).join(", ");
489
489
  throw new ValidationError(
490
490
  `Invalid grade "${grade}". Supported grades for this evaluator: ${validList}`
@@ -1999,11 +1999,222 @@ async function evaluateSmk(text, grade, config) {
1999
1999
  const evaluator = new SmkEvaluator(config);
2000
2000
  return evaluator.evaluate(text, grade);
2001
2001
  }
2002
+ var ConventionalityOutputSchema = z.object({
2003
+ conventionality_features: z.array(z.string()).describe("The specific language features driving the complexity (e.g., literal narrative, concrete actions, sustained irony, abstract qualities) with direct quotes from the text."),
2004
+ grade_context: z.string().describe("How the conventionality demands compare to general expectations for the provided target grade."),
2005
+ instructional_insights: z.string().describe("Actionable pedagogical suggestions for scaffolding the conventionality features in the classroom."),
2006
+ complexity_score: TextComplexityLevel.describe("The conventionality complexity level of the text"),
2007
+ reasoning: z.string().describe("A detailed explanation of the rating, citing specific features in the text and referencing the expert guardrails.")
2008
+ });
2009
+
2010
+ // ../../evals/prompts/conventionality/system.txt
2011
+ var system_default3 = `Role
2012
+ You are an expert reading teacher and text complexity evaluator. Your task is to evaluate the "Conventionality" of a text and assign it a complexity level based on a 4-point scale, carefully factoring in the target grade level.
2013
+
2014
+ Objective
2015
+ Measure how explicit, literal, and straightforward the text's meaning is, versus how abstract, ironic, figurative, or archaic it is. Focus on the hiddenness of the meaning, the use of conceptual framing, the reliance on abstract reasoning, and the familiarity of the expression for the target grade.
2016
+
2017
+ Complexity Levels
2018
+ - Slightly Complex: Explicit, literal, straightforward, easy to understand. Meaning is entirely on the surface. The language is concrete, and the meaning is clear and procedural, mostly referring to observable materials and actions. Contains no symbolic or ironic language, and conceptual interpretation is not required. Contains limited figurative language that is common and easy to comprehend at the target grade level.
2019
+ - Moderately Complex: Largely explicit and easy to understand with some occasions for more complex meaning. May contain a noticeable amount of archaic/dated phrasing, formal historical prose, vocabulary demands, background knowledge requirements, or expressions that are less familiar to the target grade level, which might make the text feel vague or slightly challenging.
2020
+ - Very Complex: Fairly complex; contains sustained abstract language, conceptual framing, rhetorical idealization, ironic comparisons, or central metaphors that drive the meaning of the text. Addresses concepts, beliefs, and abstract qualities rather than just concrete objects. The tone or underlying message requires interpretation, even if the surface message is clear.
2021
+ - Exceedingly Complex: Dense and complex; contains considerable abstract, ironic, and/or figurative language. Meaning is heavily hidden, deeply conceptual, or relies heavily on complex rhetorical devices.
2022
+
2023
+ Essential Evaluation Rules
2024
+ 1. Concrete & Procedural Texts: Texts that are highly concrete, clear, and procedural (e.g., describing observable materials, mechanical processes, or physical actions) should typically be rated "Slightly Complex."
2025
+
2026
+ 2. Grade-Level Anchoring and Vague Narratives: Always consider the target grade. A literal historical narrative that might be straightforward for older students can be "Moderately Complex" for younger students (e.g., 4th graders) if it involves less familiar expressions, older contexts (e.g., wagon loads, traveling by horseback), vocabulary demands, and background knowledge requirements that make the text feel vague or slightly demanding for that age group.
2027
+
2028
+ 3. Rhetorical Idealization and Abstract Qualities: If an entire argument or narrative is built around abstract qualities (e.g., national character, bravery, liberty) and uses repeated figurative language or personification to portray a subject in a certain idealized way, rate the text as "Very Complex." Even if the figurative language is easy to interpret, the need to interpret the rhetorical tone and sustained abstract focus elevates the complexity beyond level two.
2029
+
2030
+ 4. Common Idioms and Grade-Level Appropriateness: Do NOT elevate a text to "Moderately Complex" simply because it contains a few common idiomatic expressions. If these expressions are widely known and easy for the target grade to understand without making the text feel vague, the text remains "Slightly Complex."
2031
+
2032
+ 5. Conversational and Hypothetical Framing: Using a second-person conversational hook (e.g., "Imagine you are...") to explain a concept is a standard, literal device for engaging readers. It does not constitute complex conceptual framing.
2033
+
2034
+ 6. Sustained vs. Occasional Impact: If abstract language, figurative phrasing, irony, or conceptual framing is sustained throughout the text and central to the argument/meaning, the text is Very Complex. Reserve Moderately Complex for texts where the explicit meaning dominates but the expression, vocabulary, or archaic language provides a moderate conventionality challenge.
2035
+
2036
+ 7. Central Metaphors and Conceptual Framing: When an author uses a central metaphor to explain a concept or uses figurative phrasing to explain how things "work," this abstract reasoning drives the meaning, elevating the text to Very Complex.
2037
+
2038
+ 8. Irony and Abstract Comparisons: Texts that rely on sustained irony, especially through comparative arguments, are inherently Very Complex for younger students.
2039
+
2040
+ 9. Isolate Conventionality from Vocabulary: Do not inflate the Conventionality score just because the text uses archaic, dated, or highly academic vocabulary.
2041
+
2042
+ Input Format
2043
+ You will receive:
2044
+ - text: The passage to evaluate.
2045
+ - grade_level: The target student grade level.
2046
+ - fk_score: The Flesch-Kincaid readability score.
2047
+
2048
+ Output Format
2049
+ Provide a JSON object containing ONLY the following keys:
2050
+ - complexity_score: (String) One of the 4 scale levels exactly as formatted: 'slightly_complex', 'moderately_complex', 'very_complex', or 'exceedingly_complex'.
2051
+ - reasoning: (String) A detailed explanation of the rating, citing specific features in the text and referencing the expert guardrails (e.g., noting if the text relies on abstract qualities/rhetorical idealization, if vocabulary/background knowledge demands make a literal text vague for the grade level, or if it is strictly concrete/procedural).
2052
+ - conventionality_features: (List of Strings) The specific language features driving the complexity (e.g., literal narrative, concrete actions, less familiar expressions, sustained irony, abstract qualities, rhetorical idealization, archaic phrasing) with direct quotes from the text.
2053
+ - grade_context: (String) How the conventionality demands compare to general expectations for the provided target grade.
2054
+ - instructional_insights: (String) Actionable pedagogical suggestions for scaffolding the conventionality features in the classroom.`;
2055
+
2056
+ // ../../evals/prompts/conventionality/user.txt
2057
+ var user_default3 = "Analyze:\nText: {text}\nGrade: {grade}\nFK Score: {fk_score}";
2058
+
2059
+ // src/prompts/conventionality/index.ts
2060
+ function getSystemPrompt4() {
2061
+ return system_default3;
2062
+ }
2063
+ function getUserPrompt4(text, grade, fkScore) {
2064
+ return user_default3.replaceAll("{text}", text).replaceAll("{grade}", grade).replaceAll("{fk_score}", fkScore.toString());
2065
+ }
2066
+
2067
+ // src/evaluators/conventionality.ts
2068
+ var ConventionalityEvaluator = class _ConventionalityEvaluator extends BaseEvaluator {
2069
+ static metadata = {
2070
+ id: "conventionality",
2071
+ name: "Conventionality",
2072
+ description: "Evaluates how explicit, literal, and straightforward a text's meaning is relative to grade level",
2073
+ supportedGrades: ["3", "4", "5", "6", "7", "8", "9", "10", "11", "12"],
2074
+ requiresGoogleKey: true,
2075
+ requiresOpenAIKey: false
2076
+ };
2077
+ provider;
2078
+ constructor(config) {
2079
+ super(config);
2080
+ this.provider = createProvider({
2081
+ type: "google",
2082
+ model: "gemini-3-flash-preview",
2083
+ apiKey: config.googleApiKey,
2084
+ maxRetries: this.config.maxRetries
2085
+ });
2086
+ }
2087
+ /**
2088
+ * Evaluate conventionality complexity for a given text and grade level
2089
+ *
2090
+ * @param text - The text to evaluate
2091
+ * @param grade - The target grade level (3-12)
2092
+ * @returns Evaluation result with complexity score and detailed analysis
2093
+ * @throws {ValidationError} If text is empty, too short/long, or grade is invalid
2094
+ * @throws {APIError} If LLM API calls fail (includes AuthenticationError, RateLimitError, NetworkError, TimeoutError)
2095
+ */
2096
+ async evaluate(text, grade) {
2097
+ this.logger.info("Starting Conventionality evaluation", {
2098
+ evaluator: "conventionality",
2099
+ operation: "evaluate",
2100
+ grade,
2101
+ textLength: text.length
2102
+ });
2103
+ const startTime = Date.now();
2104
+ const stageDetails = [];
2105
+ try {
2106
+ this.validateText(text);
2107
+ this.validateGrade(grade, new Set(_ConventionalityEvaluator.metadata.supportedGrades));
2108
+ this.logger.debug("Evaluating conventionality complexity", {
2109
+ evaluator: "conventionality",
2110
+ operation: "conventionality_evaluation"
2111
+ });
2112
+ const fkScore = calculateFleschKincaidGrade(text);
2113
+ const response = await this.evaluateConventionality(text, grade, fkScore);
2114
+ stageDetails.push({
2115
+ stage: "conventionality_evaluation",
2116
+ provider: "google:gemini-3-flash-preview",
2117
+ latency_ms: response.latencyMs,
2118
+ token_usage: {
2119
+ input_tokens: response.usage.inputTokens,
2120
+ output_tokens: response.usage.outputTokens
2121
+ }
2122
+ });
2123
+ const latencyMs = Date.now() - startTime;
2124
+ const totalTokenUsage = {
2125
+ input_tokens: stageDetails.reduce((sum, s) => sum + (s.token_usage?.input_tokens || 0), 0),
2126
+ output_tokens: stageDetails.reduce((sum, s) => sum + (s.token_usage?.output_tokens || 0), 0)
2127
+ };
2128
+ const result = {
2129
+ score: response.data.complexity_score,
2130
+ reasoning: response.data.reasoning,
2131
+ metadata: {
2132
+ model: "google:gemini-3-flash-preview",
2133
+ processingTimeMs: latencyMs
2134
+ },
2135
+ _internal: response.data
2136
+ };
2137
+ this.sendTelemetry({
2138
+ status: "success",
2139
+ latencyMs,
2140
+ textLength: text.length,
2141
+ grade,
2142
+ provider: "google:gemini-3-flash-preview",
2143
+ tokenUsage: totalTokenUsage,
2144
+ metadata: {
2145
+ stage_details: stageDetails
2146
+ },
2147
+ inputText: text
2148
+ }).catch(() => {
2149
+ });
2150
+ this.logger.info("Conventionality evaluation completed successfully", {
2151
+ evaluator: "conventionality",
2152
+ operation: "evaluate",
2153
+ grade,
2154
+ score: result.score,
2155
+ processingTimeMs: latencyMs
2156
+ });
2157
+ return result;
2158
+ } catch (error) {
2159
+ const latencyMs = Date.now() - startTime;
2160
+ this.logger.error("Conventionality evaluation failed", {
2161
+ evaluator: "conventionality",
2162
+ operation: "evaluate",
2163
+ grade,
2164
+ error: error instanceof Error ? error : void 0,
2165
+ processingTimeMs: latencyMs,
2166
+ completedStages: stageDetails.length
2167
+ });
2168
+ const totalTokenUsage = stageDetails.length > 0 ? {
2169
+ input_tokens: stageDetails.reduce((sum, s) => sum + (s.token_usage?.input_tokens || 0), 0),
2170
+ output_tokens: stageDetails.reduce((sum, s) => sum + (s.token_usage?.output_tokens || 0), 0)
2171
+ } : void 0;
2172
+ this.sendTelemetry({
2173
+ status: "error",
2174
+ latencyMs,
2175
+ textLength: text.length,
2176
+ grade,
2177
+ provider: "google:gemini-3-flash-preview",
2178
+ tokenUsage: totalTokenUsage,
2179
+ errorCode: error instanceof Error ? error.name : "UnknownError",
2180
+ metadata: stageDetails.length > 0 ? { stage_details: stageDetails } : void 0,
2181
+ inputText: text
2182
+ }).catch(() => {
2183
+ });
2184
+ if (error instanceof ValidationError) {
2185
+ throw error;
2186
+ }
2187
+ throw wrapProviderError(error, "Conventionality evaluation failed");
2188
+ }
2189
+ }
2190
+ /**
2191
+ * Run the Conventionality evaluation LLM call
2192
+ */
2193
+ async evaluateConventionality(text, grade, fkScore) {
2194
+ const response = await this.provider.generateStructured({
2195
+ messages: [
2196
+ { role: "system", content: getSystemPrompt4() },
2197
+ { role: "user", content: getUserPrompt4(text, grade, fkScore) }
2198
+ ],
2199
+ schema: ConventionalityOutputSchema,
2200
+ temperature: 0
2201
+ });
2202
+ return {
2203
+ data: response.data,
2204
+ usage: response.usage,
2205
+ latencyMs: response.latencyMs
2206
+ };
2207
+ }
2208
+ };
2209
+ async function evaluateConventionality(text, grade, config) {
2210
+ const evaluator = new ConventionalityEvaluator(config);
2211
+ return evaluator.evaluate(text, grade);
2212
+ }
2002
2213
  var TextComplexityEvaluator = class _TextComplexityEvaluator extends BaseEvaluator {
2003
2214
  static metadata = {
2004
2215
  id: "text-complexity",
2005
2216
  name: "Text Complexity",
2006
- description: "Composite evaluator analyzing vocabulary, sentence structure, and subject matter knowledge complexity",
2217
+ description: "Composite evaluator analyzing vocabulary, sentence structure, subject matter knowledge, and conventionality complexity",
2007
2218
  supportedGrades: ["3", "4", "5", "6", "7", "8", "9", "10", "11", "12"],
2008
2219
  requiresGoogleKey: true,
2009
2220
  requiresOpenAIKey: true
@@ -2011,12 +2222,14 @@ var TextComplexityEvaluator = class _TextComplexityEvaluator extends BaseEvaluat
2011
2222
  vocabularyEvaluator;
2012
2223
  sentenceStructureEvaluator;
2013
2224
  smkEvaluator;
2225
+ conventionalityEvaluator;
2014
2226
  limit;
2015
2227
  constructor(config) {
2016
2228
  super(config);
2017
2229
  this.vocabularyEvaluator = new VocabularyEvaluator(config);
2018
2230
  this.sentenceStructureEvaluator = new SentenceStructureEvaluator(config);
2019
2231
  this.smkEvaluator = new SmkEvaluator(config);
2232
+ this.conventionalityEvaluator = new ConventionalityEvaluator(config);
2020
2233
  this.limit = pLimit(3);
2021
2234
  }
2022
2235
  /**
@@ -2042,21 +2255,24 @@ var TextComplexityEvaluator = class _TextComplexityEvaluator extends BaseEvaluat
2042
2255
  this.validateText(text);
2043
2256
  this.validateGrade(grade, new Set(_TextComplexityEvaluator.metadata.supportedGrades));
2044
2257
  const startTime = Date.now();
2045
- const [vocabResult, sentenceResult, smkResult] = await Promise.all([
2258
+ const [vocabResult, sentenceResult, smkResult, conventionalityResult] = await Promise.all([
2046
2259
  this.limit(() => this.runSubEvaluator(this.vocabularyEvaluator, text, grade)),
2047
2260
  this.limit(() => this.runSubEvaluator(this.sentenceStructureEvaluator, text, grade)),
2048
- this.limit(() => this.runSubEvaluator(this.smkEvaluator, text, grade))
2261
+ this.limit(() => this.runSubEvaluator(this.smkEvaluator, text, grade)),
2262
+ this.limit(() => this.runSubEvaluator(this.conventionalityEvaluator, text, grade))
2049
2263
  ]);
2050
2264
  const latencyMs = Date.now() - startTime;
2051
2265
  const vocabFailed = "error" in vocabResult;
2052
2266
  const sentenceFailed = "error" in sentenceResult;
2053
2267
  const smkFailed = "error" in smkResult;
2054
- const hasFailures = vocabFailed || sentenceFailed || smkFailed;
2268
+ const conventionalityFailed = "error" in conventionalityResult;
2269
+ const hasFailures = vocabFailed || sentenceFailed || smkFailed || conventionalityFailed;
2055
2270
  if (hasFailures) {
2056
2271
  const errors = [];
2057
2272
  if (vocabFailed) errors.push(`Vocabulary: ${vocabResult.error.message}`);
2058
2273
  if (sentenceFailed) errors.push(`Sentence structure: ${sentenceResult.error.message}`);
2059
2274
  if (smkFailed) errors.push(`Subject matter knowledge: ${smkResult.error.message}`);
2275
+ if (conventionalityFailed) errors.push(`Conventionality: ${conventionalityResult.error.message}`);
2060
2276
  this.logger.error("Text complexity evaluation completed with errors", {
2061
2277
  evaluator: "text-complexity",
2062
2278
  operation: "evaluate",
@@ -2064,7 +2280,7 @@ var TextComplexityEvaluator = class _TextComplexityEvaluator extends BaseEvaluat
2064
2280
  errors,
2065
2281
  processingTimeMs: latencyMs
2066
2282
  });
2067
- if (vocabFailed && sentenceFailed && smkFailed) {
2283
+ if (vocabFailed && sentenceFailed && smkFailed && conventionalityFailed) {
2068
2284
  throw new Error(`Text complexity evaluation failed: ${errors.join("; ")}`);
2069
2285
  }
2070
2286
  }
@@ -2085,7 +2301,7 @@ var TextComplexityEvaluator = class _TextComplexityEvaluator extends BaseEvaluat
2085
2301
  processingTimeMs: latencyMs,
2086
2302
  hasFailures
2087
2303
  });
2088
- return { vocabulary: vocabResult, sentenceStructure: sentenceResult, subjectMatterKnowledge: smkResult };
2304
+ return { vocabulary: vocabResult, sentenceStructure: sentenceResult, subjectMatterKnowledge: smkResult, conventionality: conventionalityResult };
2089
2305
  }
2090
2306
  /**
2091
2307
  * Run a sub-evaluator with error handling.
@@ -2104,6 +2320,6 @@ async function evaluateTextComplexity(text, grade, config) {
2104
2320
  return evaluator.evaluate(text, grade);
2105
2321
  }
2106
2322
 
2107
- export { APIError, AuthenticationError, ComplexityClassificationSchema, ConfigurationError, EvaluatorError, GradeBand, GradeLevelAppropriatenessEvaluator, GradeLevelAppropriatenessSchema, LogLevel, NetworkError, RateLimitError, SentenceAnalysisSchema, SentenceStructureEvaluator, SmkEvaluator, TextComplexityEvaluator, TextComplexityLevel, TimeoutError, ValidationError, VocabularyEvaluator, addEngineeredFeatures, calculateFleschKincaidGrade, calculateReadabilityMetrics, evaluateGradeLevelAppropriateness, evaluateSentenceStructure, evaluateSmk, evaluateTextComplexity, evaluateVocabulary, featuresToJSON };
2323
+ export { APIError, AuthenticationError, ComplexityClassificationSchema, ConfigurationError, ConventionalityEvaluator, EvaluatorError, GradeBand, GradeLevelAppropriatenessEvaluator, GradeLevelAppropriatenessSchema, LogLevel, NetworkError, RateLimitError, SentenceAnalysisSchema, SentenceStructureEvaluator, SmkEvaluator, TextComplexityEvaluator, TextComplexityLevel, TimeoutError, ValidationError, VocabularyEvaluator, addEngineeredFeatures, calculateFleschKincaidGrade, calculateReadabilityMetrics, evaluateConventionality, evaluateGradeLevelAppropriateness, evaluateSentenceStructure, evaluateSmk, evaluateTextComplexity, evaluateVocabulary, featuresToJSON };
2108
2324
  //# sourceMappingURL=index.js.map
2109
2325
  //# sourceMappingURL=index.js.map