@launchdarkly/server-sdk-ai 0.14.1 → 0.15.1

package/__tests__/Judge.test.ts

@@ -1,521 +0,0 @@
-import { LDLogger } from '@launchdarkly/js-server-sdk-common';
-
-import { LDAIConfigTracker } from '../src/api/config/LDAIConfigTracker';
-import { LDAIJudgeConfig, LDMessage } from '../src/api/config/types';
-import { Judge } from '../src/api/judge/Judge';
-import { StructuredResponse } from '../src/api/judge/types';
-import { AIProvider } from '../src/api/providers/AIProvider';
-
-describe('Judge', () => {
-  let mockProvider: jest.Mocked<AIProvider>;
-  let mockTracker: jest.Mocked<LDAIConfigTracker>;
-  let mockLogger: jest.Mocked<LDLogger>;
-  let judgeConfig: LDAIJudgeConfig;
-
-  const mockTrackData = {
-    variationKey: 'test-variation',
-    configKey: 'test-config',
-    version: 1,
-  };
-
-  beforeEach(() => {
-    // Mock the AIProvider - only mock what's actually used
-    mockProvider = {
-      invokeStructuredModel: jest.fn(),
-    } as any;
-
-    // Mock the LDAIConfigTracker - only mock what's actually used
-    mockTracker = {
-      trackMetricsOf: jest.fn(),
-      getTrackData: jest.fn().mockReturnValue(mockTrackData),
-    } as any;
-
-    // Mock the logger - only mock what's actually used
-    mockLogger = {
-      debug: jest.fn(),
-      warn: jest.fn(),
-      error: jest.fn(),
-    } as any;
-
-    // Create a basic judge config
-    judgeConfig = {
-      key: 'test-judge',
-      enabled: true,
-      messages: [
-        { role: 'system', content: 'You are a helpful judge that evaluates AI responses.' },
-        {
-          role: 'user',
-          content:
-            'Evaluate and report scores for important metrics: Input: {{message_history}}, Output: {{response_to_evaluate}}',
-        },
-      ],
-      model: { name: 'gpt-4' },
-      provider: { name: 'openai' },
-      tracker: mockTracker,
-      evaluationMetricKeys: ['relevance', 'accuracy', 'helpfulness'],
-    };
-  });
-
-  describe('constructor', () => {
-    it('initializes with proper configuration', () => {
-      const judge = new Judge(judgeConfig, mockTracker, mockProvider, mockLogger);
-
-      expect(judge).toBeDefined();
-    });
-  });
-
-  describe('evaluate', () => {
-    let judge: Judge;
-
-    beforeEach(() => {
-      judge = new Judge(judgeConfig, mockTracker, mockProvider, mockLogger);
-    });
-
-    it('evaluates AI response successfully', async () => {
-      const mockStructuredResponse: StructuredResponse = {
-        data: {
-          evaluations: {
-            relevance: { score: 0.8, reasoning: 'The response is relevant to the question' },
-            accuracy: { score: 0.9, reasoning: 'The response is factually accurate' },
-            helpfulness: { score: 0.7, reasoning: 'The response provides helpful information' },
-          },
-        },
-        rawResponse: JSON.stringify({
-          evaluations: {
-            relevance: { score: 0.8, reasoning: 'The response is relevant to the question' },
-            accuracy: { score: 0.9, reasoning: 'The response is factually accurate' },
-            helpfulness: { score: 0.7, reasoning: 'The response provides helpful information' },
-          },
-        }),
-        metrics: {
-          success: true,
-          usage: {
-            total: 100,
-            input: 50,
-            output: 50,
-          },
-        },
-      };
-
-      mockTracker.trackMetricsOf.mockImplementation(async (extractor, func) => func());
-      mockProvider.invokeStructuredModel.mockResolvedValue(mockStructuredResponse);
-
-      const result = await judge.evaluate(
-        'What is the capital of France?',
-        'Paris is the capital of France.',
-      );
-
-      expect(result).toEqual({
-        evals: {
-          relevance: {
-            score: 0.8,
-            reasoning: 'The response is relevant to the question',
-          },
-          accuracy: {
-            score: 0.9,
-            reasoning: 'The response is factually accurate',
-          },
-          helpfulness: {
-            score: 0.7,
-            reasoning: 'The response provides helpful information',
-          },
-        },
-        success: true,
-        judgeConfigKey: 'test-judge',
-      });
-
-      expect(mockProvider.invokeStructuredModel).toHaveBeenCalledWith(
-        expect.arrayContaining([
-          expect.objectContaining({
-            role: 'system',
-            content: 'You are a helpful judge that evaluates AI responses.',
-          }),
-          expect.objectContaining({
-            role: 'user',
-            content:
-              'Evaluate and report scores for important metrics: Input: What is the capital of France?, Output: Paris is the capital of France.',
-          }),
-        ]),
-        expect.any(Object), // evaluation response structure
-      );
-    });
-
-    it('handles sampling rate correctly', async () => {
-      // Mock Math.random to return 0.3 (should be sampled with rate 0.5 since 0.3 <= 0.5)
-      const originalRandom = Math.random;
-      Math.random = jest.fn().mockReturnValue(0.3);
-
-      // Mock the structured response
-      const mockStructuredResponse: StructuredResponse = {
-        data: {
-          evaluations: {
-            relevance: { score: 0.8, reasoning: 'Good' },
-            accuracy: { score: 0.9, reasoning: 'Accurate' },
-            helpfulness: { score: 0.7, reasoning: 'Helpful' },
-          },
-        },
-        rawResponse: JSON.stringify({
-          evaluations: {
-            relevance: { score: 0.8, reasoning: 'Good' },
-            accuracy: { score: 0.9, reasoning: 'Accurate' },
-            helpfulness: { score: 0.7, reasoning: 'Helpful' },
-          },
-        }),
-        metrics: {
-          success: true,
-          usage: { total: 100, input: 50, output: 50 },
-        },
-      };
-
-      mockTracker.trackMetricsOf.mockImplementation(async (extractor, func) => func());
-      mockProvider.invokeStructuredModel.mockResolvedValue(mockStructuredResponse);
-
-      const result = await judge.evaluate('test input', 'test output', 0.5);
-
-      expect(result).toBeDefined();
-      expect(mockProvider.invokeStructuredModel).toHaveBeenCalled();
-
-      Math.random = originalRandom;
-    });
-
-    it('returns undefined when not sampled', async () => {
-      // Mock Math.random to return 0.8 (should not be sampled with rate 0.5 since 0.8 > 0.5)
-      const originalRandom = Math.random;
-      Math.random = jest.fn().mockReturnValue(0.8);
-
-      const result = await judge.evaluate('test input', 'test output', 0.5);
-
-      expect(result).toBeUndefined();
-      expect(mockProvider.invokeStructuredModel).not.toHaveBeenCalled();
-      expect(mockLogger.debug).toHaveBeenCalledWith(
-        'Judge evaluation skipped due to sampling rate: 0.5',
-      );
-
-      Math.random = originalRandom;
-    });
-
-    it('returns undefined when evaluationMetricKeys is empty', async () => {
-      const configWithoutMetrics: LDAIJudgeConfig = {
-        ...judgeConfig,
-        evaluationMetricKeys: [],
-      };
-      const judgeWithoutMetrics = new Judge(
-        configWithoutMetrics,
-        mockTracker,
-        mockProvider,
-        mockLogger,
-      );
-
-      const result = await judgeWithoutMetrics.evaluate('test input', 'test output');
-
-      expect(result).toBeUndefined();
-      expect(mockLogger.warn).toHaveBeenCalledWith(
-        'Judge configuration is missing required evaluationMetricKeys',
-        mockTrackData,
-      );
-    });
-
-    it('returns undefined when messages are missing', async () => {
-      const configWithoutMessages: LDAIJudgeConfig = {
-        ...judgeConfig,
-        messages: undefined,
-      };
-      const judgeWithoutMessages = new Judge(
-        configWithoutMessages,
-        mockTracker,
-        mockProvider,
-        mockLogger,
-      );
-
-      const result = await judgeWithoutMessages.evaluate('test input', 'test output');
-
-      expect(result).toBeUndefined();
-      expect(mockLogger.warn).toHaveBeenCalledWith(
-        'Judge configuration must include messages',
-        mockTrackData,
-      );
-    });
-
-    it('returns partial evaluations when some metrics are missing', async () => {
-      const mockStructuredResponse: StructuredResponse = {
-        data: {
-          evaluations: {
-            relevance: { score: 0.8, reasoning: 'Good' },
-            // accuracy is missing
-            helpfulness: { score: 0.7, reasoning: 'Helpful' },
-          },
-        },
-        rawResponse: JSON.stringify({
-          evaluations: {
-            relevance: { score: 0.8, reasoning: 'Good' },
-            helpfulness: { score: 0.7, reasoning: 'Helpful' },
-          },
-        }),
-        metrics: {
-          success: true,
-          usage: { total: 100, input: 50, output: 50 },
-        },
-      };
-
-      mockTracker.trackMetricsOf.mockImplementation(async (extractor, func) => func());
-      mockProvider.invokeStructuredModel.mockResolvedValue(mockStructuredResponse);
-
-      const result = await judge.evaluate('test input', 'test output');
-
-      // When one metric is missing, it returns the partial evals it has with success: false
-      expect(result).toEqual({
-        evals: {
-          relevance: { score: 0.8, reasoning: 'Good' },
-          helpfulness: { score: 0.7, reasoning: 'Helpful' },
-        },
-        success: false,
-        judgeConfigKey: 'test-judge',
-      });
-    });
-
-    it('returns empty evaluations when response structure is malformed', async () => {
-      const mockStructuredResponse: StructuredResponse = {
-        data: {
-          // Missing 'evaluations' wrapper - malformed structure
-          relevance: { score: 0.8, reasoning: 'Good' },
-          accuracy: { score: 0.9, reasoning: 'Accurate' },
-          helpfulness: { score: 0.7, reasoning: 'Helpful' },
-        },
-        rawResponse: JSON.stringify({
-          relevance: { score: 0.8, reasoning: 'Good' },
-          accuracy: { score: 0.9, reasoning: 'Accurate' },
-          helpfulness: { score: 0.7, reasoning: 'Helpful' },
-        }),
-        metrics: {
-          success: true,
-          usage: { total: 100, input: 50, output: 50 },
-        },
-      };
-
-      mockTracker.trackMetricsOf.mockImplementation(async (extractor, func) => func());
-      mockProvider.invokeStructuredModel.mockResolvedValue(mockStructuredResponse);
-
-      const result = await judge.evaluate('test input', 'test output');
-
-      // When the structure is completely wrong, returns empty evals with success: false
-      expect(result).toEqual({
-        evals: {},
-        success: false,
-        judgeConfigKey: 'test-judge',
-      });
-    });
-
-    it('handles provider errors gracefully', async () => {
-      const error = new Error('Provider error');
-      mockTracker.trackMetricsOf.mockRejectedValue(error);
-
-      const result = await judge.evaluate('test input', 'test output');
-
-      expect(result).toEqual({
-        evals: {},
-        success: false,
-        error: 'Provider error',
-        judgeConfigKey: 'test-judge',
-      });
-      expect(mockLogger.error).toHaveBeenCalledWith('Judge evaluation failed:', error);
-    });
-
-    it('handles non-Error exceptions', async () => {
-      mockTracker.trackMetricsOf.mockRejectedValue('String error');
-
-      const result = await judge.evaluate('test input', 'test output');
-
-      expect(result).toEqual({
-        evals: {},
-        success: false,
-        error: 'Unknown error',
-        judgeConfigKey: 'test-judge',
-      });
-    });
-  });
-
-  describe('evaluateMessages', () => {
-    let judge: Judge;
-
-    beforeEach(() => {
-      judge = new Judge(judgeConfig, mockTracker, mockProvider, mockLogger);
-    });
-
-    it('evaluates messages and response successfully', async () => {
-      const messages: LDMessage[] = [
-        { role: 'user', content: 'What is the capital of France?' },
-        { role: 'assistant', content: 'Paris is the capital of France.' },
-      ];
-      const response = {
-        message: { role: 'assistant' as const, content: 'Paris is the capital of France.' },
-        metrics: { success: true },
-      };
-
-      const mockStructuredResponse: StructuredResponse = {
-        data: {
-          evaluations: {
-            relevance: { score: 0.8, reasoning: 'The response is relevant to the question' },
-            accuracy: { score: 0.9, reasoning: 'The response is factually accurate' },
-            helpfulness: { score: 0.7, reasoning: 'The response provides helpful information' },
-          },
-        },
-        rawResponse: JSON.stringify({
-          evaluations: {
-            relevance: { score: 0.8, reasoning: 'The response is relevant to the question' },
-            accuracy: { score: 0.9, reasoning: 'The response is factually accurate' },
-            helpfulness: { score: 0.7, reasoning: 'The response provides helpful information' },
-          },
-        }),
-        metrics: {
-          success: true,
-          usage: { total: 100, input: 50, output: 50 },
-        },
-      };
-
-      mockTracker.trackMetricsOf.mockImplementation(async (extractor, func) => func());
-      mockProvider.invokeStructuredModel.mockResolvedValue(mockStructuredResponse);
-
-      const result = await judge.evaluateMessages(messages, response);
-
-      expect(result).toEqual({
-        evals: {
-          relevance: {
-            score: 0.8,
-            reasoning: 'The response is relevant to the question',
-          },
-          accuracy: {
-            score: 0.9,
-            reasoning: 'The response is factually accurate',
-          },
-          helpfulness: {
-            score: 0.7,
-            reasoning: 'The response provides helpful information',
-          },
-        },
-        success: true,
-        judgeConfigKey: 'test-judge',
-      });
-
-      expect(mockProvider.invokeStructuredModel).toHaveBeenCalledWith(
-        expect.arrayContaining([
-          expect.objectContaining({
-            role: 'system',
-            content: 'You are a helpful judge that evaluates AI responses.',
-          }),
-          expect.objectContaining({
-            role: 'user',
-            content:
-              'Evaluate and report scores for important metrics: Input: What is the capital of France?\r\nParis is the capital of France., Output: Paris is the capital of France.',
-          }),
-        ]),
-        expect.any(Object), // evaluation response structure
-      );
-    });
-
-    it('handles sampling rate correctly', async () => {
-      const messages: LDMessage[] = [{ role: 'user', content: 'test' }];
-      const response = {
-        message: { role: 'assistant' as const, content: 'test response' },
-        metrics: { success: true },
-      };
-
-      // Mock Math.random to return 0.8 (should not be sampled with rate 0.5 since 0.8 > 0.5)
-      const originalRandom = Math.random;
-      Math.random = jest.fn().mockReturnValue(0.8);
-
-      const result = await judge.evaluateMessages(messages, response, 0.5);
-
-      expect(result).toBeUndefined();
-      expect(mockProvider.invokeStructuredModel).not.toHaveBeenCalled();
-
-      Math.random = originalRandom;
-    });
-  });
-
-  describe('_constructEvaluationMessages', () => {
-    let judge: Judge;
-
-    beforeEach(() => {
-      judge = new Judge(judgeConfig, mockTracker, mockProvider, mockLogger);
-    });
-
-    it('constructs evaluation messages correctly', () => {
-      // Access private method for testing
-      // eslint-disable-next-line no-underscore-dangle
-      const constructMessages = (judge as any)._constructEvaluationMessages.bind(judge);
-      const messages = constructMessages('test input', 'test output');
-
-      expect(messages).toHaveLength(2);
-      expect(messages[0]).toEqual({
-        role: 'system',
-        content: 'You are a helpful judge that evaluates AI responses.',
-      });
-      expect(messages[1]).toEqual({
-        role: 'user',
-        content:
-          'Evaluate and report scores for important metrics: Input: test input, Output: test output',
-      });
-    });
-  });
-
-  describe('_parseEvaluationResponse', () => {
-    let judge: Judge;
-
-    beforeEach(() => {
-      judge = new Judge(judgeConfig, mockTracker, mockProvider, mockLogger);
-    });
-
-    it('parses valid evaluation response correctly', () => {
-      // eslint-disable-next-line no-underscore-dangle
-      const parseResponse = (judge as any)._parseEvaluationResponse.bind(judge);
-      const responseData = {
-        evaluations: {
-          relevance: { score: 0.8, reasoning: 'Good' },
-          accuracy: { score: 0.9, reasoning: 'Accurate' },
-          helpfulness: { score: 0.7, reasoning: 'Helpful' },
-        },
-      };
-
-      const result = parseResponse(responseData);
-
-      expect(result).toEqual({
-        relevance: { score: 0.8, reasoning: 'Good' },
-        accuracy: { score: 0.9, reasoning: 'Accurate' },
-        helpfulness: { score: 0.7, reasoning: 'Helpful' },
-      });
-    });
-
-    it('returns empty object for invalid response data', () => {
-      // eslint-disable-next-line no-underscore-dangle
-      const parseResponse = (judge as any)._parseEvaluationResponse.bind(judge);
-      const responseData = {
-        relevance: { score: 0.8, reasoning: 'Good' },
-        // Missing evaluations wrapper - invalid structure
-      };
-
-      const result = parseResponse(responseData);
-
-      // Returns empty object when evaluations structure is missing
-      expect(result).toEqual({});
-    });
-
-    it('handles missing score or reasoning fields', () => {
-      // eslint-disable-next-line no-underscore-dangle
-      const parseResponse = (judge as any)._parseEvaluationResponse.bind(judge);
-      const responseData = {
-        evaluations: {
-          relevance: { score: 0.8 }, // Missing reasoning
-          accuracy: { reasoning: 'Accurate' }, // Missing score
-          helpfulness: { score: 0.7, reasoning: 'Helpful' },
-        },
-      };
-
-      const result = parseResponse(responseData);
-
-      // Only helpfulness passes validation, relevance and accuracy are skipped
-      expect(result).toEqual({
-        helpfulness: { score: 0.7, reasoning: 'Helpful' },
-      });
-    });
-  });
-});