@league-of-foundry-developers/foundry-vtt-types 12.331.3-beta → 12.331.4-beta

package/src/foundry/common/documents/region-behavior.d.mts

@@ -0,0 +1,329 @@
+import type { AnyObject } from "../../../utils/index.d.mts";
+import type DataModel from "../abstract/data.d.mts";
+import type Document from "../abstract/document.mts";
+import type { DataField, SchemaField } from "../data/fields.d.mts";
+import type { LogCompatibilityWarningOptions } from "../utils/logging.d.mts";
+
+/**
+ * The RegionBehavior Document.
+ * Defines the DataSchema and common behaviors for a RegionBehavior which are shared between both client and server.
+ */
+declare abstract class BaseRegionBehavior<
+  out SubType extends BaseRegionBehavior.SubType = BaseRegionBehavior.SubType,
+> extends Document<"RegionBehavior", BaseRegionBehavior._Schema, any> {
+  #baseRegionBehavior: true;
+
+  /**
+   * @param data    - Initial data from which to construct the `BaseRegionBehavior`
+   * @param context - Construction context options
+   *
+   * @deprecated Constructing `BaseRegionBehavior` directly is not advised. The base document classes exist in
+   * order to use documents on both the client (i.e. where all your code runs) and behind the scenes
+   * on the server to manage document validation and storage.
+   *
+   * You should use {@link RegionBehavior.implementation | `new RegionBehavior.implementation(...)`} instead which will give you
+   * a system specific implementation of `RegionBehavior`.
+   */
+  constructor(...args: RegionBehavior.ConstructorArgs);
+
+  /**
+   * @defaultValue
+   * ```js
+   * mergeObject(super.metadata, {
+   *   name: "RegionBehavior",
+   *   collection: "behaviors",
+   *   label: "DOCUMENT.RegionBehavior",
+   *   labelPlural: "DOCUMENT.RegionBehaviors",
+   *   coreTypes: [
+   *     "adjustDarknessLevel",
+   *     "displayScrollingText",
+   *     "executeMacro",
+   *     "executeScript",
+   *     "pauseGame",
+   *     "suppressWeather",
+   *     "teleportToken",
+   *     "toggleBehavior"
+   *   ],
+   *   hasTypeData: true,
+   *   isEmbedded: true,
+   *   permissions: {
+   *     create: this.#canCreate,
+   *     update: this.#canUpdate
+   *   },
+   *   schemaVersion: "12.324"
+   * })
+   * ```
+   */
+  static override metadata: BaseRegionBehavior.Metadata;
+
+  static override defineSchema(): BaseRegionBehavior.Schema;
+
+  static override canUserCreate(user: User.Internal.Implementation): boolean;
+
+  /*
+   * After this point these are not really overridden methods.
+   * They are here because Foundry's documents are complex and have lots of edge cases.
+   * There are DRY ways of representing this but this ends up being harder to understand
+   * for end users extending these functions, especially for static methods. There are also a
+   * number of methods that don't make sense to call directly on `Document` like `createDocuments`,
+   * as there is no data that can safely construct every possible document. Finally keeping definitions
+   * separate like this helps against circularities.
+   */
+
+  /* Document overrides */
+
+  static " fvtt_types_internal_document_name_static": "RegionBehavior";
+
+  // Same as Document for now
+  protected static override _initializationOrder(): Generator<[string, DataField.Any]>;
+
+  readonly parentCollection: RegionBehavior.ParentCollectionName | null;
+
+  readonly pack: string | null;
+
+  static get implementation(): RegionBehavior.ImplementationClass;
+
+  static get baseDocument(): typeof BaseRegionBehavior;
+
+  static get collectionName(): RegionBehavior.ParentCollectionName;
+
+  static get documentName(): RegionBehavior.Name;
+
+  static get TYPES(): BaseRegionBehavior.SubType[];
+
+  static get hasTypeData(): true;
+
+  static get hierarchy(): RegionBehavior.Hierarchy;
+
+  override system: RegionBehavior.SystemOfType<SubType>;
+
+  override parent: BaseRegionBehavior.Parent;
+
+  static createDocuments<Temporary extends boolean | undefined = false>(
+    data: Array<RegionBehavior.Implementation | RegionBehavior.CreateData> | undefined,
+    operation?: Document.Database.CreateOperation<RegionBehavior.Database.Create<Temporary>>,
+  ): Promise<Array<Document.TemporaryIf<RegionBehavior.Implementation, Temporary>>>;
+
+  static updateDocuments(
+    updates: RegionBehavior.UpdateData[] | undefined,
+    operation?: Document.Database.UpdateDocumentsOperation<RegionBehavior.Database.Update>,
+  ): Promise<RegionBehavior.Implementation[]>;
+
+  static deleteDocuments(
+    ids: readonly string[] | undefined,
+    operation?: Document.Database.DeleteDocumentsOperation<RegionBehavior.Database.Delete>,
+  ): Promise<RegionBehavior.Implementation[]>;
+
+  static override create<Temporary extends boolean | undefined = false>(
+    data: RegionBehavior.CreateData | RegionBehavior.CreateData[],
+    operation?: RegionBehavior.Database.CreateOperation<Temporary>,
+  ): Promise<Document.TemporaryIf<RegionBehavior.Implementation, Temporary> | undefined>;
+
+  override update(
+    data: RegionBehavior.UpdateData | undefined,
+    operation?: RegionBehavior.Database.UpdateOperation,
+  ): Promise<this | undefined>;
+
+  override delete(operation?: RegionBehavior.Database.DeleteOperation): Promise<this | undefined>;
+
+  static override get(
+    documentId: string,
+    options?: RegionBehavior.Database.GetOptions,
+  ): RegionBehavior.Implementation | null;
+
+  static override getCollectionName(name: string): null;
+
+  // Same as Document for now
+  override traverseEmbeddedDocuments(_parentPath?: string): Generator<[string, Document.AnyChild<this>]>;
+
+  override getFlag<Scope extends RegionBehavior.Flags.Scope, Key extends RegionBehavior.Flags.Key<Scope>>(
+    scope: Scope,
+    key: Key,
+  ): Document.GetFlag<RegionBehavior.Name, Scope, Key>;
+
+  override setFlag<
+    Scope extends RegionBehavior.Flags.Scope,
+    Key extends RegionBehavior.Flags.Key<Scope>,
+    Value extends Document.GetFlag<RegionBehavior.Name, Scope, Key>,
+  >(scope: Scope, key: Key, value: Value): Promise<this>;
+
+  override unsetFlag<Scope extends RegionBehavior.Flags.Scope, Key extends RegionBehavior.Flags.Key<Scope>>(
+    scope: Scope,
+    key: Key,
+  ): Promise<this>;
+
+  protected _preCreate(
+    data: RegionBehavior.CreateData,
+    options: RegionBehavior.Database.PreCreateOptions,
+    user: User.Implementation,
+  ): Promise<boolean | void>;
+
+  protected _onCreate(
+    data: RegionBehavior.CreateData,
+    options: RegionBehavior.Database.OnCreateOperation,
+    userId: string,
+  ): void;
+
+  protected static _preCreateOperation(
+    documents: RegionBehavior.Implementation[],
+    operation: Document.Database.PreCreateOperationStatic<RegionBehavior.Database.Create>,
+    user: User.Implementation,
+  ): Promise<boolean | void>;
+
+  protected static _onCreateOperation(
+    documents: RegionBehavior.Implementation[],
+    operation: RegionBehavior.Database.Create,
+    user: User.Implementation,
+  ): Promise<void>;
+
+  protected _preUpdate(
+    changed: RegionBehavior.UpdateData,
+    options: RegionBehavior.Database.PreUpdateOptions,
+    user: User.Implementation,
+  ): Promise<boolean | void>;
+
+  protected _onUpdate(
+    changed: RegionBehavior.UpdateData,
+    options: RegionBehavior.Database.OnUpdateOperation,
+    userId: string,
+  ): void;
+
+  protected static _preUpdateOperation(
+    documents: RegionBehavior.Implementation[],
+    operation: RegionBehavior.Database.Update,
+    user: User.Implementation,
+  ): Promise<boolean | void>;
+
+  protected static _onUpdateOperation(
+    documents: RegionBehavior.Implementation[],
+    operation: RegionBehavior.Database.Update,
+    user: User.Implementation,
+  ): Promise<void>;
+
+  protected _preDelete(
+    options: RegionBehavior.Database.PreDeleteOptions,
+    user: User.Implementation,
+  ): Promise<boolean | void>;
+
+  protected _onDelete(options: RegionBehavior.Database.OnDeleteOperation, userId: string): void;
+
+  protected static _preDeleteOperation(
+    documents: RegionBehavior.Implementation[],
+    operation: RegionBehavior.Database.Delete,
+    user: User.Implementation,
+  ): Promise<boolean | void>;
+
+  protected static _onDeleteOperation(
+    documents: RegionBehavior.Implementation[],
+    operation: RegionBehavior.Database.Delete,
+    user: User.Implementation,
+  ): Promise<void>;
+
+  static get hasSystemData(): true;
+
+  // These data field things have been ticketed but will probably go into backlog hell for a while.
+  // We'll end up copy and pasting without modification for now I think. It makes it a tiny bit easier to update though.
+  protected static _addDataFieldShims(data: AnyObject, shims: AnyObject, options?: Document.DataFieldShimOptions): void;
+
+  protected static _addDataFieldMigration(
+    data: AnyObject,
+    oldKey: string,
+    newKey: string,
+    apply?: (data: AnyObject) => unknown,
+  ): unknown;
+
+  protected static _logDataFieldMigration(
+    oldKey: string,
+    newKey: string,
+    options?: LogCompatibilityWarningOptions,
+  ): void;
+
+  protected static _onCreateDocuments(
+    documents: RegionBehavior.Implementation[],
+    context: Document.ModificationContext<RegionBehavior.Parent>,
+  ): Promise<void>;
+
+  protected static _onUpdateDocuments(
+    documents: RegionBehavior.Implementation[],
+    context: Document.ModificationContext<RegionBehavior.Parent>,
+  ): Promise<void>;
+
+  protected static _onDeleteDocuments(
+    documents: RegionBehavior.Implementation[],
+    context: Document.ModificationContext<RegionBehavior.Parent>,
+  ): Promise<void>;
+
+  /* DataModel overrides */
+
+  protected static _schema: SchemaField<RegionBehavior.Schema>;
+
+  static get schema(): SchemaField<RegionBehavior.Schema>;
+
+  static validateJoint(data: RegionBehavior.Source): void;
+
+  static override fromSource(
+    source: RegionBehavior.UpdateData,
+    { strict, ...context }?: DataModel.FromSourceOptions,
+  ): RegionBehavior.Implementation;
+
+  static override fromJSON(json: string): RegionBehavior.Implementation;
+}
+
+export default BaseRegionBehavior;
+
+declare namespace BaseRegionBehavior {
+  export import Name = RegionBehavior.Name;
+  export import ConstructorArgs = RegionBehavior.ConstructorArgs;
+  export import Hierarchy = RegionBehavior.Hierarchy;
+  export import Metadata = RegionBehavior.Metadata;
+  export import SubType = RegionBehavior.SubType;
+  export import ConfiguredSubTypes = RegionBehavior.ConfiguredSubTypes;
+  export import Known = RegionBehavior.Known;
+  export import OfType = RegionBehavior.OfType;
+  export import SystemOfType = RegionBehavior.SystemOfType;
+  export import Parent = RegionBehavior.Parent;
+  export import Descendant = RegionBehavior.Descendant;
+  export import DescendantClass = RegionBehavior.DescendantClass;
+  export import Pack = RegionBehavior.Pack;
+  export import Embedded = RegionBehavior.Embedded;
+  export import ParentCollectionName = RegionBehavior.ParentCollectionName;
+  export import CollectionClass = RegionBehavior.CollectionClass;
+  export import Collection = RegionBehavior.Collection;
+  export import Invalid = RegionBehavior.Invalid;
+  export import Stored = RegionBehavior.Stored;
+  export import Source = RegionBehavior.Source;
+  export import PersistedData = RegionBehavior.PersistedData;
+  export import CreateData = RegionBehavior.CreateData;
+  export import InitializedData = RegionBehavior.InitializedData;
+  export import UpdateData = RegionBehavior.UpdateData;
+  export import Schema = RegionBehavior.Schema;
+  export import DatabaseOperation = RegionBehavior.Database;
+  export import Flags = RegionBehavior.Flags;
+
+  // The document subclasses override `system` anyways.
+  // There's no point in doing expensive computation work comparing the base class system.
+  /** @internal */
+  interface _Schema extends RegionBehavior.Schema {
+    system: any;
+  }
+
+  /**
+   * @deprecated This type is used by Foundry too vaguely.
+   * In one context the most correct type is after initialization whereas in another one it should be
+   * before but Foundry uses it interchangeably.
+   */
+  type Properties = SchemaField.InitializedData<Schema>;
+
+  /** @deprecated {@link BaseRegionBehavior.SubType | `BaseRegionBehavior.SubType`} */
+  type TypeNames = SubType;
+
+  /**
+   * @deprecated {@link foundry.data.fields.SchemaField | `SchemaField<BaseRegionBehavior.Schema>`}
+   */
+  type SchemaField = foundry.data.fields.SchemaField<Schema>;
+
+  /**
+   * @deprecated {@link BaseRegionBehavior.CreateData | `BaseRegionBehavior.CreateData`}
+   */
+  type ConstructorData = BaseRegionBehavior.CreateData;
+}

package/src/foundry/common/documents/region.d.mts

@@ -0,0 +1,327 @@
+import type { AnyObject } from "../../../utils/index.d.mts";
+import type DataModel from "../abstract/data.d.mts";
+import type Document from "../abstract/document.mts";
+import type { DataField, SchemaField } from "../data/fields.d.mts";
+import type { LogCompatibilityWarningOptions } from "../utils/logging.d.mts";
+
+/**
+ * The Region Document.
+ * Defines the DataSchema and common behaviors for a Region which are shared between both client and server.
+ */
+declare abstract class BaseRegion extends Document<"Region", BaseRegion.Schema, any> {
+  /**
+   * @param data    - Initial data from which to construct the `BaseRegion`
+   * @param context - Construction context options
+   *
+   * @deprecated Constructing `BaseRegion` directly is not advised. The base document classes exist in
+   * order to use documents on both the client (i.e. where all your code runs) and behind the scenes
+   * on the server to manage document validation and storage.
+   *
+   * You should use {@link RegionDocument.implementation | `new RegionDocument.implementation(...)`} instead which will give you
+   * a system specific implementation of `RegionDocument`.
+   */
+  constructor(...args: RegionDocument.ConstructorArgs);
+
+  /**
+   * @defaultValue
+   * ```js
+   * mergeObject(super.metadata, {
+   *   name: "Region",
+   *   collection: "regions",
+   *   label: "DOCUMENT.Region",
+   *   labelPlural: "DOCUMENT.Regions",
+   *   isEmbedded: true,
+   *   embedded: {
+   *     RegionBehavior: "behaviors"
+   *   },
+   *   schemaVersion: "12.324"
+   * }
+   * ```
+   */
+  static override metadata: BaseRegion.Metadata;
+
+  static override defineSchema(): BaseRegion.Schema;
+
+  /*
+   * After this point these are not really overridden methods.
+   * They are here because Foundry's documents are complex and have lots of edge cases.
+   * There are DRY ways of representing this but this ends up being harder to understand
+   * for end users extending these functions, especially for static methods. There are also a
+   * number of methods that don't make sense to call directly on `Document` like `createDocuments`,
+   * as there is no data that can safely construct every possible document. Finally keeping definitions
+   * separate like this helps against circularities.
+   */
+
+  /* Document overrides */
+
+  static " fvtt_types_internal_document_name_static": "Region";
+
+  // Same as Document for now
+  protected static override _initializationOrder(): Generator<[string, DataField.Any]>;
+
+  readonly parentCollection: RegionDocument.ParentCollectionName | null;
+
+  readonly pack: string | null;
+
+  static get implementation(): RegionDocument.ImplementationClass;
+
+  static get baseDocument(): typeof BaseRegion;
+
+  static get collectionName(): RegionDocument.ParentCollectionName;
+
+  static get documentName(): RegionDocument.Name;
+
+  static get TYPES(): CONST.BASE_DOCUMENT_TYPE[];
+
+  static get hasTypeData(): undefined;
+
+  static get hierarchy(): RegionDocument.Hierarchy;
+
+  override parent: BaseRegion.Parent;
+
+  static createDocuments<Temporary extends boolean | undefined = false>(
+    data: Array<RegionDocument.Implementation | RegionDocument.CreateData> | undefined,
+    operation?: Document.Database.CreateOperation<RegionDocument.Database.Create<Temporary>>,
+  ): Promise<Array<Document.TemporaryIf<RegionDocument.Implementation, Temporary>>>;
+
+  static updateDocuments(
+    updates: RegionDocument.UpdateData[] | undefined,
+    operation?: Document.Database.UpdateDocumentsOperation<RegionDocument.Database.Update>,
+  ): Promise<RegionDocument.Implementation[]>;
+
+  static deleteDocuments(
+    ids: readonly string[] | undefined,
+    operation?: Document.Database.DeleteDocumentsOperation<RegionDocument.Database.Delete>,
+  ): Promise<RegionDocument.Implementation[]>;
+
+  static override create<Temporary extends boolean | undefined = false>(
+    data: RegionDocument.CreateData | RegionDocument.CreateData[],
+    operation?: RegionDocument.Database.CreateOperation<Temporary>,
+  ): Promise<Document.TemporaryIf<RegionDocument.Implementation, Temporary> | undefined>;
+
+  override update(
+    data: RegionDocument.UpdateData | undefined,
+    operation?: RegionDocument.Database.UpdateOperation,
+  ): Promise<this | undefined>;
+
+  override delete(operation?: RegionDocument.Database.DeleteOperation): Promise<this | undefined>;
+
+  static override get(
+    documentId: string,
+    options?: RegionDocument.Database.GetOptions,
+  ): RegionDocument.Implementation | null;
+
+  static override getCollectionName<CollectionName extends RegionDocument.Embedded.Name>(
+    name: CollectionName,
+  ): RegionDocument.Embedded.CollectionNameOf<CollectionName> | null;
+
+  override getEmbeddedCollection<EmbeddedName extends RegionDocument.Embedded.CollectionName>(
+    embeddedName: EmbeddedName,
+  ): RegionDocument.Embedded.CollectionFor<EmbeddedName>;
+
+  override getEmbeddedDocument<EmbeddedName extends RegionDocument.Embedded.CollectionName>(
+    embeddedName: EmbeddedName,
+    id: string,
+    options: Document.GetEmbeddedDocumentOptions,
+  ): RegionDocument.Embedded.DocumentFor<EmbeddedName> | undefined;
+
+  override createEmbeddedDocuments<EmbeddedName extends RegionDocument.Embedded.Name>(
+    embeddedName: EmbeddedName,
+    data: Document.CreateDataForName<EmbeddedName>[] | undefined,
+    // TODO(LukeAbby): The correct signature would be:
+    // operation?: Document.Database.CreateOperation<Document.Database.CreateForName<EmbeddedName>>,
+    // However this causes a number of errors.
+    operation?: object,
+  ): Promise<Array<Document.Stored<Document.ImplementationFor<EmbeddedName>>> | undefined>;
+
+  override updateEmbeddedDocuments<EmbeddedName extends RegionDocument.Embedded.Name>(
+    embeddedName: EmbeddedName,
+    updates: Document.UpdateDataForName<EmbeddedName>[] | undefined,
+    operation?: Document.Database.UpdateOperationForName<EmbeddedName>,
+  ): Promise<Array<Document.Stored<Document.ImplementationFor<EmbeddedName>>> | undefined>;
+
+  override deleteEmbeddedDocuments<EmbeddedName extends RegionDocument.Embedded.Name>(
+    embeddedName: EmbeddedName,
+    ids: Array<string>,
+    operation?: Document.Database.DeleteOperationForName<EmbeddedName>,
+  ): Promise<Array<Document.Stored<Document.ImplementationFor<EmbeddedName>>>>;
+
+  // Same as Document for now
+  override traverseEmbeddedDocuments(_parentPath?: string): Generator<[string, Document.AnyChild<this>]>;
+
+  override getFlag<Scope extends RegionDocument.Flags.Scope, Key extends RegionDocument.Flags.Key<Scope>>(
+    scope: Scope,
+    key: Key,
+  ): Document.GetFlag<RegionDocument.Name, Scope, Key>;
+
+  override setFlag<
+    Scope extends RegionDocument.Flags.Scope,
+    Key extends RegionDocument.Flags.Key<Scope>,
+    Value extends Document.GetFlag<RegionDocument.Name, Scope, Key>,
+  >(scope: Scope, key: Key, value: Value): Promise<this>;
+
+  override unsetFlag<Scope extends RegionDocument.Flags.Scope, Key extends RegionDocument.Flags.Key<Scope>>(
+    scope: Scope,
+    key: Key,
+  ): Promise<this>;
+
+  protected _preCreate(
+    data: RegionDocument.CreateData,
+    options: RegionDocument.Database.PreCreateOptions,
+    user: User.Implementation,
+  ): Promise<boolean | void>;
+
+  protected _onCreate(
+    data: RegionDocument.CreateData,
+    options: RegionDocument.Database.OnCreateOperation,
+    userId: string,
+  ): void;
+
+  protected static _preCreateOperation(
+    documents: RegionDocument.Implementation[],
+    operation: Document.Database.PreCreateOperationStatic<RegionDocument.Database.Create>,
+    user: User.Implementation,
+  ): Promise<boolean | void>;
+
+  protected static _onCreateOperation(
+    documents: RegionDocument.Implementation[],
+    operation: RegionDocument.Database.Create,
+    user: User.Implementation,
+  ): Promise<void>;
+
+  protected _preUpdate(
+    changed: RegionDocument.UpdateData,
+    options: RegionDocument.Database.PreUpdateOptions,
+    user: User.Implementation,
+  ): Promise<boolean | void>;
+
+  protected _onUpdate(
+    changed: RegionDocument.UpdateData,
+    options: RegionDocument.Database.OnUpdateOperation,
+    userId: string,
+  ): void;
+
+  protected static _preUpdateOperation(
+    documents: RegionDocument.Implementation[],
+    operation: RegionDocument.Database.Update,
+    user: User.Implementation,
+  ): Promise<boolean | void>;
+
+  protected static _onUpdateOperation(
+    documents: RegionDocument.Implementation[],
+    operation: RegionDocument.Database.Update,
+    user: User.Implementation,
+  ): Promise<void>;
+
+  protected _preDelete(
+    options: RegionDocument.Database.PreDeleteOptions,
+    user: User.Implementation,
+  ): Promise<boolean | void>;
+
+  protected _onDelete(options: RegionDocument.Database.OnDeleteOperation, userId: string): void;
+
+  protected static _preDeleteOperation(
+    documents: RegionDocument.Implementation[],
+    operation: RegionDocument.Database.Delete,
+    user: User.Implementation,
+  ): Promise<boolean | void>;
+
+  protected static _onDeleteOperation(
+    documents: RegionDocument.Implementation[],
+    operation: RegionDocument.Database.Delete,
+    user: User.Implementation,
+  ): Promise<void>;
+
+  static get hasSystemData(): undefined;
+
+  // These data field things have been ticketed but will probably go into backlog hell for a while.
+  // We'll end up copy and pasting without modification for now I think. It makes it a tiny bit easier to update though.
+  protected static _addDataFieldShims(data: AnyObject, shims: AnyObject, options?: Document.DataFieldShimOptions): void;
+
+  protected static _addDataFieldMigration(
+    data: AnyObject,
+    oldKey: string,
+    newKey: string,
+    apply?: (data: AnyObject) => unknown,
+  ): unknown;
+
+  protected static _logDataFieldMigration(
+    oldKey: string,
+    newKey: string,
+    options?: LogCompatibilityWarningOptions,
+  ): void;
+
+  protected static _onCreateDocuments(
+    documents: RegionDocument.Implementation[],
+    context: Document.ModificationContext<RegionDocument.Parent>,
+  ): Promise<void>;
+
+  protected static _onUpdateDocuments(
+    documents: RegionDocument.Implementation[],
+    context: Document.ModificationContext<RegionDocument.Parent>,
+  ): Promise<void>;
+
+  protected static _onDeleteDocuments(
+    documents: RegionDocument.Implementation[],
+    context: Document.ModificationContext<RegionDocument.Parent>,
+  ): Promise<void>;
+
+  /* DataModel overrides */
+
+  protected static _schema: SchemaField<RegionDocument.Schema>;
+
+  static get schema(): SchemaField<RegionDocument.Schema>;
+
+  static validateJoint(data: RegionDocument.Source): void;
+
+  static override fromSource(
+    source: RegionDocument.CreateData,
+    { strict, ...context }?: DataModel.FromSourceOptions,
+  ): RegionDocument.Implementation;
+
+  static override fromJSON(json: string): RegionDocument.Implementation;
+}
+
+export default BaseRegion;
+
+declare namespace BaseRegion {
+  export import Name = RegionDocument.Name;
+  export import ConstructorArgs = RegionDocument.ConstructorArgs;
+  export import Hierarchy = RegionDocument.Hierarchy;
+  export import Metadata = RegionDocument.Metadata;
+  export import Parent = RegionDocument.Parent;
+  export import Descendant = RegionDocument.Descendant;
+  export import DescendantClass = RegionDocument.DescendantClass;
+  export import Pack = RegionDocument.Pack;
+  export import Embedded = RegionDocument.Embedded;
+  export import ParentCollectionName = RegionDocument.ParentCollectionName;
+  export import CollectionClass = RegionDocument.CollectionClass;
+  export import Collection = RegionDocument.Collection;
+  export import Invalid = RegionDocument.Invalid;
+  export import Stored = RegionDocument.Stored;
+  export import Source = RegionDocument.Source;
+  export import PersistedData = RegionDocument.PersistedData;
+  export import CreateData = RegionDocument.CreateData;
+  export import InitializedData = RegionDocument.InitializedData;
+  export import UpdateData = RegionDocument.UpdateData;
+  export import Schema = RegionDocument.Schema;
+  export import DatabaseOperation = RegionDocument.Database;
+  export import Flags = RegionDocument.Flags;
+
+  /**
+   * @deprecated This type is used by Foundry too vaguely.
+   * In one context the most correct type is after initialization whereas in another one it should be
+   * before but Foundry uses it interchangeably.
+   */
+  type Properties = SchemaField.InitializedData<Schema>;
+
+  /**
+   * @deprecated {@link foundry.data.fields.SchemaField | `SchemaField<BaseRegionDocument.Schema>`}
+   */
+  type SchemaField = foundry.data.fields.SchemaField<Schema>;
+
+  /**
+   * @deprecated {@link BaseRegion.CreateData | `BaseRegionDocument.CreateData`}
+   */
+  type ConstructorData = BaseRegion.CreateData;
+}