@leanspec/ui 0.2.6 → 0.2.7-dev.20251126090057

package/.next/standalone/packages/ui/dist/standalone/specs/055-readme-redesign-ai-first/README.md

@@ -1,280 +0,0 @@
----
-status: complete
-created: '2025-11-06'
-tags:
-  - documentation
-  - ux
-  - conversion
-  - marketing
-priority: high
-created_at: '2025-11-06T14:15:28.191Z'
-related:
-  - 049-leanspec-first-principles
-  - 043-official-launch-02
-updated_at: '2025-11-07T03:20:42.344Z'
-completed_at: '2025-11-07T03:20:42.344Z'
-completed: '2025-11-07'
-transitions:
-  - status: complete
-    at: '2025-11-07T03:20:42.344Z'
----
-
-# README Redesign: AI-First Positioning
-
-> **Status**: ✅ Complete · **Priority**: High · **Created**: 2025-11-06 · **Tags**: documentation, ux, conversion, marketing
-
-**Project**: lean-spec  
-**Team**: Core Development
-
-## Overview
-
-**Problem**: Current README doesn't effectively convey LeanSpec's value proposition or drive adoption:
-- **Buried lede**: Best value prop ("specs clear enough for AI to implement") is in paragraph 3
-- **Weak hook**: Generic tagline doesn't capture attention or communicate differentiation
-- **Abstract pain**: Problem statements are vague ("too heavy or too light")
-- **No social proof**: Missing validation that LeanSpec works in practice
-- **CTA diffusion**: Multiple competing calls-to-action reduce conversion
-
-**Solution**: Redesign README with AI-first developers as primary audience, leading with concrete context overflow pain, showing real examples, and demonstrating first principles through the README itself.
-
-**Why Now**: 
-- Post-launch timing (spec 043) - need strong positioning for growth
-- First principles documented (spec 049) - can now communicate them effectively
-- Dogfooding data available - 54 specs, 0 over 400 lines, proven methodology
-- AI-first development is mainstream - Cursor/Copilot/Aider adoption is high
-
-**Key Insight**: The README itself should DEMONSTRATE LeanSpec principles (context economy, signal-to-noise, etc.), not just describe them. "Show, don't tell."
-
-## Sub-Specs
-
-This spec includes detailed analysis and drafts in sub-specs:
-
-- **[ANALYSIS-PART1.md](ANALYSIS-PART1.md)** - Critical analysis & strategy (Parts 1-6)
-  - Current README critique, user journey, psychology, audience segmentation
-- **[ANALYSIS-PART2.md](ANALYSIS-PART2.md)** - Implementation recommendations (Parts 7-12)
-  - Content rewrites, visual enhancements, CTA strategy, success metrics
-- **[REDESIGN-DRAFT.md](REDESIGN-DRAFT.md)** - Complete proposed README
-  - Full rewritten content ready to adapt
-- **[CHANGES.md](CHANGES.md)** - Improvement summary
-  - Before/after comparison, metrics, implementation strategy
-- **[ANALYSIS.md](ANALYSIS.md)** - Index and quick reference
-  - Overview document linking to split analysis parts
-- **[CONCERNS-ANALYSIS.md](./CONCERNS-ANALYSIS.md)** - Potential concerns and objections analysis
-- **[DOCS-ALIGNMENT-ANALYSIS.md](./DOCS-ALIGNMENT-ANALYSIS.md)** - Documentation alignment and consistency review
-- **[REDESIGN-REFINED.md](./REDESIGN-REFINED.md)** - Refined redesign incorporating feedback and iterations
-
-## Design
-
-### Target Audience (Primary)
-
-**AI-First Developers** - Cursor, Copilot, Aider users who:
-- Experience AI context overflow daily
-- Want specs AI agents can act on
-- Need structure without heavyweight processes
-- Work solo or in small teams (2-5 people)
-
-**Message**: "Stop fighting AI context limits. LeanSpec keeps specs under 300 lines—short enough for AI to read, clear enough for AI to implement."
-
-### New Structure
-
-```
-1. HERO - Lead with concrete pain
-   "Your specs are too big for AI to read."
-   2,000 lines vs. 300 lines comparison
-   
-2. PROBLEM - 3 concrete scenarios
-   - Context Overflow (AI can't help)
-   - Stale Specs (nobody maintains)
-   - Process Paralysis (too heavy or too light)
-   
-3. SOLUTION - Show real example
-   Actual 287-line spec from project
-   Annotated to show principles
-   
-4. PRINCIPLES - Constraints not preferences
-   Icons + rationale + thresholds
-   Frame as physics/biology/economics
-   
-5. FEATURES - Connect to outcomes
-   AI-Native, Maintainable, Flexible
-   
-6. SOCIAL PROOF - We practice what we preach
-   54 specs, 287 avg lines, 0 over 400
-   Link to actual specs
-   
-7. SINGLE CTA - "5-Minute Challenge"
-   Time-bound, concrete steps, promise quick win
-   
-8. LEARN MORE - Progressive disclosure
-   Links for deep divers
-```
-
-### Content Strategy
-
-**Emotional Hooks:**
-1. **Pain**: "Your specs overflow AI context"
-2. **Frustration**: "Specs that nobody maintains"
-3. **Possibility**: "AI agents that implement features correctly"
-4. **Relief**: "5-minute updates, actually maintainable"
-
-**Persuasion Principles:**
-- **Specificity**: "300 lines" not "keep it lean"
-- **Contrast**: Before/after, old way vs. new
-- **Social proof**: Dogfooding stats, real examples
-- **Progressive commitment**: Small first step (5 minutes)
-
-**Key Messages:**
-- Primary: "Specs optimized for AI context windows"
-- Secondary: "Light enough to maintain, structured enough to work"
-- Tertiary: "Grows from solo dev to enterprise"
-
-### Differentiation
-
-| Alternative | LeanSpec Advantage |
-|-------------|-------------------|
-| Traditional RFCs | 300 lines vs. 2000, fits in AI context |
-| ADRs | Full workflow (board, stats), not just decisions |
-| Linear/Jira | Markdown specs, AI-readable, version controlled |
-| "Just code" | Structure for AI agents + team alignment |
-
-## Plan
-
-### Phase 1: Quick Wins (High Impact, 2-3 hours)
-- [ ] Rewrite hero section with "specs too big" hook
-- [ ] Add before/after visual (2000 lines vs. 300)
-- [ ] Replace abstract bullets with 3 concrete scenarios
-- [ ] Add "We Practice What We Preach" section with dogfooding stats
-- [ ] Simplify CTA to single "5-Minute Challenge"
-- [ ] Update frontmatter (tags: documentation, ux, conversion, marketing)
-
-### Phase 2: Show Don't Tell (Medium Impact, 3-4 hours)
-- [ ] Add real spec example (pick best 287-line spec)
-- [ ] Annotate example to highlight principles
-- [ ] Enhance principles section with icons + "why fundamental"
-- [ ] Reframe principles as constraints (physics/biology/economics)
-- [ ] Improve spacing and formatting for scannability
-- [ ] Add "When to Use/Skip" comparison table
-
-### Phase 3: Visual Enhancement (Medium Impact, 4-5 hours)
-- [ ] Create or find icons for 5 principles
-- [ ] Improve table layouts
-- [ ] Add emoji landmarks strategically
-- [ ] Consider demo GIF of CLI (create → view → board)
-- [ ] Optimize for mobile viewing
-
-### Phase 4: Social Proof (Collect Over Time)
-- [ ] Gather user testimonials
-- [ ] Add "Used by" section if applicable
-- [ ] Create case studies
-- [ ] Track and display usage stats
-
-### Phase 5: Measure & Iterate
-- [ ] Track npm install rate (before/after)
-- [ ] Monitor GitHub stars growth
-- [ ] Track documentation engagement
-- [ ] Collect user feedback
-- [ ] A/B test if possible
-
-## Test
-
-### Success Criteria
-
-**Leading Indicators (Week 1-2):**
-- [ ] ⬆️ 40-60% increase in npm install rate
-- [ ] ⬆️ Improved scroll depth (% who read to CTA)
-- [ ] ⬆️ Higher click-through to documentation
-- [ ] User feedback: "I installed because..." mentions concrete hook
-
-**Lagging Indicators (Month 1-3):**
-- [ ] ⬆️ 30-50% better retention (% who create 5+ specs)
-- [ ] ⬆️ Increased GitHub stars
-- [ ] ⬆️ Word of mouth (Twitter mentions, blog posts)
-- [ ] ⬇️ 20-30% reduction in "what is this?" questions
-
-**Quality Check:**
-- [ ] README demonstrates LeanSpec principles (context economy, signal-to-noise)
-- [ ] Primary audience (AI-first developers) can identify themselves immediately
-- [ ] Value proposition is clear within 10 seconds
-- [ ] CTA has single clear action
-- [ ] Social proof builds trust
-
-### Validation Questions
-
-Before launching:
-- [ ] Does hero hook grab attention in 3 seconds?
-- [ ] Are problem scenarios relatable and concrete?
-- [ ] Does the example spec prove it works?
-- [ ] Are principles framed as constraints, not preferences?
-- [ ] Is the CTA compelling and low-friction?
-- [ ] Does the README itself follow LeanSpec principles?
-
-## Notes
-
-### Analysis Documents
-
-Created comprehensive analysis in:
-- **[ANALYSIS.md](ANALYSIS.md)** - 12-part deep dive (6,500 words)
-  - Critical analysis of current README
-  - User journey & conversion funnel
-  - Psychology & persuasion principles
-  - Audience segmentation
-  - Structural recommendations
-  - Success metrics
-- **[REDESIGN-DRAFT.md](REDESIGN-DRAFT.md)** - Complete rewritten README with rationale
-  - Full draft content ready to adapt
-  - Before/after comparisons
-  - Philosophy alignment notes
-
-### Key Insights from Analysis
-
-1. **Successful dev tool pattern**: Single superpower + instant "aha moment" + concrete proof
-   - Vite: "Instant server start" + demo
-   - Cursor: "AI writes code" + videos
-   - LeanSpec: "Fits in AI context" + before/after
-
-2. **Current weaknesses ranked**:
-   - Buried lede (highest impact to fix)
-   - Weak emotional hook
-   - No social proof
-   - CTA diffusion
-   - Generic positioning
-
-3. **Psychology principles**:
-   - Specificity beats abstraction ("300 lines" > "keep it lean")
-   - Contrast creates clarity (show old vs. new)
-   - Social proof removes risk (dogfooding stats)
-   - Progressive commitment (small first step)
-
-4. **Target audience clarity**: Focus on AI-first developers (80% of potential users), secondary appeal to engineering leaders at scaling startups
-
-### Alternatives Considered
-
-**Option A: Manifesto Style**
-- Lead with bold statement, challenge status quo
-- **Rejected**: Too confrontational, alienates some users
-
-**Option B: Tutorial Style**
-- Walk through creating first spec
-- **Rejected**: Too long, README isn't tutorial
-
-**Option C: Technical Deep-Dive**
-- Explain architecture, how it works
-- **Rejected**: Wrong audience for README
-
-**Option D: Problem-Solution-Principles** ✅
-- Hook with pain → Show solution → Ground in principles → CTA
-- **Selected**: Best balance of persuasion + philosophy
-
-### Implementation Notes
-
-- Start with Phase 1 (highest impact, lowest effort)
-- User will polish content after structure is in place
-- Track metrics to validate changes
-- Iterate based on feedback
-- **REDESIGN-DRAFT.md references**: Contains paths like `../../AGENTS.md` which are correct for root README placement. Validator warnings about broken references are expected since the draft is currently in the spec folder but designed for the project root.
-
-### Related Work
-
-- Spec 049: First principles documented (foundation for this work)
-- Spec 043: Official launch context
-- Dogfooding: 54 specs provide social proof data

package/.next/standalone/packages/ui/dist/standalone/specs/055-readme-redesign-ai-first/REDESIGN-DRAFT.md

@@ -1,372 +0,0 @@
-# LeanSpec README Redesign - Draft Version
-
-> **Note**: This is a proposed redesign based on deep analysis.  
-> **See**: [ANALYSIS-PART1.md](ANALYSIS-PART1.md) & [ANALYSIS-PART2.md](ANALYSIS-PART2.md) for full rationale | [CHANGES.md](CHANGES.md) for improvements summary
-
----
-
-# LeanSpec
-
-<p align="center">
-  <img src="docs-site/static/img/logo-with-bg.svg" alt="LeanSpec Logo" width="120" height="120">
-</p>
-
-<p align="center">
-  <a href="https://www.npmjs.com/package/lean-spec"><img src="https://img.shields.io/npm/v/lean-spec.svg" alt="npm version"></a>
-  <a href="https://www.npmjs.com/package/lean-spec"><img src="https://img.shields.io/npm/dm/lean-spec.svg" alt="npm downloads"></a>
-  <a href="LICENSE"><img src="https://img.shields.io/badge/license-MIT-blue.svg" alt="License"></a>
-</p>
-
----
-
-## Your specs are too big for AI to read.
-
-Traditional specs overflow AI context windows. Your AI agent can't help because it can't fit the full context.
-
-```diff
-- 2,000-line RFC → "Context too large" → AI hallucinates
-+ 287-line LeanSpec → Fits perfectly → AI implements correctly
-```
-
-**LeanSpec: Spec-Driven Development for human + AI collaboration.**
-
-Specs under 300 lines. Intent-focused. Machine-readable. The SDD methodology designed for the AI era.
-
-<p align="center">
-  <a href="#try-it-now-5-minutes"><strong>Try It Now (5 Minutes) →</strong></a> •
-  <a href="https://www.lean-spec.dev"><strong>Documentation</strong></a> •
-  <a href="https://www.lean-spec.dev/docs/examples"><strong>Examples</strong></a>
-</p>
-
----
-
-## The Problem with Traditional SDD
-
-### Scenario 1: The Context Overflow 🔴
-
-You paste your 2,000-line RFC into Cursor. **"Context too large."** AI can't help. You're back to manual implementation.
-
-### Scenario 2: The Stale Spec 📄
-
-Your team has beautiful specs. None of them match the current code. Nobody updates them because it's too painful. They're dead on arrival.
-
-### Scenario 3: The Process Paralysis ⚖️
-
-You tried heavyweight RFCs—too slow, nobody maintains them. You tried "just code"—AI agents get lost, team misaligns. Where's the middle ground?
-
-**LeanSpec solves this:**
-- ✅ Specs fit in AI context windows (<300 lines)
-- ✅ Light enough to actually maintain (5 min updates)
-- ✅ Structured enough for AI agents to act on
-- ✅ Flexible enough to grow with your team
-
----
-
-## How It Works
-
-### A LeanSpec in Action
-
-Here's a real spec from this project (287 lines):
-
-```yaml
----
-status: in-progress
-created: 2025-11-01
-tags: [cli, dx]
-priority: high
----
-
-# Unified Dashboard
-
-## Overview
-Combine `lean-spec board` and `lean-spec stats` into a single, comprehensive
-project health view. Give users instant insight into project status,
-bottlenecks, and team velocity.
-
-## Design
-- Board view (Kanban columns)
-- Key metrics (completion rate, avg spec size)
-- Bottleneck detection (specs >400 lines, stale specs)
-- Health score (0-100)
-
-## Plan
-1. Merge board + stats logic
-2. Add health scoring algorithm
-3. Implement bottleneck detection
-4. Add color-coded indicators
-
-## Success Criteria
-- Shows full project state in <5 seconds
-- Identifies bottlenecks automatically
-- Used daily by team leads
-```
-
-**Notice:**
-- ✅ Under 300 lines (fits in AI context)
-- ✅ Intent is clear ("what" and "why")
-- ✅ Implementation details are minimal
-- ✅ Both human and AI can understand
-- ✅ Structured metadata (status, tags, priority)
-
----
-
-## Built on First Principles
-
-LeanSpec isn't arbitrary rules—it's derived from fundamental constraints of working with AI.
-
-### 🧠 Context Economy
-**Specs <300 lines → Fit in working memory**
-
-- Physics: AI context windows are bounded (~20K effective tokens)
-- Biology: Human working memory is limited (7±2 items)
-- Economics: Large contexts cost more time and money
-- **Result**: Keep specs under 300 lines, split complex features into sub-specs
-
-### ✂️ Signal-to-Noise Maximization
-**Every word informs decisions → Or it's cut**
-
-- Every sentence must answer: "What decision does this inform?"
-- Cut obvious statements, inferable content, "maybe future" speculation
-- Keep decision rationale, constraints, success criteria
-- **Result**: Dense, actionable specs that respect reader attention
-
-### 📈 Progressive Disclosure
-**Add structure only when you feel pain → Start simple**
-
-- Solo dev: Just `status` + `created`
-- Small team: Add `tags` + `priority`
-- Enterprise: Add custom fields as needed
-- **Result**: Structure adapts to team size, not the other way around
-
-### 🎯 Intent Over Implementation
-**Capture "why" → Let "how" emerge**
-
-- Must have: Problem, intent, success criteria
-- Should have: Design rationale, trade-offs
-- Could have: Implementation details (these change)
-- **Result**: Specs stay relevant as implementation evolves
-
-### 🌉 Bridge the Gap
-**Both humans AND AI must understand → Clear structure + natural language**
-
-- For humans: Overview, context, rationale
-- For AI: Unambiguous requirements, structured metadata, examples
-- Both can parse and reason about specs
-- **Result**: Specs that enable human-AI collaboration
-
----
-
-**These aren't preferences—they're constraints.** Physics (context windows), biology (working memory), and economics (token costs) dictate what works.
-
-📖 [Deep dive: First Principles Guide →](https://www.lean-spec.dev/docs/guide/first-principles)
-
----
-
-## Features Designed for AI-First Development
-
-<table>
-<tr>
-<td width="50%" valign="top">
-
-### 🤖 AI-Native Integration
-
-Works seamlessly with:
-- **Cursor** / **Copilot** - Give agents full context
-- **Aider** - Structured specs for autonomous coding
-- **Claude** via MCP - Direct spec access in conversations
-
-Clear specs = better code generation. Simple.
-
-</td>
-<td width="50%" valign="top">
-
-### 📊 Built-in Workflow Tools
-
-Track progress without leaving the terminal:
-
-```bash
-$ lean-spec board
-┌──────────────────────────────────┐
-│ 📋 PLANNED │ 🚧 IN PROGRESS │ ✅ DONE │
-│ • api-v2   │ • user-auth    │ • cli  │
-│ • dashboard│ • db-migration │ • docs │
-└──────────────────────────────────┘
-```
-
-</td>
-</tr>
-<tr>
-<td width="50%" valign="top">
-
-### 🎨 Flexible Structure
-
-Start minimal, add complexity progressively:
-
-```yaml
-# Day 1: Solo dev
-status: planned
-
-# Week 2: Small team
-status: in-progress
-tags: [api, feature]
-priority: high
-
-# Month 3: Enterprise
-assignee: alice
-epic: PROJ-123
-sprint: 2025-Q4-S3
-```
-
-Custom fields supported. Adapts to your workflow.
-
-</td>
-<td width="50%" valign="top">
-
-### ⚡ Actually Maintainable
-
-**Why specs get stale:** They're too painful to update.
-
-**LeanSpec solution:**
-- Short specs = 5 min updates
-- CLI tools = easy viewing/editing
-- Structured format = AI can help update
-- Living docs = evolve with code
-
-**Result:** Specs that stay in sync.
-
-</td>
-</tr>
-</table>
-
----
-
-## Try It Now (5 Minutes)
-
-```bash
-# Install
-npm install -g lean-spec
-
-# Initialize in your project
-cd your-project
-lean-spec init
-
-# Create your first spec
-lean-spec create user-authentication
-
-# View it
-lean-spec view user-authentication
-
-# See the Kanban board
-lean-spec board
-```
-
-**What you'll discover:**
-- ✅ Creating a spec takes <2 minutes
-- ✅ Structure is clear, not constraining  
-- ✅ You can start simple, add fields later
-- ✅ AI agents can immediately work with it
-
-**Next steps:**
-- 📘 [Full CLI Reference](https://www.lean-spec.dev/docs/cli-reference) - All commands with examples
-- 🎨 [Choose a Template](https://www.lean-spec.dev/docs/templates) - Minimal, standard, or enterprise
-- 🤖 [AI Agent Setup](../../AGENTS.md) - Configure Cursor, Claude, Aider
-
----
-
-## Who's Using LeanSpec
-
-### AI-First Development Teams
-Give agents clear context without context window overload. Works with Cursor, Copilot, Aider, Claude.
-
-### Scaling Startups
-One methodology from solo dev → team → enterprise. Add structure progressively as you grow.
-
-### Teams Outgrowing "Just Code"
-Need structure for AI agents and team alignment, but heavyweight processes are too slow.
-
-### Developers Building AI Agents
-MCP-native specs for autonomous coding workflows. Structured input format agents can parse reliably.
-
----
-
-## We Practice What We Preach
-
-<table>
-<tr>
-<td align="center" width="25%">
-<strong>54</strong><br>
-Specs
-</td>
-<td align="center" width="25%">
-<strong>287</strong><br>
-Avg lines
-</td>
-<td align="center" width="25%">
-<strong>0</strong><br>
-Over 400 lines
-</td>
-<td align="center" width="25%">
-<strong>547</strong><br>
-Updates in 6mo
-</td>
-</tr>
-</table>
-
-**LeanSpec is built using LeanSpec.** Every feature, refactor, and design decision has a spec. All specs follow the first principles. We dogfood our own methodology.
-
-→ [Browse our specs](https://github.com/codervisor/lean-spec/tree/main/specs)
-
----
-
-## When to Use (and Skip) Specs
-
-| Use LeanSpec When: | Skip It When: |
-|---------------------|---------------|
-| ✅ Features span multiple files/components | ❌ Trivial bug fixes |
-| ✅ Architecture decisions need alignment | ❌ Self-explanatory refactors |
-| ✅ Guiding AI agents on complex features | ❌ Pure API reference (use code comments) |
-| ✅ Design rationale should be documented | ❌ Quick experiments |
-| ✅ Team needs to coordinate work | ❌ Changes are obvious |
-
-**Philosophy:** Write specs when they add clarity. Skip them when they don't.
-
----
-
-## Learn More
-
-### 📚 Documentation
-- [Getting Started Guide](https://www.lean-spec.dev/docs/getting-started) - Complete setup walkthrough
-- [First Principles](https://www.lean-spec.dev/docs/guide/first-principles) - The philosophy behind LeanSpec
-- [CLI Reference](https://www.lean-spec.dev/docs/cli-reference) - All commands with examples
-
-### 🛠️ Integrations
-- [AI Agent Configuration](../../AGENTS.md) - Cursor, Copilot, Aider setup
-- [MCP Server](../../docs/MCP-SERVER.md) - Claude Desktop integration
-- [VS Code Extension](https://www.lean-spec.dev/docs/tools/vscode) - Enhanced editor support
-
-### 🎓 Guides
-- [Custom Fields](https://www.lean-spec.dev/docs/guide/custom-fields) - Adapt to your workflow
-- [Sub-Specs](https://www.lean-spec.dev/docs/guide/sub-specs) - Manage complex features
-- [Folder Structure](https://www.lean-spec.dev/docs/guide/folder-structure) - Organize your specs
-
-### 🤝 Community
-- [GitHub Issues](https://github.com/codervisor/lean-spec/issues) - Report bugs or request features
-- [Contributing Guide](../../CONTRIBUTING.md) - Join the project
-- [Examples](https://www.lean-spec.dev/docs/examples) - Real-world usage patterns
-
----
-
-## License
-
-MIT - See [LICENSE](LICENSE)
-
----
-
-<p align="center">
-  <strong>Built for developers who want SDD without the overhead.</strong><br>
-  Keep your specs short. Keep them clear. Keep them useful.
-</p>
-
----
-
-> **See**: [CHANGES.md](CHANGES.md) for detailed comparison with current README and implementation strategy.