@league-of-foundry-developers/foundry-vtt-types 13.340.0 → 13.340.1

package/src/foundry/common/documents/combat.d.mts

@@ -1,8 +1,8 @@
+import type { AnyObject } from "fvtt-types/utils";
+import type DataModel from "../abstract/data.d.mts";
 import type Document from "../abstract/document.mts";
-import type * as fields from "../data/fields.d.mts";
-import type * as documents from "./_module.mts";
-
-type DataSchema = foundry.data.fields.DataSchema;
+import type { DataField, SchemaField } from "../data/fields.d.mts";
+import type { LogCompatibilityWarningOptions } from "../utils/logging.d.mts";
 
 /**
  * The Combat Document.
@@ -11,15 +11,23 @@ type DataSchema = foundry.data.fields.DataSchema;
 // Note(LukeAbby): You may wonder why documents don't simply pass the `Parent` generic parameter.
 // This pattern evolved from trying to avoid circular loops and even internal tsc errors.
 // See: https://gist.github.com/LukeAbby/0d01b6e20ef19ebc304d7d18cef9cc21
-declare class BaseCombat extends Document<"Combat", BaseCombat.Schema, any> {
+declare abstract class BaseCombat<out SubType extends BaseCombat.SubType = BaseCombat.SubType> extends Document<
+  "Combat",
+  BaseCombat._Schema,
+  any
+> {
   /**
-   * @param data    - Initial data from which to construct the Combat
+   * @param data    - Initial data from which to construct the `BaseCombat`
    * @param context - Construction context options
+   *
+   * @deprecated Constructing `BaseCombat` directly is not advised. The base document classes exist in
+   * order to use documents on both the client (i.e. where all your code runs) and behind the scenes
+   * on the server to manage document validation and storage.
+   *
+   * You should use {@link Combat.implementation | `new Combat.implementation(...)`} instead which will give you
+   * a system specific implementation of `Combat`.
    */
-  // TODO(LukeAbby): This constructor is a symptom of a circular error.
-  // constructor(data?: BaseCombat.ConstructorData, context?: Document.ConstructionContext<BaseCombat.Parent>);
-
-  override parent: BaseCombat.Parent;
+  constructor(...args: Combat.ConstructorArgs);
 
   static override metadata: BaseCombat.Metadata;
 
@@ -29,104 +37,305 @@ declare class BaseCombat extends Document<"Combat", BaseCombat.Schema, any> {
    * Is a user able to update an existing Combat?
    * @internal
    */
-  static #canUpdate(user: User, doc: BaseCombat, data: BaseCombat.UpdateData): boolean;
+  static #canUpdate(user: User.Implementation, doc: BaseCombat, data: BaseCombat.UpdateData): boolean;
 
   /**
    * Can a certain User change the Combat round?
    * @param user - The user attempting to change the round
    * @returns Is the user allowed to change the round?
    */
-  protected _canChangeRound(user: User.ConfiguredInstance): boolean;
+  protected _canChangeRound(user: User.Implementation): boolean;
 
   /**
    * Can a certain User change the Combat turn?
    * @param user - The user attempting to change the turn
    * @returns Is the user allowed to change the turn?
    */
-  protected _canChangeTurn(user: User.ConfiguredInstance): boolean;
+  protected _canChangeTurn(user: User.Implementation): boolean;
+
+  /*
+   * After this point these are not really overridden methods.
+   * They are here because Foundry's documents are complex and have lots of edge cases.
+   * There are DRY ways of representing this but this ends up being harder to understand
+   * for end users extending these functions, especially for static methods. There are also a
+   * number of methods that don't make sense to call directly on `Document` like `createDocuments`,
+   * as there is no data that can safely construct every possible document. Finally keeping definitions
+   * separate like this helps against circularities.
+   */
+
+  /* Document overrides */
+
+  static " fvtt_types_internal_document_name_static": "Combat";
+
+  // Same as Document for now
+  protected static override _initializationOrder(): Generator<[string, DataField.Any]>;
+
+  readonly parentCollection: Combat.ParentCollectionName | null;
+
+  readonly pack: string | null;
+
+  static get implementation(): Combat.ImplementationClass;
+
+  static get baseDocument(): typeof BaseCombat;
+
+  static get collectionName(): Combat.ParentCollectionName;
+
+  static get documentName(): Combat.Name;
+
+  static get TYPES(): BaseCombat.SubType[];
+
+  static get hasTypeData(): true;
+
+  static get hierarchy(): Combat.Hierarchy;
+
+  override system: Combat.SystemOfType<SubType>;
+
+  override parent: BaseCombat.Parent;
+
+  static createDocuments<Temporary extends boolean | undefined = false>(
+    data: Array<Combat.Implementation | Combat.CreateData> | undefined,
+    operation?: Document.Database.CreateOperation<Combat.Database.Create<Temporary>>,
+  ): Promise<Array<Document.TemporaryIf<Combat.Implementation, Temporary>>>;
+
+  static updateDocuments(
+    updates: Combat.UpdateData[] | undefined,
+    operation?: Document.Database.UpdateDocumentsOperation<Combat.Database.Update>,
+  ): Promise<Combat.Implementation[]>;
+
+  static deleteDocuments(
+    ids: readonly string[] | undefined,
+    operation?: Document.Database.DeleteDocumentsOperation<Combat.Database.Delete>,
+  ): Promise<Combat.Implementation[]>;
+
+  static override create<Temporary extends boolean | undefined = false>(
+    data: Combat.CreateData | Combat.CreateData[],
+    operation?: Combat.Database.CreateOperation<Temporary>,
+  ): Promise<Document.TemporaryIf<Combat.Implementation, Temporary> | undefined>;
+
+  override update(
+    data: Combat.UpdateData | undefined,
+    operation?: Combat.Database.UpdateOperation,
+  ): Promise<this | undefined>;
+
+  override delete(operation?: Combat.Database.DeleteOperation): Promise<this | undefined>;
+
+  static override get(documentId: string, options?: Combat.Database.GetOptions): Combat.Implementation | null;
+
+  static override getCollectionName<CollectionName extends Combat.Embedded.Name>(
+    name: CollectionName,
+  ): Combat.Embedded.CollectionNameOf<CollectionName> | null;
+
+  override getEmbeddedCollection<EmbeddedName extends Combat.Embedded.CollectionName>(
+    embeddedName: EmbeddedName,
+  ): Combat.Embedded.CollectionFor<EmbeddedName>;
+
+  override getEmbeddedDocument<EmbeddedName extends Combat.Embedded.CollectionName>(
+    embeddedName: EmbeddedName,
+    id: string,
+    options: Document.GetEmbeddedDocumentOptions,
+  ): Combat.Embedded.DocumentFor<EmbeddedName> | undefined;
+
+  override createEmbeddedDocuments<EmbeddedName extends Combat.Embedded.Name>(
+    embeddedName: EmbeddedName,
+    data: Document.CreateDataForName<EmbeddedName>[] | undefined,
+    // TODO(LukeAbby): The correct signature would be:
+    // operation?: Document.Database.CreateOperation<Document.Database.CreateForName<EmbeddedName>>,
+    // However this causes a number of errors.
+    operation?: object,
+  ): Promise<Array<Document.Stored<Document.ImplementationFor<EmbeddedName>>> | undefined>;
+
+  override updateEmbeddedDocuments<EmbeddedName extends Combat.Embedded.Name>(
+    embeddedName: EmbeddedName,
+    updates: Document.UpdateDataForName<EmbeddedName>[] | undefined,
+    operation?: Document.Database.UpdateOperationForName<EmbeddedName>,
+  ): Promise<Array<Document.Stored<Document.ImplementationFor<EmbeddedName>>> | undefined>;
+
+  override deleteEmbeddedDocuments<EmbeddedName extends Combat.Embedded.Name>(
+    embeddedName: EmbeddedName,
+    ids: Array<string>,
+    operation?: Document.Database.DeleteOperationForName<EmbeddedName>,
+  ): Promise<Array<Document.Stored<Document.ImplementationFor<EmbeddedName>>>>;
+
+  // Same as Document for now
+  override traverseEmbeddedDocuments(_parentPath?: string): Generator<[string, Document.AnyChild<this>]>;
+
+  override getFlag<Scope extends Combat.Flags.Scope, Key extends Combat.Flags.Key<Scope>>(
+    scope: Scope,
+    key: Key,
+  ): Document.GetFlag<Combat.Name, Scope, Key>;
+
+  override setFlag<
+    Scope extends Combat.Flags.Scope,
+    Key extends Combat.Flags.Key<Scope>,
+    Value extends Document.GetFlag<Combat.Name, Scope, Key>,
+  >(scope: Scope, key: Key, value: Value): Promise<this>;
 
-  // BaseCombat implements _preUpdate but leaving out here for type computation reasons
+  override unsetFlag<Scope extends Combat.Flags.Scope, Key extends Combat.Flags.Key<Scope>>(
+    scope: Scope,
+    key: Key,
+  ): Promise<this>;
+
+  protected _preCreate(
+    data: Combat.CreateData,
+    options: Combat.Database.PreCreateOptions,
+    user: User.Implementation,
+  ): Promise<boolean | void>;
+
+  protected _onCreate(data: Combat.CreateData, options: Combat.Database.OnCreateOperation, userId: string): void;
+
+  protected static _preCreateOperation(
+    documents: Combat.Implementation[],
+    operation: Document.Database.PreCreateOperationStatic<Combat.Database.Create>,
+    user: User.Implementation,
+  ): Promise<boolean | void>;
+
+  protected static _onCreateOperation(
+    documents: Combat.Implementation[],
+    operation: Combat.Database.Create,
+    user: User.Implementation,
+  ): Promise<void>;
+
+  protected _preUpdate(
+    changed: Combat.UpdateData,
+    options: Combat.Database.PreUpdateOptions,
+    user: User.Implementation,
+  ): Promise<boolean | void>;
+
+  protected _onUpdate(changed: Combat.UpdateData, options: Combat.Database.OnUpdateOperation, userId: string): void;
+
+  protected static _preUpdateOperation(
+    documents: Combat.Implementation[],
+    operation: Combat.Database.Update,
+    user: User.Implementation,
+  ): Promise<boolean | void>;
+
+  protected static _onUpdateOperation(
+    documents: Combat.Implementation[],
+    operation: Combat.Database.Update,
+    user: User.Implementation,
+  ): Promise<void>;
+
+  protected _preDelete(options: Combat.Database.PreDeleteOptions, user: User.Implementation): Promise<boolean | void>;
+
+  protected _onDelete(options: Combat.Database.OnDeleteOperation, userId: string): void;
+
+  protected static _preDeleteOperation(
+    documents: Combat.Implementation[],
+    operation: Combat.Database.Delete,
+    user: User.Implementation,
+  ): Promise<boolean | void>;
+
+  protected static _onDeleteOperation(
+    documents: Combat.Implementation[],
+    operation: Combat.Database.Delete,
+    user: User.Implementation,
+  ): Promise<void>;
+
+  static get hasSystemData(): true;
+
+  // These data field things have been ticketed but will probably go into backlog hell for a while.
+  // We'll end up copy and pasting without modification for now I think. It makes it a tiny bit easier to update though.
+  protected static _addDataFieldShims(data: AnyObject, shims: AnyObject, options?: Document.DataFieldShimOptions): void;
+
+  protected static _addDataFieldMigration(
+    data: AnyObject,
+    oldKey: string,
+    newKey: string,
+    apply?: (data: AnyObject) => unknown,
+  ): unknown;
+
+  protected static _logDataFieldMigration(
+    oldKey: string,
+    newKey: string,
+    options?: LogCompatibilityWarningOptions,
+  ): void;
+
+  protected static _onCreateDocuments(
+    documents: Combat.Implementation[],
+    context: Document.ModificationContext<Combat.Parent>,
+  ): Promise<void>;
+
+  protected static _onUpdateDocuments(
+    documents: Combat.Implementation[],
+    context: Document.ModificationContext<Combat.Parent>,
+  ): Promise<void>;
+
+  protected static _onDeleteDocuments(
+    documents: Combat.Implementation[],
+    context: Document.ModificationContext<Combat.Parent>,
+  ): Promise<void>;
+
+  /* DataModel overrides */
+
+  protected static _schema: SchemaField<Combat.Schema>;
+
+  static get schema(): SchemaField<Combat.Schema>;
+
+  static validateJoint(data: Combat.Source): void;
+
+  static override fromSource(
+    source: Combat.CreateData,
+    { strict, ...context }?: DataModel.FromSourceOptions,
+  ): Combat.Implementation;
+
+  static override fromJSON(json: string): Combat.Implementation;
 }
 
 export default BaseCombat;
 
 declare namespace BaseCombat {
-  type Parent = null;
-
-  type TypeNames = Game.Model.TypeNames<"Combat">;
-
-  type Metadata = Document.MetadataFor<BaseCombat>;
-
-  type SchemaField = fields.SchemaField<Schema>;
-  type ConstructorData = fields.SchemaField.InnerConstructorType<Schema>;
-  type UpdateData = fields.SchemaField.InnerAssignmentType<Schema>;
-  type Properties = fields.SchemaField.InnerInitializedType<Schema>;
-  type Source = fields.SchemaField.InnerPersistedType<Schema>;
-
-  interface Schema extends DataSchema {
-    /**
-     * The _id which uniquely identifies this Combat document
-     * @defaultValue `null`
-     */
-    _id: fields.DocumentIdField;
-
-    type: fields.DocumentTypeField<typeof BaseCombat, { initial: typeof foundry.CONST.BASE_DOCUMENT_TYPE }>;
-
-    system: fields.TypeDataField<typeof BaseCombat>;
-
-    /**
-     * The _id of a Scene within which this Combat occurs
-     * @defaultValue `null`
-     */
-    scene: fields.ForeignDocumentField<typeof documents.BaseScene>;
-
-    /**
-     * A Collection of Combatant embedded Documents
-     * @defaultValue `[]`
-     */
-    combatants: fields.EmbeddedCollectionField<typeof documents.BaseCombatant, Combat.ConfiguredInstance>;
-
-    /**
-     * Is the Combat encounter currently active?
-     * @defaultValue `false`
-     */
-    active: fields.BooleanField;
-
-    /**
-     * The current round of the Combat encounter
-     * @defaultValue `0`
-     */
-    round: fields.NumberField<{
-      required: true;
-      nullable: false;
-      integer: true;
-      min: 0;
-      initial: 0;
-      label: "COMBAT.Round";
-    }>;
-
-    /**
-     * The current turn in the Combat round
-     * @defaultValue `null`
-     */
-    turn: fields.NumberField<{ required: true; integer: true; min: 0; initial: null; label: "COMBAT.Turn" }>;
-
-    /**
-     * The current sort order of this Combat relative to others in the same Scene
-     * @defaultValue `0`
-     */
-    sort: fields.IntegerSortField;
-
-    /**
-     * An object of optional key/value flags
-     * @defaultValue `{}`
-     */
-    flags: fields.ObjectField.FlagsField<"Combat">;
-
-    /**
-     * An object of creation and access information
-     * @defaultValue see {@link fields.DocumentStatsField}
-     */
-    _stats: fields.DocumentStatsField;
+  export import Name = Combat.Name;
+  export import ConstructorArgs = Combat.ConstructorArgs;
+  export import Hierarchy = Combat.Hierarchy;
+  export import Metadata = Combat.Metadata;
+  export import SubType = Combat.SubType;
+  export import ConfiguredSubTypes = Combat.ConfiguredSubTypes;
+  export import Known = Combat.Known;
+  export import OfType = Combat.OfType;
+  export import SystemOfType = Combat.SystemOfType;
+  export import Parent = Combat.Parent;
+  export import Descendant = Combat.Descendant;
+  export import DescendantClass = Combat.DescendantClass;
+  export import Pack = Combat.Pack;
+  export import Embedded = Combat.Embedded;
+  export import ParentCollectionName = Combat.ParentCollectionName;
+  export import CollectionClass = Combat.CollectionClass;
+  export import Collection = Combat.Collection;
+  export import Invalid = Combat.Invalid;
+  export import Stored = Combat.Stored;
+  export import Source = Combat.Source;
+  export import PersistedData = Combat.PersistedData;
+  export import CreateData = Combat.CreateData;
+  export import InitializedData = Combat.InitializedData;
+  export import UpdateData = Combat.UpdateData;
+  export import Schema = Combat.Schema;
+  export import DatabaseOperation = Combat.Database;
+  export import Flags = Combat.Flags;
+
+  // The document subclasses override `system` anyways.
+  // There's no point in doing expensive computation work comparing the base class system.
+  /** @internal */
+  interface _Schema extends Combat.Schema {
+    system: any;
   }
+
+  /**
+   * @deprecated This type is used by Foundry too vaguely.
+   * In one context the most correct type is after initialization whereas in another one it should be
+   * before but Foundry uses it interchangeably.
+   */
+  type Properties = SchemaField.InitializedData<Schema>;
+
+  /** @deprecated {@link BaseCombat.SubType | `BaseCombat.SubType`} */
+  type TypeNames = SubType;
+
+  /**
+   * @deprecated {@link foundry.data.fields.SchemaField | `SchemaField<BaseCombat.Schema>`}
+   */
+  type SchemaField = foundry.data.fields.SchemaField<Schema>;
+
+  /**
+   * @deprecated {@link BaseCombat.CreateData | `BaseCombat.CreateData`}
+   */
+  type ConstructorData = BaseCombat.CreateData;
 }