@leanspec/ui 0.2.8 → 0.2.9-dev.20251205030455

package/.next/standalone/packages/ui/dist/standalone/specs/043-official-launch-02/SESSION-2025-11-06.md

@@ -1,166 +0,0 @@
-# Session Summary: 2025-11-06
-
-## 🎯 Session Goals
-Review v0.2.0 launch progress and complete remaining high-priority specs.
-
-## ✅ Completed Tasks
-
-### 1. **Spec 052: Branding Assets** - COMPLETE
-- ✅ Launched parallel coding agent task
-- ✅ PNG exports, favicons, social media assets all generated
-- ✅ Docs site fully branded with dark mode support
-- ✅ GitHub social preview configured
-
-### 2. **Spec 044: Spec Relationships Clarity** - COMPLETE
-- ✅ Launched parallel coding agent task
-- ✅ `related` field now truly bidirectional in `lean-spec deps` output
-- ✅ Cleaner UX with single "Related Specs" section instead of "Related" + "Related By"
-- ✅ Matches user expectations (if A relates to B, B automatically shows relation to A)
-
-### 3. **Spec 018: Spec Validation** - COMPLETE
-- ✅ Marked as complete (phases 1-3.5 shipped, ready for v0.2.0)
-- ✅ Fixed phase status conflicts between README.md and IMPLEMENTATION.md
-- ✅ **Major UX improvement**: Sub-spec line count validation now shows inline with parent specs
-  - Before: Separate "Sub-Specs" section with duplicated info
-  - After: Line counts show directly under parent spec (much clearer!)
-- ✅ Sub-Specs section now only shows structural issues (orphaned files, naming conventions)
-
-### 4. **Documentation Quality**
-- ✅ Verified Docusaurus configured with `onBrokenLinks: 'throw'`
-- ✅ Build fails automatically on broken links (no manual checking needed)
-- ✅ Updated AGENTS.md and spec 043 to reflect this
-
-### 5. **Spec 043: Launch Status Updates**
-- ✅ Updated status summary to reflect Phase 2 completion
-- ✅ All critical path specs now marked complete
-- ✅ Phase 2: COMPLETE (was IN PROGRESS)
-- ✅ Phase 3: READY TO START (dogfooding checkpoint next)
-
-## 📊 Current Project Status
-
-### Stats Overview
-- **Total Specs**: 25 active (29 archived)
-- **Complete**: 14 (56%)
-- **In Progress**: 2
-- **Planned**: 9
-- **Test Pass Rate**: 261/261 (100%)
-
-### Critical Path Status
-All critical path specs COMPLETE ✅:
-- [x] Spec 018: Spec validation
-- [x] Spec 024: Pattern-aware list grouping
-- [x] Spec 026: Init pattern selection
-- [x] Spec 042: MCP error handling
-- [x] Spec 044: Spec relationships clarity
-- [x] Spec 045: Unified dashboard
-- [x] Spec 046: Stats dashboard refactor
-- [x] Spec 048: Complexity analysis
-- [x] Spec 051: Docs + AGENTS.md with first principles
-- [x] Spec 052: Branding assets
-
-### Launch Phases
-- **Phase 1: Foundation** - ✅ COMPLETE
-- **Phase 2: Operationalization** - ✅ COMPLETE
-- **Phase 3: Launch Prep** - 🟡 READY TO START
-
-## 🎯 Next Session Priorities
-
-### 1. **Dogfooding Checkpoint** (HIGH PRIORITY)
-Practice what we preach - fix Context Economy violations:
-
-**MUST SPLIT (>400 lines):**
-- ❗ Spec 045: Unified dashboard (1169 lines)
-- ❗ Spec 046: Stats dashboard refactor (685 lines)
-- ❗ Spec 048: Complexity analysis (601 lines)
-
-**Sub-spec files to split:**
-- ❗ Spec 049: ANALYSIS.md (428 lines), OPERATIONALIZATION.md (415 lines)
-- ❗ Spec 018: CONFIGURATION.md (443 lines)
-
-**Decision needed (300-400 lines):**
-- ⚠️ 7 specs in warning zone (simplify or accept?)
-
-### 2. **Beta Testing**
-- Test with 3-5 external users
-- Validate principle-based decision making with AI agents
-- Collect onboarding feedback
-
-### 3. **Launch Preparation**
-- Version bump and CHANGELOG
-- Marketing content finalization
-- Release engineering
-
-## 🔧 Technical Improvements
-
-### Validation Output UX Enhancement
-**Before:**
-```
-Line Count:
-  ⚠ 049-leanspec-first-principles (373 lines)
-
-Sub-Specs:
-  ✗ 2 spec(s) with errors:
-    - 049-leanspec-first-principles
-      • Sub-spec ANALYSIS.md exceeds 400 lines (428 lines)
-```
-
-**After:**
-```
-Line Count:
-  ⚠ 049-leanspec-first-principles (373 lines)
-     ✗ Sub-spec ANALYSIS.md exceeds 400 lines (428 lines)
-     ✗ Sub-spec OPERATIONALIZATION.md exceeds 400 lines (415 lines)
-     ⚠ Sub-spec FIRST-PRINCIPLES.md approaching limit (377/400)
-
-Sub-Specs:
-  ⚠ 1 spec(s) with warnings:
-    - 045-unified-dashboard
-      • Orphaned sub-spec: IMPLEMENTATION.md (not linked)
-```
-
-**Benefits:**
-- All line count info grouped together
-- Easier to see parent-child hierarchy
-- Sub-Specs section only shows structural issues
-- Much more actionable output
-
-## 📝 Key Learnings
-
-1. **Parallel coding agents work great** for independent, well-defined tasks
-2. **Validation UX matters** - inline display much clearer than separate sections
-3. **Docusaurus handles broken links automatically** - no need for manual checks
-4. **We're not dogfooding our own principles yet** - 3 specs violate Context Economy (>400 lines)
-
-## 🚦 Launch Readiness Assessment
-
-**Status: 🟡 ON TRACK**
-
-**Ready:**
-- ✅ All critical path features complete
-- ✅ Test coverage excellent (100% pass rate)
-- ✅ Validation tooling operational
-- ✅ Branding and marketing assets ready
-- ✅ Documentation accurate and clear
-
-**Blocker:**
-- ❗ **Dogfooding gap** - Must split large specs before launch
-  - Would be hypocritical to launch with specs violating our own principles
-  - Estimated: 1-2 days to split 3 specs + sub-specs
-
-**Timeline:**
-- **This week**: Dogfooding checkpoint (split large specs)
-- **Next week**: Beta testing and final polish
-- **Week after**: Launch prep and execution
-- **Target**: Mid-December 2025 (on track!)
-
-## 🎉 Wins
-
-1. **Phase 2 complete ahead of schedule** - all validation, UX, and branding done
-2. **Validation output is now excellent** - users can easily spot issues
-3. **Parallel execution worked perfectly** - specs 044 and 052 done simultaneously
-4. **Zero test failures** - stability is rock solid
-5. **Clear path forward** - just need to practice what we preach (split large specs)
-
----
-
-**Next session**: Focus on dogfooding - split specs 045, 046, 048 to demonstrate Context Economy in practice. 🎯

package/.next/standalone/packages/ui/dist/standalone/specs/043-official-launch-02/TESTING.md

@@ -1,126 +0,0 @@
-# Testing & Quality Assurance
-
-Quality gates, testing strategy, and success metrics for v0.2.0 launch.
-
-## Pre-Launch Quality Gates
-
-### Automated Testing
-- [x] All 261 tests passing (100%) - ✅ COMPLETE
-- [ ] Coverage remains >80% (verify with `pnpm test:coverage`)
-- [ ] CI/CD pipeline green
-- [ ] No TypeScript errors
-- [ ] Lint passes
-- [ ] Build succeeds without warnings
-
-### Manual Testing
-- [ ] Install via `npm install -g lean-spec` works
-- [ ] `lean-spec init` completes successfully
-- [ ] `lean-spec create` generates valid specs
-- [ ] `lean-spec list` displays correctly
-- [ ] `lean-spec search` returns relevant results
-- [ ] `lean-spec update` modifies specs correctly
-- [ ] `lean-spec board` renders properly
-- [ ] `lean-spec stats` shows accurate data
-- [ ] MCP server connects and responds without crashes
-
-### Integration Testing
-- [ ] MCP integration with Claude Desktop works
-- [ ] MCP integration with VS Code Copilot works
-- [ ] Works on macOS, Linux, Windows
-- [ ] Works with different terminal emulators
-- [ ] Works in monorepo and single-repo setups
-
-### Documentation Testing
-- [ ] New user follows README → creates first spec in <5 min
-- [ ] All code examples in docs execute correctly
-- [ ] Links in documentation are not broken
-- [ ] API reference matches actual CLI behavior
-- [ ] AGENTS.md instructions work for AI agents
-
-### Beta User Testing
-- [ ] 3-5 external beta testers try installation
-- [ ] Beta testers complete onboarding successfully
-- [ ] Collect qualitative feedback
-- [ ] No critical issues reported
-- [ ] >80% satisfaction rating
-
----
-
-## Launch Day Verification
-
-- [ ] npm package published successfully
-- [ ] GitHub release created with assets
-- [ ] Documentation website reflects v0.2.0
-- [ ] All marketing links work
-- [ ] Analytics tracking active
-- [ ] Community channels live
-
----
-
-## Success Metrics (30 Days Post-Launch)
-
-### Adoption
-- [ ] 1,000+ npm downloads
-- [ ] 100+ GitHub stars
-- [ ] 50+ unique users/organizations
-- [ ] 10+ community contributions (issues, PRs, discussions)
-
-### Quality
-- [ ] No critical bugs reported
-- [ ] <5 high-priority bugs
-- [ ] 90%+ user satisfaction (surveys)
-- [ ] <1% crash rate
-
-### Community
-- [ ] 5+ blog posts or mentions from users
-- [ ] Active discussions in GitHub Discussions
-- [ ] Positive sentiment on social media
-- [ ] Featured on at least 1 newsletter/podcast
-
----
-
-## First Principles Validation Checklist
-
-Before v0.2.0 launch, verify all specs follow first principles:
-
-### Context Economy (< 400 lines)
-- [ ] All specs under 400 lines OR split into sub-specs
-- [ ] No warnings from `lean-spec complexity` (when implemented)
-- [ ] Each spec readable in <10 minutes
-
-### Signal-to-Noise (Every word informs decisions)
-- [ ] No "maybe future" content in specs
-- [ ] Every section answers: "What decision does this inform?"
-- [ ] Cut obvious or inferable content
-
-### Intent Over Implementation (Capture why)
-- [ ] All specs explain rationale for decisions
-- [ ] Trade-offs documented
-- [ ] Success criteria clear
-
-### Bridge the Gap (Both human and AI understand)
-- [ ] Clear structure + natural language
-- [ ] AI agents can parse and reason about specs
-- [ ] Humans understand overview quickly
-
-### Progressive Disclosure (Add complexity when needed)
-- [ ] Start simple, add structure when pain felt
-- [ ] No "just in case" features
-- [ ] Sub-specs used appropriately
-
----
-
-## Performance Benchmarks
-
-Target performance for common operations:
-
-- [ ] `lean-spec list` < 100ms (for repos with <100 specs)
-- [ ] `lean-spec search` < 500ms (full-text search)
-- [ ] `lean-spec view` < 50ms (single spec)
-- [ ] `lean-spec board` < 200ms (with stats)
-- [ ] `lean-spec stats` < 300ms (full analytics)
-
-Test with various repo sizes:
-- Small: 10 specs
-- Medium: 50 specs
-- Large: 200+ specs

package/.next/standalone/packages/ui/dist/standalone/specs/045-unified-dashboard/ACTUAL-IMPLEMENTATION.md

@@ -1,108 +0,0 @@
-# Actual Implementation Notes
-
-## What Was Built vs Original Plan
-
-### ✅ Implemented
-
-1. **Timestamp Tracking** (100% complete)
-   - `created_at`, `updated_at`, `completed_at` fields in frontmatter
-   - Optional `transitions` array for status change tracking
-   - Auto-enrichment on spec create/update operations
-   - Backward compatible with existing date fields
-   - Location: `src/frontmatter.ts`
-
-2. **Velocity Metrics** (100% complete)
-   - Cycle time calculation (created → completed)
-   - Lead time tracking (time in each status)
-   - Throughput metrics (specs per week/month with trends)
-   - WIP tracking (current and historical averages)
-   - Location: `src/utils/velocity.ts`
-
-3. **Enhanced Stats Command** (100% complete)
-   - New simplified default view with insights
-   - `--timeline` flag to add timeline section
-   - `--velocity` flag for cycle time analysis
-   - `--full` flag for comprehensive view
-   - Smart insights and completion tracking
-   - Location: `src/commands/stats.ts`
-
-4. **Board Command Enhancements** (100% complete)
-   - Integrated velocity summary
-   - Shows cycle time, throughput, WIP
-   - Project health indicators
-   - Location: `src/commands/board.ts`
-
-### ❌ Not Implemented
-
-1. **Dashboard Command** - Decided against creating a separate command
-   - Reason: Functionality better distributed across enhanced `stats` and `board` commands
-   - Keeps CLI surface area simpler
-   - No `lean-spec` default to dashboard (keeps help accessible)
-   - No separate dashboard.ts file
-
-2. **Timeline Command Deprecation** - Kept as-is
-   - Originally planned to deprecate/merge into stats
-   - Decided to keep both commands (serve different use cases)
-   - No user confusion or breaking changes needed
-
-## Design Decisions
-
-### Why No Dashboard Command?
-
-1. **Simplicity**: Enhanced `stats` and `board` provide comprehensive views without adding another command
-2. **Discoverability**: `lean-spec --help` remains the entry point (not a dashboard)
-3. **Focused Commands**: Each command has a clear, distinct purpose
-4. **No Feature Loss**: All planned dashboard functionality available via stats/board
-
-### Why Keep Timeline Command?
-
-1. **Different Use Case**: Timeline focuses on historical trends, stats on current metrics
-2. **No Redundancy**: After enhancements, they serve complementary purposes
-3. **No Breaking Changes**: Existing users rely on timeline command
-4. **User Choice**: Some prefer dedicated timeline view vs stats --timeline
-
-## File Locations
-
-```
-src/
-├── frontmatter.ts              # Timestamp enrichment logic
-├── commands/
-│   ├── stats.ts                # Enhanced with velocity, timeline, insights
-│   ├── board.ts                # Enhanced with velocity summary
-│   └── timeline.ts             # Kept unchanged
-└── utils/
-    ├── velocity.ts             # NEW: Velocity calculations
-    ├── completion.ts           # NEW: Completion metrics
-    ├── insights.ts             # NEW: Smart insights
-    └── spec-stats.ts           # NEW: Stat aggregations
-```
-
-## Success Metrics (All Achieved)
-
-- ✅ Timestamp tracking functional and auto-enriching
-- ✅ Velocity metrics calculating correctly (cycle time, throughput, WIP)
-- ✅ Stats command provides comprehensive analytics
-- ✅ Board command shows velocity summary
-- ✅ No breaking changes for existing users
-- ✅ Clean code separation (utilities in utils/)
-- ✅ Comprehensive test coverage
-
-## What's in v0.2.0
-
-Users get:
-- Precise timestamp tracking for all specs
-- Velocity metrics proving SDD effectiveness
-- Enhanced `lean-spec stats` with multiple view modes
-- Enhanced `lean-spec board` with velocity insights
-- Smart insights highlighting what needs attention
-- Completion tracking and project health metrics
-
-## Future Enhancements
-
-Potential additions post-v0.2.0:
-- Custom velocity targets via config
-- More granular lead time tracking
-- Velocity trend predictions
-- Export capabilities (JSON, CSV, HTML)
-- CI/CD integration for automated tracking
-- Per-tag/per-assignee velocity breakdowns